Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T22:25:26.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Human biology from the bronze age to the iron age in the Mun River valley of northeast Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Kate Domett
Affiliation:
James Cook University Townsville Australia
Nancy Tayles
Affiliation:
University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
Marc Oxenham
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Nancy Tayles
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Prehistory

Recent excavations of two sites in the Mun River valley in Northeast Thailand (Fig. 1.1, p. 5) as part of The Origins of Angkor Project have uncovered two large cemeteries. The site of Ban Lum Khao includes a bronze age cemetery in use between approximately 3400 and 2500 BP (Higham 2002). A 10 m × 14 m square was excavated to a maximum depth of 1.7 m on the edge of this mounded site as other areas of the site had been subjected to looting (Higham 2002). The cemetery site of Noen U-Loke, only a few kilometres to the west, is dated to the iron age, approximately 2300–2200 BP to 1700–1600 BP (Higham 2002). This iron age site was considerably more extensive than earlier sites and covered up to 12 ha (Higham 2002). A total of 220 m2 were excavated to a depth of 5 m (Higham 2002). Given the size of these sites, neither was excavated to their full extent. These two sites present an opportunity to compare health changes through time with the significant advantage that the populations lived in similar natural environments.

The aim of the Origins of Angkor Project is to investigate the social, cultural and technological developments in the Mun River valley that led to autonomous communities in this area undergoing the transition to more centralised and hierarchical societies (Higham and Thosarat 1998). The descendants of these communities built large-scale monuments and temples, some of which are still standing in the northeast today.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, W. E. and McGrath, R. J. 2001a. The geoarchaeology of the prehistoric ditched sites of the upper Mae Nam Mun valley, northeast Thailand, III: late Holocene vegetation history. Palaeo 171: 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, W. E. and McGrath, R. J. 2001b. Iron age vegetation dynamics and human impacts on the vegetation of the upper Mun River floodplain, northeast Thailand. New Zealand Geographer 57: 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. N. and Armelagos, G. J. (eds.). 1984. Paleopathology at the Origins of Agriculture. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Domett K. M. 2001. British Archaeological Reports International Series, No. 946. Health in Late Prehistoric Thailand. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Douglas M. T. 1996. Paleopathology in human skeletal remains from the pre-metal, bronze and iron ages, northeastern Thailand. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hawaii.
Goodman, A. H. and Armelagos, G. J. 1989. Infant and child morbidity and mortality risks in archaeological populations. World Archaeology 21: 225–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, A. H., Armelagos, G. J. and Rose, J. C. 1980. Enamel hypoplasia as indicators of stress in three prehistoric populations from Illinois. Human Biology 52: 515–528.Google ScholarPubMed
Higham, C. F. W. 1996. The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Higham, C. F. W. 2002. Early Cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia. Bangkok: River Books.Google Scholar
Higham, C. F. W. and Thosarat, R. 1998. Prehistoric Thailand. From Early Settlement to Sukhotai. Bangkok: River Books.Google Scholar
Jackes M. 1992. Paleodemography: problems and techniques. In Katzenberg, M. A. and Saunders, S., eds., Skeletal Biology of Past Peoples: Research Methods. New York: Wiley–Liss, pp. 189–224.Google Scholar
Jackes M.1994. Birth rates and bones. In Chan, L., ed., Strength in Diversity: A Reader in Physical Anthropology. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press, pp. 155–185.Google Scholar
Juliano, B. O. 1993. FAO Food and Nutrition Series, No. 26: Rice in Human Nutrition. Geneva: UN Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. S. 1997. Bioarchaeology: Interpreting behavior from the Human Skeleton. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukacs J. R. 1989. Dental paleopathology: methods for reconstructing dietary patterns. In Iscan, M. Y. and Kennedy, K. A. R., eds., Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton. New York: Liss, pp. 261–286.Google Scholar
McCaw M. 2000. The faunal remains: major variables. In Higham, C. F. W., ed., The Origins of the Civilisation of Angkor. The Final Report to the National Research Council of Thailand. Bankok: National Research Council, pp. 188–199.
Molnar, S. 1992. Human Variation. Races, Types, and Ethnic Groups. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nelsen K. M. 1999. The dental health of the people from Noen U-Loke. M.Sc. thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin.
O‘Reilly, D. J. W. 2001. From the bronze age to the iron age in Thailand: applying the heterarchical approach. Asian Perspectives 39: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechenkina, E. A., Benfer, R. A. and Zhijun, W. 2002. Diet and health changes at the end of the Chinese Neolithic: the Yangshao/Longshan transition in Shaaxi Province. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 117: 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrusewsky, M. and Douglas, M. T. 2002a. Intensification of agriculture at Ban Chiang: is there evidence from the skeletons?Asian Perspectives 40: 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrusewsky, M. and Douglas, M. T. 2002b. University Museum Monograph 111. Ban Chiang: A Prehistoric Village Site in Northeast Thailand. I: The Human Skeletal Remains. Philadelphia, PA: Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Steckel, R. H. and Rose, J. C. 2002. The Backbone of History, Health and Nutrition in the Western Hemisphere. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stini W. A. 1985. Growth rates and sexual dimorphism in evolutionary perspective. In Gilbert, R. I. and Mielke, J. H., eds., The Analysis of Prehistoric DietsOrlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 191–226.Google Scholar
Stodder, A. L. W. and Douglas, M. T. 2003. Childhood stress and determinants of adult sexual size dimorphism in late prehistoric skeletal assemblages from Guam, Mariana Islands. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement 36: 201.Google Scholar
Tayles, N. G. 1999. Report of the Research Committe LXI. The Excavation of Khok Phanom Di, a Prehistoric Site in Central Thailand, Vol. V: The People. London: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
Tayles, N., Nelsen, K., Buckley, H. and Domett, K. 1998. The Iron-age people of Noen U-Loke, Northeast Thailand: a preliminary review of the first two field seasons. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 17: 75.Google Scholar
Tayles, N., Domett, K. and Nelsen, K. 2000. Agriculture and dental caries? The case of rice in prehistoric Southeast Asia. World Archaeology 32: 68–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thosarat, R. 2000. The fish remains. In Higham, C. F. W., ed., The Origins of the Civilisation of Angkor. The Final Report to the National Research Council of Thailand. Bangkok: National Research Council, pp. 213–217.Google Scholar
Turner, C. G. 1979. Dental anthropological indication of agriculture among the Jomon people of central Japan. X. Peopling of the Pacific. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 51: 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelker J. 2002. From site specific to regional synthesis: using ceramics to bridge the gap. In The 17th Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Congress, September, Taipei.
Welch D. J. 1985. Adaptation to environmental unpredictability: intensive agriculture and regional exchange at Late Prehistoric centres in the Phimai region in Thailand. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawaii, Manoa.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×