Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T16:05:54.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Another way to live: developing a programme for local people around Tanjung Puting National Park, Central Kalimantan

from Part II - Conservation with and against people(s)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2009

Semiarto Aji Purwanto
Affiliation:
University of Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia
Navjot S. Sodhi
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Greg Acciaioli
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Maribeth Erb
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Alan Khee-Jin Tan
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Managing natural resources is indispensable if they are to be used, while at the same time maintaining their sustainability. Usage should only be undertaken if the sustainability of the natural resource is firmly assured (Sayer & Campbell 2004). As a consequence, every consumption of a resource has to be carried out simultaneously with an act of conservation to ensure its continuation. This ideal principle often goes against the principle of economic investment, however, wherein the goal is to acquire the highest profit possible in return for the lowest possible expenditure. To balance the damage done to natural resources due to greed, strategies to regulate the utilization of natural resources are crucial.

The management of natural resources is highly relevant to the actors whose lives depend on these resources. In the context of natural resources in the form of forests, usage of the forest is carried out in accordance with local regulations, which are applicable to the local actors, and national laws, which control not only the locals, but outsiders and investors external to the region. Political ecologists have shown how the natural resources in particular places (Hecht 1985; Dodds 1998), including Indonesia (Peluso 1992), are of interest to outsiders, not just regionally and nationally, but also internationally. The resulting depletion of natural resources and the environment must then be analyzed in a broader context (Blaikie 1985; Robbins 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Biodiversity and Human Livelihoods in Protected Areas
Case Studies from the Malay Archipelago
, pp. 203 - 221
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachriadi, D. & Lucas, A. (2002). Hutan milik siapa? Upaya-upaya mewujudkan forestry land reform di Kabupaten Wonosobo, Jawa Tengah. In Lounela, A. & Zakaria, Y., eds., Berebut tanah: Beberapa kajian berperspektif kampus dan kampung. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Insist Press, pp. 79–158.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, F. V. (2002). The context of law. Paper presented at the XIIIth International Congress on Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law in Social, Economic and Political Development. Chiang Mai, Thailand: 7–11 April 2002.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, F. V. (2003). Who's afraid of legal pluralism? In Pradhan, R., ed., Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Legal Pluralism. Kathmandu, Nepal: ICNEC, pp. 275–298.Google Scholar
Blaikie, P. (1985). The Political Ecology of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Blaikie, P. & Brookfield, H. (1987). Land Degradation and Society. New York, NY: Methuen.Google Scholar
Direktorat Jenderal Perlindungan Hutan Dan Pelestarian Alam (1994) Taman Nasional Tanjung Puting. Rencana Pengelolaan 1994–2019. Vol 1. Jakarta, Indonesia: Departemen Kehutanan.Google Scholar
Dodds, D. J. (1998). Lobster in the rain forest: the political ecology of Miskito wage labour and agricultural deforestation. Journal of Political Ecology, 5, 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauzi (2003) Konflik tenurial: yang diciptakan tetapi tak hendak diselesaikan. In Lounela, A. and Zakaria, Y., eds., Berebut Tanah. Beberapa Kajian berperspektif kampus dan kampung. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Insist Press, pp. 337–373.Google Scholar
Hecht, S. (1985). Environment, development and politics: capital accumulation and the livestock sector in eastern Amazonia. World Development, 13, 663–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihromi, T. O. (1993). Beberapa catatan mengenai metode kasus sengketa yang digunakan dalam Antropologi Hukum. In Ihromi, T. O.. ed., Antropologi Hukum: Sebuah Bunga Rampai. Jakarta, Indonesia: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, pp. 194–213.Google Scholar
Kepala Balai Taman Nasional Tanjung Puting (BTNTP) (2002). Sekilas Mengenai Taman Nasional Tanjung Puting: Potensi, permasalahan, dan upaya penyelesaian serta program tindak lanjut. Pangkalan Bun, Indonesia: BTNTP.Google Scholar
Li, T. M. (2003). Masyarakat adat, difference and the limits of recognition in Indonesia's forest. In Moore, D. S., A. Pandian & J. Kosek, eds., Race, Nature, and the Politics of Difference. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J. L. & Harwell, E. (2002). Whose Natural Resources? Whose Common Good? Towards a New Paradigm of Environmental Justice and the National Interest in Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Elsam.Google Scholar
Moore, D. S. (1993). Contesting terrain in Zimbabwe's eastern highlands: political ecology, ethnography, and peasant resource struggles. Economic Geography, 69, 380–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluso, N. L. (1992). Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluso, N. L. (1993). Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control. Global Environmental Change, 3, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purwanto, S. A., Haryono, Yusfi F. & Titiwening, F. (2002). Mencari alternatif ekonomi lokal: Kasus masyarakat desa sekitar Taman Nasional Tanjung Putting, Kalimantan Tengah. Jakarta, Indonesia: Laboratorium Antropologi UI & Conservation International Indonesia Program.Google Scholar
Rejsen, H. D., Meijard, E. & Sartika, S. N. (2001). Di ambang kepunahan: Kondisi orangutan di awal abad ke-21. Jakarta, Indonesia: The Gibbon Foundation.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. (2004). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sayer,, J. A. & Campbell,, B. M. (2004). The Science of Sustainable Development: Local Livelihoods and the Global Environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slaats, H. & Portier, K. (1992). Traditional Decision Making and Law: Institutions and Processes in an Indonesian Context. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University Press.Google Scholar
Susilo, H. D. (1999). The Tanjung Puting National Park and Biosphere Reserve. Jakarta, Indonesia: South–South Cooperation Programme on Environmentally Sound Socio-Economic Development, Working Paper No. 22.Google Scholar
Svenson, T. G. (2002). Formal and informal aspects of the conception legal pluralism: contemporary customary law discourses among two Aboriginal people, the Nisga'a in Northern BC Canada and the Sami in Norway. In Pradhan, R., ed., Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Legal Pluralism. Kathmandu, Nepal: ICNEC, pp. 369–382.Google Scholar
Wollenberg, E. & Ingles, A. (eds.) (1997). Incomes from the Forest: Methods for the Development and Conservation of Forest Products for Local Communities. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Wiratno, D. I., Syarifudin, A. & Kartikasari, A. (2001). Berkaca di cermin retak: Refleksi konservasi dan implikasi bagi Pengelolaan Taman Nasional. Jakarta, Indonesia: The Gibbon Foundation.Google Scholar
Woodman, G. R. (1996). Legal pluralism and the search for justice. Journal of African Law, 40, 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerner, C., ed. (2000). Peoples, Plants and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×