Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T06:18:52.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - The first string theory: personal recollections

from Part IV - The string

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2012

Leonard Susskind
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Andrea Cappelli
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Florence
Elena Castellani
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Filippo Colomo
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Florence
Paolo Di Vecchia
Affiliation:
Niels Bohr Institutet, Copenhagen and Nordita, Stockholm
Get access

Summary

Here is how I remember it. Supposedly I was a particle physicist: indeed I had spent three years as a graduate student in Cornell (1962–1965) and a year as a postdoc in Berkeley (1965–1966), learning about S-matrix theory, and hating every minute of it. The general opinion among leaders of the field was that hadronic length and time scales were so small that in principle it made no sense to probe into the guts of a hadronic process – the particles and the reactions were unopenable black boxes. Quantum field theory was out; Unitarity and Analyticity were in. Personally, I so disliked that idea that when I got my first academic job I spent most of my time with my close friend, Yakir Aharonov, on the foundations of quantum mechanics and relativity.

By 1967 I was convinced that the S-matrix black-box view was wrong-headed. I had spent a lot of time formulating relativistic quantum theory in what was then called the infinite-momentum frame (IMF), now called the light-cone frame. The idea that appealed to me was that by boosting a system to very large momentum you could slow down its internal motions. By stationing a sequence of detectors along the direction of the boost, one could imagine probing an interacting system of hadrons as it evolved. I wrote a lot of papers showing among other things that physics in the IMF had a Galilean symmetry so that the ordinary rules of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics must apply.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×