Accattino, P. and Donini, P. (eds.) (1996), Alessandro di Afrodisia: L’anima, Rome and Bari.Google Scholar

Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J. (eds.) (2014) Philosophical Themes in Galen, London.Google Scholar

Ademollo, F. (2011) The Cratylus of Plato: A Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ademollo, F. (2012) ‘The Platonic origins of Stoic theology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 217–43.Google Scholar

Alesse, A. (1994) Panezio di Rodi e la tradizione stoica, Naples.Google Scholar

Alesse, A. (ed.) (1997) Panezio di Rodi. Testimonianze, with translation and commentary, Naples.Google Scholar

Alesse, A. (2000) La Stoa e la tradizione socratica, Naples.Google Scholar

Alesse, F. (2005) ‘Mente divina e mente umana nel pensiero stoico’, in Canone, E. (ed.), Per una storia del concetto di mente, Florence: 51–62.Google Scholar

Algra, K. (2007) Conceptions and Images: Hellenistic Philosophical Theology and Traditional Religion, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Algra, K. (2009) ‘Stoics on souls and demons: Reconstructing Stoic demonology’, in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, Berlin and New York: 359–87.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1992) Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness, Oxford.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (2016) ‘Lucretius’ reception of Epicurus’ De Rerum Natura as a conversion narrative’, Hermes 144: 439–61.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1928) The Greek Atomists and Epicurus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (ed.) (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, Vol. II: Commentary, Books I–III, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bakker, F. A. (2016) Epicurean Meteorology: Sources, Method, Scope and Organization, Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balme, D. (1941) ‘Greek science and mechanism II: The Atomists’, Classical Quarterly 35: 23–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balme, D. (1972) Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium, Oxford.Google Scholar

Baltussen, H. (1993) Theophrastus on Theories of Perception, PhD dissertation, Utrecht.Google Scholar

Bazou, A. (2011) Γαληνοῦ Ὅτι ταῖς τοῦ σώματος κράσεσιν αἱ τῆς ψυχῆς δυνάμεις ἕπονται, Athens.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. (2005) ‘Force, fermeté, froid: la dimension physique de la vertu stoïcienne’, Philosophie Antique 5: 5–30.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. (2006) Faire usage: la pratique du stoïcisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. (2009) ‘How industrious can Zeus be? The extent and objects of divine activity in Stoicism’, in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Oxford: 23–45.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2002a) ‘Aristotle on pneuma and animal self-motion’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23: 85–97.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2002b) ‘Galen and the mechanical philosophy’, Apeiron 35: 235–53.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2003) ‘Ancient automata and mechanical explanation’, Phronesis 48: 344–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berryman, S. (2007) ‘Teleology without tears: Aristotle and the role of mechanistic conceptions of organisms’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37: 357–70.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2009) The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2011) ‘The evidence for Strato of Lampsacus in Hero of Alexandria’s Pneumatica’, in Desclos, Marie-Laurence and Fortenbaugh, W. W (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion, New Brunswick: 277–91.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2003) ‘Cosmological ethics in the Timaeus and Early Stoicism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 273–302.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2006) ‘Eschatology and cosmology: Models and problems’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.), The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Presocratic Period, Pisa: 29–50.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2007) ‘On the physical aspect of Heraclitus’ psychology’, Phronesis 52: 3–32.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2013) ‘On the physical aspect of Heraclitus’ psychology’, in Sider, D. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, Berlin and Boston: 225–61.Google Scholar

Bett, R. (1986) ‘Immortality and the nature of the soul in the Phaedrus’, Phronesis 31: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bett, R. (2012) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Physicists, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bett, R. (2015) ‘God: M 9.13–194’, in Algra, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds), Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics, Cambridge: 33–73.Google Scholar

Bignone, E. (1973) L’Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro, revised by V. E. Alfieri, 2 vols., Florence.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (1998) Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2012) ‘Antiochus and Platonism’, in Sedley, D. N. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge: 307–33.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.) (2007) Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity, Leuven.Google Scholar

Bos, A. P. and Ferwerda, R. (2008) Aristotle, On the Life-Bearing Spirit (De Spiritu): A Discussion with Plato and His Predecessors on Pneuma as the Instrumental Body of the Soul. Introduction, Translation, and Commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. (2007) Galien. Tome I. Introduction générale. Sur l’ordre de ses propres livres. Sur ses propres livres. Que l’excellent médecin est aussi philosophe, Paris.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. (2011) ‘La notion de mélange dans la pensée médicale de Galien: mixis ou crasis?’, Revue des Etudes Grecques 124: 261–79.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. (2013) ‘What is a mental illness, and how can it be treated? Galen’s reply as a doctor and philosopher’, in Harris, W. V. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden: 129–46.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. and Pietrobelli, A. (2005) ‘Galien ressuscité: édition princeps du De propriis placitis de Galien’, REG 118: 168–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyancé, P. (1985) Lucrezio e l’epicureismo, ed. by Grilli, A., Brescia (orig. ed. Lucrèce et l’épicurisme, Paris, 1963).Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2018) Platonist Philosophy 80 bc to ad 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brieger, A. (1893) Epikurs Lehre von der Seele, Halle.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (2000a) Lectures de Platon (Histoire de la philosophie), Paris.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (2000b) ‘Ératosthène’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques III, d’Eccélos à Juvénal, Paris: 188.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2012) ‘Self-knowledge in Cicero and Augustine (De Trinitate X 5, 7–10, 16)’, Medioevo 37: 107–35.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2016) ‘Cicero’s sceptical methods: the example of De finibus’, in Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds.), Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches, Cambridge: 12–40.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (2012) Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2014) The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood and Socrates, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, Cambridge: 113–44.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.) (1993) Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burkert, W. (1987) ‘Xenarchos statt Poseidonios: Zu Pap.Gen. inv. 203’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 67: 51–5.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1982) ‘Idealism and Greek philosophy: What Descartes saw and Berkeley missed’, The Philosophical Review 91: 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bury, R. G. (1936) Sextus Empiricus in Four Volumes. III: Against the Physicists, Against the Ethicists, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Cambiano, G., (1999) ‘Philosophy, science and medicine’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: 585–614.Google Scholar

Cambiano, G. (2000) ‘Galeno, Erasistrato e la teleologia di Aristotele’ in Manetti, D. (ed.), Studi su Galeno. Scienza, filosofia, retorica e filologia, Florence: 45–57.Google Scholar

Capelle, W. (1931) ‘Straton von Lampsakos’, in von Pauly, A. F. and Wissowa, G. (eds.), Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, IV, 1, Stuttgart: 278–315.Google Scholar

Castelli, E. (2012) ‘L’Elenchos, ovvero una ‘biblioteca’ contro le eresie’, in Magris, A. (ed.), ‘Ippolito’: Confutazione di tutte le eresie, intro. by E. Castelli, Brescia: 21–56.Google Scholar

Caston, V. (1997) ‘Epiphenomenalisms, ancient and modern’, The Philosophical Review 106: 309–63.Google Scholar

Caston, V. (2001) ‘Dicaearchus’ philosophy of mind’, in Fortenbaugh, W. and Schütrumpf, E. (eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, 10), New Brunswick: 175–93.Google Scholar

Centrone, B. (1987) ‘Alcune osservazioni sui Placita di Platone in Diogene Laerzio III 67–80’, Elenchos 8: 105–18.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. (2013) ‘The contents of consciousness: Reply to Hellie, Peacocke, and Siegel’, Analysis 73: 345–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1959) ‘Le Περὶ φιλοσοφίας d’Aristote et la théorie platonicienne des idées et des nombres’ (book review), Gnomon 31: 36–51.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1962) Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, New York.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1976) Plutarch’s Moralia in Seventeen Volumes, XIII,1, 999 C–1032 F (Loeb Classical Library, 427), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Chilton, C. W. (ed.) (1971), Diogenes of Oenoanda: The Fragments, London, New York, and Toronto.Google Scholar

Clark, S. (1975) ‘Appendix A: Pneuma’, in Aristotle’s Man: Speculations upon Aristotelian Anthropology, Oxford: 202–5.Google Scholar

Cleary, J. and Wians, W. (eds.) (1992) Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Lanham.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M. (1980) ‘Iconic memory and visible persistence’ Perception and Psychophysics 27: 183–228.Google Scholar

Conche, M. (ed.) (1987) Épicure: lettres et maximes, Paris.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. (1999) Reason and Emotion, Princeton.Google Scholar

Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini (CPF). Testi e lessico nei papiri di cultura greca e latina Parte I: Autore noti, 1**, Florence, 1992.Google Scholar

Coughlin, S., Leith, D., and Lewis, O. (eds.) (forthcoming 2020) The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle (Berlin Studies of the ancient World, 61), Berlin.Google Scholar

Crönert, W. ([1906] 1965) Kolotes und Menedemos, repr. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Cufalo, D. (ed.) (2007) Scholia Graeca in Platonem, Vol. I: Scholia ad dialogos tetralogiarum I–VII continens, Rome.Google Scholar

De Falco, V. (1923) L’epicureo Demetrio Lacone, Naples.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. (1981) Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato, edition, translation, and commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. (1982) Galen: On Semen, edition, translation, and commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar

Decleva Caizzi, F. and Funghi, M. S. (1998) ‘Natura del cielo, astri, anima. Platonismo e aristotelismo in una nuova interpretazione di PGen inv. 203’, in Papiri Filosofici. Miscellanea di Studi II (Accademia Toscana di Scienze e lettere ‘La Colombaria’, Studi, 177; Studi e testi per il Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici Greci e Latini, 9), Florence: 33–110.Google Scholar

Del Mastro, G. (2015) ‘Filodemo e la lode di Zenone Sidonio: ΠΙϹΤΟϹ ΕΡΑϹΤΗϹ ΚΑΙ ΑΚΟΠΙΑΤΟϹ ΥΜΝΗΤΗϹ’, in Beretta, M., Citti, F., and Iannucci, A. (eds.), Il culto di Epicuro: Testi, iconografia e paesaggio, Florence: 89–109.Google Scholar

Delattre, D. (2007) Philodème de Gadara. Sur la musique, Livre IV, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Desclos, M.-L. and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.) (2011) Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion, New Brunswick.Google Scholar

Devinant, J. (2016) Les troubles de l’âme chez Galien, PhD dissertation, Berlin and Paris.Google Scholar

Devinant, J. (2018) ‘Mental disorders and psychological suffering in Galen’s cases’, in Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.), Medical Conceptions of Mental Illness, from Celsus to Caelius Aurelianus, Leiden: 198–221.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci, Berlin.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1893) ‘Über das physikalische System des Straton’, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: 101–27.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1993) Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2003) The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 bc), Oxford.Google Scholar

Dobson, J. F. (1925) ‘Herophilus’, Proceedings of the Royal Society for Medicine, History of Medicine 18: 19–32.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1963) Πρόκλου Διαδόχου Στοιχείωσις θεολογική. Proclus. The Elements of Theology. A Revised Text with Translation, Introduction and Commentary (2nd edition), Oxford.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1974) Tre studi sull’aristotelismo nel II secolo d. C., Turin.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1980) ‘Motivi filosofici in Galeno’, La parola del passato 194: 333–70.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1988) ‘Tipologia degli errori e loro correzione secondo Galeno’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), Le opere psicologiche di Galeno, Naples: 65–116.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1992) ‘Galeno e la filosofia’, in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. II. Principat 36.5, Berlin and New York: 3484–504.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (2008) ‘Psychology’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: 184–209.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1992) ‘Il quarto libro delle “Vite” di Diogene Laerzio: l’Academia da Speusippo a Clitomaco’, in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. Principat 36.5, Berlin and New York: 3761–92.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1994) ‘Arcésilas de Pitane’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques I, Paris: 326–30.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2010) ‘Diogene Laerzio, Epicuro e gli editori di Epicuro e di Diogene Laerzio’, Eikasmos 21: 273–301.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (ed.) (2013) Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2014) ‘Francesco Montarese, Lucretius and His Sources: A Study of Lucretius, De rerum natura I 635–920’ (book review), Klio 96: 316–21.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2015) ‘Modi e modelli di trasmissione dell’opera Sulla natura di Epicuro’, in De Sanctis, D., Spinelli, E., Tulli, M., and Verde, F. (eds.), Questioni epicuree, Sankt Augustin: 15–52.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2017) ‘Usener redivivus: Metodologie per l’ecdotica e l’esegesi dei testi di Epicuro’, Méthexis 29: 174–82.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (2002) Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Von der ‘Seele’ als der Ursache aller sinnvollen Abläufe. Bausteine 151–168: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar (Der Platonismus in der Antike. Grundlagen—System—Entwicklung, Band 6.1), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Dougan, T. W. (ed.) (1905) M. Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum Disputationum Libri Quinque, Vol. I: Books I & II, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dougan, T. W. and Henry, R. M. (eds.) (1934) M. Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum Disputationum Libri Quinque, Vol. II: Books III–V, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (ed. and trans.) (1985) Cicero: Tusculan Disputations I, Warminster.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (ed. and trans.) (1990) Cicero: Tusculan Disputations II & V, Warminster.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (1995) ‘Form and content in the Tusculan Disputations’, in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford: 197–218.Google Scholar

Drabkin, I. E. (ed. and trans.) (1950) Caelius Aurelianus on Acute Diseases and on Chronic Diseases, Chicago.Google Scholar

Drachmann, A. G. (1948) Ktesibios, Philon and Heron: A Study in Ancient Pneumatics, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Düring, I. (1966) Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2003) Cicero, De Natura Deorum Book I, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. (1967) Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein, ed. by Temkin, O. and Temkin, C. L., Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fausti, D. (2002) ‘La presenza del linguaggio medico nel De signis di Filodemo’, I Quaderni del Ramo d’Oro 5: 62–82, www.qro.unisi.it/frontend/node/139 [accessed 17 August 2017].Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. and Baldi, L. (2002) Plutarco. La generazione dell’anima nel Timeo (Corpus Plutarchi Moralium, 37), Naples.Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J. (1990) La révélation d’Hermes Trismégiste III, Les doctrines de l’âme suivi de Jamblique, Traité de l’âme, traduction et commentaire. Porphyre, De l’animation de l’embryon. IV, Le dieu inconnu et la gnose (2nd edition), Paris.Google Scholar

Finamore, J. F. and Dillon, J. M. (2002) Iamblichus, De anima. Text, Translation, and Commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar

Flores, E., (ed.) (2002) Titus Lucretius Carus: De rerum natura, Vol. I: Libri I–III, Naples.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., Sharples, R. W., and Sollenberger, M. G. (eds.) (2003) Theophrastus of Eresus on Sweat, on Dizziness, and on Fatigue, Leiden.Google Scholar

Fraser, P. M. (1972) Ptolemaic Alexandria, Oxford.Google Scholar

Frede, D. (1997) Platon: Philebos, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2003) ‘Galen’s theology’, in Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), Galien et la philosophie, Vandœuvres: 73–129.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2005) ‘La théologie stoïcienne’, in Romeyer Dherbey, G. and Gourinat, J.-B. (eds.), Les stoïciens, Paris: 213–32.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, G. (1995) Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fuentes González, P. P. (2000) ‘Ératosthène de Cyrène’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques III, d’Eccélos à Juvénal, Paris: 188–236.Google Scholar

Furley, D. (1989) ‘Strato’s theory of void’, in Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature, Cambridge: 149–60.Google Scholar

Gaiser, K. (1998) Platons ungeschriebene Lehre. Studien zur systematischen und geschichtlichen Begründung der Wissenschaften in der Platonischen Schule (3rd edition), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

García Ballester, L. (1972) Alma y enfermedad en la obra de Galeno, Valencia and Granada.Google Scholar

Garofalo, I. (1988) Erasistrati Fragmenta, Pisa.Google Scholar

Gärtner, F. (2015) Galen. Über das Erkennen erkrankter Körperteile I–II, 2 vols (Corpus Medicorum Graecorum, 5.6.1.1), Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Gatzemeier, M. (1970) Die Naturphilosophie des Straton von Lampsakos: Zur Geschichte des Problems der Bewegung im Bereich des frühen Peripatos,Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Giancotti, F. (ed.) (1994) Tito Lucrezio Caro: La natura, Milan.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1983) ‘La chiusa del quarto libro “Della morte” di Filodemo’, in Gigante, M. (ed.), Ricerche filodemee (2nd edition), Naples: 163–234.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2007) Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations, Cambridge Classical Journal/Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, suppl. 30, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J. (1998) ‘Did Galen understand Platonic and Stoic thought on the emotions?’, in Sihvola, J. and Engberg Pedersen, T. (eds.), The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, Dordrecht: 223–48.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J. (2007) ‘Galen and the Stoics: Mortal enemies or blood brothers?’, Phronesis 52: 88–120.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J. (2009) ‘Psychology’, in Warren, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge: 125–41.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J. (2010) Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J. (2018a) ‘Galen’s peri alupias as philosophical therapy; how coherent is it?’, in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise Peri alupias (De indolentia) in Context, Leiden: 135–54.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J. (2018b) ‘Philosophical psychological therapy: did it have any impact on medical practice?’, in in Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.), Medical Conceptions of Mental Illness, from Celsus to Caelius Aurelianus, Leiden: 365–80.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.) (2009) Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Giovacchini, J. (2012) L’Empirisme d’Épicure, Paris.Google Scholar

Giussani, C. (1923) Studi lucreziani (2nd edition), Turin.Google Scholar

Göransson, T. (1995) Albinus, Alcinous, Arius Didymus (Studia graeca et latina Gothoburgensia), Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Görler, W., 2004. ‘Zum Literarischen Charakter und zur Struktur der Tusculanae disputationes’, in Görler, W. and Catrein, C. (eds.), Kleine Schriften zur hellenistisch-römischen Philosophie (Philosophia Antiqua, 95), Leiden: 212–39 [repr. from Müller-Goldingen, C. and Sier, K. (eds.) (1996) Lenaika: Festschrift für Carl Werner Müller, Stuttgart].Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H. B. (1965) ‘Strato of Lampsacus: Some texts’, Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society 11: 95–182.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. (1999) ‘Livre VII’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (ed.) Diogène Laërce, Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres, Paris.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. (2000) ‘Hermeias d’Alexandrie’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques III, d’Eccélos à Juvénal, Paris: 639–41.Google Scholar

Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (ed.) (2011) Études sur la théorie stoïcienne de l’action, Paris.Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. (2005) ‘La prohairesis chez Épictète: décision, volonté ou “personne morale”?’ Philosophie Antique 5: 93–133.Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. (2018) ‘Zénon de Citium’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques VII, d’Ulpien à Zoticus, Paris: 364–93.Google Scholar

Graver, M. (2002) Cicero on the Emotions, Chicago.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (1932) ‘The composition of the World-Soul in Timaeus 35 A–B’, Classical Philology 27: 80–2.Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. (1977) The Origins of Stoic Cosmology, Columbus.Google Scholar

Haines, C. R. (1930) Marcus Aurelius, 2nd edition, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1991a) ‘Galen’s anatomy of the soul’, Phronesis 36: 197–233.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1991b) ‘Greek medical models of mind’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought, 2: Psychology, Cambridge: 194–217.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1993) ‘Actions and passions: Affection, emotion and moral self-management in Galen’s philosophical psychology’, in Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, Cambridge: 184–222.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1995) The Sceptics, London.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2006) ‘Body and soul in Galen’, in King, R. A. H. (ed.), Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, Berlin: 232–58.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) (2008) The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2014) ‘Partitioning the soul: Galen on the anatomy of the psychic functions and mental illness’ in Corcilius, K. and Perler, D. (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin and Boston: 85–106Google Scholar

Harris, C. R. S. (1973) The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine, Oxford.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (ed.) (2013) Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden.Google Scholar

Havrda, M. (2017) ‘Body and cosmos in Galen’s account of the soul’, Phronesis 62: 69–89.Google Scholar

Hett, W. S. (1936) Aristotle: On the Soul; Parva Naturalia; On Breath, London.Google Scholar

Hiller, E. (1870) ‘II. Der Πλατωνικός des Eratosthenes’, Philologus 30: 60–72.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. (2013) ‘Disturbing connections: Sympathetic affections, mental disorder, and the elusive soul in Galen’, in Harris, W. V. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden: 147–76.Google Scholar

Hoven, R. (1971) Stoicisme et stoiciens face au problème de l’au-delà, Paris.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2014) ‘Walking and talking: reflections on divisions of the soul in Stoicism’, in Corcilius, K. and Perler, D. (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin: 63–83.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. and Donini, P. (1999) ‘Stoic ethics’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: 675–738.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. and Gerson, L. P. (2008) The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (2007) Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 bc. Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium Hellenisticum, Naples.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (1996) ‘Stoic individuals’, Philosophical Perspectives 10: 459–80.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. (1971) ‘Per l’interpretazione di Aristotele, De An. 404 B 18 sgg’, in Palmer, R. B. and Hamerton-Kelly, R. (eds), Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan, The Hague: 146–70.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. (1980) Speusippo. Frammenti. Edizione, traduzione e commento. Precedono testimonianze sull’Academia scelte e ordinate da Marcello Gigante, Naples.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. and Dorandi, T. (2012) Senocrate e Ermodoro. Testimonianze e frammenti. Edizione, traduzione e commento, Pisa.Google Scholar

Jaeger, M. (2008) Archimedes and the Roman Imagination, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. (1913) ‘Das Pneuma im Lykeion’, Hermes 48: 31–70.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. (1960) ‘Diocles of Carystus: A new pupil of Aristotle’, in Scripta minora II, Rome: 243–65.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (1997) Aristotle on the Sense-Organs, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jones, W. H. S. (1947) The Medical Writings of Anonymous Londinensis, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. (2009) ‘Does Galen have a medical programme for intellectuals and the faculties of the intellect?’, in Gill, C. J., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge: 190–205Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. (2012) ‘The legacy of the Hippocratic treatise The Nature of Man: The theory of the four humours’, in Jouanna, J., Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen, Leiden: 335–59.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. (2013) ‘The typology and aetiology of madness in ancient Greek medical and philosophical writing’, in Harris, W. V. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden: 97–118.Google Scholar

Jowett, B. (1961) The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H., Bollingen series, 71, Princeton.Google Scholar

Ju, A. E. (2009) ‘Stoic and Posidonian thought on the immortality of the soul’, Classical Quarterly 59.1: 112–24.Google Scholar

Ju, A. E. (2012) ‘Posidonius as historian of philosophy: An interpretation of Plutarch, de Animae Procreatione in Timaeo 22, 1023b–c’, in Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc: New Directions for Philosophy, Cambridge: 95–117.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. G. (1988) Posidonius II. The Commentary, 2 vols (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 14A), Cambridge.Google Scholar

Knaack, G. (1907) ‘Eratosthenes, (6)’, RE VI.1: 355–89.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2007) Lucrezio e la psicologia epicurea, trans. I. Ramelli, Milan.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2008) A Life Worthy of the Gods: The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus, Las Vegas.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2015) ‘Where in the psyche are mental pleasures experienced?’, in De Sanctis, D., Spinelli, E., Tulli, M., and Verde, F. (eds.), Questioni epicuree, Sankt Augustin: 151–58.Google Scholar

Konstan, D., (2007) ‘L’âme’, in Gigandet, A. and Morel, P.-M. (eds.), Lire Épicure et les épicuriens, Paris: 99–116.Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. (1964) Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Platonismus zwischen Platon und Plotin, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. (1971) Platonismus und hellenistische Philosophie, Berlin.Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. (2004) ‘Die Ältere Akademie’, in Flashar, H. (ed.), Die Philosophie der Antike, Band 3, Ältere Akademie. Aristoteles. Peripatos (Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie begründet von Friedrich Ueberweg, 2., durchgesehene und erweiterte Auflage), Basel: 1–165.Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. (2014) Gesammelte Aufsätze zu Platon, ed. by Mirbach, D. (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 321), Berlin.Google Scholar

Laffranque, M. (1964) Poseidonios d’Apamée. Essai de mise au point, Paris.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (2018) The Concept of Presocratic Philosophy: Its Origin, Development, and Significance, Princeton.Google Scholar

Lapini, W. (2015) L’ Epistola a Erodoto e il Bios di Epicuro in Diogene Laerzio: Note testuali, esegetiche e metodologiche, Rome.Google Scholar

Lasserre, F. (1991) ‘Anonyme, Commentaire de l’Alcibiade I de Platon’, in Decleva Caizzi, F., Funghi, M. S., Gigante, M., Lasserre, F., and Santoni, A. (eds), Varia papyrologica (Studi e testi per il Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici Greci e Latini, 5), Florence: 7–23.Google Scholar

Lathière, A. M. (1972) ‘Lucrèce traducteur d’Épicure: animus, anima dans le livre 3 et 4 du De rerum natura’, Phoenix 26: 123–33.Google Scholar

Laurand, V. (2014) Stoïcisme et lien social. Enquête autour de Musonius Rufus, Paris.Google Scholar

Laursen, S. (1997) ‘The later parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th book’ Cronache Ercolanesi 27: 5–82.Google Scholar

Lee, E. N. (1978) ‘The sense of an object: Epicurus on seeing and hearing’, in Machamer, P. K. and Turnbull, R. G. (eds.), Studies in Perception: Interrelations in the History of Philosophy and Science, Columbus: 27–59.Google Scholar

Lehoux, D. (1999) ‘All voids great and small, being a discussion of place and void in Strato of Lampsacus’s matter theory’, Apeiron 32: 1–36.Google Scholar

Leith, D. (2015a) ‘Erasistratus’ Triplokia of arteries, veins and nerves’, Apeiron 48: 251–62.Google Scholar

Leith, D. (2015b) ‘Elements and uniform parts in early Alexandrian medicine’, Phronesis 60: 462–91.Google Scholar

Leone, G. (ed.) (2012) Epicuro, Sulla natura: Libro II, Naples.Google Scholar

Lesky, E. (1950) Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren in der Antike und ihr Nachwirken, Mainz.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (2002) ‘L’âme et le moi en les Tusculanes’, Revue des Études Latines 80: 78–94.Google Scholar

Lewis, E. (1995) ‘The Stoics on identity and individuation’, Phronesis 40: 89–108.Google Scholar

Lewis, O. (2017) Praxagoras of Cos on Arteries, Pulse and Pneuma, Leiden-Boston.Google Scholar

Liddell, H. G. and Scott, R. (1966) A Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1983) Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1988) ‘Scholarship, authority and argument in Galen’s Quod animi mores’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), Le opere psicologiche di Galeno, Naples: 11–42.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991) ‘Alcmaeon and the early history of dissection’, in Methods and Problems in Greek Science, Cambridge: 164–93.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1975–6) ‘Heraclitus and Stoicism’, Philosophia 5–6: 133–56; repr. in Stoic Studies, Cambridge, 1996: 35–57.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1982) ‘Soul and body in Stoicism’, Phronesis 27: 34–57; repr. in Stoic Studies, Cambridge, 1996: 224–49.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1996) Stoic Studies, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1999) ‘Stoic psychology’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: 560–84.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2012) ‘The self in the Meditations’, in Van Ackeren, M. (ed.), A Companion to Marcus Aurelius, Oxford: 465–80.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2013) ‘Heraclitus on measure and the explicit emergence of rationality’, in Sider, D. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, Berlin and Boston: 201–23.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, Volume 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, Volume 2: Greek and Latin Texts with Notes and Bibliography, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Longrigg, J. (1975) ‘Elementary physics in the Lyceum and Stoa’, Isis 66: 211–29.Google Scholar

Lonie, I. M. (1964) ‘Erasistratus, the Erasistrateans, and Aristotle’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 38: 426–43.Google Scholar

Lonie, I. M. (1981) The Hippocratic Treatises ‘On Generation’, ‘On the Nature of the Child’, ‘Diseases IV’: A Commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar

Lucarini, C. M. and Moreschini, C. (eds.) (2010) Hermias Alexandrinus: In Platonis Phaedrum Scholia, Berlin.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, P. (2007) A Philosophical Commentary on Aristotle’s De spiritu, PhD dissertation, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Magee, J. (2016) Calcidius: On Plato’s Timaeus, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Magris, A. (ed.) (2012) ‘Ippolito’: Confutazione di tutte le eresie, intro. by E. Castelli, Brescia.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1975) ‘Alcmaeon: ‘Physikos’ or Physician? With some remarks on Calcidius’ ‘On Vision’ compared to Galen, Plac. Hipp. Plat. VII’, in Mansfeld, J. and de Rijk, L. M. (eds.), Kephalaion: Studies in Greek Philosophy and its Continuation Offered to Professor C. J. de Vogel, Assen: 26–38.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1989) ‘Chrysippus and the “Placita”’, Phronesis 34: 311–42; repr. in Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Volume Three: Studies in the Doxographical Traditions of Ancient Philosophy, Leiden, 2010: 125–57.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1990) ‘Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the ‘Placita’ in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. Principat 36.4, Berlin: 3056–229.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992) ‘The idea of the will in Chrysippus, Posidonius and Galen’, in Cleary, J. and Wians, W. (eds.), Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Lanham: 107–45.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2002) ‘Cosmic distances: Aëtius 2. 31 Diels and some related texts’, in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds), Le style de la pensée. Recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig, Paris: 429–63.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2009) ‘Soul, senses, semen: Aristotelian, Lucretian, Stoic sequences’, in Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, Volume Two: The Compendium, Part One, Leiden: 139–53.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2015) ‘Parmenides from right to left’, Études platoniciennes 12, http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/699 [accessed 2 October 2018].Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2016) ‘Aristotle in the Aëtian Placita’, in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden: 299–318.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (1997) Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, Volume One: The Sources (Philosophia antiqua, 73), Leiden.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (2009) Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, Volume Two: The Compendium, 2 vols. (Philosophia antiqua, 114), Leiden.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (2010) Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, Volume Three: Studies in the Doxographical Traditions of Ancient Philosophy (Philosophia antiqua, 118), Leiden.Google Scholar

Manuli, P. (1986) ‘Traducibilità e moteplicità dei linguaggi nel De placitis di Galeno’, in Cambiano, G. (ed.), Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, Turin: 245–65.Google Scholar

Manuli, P. (1988) ‘La passione nel De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), Le opere psicologiche di Galeno, Naples: 185–214.Google Scholar

Manuli, P. (1993) ‘Galen and Stoicism’, in Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D. (eds.), Galen und das hellenistische Erbe, Stuttgart: 53–61.Google Scholar

Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (1977) Cuore, sangue e cervello: Biologia e antropologia nel pensiero antico. In appendice: Galeno e l’antropologia platonica, Milan.Google Scholar

Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (eds) (1988) Le opere psicologiche di Galeno, Naples.Google Scholar

Marchant, E. C. and Todd, O. J. (2013) Xenophon: Memorabilia. Oeconomicus. Symposium. Apology, revised by J. Henderson, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Marechal, P. (2019) ‘Galen’s constitutive materialism’, Ancient Philosophy 39: 191–209.Google Scholar

Martone, L. I. (2014) Giamblico. De anima. I frammenti, la dottrina (Grece, arabo, latino. Le vie del sapere, Studi, 3), Pisa.Google Scholar

Masi, F. G. (2015) ‘Dagli occhi alla mente: Il cammino tortuoso degli eidola’, in Masi, F. G. and Maso, S. (eds.), Epicurus on Eidola, Peri Phuseos Book II: Update, Proposals, and Discussions, Amsterdam: 107–34.Google Scholar

Masi, F. G. (2016) ‘“A mutual horizon of events”: Epicurus’ Letter to Herodotus between philology and philosophy’, Eirene 52: 485–500.Google Scholar

Masi, F. G. and Verde, F. (2018) ‘Mind in an atomistic world: Epicurus and the Epicurean tradition’, in Sisko, J. (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity: The History of the Philosophy of Mind, Volume 1, London and New York: 236–57.Google Scholar

Masi, F. G., Maso, S. (eds.) (2015) Epicurus on Eidola, Peri Phuseos Book II: Update, Proposals, and Discussions, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Mayor, J. B. (ed.) (1880) M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum libri tres, Vol. I, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mazzarelli, C. (1985) ‘Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti del medioplatonico Eudoro di Alessandria’, Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 77: 197–209, 535–55.Google Scholar

McConnell, S. (2014) Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mehl, D. (1999) ‘The intricate translation of the Epicurean doctrine of ΨΥΧΗ in Book 3 of Lucretius’, Philologus 143: 272–87.Google Scholar

Meijer, P. A. (2007) Stoic Theology: Proofs for the Existence of the Cosmic God and of the Traditional Gods. Including a Commentary on Cleanthes’ Hymn on Zeus, Delft.Google Scholar

Menghi, M. (ed.) (1988) Tertulliano: L’anima, preface by Vegetti, M., Venice.Google Scholar

Menn, S. (1995) ‘Physics as a virtue’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11: 1–34.Google Scholar

Menn, S. (1999) ‘The Stoic theory of categories’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 215–47.Google Scholar

Merlan, P. (1968) From Platonism to Neoplatonism (3rd edition), The Hague.Google Scholar

Mirrione, C. (2017) Theory and Terminology of Mixture in Galen: The Concepts of Krasis and Mixis in Galen’s Thought, PhD dissertation, Berlin.Google Scholar

Modrak, D. K. W. (2011) ‘Physicalism in Strato’s psychology’, in Desclos, M.-L. and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion, New Brunswick: 383–97.Google Scholar

Montarese, F. (2012) Lucretius and His Sources: A Study of Lucretius, De rerum natura I 635–920, Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Moreau, J. (1939) L’âme du monde de Platon aux Stoïciens, Paris.Google Scholar

Nawar, T. (2017) ‘The Stoics on identity, identification, and peculiar qualities’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 32: 113–59.Google Scholar

Ninci, M. (2016) ‘Corporeal matter, indefiniteness and multiplicity: Plotinus’ critique of Epicurean atomism in Tr. 12 (Enn. II 4) 7.20–8’, in Longo, A. and Taormina, D. P. (eds.), Plotinus and Epicurus: Matter, Perception, Pleasure, Cambridge: 133–59.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1978) Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Text with Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays, Princeton.Google Scholar

Nutton, V. (2013) ‘Avoiding distress’, in Singer, P. N. (ed.), Galen: Psychological Writings, Cambridge: 43–106.Google Scholar

Nuyens, A. (1948) L’évolution de la psychologie d’Aristote, trans. A. Mansion, Louvain.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. and Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1991) ‘Diogenes of Babylon: The Stoic sage in the city of the fools’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 32.4: 355–96.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2004) ‘Plutarch’s De animae procreatione in Timaeo: Manipulation or search for consistency?’ in Adamson, P., Baltussen, H. and Stone, M. W. F. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries I (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement, 83.1), London: 137–62.Google Scholar

Paratore, E. (1960) L’Epicureismo e la sua diffusione nel mondo latino, Rome.Google Scholar

Parker, H. N. (2007) Censorinus: The Birthday Book, Chicago.Google Scholar

Pease, A. S. (1973) Marci Tulli Ciceronis De Divinatione Libri Duo, Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Peck, A. L. (1979) Aristotle XIII: Generation of Animals, London.Google Scholar

Petit, C. (ed.) 2019, Galen’s Treatise Peri Alupias (De indolentia) in Context, Leiden.Google Scholar

Philippson, R. (1930) ‘Das Sittlichschöne bei Panaitios’, Philologus 85.4: 357–413.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. (2002) ‘Plato’s psychogonia in later Platonism’, Classical Quarterly 52: 231–47.Google Scholar

Piergiacomi, E. (2019) ‘Gli Epicurei romani sulla medicina: Senocle, Alessandro, Zopiro e Lucrezio’ Ciceroniana on line 3: 191–228.Google Scholar

Pietrobelli, A. (2013) ‘Galien agnostique: un texte caviardé par la tradition’, Revue des études grecques 126: 103–35.Google Scholar

Pizzani, U. (1979) ‘La distinzione lucreziana tra animus e anima e i suoi antecedenti latini’, in Studi di poesia latina in onore di Antonio Traglia, Vol. 1, Rome: 229–52.Google Scholar

Podolak, P. (2010) Soranos von Ephesos, ΠΕΡΙ ΨΥΧΗΣ: Sammlung der Testimonien, Kommentar und Einleitung, with J. E. Heßler, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Podolak, P. and Moreschini, C. (eds.) (2010) Tertulliano, Opere dottrinali: L’anima, La resurrezione della carne, Contro Prassea, Rome.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. (1934) Antikes Führertum: Cicero de officiis und das Lebensideal des Panaitios, Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar

Polito, R. (1994) ‘Il trattato De anima di Tertulliano e i quattro libri sull’anima di Sorano’ Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 49: 423–69.Google Scholar

Polito, R. (2006) ‘Matter, medicine, and the mind: Asclepiades vs. Epicurus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 285–335.Google Scholar

Poppelreuter, H. (1892) Zur Psychologie des Aristoteles, Theophrast, Strato, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Preus, A. (1970) ‘Science and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, Journal of the History of Biology 3: 1–52.Google Scholar

Prost, F. (2001) ‘La psychologie de Panétius: réflexions sur l’évolution du stoïcisme à Rome et la valeur du témoignage de Cicéron’, Revue des études latines 79: 37–53.Google Scholar

Prost, F. (2004) Les Théories hellénistiques de la douleur, Louvain.Google Scholar

Puglia, E. (1983) ‘Demetrio Lacone a Mileto’, Cronache Ercolanesi 13: 21–4.Google Scholar

Puglia, E. (ed.) (1988), Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali ed esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), Naples.Google Scholar

Rackham, H. (1933) Cicero: On the Nature of the Gods. Academics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Rapp, C. (2006) ‘Interaction of body and soul: What the Hellenistic philosophers saw and Aristotle avoided’, in King, R. A. H. (ed.), Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, Berlin and New York: 187–208.Google Scholar

Rashed, M. (2016) ‘Posidonius on matter, body, and surface’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte Sonderheft 13: 323–44.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. (1926) Kosmos und Sympathie. Neue Untersuchungen über Poseidonios, Munich.Google Scholar

Renna, E. (1992) ‘Il ruolo del ΛΟΓΙΣΜΟΣ in Ippocrate e Demetrio Lacone (PHerc. 1055)’, Papyrologica Lupiensia 1: 161–4.Google Scholar

Repici, L. (1988) La natura e l’anima: Saggi su Stratone de Lampsaco, Turin.Google Scholar

Repici, L. (2008) ‘Il pensiero dell’anima in Epicuro e Lucrezio’, in Alesse, F., Aronadio, F., Dalfino, M. C., Simeoni, L., and Spinelli, E. (eds.), Anthropine Sophia: Studi di filologia e storiografia filosofica in memoria di Gabriele Giannantoni, Naples: 379–406.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (1997) ‘Posidonius and the “Timaeus”: Off to Rhodes and back to Plato?’, The Classical Quarterly 47: 455–76.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (1999) Demiurge and Providence: Stoics and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus, Monothéismes et Philosophie, Turnhout.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (2005) The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection, Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Rist, J. M. (1969) Stoic Philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rist, J. M. (1978) The Stoics, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

Rodier, G. (1890) La Physique de Straton, Paris.Google Scholar

Rose, V. (1854) De Aristotelis librorum ordine et auctoritate, Berlin.Google Scholar

Rosella Schluderer, L. (2014) Microcosm and macrocosm in Philolaus and Plato’s Philebus: The metaphysics of harmonic structure, PhD dissertation, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Roselli, A. (1988) ‘Citazioni ippocratiche in Demetrio Lacone (PHerc. 1012)’, Cronache Ercolanesi 18: 53–7.Google Scholar

Roselli, A. (1990) ‘Appunti per una storia dell’uso apologetico della filologia: La nuova edizione di Demetrio Lacone (PHerc. 1012)’, Studi Classici e Orientali 11: 117–38.Google Scholar

Roselli, A. (1992) [Aristotele] De spiritu, Pisa.Google Scholar

Rosen, R. (2009) ‘Socratism in Galen’s psychological works’, in Brockmann, C., Brunschön, W., and Overwien, O. (eds.), Antike Medizin im Schnittpunkt von Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften, Berlin: 155–71.Google Scholar

Ross, D. (1961) Aristotle, De anima, Oxford.Google Scholar

Rudberg, G. (1951) ‘Stratonica’, Eranos 49: 31–4.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (2018) ‘Epicurus and the Placita’, in Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Aëtiana IV: Papers of the Melbourne Colloquium on Ancient Doxography, Leiden and Boston: 377–432.Google Scholar

Salem, J. (1993) Commentaire de la Lettre d’Épicure à Hérodote, Brussels.Google Scholar

Sallmann, N. (ed.) (1983) Censorini de die natali liber, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1969) Plutarch’s Moralia XV, London.Google Scholar

Sanders, K. (2011) ‘Strato on “microvoid”’, in Desclos, M.-L. and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion, New Brunswick: 263–76.Google Scholar

Sanders, K. R. (2008) ‘Mens and emotion: De Rerum Natura 3.136–46’, The Classical Quarterly 58: 362–6.Google Scholar

Scalas, G. (2015) ‘“Le anime sono sangue” (Ref. I 22, 5 = 340 Usener): Una testimonianza ‘ippolitea’ sulla psicologia di Epicuro’, Lexicon Philosophicum 3: 199–226, http://lexicon.cnr.it/index.php/LP/article/view/456 [accessed 2 October 2018].Google Scholar

Schiefsky, M. (2012) ‘Galen and the tripartite soul’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.), Plato and the Divided Self, Cambridge: 331–49.Google Scholar

Schmekel, A. (1892) Die Philosophie der mittleren Stoa in ihrem geschichtlichen Zusammenhange, Berlin.Google Scholar

Schmekel, A. (1938) Die positive Philosophie in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Vol. 1, Berlin.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28: 31–58.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (2002) ‘Philo and Cicero’s Tusculans’, in Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (eds.), Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin, Oxford: 91–107.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (2009) ‘Ciceronian dialogue’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, Cambridge: 63–84.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) (1986) The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (1982) ‘The Stoic criterion of identity’, Phronesis 27: 255–75.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (1999) ‘Hellenistic physics and metaphysics’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: 355–411.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1987) ‘Philoponus’ conception of space’, in Sorabji, R (ed.), Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science, London: 140–53.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1993) ‘Chrysippus on psychophysical causality’, in J. Brunschwig, and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, Cambridge: 313–31.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2002) ‘The origins of Stoic god’, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology, Leiden: 41–83.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2003) ‘The school, from Zeno to Arius Didymus’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge and New York: 7–32.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2007) Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1989) ‘Strato of Lampsacus’ (Review of Luciana Repici, La natura e l’anima: saggi su Stratone di Lampsaco), The Classical Review 39: 261–2.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1995) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought and Influence Commentary, Vol. 5: Sources on Biology, Leiden.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2011) ‘Strato of Lampsacus: The sources, texts and translations’, in Desclos, Marie-Laurence and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion, New Brunswick: 5–229.Google Scholar

Shearin, W. H. (2014) ‘Concealed pleasure: Lucretius, De Rerum Natura 3.237–42’, The Classical Quarterly 64: 183–96.Google Scholar

Sider, D. and Obbink, D. (eds.) (2013) Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. (1997) ‘Levels of explanation in Galen’, Classical Quarterly 47: 525–42.Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. (ed.) (2013) Galen: Psychological Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. (2014) ‘Galen and the philosophers: Philosophical engagement, shadowy contemporaries, Aristotelian transformations’, in Adamson, P., Hansberger, R., and Wilberding, J. (eds.), Philosophical Themes in Galen, London: 7–38.Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. (2017) ‘The essence of rage: Galen on emotional disturbances and their physical correlates’, in Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., Wright, M., and Gill, C. J. (eds.), Selfhood and the Soul, Oxford: 161–96.Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. (2018) ‘Galen’s pathological soul: Diagnosis and therapy in ethical and medical texts and contexts’, in Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.), Medical Conceptions of Mental Illness, from Celsus to Caelius Aurelianus, Leiden: 381–420.Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. and van der Eijk, P. J. (2018) Galen: Works on Human Nature, Volume One: Mixtures, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smith, M. F. (ed.) (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, Naples.Google Scholar

Solmsen, F. (1942) ‘Eratosthenes as Platonist and poet’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 73: 192–213.Google Scholar

Solmsen, F. (1961) ‘Greek philosophy and the discovery of the nerves’, Museum Helveticum 18: 150–97.Google Scholar

Solmsen, F. (1968) Kleine Schriften, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. R. K. (1993) Animals Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. (2016) ‘“L’âme aussi est insaisissable …”: Sextus Empiricus et la question psychologique’, in Galand, P., Malaspina, E. et al. (eds.), Vérité et apparence: Mélanges en l’honneur de Carlos Lévy, offerts par ses amis et ses disciples, Turnhout: 551–62.Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. and Verde, F. (2014) ‘Alle radici del libero arbitrio? Aporie e soluzioni nelle filosofie ellenistiche’, in De Caro, M., Mori, M., and Spinelli, E. (eds.), Libero arbitrio: Storia di una controversia filosofica, Rome: 59–98.Google Scholar

Steckerl, F. (1958) The Fragments of Praxagoras of Cos and His School, Leiden.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, P. (1994) ‘Panaitios aus Rhodos und seine Schüler’, in Erler, M. et al. (eds.), Die Philosophie der Antike, 4: Die hellenistische Philosophie, Basel: 646–69.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2015) ‘La psicologia di Celso’, Technai 8: 47–69.Google Scholar

Stover, J. A. (ed.) (2016) A New Work by Apuleius: The Lost Third Book of the ‘De Platone’, Oxford.Google Scholar

Striker, G. (1996) Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Susemihl, F. (1891) Griechische Literatur in der Alexandrinerzeit, Vol. 1, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Tarán, L. (1981) Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary (Philosophia antiqua, 39), Leiden.Google Scholar

Tatakis, B. N. (1931) Panétius de Rhodes. Le fondateur du Moyen Stoïcisme. Sa vie et son œuvre. Paris.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. E. (1928) A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Theiler, W. (1982) Posidonius. Die Fragmente (Texte und Kommentare, 10), Berlin.Google Scholar

Thesleff, H. (1965) The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period (Acta Academiae Aboensis, Ser. A, Humaniora, 30.1), Åbo.Google Scholar

Thévenaz, P. (1938) L’Âme du monde, le devenir et la matière chez Plutarque. Avec une traduction du traité ‘De la Genèse de l’Âme dans le Timée’ (1re partie) (Collection d’Études anciennes), Neuchâtel.Google Scholar

Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.) (2018) Medical Conceptions of Mental Illness, from Celsus to Caelius Aurelianus, Leiden.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (1991) ‘Diogenes of Babylon and Stoic embryology. Ps. Plutarch, Plac. V 15.4 reconsidered’, Mnemosyne 44: 106–25.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (1996) Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis, Books II–III, Leiden.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (2003a) Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation (Philosophia antiqua, 94), Leiden.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (2003b) ‘Galen’s psychology’, in Barnes, J., Jouanna, J., and Barras, V. (eds.), Galien et la philosophie (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique de la Fondation Hardt, 49), Vandoeuvres and Geneva: 131–69.Google Scholar

Toulouse, S. (2005) ‘Les sciences et l’âme chez Posidonius. Remarques sur une définition de l’âme conservée dans Plutarque et sur le statut de l’astronomie et des mathématiques dans sa philosophie’, in Romeyer Dherbey, G. and Gourinat, J.-B. (eds.), Les stoïciens (Bibliothèque d’histoire de la philosophie, nouvelle série), Paris: 153–72.Google Scholar

Trompeter, J. (2016) ‘Die gespannte Seele: Tonos bei Galen’, Phronesis 61: 82–109.Google Scholar

Ulacco, A. (2016) ‘The appropriation of Aristotle in Ps-Pythagorean treatises’, in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden: 202–17.Google Scholar

Ulacco, A. (2017) Pseudopythagorica dorica: i trattati di argomento metafisico, logico ed epistemologico attribuiti ad Archita e a Brotino. Introduzione, traduzione, commento (Philosophie der Antike. Veröffentlichungen der Karl und Gertrud Abel-Stiftung, 41), Boston.Google Scholar

Untersteiner, M. (1970) Posidonio nei placita di Platone secondo Diogene Laerzio III (Antichità classica e cristiana, 7), Brescia.Google Scholar

Vallance, J. T. (1990) The Lost Theory of Asclepiades of Bithynia, Oxford.Google Scholar

Van Ackeren, M. (ed.) (2012) A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Oxford.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. (1997) ‘The matter of mind: Aristotle on the biology of ‘psychic’ processes and the bodily aspects of thinking’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie. Intentionen. Methoden. Ergebnisse, Stuttgart: 231–58, repr. in van der Eijk (2005a): 206–37.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. (1999) ‘On Sterility (‘HA X’), A medical work by Aristotle?’, Classical Quarterly 49: 490–502; repr. in van der Eijk, , Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge: 259–75.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. (2000) Diocles of Carystus: A Collection of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary, 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. (2005a) Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. (2005b) ‘Between the Hippocratics and the Alexandrians: Medicine, philosophy and science in the fourth century bce’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, London: 72–109.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. (2005c) Philoponus: On Aristotle on the Soul 1.1–2, London.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. and Francis, S. (2009) ‘Aristoteles, Aristotelismus und antike Medizin’, in Brockmann, C., Brunschön, W., and Overwien, O. (eds.), Antike Medizin im Schnittpunkt von Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften, Berlin: 213–33.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. J. (2006) Philoponus: On Aristotle on the Soul 1.3–5, London.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. J. (2009) ‘“Aristotle! What a thing for you to say!” Galen’s engagement with Aristotle and Aristotelians’, in Gill, C. J., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge: 261–81.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. J. (2011) ‘Modes and degrees of soul-body relationship in On Regimen’, in Perilli, L. et al. (eds.), Officina Hippocratica, Berlin: 255–70.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. J. (2013) ‘Cure and (in)curability of mental disorders in ancient medical and philosophical thought’, in Harris, W. V. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden: 307–38.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. J. (2014) ‘Galen on the nature of human beings’, in Adamson, P., Hansberger, R., and Wilberding, J. (eds.), Philosophical Themes in Galen, London: 89–134.Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. J. (2015) ‘Galen on the assessment of bodily mixtures’ in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D. (eds.), The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, Berlin, Munich, and Boston: 675–98.Google Scholar

Van Straaten, M. (1946) Panétius, sa vie, ses écrits et sa doctrine avec une édition des fragments, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Van Straaten, M. (1952) Panaetii Rhodi Fragmenta, Leiden.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. (1984) ‘La terapia dell’anima. Patologia e disciplina del soggetto in Galeno’, in Menghi, M. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), Galeno: Le passioni e gli errori dell’ anima. Opere morali, Venice: 131–55.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. (1993) ‘I nervi dell’ anima’, in Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D. (eds.), Galen und das Hellenistische Erbe: Verhandlungen des IV. Internationalen Galen-Symposiums, Stuttgart: 63–77.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. (1998) ‘Between knowledge and practice: Hellenistic medicine’, in Grmek, M. D. and Fantini, B. (eds.), Western Medical Thought from Antiquity to the Middle Ages, trans. A. Shugaar, Cambridge, MA: 72–103.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. (1999a) ‘Historiographical strategies in Galen’s physiology (De usu partium, De naturalibus facultatibus)’, in van der Eijk, P. (ed.), Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity, Leiden: 383–95.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. (1999b) ‘Tradition and truth: forms of philosophical-scientific historiography in Galen’s De Placitis’, in van der Eijk, P. (ed.), Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity, Leiden: 333–57.Google Scholar

Veillard, C. (2015) Les Stoïciens II. Le stoïcisme intermédiaire: Diogène de Babylonie, Panétius de Rhodes, Posidonius d’Apamée, Paris.Google Scholar

Verbeke, G. (1978) ‘Doctrine du pneuma et entéléchisme chez Aristote’, in Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum, Cambridge: 191–214.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (ed.) (2010) Epicuro: Epistola a Erodoto, introduction by Spinelli, E., Rome.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2013) Epicuro, Rome.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2015a) ‘Monismo psicologico e dottrina dell’anima in Epicuro e Lucrezio’, in Canone, E. (ed.), Anima-corpo alla luce dell’etica: Antichi e moderni, Florence: 49–64.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2015b) ‘Kepos e Peripatos a partire dal II libro Sulla natura di Epicuro: La testimonianza di Macrobio’, in Masi, F. G. and Maso, S. (eds.), Epicurus on Eidola, Peri Phuseos Book II: Update, Proposals, and Discussions, Amsterdam: 151–70.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2016a) ‘Aristotle and the garden’, in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden: 35–55.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2016b) ‘Percezione, errore e residuo percettivo in Aristotele, Epicuro e Alessandro di Afrodisia’, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 97: 44–62.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2017a) ‘Gli Epicurei e la psicologia di Epicuro’, in Alesse, F., Fermani, A., and Maso, S. (eds.), Studi su ellenismo e filosofia romana, Rome: 33–64.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2017b) ‘Accio, Lucrezio e la psicologia di Epicuro: Osservazioni su Trag. 296 R.³ (589 Dangel)’, Museum Helveticum 74: 158–71.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2017c) ‘Lucretius and His De Rerum Natura six centuries after: A conversation with David Sedley’, Lexicon Philosophicum 5: 189–19, http://lexicon.cnr.it/index.php/LP/article/view/517%5D [accessed 2 October 2018].Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2017d) ‘Due postille a Demetrio Lacone (PHerc. 1012, col. XLVI 7–8 Puglia) e Filotimo (2 Steckerl)’, Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 145: 381–91.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2018) ‘Once again on Epicurus’ Letter to Herodotus §§ 39–40’, Classical Quarterly 63.2: 736–9.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (forthcoming) ‘I Kanonika di Antioco di Ascalona e Asclepiade di Bitinia (Sext. Emp. M VII 200–202)’ Rheinisches Museum für Philologie.Google Scholar

Viano, C. (1996) ‘La doxographie du De anima (I, 2–5) ou le contre-modèle de l’âme’, in Romeyer Dherbey, G. and Viano, C. (eds.), Corps et âme. Sur le De anima d’Aristote (Bibliothèque d’histoire de la philosophie), Paris: 51–79.Google Scholar

Viano, C. (2006) La matière des choses. Le livre IV des Météorologiques d’Aristote et son interprétation par Olympiodore, Paris.Google Scholar

Vimercati, E. (2004) Posidonio. Testimonianze e frammenti. Milan.Google Scholar

Vinkesteijn, R (2019) ‘Mixing body and soul: Galen on the substance of soul in QAM and De Propriis Placitis’ Phronesis 64: 1–23Google Scholar

von Staden, H. (1989) Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria, Cambridge.Google Scholar

von Staden, H. (1992) ‘Jaeger’s “Skandalon der historischen Vernunft”: Diocles, Aristotle, and Theophrastus’, in Calder, W. M. III (ed.), Werner Jaeger Reconsidered, Atlanta: 227–65.Google Scholar

von Staden, H. (1997) ‘Teleology and mechanism: Aristotelian biology and early Hellenistic medicine’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart: 183–208.Google Scholar

von Staden, H. (1998) ‘Andréas de Caryste et Philon de Byzance: médecine et mécanique à Alexandrie’, in Argoud, G. and Guillaumin, J.-Y. (eds.), Sciences exactes et sciences appliquées à Alexandrie, Saint-Étienne: 147–72.Google Scholar

von Staden, H. (2000) ‘Body, soul, and nerves: Epicurus, Herophilus, Erasistratus, the Stoics, and Galen’, in Wright, J. P. and Potter, P. (eds.), Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment, Oxford: 79–116.Google Scholar

von Staden, H. (2012) ‘The physiology and therapy of anger: Galen on medicine, the soul, and nature’, in Opwis, F. and Reisman, D. (eds.), Islamic Philosophy, Science, Culture, and Religion: Studies in Honor of Dimitri Gutas, Leiden: 63–87.Google Scholar

Wald, L. (1968) ‘Observations sur l’emploi de animus, anima et mens dans l’oeuvre de Lucrèce’, in Harmatta, J. (ed.), Studien zur Geschichte und Philosophie des Altertums, Amsterdam: 135–44.Google Scholar

Walsh, P. G. (2008) Cicero: The Nature of the Gods, Oxford.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2006) ‘Psychic disharmony: Philoponus and Epicurus on Plato’s Phaedo’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 235–59.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2013) ‘The harm of death in Cicero’s first Tusculan Disputation’, in Stacey Taylor, J. (ed.), The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death: New Essays, Oxford: 44–70.Google Scholar

Wehrli, F. (1950) Die Schule des Aristoteles 5, Basel.Google Scholar

Wellmann, M. (1924) ‘Über Träume’, Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 16: 70–3.Google Scholar

Wessel, S. (2009) ‘The reception of Greek science in Gregory of Nyssa’s De hominis opificio’, Vigiliae Christianae 63: 24–46.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G. (1990) ‘The Alexandrian commentators and the introductions to their commentaries’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and their Influence, Ithaca: 325–48.Google Scholar

White, M. J. (2003) ‘Stoic natural philosophy (physics and cosmology)’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: 124–52.Google Scholar

Woltjer, J. (1877) Lucretii philosophia cum fontibus comparata, Groningen.Google Scholar

Woolf, R. (2015) Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic, London.Google Scholar

Wynne, J. (2015) ‘Learned and wise: Cotta the Sceptic in Cicero’s De Natura Deorum’, OSAP 47: 245–74.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1897) Aristotle and the Early Peripatetics, Vol. 2, trans. B. F. C. Costelloe and J. H. Muirhead, London.Google Scholar

Zeyl, D. J. (2000) Plato: Timaeus, Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar