Ἁbd el-Masīḥ, Yassā. “Letter from a Bishop of al Fayyum.” Bulletin de La Société d‘archéologie Copte 7 (1941): 15–18.Google Scholar

Abrahamyan, A. G. Anania Shirakatsʻu Matenagrutʻyunĕ [The Writings of Anania of Shirak]. Yerevan: HSSṚ Matenadarani Hratarakchʻutʻyun, 1944.Google Scholar

Adler, William and Tuffin, Paul, trans. The Chronography of George Synkellos: A Byzantine Chronicle of Universal History from the Creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Aland, Barbara, Aland, Kurt, Karavidopoulos, Johannes, Martini, Carlo M., and Metzger, Bruce M., eds. Greek New Testament. 5th ed. revised, 3rd corrected printing. Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 2016.Google Scholar

Aland, Kurt, and Aland, Barbara. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Translated by Erroll F. Rhodes. 2nd rev. ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1989.Google Scholar

Alexander, Paul Julius. The Byzantine Apocalyptic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Allatii, Leone. De libris ecclesiasticis Graecorum, dissertationes duae: quarum vna, diuinorum officiorum potiores & vsitatiores libri percensentur: altera, tirodium, pentecostarium, & paracletice examinantur. Paris: Sebastiani, 1644.Google Scholar

Allen, Garrick. Manuscripts of the Book of Revelation: New Philology, Paratexts, Reception. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, Garrick “Paratexts and the Reception History of the Apocalypse.” Journal of Theological Studies 70, no. 2 (2019): 600–32.Google Scholar

Andrew of Caesarea. Andrew of Caesarea: Commentary on the Apocalypse. Translated by Eugenia Scarvelis Constantinou. FC 123. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Apfel, Henrietta V. “Homeric Criticism in the Fourth Century BC.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69 (1938): 245–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/283178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, Jonathan J., trans. Eusebius of Caesarea: Commentary on Isaiah. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Jonathan J. The Role of the Rule of Faith in the Formation of the New Testament Canon According to Eusebius of Caesarea. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Askeland, Christian. “The Sahidic Apocalypse in Early Islamic Egypt.” In Studien zum Text der Apokalypse, edited by Sigismund, Marcus, Karrer, Martin, and Schmid, Ulrich, 271–87. Arbeiten zur Neutestamenilichen Textforschung 47. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar

Assemani, Giuseppe Simone. Bibliotheca orientalis. 3 vols. Rome: Sacra Congregationis de Propaganda Fide, 1719–28. http://s2w.hbz-nrw.de/ulbbn/content/structure/33339.Google Scholar

Assemani, Giuseppe Simone Sancti patris nostri Ephraem Syri Opera omnia quae exstant Graece, Syriace, Latine, in sex tomos distributa. 6 vols. Rome: Vatican, 1732–43.Google Scholar

Aune, David E. Prophecy in Early Christianity and the Ancient Mediterranean World. Grand Rapids, MI: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar

Aune, David E. Revelation. World Biblical Commentary 52a–c. Dallas: Word Books, 1997.Google Scholar

Babbitt, Frank Cole, trans. Plutarch’s Moralia. LCL 197. London: Harvard University Press, 1927.Google Scholar

Babcock, William, trans. Augustine: The City of God (de Civitate Dei). 2 vols. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/7. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Badger, George Percy. The Nestorians and Their Rituals. 2 vols. London: Joseph Masters, 1852. https://archive.org/details/TheNestoriansAndTheirRituals.Google Scholar

Bady, Guillaume. “Did John Chrysostom Quote the Book of Revelation?” BIBLINDEX: Research Notebook and Blog (blog), June 14, 2013. https://biblindex-en.hypotheses.org/127.Google Scholar

Baehrens, W. A., ed. Origenes Werke VI: Homilien zum Hexateuch. GCS 29. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1920.Google Scholar

Baehrens, W. A. ed. Origenes Werke VIII: Homilien zu Samuel I, zum Hohelied, und zu den Propheten; Kommentar zur Hohelied. GCS 33. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1925.Google Scholar

Baltussen, Han. “Philosophers, Exegetes, Scholars.” In Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre, edited by Kraus, Christina S. and Stray, Christopher, 173–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688982.001.0001/acprof-9780199688982-chapter-10.Google Scholar

Baltussen, Han Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology of a Commentator. London: Bloomsbury, 2008.Google Scholar

Bandt, Cordula, ed. Der Traktat “Vom Mysterium der Buchstaben”: Kritischer Text mit Einführung, Übersetzung und Anmerkungen. Der Traktat “Vom Mysterium der Buchstaben.” Texte und Untersuchungen 162. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007. https://www.degruyter.com/view/title/30708.Google Scholar

Banterle, Gabriele. San filastrio di brescia: delle varie eresie. Rome: Città Nuova, 1991.Google Scholar

Barkeley, Gary Wayne, trans. Origen: Homilies on Leviticus 1–16. FC 83. Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. Athanasius and Constantius: Theology and Politics in the Constantinian Empire. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. “The Editions of Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 21, no. 2 (1980): 191–201.Google Scholar

Barone, Francesca Prometea. “Pour une édition critique de la Synopsis Scripturae Sacrae du Pseudo-Jean Chrysostome.” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 83, no. 1 (2009): 7–19.Google Scholar

Barsoum, Ignatius Aphrem. The Scattered Pearls: A History of Syriac Literature and Sciences. Translated by Matti Mousa. 2nd rev. ed. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2003.Google Scholar

Barton, John. Holy Writings, Sacred Text: The Canon in Early Christianity. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. Climax of Prophecy: Studies on the Book of Revelation. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1993.Google Scholar

Beale, Gregory K. John’s Use of the Old Testament in Revelation. London and New York: Bloomsbury/T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar

Behm, J. and Quell, G.. “Διατιθήμι, Διαθήκη.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Kittel, Gerhard, Friedrich, Gerhard, and Bromiley, Geoffrey William, vol. 2: Delta–Eta, edited by Kittel, Gerhard and Friedrich, Gerhard, 104–34. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1964.Google Scholar

Behr, Jonathan, ed. Origen: On First Principles. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Behr, Jonathan trans. St. Irenaeus of Lyons: On the Apostolic Preaching. Popular Patristics 17. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Berger, Adolf. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1953.Google Scholar

Betegh, Gábor. The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsall, J. N. “Georgian Studies and the New Testament.” New Testament Studies 29, no. 3 (July 1983): 306–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500006020.Google Scholar

Birdsall, J. N. “The Georgian Version of the Book of Revelation.” Le Muséon 91 (1978): 355–66.Google Scholar

al-Birmāwī, al-Qummuṣ Armāniyūs Ḥabashī Shattā, ed. Tafsīr Sifr al-Ru’yā li-l-Qiddīs Yūḥannā al-Lahūtī li-Ibn Kātib Qayṣar. Cairo: Maktabat al-Maḥabbah, 1939.Google Scholar

Bishop, Caroline. “Hipparchus among the Detractors?” In Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre, edited by Kraus, Christina Shuttleworth and Stray, Christopher, 379–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Blanc, Cécile, ed. Origène: Commentaire sur saint Jean. 5 vols. SC 120, 157, 222, 290, 385. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1966–92.Google Scholar

von Blumenthal, Albrecht, trans. Arethas von Caesarea: Kommentar zur Offenbarung des Johannes. Berlin: Logos Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar

Bokedal, Tomas. “The Rule of Faith: Tracing its Origins.” Journal of Theological Interpretation 7, no. 2 (2013): 233–55.Google Scholar

Bolmarcich, Sarah. “The Afterlife of a Treaty.” Classical Quarterly 57, no. 2 (2007): 477–89.Google Scholar

Bonwetsch, Gottlieb Nathanael, and Achelis, Hans, eds. Hippolytus Werke I. GCS 1. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1897.Google Scholar

Borgen, Peder. “Philo: An Interpreter of the Laws of Moses.” In Reading Philo: A Handbook to Philo of Alexandria, edited by Seland, Torrey, 75–101. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/yale-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4859220.Google Scholar

Boulding, Maria, trans. Augustine: Expositions of the Psalms 1–32. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century III/15. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bousset, Wilhelm. Die Offenbarung Johannis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovon, François. “Beyond the Canonical and the Apocryphal Books, the Presence of a Third Category: The Books Useful for the Soul.” Harvard Theological Review 105, no. 2 (2012): 125–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816012000466.Google Scholar

Boxall, Ian. Patmos in the Reception History of the Apocalypse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

“Reception History of the Bible.” In The New Cambridge History of the Bible, vol. 4: From 1750 to the Present, edited by Riches, John, 172–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

“Reception History and the Interpretation of Revelation.” In Oxford Handbook of the Book of Revelation, edited by Koester, Craig. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. “Old Wine in New Bottles: Intertextuality and Midrash.” Poetics Today 8, no. 3/4 (1987): 539–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772567.Google Scholar

Brady, David. “The Book of Revelation and the Qur’an: Is there a Possible Literary Relationship?” Journal of Semitic Studies 23, no. 2 (1978): 216–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/23.2.216.Google Scholar

Brakke, David. “A New Fragment of Athanasius’s Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter: Heresy, Apocrypha, and the Canon.” Harvard Theological Review 103, no. 1 (2010): 47–66.Google Scholar

Brent, Allen. Hippolytus and the Roman Church in the Third Century: Communities in Tension before the Emergence of a Monarch-Bishop. Leiden: Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brière, Maurice, Mariès, Louis, and Mercier, B.-C, eds. Hippolyte de Rome sur les bénédictions d’Isaac, de Jacob et de Moïse. Patrologia Orientalis 27.1–2. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1957.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian P. “Bardaiṣan.” In Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage: Electronic Edition, edited by Brock, Sebastian P., Butts, Aaron Michael, Kiraz, George Anton, and van Rompay, Lucas, 56–57. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2008; online ed. Beth Mardutho, 2011. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Bardaisan.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian P. Catalogue of Syriac Fragments (New Finds) in the Library of the Monastery of Saint Catherine, Mount Sinai. Athens: Mount Sinai Foundation, 1995.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian P. “Methodius, Apocalypse of Pseudo-.” In Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage: Electronic Edition, edited by Brock, Sebastian P., Butts, Aaron Michael, Kiraz, George Anton, and van Rompay, Lucas, 287. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2008; online ed. Beth Mardutho, 2011. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Methodius-Apocalypse-of-Pseudo-.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian P. “St. Ephrem: A Brief Guide to the Main Editions and Translations.” An annotated bibliography of Syriac resources online. Accessed January 29, 2019. http://syri.ac/brock/ephrem.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian P. trans. St. Ephrem the Syrian: Hymns on Paradise. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Brooks, James A. The New Testament Text of Gregory of Nyssa. The New Testament in the Greek Fathers 2. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Bruns, J. Edgar. “The Altercatio Jasonis et Papisci, Philo, and Anastasius the Sinaite.” Theological Studies 34, no. 2 (1973): 287–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056397303400206.Google Scholar

Bucur, Bogdan Gabriel. Angelomorphic Pneumatology: Clement of Alexandria and Other Early Christian Witnesses. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 95. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Budge, E. A. Wallis, ed. Coptic Apocrypha in the Dialect of Upper Egypt. London: British Museum, 1913. http://archive.org/details/copticapocryphai00budguoft.Google Scholar

Burgess, R. W. “The Dates and Editions of Eusebius’ Chronici Canones and Historia Ecclesiastica.” Journal of Theological Studies 48, no. 2 (October 1, 1997): 471–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/48.2.471.Google Scholar

Burkitt, Francis Crawford. S. Ephraim’s Quotations from the Gospel. Texts and Studies: Contributions to Biblical and Patristic Literature 7.2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1901. http://archive.org/details/sephraimsquotati00burkuoft.Google Scholar

Butterworth, G. W. , trans. Origen: On First Principles Being Koetschau’s Text of the De Principiis. Torchbook edition. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1936.Google Scholar

Califf, David J. “Metrodorus of Lampsacus and the Problem of Allegory: An Extreme Case?” Arethusa 36, no. 1 (February 11, 2003): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2003.0002.Google Scholar

Carroll, Scott T. “An Early Church Sermon against Gambling (CPL 60).” Journal of Early Christian Studies 8, no. 2 (1991): 83–85.Google Scholar

Caspari, Carl Paul. Briefe, Abhandlungen und Predigten aus den zwei letzten Jahrhunderten des kirchlichen Altherthums und dem Anfang des Mittelalters. [Oslo]: n.p., 1890. http://archive.org/details/briefeabhandlung00caspuoft.Google Scholar

Castelo, Daniel, and Wall, Robert W.. Marks of Scripture. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2019.Google Scholar

Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts. “Manuscript Search.” Accessed May 16, 2016. www.csntm.org/Manuscript.Google Scholar

Chabot, Jean-Baptiste, ed. Chronique de Michel le Syrien. 4 vols. Paris: Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 1899. https://archive.org/details/ChroniqueDeMichelLeSyrienT.1Fasc.1translation.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Henry, trans. Origen: Contra Celsum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Champlin, Edward. “Creditur Vulgo Testamenta Hominum Speculum Esse Morum: Why the Romans Made Wills.” Classical Philology 84, no. 3 (1989): 198–215.Google Scholar

Champlin, Edward “The Testament of Augustus.” Rheinisches Museum Für Philologie 132, no. 2 (1989): 154–65.Google Scholar

Chapman, Stephen B. “Second Temple Jewish Hermeneutics: How Canon is not an Anachronism.” In Invention, Rewriting, Usurpation: Discursive Fights over Religious Traditions in Antiquity, edited by Brakke, David, Jacobsen, Anders-Christian, and Ulrich, Jörg, 281–96. Early Christianity in the Context of Antiquity 11. New York: Peter Lang, 2012.Google Scholar

Charles, R. H. , trans. The Chronicle of John, Bishop of Nikiu. London: Williams & Norgate, 1916. http://archive.org/details/JohnOfNikiuChronicle1916.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, James H. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1983–85.Google Scholar

Chase, Michael, trans. Simplicius: On Aristotle Categories 1–4. Ancient Commentators on Aristotle. London: Bloomsbury, 2003.Google Scholar

Childers, Jeff W. “The Bible in Georgian.” In The New Cambridge History of the Bible, vol. 2: From 600 to 1450, edited by Marsden, Richard and Matter, E. Ann, 162–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Chilton, David. The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation. Fort Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Clarysse, Willy. The Petrie Papyri: The Wills. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Collectanae Hellenistica 2. Brussels: Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, 1991.Google Scholar

Collins, Adella Yarbro. “Numerical Symbolism in Jewish and Early Christian Apocalyptic Literature.” In Religion (Hellenistisches Judentum in Römischer Zeit: Philon und Josephus, edited by Haase, Wolfgang, 1221–87. ANRW II.21.2. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1984.Google Scholar

Collins, Adella Yarbro “The Use of Scripture in the Book of Revelation.” In New Perspectives on the Book of Revelation, edited by Collins, Adella Yarbro, 11–32. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 291. Louvain: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar

Colson, F. H., and Whitaker, G. H, trans. Philo in Ten Volumes. 10 vols. LCL. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929–43.Google Scholar

Constantinou, Eugenia Scarvelis, trans. Andrew of Caesarea: Commentary on the Apocalypse. FC 123. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Constantinou, Eugenia Scarvelis “Banned from the Lectionary: Excluding the Apocalypse of John from the Orthodox New Testament Canon.” In The Canon of the Bible and the Apocrypha in the Churches of the East, edited by Hovhanessian, Vahan S., 51–62. Bible in Christian Orthodox Tradition 2. New York: Peter Lang, 2012.Google Scholar

Constantinou, Eugenia Scarvelis “The Canon of Scripture in the Orthodox Church.” In The Canon of the Bible and the Apocrypha in the Churches of the East, edited by Hovhanessian, Vahan S., 1–6. Bible in Christian Orthodox Tradition 2. New York: Peter Lang, 2012.Google Scholar

Constantinou, Eugenia Scarvelis Guiding to a Blessed End: Andrew of Caesarea and His Apocalypse Commentary in the Ancient Church. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Conybeare, Frederick Cornwallis. The Armenian Version of Revelation. London: Text and Translation Society, 1907. http://archive.org/details/armenianversiono00conyuoft.Google Scholar

Cook, David. “Christians and Christianity in Ḥadīth Works before 900.” In Christian–Muslim Relations: A Bibliographical History. Volume 1 (600–900), edited by Thomas, David and Roggema, Barbara, 73–82. Christian–Muslim Relations 11 Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Cook, David “New Testament Citations in Early Ḥadīth Literature and the Question of Early Gospel Translations into Arabic.” In The Encounter of Eastern Christianity with Early Islam, edited by Grypeou, Emmanouela, Swanson, Mark N., and Thomas, David, 1st ed., 185–223. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar

Cook, David Studies in Muslim Apocalyptic. Studies in Late Antiquity and Early Islam 21. Princeton: Darwin Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cooper, Henry R. “The Bible in Slavonic.” In The New Cambridge History of the Bible, vol. 2: From 600 to 1450, edited by Marsden, Richard and Matter, E. Ann, 179–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Cowley, Roger W. The Traditional Interpretation of the Apocalypse of St John in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Cramer, J. A. Catenae graecorum patrum in Novum Testamentum. 8 vols. Oxford: Typographeo Academico, 1844. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015006991890.Google Scholar

Crosby, Lamar, trans. Dio Chrysostom: Discourses 37–60. LCL 376. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946.Google Scholar

Crum, Walter Ewing, and Crawford, James Ludovic Lindsay. Catalogue of the Coptic Manuscripts in the Collection of the John Rylands Library, Manchester. London: Oxford University Press, 1909. http://archive.org/details/cu31924099175329.Google Scholar

Culpepper, R. Alan. John the Son of Zebedee: The Life of a Legend. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Daley, Brian E., ed. Leontius of Byzantium: Complete Works. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Daniel, E. Randolph. “Joachim of Fiore: Patterns of History into the Apocalypse.” In The Apocalypse in the Middle Ages, edited by Emmerson, Richard K. and McGinn, Bernard, 72–88. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen J. “Biblical Interpretation and Alexandrian Episcopal Authority in the Early Christian Fayoum.” In Christianity and Monasticism in the Fayoum Oasis: Essays from the 2004 International Symposium of the Saint Mark Foundation and the Saint Shenouda the Archimandrite Coptic Society in Honor of Martin Krause, edited by Gabra, Gawdat, 45–61. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen J. ed. Catalogue of Coptic and Arabic Manuscripts in the Monastery of the Syrians. Volume 2: Arabic Commentaries and Canons. CSCO 678. Louvain: Peeters, 2020.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen J. Christ Child: Cultural Memories of a Young Jesus. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen J. “Ibn Kātib Qayṣar on Visions, Angels, Prophets, and Dreams.” In Davis, Stephen J., Schmidt, T. C., and Talia, Shawqi, Revelation 1–3 in Christian Arabic Commentary: John’s First Vision and the Letters to the Seven Churches, 22–40. Christian Arabic Texts in Translation 1. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen J. “Introducing an Arabic Commentary on the Apocalypse: Ibn Kātib Qaysar on Revelation.” Harvard Theological Review 101, no. 1 (2008): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Stephen J., and Schmidt, T. C., trans. “Ibn Kātib Qayṣar, Commentary on the Apocalypse of John, Ch. 1–3.” In Davis, Stephen J., Schmidt, T. C., and Talia, Shawqi, Revelation 1–3 in Christian Arabic Commentary: John’s First Vision and the Letters to the Seven Churches, 86–148. Christian Arabic Texts in Translation 1. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Dawson, David. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeSimone, Russell J., trans. Novatian: The Trinity, The Spectacle, Jewish Foods, In Praise of Purity, Letters. FC 67. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Dickey, Eleanor. Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walter, eds. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th ed. Vol. 1. Zürich: Weidmann, 1960.Google Scholar

Dindorf, Ludwig August. Chronicon Paschale. 2 vols. Bonn: Weber, 1832. http://archive.org/details/chroniconpascha00dindgoog.Google Scholar

Dindorf, Wilhelm, and Maass, Ernst, eds. Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem ex codicibus aucta et emendata. 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1875–78. http://archive.org/details/scholiagraecain00homegoog.Google Scholar

bar Ṣalībī, Dionysius. “In Apocalypsim.” In Dionysius Bar Salibi. In Apocalypsim, Actus et Epistulas Catholicas, edited by Jaroslav, Sedláček. CSCO/Scriptores Syri, 53, 60; 18, 20. Paris: E Typographeo Reipublicae, 1909.Google Scholar

Dodd, Erica Cruikshank. “Bahdeidat.” In Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage: Electronic Edition, edited by Brock, Sebastian P., Butts, Aaron Michael, Kiraz, George Anton, and van Rompay, Lucas, 51–52. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2008; online ed. Beth Mardutho, 2011. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Bahdeidat.Google Scholar

Dodge, Bayard, ed. The Fihrist of al-Nadim: A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture. 2 vols. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Dorival, Gilles. “L’apport des Synopses transmises sous le nom d’Athanase et de Jean Chrysostome à la question du Corpus Littéraire de la Bible?” In Qu’est-ce qu’un corpus littéraire? Recherches sur le corpus biblique et les corpus patristiques, edited by Dorival, Gilles, 53–93. Paris: Peeters, 2005.Google Scholar

“Le document synoptique du Barberinianus gr. 317 (III 36).” In Qu’est-ce qu’un corpus littéraire? Recherches sur le corpus biblique et les corpus patristiques, edited by Dorival, Gilles, 95–108. Paris: Peeters, 2005.Google Scholar

Doutreleau, Louis, ed. Didyme l’Aveugle: Sur Zacharie. 3 vols. SC 83–85. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1962.Google Scholar

Drijvers, H. J. W. The Book of the Laws of Countries: Dialogue on Fate of Bardaisan of Edessa. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Dulaey, Martine, ed. Victorin de Poetovio: Sur l’Apocalypse: suivi du fragment chronologique et de La construction du monde. SC 423. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1997.Google Scholar

Edelby, Nagi. “Commentaire de l’Apocalypse de Būlus al-Būšī (évêque du Caire en 1240 ad): étude, édition critique, traduction et index exhaustif.” Ph.D. thesis, Université Saint-Joseph, 2015.Google Scholar

Edgecomb, Kevin. “Victorinus: In Apocalypsin.” Biblicalia. Accessed December 12, 2018. www.bombaxo.com/patristic-stuff/victorinus-in-apocalypsin/.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D. “The New Testament Canon of Didymus the Blind.” Vigiliae Christianae 37, no. 1 (1983): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1583151.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D., and Holmes, Michael W., eds. The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. 1st ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D., and Holmes, Michael W. eds. The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

El-Badawi, Emran. “Syriac and the Qurʾān.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, edited by McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, September 17, 2015. https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-the-quran/syriac-and-the-quran-EQCOM_00608?s.num=8.Google Scholar

Elliger, Karl, and Rudulph, Willhelm, eds. Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia. Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 1997.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. K. “The Distinctiveness of the Greek Manuscripts of the Book of Revelation.” Journal of Theological Studies 48, no. 1 (1997): 116–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/48.1.116.Google Scholar

Emmerson, Richard K. “Introduction: The Apocalypse in Medieval Culture.” In The Apocalypse in the Middle Ages, edited by Emmerson, Richard K. and McGinn, Bernard, 293–332. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Englezakis, Benedict. “An Unpublished Commentary by St Neophytos the Recluse on the Apocalypse.” In Studies on the History of the Church of Cyprus, 4th–20th Centuries, edited by Ioannou, Misael and Ioannou, Silouan, translated by Norman Russell, 105–45. Aldershot: Variorum, 1995.Google Scholar

Erbse, Hartmut, ed. Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Scholia Vetera). 7 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969–88.Google Scholar

Evans, Craig A., Webb, Robert L., and Wiebe, Richard A., eds. Nag Hammadi Texts and the Bible: A Synopsis and Index. New Testament Tools and Studies 18. Leiden: Brill, 1993.Google Scholar

van den Eynde, Ceslas, ed. Commentaire d’Išoʿdad de Merv sur l’Ancien Testament: Isaïe et les Douze. CSCO/Scriptores Syri 303/128(Syr.); 304/129(trans.). Louvain: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1969.Google Scholar

van den Eynde, Ceslas ed. Commentaire d’Išoʿdad de Merv sur l’Ancien Testament: Jérémie, Ézéchiel, Daniel. CSCO/Scriptores Syri 328/146(Syr.); 329/147(trans). Louvain: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1972.Google Scholar

Fabricius, Johann Albert, ed. Bibliotheca graeca. 14 vols. Hamburg: various publishers, 1705–54.Google Scholar

Falls, Thomas. Saint Justin Martyr: The First Apology, The Second Apology, Dialogue with Trypho, Exhortation to the Greeks, Discourse to the Greeks, The Monarchy or the Rule of God. FC 6. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Farag, Mary. What Makes a Church Sacred? Legal and Ritual Perspectives from Late Antiquity (provisional title), Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Farrar, Frederic William. History of Interpretation: Eight Lectures Preached before the University of Oxford in the Year 1885 on the Foundation of the Late Rev. John Bampton. London: Macmillan, 1886.Google Scholar

Ferrua, Antonio, and de Rossi, Giovanni Battista, eds. Inscriptiones Christianae Urbis Romae Septimo Saeculo Antiquiores, Nova Series: Coemeteria Viae Tiburtinae. Vol. 7. Rome: Pont. Institutum Archaeologia Christianae, 1980.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, John. “Last Wills and Testaments in Graeco-Roman Perspective.” In Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honor of Abraham J. Malherbe, edited by Fitzgerald, John, Olbricht, Thomas H., and White, L. Michael, 637–72. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar

Ford, Andrew. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Ford, Andrew “Performing Interpretation: Early Allegorical Exegesis of Homer.” In Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World: The Poetics of Community, edited by Beissinger, Margaret, Tylus, Jane, and Wofford, Susanne, 33–54. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft40000565&chunk.id=d0e1637&toc.depth=1&toc.id=d0e1451&brand=ucpress.Google Scholar

Friesen, Steven J. “A Useful Apocalypse: Domestication and Destabilization in the Second Century.” In New Perspectives on the Book of Revelation, edited by Collins, A. Yarbro, 79–104. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 291. Louvain: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Edmon L. “Origen via Rufinus on the New Testament Canon.” New Testament Studies 62, no. 3 (2016): 461–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688516000060.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Edmon L., and Meade, John D.. The Biblical Canon Lists from Early Christianity: Texts and Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Gamble, Harry Y. The New Testament Canon: Its Making and Meaning. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Gamble, Harry Y. “The New Testament Canon: Recent Research and the Status Quaestionis.” In The Canon Debate, edited by McDonald, Lee Martin and Sanders, James A., 267–94. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar

Gibson, Craig A., ed. Libanius’s Progymnasmata: Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Writings from the Greco-Roman World 27. Atlanta: SBL, 2008.Google Scholar

Gibson, Margaret Dunlop, ed. The Commentaries of Ishoʿdad of Merv, Bishop of Hadatha (c. 850 A.D.) in Syriac and English. 5 vols. Horae Semiticae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911–16.Google Scholar

Gifford, E. H., ed. Eusebii Pamphili Evangelicae Praeparationis. 4 vols. Oxford: Typographeo Academico, 1903. http://archive.org/details/praeparatioevan00giffgoog.Google Scholar

Goswell, Gregory. “The Two Testaments as Covenant Documents.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 62, no. 4 (2019): 677–92.Google Scholar

Graf, Georg. “Arabische Übersetzungen der Apokalypse.” Biblica 10, no. 2 (1929): 170–94.Google Scholar

Graf, Georg Geschichte der Christlichen Arabischen Literatur. 4 vols. Vatican: Biblioteca apostolica vaticana, 1947.Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel W., ed. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Grant, Robert M., and Tracy, David. A Short History of the Interpretation of the Bible. 2nd ed. [Philadelphia]: Fortress Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Graves, David. The Seven Messages of Revelation and Vassal Treaties: Literary Genre, Structure, and Function. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Graziosi, Barbara. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Greer, Rowan A., trans. Origen: An Exhortation to Martyrdom, Prayer and Selected Works. Classics of Western Spirituality. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Gregory, Andrew F., and Tuckett, Christopher M., eds. The Reception of the New Testament in the Apostolic Fathers. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Griffin, Carl W., ed. The Works of Cyrillona. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2016.Google Scholar

de Groote, Marc, ed. Oecvmenii Commentarivs in Apocalypsin. Traditio Exegetica Graeca 8. Louvain: Peeters, 1999.Google Scholar

de Grooth, M. and van Moorsel, P.. “The Lion, the Calf, the Man and the Eagle in Early Christian and Coptic Art.” Bulletin Antieke Beschaving 52–53 (1977–78): 233–45.Google Scholar

Gryson, Roger, ed. Victorini poetovionensis: opera quae supersunt. Corpus Christianorum: Series Latina 5. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.Google Scholar

Gudeman, A. “Λυσεις.” In Paulys Realencyclopädie, vol. 13.2, cols. 2511–29. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1929.Google Scholar

Guéraud, O., and Nautin, Pierre, eds. Origène: Sur le Pâque: Traité inédit publié d’après un papyrus de Toura. Christianisme Antique 2. Paris: Beauchesne, 1979.Google Scholar

Gumerlock, Francis X. “Millennialism and the Early Church Councils: Was Chiliasm Condemned at Constantinople?” Fides et Historia 36, no. 2 (2004): 83–95.Google Scholar

Gumerlock, Francis X., DelCogliano, Mark, and Schmidt, T. C, trans. Cassiodorus, St. Gregory the Great, and Anonymous Greek Scholia: Writings on the Apocalypse. FC 143. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Gumerlock, Francis X. with Francesca Lecchi and Tito Orlandi. Pseudo-Cyril of Alexandria. Commentary on the Apocalypse (provisional title). Middletown, RI: Stone Tower Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Gumerlock, Francis X., and Robinson, David C., trans. Tyconius of Carthage: Exposition of the Apocalypse. FC 134. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Gwynn, John. The Apocalypse of St. John in a Syriac Version Hitherto Unknown, Edited from a MS. in the Library of the Earl of Crawford and Balcarres. Dublin: Hodges, Figgis & Co., 1897. http://archive.org/details/apocalypseofstjo00gwynuoft.Google Scholar

Gwynn, John “Hippolytus and his ‘Heads against Caius.’” Hermathena 6, no. 14 (1888): 397–418.Google Scholar

Hahn, Scott. “Covenant, Oath, and the Aqedah: Διαθήκη in Galatians 3:15–18.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 67, no. 1 (2005): 79–100.Google Scholar

Hakobyan, V. Kanonagirk’ Hayoc’. 2 vols. Yerevan: Gitowt’yownneri, 1964.Google Scholar

de Halleux, Andre, ed. Philoxene de Mabbog: Commentaire du prologue johannique, (Ms. Br. Mus., Add. 14, 534). CSCO/Scriptores Syri 380–81/165–66. Louvain: Secrétariat du CSCO, 1977.Google Scholar

Hausleiter, Johannes, ed. Victorinus Petavionensis, Opera. CSEL 49. Vienna: F. Tempsky, 1916. https://archive.org/stream/victoriniepiscop49victuoft#page/n5/mode/2up.Google Scholar

Heal, Kristian. “Scripture Citations in the Works of Ephrem the Syrian,” March 15, 2018. http://syri.ac/bibliography/228081670.Google Scholar

Heide, Martin. “Die syrische Apokalypse oder Offenbarung an Johannes: Kritische Edition der harklensischen Textzeugen.” In Studien zum Text der Apokalypse II, edited by Sigismund, Marcus and Müller, Darius, 81–187. Arbeiten zur Neutestamentlichen Textforschung 50. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar

Heide, Martin “Die Syrische Johannes Apokalypse: zum Gegenwaertigen Stand der Forschung.” In Die Johannesoffenbarung: ihr Text und ihre Auslegung, edited by Labahn, Michael and Karrer, Martin, 71–81. Arbeiten zur Bibel und ihrer Geschichte 38. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2012.Google Scholar

Heine, Ronald E., trans. The Commentary of Origen on the Gospel of St Matthew. 2 vols. Oxford Early Christian Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Heine, Ronald E. trans. Gregory of Nyssa’s Treatise on the Inscriptions of the Psalms. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Heine, Ronald E. trans. Origen: Commentary on the Gospel According to John: Books 1–10. FC 80. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Heine, Ronald E. trans. Origen: Homilies on Genesis and Exodus. FC 71. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Helm, Rudolf, ed. Eusebius Werke 7.1: Die Chronik des Hieronymus: Hieronymi Chronicon. GCS 24. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1913.Google Scholar

Helm, Rudolf ed. Eusebius Werke 7.2: Die Chronik des Hieronymus: Hieronymi Chronicon. GCS 34. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1926.Google Scholar

Henderson, John B. Scripture, Canon and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Henry, René, ed. Photius: Bibliothèque. 8 vols. Paris: Société d’édition les Belles lettres, 1959–77.Google Scholar

Hernández, Juan. “Andrew of Caesarea and his Reading of Revelation: Catechesis and Paranesis.” In Die Johannesapokalypse: Kontexte – Konzepte – Rezeption, edited by Frey, Jörg, Kelhoffer, James A., and Tóth, Franz, 755–74. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar

Hernández, Juan “The Apocalypse in Codex Alexandrinus: Its Singular Readings and Scribal Habits.” In Scripture and Traditions: Essays on Early Judaism and Christianity in Honor of Carl R. Holladay, edited by Gray, Patrick and O’Day, Gail R., 341–58. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Hernández, Juan “Codex Sinaiticus: An Early Christian Commentary on the Apocalypse?” In Codex Sinaiticus: New Perspectives on the Ancient Biblical Manuscript, edited by Scot McKendrick, David C. Parker, Amy Myshrall, , and O’Hogan, Cillian, 107–26. London: British Library, 2015.Google Scholar

Hernández, Juan “The Relevance of Andrew of Caesarea for New Testament Textual Criticism.” Journal of Biblical Literature 130, no. 1 (2011): 183–96.Google Scholar

Hernández, Juan Scribal Habits and Theological Influences in the Apocalypse: The Singular Readings of Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, and Ephraemi. WUNT II 218. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar

Hernández, Juan “The Textual Criticism of the Apocalypse in the Modern Commentary Tradition: David E. Aune’s Model.” Presented at the SBL, Denver, 2018.Google Scholar

Herzman, Ronald B. “Dante and the Apocalypse.” In The Apocalypse in the Middle Ages, edited by Emmerson, Richard K. and McGinn, Bernard, 398–413. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Hilberg, Isidorus, ed. Sancti Eusebii Hieronymi epistulae: Epistulae CXXI–CLIV. Pars III. CSEL 56.1. Vienna: VÖAW, 1996.Google Scholar

Hill, Charles E. “The Epistula Apostolorum: An Asian Tract from the Time of Polycarp.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 7, no. 1 (1999): 1–53.Google Scholar

Hill, Charles E. The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hill, Charles E. From the Lost Teaching of Polycarp: Identifying Irenaeus’ Apostolic Presbyter and the Author of Ad Diognetum. WUNT 186. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar

Hill, Charles E. “The Marriage of Montanism and Millennialism.” Studia Patristica 26 (1993): 140–46.Google Scholar

Hill, Charles E. Regnum Caelorum: Patterns of Millennial Thought in Early Christianity. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar

Hill, Charles E. “‘The Truth above all Demonstration’: Scripture in the Patristic Period to Augustine.” In The Enduring Authority of the Christian Scriptures, edited by Carson, D. A., 43–88. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar

Hill, Edmund, trans. Saint Augustine: Teaching Christianity (De Doctrina Christiana). The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century 11. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Josef. Die äthiopische Johannes-Apokalypse kritisch untersucht. CSCO/Subsidia 297/33. Louvain: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1969.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Josef Die äthiopische übersetzung der Johannes-Apokalpyse. CSCO/Aethiopici 281/55. Louvain: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1967.Google Scholar

Holl, Karl, ed. Epiphanius (Ancoratus und Panarion). GCS 25, 31, 37. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1915. http://archive.org/details/eusebiuswerke06euse.Google Scholar

Hoover, Jesse A. The Donatist Church in an Apocalyptic Age. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Hoskier, H. C., ed. The Complete Commentary of Oecumenius on the Apocalypse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1928. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/wu.89032349359.Google Scholar

Houghton, H. A. G. The Latin New Testament: A Guide to its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hovhanessian, Vahan. “New Testament Apocrypha and the Armenian Version of the Bible.” In The Canon of the Bible and the Apocrypha in the Churches of the East, edited by Hovhanessian, Vahan, 63–87 (notes pp. 97–105). New York: Peter Lang, 2011.Google Scholar

Hubbes, Laszlo. “Apocalyptic Motifs from the Early Christian Literature and Art: The Book of Revelation and its Contribution to the Formation of an Apocalyptic Art.” In Imagery in the Book of Revelation, edited by Labahn, Michael and Lehtipuu, Outi, 55–78. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 60. Louvain: Peeters, 2011.Google Scholar

Hunter, Richard. “Plato’s Ion and the Origins of Scholarship.” In Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, edited by Matthaios, Stephanos, Montanari, Franco, and Rengakos, Antonios, 27–40. Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volumes 8. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar

Huxley, G. L. “Historical Criticism in Aristotle’s ‘Homeric Questions.’” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy: Archaeology, Celtic Studies, History 79 (1979): 73–81.Google Scholar

Hyvernat, Henricus, ed. Codices coptici photographice expressi: Bibliothecae Pierpont Morgan. Vol. 25. 56 vols. New York: Pierpont Morgan Library, 1922. https://archive.org/stream/PhantoouLibrary/m591%20Combined%20%28Bookmarked%29%20#mode/1up.Google Scholar

Institut für Neutestamentliche Textforschung. “Kurzgefasste Liste.” New Testament Virtual Manuscript Room. Accessed May 16, 2016. http://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/liste.Google Scholar

James, Montague Rhodes. The Apocalypse in Art. London: British Academy, 1931.Google Scholar

Joannou, Périclès-Pierre. Fonti: Disipline Generale Antique (IVe–IXe s.), vol. 2: Les Canons des Pères Grecs. Rome: Grottaferrata, 1963. https://archive.org/details/JoannouFontiDisiplineGeneraleAntiqueIVeIXeS.Vol.2LesCanonsDesPeresGrecs.Google Scholar

Johnston, David. “Succession.” In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, edited by Johnston, David, 199–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Jones, Horace Leonard, trans. Geography of Strabo. 8 vols. LCL 49, 50, 182, 196, 211, 223, 241, 267. London: Heinemann, 1917–32. http://archive.org/details/Strabo08Geography17AndIndex.Google Scholar

Jorgensen, David W. Treasure Hidden in a Field: Early Christian Exegesis of the Gospel of Matthew. Studies of the Bible and its Reception 6. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016.Google Scholar

Jowett, B., trans. The Dialogues of Plato. 3rd ed. Vol. 3. London: Oxford University Press, 1892.Google Scholar

Juckel, Andreas. “Ḥarqlean Version.” In Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage: Electronic Edition, edited by Brock, Sebastian P., Butts, Aaron Michael, Kiraz, George Anton, and van Rompay, Lucas, 188–91. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2008; online ed. Beth Mardutho, 2011. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Harqlean-Version.Google Scholar

Kalantzis, George. Theodore of Mopsuestia: Commentary on the Gospel of John. Strathfield: St Pauls Publications, 2004.Google Scholar

Kamesar, Adam. “Biblical Interpretation in Philo.” In The Cambridge Companion to Philo, edited by Kamesar, Adam, 65–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Karlin-Hayter, Patricia. “Christodoulos: Rule, Testament and Codicil of Christodoulos for the Monastery of St. John the Theologian on Patmos.” In Byzantine Monastic Foundation Documents: A Complete Translation of the Surviving Founders’ Typika and Testaments, edited by Thomas, John and Hero, Angela Constantinides, 564–606. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2000.Google Scholar

Karst, Josef, ed. Armenisches Rechtsbuch. 2 vols. Sempadscher kodex. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner, 1905.Google Scholar

Karst, Josef ed. Eusebius Werke 5: Die Chronik. Aus dem armenischen Übersetzt. Mit textkritischem Kommentar. GCS 20. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1911.Google Scholar

Kelly, John Norman Davidson. Early Christian Creeds. 3rd ed. Norfolk, VA: Continuum, 1972.Google Scholar

Kinzig, Wolfram. “Καινὴ Διαϑήκη: The Title of the New Testament in the Second and Third Centuries.” Journal of Theological Studies 45, no. 2 (1994): 519–44.Google Scholar

Kline, Meredith G. The Structure of Biblical Authority. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1972.Google Scholar

Klostermann, Erich. Analecta zur Septuaginta, Hexapla und Patristik. Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1895.Google Scholar

Klostermann, Erich ed. Origenes Werke X–XII. GCS 38, 40, 41.1, 41.2. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1933. http://archive.org/details/origeneswerkehrs11origuoft.Google Scholar

Koester, Craig R. Revelation: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Yale Bible Commentaries 38A. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Köstenberger, Andreas J., and Kruger, Michael J.. The Heresy of Orthodoxy: How Contemporary Culture’s Fascination with Diversity has Reshaped our Understanding of Early Christianity. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2010.Google Scholar

Kotter, P. Bonifatius, ed. Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos. Vol. 4. Patristische Texte und Studien 22. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981.Google Scholar

Kovacs, Judith. “The Purpose of the Millennium: Perspectives Ancient and Modern on Revelation 20, 1–6.” In New Perspectives on the Book of Revelation, edited by Yarbro Collins, A., 353–75. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 291. Louvain: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar

Kovacs, Judith, and Rowland, Christopher. Revelation: The Apocalypse of Jesus Christ. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Kraus, Thomas J. “‘When Symbols and Figures Become Physical Objects’: Critical Notes about Some of the ‘Consistently Cited Witnesses’ to the Text of Revelation.” In Book of Seven Seals: The Peculiarity of Revelation, its Manuscripts, Attestation, and Transmission, edited by Kraus, Thomas and Sommer, Michael, 51–69. WUNT 363. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.”Google Scholar

Kretschmar, Georg. Die Offenbarung des Johannes: die Geschichte ihrer Auslegung im 1. Jahrtausend. Stuttgart: Calwer Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar

Kruger, Michael J. The Question of Canon: Challenging the Status Quo in the New Testament Debate. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2013.Google Scholar

Kruger, Michael J. “The Reception of the Book of Revelation in the Early Church.” In Book of Seven Seals: The Peculiarity of Revelation, its Manuscripts, Attestation, and Transmission, edited by Kraus, Thomas J. and Sommer, Michael, 159–74. WUNT 363. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar

Kugel, James L. The Bible as it Was. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Kuhn, K. H., ed. A Panegyric on Apollo, Archimandrite of the Monastery of Isaac, by Stephen, Bishop of Heracleopolis Magna. CSCO/Scriptores Coptici 394/39 (text); 395/40 (trans). Louvain: Peeters, 1978.Google Scholar

La Bonnardière, Anne-Marie. “The Canon of Sacred Scripture.” In Augustine and the Bible, edited by Bright, Pamela, 26–40. The Bible through the Ages 2. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999.Google Scholar

de Labriolle, Pierre Champagne. Les sources de l’histoire du montanisme: textes grecs, latins, syriaques, publiés avec une introduction critique, une traduction française, des notes et des “indices.” Collectanea friburgensia: Publications de l’Université de Fribourg (Suisse) nouvelle série, fasc. XV (XXIV de la collection). Fribourg: Librairie de l’Université (O. Gschwend), 1913.Google Scholar

Lamoreaux, John C. “The Provenance of Ecumenius’ Commentary on the Apocalypse.” Vigiliae Christianae 52, no. 1 (1998): 88–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/1584585.Google Scholar

Lane, Edward William. Arabic–English Lexicon. London: Williams & Norgate, 1863.Google Scholar

Lang, U. M. “The Date of the Treatise De Sectis Revisited.” Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica 29 (n.d.): 89–98.Google Scholar

Laourdas, Vasileios, and Westerink, Leendert Gerrit, eds. Photii Patriarchae Constantinopolitani Epistulae et Amphilochia. 6 vols. Leipzig: Teubner, 1983.Google Scholar

Larson, Stan. “The Earliest Syriac Commentary on the Apocalypse: Transcription, Translation and Importance of Brit. Lib. Ms. Add. 17,127.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, 1984.Google Scholar

Lauro, Elizabeth Ann Dively, trans. Origen: Homilies on Judges. FC 119. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lehto, Adam, trans. The Demonstrations of Aphrahat, the Persian Sage. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lejoly, Raymond, ed. Dionysii bar Salibi Enarratio in Ioannem. 4 vols. Dison: Éditions Concile, 1975.Google Scholar

Leloir, Louis, ed. Écrits apocryphes sur les Apôtres: traduction de l’édition arménienne de Venise: 1. Pierre, Paul, André, Jacques, Jean. Corpus Christianorum Series Apocryphorum 3. Turnhout: Brepols, 1986.Google Scholar

Lembke, Markus, Müller, Darius, and Schmid, Ulrich B.. “Introduction.” Translated by Garrick Allen. In Die Apokalypse: Teststellenkollation und Auswertungen, edited by Lembke, Markus, Müller, Darius, Schmid, Ulrich B., and Karrer, Martin, 83*–150*. Text und Textwert der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments 6. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar

Lembke, Markus, Müller, Darius, Schmid, Ulrich B., and Karrer, Martin, eds. Die Apokalypse: Teststellenkollation und Auswertungen. Text und Textwert der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments 6. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar

Levinson, Bernard M. “The Neo-Assyrian Origins of the Canon Formula in Deuteronomy 13:1.” In Scriptural Exegesis: The Shapes of Culture and the Religious Imagination: Essays in Honour of Michael Fishbane, edited by Green, Deborah A. and Lieber, Laura S., 25–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. www.myilibrary.com?id=210410.Google Scholar

Lewis, Agnes Smith. Catalogue of the Syriac MSS. in the Convent of S. Catharine on Mount Sinai. London: Clay & Sons, 1894. http://archive.org/details/catalogueofsyria00lewiuoft.Google Scholar

Lewis, Charlton T., and Short, Charles, eds. A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879.Google Scholar

Lewis, George, trans. The Philocalia of Origen. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1911. http://archive.org/details/philocaliaoforig00orig.Google Scholar

Liddell, George, Scott, Robert, and Jones, Stuart. “Διαθήκη.” In The Online Liddell–Scott–Jones Greek–English Lexicon, edited by Liddell, George, Scott, Robert, Jones, Stuart, and Pantelia, Maria. TLG, 2011. www.tlg.uci.edu/lsj/.Google Scholar

Liddell, George, Scott, Robert, and Jones, Stuart eds. “Ἐποπτικός.” In The Online Liddell–Scott–Jones Greek–English Lexicon, edited by Liddell, George, Scott, Robert, Jones, Stuart, and Pantelia, Maria. TLG, 2011. www.tlg.uci.edu/lsj/.Google Scholar

Lieu, Judith M. Marcion and the Making of a Heretic: God and Scripture in the Second Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Lollar, Jacob. “History of John (Syriac).” In E-Clavis: Christian Apocrypha, 2017. www.nasscal.com/e-clavis-christian-apocrypha/history-of-john-syriac/.Google Scholar

de Lubac, Henri. History and Spirit: The Understanding of Scripture According to Origen. Translated by Anne Englund Nash. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2007.Google Scholar

de Lubac, Henri Medieval Exegesis. Translated by E. M. Macierowski and Mark Sebanc. 3 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Maas, Michael, ed. Exegesis and Empire in the Early Byzantine Mediterranean: Junillus Africanus and the Instituta Regularia Divinae Legis. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar

Macomber, William. Final Inventory of the Microfilmed Manuscripts of the St. Mark’s Convent, Jerusalem. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, 1990. http://archive.org/details/MacomberSMC.Google Scholar

MacPhail, John A., ed. Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text, Translation, Commentary. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar

Mader, Heidrun Elisabeth. Montanistische Orakel und kirchliche Opposition: Der frühe Streit zwischen den phrygischen “neuen Propheten” und dem Autor der vorepiphanischen Quelle als biblische Wirkungsgeschichte des 2. Jh. n.Chr. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012.Google Scholar

Mali, Franz. “Le canon du Nouveau Testament chez les auteurs syriaque.” In Le canon du Nouveau Testament: regards nouveaux sur l’histoire de sa formation, edited by Aragione, Gabriella, Junod, Eric, and Norelli, Enrico, 269–82. Monde de la Bible 54. Geneva: Labor & Fides, 2005.Google Scholar

Mango, Cyril, and Scott, Roger, eds. The Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor: Byzantine and Near Eastern History, AD 284–813. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Manor, T. Scott. Epiphanius’ Alogi and the Johannine Controversy: A Reassessment of Early Ecclesial Opposition to the Johannine Corpus. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 135. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, Jaap. Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled before the Study of an Author or a Text. Philosophia Antiqua 61. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar

Marcovich, Miroslav, ed. Iustini Martyris: Dialogus cum Tryphone. Patristische Texte und Studien 47. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1997.Google Scholar

Marcovich, Miroslav ed. Origenes: Contra Celsum Libri VIII. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 54. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar

Marcus, Ralph, ed. Philo: Supplement I & 2. Questions and Answers on Genesis and Exodus. LCL 380, 401. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Martinez, Francisco Javier. “The Apocalyptic Genre in Syriac.” In IV Symposium Syriacum, 1984: Literary Genres in Syriac Literature: (Groningen, Oosterhesselen 10–12 September), edited by Drijvers, H. J. W., 337–52. Rome: Pont. Institutum Studiorum Orientalium, 1987.Google Scholar

Martinez, Francisco Javier “Eastern Christian Apocalyptic in the Early Muslim Period: Pseudo-Methodius and Pseudo-Athanasius.” Ph.D. thesis, Catholic University of America, 1985. http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/303368158/abstract/D26499E90A4E479EPQ/1.Google Scholar

Matter, E. Ann. “The Apocalypse in Early Medieval Exegesis.” In The Apocalypse in the Middle Ages, edited by Emmerson, Richard K. and McGinn, Bernard, 38–50. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Matter, E. Ann. “The Pseudo-Alcuinian ‘De Septem Sigillis’: An Early Latin Apocalypse Exegesis.” Traditio 36 (1980): 111–37.Google Scholar

McCauley, Leo P., and Stephenson, Anthony A., trans. The Works of Saint Cyril of Jerusalem. FC 61, 64. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1969–70.Google Scholar

McDonald, Lee Martin. The Biblical Canon: Its Origin, Transmission, and Authority. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar

McDonald, Lee Martin The Formation of the Biblical Canon. 2 vols. London: Bloomsbury/T&T Clark, 2017.Google Scholar

McGinn, Bernard. “Revelation.” In The Literary Guide to the Bible, edited by Alter, Robert and Kermode, Frank, 523–44. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1987.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony. St. Cyril of Alexandria: The Christological Controversy: Its History, Theology, and Texts. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 23. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony ed. The Westminster Handbook to Origen. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Meiser, Martin. “Before Canonisation: Early Attestation of Revelation.” In Book of Seven Seals: The Peculiarity of Revelation, its Manuscripts, Attestation, and Transmission, edited by Kraus, Thomas and Sommer, Michael, 137–58. WUNT 363. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar

Meiser, Martin Meknut’iwn Yaytnut’ean S. Awetaranč’in Yovhannu arareal S. Andrēi ew Aritasay episkoposac’n Kesaru. Jerusalem: n.p., 1855.Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M. The Early Versions of the New Testament: Their Origin, Transmission and Limitations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M. “The Future of New Testament Textual Studies.” In The Bible as Book: The Transmission of the Greek Text, edited by McKendrick, Scot and O’Sullivan, Orlaith, 201–08. London: Oak Knoll Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M., and Ehrman, Bart D.. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Margaret M. “‘Problems and Solutions’ in Early Christian Biblical Interpretation: A Telling Case from Origen’s Newly Discovered Greek Homilies on the Psalms (Codex Monacensis Graecus 314).” Adamantius 22 (2016): 40–55.Google Scholar

Moffett, Samuel Hugh. A History of Christianity in Asia: Beginnings to 1500. 2nd ed. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1998.Google Scholar

Molitor, Joseph. “Die georgische Version der Apokalypse (von 978) ins Lateinische übertragen.” Oriens Christianus 50, 51, 52 (1966, 1967, 1968): 1–12, 1–28, 1–21.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Theodor, Krueger, Paul, Schoell, Rudolf, and Kroll, Wilhelm, eds. Corpus iuris civilis. 3 vols. Berlin: Weidmannos, 1892–95. http://archive.org/details/corpusiuriscivil03krueuoft.Google Scholar

Moore, Clifford Herschel. “Note on the Canonicity of the Apocalypse of John.” American Journal of Theology 2, no. 3 (1898): 638–40.Google Scholar

Morin, D. Germanus, ed. Sancti Hieronymi Presbyteri: Tractatus sive homiliae. Anecodota Maredsolana 3.2. Oxford: J. Parker, 1897.Google Scholar

Moule, A. C. Christians in China before the Year 1550. London: SPCK, 1930.Google Scholar

Moyle, John Baron, trans. The Institutes of Justinian. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896. http://archive.org/details/institutesjusti01moylgoog.Google Scholar

Mras, Karl, ed. Eusebius Werke 8.1–2: Die Praeparatio Evangelica. GCS 43.1–2. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1954.Google Scholar

Muirhead, James, ed. The Institutes of Gaius and Rules of Ulpian. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1904.Google Scholar

Müller, Darius, and Gerke, Edmund. “Eine deutsche Übersetzung der Scholia in Apocalypsin mit Einleitung.” In Studien zum Text der Apokalypse II, edited by Sigismund, Marcus and Müller, Darius, 477–520. Arbeiten zur neutestamentlichen Textforschung 50. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110558784.Google Scholar

Müller, Darius, and Malik, Peter. “Rediscovering Paratexts in the Manuscripts of Revelation.” Early Christianity 11, no. 2 (2020). www.academia.edu/43827633/Rediscovering_Paratexts_in_the_Manuscripts_of_Revelation.Google Scholar

Muller, David G. Testing the Apocalypse: The History of the Book of Revelation. Bloomington, IN: WestBow Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Murray, A. T. Demosthenes: Private Orations II. LCL 346. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1939. http://archive.org/details/L346DemosthenesVOrations4149.Google Scholar

Najman, Hindy. “Configuring the Text in Biblical Studies.” In A Teacher for All Generations: Essays in Honor of James C. Vanderkam, edited by Mason, Eric Farrel, Thomas, Samuel I., Schofield, Alison, and Ulrich, Eugene, 3–22. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Najman, Hindy The New Testament in Syriac. London: British and Foreign Bible Society, 1905.Google Scholar

Newman, N. A., ed. “The Apology of al-Kindi.” Translated by Anton Tien. In The Early Christian–Muslim Dialogue: A Collection of Documents from the First Three Islamic Centuries (632–900 A.D.): Translations with Commentary, edited by Newman, N. A., 381–546. Hatfield, PA: Interdisciplinary Biblical Research Institute, 1993.Google Scholar

Niccum, Curt. “Apokalypse Now: The Ethiopic Version of Revelation Fifty Years after Hofmann.” In Studien zum Text der Apokalypse II, edited by Sigismund, Marcus and Müller, Darius, 211–30. Arbeiten Zur Neutestamentlichen Textforschung 50. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110558784-006.Google Scholar

Nicklas, Tobias. “Die apokryphe Thomasapokalypse und ihre Rezeption der Offenbarung des Johannes.” In Die Johannesapokalypse: Kontexte – Konzepte – Rezeption, edited by Frey, Jörg, Kelhoffer, James A., and Tóth, Franz, 683–708. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar

Nicklas, Tobias “Rezeption und Nicht-Rezeption der Offenbarung des Johannes durch antike christliche Apokalypsen.” In Christian Apocrypha: Receptions of the New Testament in Ancient Christian Apocrypha, edited by Roessli, Jean-Michel and Nicklas, Tobias, 325–48. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014.Google Scholar

Niehoff, Maren R. Philo of Alexandria: An Intellectual Biography. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Niermeyer, J. F., van de Kieft, C., and Lake-Schoonebeek, G. S. M. M., eds. “Testamentum.” In Mediae Latinitatis Lexicon Minus: Lexique Latin Medieval – Medieval Latin Dictionary – Mittellateinisches Worterbuch. Leiden: Brill, 1976.Google Scholar

Norehad, Bedros. Koriun: Life of Mashtots. n.p.: Armenian Benevolent Union, Golden Jubilee Publication, 1964.Google Scholar

Norton, Jonathan D. H. Contours in the Text: Textual Variation in the Writings of Paul, Josephus and the Yahad. Library of New Testament Studies 430. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar

Nünlist, René. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575891.Google Scholar

Oller, Thomas Hilary. “The Nikol’skij Apocalypse Codex and its Place in the Textual History of Medieval Slavic Apocalypse Manuscripts.” Ph.D. thesis, Brown University, 1993. http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/304048523/abstract/E5B9BBDF886949E6PQ/1.Google Scholar

Orlandi, Tito, trans. “Cirillo Vescovo di Alessandria.” In Omelie copte: Aegyptiorum Patrum homilias, edited by Orlandi, Tito, 121–44. Corona Patrum 7. Turin: Società editrice internazionale, 1981.Google Scholar

Paton, W. R., trans. Polybius: The Histories III. LCL 138. London: Heinemann, 1923. http://archive.org/details/historieswitheng03poly.Google Scholar

Pearse, Roger. “Philip of Side, Fragments (2010).” The Tertullian Project, 2010. www.tertullian.org/fathers/philip_of_side_fragments.htm.Google Scholar

Peterson, Jacob W. “Math Myths: How Many Manuscripts we Have and Why More isn’t Always Better.” In Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism, edited by Hixson, Elijah and Gurry, Peter J., 48–69. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2019.Google Scholar

Phillips, David. “Les canons des nouveaux testaments en syriaque.” In Le Nouveau Testament en syriaque, edited by Haelewyck, Jean-Claude, 7–26. Études Syriaques 14. Paris: Geuthner, 2017.Google Scholar

Phillips, George, ed. The Doctrine of Addai, the Apostle. London: Trübner & Co., 1876. http://archive.org/details/doctrineofaddaia00phil.Google Scholar

Prigent, Pierre. “Hippolyte, commentateur de l’Apocalypse.” Theologische Zeitschrift 28 (1972): 391–412.Google Scholar

Prigent, Pierre, and Stehly, Ralph. “Citations d’Hippolyte trouvées dans le ms. Bodl. Syr. 140. 1.” Theologische Zeitschrift 30 (1974): 82–85.Google Scholar

Prigent, Pierre, and Stehly, Ralph “Les fragments du De Apocalypse d’Hippolyte.” Theologische Zeitschrift 29 (1979): 313–33.Google Scholar

Pusey, E. B., trans. S. Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria: Five Tomes against Nestorius, Scholia on the Incarnation, Christ is One, Fragments against Diodore of Tarsus, Theodore Mopsuestia, the Synousiasts. Oxford: J. Parker, 1881.Google Scholar

Pusey, E. B., and Randell, Thomas, trans. S. Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria: Commentary on the Gospel According to S. John. 2 vols. Oxford and London: J. Parker/Walter Smith, 1874.Google Scholar

Quasten, Johannes. Patrology. 4 vols. Notre Dame, IN: Christian Classics, 1950.Google Scholar

Rackham, H. Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. LCL 73. London: Heinemann, 1926. http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.183333.Google Scholar

Rahlfs, Alfred, ed. Septuaginta: Id Est, Vetus Testamentum Graece Iuxta LXX Interpretes. Editio minor. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1979.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. Armitage, ed. The Philocalia of Origen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1893. https://archive.org/details/philocaliaorige00robigoog/page/n7.Google Scholar

Roby, Henry John. An Introduction to the Study of Justinian’s Digest: Containing an Account of its Composition and of the Jurists Used or Referred to Therein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1886.Google Scholar

Rogers, Benjamin Bickley. Aristophanes: The Peace, the Birds, the Frogs. LCL 179. London: Heinemann, 1927. http://archive.org/details/aristophaneswith03arisuoft.Google Scholar

van Rompay, Lucas. “Juridical Literature.” In Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage: Electronic Edition, edited by Brock, Sebastian P., Butts, Aaron Michael, Kiraz, George Anton, and van Rompay, Lucas, 238–39. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2008; online ed. Beth Mardutho, 2011. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Juridical-literature.Google Scholar

van Rompay, Lucas “Pawlos the Persian.” In Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage: Electronic Edition, edited by Brock, Sebastian P., Butts, Aaron Michael, Kiraz, George Anton, and van Rompay, Lucas, 324–25. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2008; online ed. Beth Mardutho, 2011. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Pawlos-the-Persian.Google Scholar

Rorem, Paul, and Lamoreaux, John C.. John of Scythopolis and the Dionysian Corpus: Annotating the Areopagite. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rost, Leonhard. “Zur Geschichte des Kanons bei den Nestorianern.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 27, no. 1 (1928): 103–06.Google Scholar

Rothschild, Clare K. “The Muratorian Fragment as Roman Fake.” Novum Testamentum 60, no. 1 (December 27, 2018): 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341590.Google Scholar

Rothstein, Gustav. “Der Kanon der biblischen Bücher bei den babylonischen Nestorianern im 9./10. jhdt.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 58, no. 3 (1904): 634–63.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Adelin, Doutreleau, Louis, and Mercier, Charles, eds. Irénée de Lyon: Contre les hérésies. SC 100, 152–53, 210–11, 263–64, 293–94. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1969–82.Google Scholar

Ruiz, Jean-Pierre. Ezekiel in the Apocalypse: The Transformation of Prophetic Language in Revelation 16,17–19,10. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Peter Lang GmbH/Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1989.Google Scholar

Runia, David T. “Philo of Alexandria and the Greek Hairesis-Model.” Vigiliae Christianae 53, no. 2 (1999): 117–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1584544.Google Scholar

Russell, Donald A., and Konstan, David, eds. Heraclitus: Homeric Problems. Writings from the Greco-Roman World 14. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2005.Google Scholar

Sachau, Eduard, ed. Syrische rechtsbücher. 2 vols. Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1907–08.Google Scholar

Sachau, Eduard Verzeichniss der syrischen Handschriften der Königlichen Bibliothek zu Berlin. Berlin: A. Asher, 1899. https://archive.org/stream/SachauBerlinCatalog/sachau%20berlin%20catalog#page/n323/mode/1up.Google Scholar

Saeki, P. Yoshio. The Nestorian Monument in China. London: SPCK, 1916.Google Scholar

Sandnes, Karl Olav. The Challenge of Homer: School, Pagan Poets and Early Christianity. Library of New Testament Studies 400. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

Schaff, Philip. The Creeds of Christendom, with a History and Critical Notes: The Greek and Latin Creeds, with Translations. 5th ed. 3 vols. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1919. http://archive.org/details/TheCreedsOfChristendomV2.Google Scholar

Scheck, Thomas P., trans. Origen: Homilies on Numbers. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Schenkl, Caroli, ed. Sancti Ambrosii Opera: pars 1. Exameron. De paradiso. De Cain et Abel. De Noe. De Abraham. De Isaac. De bono mortis. CSEL 32.1. Vienna: F. Tempsky, 1897.Google Scholar

Schiano, Claudio. “Stefano gobar e la controversia sul corpo risorto nella bibliotheca di fozio.” Rivista di Storia del Cristianesimo 13, no. 1 (2016): 89–106.Google Scholar

Schironi, Francesca. “Greek Commentaries.” Dead Sea Discoveries 19 (2012): 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-12341238.Google Scholar

Schmid, Josef. Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Apokalypse-Textes. Munich: Karl Zink, 1955.Google Scholar

Schmid, Josef Studies in the History of the Greek Text of the Apocalypse: The Ancient Stems. Edited by Hernández, Juan, Müller, Darius, and Allen, Garrick V.. Atlanta: SBL Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Schmid, Ulrich B., and Karrer, Martin. “Die neue Edition der Johannesapokalypse: ein Arbeitsbericht.” In Studien zum Text der Apokalypse, edited by Sigismund, Marcus, Karrer, Martin, and Schmid, Ulrich B., 3–15. Arbeiten zur Neutestamenilichen Textforschung 47. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Thomas, trans. Hippolytus of Rome: Commentary on Daniel and “Chronicon.” Gorgias Dissertations 67. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Thomas “Ibn Kātib Qayṣar on Revelation 1–3: The First Vision and the Letters to the Seven Churches.” In Davis, Stephen J., Schmidt, T. C., and Talia, Shawqi, Revelation 1–3 in Christian Arabic Commentary: John’s First Vision and the Letters to the Seven Churches, 41–59. Christian Arabic Texts in Translation 1. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Schneemelcher, Wilhelm. New Testament Apocrypha. Translated by Robert McLachlan Wilson. 2 vols. London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Scholem, Gershom. “Revelation and Tradition as Religious Categories in Judaism.” In The Messianic Idea in Judaism and Other Essays on Jewish Spirituality, edited by Scholem, Gershom, 282–303. New York: Schocken Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Eduard, and Mommsen, Theodor, eds. Eusebius Werke 2.1–3: Die Kirchengeschichte. GCS 9. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1903.Google Scholar

Sedláček, Jaroslav, ed. Dionysius bar Ṣalibi: In Apocalypsim, Actus et Epistulas Catholicas. CSCO/Scriptores Syri 53/18 (Syriac), 60/20 (Latin). Paris: Typographeo Reipublicae, 1909.Google Scholar

Sefaria. “The William Davidson Digital Edition of the Koren Noé Talmud, with Commentary by Rabbi Adin Even-Israel Steinsaltz.” Electronic Database. Talmud Bavli: William Davidson Talmud, n.d.Google Scholar

Selb, Walter, and Kaufhold, Hubert, eds. Das syrisch-römische Rechtsbuch. 3 vols. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2002.Google Scholar

Sevcenko, Nancy Patterson. “Christ: Types of Christ.” In Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, edited by Kazhdan, Alexander P., 437–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Stephen. “The Afterlife of the Apocalypse of John in Byzantine Apocalyptic Literature and Commentary.” In The New Testament in Byzantium, edited by Krueger, Derek and Nelson, Robert, 301–16. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 2016.Google Scholar

Sigismund, Marcus, ed. Studien zum Text der Apokalypse. Arbeiten zur Neutestamenilichen Textforschung 47. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=2189968.Google Scholar

Sigismund, Marcus, and Müller, Darius, eds. Studien zum Text der Apokalypse II. Arbeiten zur Neutestamentlichen Textforschung 50. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar

Sigismund, Marcus, and Müller, Darius eds. Studien zum Text der Apokalypse III. Arbeiten zur Neutestamentlichen Textforschung 51. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar

Sluiter, Ineke. “Obscurity.” In Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices: A Global Comparative Approach, edited by Grafton, Anthony and Most, Glenn W., 34–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Slusser, Michael, trans. St. Gregory Thaumaturgus: Life and Works. FC 98. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan Z. “Sacred Persistence: Towards a Redescription of Canon.” In Approaches to Ancient Judaism: Theory and Practice, edited by Green, William Scott, 11–28. Brown Judaic Studies 1. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press for Brown University, 1978.Google Scholar

Smith, R. Payne, trans. S. Cyril Patriarch of Alexandria: Commentary upon the Gospel According to S. Luke. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1859.Google Scholar

Smith, Yancy Warren. The Mystery of Anointing: Hippolytus’ Commentary on the Song of Songs in Social and Critical Contexts: Texts, Translations, and Comprehensive Study. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2013.Google Scholar

von Soden, Hermann Freiherr. Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments: Untersuchungen. Vols. 1.1, 1.3, 2.1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1911.Google Scholar

Somolinos, Juan Rodriguez, ed. “Διαθήκη.” In Diccionario Griego-Español En Línea, n.d. http://dge.cchs.csic.es.Google Scholar

Stählin, Otto, ed. Clemens Alexandrinus Band 2 Stromata Buch I–VI. GCS 15. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1906.Google Scholar

Stählin, Otto, and Ludwig, Früchtel. Clemens Alexandrinus Band 3 Stromata. Buch VII und VIII, Excerpta ex Theodoto – Eclogae propheticae quis dives salvetur – Fragmente. GCS 17. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar

Stolte, Bernard H. “The Law of New Rome: Byzantine Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, edited by Johnston, David, 355–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. “Armenian Canon Lists I: The Council of Partaw (768 C. E.).” Harvard Theological Review 66, no. 4 (1973): 479–86.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. “Armenian Canon Lists II: The Stichometry of Anania of Shirak (c. 615–c. 690 C.E.).” Harvard Theological Review 68, no. 3/4 (1975): 253–60.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. “Armenian Canon Lists III: The Lists of Mechitar of Ayrivankc (c. 1285 C.E.).” Harvard Theological Review 69, no. 3/4 (1976): 289–300.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. “Armenian Canon Lists IV: The List of Gregory of Tatcew (14th Century).” Harvard Theological Review 72, no. 3/4 (1979): 237–44.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. “Armenian Canon Lists V: Anonymous Texts*.” Harvard Theological Review 83, no. 2 (1990): 141–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000005605.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. “Armenian Canon Lists VI: Hebrew Names and Other Attestations.” Harvard Theological Review 94, no. 4 (2001): 477–91.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. “L’étude du canon arménien.” In Le canon du Nouveau Testament: regards nouveaux sur l’histoire de sa formation, edited by Aragione, Gabriella, Junod, Eric, and Norelli, Enrico, 283–96. Monde de la Bible 54. Geneva: Labor & Fides, 2005.Google Scholar

Stonehouse, Ned Bernard. The Apocalypse in the Ancient Church: A Study in the History of the New Testament Canon. Goes: Oosterbaan & Le Cointre, 1929.Google Scholar

Strand, Kenneth Albert. “A Further Note on the Covenantal Form in the Book of Revelation.” Andrews University Seminary Studies 21, no. 3 (1983): 251–64.Google Scholar

Struck, Peter T. Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of their Texts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Suciu, Alin. “‘Me, This Wretched Sinner’: A Coptic Fragment from the Vision of Theophilus concerning the Flight of the Holy Family to Egypt.” Vigiliae Christianae 67, no. 4 (January 1, 2013): 436–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700720-12341130.Google Scholar

Suggit, John N., trans. Oecumenius: Commentary on the Apocalypse. FC 112. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Sundberg, Albert C. “The Bible Canon and the Christian Doctrine of Inspiration.” Interpretation 29, no. 4 (1975): 352–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/002096437502900402.Google Scholar

Sundberg, Albert C. “Canon Muratori: A Fourth-Century List.” Harvard Theological Review 66, no. 1 (1973): 1–41.Google Scholar

Sutton, E. W., and Rackham, H., trans. Cicero: De Oratore Books I–II. LCL 348. London: Heinemann, 1967.Google Scholar

Sutton, Ray R. That You May Prosper: Dominion by Covenant. Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1987.Google Scholar

Tabbernee, William. “The Appearance of the New Jerusalem in Montanist Interpretation and the Revelation of John.” In Die Johannesapokalypse: Kontexte – Konzepte – Rezeption, edited by Frey, Jörg, Kelhoffer, James A., and Tóth, Franz, 651–82. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar

Talia, Shawqi, trans. “Būlus al-Būshī, Commentary on the Apocalypse of John, Ch. 1–3.” In Davis, Stephen J., Schmidt, T. C., and Talia, Shawqi, Revelation 1–3 in Christian Arabic Commentary: John’s First Vision and the Letters to the Seven Churches, 60–85. Christian Arabic Texts in Translation 1. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Talia, Shawqi “Būlus al-Būshi’s Arabic Commentary on the Apocalypse of St. John: An English Translation and a Commentary.” Ph.D. thesis, Catholic University of America, 1987.Google Scholar

Talia, Shawqi, and Davis, Stephen J.. “Būlus al-Būshī on Revelation 1–3: Christology and Christian–Muslim Encounter.” In Davis, Stephen J., Schmidt, T. C., and Talia, Shawqi, Revelation 1–3 in Christian Arabic Commentary: John’s First Vision and the Letters to the Seven Churches, 9–21. Christian Arabic Texts in Translation 1. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Tang, Li. A Study of the History of Nestorian Christianity in China and its Literature in Chinese: Together with a New English Translation of the Dunhuang Nestorian Documents. Asian and African Studies 27. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2002.Google Scholar

Tarán, Leonardo, and Gutas, Dimitri, eds. Aristotle Poetics: Editio Maior of the Greek Text with Historical Introductions and Philological Commentaries. Mnemosyne Supplements: Monographs on Greek and Latin Language and Literature 338. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Taubenschlag, Rafal. The Law of Greco-Roman Egypt in the Light of the Papyri 332 BC–640 AD. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1955.Google Scholar

Taylor, David G. K. “Répertoire des manuscrits syriaques du Nouveau Testament.” In Le Nouveau Testament en syriaque, edited by Haelewyck, Jean-Claude, 291–313. Études Syriaques 14. Paris: Geuthner, 2017.Google Scholar

Teske, Roland J., trans. Augustine: Arianism and Other Heresies. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/18. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Teske, Roland J. trans. Augustine: Letters 100–155. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century II/2. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2003.Google Scholar

van Thiel, Helmut, ed. Scholia D in Iliadem: Proecdosis aucta et correctior 2014. Secundum codices manu scriptos. Elektronische Schriftenreihe der Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek 7. Cologne: Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek, 2014. www.uni-koeln.de/.Google Scholar

Thielman, Frank. “The Place of the Apocalypse in the Canon of St. Gregory Nazianzen.” Tyndale Bulletin 49, no. 1 (1998): 155–57.Google Scholar

Thierry, Nicole. “L’Apocalypse de Jean et l’iconographie byzantine.” In L’Apocalypse de Jean : traditions exégétiques et iconographiques, IIIe–XIIIe siècles: actes du Colloque de la Fondation Hardt, 29 février–3 mars 1976, edited by Yves, Christe, 319–39. Geneva: Droz, 1979.Google Scholar

Thomson, Robert W., trans. Nersēs of Lambron: Commentary on the Dormition of Saint John: Armenian Text and Annotated Translation. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar

Thomson, Robert W. trans. Nerses of Lambron: Commentary on the Revelation of Saint John. Hebrew University Armenian Studies 9. Louvain: Peeters, 2007.Google Scholar

Thomson, Robert W. “The Reception of the Biblical Book of Revelation in Armenia.” In The Armenian Apocalyptic Tradition: A Comparative Perspective: Essays Presented in Honor of Professor Robert W. Thomson on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday, edited by Bardakjian, Kevork B. and La Porta, Sergio, 242–53. Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha 25. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan. Symbolism and Interpretation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Trevett, Christine. Montanism: Gender, Authority, and the New Prophecy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Tzamalikos, Panayiotis, ed. An Ancient Commentary on the Book of Revelation: A Critical Edition of the Scholia in Apocalypsin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Ulrich, Eugene. “The Notion and Definition of Canon.” In The Canon Debate, edited by Sanders, James A. and McDonald, Lee Martin, 21–35. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar

van Unnik, W. C. “De la règle μήτε ποσθεῖναι μήτε άφελεῖν dans l’histoire du canon.” Vigiliae Christianae 3 (1949): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007249X00014.Google Scholar

Vermes, G. “Bible and Midrash: Early Old Testament Exegesis.” In The Cambridge History of the Bible, edited by Ackroyd, P. and Evans, C., 199–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. www.cambridge.org/core/books/the-cambridge-history-of-the-bible/bible-and-midrash-early-old-testament-exegesis/0EDB3D918A4E8578BC57CEB56C3D0D17.Google Scholar

Vleeming, Sven Peter. “A Demotic Doppelurkunde.” In The Two Faces of Graeco-Roman Egypt: Greece and Demotic and Greek-Demotic Texts and Studies, edited by Verhoogt, Arthur M. F. W. and Vleeming, Sven Peter, 155–70. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar

Vööbus, Arthur, ed. The Apocalypse in the Harklean Version: A Facsimile Edition of MS. Mardin Orth. 35, Fol. 143 r–159 v. CSCO/Scriptores Syri 400/56. Louvain: CorpusSCO, 1978.Google Scholar

Watson, Alan, ed. The Digest of Justinian. 4 vols. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Watson, John Selby, trans. Cicero on Oratory and Orators. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1860. http://archive.org/details/ciceroonoratoryo00cice.Google Scholar

Wehr, Hans, and Cowan, J. Milton, eds. A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic. 3rd ed. Ithaca, NY: Spoken Language Services, 1976. http://archive.org/details/Dict_Wehr.pdf.Google Scholar

Weinrich, William C., trans. Greek Commentaries on Revelation. Ancient Christian Texts. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2011.Google Scholar

Weinrich, William C. trans. Latin Commentaries on Revelation. Ancient Christian Texts. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2011.Google Scholar

Westcott, Brooke Foss. A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament. 4th ed. London: Macmillan, 1875. http://archive.org/details/ageneralsurveyof00westuoft.Google Scholar

Whealey, Alice. “The Apocryphal Apocalypse of John: A Byzantine Apocalypse from the Early Islamic Period.” Journal of Theological Studies 53, no. 2 (2002): 533–40.Google Scholar

Whitaker, Molly, ed. Tatian: Oratio ad Graecos and Fragments. Oxford Early Christian Texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar

White, Joseph, ed. Actuum apostolorum et epistolarum tam Catholicarum quam Paulinarum: Versio Syriaca Philoxeniana, ex codice MS. Ridleiano in Bibl. Coll. Nov. Oxon. reposito nunc primum edita. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1799. http://syri.ac/bibliography/1363651960.Google Scholar

Whitehead, David, ed. Suda On Line: Byzantine Lexicography, 2019. www.stoa.org.Google Scholar

Wiid, J. S. “The Testamental Significance of Διαθήκη in Hebrews 9:15–22.” Neotestamentica 26, no. 1 (1992): 149–56.Google Scholar

Willard, Louis Charles. A Critical Study of the Euthalian Apparatus. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar

Williams, Frank, trans. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis. 2nd rev. ed. 2 vols. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 63, 79. Leiden: Brill, 2009. http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=489489.Google Scholar

Williams, Peter J. “The Syriac Versions of the New Testament.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by Ehrman, Bart D. and Holmes, Michael W., 2nd ed., 143–66. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Witte, Bernd, ed. Die Sünden der Priester und Mönche: koptische Eschatologie des 8. Jahrhunderts nach Kodex M 602 pp. 104–154 (ps. Athanasius) der Pierpont Morgan Library. Kommentar. Teil 1: Textausgabe. Arbeiten zum spätantiken und koptischen Ägypten 12. Altenberge: Oros, 2002.Google Scholar

Wolska-Conus, Wanda. Cosmas Indicopleustès. Topographie Chrétienne. SC 141, 159, 197. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1968.Google Scholar

Woods, F. H. “An Examination of the New Testament Quotations of Ephrem Syrus.” In Studia Biblica et Ecclesiastica: Essays Chiefly in Biblical and Patristic Criticism, vol. 3, 105–38.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1891. https://archive.org/details/studiabiblicaete03oxfo/page/105.Google Scholar

Worthington, Ian, ed. Brill’s New Jacoby. Brill, n.d. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/brill-s-new-jacoby.Google Scholar

Young, Frances M. Biblical Exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10450680.Google Scholar

Youseff, Youhanna Nessim. “The Commentary on the Apocalypse Councils and Eschatology.” Bulletin de la Société d’Archéologie Copte 49 (2010): 109–42.Google Scholar

Zaman, Luc. Bible and Canon: A Modern Historical Inquiry. Louvain: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Cape Town: Juta, 1990.Google Scholar

Zōhrapean, Hovhannu. The Zohrab Bible [Astowacašownčՙ matean hin ew nor ktakaranacՙ]. 4 vols. Venice: Convent of St. Lazaro, 1805. http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/texte/etcs/arm/zohrab/armnt/armnt.htm.Google Scholar