Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Tramp Shipping and Ownership
- The Trades
- The Seamen
- “Printed Guides for Master Mariners as a Source of Productivity Change in Shipping, 1750-1914”
- Tramp-Shipping Regions
- A. Wales
- B. The Northwest
- C. The West Country
- D. The Northeast
- E. The Southeast
- F. The British Empire: Maritime Canada
- Bibliography
“Printed Guides for Master Mariners as a Source of Productivity Change in Shipping, 1750-1914”
from The Seamen
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Tramp Shipping and Ownership
- The Trades
- The Seamen
- “Printed Guides for Master Mariners as a Source of Productivity Change in Shipping, 1750-1914”
- Tramp-Shipping Regions
- A. Wales
- B. The Northwest
- C. The West Country
- D. The Northeast
- E. The Southeast
- F. The British Empire: Maritime Canada
- Bibliography
Summary
I do therefore recommend to you to lessen your imports to add three thousand pounds to our stock and to keep two ships of our own in the trade of about 400 hogsheads each. They would be loaded early and you might always build or charter a ship to bring home the later tobacco. That would be a snug, clever business and which I could manage very well. Though, after all that I have said, a great deal depends on the dispatch and captains, for, if he is idle and not saving, the ships will soon eat us out.
No man has greater responsibilities thrown upon him, heavier duties to perform, or risks to pass through, than a master mariner; and yet no person, generally, has less credit for his work.
Improvements in the productivity of ocean shipping between 1600 and 1850 have been identified and discussed by D.C. North, and his analysis has been largely confirmed with respect to the colonial North American trades by J.F. Walton and G.M. Shepherd. The last two writers agree with North that there was little technological innovation in the vessels themselves except for some reduction in manning levels. This reduction in manning, they argue, was to be attributed less to economies of scale than to a diminution in the carrying of armaments consequent upon the suppression of privateering and piracy. Much of the improvement in productivity, they found, was the result of quicker turn-round time, the standardisation of packages, and other reductions in inventory costs. It is perhaps worth adding that as vessels were deployed more efficiently the ratio of sea time to port time would be increased, and this itself would improve the speed at which members of the merchant community could communicate with each other, to the further benefit of productivity.
Neither of the authorities cited above discusses the part the master mariner played in the improvement in the productivity of shipping, an improvement which was to gather pace in the nineteenth century when technological change became extremely rapid after an age of relative stagnation. This article examines one factor that played a part in improving the efficiency of master mariners, namely the proliferation and wider circulation of printed guides to assist them in the manifold duties that were devolved upon them by ship owners and charterers.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- British Tramp Shipping, 1750–1914 , pp. 121 - 136Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2003