Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Contents
- List of Authors
- Introduction
- PART I TAXATION, STATE AND SOCIETY: RECIPROCITY AND THE LIMITS OF THE POWER TO TAX
- Voluntary Compliance Beyond the Letter of the Law: Reciprocity and Fair Play
- What is Wrong with Endowment Taxation: Self-Usership as a Prerequisite for Legitimate Taxation
- Is Taxation on a Par with Forced Labour?
- Conflict of Trust: EU Member States’ Fiscal Sovereignty and the Ideal of the Internal Market
- PART II Trust and morality: tax governance in need of transparency
- PART III International taxation: in search of democratic legitimacy
- PART IV Behavioural aspects of taxation and trust
Conflict of Trust: EU Member States’ Fiscal Sovereignty and the Ideal of the Internal Market
from PART I - TAXATION, STATE AND SOCIETY: RECIPROCITY AND THE LIMITS OF THE POWER TO TAX
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 September 2018
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Contents
- List of Authors
- Introduction
- PART I TAXATION, STATE AND SOCIETY: RECIPROCITY AND THE LIMITS OF THE POWER TO TAX
- Voluntary Compliance Beyond the Letter of the Law: Reciprocity and Fair Play
- What is Wrong with Endowment Taxation: Self-Usership as a Prerequisite for Legitimate Taxation
- Is Taxation on a Par with Forced Labour?
- Conflict of Trust: EU Member States’ Fiscal Sovereignty and the Ideal of the Internal Market
- PART II Trust and morality: tax governance in need of transparency
- PART III International taxation: in search of democratic legitimacy
- PART IV Behavioural aspects of taxation and trust
Summary
ABSTRACT
A key objective of the European Union (EU) is the establishment and functioning of the Internal Market. Although, formally, EU Member States are sovereign when designing their direct tax laws, practically, the ideal of the Internal Market works as a backdoor that enables the EU to force EU Member States to change their direct tax laws. Instruments available to the EU are tax directives and the state aid framework. EU Member States also have to take the protection of the Treaty Freedoms into account, which as the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) shows, limits EU Member States ‘ options to set national anti-abuse rules.
The need to combat tax avoidance by multinational enterprises has led to the OECD BEPS project to several proposals by the European Commission and to a new Anti-Tax-Avoidance directive, to be adopted before the end of 2016. In this chapter it is argued that the ideal of the Internal Market restricts EU Member States ‘ fiscal sovereignty. The underlying conflict of trust, a conflict of putting trust in the state versus putting trust in the market, has a serious impact on both the willingness and the ability of EU Member States to deal with corporate tax abuse and tax competition between states.
Political philosophers shed light on this conflict of trust between market and state. Hobbes stresses the importance of unlimited sovereignty. Polanyi shows the domination of the market by pointing to the double movement of dis-embedding and embedding forces and the effect on society of liberal states that have chosen ‘ laissez-faire ‘. Fraser points to markets dominating the state and civil society and calls for a triple movement, making Polanyi ‘ s framework sensitive to domination and emancipation, working towards a critical theory to understand today ‘ s capitalist crises. Their work points to an imbalance in power between state and the market, caused by the liberal and neo-liberal paradigm, stressing the importance of the market and the retreat of the state.
INTRODUCTION
For some time now, multinational enterprises (MNEs) have been subject of a public debate about taxes. This public debate has been predominantly a moral debate. In 2013 the UK‘s Prime Minister David Cameron publicly stated that ‘ Tax avoiding firms like Starbucks and Amazon lack “ moral scruples “.’
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Building Trust in Taxation , pp. 89 - 116Publisher: IntersentiaPrint publication year: 2017
- 1
- Cited by