Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:07:19.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Identity Markers in South-Western Fazzan

Were the People of the Wadi Tanzzuft/Tadrart Akakus Region Garamantes?

from Part I - Burial Practices in the Central Sahara

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2019

M. C. Gatto
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
D. J. Mattingly
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
N. Ray
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
M. Sterry
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

According to Herodotus’s Histories, the people living a ten day’s journey to the west of the Garamantes was the AtarantesAs suggested by Liverani,if the Garamantes are to be placed in the Wadi al-Ajal around Jarma/Garama, this would likely locate the Atarantes in the Wadi Tanzzuft/Tadrart Akakus region Fig. 3.1). Archaeological research over the last two decades has considerably improved our knowledge of Saharan civilisations that developed from the early first millennium BC to the late first millennium AD. It is now possible to get a deeper insight on how the people living in the Wadi Tanzzuft/Tadrart Akakus region expressed their identity through material culture and behaviour and their relation to trajectories in Garamantian culture.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alhaique, F. and di Lernia, S. 2005. Rituali funerari dei Garamanti nello Wadi Tanzzuft (Sahara libico). Atti del 4°Convegno nazionale di Archeozoologia, Pordenone 13–15 Novembre 2003. Quaderni del Museo archeologico del Friuli occidentale 6: 237–41.Google Scholar
Bellair, P., Gobert, E. G., Jodot, P. and Pauphillet, D. 1953. Mission au Fezzân. Tunis: Imprimerie Officielle de la Tunisie.Google Scholar
Biagetti, S. and di Lernia, S. 2008. Combining intensive field survey and digital technologies. New data on the Garamantian castles of Wadi Awiss (Acacus Mountain, Libyan Sahara). Journal of African Archaeology 6: 5785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, S. and Guglielmi, V. 2006. Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of residues from volcanic stone objects. In Liverani 2006: 293–94.Google Scholar
Castelli, R. and Liverani, M. 2006. Cemeteries around the Barkat Oasis. In Liverani 2006: 2528.Google Scholar
di Lernia, S. and Manzi, G. (eds). 2002. Sand, Stones, and Bones. The Archaeology of Death in the Wadi Tanzzuft Valley. AZA 3. Firenze: All’Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar
di Lernia, S., Merighi, F., Ricci, F. and Sivilli, S. 2002. From regions to sites: the excavations. In di Lernia and Manzi 2002: 69156.Google Scholar
Dowler, A. and Galvin, E. R. (eds). 2011. Money, Trade and Trade Routes in Pre-Islamic North Africa. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Fentress, E. 2011. Slavers on chariots. In Dowler and Galvin 2011: 6471.Google Scholar
Fontana, S. 1995. I manufatti romani dei corredi funerari del Fezzan. Testimonianza dei commerci e della cultura dei Garamanti (I-III sec. d.C.). In Productions et exportations Africaines. Actualités archéologiques en Afrique du nord Antique et Médiévale, Paris: Edition du CTHS, 405–20.Google Scholar
Francis, E. D. 1992. The impact of non-Indo-European languages on Greek and Mycenaean. In Polomé, E. C. and Winter, W. (eds), Reconstructing Languages and Cultures, Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 58, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 469506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcea, E. A. A. 2001. Uan Tabu in the Settlement History of the Libyan Sahara. AZA 2. Firenze: All’Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar
Gatto, M. C. 2014. Cultural entanglement at the dawn of the Eygptian history: a view from the First Cataract region. Origini 36: 93123.Google Scholar
Hauser, G. and De Stefano, G. F. 1989. Epigenetic Variants of the Human Skull. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2011. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17.1: 154–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Malden, Oxford, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 2016. Studies in Human-Things Entanglement. Stanford: Open Access. Available on: https://www.academia.edu/23001428/STUDIES_IN_HUMAN-THING_ENTANGLEMENT_Ian_Hodder.Google Scholar
Honeychurch, B. 2014. Alternative complexities: the archaeology of pastoral nomadic states. Journal of Archaeological Research 22.4: 277326.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leschi, L. 1945. La Mission Scientifique au Fezzân. Archéologie. Travaux de l’Institut de Recherches Sahariennes 3: 183–86.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, K. G. and Martinez, A. 1995. Frontiers and boundaries in archaeological perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 471–92.Google Scholar
Liverani, M. 2000. The Libyan caravan road in Herodotus IV.181–185. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 43: 496520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liverani, M. (ed.). 2006. Aghram Nadharif. The Barkat oasis. (Sha’abiya of Ghat, Libyan Sahara) in Garamantian Times. Arid Zone Archaeology Monographs 5. Firenze: All’Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar
Liverani, M., Barbato, L., Castelli, R., Cancellieri, E. and Putzolu, C. 2013. The survey of Fewet necropolis. In Mori 2013a: 199224.Google Scholar
Lucy, S. 2005. Ethnic and cultural identities. In Diaz-Andreu, M. S., Lucy, S., Babic, S. and Edwards, D. N. (eds), The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion, London, New York: Routledge, 86109.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. C. 2013. Complex societies, urbanism, and trade in the Western Sahel. In Mitchell, P. and Lane, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 829–44.Google Scholar
Maspero, A., Bruni, S., Cattaneo, C. and Lovisolo, A. 2002. Textiles and leather: raw materials and manufacture. In di Lernia and Manzi 2002: 157–67.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. (ed.). 2003. The Archaeology of Fazzān. Volume 1: Synthesis. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquity.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. (ed.). 2007. The Archaeology of Fazzān. Volume 2, Gazetteer, Pottery and other finds. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquity.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. (ed.). 2010. The Archaeology of Fazzān. Volume 3, Excavations of C. M. Daniels. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquity.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. 2011. The Garamantes of Fazzān: an early Libyan state with Trans-Saharan connections. In Dowler and Galvin 2011: 4960.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. (ed.). 2013. The Archaeology of Fazzān. Volume 4 Survey and Excavations at Old Jarma (ancient Garama) Carried Out by C. M. Daniels (1962–69) and the Fazzan Project. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquity.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. and MacDonald, K. 2013. Early African cities. In Clark, P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the City in History, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6682.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. and Sterry, M. 2013. The first towns in the central Sahara. Antiquity 87.336: 303–18.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. and Wilson, A. 2010. Concluding thoughts: Made in Fazzan? In Mattingly 2010: 523–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlo, S., Hakenbeck, S. and Balbo, A. L. 2013. Desert Migrations Project XVIII: The archaeology of the northern Fazzan: a preliminary report. Libyan Studies 44: 141–62.Google Scholar
Mori, L. 2006a. The ground stone tools. In Liverani 2006: 259–84.Google Scholar
Mori, L. 2006b. The loom weights. In Liverani 2006: 319–22.Google Scholar
Mori, L. 2006c. The vesicular basalt lamps. In Liverani 2006: 285–92.Google Scholar
Mori, L. (ed.). 2013a. Life and Death of a Rural Village in Garamantian Times. Archaeological Investigation in the Oasis of Fewet (Libyan Sahara). AZA 6. Firenze: All’Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar
Mori, L. 2013b. Fortified citadels and castles in Garamantian times: the evidence from southern Fazzan (Libyan Sahara). In F. Jesse and C. Vogel (eds), The Power of Walls. Fortifications in Ancient North-Eastern Africa, Proceedings of the International Workshop Held at the University of Cologne 4th−7th August 2011, Colloquium Africanum 5, Köln: Heinrich Barth Insitutte, 195215.Google Scholar
Mori, L. 2013c. The survey in the Tan Ataram area. In Mori 2013a: 7178.Google Scholar
Mori, L. and Ricci, F. with contributions by Cancellieri, E., Gatto, M. C. and Lemorini, C. 2013. The excavation of the Fewet necropolis. In Mori 2013a: 253318.Google Scholar
Mori, L., Gatto, M. C., Ricci, F. and Zerboni, A. 2013. Life and death at Fewet. In Mori 2013a: 375–87.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2008. Introduction: for tradition as an analytical category. World Archaeology 40.3: 281–94.Google Scholar
Pace, B., Sergi, S. and Caputo, G. 1951. Scavi sahariani. Ricerche nell’Uadi el-Agial e nell’Oasi di Gat. Monumenti Antichi 41: 150549.Google Scholar
Parton, H. 2007. Stone artefacts. In Mattingly 2007: 493–99.Google Scholar
Ricci, F., Tafuri, M. A., Di Vincenzo, F. and Manzi, G. 2013. The human skeletal sample from Fewet. In Mori 2013a: 319–62.Google Scholar
Sterry, M. and Mattingly, D. J., with contributions by Ahmed, M., Savage, T., White, K. and Wilson, A. 2011. Reconnaissance survey of archaeological sites in the Murzuq area. Libyan Studies 42: 103–16.Google Scholar
Stockhammer, P. W. 2012. Conceptualizing cultural hybridization: A transdisciplinary approach. In Stockhammer, P. W. (ed.), Transcultural Research. Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context, Papers of the Conference, Heidelberg, 21–22 September 2009, Berlin und Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 4358.Google Scholar
Stockhammer, P. W. 2013. From hybridity to entanglement, from essentialism to practice. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 28.1:1128.Google Scholar
Smith, S. T. 2003. Wretched Kush: Ethnic Identities and Boundaries in Egypt’s Nubian Empire. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tafuri, M. A., Pelosi, A., Ricci, F. Manzi, G., and Castorina, F. 2013. The preliminary isotope investigation. In Mori 2013a: 363–68.Google Scholar
van Pelt, W. P. 2013. Introduction. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 28.1: 110.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 2012. Saharan trade: short-, medium- and long-distance trade networks in the Roman period. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 47.4: 409–49.Google Scholar
Yahiaoui, R., Dautria, J. M., Alard, O., Bosch, D., Azzouni-Sekkal, A. and Bodinier, J. L. 2014. A volcanic district between the Hoggar uplift and the Tenere Rifts: volcanology, geochemistry and age of the In-Ezzane lavas (Algerian Sahara). Journal of African Earth Sciences 92: 1420.Google Scholar
Zerboni, A. and Vignola, P. 2013. Green stone beads from the excavation in Fewet. In Mori 2013a: 157–67.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×