Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:12:16.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Mediatized Communication and Linguistic Reflexivity in Contemporary Public and Political Life

from Part VI - Discourses, Publics and Mediatization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2020

By
Cedric Deschrijver
Edited by
Anna De Fina  and
Alexandra Georgakopoulou
Anna De Fina
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Alexandra Georgakopoulou
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides an overview of the concept of “mediatization” and its different applications. It distinguishes “institutional,” “social constructionist” and “linguistic-anthropological” understandings of the concept. After defining and discussing each understanding, the chapter draws attention to how the linguistic-anthropological approach may be employed in discourse-analytical research. Specifically, the approach is argued to be highly amenable with a focus on metapragmatics. Much like a focus on metapragmatics reflects language users’ awareness of language use, mediatization may reflect their understanding of the nature of the communication they are engaged in. After providing several examples, the chapter discusses how discourse-analytic methods may further complement the development of mediatization frameworks. Looking ahead, these developments will need to take into account a surge in multimodal content, the increasingly global reach of communications, and ever-shifting social media potentials.

Keywords

Mediatizationrecontextualizationmetapragmaticsmedia logiccommoditizationaudience uptakeonlinecommunicationmultimodalityprosumption communicationglobal nature of
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies , pp. 687 - 707
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Agha’s linguistic-anthropological approach to mediatization emphasizes the importance of commoditized features of communication and their influence in the recontextualization of parts of discourse. It is recommended further reading, especially for a theory of how language/discourse travels across different communication media (cf. Briggs, 2011).

This revised account of the notion of “media logic” underpins (institutional) mediatization research and discusses the discourses of fear as developed and sustained by media logic.

The introduction to this edited volume offers a rich and comprehensive overview of mediatization research, its potential applications and its links with sociolinguistics. The volume overall is an indispensable tool for familiarizing oneself with mediatization research.

This social-constructionist account of mediatization in online discourses on economic affairs proposes the concept of “social mediatization” to account for the ever-growing importance of social media interactions in influencing and shifting modes of participation. It also illuminates the spread and recontextualization of elite terms/discourse in public settings.

The author provides a comprehensive overview of the ways in which technological change in communication has affected newspaper communication and how processes of communication may continue to be changed by technological developments.

Agha, A. (2011c). Meet Mediatization. Language & Communication 31: 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media Logic, Social Control, and Fear. Communication Theory 23: 223–38.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change: Key Concepts, Research Traditions, Open Issues. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 3–48.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. and Deschrijver, C. (2018). Introduction to the Special Issue: The Social Mediatization of the Economy: Texts, Discourses, and Participation. Language@Internet 16: article 1.Google Scholar
Schmitz, U. (2014). Semiotic Economy, Growth of Mass Media Discourse, and Change of Written Language through Multimodal Techniques: The Case of Newspapers (Printed and Online) and Web Services. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 279–304.Google Scholar

References

Adolf, M. (2011). Clarifying Mediatization: Sorting through a Current Debate. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3(2): 153–75.Google Scholar
Agha, A. (2011a). Commodity Registers. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(1): 22–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A. (2011b). Large and Small Scale Forms of Personhood. Language & Communication 31: 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A. (2011c). Meet Mediatization. Language & Communication 31: 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altheide, D. L. (2004). Media Logic and Political Communication. Political Communication 21: 293–6.Google Scholar
Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media Logic, Social Control, and Fear. Communication Theory 23: 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altheide, D. L. and Snow, R. P. (1992). Media Logic and Culture: Reply to Oakes. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 5(3): 465–72.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. W. (2011). Deliberative, Agonistic, and Algorithmic Audiences: Journalism’s Vision of Its Public in an Age of Audience Transparency. International Journal of Communication 5: 529–47.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change: Key Concepts, Research Traditions, Open Issues. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 3–48.Google Scholar
Block, E. (2013). A Culturalist Approach to the Concept of the Mediatization of Politics: The Age of “Media Hegemony.” Communication Theory 23: 259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C. L. (2011). On Virtual Epidemics and the Mediatization of Public Health. Language & Communication 31: 217–28.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. and Pellicer, R. (2012). Uptake (Un)limited: The Mediatization of Register Shifting in US Public Discourse. Language in Society 41: 449–70.Google Scholar
Cotter, C. (2014). Revising the “Journalist’s Bible”: How News Practitioners Respond to Language and Social Change. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 371–94.Google Scholar
Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling. New Media & Society 10(3): 373–91.Google Scholar
Couldry, N. and Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory 23: 191–202.Google Scholar
Davies, N. (2009). Flat Earth News. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Deacon, D. and Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key Concept or Conceptual Bandwagon? Media, Culture & Society 36(7): 1032–44.Google Scholar
Deschrijver, C. (2020). Metalinguistic Density as an Indicator of Sharedness: Economic and Financial Terms in Online Interaction. Language & Communication 71: 123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekström, M., Fornäs, J., Jansson, A. and Jerslev, A. (2016). Three Tasks for Mediatization Research: Contributions to an Open Agenda. Media, Culture & Society 38(7): 1090–108.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse & Society 4(2): 133–68.Google Scholar
Falasca, K. (2014). Political News Journalism: Mediatization across Three News Reporting Contexts. European Journal of Communication 29(5): 583–97.Google Scholar
Gehl, R. W. (2014). Reverse Engineering Social Media: Software, Culture, and Political Economy in New Media Capitalism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (1997). Self-Presentation and Interactional Alliances in E-mail Discourse: The Style- and Code-Switches of Greek Messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(2): 141–64.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. and Deschrijver, C. (2018). Introduction to the Special Issue: The Social Mediatization of the Economy: Texts, Discourses, and Participation. Language@Internet 16: article 1. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2018si/georgakopoulou.Google Scholar
Graber, K. (2012). Public Information: The Shifting Roles of Minority Language News Media in the Buryat Territories of Russia. Language & Communication 32: 124–36.Google Scholar
Hepp, A. (2013). The Communicative Figurations of Mediatized Worlds: Mediatization Research in Times of the “Mediation of Everything.” European Journal of Communication 28(6): 615–29.Google Scholar
Hepp, A. (2014). Mediatization: A Panorama of Media and Communication Research. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 49–66.Google Scholar
Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S. and Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the Interplay between Media, Culture and Society. Media, Culture & Society 37(2): 314–24.Google Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2008a). The Mediatization of Religion: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Religious Change. Northern Lights 6(1): 9–26.Google Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2008b). The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review 29(2): 105–34.Google Scholar
Hou, M. (2018). Economic News Comments on a Mobile News App: An Emerging Genre of Bashing. Language@Internet 16: article 4. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2018si/hou.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2009). Entextualization, Mediatization and Authentication: Orthographic Choice in Media Transcripts. Text & Talk 29(5): 571–94.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2011). Sociolinguistic Diversity in Mainstream Media: Authenticity, Authority and Processes of Mediation and Mediatization. Journal of Language and Politics 10(4): 562–86.Google Scholar
Jansson, A. (2002). The Mediatization of Consumption: Towards an Analytical Framework of Image Culture. Journal of Consumer Culture 2(1): 5–31.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and Sensitizing Conceptualizations of Mediatization. Communication Theory 23: 203–22.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. and Ensslin, A. (2007). Language in the Media: Theory and Practice. In Johnson, S. and Ensslin, A. (eds.) Language in the Media: Representation, Identities, Ideologies. London: Continuum. 3–24.Google Scholar
Kammer, A. (2013). The Mediatization of Journalism. MedieKultur 54: 141–58.Google Scholar
Knight Foundation. (2018). An Online Experimental Platform to Assess Trust in the Media. https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KnightFoundation_NewsLens1_Client_Report_070918_ab.pdfGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, H. (2013). Communicative Constructivism and Mediatization. Communication Theory 23: 97–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krotz, F. (2007). The Meta-process of “Mediatization” as a Conceptual Frame. Global Media and Communication 3(3): 256–60.Google Scholar
Krotz, F. (2009). Mediatization: A Concept with which to Grasp Media and Societal Change. In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. 21–40.Google Scholar
Krotz, F. and Hepp, A. (2013). A Concretization of Mediatization: How Mediatization Works and Why “Mediatized Worlds” Are a Helpful Concept for Empirical Mediatization Research. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3(2): 119–34.Google Scholar
Lampropoulou, S. (2018). Economy Talk as Blaming Strategy: Crisis Framings in The Guardian News Stories and Recontextualizations in User Comments during the Greek Bailout Referendum. Language@Internet 16: article 5. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2018si/lampropoulou.Google Scholar
Landerer, N. (2013). Rethinking the Logics: A Conceptual Framework for the Mediatization of Politics. Communication Theory 23: 239–58.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G. and Iyengar, S. (2017). The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect. American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 5–20.Google Scholar
Livingstone, S. (2009). Foreword: Coming to Terms with “Mediatization.” In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. ix–xi.Google Scholar
Lucy, J. A. (ed.) (1993). Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lundby, K. (2009). Media Logic: Looking for Social Interaction. In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. 101–119.Google Scholar
Maltby, S. (2012). The Mediatization of the Military. Media, War & Conflict 5(3): 255–68.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. D. (2015). Monitoring Persona: Mediatized Identity and the Edited Public Self. Frame: Journal of Literary Studies 28(1): 115–33.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2014). The Fourth Screen: Mediatization and the Smartphone. Mobile Media & Communication 2(2): 209–26.Google Scholar
Peleg, A. and Bogoch, B. (2012). Removing Justitia’s Blindfold: The Mediatization of Law in Israel. Media, Culture & Society 34(8): 961–78.Google Scholar
Peng, C.-Y. (2018). Mediatized Taiwan Mandarin: Social Perceptions and Language Ideologies. Chinese Language and Discourse 9(2): 162–83.Google Scholar
Rödder, S. and Schäfer, M. S. (2010). Repercussion and Resistance: An Empirical Study on the Interrelation between Science and Mass Media. Communications 35: 249–67. Schmitz, U. (2004). Sprache in modernen Medien. Berlin: E. Schmidt.Google Scholar
Rödder, S. and Schäfer, M. S. (2014). Semiotic Economy, Growth of Mass Media Discourse, and Change of Written Language through Multimodal Techniques: The Case of Newspapers (Printed and Online) and Web Services. In Androutsopoulous, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 279–304.Google Scholar
Schrott, A. (2009). Dimensions: Catch-All Label or Technical Term. In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. 41–61.Google Scholar
Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing Mediatisation as an Analytical Concept. European Journal of Communication 19(1): 87–101.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function. In Lucy, J. A. (ed.) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 33–58.Google Scholar
Skjulstad, S. (2009). Dressing Up: The Mediatization of Fashion Online. In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. 179–202.Google Scholar
Squires, L. and Iorio, J. (2014). Tweets in the News: Legitimizing Medium, Standardizing Form. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 331–60.Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J. and Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). Mediatization and Media Interventionism: A Comparative Analysis of Sweden and the United States. International Journal of Press/Politics 16(1): 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tewksbury, D. (2005). The Seeds of Audience Fragmentation: Specialization in the Use of Online News Sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49(3): 332–48.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. and Poff, M. (2013). Text Messaging. In Herring, S. C., Stein, D. and Virtanen, T. (eds.) Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 163–89.Google Scholar
Toffler, A. and Toffler, H. (2006). Revolutionary Wealth. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Van Hout, T. (2015). Review of the book Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(5): 714–18.Google Scholar
Van Hout, T. and Burger, P. (2017). Text Bite News: The Metapragmatics of Feature News. Text & Talk 37(4): 461–84.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (2000). Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use. Pragmatics 10(4): 439–56.Google Scholar
Wallsten, K. (2010). “Yes We Can”: How Online Viewership, Blog Discussion, Campaign Statements, and Mainstream Media Coverage Produced a Viral Video Phenomenon. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 7(2–3): 163–81.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Enquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition 15(1): 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeh, R. and Hopmann, D. N. (2013). Indicating Mediatization? Two Decades of Election Campaign Television Coverage. European Journal of Communication 28(3): 225–40.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×