Alturo, N., Clemente, I., & Payrató, L. (2016). Notes for a multilingual and multimodal functional discourse grammar. In Fernández-Villanueva, M. & Jungbluth, K. (Eds.), Beyond language boundaries: Multilingual use in multilingual contexts (pp. 3–33). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amades, J. (1957). El gest a Catalunya [Gesture in Catalonia]. Anales del Instituto de Lingüística [Annals of the Institute of Linguistics], VI, 88–148.Google Scholar

Austin, G. (1806). Chironomia; or, a treatise on rhetorical delivery. London (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words (2nd ed., 1975). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Barakat, R. A. (1973). Arabic gestures. Journal of Popular Culture, 6, 749–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barakat, R. A. (1975). The Cistercian sign language: A study in non-verbal communication. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications.Google Scholar

Bäuml, B. J., & Bäuml, F. H. (1975). A dictionary of gestures. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15, 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonaiuto, M., & Bonaiuto, T. (2014). Gestures and body language in Southern Europe. Italy. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1240–1253). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bonifacio, G. (2018). L’Arte de cenni [The art of nods.]. Vicenza (S. Gazzola. L’arte de’ cenni di Giovanni Bonifacio [The art of nods by Giovanni Bonifacio]. Treviso, Italy: ZeL Edizioni). (Original work published 1616)Google Scholar

Brault, G. J. (1963). Kinesics and the classroom: Some typical French gestures. The French Review, 36, 374–382.Google Scholar

Brewer, W. D. (1951). Patterns of gesture among the Levantine Arabs. American Anthropologist, 53(2), 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, H. J. (2001). O clever “He’s streetwise”. When gestures become quotable: The case of the clever gesture. Gesture, 1, 167–184. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7036CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, H. J. (2004). A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14, 186–224. https://doi.org/10.1525/JLIN.2004.14.2.186CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, H. J. (2005). What gestures do: Some communicative functions of quotable gestures in conversations among Black urban South Africans. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 2044–2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, H. J. (2011). Amangama amathathu “The three letters”: The emergence of a quotable gesture (emblem). Gesture, 11, 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.2.05broCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, H. J. (2014a). Gestures in South Africa. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1147–1153). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Brookes, H. J. (2014b). Gesture and taboo: A cross-cultural perspective. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1523–1530). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Brun, T. (1969). The international dictionary of sign language: A study of human behaviour. London, UK: Wolfe.Google Scholar

Bulwer, J. (1974). Chirologia: Or the natural language of the hand […]. London (Cleary, J. W. [Ed.]. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1644)Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1986). Des gestes et des mots pour le dire [Gestures and words to say it]. Paris, France: Clé International.Google Scholar

Cambridge Dictionary. (2021). Give sb the finger. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/give-sb-the-fingerGoogle Scholar

Cambridge Dictionary. (2021). Two fingers. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/two-fingersGoogle Scholar

Cardona, M. (1953–54). Gestos o ademanes habituales en Venezuela [Common gestures in Venezuela]. Archivos Venezolanos de Folklore [Venezuelan Folklore Archives], II(3), 159–166.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (2013). Cognitive linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 182–201). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2013). Ways of viewing metaphor in gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1766–1781). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. J. (2005). Image schemas and gesture. In Hampe, B. (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 421–442). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creider, C. A. (1977). Towards a description of East African gestures. Sign Language Studies, 14, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahan, G., & Cosnier, J. (1977). Sémiologie des quasi-linguistiques français [Semiology of French quasi-linguistics]. Psychologie Médicale [Medical Psychology], 9, 2053–2072.Google Scholar

Danguitsis, C. (1943). Étude descriptive du dialecte de Démirdési (Brousse, Asie Mineure) [Descriptive study of the dialect of Démirdési (Bush, Asia Minor)]. Paris, France: G.-P. Maisonneuve.Google Scholar

Debras, C. (2017). The shrug. Forms and meanings of a compound enactment. Gesture, 16, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.01debCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devereux, G. (1949). Some Mohave gestures. American Anthropologist, 51, 325–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. A tentative study of the spatio-temporal and “linguistic” aspects of the gestural behavior of eastern Jews and southern Italians in New York City, living under similar as well as different environmental conditions. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. (Original work published 1941 as Gesture and environment, New York, NY: King’s Crown)Google Scholar

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1972). Similarities and differences between cultures in expressive movements. In Hinde, R. A. (Ed.), Non-verbal communication (pp. 297–312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1972). Hand movements. Journal of Communication, 22, 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1972.tb00163.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture and composite utterances. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fornés, M. A., & Puig, M. (2008). El porqué de nuestros gestos. La Roma de ayer en la gestualidad de hoy [The reason for our gestures. The Rome of yesterday in today’s gestures]. Barcelona, Spain: Octaedro – Edicions UIB.Google Scholar

Galhano-Rodrigues, I. (2014). Gestures in Southwest Europe: Portugal. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1259–1266). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Geiger, P., & Weiss, R. (1950). Atlas der schweizerischen Volkskunde [Atlas of Swiss folklore]. Zürich, Switzerland: Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Volkskunde.Google Scholar

Gratiolet, L. P. (1865). De la physiognomie et des mouvements d’expression [Physiognomy and expressive movements]. Paris, France: Hetzel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, J. R. (1968). A gesture inventory for the teaching of Spanish. Philadelphia, PA: Chilton Books.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Hanna, B. E. (1996). Defining the emblem. Semiotica, 112, 289–358. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1996.112.3-4.289CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, F. C. (1940). Should we have a dictionary of gestures? Southern Folklore Quarterly, 4, 239–245.Google Scholar

Hayes, F. C. (1951). Gestos o ademanes folklóricos [Gestures or folk gestures]. Folklore Americas, 11, 15–21.Google Scholar

Hayes, F. C. (1959). Guía para el que recoge ademanes o gestos [Guide for those who collect gestures]. Folklore Americas, 19, 1–6.Google Scholar

Jehoul, A., Brône, G., & Feyaerts, K. (2017). The shrug as marker of obviousness. Linguistics Vanguard, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0082CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, H. G., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Communicative body movements: American emblems. Semiotica, 15, 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1975.15.4.335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. (1977). An extension of Oregon sawmill sign language. Current Anthropology, 18, 353–354. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jorio, A. de (2000). La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano. Naples: Stamperia del Fibreno (Naples: Associazione napoletana per i monumenti e il paesaggio, 1964 / Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity […]. With an introduction and notes by A. Kendon). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2000. (Original work published 1832)Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1981). Geography of gesture. Semiotica, 37, 129–163.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1988a). How gestures can become like words. In Poyatos, F. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto, Canada: C. J. Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1988b). Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, semiotic and communicative perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1990). Signs in the cloister and elsewhere. Semiotica, 79, 307–329.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1992). Some recent work from Italy on quotable gestures (“emblems”). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2, 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1525/JLIN.1992.2.1.92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2017). Reflections on the “gesture-first” hypothesis of language origins. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 24, 163. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1117-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kita, S. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802586188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreidlin, G. E. (2004). The Russian dictionary of gestures. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 173–193). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6. Retrieved from http://cognitextes.revues.org/406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2014). Recurrent gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Leite de Vasconcellos, J. (1925). A figa. Estudo de etnografia comparativa, precedido de algumas palavras a respeito do “sobrenatural” na medicina popular portuguesa [The fig. A study of comparative ethnography, preceded by a few words about the “supernatural” in Portuguese popular medicine]. Porto, Portugal: Araujo & Sobrinho.Google Scholar

Lindenberg, R., Uhlig, M., Scherfeld, D., Schlaug, G., & Seitz, R. J. (2011). Communication with emblematic gestures: Shared and distinct neural correlates of expression and reception. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21258Google ScholarPubMed

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2000). Introduction. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 1–10). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mallery, G. (1881a). The gesture speech of man. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 30, 283–313.Google Scholar

Mallery, G. (1881b). Sign language among North American Indians (compared with that among other peoples and deaf-mutes). Washington, Annual Reports of the Bureau of American Ethnology. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton, 1972.Google Scholar

Mallery, G. (1891). Greeting by gesture. Popular Science Monthly, Feb.–March, 477–490.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. C. (2013). Cultural similarities and differences in emblematic gestures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-012-0143-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meissner, M., & Philpott, S. B. (1975). A dictionary of sawmill workers’ signs. Sign Language Studies, 9, 309–347. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/07165/pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meo-Zilio, G. (1961a). El lenguaje de los gestos en el Uruguay [The language of gestures in Uruguay]. Boletín de Filología [Philology Bulletin] (Universidad de Chile), XIII, 75–163. Retrieved from https://boletinfilologia.uchile.cl/index.php/BDF/article/view/47446Google Scholar

Meo-Zilio, G. (1961b). El lenguaje de los gestos en el Río de la Plata [The language of gestures in the Río de la Plata]. Montevideo, Uruguay: Imp. Libertad.Google Scholar

Meo-Zilio, G., & Mejía, S. (1980–83). Diccionario de gestos. España e Hispanoamérica [Gesture dictionary. Spain and Latin America], Vol. 1 (1980) and Vol. 2 (1983). Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. R. (2014). Gestures and metonymy. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1746–1766). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Monahan, B. (1983). A dictionary of Russian gesture. Ann Arbor, MI: Hermitage.Google Scholar

Mondada, L. (2013). Multimodal interaction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 577–589). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their origins and distribution. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Müller, C., & Posner, R. (Eds.). (2004). The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.). (2013). Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.). (2014). Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Munari, B. (1963). Supplemento al dizionario italiano [Supplement to the Italian dictionary]. Milan, Italy: Muggiani.Google Scholar

Munari, B. (1994). Il dizionario dei gesti italiani [The dictionary of Italian gestures]. Rome, Italy: AdnKronos Libri.Google Scholar

Papas, W. (1972). Instant Greek (10th ed., 1981). Athens, Greece: Papas.Google Scholar

Parrill, F. (2008). Form, meaning, and convention: A comparison of a metaphorical gesture with an emblem. In Cienki, A. & Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 195–217). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payrató, L. (1993). A pragmatic view on autonomous gestures: A first repertoire of Catalan emblems. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90046-RCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payrató, L. (2001). Methodological remarks on the study of emblems: The need for common elicitation procedures. In Cavé, C., Guaïtella, I., & Santi, S. (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité. Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication (pp. 262–265). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Payrató, L. (2003). What does “the same gesture” mean? Emblematic gestures from some cognitive-linguistic theories. In Rector, M., Poggi, I., & Trigo, N. (Eds.), Gestures: Meaning and use (pp. 73–81). Porto, Portugal: Ediçoes Universidade Fernando Pessoa.Google Scholar

Payrató, L. (2004). Notes on pragmatic and social aspects of everyday gestures. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 103–113). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Payrató, L. (2008). Past, present, and future research on emblems in the Hispanic tradition: Preliminary and methodological considerations. Gesture, 8, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.1.03payCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payrató, L. (2014). Emblems or quotable gestures: Structures, categories, and functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1474–1481). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Payrató, L., & Clemente, I. (2020). Gestures we live by. The pragmatics of emblematic gestures. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Payrató, L., & Teßendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1531–1539). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Pitrè, G. (1889). Usi e costumi [,] credenze e pregiudizi del popolo siciliano (Vol. 2) [Habits and customs [,] beliefs and prejudices of the Sicilian people (Vol. 2)]. Palermo, Italy: Libreria L. Pedone Lauriel di Carlo Clausen.Google Scholar

Poggi, I. (1983). “La mano a borsa”: analisi semantica di un gesto emblematico olofrastico [“The purse hand”: Semantic analysis of an emblematic holophrastic gesture]. In Attili, G. & Ricci-Bitti, P. E. (Eds.), Comunicare senza parole. La communicazione non-verbale nel bambino e nell’interazione sociale tra adulti [Communicate without words. Non-verbal communication in children and in social interaction between adults] (2nd ed., 1984, pp. 219–238). Rome, Italy: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

Poggi, I. (2002). Symbolic gestures: The case of the Italian gestionary. Gesture, 2, 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.1.05pogCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poggi, I. (2007). Mind, hands, face and body: A goal and belief view of multimodal communication. Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Poggi, I. (2014). Semantics and pragmatics of symbolic gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1481–1496). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Poggi, I., & Magno Caldognetto, E. (1997). Mani che parlano. Gesti e psicologia della comunicazione [Hands that speak. Gestures and the psychology of communication]. Padua, Italy: Unipress.Google Scholar

Posner, R. (2003). Everyday gestures as a result of ritualization. In Rector, M., Poggi, I., & Trigo, N. (Eds.), Gestures: Meaning and use (pp. 217–229). Porto, Portugal: Ediçoes Universidade Fernando Pessoa.Google Scholar

Poyatos, F. (1975). Gesture inventories: Fieldwork methodology and problems. Semiotica, 13, 199–227.Google Scholar

Rector, M. (2014). Gestures in South America: Spanish and Portuguese. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1175–1181). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Rector, M., & Trigo, S. (2004). Body signs: Portuguese communication on three continents. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 195–204). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Reiter, S. (2014). Gestures in South American indigenous cultures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1182–1193). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Rohlfs, G. (1959). Influence des élements autochtones sur les langues romanes (Problèmes de géographie linguistique) [Influence of indigenous elements on Romance languages (Problems of linguistic geography)]. Actes du Colloque International de Civilisations, Littératures et Langues Romanes [Proceedings of the International Conference on Civilizations, Literatures and Romance Languages]. Bucharest [1960], 240–247.Google Scholar

Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saitz, R. L., & Cervenka, E. J. (1972). Handbook of gestures: Colombia and the United States. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuler, E. A. (1944). V for victory: A study in symbolic social control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 283–299.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serenari, M. (2003). Examples from the Berlin dictionary of everyday gestures. In Rector, M., Poggi, I., & Trigo, N. (Eds.), Gestures: Meaning and use (pp. 111–117). Porto, Portugal: Ediçoes Universidade Fernando Pessoa.Google Scholar

Serenari, M. (2004). The structure of dictionary entries – results of empirical investigations. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 15–32). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Sherzer, J. (1973). Verbal and nonverbal deixis: the pointed lip gesture among the San Blas Cuna. Language and Society, 2, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000087CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherzer, J. (1991). The Brazilian thumbs-up gesture. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 1, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1525/JLIN.1991.1.2.189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slama-Cazacu, T. (1976). Nonverbal components in message sequence: “Mixed syntax.” In McCormack, W. C. & Wurm, S. A. (Eds.), Language and man: Anthropological issues (pp. 217–227). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar

Sparhawk, C. M. (1978). Contrastive-identificational features of Persian gesture. Semiotica, 24, 49–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1978.24.1-2.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed., 1995). Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Takagaki, T., Ueda, H, Martinell, E., & Gelabert, M. J. (1998). Pequeño diccionario de gestos españoles [Small dictionary of Spanish gestures]. Tokyo, Japan: Hakusuisha. Retrieved (summary version) from https://lecture.ecc.utokyo.ac.jp/~cueda/gakusyu/gestos/index.html#[[Inicio]]Google Scholar

Taylor, A. (1956). The Shanghai gesture. Folklore Fellowship Communications, 166, 1–76.Google Scholar

Teßendorf, S. (2013). Emblems, quotable gestures, or conventionalized body movements. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 82–100). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wundt, W. (1973). Völkerpsychologie. I. Die Sprache [Peoples’ psychology. I. Language]. Stuttgart, Germany (Chapter 2 translated to English in The language of gestures) The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton (Original work published 1900)Google Scholar

Xua, J., Gannon, P. J., Emmorey, K., Smith, J. F., & Braun, A. R. (2009). Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(49), 20664–20669. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909197106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Retrieved from www.salc-sssk.org/pages/andren.mats/refs/andren2010-thesis.pdfGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D. F. (2002). Original signs: Gesture, sign, and the sources of language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. (Original work published 1999.)Google Scholar

Barakat, R. A. (1969). Gesture systems. Keystone Folklore Quarterly, 14, 105–121.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15, 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2016). Grammatical aspect and gesture in French: A kinesiological approach. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 20(3), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-14745Google Scholar

Bressem, J. (2014). Repetitions in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1641–1649). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. (2021). Repetitions in gesture: A cognitive-linguistic and usage-based perspective. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110697902CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014a). The family of AWAY gestures. Negation, refusal and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1605). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1592Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014b). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1592). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2017). The “Negative-Assessment-Construction” – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). 20160053. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J., & Wegener, C. (2021). Handling talk: A cross-linguistic perspective on discursive functions of gestures in German and Savosavo. Gesture, 20(2), 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19041.breCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, H. (2001). O clever “He’s streetwise”: When gestures become quotable. Gesture, 1(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.05broCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, H., & Le Guen, O. (2019). Gesture studies and anthropological perspectives: An introduction. Gesture, 18(2–3), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.00040.broCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2003). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.3.1.03calCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (2008). From left to right … : Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In Cienki, A. & Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 27–53). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A. (2017). Utterance construction grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160048. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0048CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.). (2018). Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conlin, F., Hagstrom, P., & Neidle, C. (2003). A particle of indefiniteness in American Sign Language. Linguistic Discovery, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.62Google Scholar

Cooperrider, K. (2019). Universals and diversity in gesture: Research past, present, and future. Gesture, 18(2–3), 209–238. https://doi:10.1075/gest.19011.cooCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooperrider, K., Abner, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2018). The Palm-Up Puzzle: Meanings and origins of a widespread form in gesture and sign. Frontiers in Communication, 3, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Paolo, E., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, S. D. (2002). Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture, 2(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.04dunCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. (Original work published 1941.)Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, E. (2002). Gestures in signing: The presentation gesture in Danish Sign Language. In Schulmeister, R. & Reinitzer, H. (Eds.), Progress in sign language research: In honor of Siegmund Prillwitz / Festschrift für Siegmund Prillwitz (pp. 143–162). Hamburg, Germany: Signum.Google Scholar

Fenlon, J., Cooperrider, K., Keane, J., Brentari, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2019). Comparing sign language and gesture: Insights from pointing. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.499CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fricke, E. (2010). Phonaestheme, Kinaestheme und multimodale Grammatik: Wie Artikulationen zu Typen werden, die bedeuten können [Phonaesthemes, kinaesthemes, and multimodal grammar: How articulations become types that can mean]. Sprache und Literatur [Language and Literature,], 41(105), 70–88.Google Scholar

Fricke, E., Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014). Gesture families and gesture fields. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1630–1640). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. (2018). The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S., & Ladewig, S. H. (2021). Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture, 20(2), 153–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21003.harCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, A. (1984). Everyday life. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. (Trans. D. Carr.) Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936)Google Scholar

Janzen, T., & Shaffer, B. (2002). Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Meier, R. P., Cormier, K., & Quinto-Pozos, D. (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 199–223). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janzen, T. (2012). Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 816–840). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.816CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jorio, A. de (2000). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. A translation of La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano (Fibreno, Naples 1832) and with an introduction and notes by Adam Kendon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1980). A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Engaprovince of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion: Part I. Semiotica, 31(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.31.1-2.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1981). Geography of gesture. Semiotica, 37(1/2), 129–163.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In Poyatos, F. (Ed.), Crosscultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto, Canada: C. J. Hogrefe, Publishers.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1996). An agenda for gesture studies. The Semiotic Review of Books, 7(3), 7–12.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klima, E. S., & Beluggi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2010). Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern – Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste [Describing, searching and prompting – variants of a recurrent gesture]. Sprache und Literatur [Language and Literature], 41(1), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6. https://doi:10.4000/cognitextes.406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2014a). The cyclic gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1605–1618). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2014b). Recurrent gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1558–1575). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2020). Integrating gestures. The dimension of multimodality in cognitive grammar. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanwer, J. P. (2017). Apposition: A multimodal construction? The multimodality of linguistic constructions in the light of usage-based theory. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160071. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0071CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning : Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lempert, M. (2011). Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11(3), 241–270. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.01lemCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lempert, M. (2017). Uncommon resemblance: Pragmatic affinity in political gesture. Gesture, 16(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.02lemCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luginbühl, M., & Schneider, J. G. (2020). Medial shaping from the outset: On the mediality of the second presidential debate, 2016. Journal für Medienlinguistik [Journal for Media Linguistics], 3(1), 57–93. https://doi.org/10.21248/jfml.2020.34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D. (2013). The co-evolution of gesture and speech, and downstream consequences. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Cienki, A., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 480–512). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

McNeill, D., & Sowa, C. (2011). Birth of a morph. In Stam, G. & Ishino, M. (Eds.), Integrating gestures. The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 27–48). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2017). Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160047. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mosher, J. A. (1916). The essentials of effective gesture for students of public speaking. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 234–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2010). Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive [How gestures mean. A cognitive-linguistic and sequence-analytic perspective]. Sprache und Literatur [Language and Literature], 41(105), 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. (2013). Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 202–217). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2014). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2017). How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16(2), 278–306. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mulCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. (2018). Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1651. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H. (2013). Towards a grammar of gesture: A form-based view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Tessendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 707–733). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Neville, H. (1904). Gesture. In Blackman, R. D. (Ed.), Voice, speech and gesture: A practical handbook to the elocutionary art (pp. 103–169). Edinburgh, UK: Grant.Google Scholar

Ott, E. A. (1902). How to gesture. New York, NY: Hinds & Noble.Google Scholar

Payrató, L., & Teßendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1531–1539). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (2006). Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign language. Linguistics in Potsdam 24(3), 3–98.Google Scholar

Quintilian, M. F. (1969). The “Institutio Oratoria” of Quintilian with an English translation by H. E. Butler. The Loeb Classical Library. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2003). Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken/Basic Elements of a Theory of Social. Zeitschrift für Soziologie [Journal for Sociology], 32(4), 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2003-0401CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, J. (2005). Two concepts of practices. In Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. K., & von Savigny., E. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 198–208). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ruth-Hirrel, L. (2018). A construction-based approach to cyclic gesture functions in English and Farsi [Doctoral dissertation]. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA. Retrieved from https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etdsGoogle Scholar

Ruth-Hirrel, L., & Wilcox, S. (2018). Speech-gesture constructions in cognitive grammar: The case of beats and points. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 453–493. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. K., & Von Savigny, E. (2005). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Scheflen, A. E. (1973). How behavior means. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar

Schoonjans, S. (2017). Multimodal construction grammar issues are construction grammar issues. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160050. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0050CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarz, E. (2010). Habitualisierung und Sedimentierung. Zur Phänomenologie der Person [Habitualization and sedimentation. On the phenomenology of the person]. Filozofický časopis [Philosophical Magazine], Sonderband [Special Edition], 69–88.Google Scholar

Shaffer, B. (2000). A syntactic, pragmatic analysis of the expression of necessity and possibility in American Sign Language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.Google Scholar

Shaffer, B., & Janzen, T. (2000). Gesture, lexical words, and grammar: Grammaticalization processes in ASL. In Conathan, J. L., Good, J., Kavitskaya, D., Wulf, A. B., & Yu, A. C. L. (Eds.) Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 26 (pp. 235–245). Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar

Sherzer, J. (1991). The Brazilian thumbs-up gesture. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 1(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1991.1.2.189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sparhawk, C. (1978). Contrastive-identificational features of Persian gesture. Semiotica, 24(1/2), 49–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1978.24.1-2.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J. (2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 154–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J. (2013). Praxeology of gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 674–685). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2016). Gestische Praxis und sprachliche Form [Gestural practice and linguistic form]. In Deppermann, A., Feilke, H., & Linke, A. (Eds.), Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken [Linguistic and communicative practices] (pp. 57–80). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teßendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic and metaphoric gestures– combining functional with cognitive approaches. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1540–1558). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

van Loon, E., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (2014). The grammaticalization of gestures in sign languages. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 2133–2149). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wehling, E. (2017). Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.04wehCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilcox, S. (2004). Gesture and language. Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture, 4(1), 43–73. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.04wilCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilcox, S. (2005). Routes from gesture to language. Revista da ABRALIN – Associação Brasileira de Lingüística [ABRALIN Magazine – Brazilian Linguistics Association], 4 (1–2), 11–45.Google Scholar

Wilcox, S., Rossini, P., & Pizzuto, E. A. (2010). Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Brentari, D. (Ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 332–354). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Woelert, P. (2011). Der Leib als Umschlagstelle von Raum und symbolischem Denken [The body as a transition point of space and symbolic thought]. In Alpsancar, S., Gehring, P., & Rölli, M. (Eds.), Raumprobleme [Space problems] (pp. 39–52). München, Germany: Wilhelm Fink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wundt, W. (1901). Völkerpyschologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Die Sprache [Peoples’ psychology: An investigation of the developmental laws of language, myth, and custom. Language]. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Zima, E. (2017). On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160055. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0055CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zima, E., & Bergs, A. (2017). Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20161006. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0055CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, L. Q. (2000). Nonverbal accommodations in foreign language teacher talk. Applied Language Learning, 11(1), 155–176.Google Scholar

Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar

Bavelas, J., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15(4), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergmann, K., & Kopp, S. (2010). Modeling the production of coverbal iconic gestures by learning Bayesian decision networks. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 24(6), 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2010.492162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouvet, D. (1997). Le corps et la métaphore dans les langues gestuelles: A la recherche des modes de production des signes [The body and metaphor in gestural languages: In search of the modes of production of signs]. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Bremner, P., & Leonards, U. (2016). Iconic gestures for robot avatars, recognition and integration with speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bressem, J. (2013). Empirical research of body, language, and communication. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 393–416). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014a). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014b). The family of away gestures. Negation, refusal and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., Stein, N., & Wegener, C. (2017). Multimodal language use in Savosavo: Refusing, excluding and negating with speech and gesture. Pragmatics, 27(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.2.01breGoogle Scholar

Bühler, K. (1982). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache [Theory of Language: The representational function of language]. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capirci, O., Contaldo, A., Caselli, M. C., & Volterra, V. (2005). From action to language through gesture: A longitudinal perspective. Gesture, 5, 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.5.1.12capGoogle Scholar

Capirci, O., & Volterra, V. (2008). Gesture and speech: The emergence and development of a strong and changing partnership. Gesture, 8(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.1.04capCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expression. In Koenig, J.-P. (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (2013). Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.13cieCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooperrider, K., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). Gesture, language, and cognition. In Dancygier, B. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 118–134). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.2.01cooCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooperrider, K., & Núñez, R. (2012). Nose-pointing: Notes on a facial gesture of Papua New Guinea. Gesture, 12(2), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.2.01cooCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danaher, D. S. (1998). Peirce’s semiotic and cognitive metaphor theory. Semiotica, 119(1/2), 171–207.Google Scholar

Devylder, S. (2018). Diagrammatic iconicity explains asymmetries in Paamese possessive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(2), 313–348. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0058CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Wit, J. (2022). I like the way you move: Robots that gesture, and their potential as second language tutors for children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tilburg University, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

de Wit, J., Willemsen, B., de Haas, M., van den Berghe, R., Leseman, P., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Verhagen, J., Vogt, P., & Krahmer, E. (2022). Designing and evaluating iconic gestures for child–robot second language learning. Interacting with Computers, 33(6), 596–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwac013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Di Paolo, E., Cuffari, E., & De Jaeger, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dudis, P. (2004). Body partitioning and real space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (2011). Elements of formulation. In Streeck, J., Goodwin, C. & LeBaron, C. (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and the body in the material world (pp. 59–66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fenlon, J., Cormier, K., Rentelis, R., Schembri, A., Rowley, K., Adam, R., & Woll, B. (2014). BSL SignBank: A lexical database of British Sign Language (1st ed.). London, UK: Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London. https://bslsignbank.ucl.ac.uk/dictionary/Google Scholar

Ferrara, L., & Hodge, G. (2018). Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul, Republic of Korea: Hanshin.Google Scholar

Fricke, E. (2007). Origo, Geste und Raum: Lokaldeixis im Deutschen [Origo, gesture, and space: Spatial deixis in German]. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fricke, E. (2012). Grammatik multimodal: Wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken [Multimodal grammar: How words and gestures interact]. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaby, A. (2016). Hyponymy and the structure of Kuuk Thaayorre kinship. In J.-C. Verstraete, & D. Hafner, (Eds.), Land and language in Cape York Peninsula and the Gulf Country (pp. 159–178). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/clu.18.08gabCrossRefGoogle Scholar

GibbsJr, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gregersen, T., Olivares-Chuat, G., & Storm, J. (2009). An examination of L1 and L2 gesture use: What role does proficiency play? The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00856.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gullberg, M. (2014). Gestures and second language acquisition. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1868–1874). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Haiman, J. (Ed.). (1985). Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, J. (2008). In defence of iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassemer, J., & McCleary, L. (2018). The multidimensionality of pointing. Gesture, 17(3), 416–461. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.17018.hasCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinnell, J. (2018). The multimodal marking of aspect: The case of five periphrastic auxiliary constructions in North American English. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(4), 773–806. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinnell, J. (2019). The verbal-kinesic enactment of contrast in North American English. The American Journal of Semiotics, 35(1–2), 55–92. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs20198754CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinnell, J. (2020). Language in the body: Multimodality in grammar and discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.Google Scholar

Hodge, G., & Ferrara, L. (2022). Iconicity as multimodal, polysemiotic, and plurifunctional. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 808896. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holler, J. & Levinson, S. (2014). The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 369(1651), 20130302. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0302Google Scholar

Holler, J., Shovelton, H., & Beattie, G. (2009). Do iconic hand gestures really contribute to the communication of semantic information in a face-to-face context? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-008-0063-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gesture as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 495–514. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jakobson, R. (1966). Quest for the essence of language. In Waugh, L. R. & Monville-Burston, M. (Eds.), Roman Jakobson: On language (pp. 407–421). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R., & Pomorska, K. (1983). Dialogues. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janzen, T., & Shaffer, B. (2002). Gesture as substrate in the process of ASL grammaticalization. In Meier, R. P., Cormier, K., & Quintos-Pozos, D. (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken language (pp. 199–223). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janzen, T. & Shaffer, B. (Eds.). (2022). Signed language and gesture research in cognitive linguistics. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, T. (1996). Function and medium in the forms of linguistic expression found in a sign language. In Edmondson, W. H. & Wilbur, R. (Eds.), International review of sign linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 57–94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802365567CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2009). Language’s matrix. Gesture, 9(3), 352–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2014). Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of “language.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kida, T. (2005). Appropriation du geste par les étrangers: Le Cas d’étudiants japonais apprenant le français [The adoption of gestures by foreigners: The case of Japanese students learning French] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Provence, Aix-Marseille I, France.Google Scholar

Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S., Alibali, M. W., & Chu, M. (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124(3), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kita, S., Danziger, E., & Stolz, C. (2001). Cultural specificity of spatial schemas, as manifested in spontaneous gestures. In Gattis, M. (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 115–146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S., & Emmorey, K. (2023). Gesture links language and cognition for spoken and signed languages. Nature Review Psychology, 2, 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00186-90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kopp, S. (2017). Computational gesture research: Studying the functions of gesture in human–agent interaction. In Church, R. B., Alibali, M. W., & Kelly, S. D. (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating (pp. 267–284). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00249.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebal, K. & Oña, L. (2018). Different approaches to meaning in primate gestural and vocal communication. Frontiers of Psychology, 9, 478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D., Cassell, J., and Levy, E. T. (1993). Abstract deixis. Semiotica, 95(1/2), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1993.95.1-2.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. D. (2000). Growth points in thinking for speaking. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macedonia, M., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 32(6), 982–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mandel, M. (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Friedman, L. (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 57–107). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Mayberry, R. I. & Nicoladis, E. (2000). Gesture reflects language development: Evidence from bilingual children. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00092CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2008). Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In Cienki, A. & Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 115–154). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2013). The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 755–784). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2014). Gestures and iconicity. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1712–1732). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2017). Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), 20160047. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2018). Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture data analysis. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2019a). Visuo-kinetic signs are inherently metonymic: How embodied metonymy motivates forms, functions, and schematic patterns in gesture. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mittelberg, I. (2019b). Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica, 228, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0090CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I., & Evola, V. (2014). Iconic and representational gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1732–1746). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. & Hinnell, J. (2022). Gesture studies and semiotics. In Pelkey, J. & Cobley, P. (Eds.), Semiotic movements (pp. 183–214). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. & Rekittke, L.-M. (2021). Frames und Diagramme im Dialog: Indexikalische und Ikonische Zeichenmodi im Verbal-Gestischen Konstruieren von Reiserouten [Frames and diagrams in dialogue: Indexical and iconic sign modes in verbo-gestural constructions of travel itineraries]. Zeitschrift für Semiotik [Journal for Semiotics], 43(1–2), 81–116.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. R. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–358). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L.R. (2014). Gestures and metonymy. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1747–1766). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (1998a). Iconicity and gesture. In Santi, S., Guaïtella, I., Cave, C., & Konopczynski, G. (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale et interaction (pp. 321–328). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (1998b). Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich [Co-speech gesture: Cultural history, theory, linguistic comparison]. Berlin, Germany: Spitz Verlag.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gesture (pp. 233–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2014). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2017). Waking metaphors: Embodied cognition in multimodal discourse. In Hampe, B. (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 297–316). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C., Ladewig, S. H., & Bressem, J. (2013). Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 55–81). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicoladis, E. (2002). Some gestures develop in conjunction with spoken language development and others don’t: Evidence from bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26(4), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicoladis, E. (2007). The effect of bilingualism on the use of manual gestures. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1017.S0142716407070245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicoladis, E., Mayberry, R. I., & Genesee, F. (1999). Gesture and early bilingual development. Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 514–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nielsen, A. K. & Dingemanse, M. (2021). Iconicity in word learning and beyond: A critical review. Language and Speech, 64(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920914339CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Özyürek, A. (2018a). Cross-linguistic variation in children’s multimodal utterances. In Hickmann, M., Veneziano, E., & Jisa, H. (Eds.), Sources of variation in first language acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners (pp. 123–138). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Özyürek, A. (2018b). Role of gesture in language processing: Toward a unified account for production and comprehension. In Rueschemeyer, S.-A. & Gaskell, M. G. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 592–607). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A. (2005). How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5(1/2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.5.1.15ozyCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrill, F. (2009). Dual viewpoint gestures. Gesture, 9(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.9.3.01parCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1931–58). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, Hartshorne, C. & Weiss, P. (Eds.), vols. 7–8, Burks, A. (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited as CP. (Original work published 1866–1913)Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1955). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs (1893–1920). In Bucher, J. (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York, NY: Dover.Google Scholar

Perlman, M., Clark, N., & Tanner, J. E. (2014). Iconicity and ape gesture. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference: The evolution of language (pp. 228–235). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

Perniss, P., Özyürek, A., & Morgan, G. (2015). The influence of the visual modality on language structure and conventionalization: Insights from sign language and gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perniss, P., Thompson, R., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), Article 20130300. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohlfing, K. J. (2019). Learning language from the use of gestures. In Horst, J., & J. von Torkildsen, Koss (Eds.), International handbook of language acquisition (pp. 213–233). London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandler, W., Gullberg, M., & Padden, C. (Eds.). (2019). Visual language. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1765. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01765CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saussure, F. de (1986). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. (Original work published 1916)Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1991). Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.1.1.01sloGoogle Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. (2014). Some issues in the semiotics of gesture: The perspective of comparative semiotics. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol., 2, pp. 1989–1999). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Stam, G. A. (2006). Changes in patterns of thinking with second language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Stam, G. (2015). Changes in thinking for speaking: A longitudinal case study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 83–99. www.jstor.org/stable/43650100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stec, K. (2012) Meaningful shifts: A review of viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture, 12(3), 327–360. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.3.03steCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stefanini, S., Bello, A., Caselli, M. C., Iverson, J. M., & Volterra, V. (2009). Co-speech gestures in a naming task: Developmental data. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802187755CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sueyoshi, A. & Hardison, D. M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(4), 661–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00320.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweetser, E. E. (2009). What does it mean to compare language and gesture? Modalities and contrasts. In Guo, J., Liven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K., & Özcaliskan, S. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 357–366). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Sweetser, E. E. (2023). Gestural meaning is in the body(-space) as much as in the hands. In Janzen, T. & Shaffer, B. (Eds.), Signed language and gesture research in cognitive linguistics (pp. 157–180). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Taub, S. F. (2000). Iconicity in American sign language: Concrete and metaphorical applications. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011440231221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taub, S. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waugh, L. R. (1992). Presidential address: Let’s take the con out of iconicity: Constraints on iconicity in the lexicon. American Journal of Semiotics, 9(1), 7–48. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs19929132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wehling, E. (2017). Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.04wehCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilcox, S. (2004). Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilcox, S. & Occhino, C. (2017). Signed languages. In Dancygier, B. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 99–117). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wundt, W. (1973). A psychology of gesture (J. S. Thayer, C. M. Greenleaf, & M. D. Silberman, Trans.). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar

Zlatev, J. (2014). Image schemas, mimetic schemas, and children’s gestures. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2014-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context. Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–91). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1982a). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1982b). The deictic field of language and deictic words. In Jarvella, R. J. & Klein, W. (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 9–30). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1990). Theory of language. The representational function of language. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. (Original work published 1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar