Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T07:57:17.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Language Aptitudes in L2 Acquisition

from Part IV - Individual Differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

By
Gisela Granena
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

Some adults learn a second language (L2) more rapidly and/or to a higher level of proficiency than others. One of the factors that can explain such individual differences (IDs) in rate of acquisition and/or ultimate attainment is language aptitude, defined as a combination of cognitive and perceptual abilities that are advantageous in second language acquisition (SLA; Carroll, 1981; Doughty et al., 2010). This chapter provides a state-of-the-field overview of language aptitude research in SLA. A blend of theory and empirical work on this area, the chapter offers an approach to understanding and measuring aptitude components and functions in L2 learning. Starting with a review of the past and present of the construct, with a special emphasis on recent advances, the chapter moves on to a discussion of its predictive validity in naturalistic and instructed SLA and ends with a look into the future by analysing the implications of aptitude research for L2 instruction.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 390 - 408
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509.Google Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.Google Scholar
Arroyo, D., & Yilmaz, Y. (in press). The role of language analytic ability in the effectiveness of different feedback timing conditions. In Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the Interaction Approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 366–377.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 175–198.Google Scholar
Block, J. H. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bracht, G. H. (1970). Experimental factors related to aptitude-treatment interactions. Review of Educational Research, 40, 627–645.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Training research and education (pp. 87–136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1966). A parametric study of language training in the Peace Corps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research in foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. (ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In Parry, T. S. & Stansfield, C. W. (eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 11–29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: Form A. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (2002). Manual for the MLAT. Second Language Testing. North Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing, Inc.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
De Graaff, R. (1997). The Esperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–276.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age-effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413–438.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62, 189–200.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. J.., Campbell, S. G., Bunting, M. F., Mislevy, M. A., Bowles, A. R., & Koeth, J. T. (2010). Predicting near-native L2 ability. In Prior, Matthew T., Watanabe, Yukiko, & Lee, Sang-Ki (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum: Exploring SLA perspectives, positions, and practices. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J. (2016). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity: A replication. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 279–302). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2012). Age differences and cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning in ultimate L2 attainment. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2013a). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2013b). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63, 665–703.Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29, 311–343.Google Scholar
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379–400.Google Scholar
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (2002). Age, aptitude, and second language learning on a bilingual exchange. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 302–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hoyer, W. J., & Lincourt, A. E. (1998). Ageing and the development of learning. In Stadler, M. A. & Frensch, P. A. (eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 445–470). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational Constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513–541.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Shah, P. (2011). Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10081–10086.Google Scholar
Janacsek, K., Fiser, J., & Nemeth, D. (2012). The best time to acquire new skills: Age related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. Developmental Science, 15, 496–505.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 634–654.Google Scholar
Linck, J., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., Silbert, N., Tare, M., Jackson, S., Smith, B., Bunting. M. & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 287–317.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2017). Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): Geopolitics, methodological issues, and some major research questions. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 1, 7–44.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. (2009). The handbook of language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Markessinis, J. (1968). Summary of Dr. John B. Carroll’s “The Foreign Language Attainments of Language Majors in the Senior Year”. Washington, D.C.: Peace Corps.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. & Bourne, L. Jr. (eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Novoa, L. K., Fein, D., & Obler, L. (1988). Talent in foreign languages: A case study. In Obler, L. K. & Fein, D. (eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 294–302). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 888–896.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (2008). Implicit learning of natural language syntax. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2006). Dissociating implicit and explicit learning of natural language syntax. In Sun, R. & Miyake, N. (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. N. (2009). Implicit learning of word order. In Taatgen, N. A. & van Rijn, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 425–430). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Révész, A. (2012), Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93–132.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283–331.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45–99.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2002). Individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory during adult incidental second language learning: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991). In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2007). Aptitudes, abilities, contexts and practice. In DeKeyser, R. M. (ed.), Practice in second language learning: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 256–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sáfár, A., & Kormos, J. (2008). Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 46, 113–136.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27–52.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621.Google Scholar
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and instructed second language learning (pp. 319–353). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36, 367–384.Google Scholar
Skinner, E. I., & Fernandes, M. A. (2007). Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2163–2179.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1995). Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native and foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 638–655.Google Scholar
Speciale, G., Ellis, N., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 293–321.Google Scholar
Tagarelli, K., Borges-Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2011). The role of working memory in implicit and explicit language learning. In Carlson, L., Hölscher, C., & Shipley, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2061–2066). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 144–171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vatz, K., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Aptitude-treatment interaction studies in second language acquisition: Findings and methodology. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 271–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1–48.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.Google Scholar
Woltz, D. J. (2003). Implicit cognitive processes as aptitudes for learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 95–104.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–368.Google Scholar
Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Components of episodic memory: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 356, 1363–1374.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×