Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part 1 Prosody and Phonology
- Part 2 Inflectional and Derivational Morphology
- Part 3 Syntax
- 13 Agreement
- 14 Wh-Constructions and Wh-Dependencies
- 15 Coordination and Subordination in Slavic Languages
- 16 Numerals and Quantity Expressions
- 17 Placement and Ordering of the (En)clitics
- 18 Secondary Predication
- 19 Negation and Polarity
- 20 Null Subjects
- 21 Voice
- 22 Morphosyntactic Reflexes of Information Structure
- Part 4 Lexicon
- Part 5 Sociolinguistic and Geographical Approaches
- Part 6 Experimental and Quantitative Approaches
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
18 - Secondary Predication
from Part 3 - Syntax
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part 1 Prosody and Phonology
- Part 2 Inflectional and Derivational Morphology
- Part 3 Syntax
- 13 Agreement
- 14 Wh-Constructions and Wh-Dependencies
- 15 Coordination and Subordination in Slavic Languages
- 16 Numerals and Quantity Expressions
- 17 Placement and Ordering of the (En)clitics
- 18 Secondary Predication
- 19 Negation and Polarity
- 20 Null Subjects
- 21 Voice
- 22 Morphosyntactic Reflexes of Information Structure
- Part 4 Lexicon
- Part 5 Sociolinguistic and Geographical Approaches
- Part 6 Experimental and Quantitative Approaches
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
This chapter addresses secondary predicates (SPs), those elements conveying an additional predication on top of the first predication featured by the main verbal form. Slavic secondary predicates follow the regular pattern, typical of most Indo-European languages, of a non-verbal element related to an argument in the clause. Having defined the concept, the author discusses the following types of this phenomenon in Slavic languages: (a) depictive secondary predication and (b) regular (final state) and trajectory resultative constructions. She also presents non-verbal predicates in argument position, which share some features with secondary predication.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics , pp. 385 - 404Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Arsenijević, B. (2007). Slavic verb prefixes are resultative. In de Saussure, L., Moeschler, J., & Puskás, G., eds., Tense, Mood and Aspect: Theoretical and Descriptive Issues, New York, NY: Brill, pp. 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. (2001). The case of Slavic predicates. In Strigin, A. et al., eds., ZAS Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Berlin: ZAS, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. & Rubin, E. J. (1991). The unification of instrumental case assignment in Russian. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 9(1), 99–126.Google Scholar
Borkovskij, V. I. (1978). Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka: sintaksis – prostoe predloženie, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1974). The second dative: A transformational approach. In Brecht, R. & Chvany, C., eds., Slavic Transformational Syntax, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, pp. 123–150.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (1995). Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (2014). The overgeneration problem and the case of semipredicatives in Russian. In Bondaruk, A., Dalmi, G., & Grosu, A., eds., Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, Agreement, and Case, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–60.Google Scholar
Franks, S. & Hornstein, N. (1992). Second predication in Russian and proper government of PRO. In Larson, R. K., Iatridou, S., Lahiri, U., & Higginbotham, J., eds., Control and Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academia, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Gebauer, J. (1929). Historická mluvnice jazyka českého IV. Skladba, Prague: Česká akademie věd a umění.Google Scholar
Graščenkov, P. (2018). Grammatika prilagatel’nogo. Tipologija ad’ektivnosti i atributivnosti, Moscow: Jask.Google Scholar
Gulgowski, P. (2013). Resultative and goal phrases in Polish and English: Interaction with aspect. Questions and Answers in Linguistics, 1(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habul-Šabanović, I. (2019). Small clauses in English and Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian. Književni jezik, 30, 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, E. J. (2016). Bolgarskie konstrukcii s predikativnym opredeleniem: v poiskax prototipičeskoj modeli. Studia Slavica Hungarica, 61(2), 285–301.Google Scholar
Lomtev, T. P. (1956). Očerki po istoričeskomu sintaksisu russkogo jazyka, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Lopatina, L. E. (1966). K istorii tvoritel’nogo predikativnogo v slavjanskix jazykax. Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR, 25(6), 500–508.Google Scholar
Madariaga, N. (2006). Why Russian semi-predicative items always agree. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14(2), 45–78.Google Scholar
Madariaga, N. (2008). New Case Relations in Old and Present-Day Russian: The Role of Peripheral Core Syntactic Interactions in Grammar Change. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Marušič, F., Marvin, T., & Žaucer, R. (2003). Depictive secondary predication in Slovenian. In Browne, W., Kim, J.-Y., Partee, B., & Rothstein, R., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 11. The Amherst Meeting, 2002, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 373–392.Google Scholar
Marušič, F., Marvin, T., & Žaucer, R. (2008). Depictive secondary predication with no PRO. In Zybatow, G., Szucsich, L., Junghanns, U., & Meyer, R., eds., Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 423–434.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (1981). Predicate Nominals: A Partial Surface Syntax of Russian, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, A. (1999). Case Assignment and the Complement-Adjunct Dichotomy: A Non-configurational Constraint-Based Approach. PhD Dissertation, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Richardson, K. (2006). Case and aspect in Ukrainian depictive secondary predicates. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 28, 245–257.Google Scholar
Richardson, K. (2007). Case and Aspect in Slavic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2017). Secondary predication. In Everaert, M. & van Riemsdijk, H., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 209–233.Google Scholar
Šarić, L. (2008). Secondary predicates in Croatian. In Schroeder, C., Hentschel, G., & Boeder, W., eds., Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond, Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky, pp. 295–325.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. (2017). Depictive secondary predicates in typological perspective. In Everaert, M. & van Riemsdijk, H., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom115.Google Scholar
Silić, J. & Pranjković, I. (2005). Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika, Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. & Zaretskaya, M. (1998). Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination. Linguistics, 36, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stassen, L. (2001). Nonverbal predication in the Circum-Baltic languages. In Dahl, Ö & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., eds., Circum-Baltic Languages. Vol. 2. Grammar and Typology, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 569–590.Google Scholar
Strigin, A. & Demjjanow, A. (2001). Secondary predication in Russian. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 25, 1–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Švedova, N. J. (1952). Polnye i kratkie formy imen prilagatel’nyx v sostave skazuemogo v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jazyke. Učenyje zapiski MGU, 150, 73–132.Google Scholar
Szajbel-Keck, M. (2015). Secondary Predication in Polish. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (1986). The semantics of case in Russian predicate complements. Russian Linguistics, 10, 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Večerka, R. (1993). Altkirchenslavische (altbulgarische) Syntax II: die innere Satzstruktur [Monumenta linguae slavicae dialecti veteris. Fontes et dissertations XXXIV(XXVII–2)], Freiburg: U. W. Weiher.Google Scholar
Xodova, K. I. (1960). Značenija tvoritel’nogo bespredložnogo v staroslavjanskom jazyke. Učenye zapiski Instituta slavjanovedenija AN SSSR, 19, 101–158.Google Scholar
Žaucer, R. (2002). The Role of Verbal Prefixes in Slavic: Evidence from Slovenian Locative Denominal Verbs. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar