Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Issues
- Part II Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
- Part III The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development
- Part IV Institutional Artifacts for Value
- Part V Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
- 19 The Sociocultural Constitution of Aesthetic Transcendence
- 20 Sociocultural Science of Religion and Natural Belief
- 21 Psyche and Religio Face to Face: Religion, Psychology, and Modern Subjectivity in the Mirror
- Part VI Practices and Artifacts for Imagining Identity
- Part VII Experiences Make the Person
- General Conclusion
- Index
- References
20 - Sociocultural Science of Religion and Natural Belief
from Part V - Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Issues
- Part II Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
- Part III The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development
- Part IV Institutional Artifacts for Value
- Part V Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
- 19 The Sociocultural Constitution of Aesthetic Transcendence
- 20 Sociocultural Science of Religion and Natural Belief
- 21 Psyche and Religio Face to Face: Religion, Psychology, and Modern Subjectivity in the Mirror
- Part VI Practices and Artifacts for Imagining Identity
- Part VII Experiences Make the Person
- General Conclusion
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology , pp. 366 - 379Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Baerveldt, C. & Verheggen, T. (2012). Enactivism. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 165–190). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baerveldt, C. & Voestermans, P. (2005). Cultural psychology and the normative structure of reality. Theory and Psychology, 15, 449–473.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (trans. by McGhee, V.). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original Russian publication 1970–1979.)Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1990). Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity (trans. by Liapunov, V. & Brostrom, K.). In Holquist, M. & Liapunov, V. (Eds.), Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original Russian Publication 1979.)Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1993). Toward a Philosophy of the Act (trans. by Liapunov, V.). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original Russian publication 1986.)Google Scholar
Barrett, J. (2007). Cognitive science of religion: What is it and why is it? Religion Compass, 1(6), 768–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. (2008). Coding and quantifying counterintuitiveness in religious concepts: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 20, 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. (2012). Born Believers: The Science of Children's Religious Belief. Toronto: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113(3), 628–647.Google Scholar
Belzin, J. (2010). Towards Cultural Psychology of Religion: Principles, Approaches, Applications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bering, J. (2011). The Belief Instinct: The Psychology of Souls, Destiny, and the Meaning of Life. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Chirkov, V. (2016). Fundamentals of Research on Culture and Psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cresswell, J. (2011). Being faithful to ourselves: Bakhtin and a potential postmodern psychology of self. Culture & Psychology, 17, 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, J. (2017). Culture and the Cognitive Science of Religion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cresswell, J. & Farias, R. (2016). Cognition, culture and religion: The ontogenetic role of culture and its consequences in the study of religious experiences. Open Theology, 2(1). DOI: 10.1515/opth-2016–0009.Google Scholar
Cresswell, J. & Teucher, U. (2011). Embodiment and language: M. M. Bakhtin on ontogenetic development. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 106–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, W. & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496. DOI: 10.1126/science.1215647.Google Scholar
Guthrie, S. (2002). Animal animism: Evolutionary roots of religious cognition. In Pyysiäinen, I. & Anttonen, V. (Eds.), Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion (pp. 38–67). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hampson, P. (2005). Cultural psychology and theology: Partners in dialogue. Theology and Science, 3(4), 259–274.Google Scholar
James, W. (1996). Essays in Radical Empiricism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Jong, J., Kavanagh, C., & Visala, A. (2015). Born idolaters: The limits of the philosophical implications of the cognitive science of religion. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 57(2), 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keleman, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15(5), 296–301.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In Miller, G., Lenneberg, E., & Lenneberg, E. H. (Eds.), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition. Hingham, MA: Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. (2011). Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLean, M., Cresswell, J., & Ashley, C. (2016). Psychologists finding religion: Enhancing cognitive science of religion with cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 22(1), 44–64. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X15621482.Google Scholar
Nola, R. & Sankey, H. (2007). Theories of Scientific Method. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. (1983). Methodology in the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. & Aydede, M. (2009). A short primer on situated cognition. In Robbins, P. & Aydede, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 3–10). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slone, D. (2004). Theological Correctness: Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn't. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Teo, T. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: A critical-hermeneutic reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 18(1), 47–67.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. & Smith, L. (1996). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1993). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar