Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T15:22:53.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Sociobiology

from Part IV - Specialty Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2017

Kathleen Odell Korgen
Affiliation:
William Paterson University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
Specialty and Interdisciplinary Studies
, pp. 156 - 165
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, Patrick et al. 2011. Inclusive Fitness Theory and Eusociality. Nature 471: E1E4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barthold, J. A., Myrskylä, M., and Jones, O. R.. 2012. Childlessness Drives the Sex Difference in the Association between Income and Reproductive Success of Modern Europeans. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(6): 628638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, P. 2000. Taking the Stink Out of Instinct. In Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology. Edited by Rose, H. and Rose, S.. New York, NY: Harmony Books, 189208.Google Scholar
Beaver, Kevin M. 2008. Nonshared Environmental Influences on Adolescent Delinquent Involvement and Adult Criminal Behavior. Criminology 46(2): 341369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, Kevin M, Wright, John Paul, Delisi, Matt, and Vaughn, Michael G.. 2008. Desistance from Delinquency: The Marriage Effect Revisited and Extended. Social Science Research 37(3): 736752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bereczkei, Tamas and Csanaky, Andras. 1996. Mate Choice, Marital Success, and Reproduction in a Modern Society. Ethology and Sociobiology 17: 1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boardman, Jason D., Blalock, Casely L., and Pampel, Fred C.. 2010. Trends in the Genetic Influences on Smoking. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51(1): 108123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. 1989. Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., and Larsen, R. J.. 2001. A Half Century of Mate Preferences: The Cultural Evolution of Values. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(2): 491503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John. 1987. From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link. In The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Edited by Dupré, John. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 276306.Google Scholar
Davis, Jeff and Werre, Daniel. 2008. A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Uncertainty on Reproductive Behaviors. Human Nature 19(4): 426452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, Richard. 2009. The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2012. The Descent of Edward Wilson: A New Book on Evolution by a Great Biologist Makes a Slew of Mistakes. Prospect Magazine June. Available at www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/edward-wilson-social-conquest-earth-evolutionary-errors-origin-species, accessed November 29, 2016.Google Scholar
Eaves, Lindon J., Hatemi, Peter K., Prom-Womley, Elizabeth C., and Murrelle, Lenn. 2008. Social and Genetic Influences on Adolescent Religious Attitudes and Practices. Social Forces 86(4): 16211646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckberg, Douglas Lee. 1977. Sociobiology and the Death of Sociology: An Analytic Reply to Ellis. The American Sociologist 2(4): 191200.Google Scholar
Fieder, M. and Huber, S.. 2007. The Associations of Sex and Childlessness on the Association between Status and Reproductive Output in Modern Society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 392398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieder, M. and Huber, S.. 2012. An Evolutionary Account of Status, Power, and Career in Modern Societies. Human Nature 23: 191207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fieder, M., Huber, S., and Bookstein, F.. 2011. Socio-Economic Status, Marital Status and Childlessness in Men and Women: An Analysis of Census Data from Six Countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 43: 619635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsberg, Anna J. L. and Tullberg, Birgitta S.. 1995. The Relationship between Cumulative Number of Cohabiting Partners and Number of Children for Men and Women in Modern Sweden. Ethology and Sociobiology 16: 221232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, David. 2010. Neurosociology: The Nexus between Neuroscience and Social Psychology. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, David D. and Turner, Jonathan H.. eds. 2013. Handbook of Neurosociology. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, Joan H., Bolnick, Deborah A., Rajagopalan, Ramya, Kaufman, Jay S., Lewontin, Richard C., Duster, Troy, Ossorio, Pilar, and Marks, Jonathan. 2014. Clines without Classes: How to Make Sense of Human Variation. Sociological Theory 32: 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, A. and Koupil, I.. 2009. Social and Biological Determinants of Reproductive Success in Swedish Males and Females Born 1915–1929. Evolution and Human Behavior 30: 329341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, A. and Koupil, I.. 2010. The Association of School Performance upon Marriage and Long-term Reproductive Success in 10,000 Swedish Males and Females Born 1915–1929. Evolution and Human Behavior 31(6): 425435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, A., Koupil, I., and Lawson, D. W.. 2012. Low Fertility Increases Descendant Socioeconomic Position but Reduces Long-term Fitness in a Modern Post-Industrial Society. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 279: 43424351. Doi: 10.1098/Rspb.2012.1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Guang and Adkins, Daniel E.. 2008. How Is a Statistical Link Established between a Human Outcome and a Genetic Variant? Sociological Methods and Research 37(2): 201226.Google Scholar
Guo, Guang and Tong, Yuying. 2006. Age at First Sexual Intercourse, Genes, and Social and Demographic Context: Evidence from Twins and the Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene. Demography 43(4): 747769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Guang, Roettger, Michael, and Cai, Tianji. 2008a. The Integration of Genetic Propensities into Social Control Models of Delinquency and Violence among Male Youths. American Sociological Review 73(4): 543568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Guang, Tong, Yuying, and Cai, Tianji. 2008b. Gene by Social-Context Interactions for Number of Sexual Partners among White Male Youths: Genetics-Informed Sociology. In Special Issue: Genetics and Social Structure. Edited by Bearman, Peter. American Journal of Sociology 114(3): 3666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Guang, Elder, Glen H., Cai, Tianji, and Hamilton, Nathan. 2009. Gene-Environment Interactions: Peers’ Alcohol Use Moderates Genetic Contribution to Adolescent Drinking Behavior. Social Science Research 38(1): 213224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, Michael. 2004. The Enhancement Imperative and Group Dynamics in the Emergence of Religion and Ascriptive Inequality. Advances in Group Processes 21: 167188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J., Helm, H. W., and Cruz, N.. 2013. Mate Selection: Gender and Generational Differences. North American Journal of Psychology 15(1): 6370.Google Scholar
Heuveline, P. 2004. Reviews of Animal Traditions: Behavioural Inheritance in Evolution by Eytan Avital and Eva Jablonka. American Journal of Sociology 109: 15001506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopcroft, Rosemary L. 2006. Sex, Status and Reproductive Success in the Contemporary U.S. Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 104120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopcroft, Rosemary L. 2009. The Evolved Actor in Sociology. Sociological Theory 27(4): 390406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopcroft, Rosemary L. 2015. Sex Differences in the Relationship between Status and Number of Offspring in the Contemporary U.S. Evolution and Human Behavior 36(2): 146151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, S., Bookstein, F., and Fieder, M.. 2010. Socio-Economic Status and Reproduction in Modern Women – an Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. American Journal of Human Biology 22: 578587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Hapmap Consortium. 2003. ‘The International Hapmap Project.’ Nature 426: 789796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Hapmap Consortium. 2005. ‘A Haplotype Map of the Human Genome.’ Nature 437: 12991320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Stevi and Rees, Amanda. 2007. The Appalling Appeal of Nature: The Popular Influence of Evolutionary Psychology as a Problem for Sociology. Sociology 41(5): 917930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokela, Markus, Rotkirch, Anna, Rickard, Ian J., Pettay, Jenni, and Lummaa, Virpi. 2010. Serial Monogamy Increases Reproductive Success in Men but Not in Women. Behavioral Ecology 21: 906912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Hans-Peter, Rodgers, J. L., and Christensen, K.. 1999. Is Fertility Behavior in Our Genes? Findings from a Danish Twin Study. Population and Development Review 25(2): 253288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappegård, T. and Rønsen, M.. 2013. Socioeconomic Differences in Multipartner Fertility among Norwegian Men. Demography 50: 11351153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopreato, Joseph. 1984. Human Nature and Biocultural Evolution. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Machalek, Richard and Martin, Michael W.. 2004. Sociology and the Second Darwinian Revolution: A Metatheoretical Analysis. Sociological Theory 22(3): 455476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. 2003. The Birth of the Mind: How a Tiny Number of Genes Creates the Complexities of Human Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. 2002. A Brief History of Human Society: The Origin and Role of Emotion in Social Life. American Sociological Review 67: 129.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. 2004. Segregation and Stratification: A Biosocial Perspective. Du Bois Review 1(1): 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. 2005. Strangers in a Strange Land: Humans in an Urbanizing World. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. and Pollet, T. V.. 2008. Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans. The American Naturalist 172: 658666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisén, J., Martikainen, P., Kaprio, J., and Silventoinen, K.. 2013. Educational Differences in Completed Fertility: A Behavioral Genetic Study of Finnish Male and Female Twins. Demography 50: 13991420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, François. 2006. Achievement and Ascription in Educational Attainment: Genetic and Environmental Influences on Adolescent Schooling. Social Forces 85(1): 193216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérusse, Daniel. 1993. Cultural and Reproductive Success in Industrial Societies: Testing the Relationship at the Proximate and Ultimate Levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 267322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadagno, Jill S. 1979. Paradigms in Evolutionary Theory: The Sociobiological Model of Natural Selection. American Sociological Review 44(1): 100109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Dawn T., Rogalin, Christabel L., and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 2004. Physiological Measures of Theoretical Concepts: Some Ideas for Linking Deflection and Emotion to Physical Responses during Interaction. Advances in Group Processes 21: 77115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H. 2000a. Colonizing the Social Sciences? In Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology. Edited by Rose, H. and Rose, S.. New York, NY: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
Rose, H. 2000b. Escaping Evolutionary Psychology. In Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology. Edited by Rose, H. and Rose, S.. New York, NY: Harmony Books, 299320.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, Ullica Christina Olofsdotter. 2000. Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shanahan, Michael J., Vaisey, Stephen, Erickson, Lance D., and Smolen, Andrew. 2008. Environmental Contingencies and Genetic Propensities: Social Capital, Educational Continuation, and Dopamine Receptor Gene DRD2. In Special Issue: Genetics and Social Structure Edited by Peter Bearman. American Journal of Sociology 114(3): S260S286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneiberg, M. and Clemens, E. S.. 2006. The Typical Tools for the Job: Research Strategies in Institutional Analysis. Sociological Theory 24: 195227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jan E. and Asencio, Emily K.. 2008. Consistency and Enhancement Processes in Understanding Emotions. Social Forces 86(3): 10551078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Houten, Warren D. 2005. Primary Emotions and Social Relations: A First Report. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology 33(2): 7992.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. 2007. Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. and Maryanski, Alexandra. 2008. On the Origins of Societies by Natural Selection. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. and Stets, Jan E.. 2006. Sociological Theories of Human Emotions. Annual Review of Sociology 32: 2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udry, J. Richard. 2000. Biological Limits of Gender Construction. American Sociological Review 65(3): 443457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Berghe, Pierre L. 1974. Bringing Beasts Back in: Toward a Biosocial Theory of Aggression. American Sociological Review 39(6): 777788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, Michael G., Delisi, Matt, Beaver, Kevin M., and Wright, John Paul. 2009. DAT1 and 5HTT are Associated with Pathological Criminal Behavior in a Nationally Representative Sample of Youth.Criminal Justice and Behavior 36(11): 11031114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vining, D. R. 1986. Social versus Reproductive Success: The Central Theoretical Problem of Human Sociobiology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9(1): 167187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeden, Jason, Abrams, Michael J., Green, Melancie C., and Sabini, John. 2006. Do High-Status People Really Have Fewer Children? Human Nature 17(4): 377392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiederman, M. W. and Allgeier, E. R.. 1992. Gender Differences in Mate Selection Criteria: Sociobiological or Socioeconomic Explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology 13: 115124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1980[1975]. Sociobiology. The Abridged Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×