Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:25:02.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Psycholinguistic Approaches to Hispanic Linguistics

from Part I - Theories and Approaches to Spanish Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2018

By
Tania Leal  and
Christine Shea
Edited by
Kimberly L. Geeslin
Kimberly L. Geeslin
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics , pp. 95 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, G. T. and Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental Interpretation at Verbs: Restricting the Domain of Subsequent Reference. Cognition, 73 (3), 247–264.Google Scholar
Altmann, G. and Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with Context during Human Sentence Processing. Cognition, 30 (3), 191–238.Google Scholar
Arai, M. and Keller, F. (2013). The Use of Verb-Specific Information for Prediction in Sentence Processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (4), 525–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., and Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for Mind and Brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16 (4), 240–250.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M. and Duñabeitia, J. A. (2012). Reading Words and Sentences in Spanish. In Hualde, José Ignacio, Olarrea, Antxon, and O’Rourke, Erin (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. New York: Blackwell, pp. 803–818.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Perea, M., and Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of the Orthographic Neighborhood in Visual Word Recognition: Cross-Task Comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23 (4), 857–871.Google Scholar
Casaponsa, A., Carreiras, M., and Duñabeitia, J. A. (2014). Discriminating Languages in Bilingual Contexts: The Impact of Orthographic Markedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 (May), 424. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00424Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (03), 181–204.Google Scholar
Colzato, L. S., Bajo, M. T., van den Wildenberg, W., Paolieri, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., La Heij, W., and Hommel, B. (2008). How Does Bilingualism Improve Executive Control? A Comparison of Active and Reactive Inhibition Mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 302–312.Google Scholar
Costa, A., La Heij, W., and Navarrete, E. (2006). The Dynamics of Bilingual Lexical Access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9 (2), 137–151.Google Scholar
Cuetos, F. and Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-Linguistic Differences in Parsing: Restrictions on the Use of the Late Closure Strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73–105.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., and Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric Mapping from Phonetic to Lexical Representations in Second-Language Listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34 (2), 269–284.Google Scholar
Dallas, A. C., DeDe, G., and Nicol, J. (2013). An Event-Related-Potential (ERP) Investigation of Filler-Gap Processing in Native and Second Language Learners. Language Learning, 63, 766–799.Google Scholar
Davies, R., Barbón, A., and Cuetos, F. (2013). Lexical and Semantic Age-of-Acquisition Effects on Word Naming in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 41 (2), 297–311.Google Scholar
Davies, S. K., Izura, C., Socas, R., and Domínguez, A. (2016). Age of Acquisition and Imageability Norms for Base and Morphologically Complex Words in English and in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 48 (1), 349–365.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. and Renaud, C. (2014). On Second Language Processing and Grammatical Development: The Parser in Second Language Acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4 (2), 131–165.Google Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., and Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic Word Pre-Activation during Language Comprehension Inferred from Electrical Brain Activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8 (8), 1117–1121.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., and Baayen, H. (2010). How Cross-Language Similarity and Task Demands Affect Cognate Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 62 (3), 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T. and van Heuven, W. J. (2002). Modeling Bilingual Word Recognition: Past, Present and Future. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5 (3), 219–224.Google Scholar
Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., Farmer, T. A., and Pylkkänen, L. (2010). Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category is Based on Form Typicality. Psychological Science, 21 (5), 629–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duñabeitia, J. A., Cholin, J., Corral, J., Perea, M., and Carreiras, M. (2010). SYLLABARIUM: An Online Application for Deriving Complete Statistics for Basque and Spanish Orthographic Syllables. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 118–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., and Carreiras, M. (2007). Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Morpheme Level? Evidence for Morpho-Orthographic Decomposition. Cognition, 105 (3), 691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A. and Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). Children like Dense Neighborhoods: Orthographic Neighborhood Density Effects In Novel Readers. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11 (1), 26–35.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E. (2004). Parsing a First Language like a Second: The Erosion of L1 Parsing Strategies in Spanish–English Bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8 (3), 355–371.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E. and Sagarra, N. (2007). The Effect of Exposure on Syntactic Parsing in Spanish–English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 101–116.Google Scholar
Dussias, P., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., and Gerfen, C. (2013). When Gender and Looking Go Hand in Hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–387.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E. and Piñar, P. (2010). Effects of Reading Span and Plausibility in the Reanalysis of wh-Gaps by Chinese–English Second Language Speakers. Second Language Research, 26 (4), 443–472.Google Scholar
Eberhard, K. M., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Sedivy, J. C., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1995). Eye Movements as a Window into Real-Time Spoken Language Comprehension in Natural Contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24 (6), 409–436.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and Development in Neural Networks: The Importance of Starting Small. Cognition, 48 (1), 71–99.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., and Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological Typicality Influences On-Line Sentence Comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103 (32), 12203–12208.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Spivey, M., Joannisse, M., and McRae, K. (2012). Individual Differences in Sentence Processing. In Sprivey, M., Joanisse, M., and McRae, K. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 353–364.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. (2003). The Misinterpretation of Noncanonical Sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. and Patson, N. D. (2007). The “Good Enough” Approach to Language Comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., and Costa, A. (2014). Can Bilinguals See it Coming? Word Anticipation in L2 Sentence Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, pp. 1461–1469.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. (1978). On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence Processing: A Tutorial Review. In Coltheart, M. (ed.), The Psychology of Reading. Attention and Performance, Vol. 12. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 559–586.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. (2013). Syntax in Sentence Processing. In van Gompel, R. P. G. (ed.), Sentence Processing. London: Psychology Press, pp. 21–50.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. and Clifton, C. (1989). Successive Cyclicity in the Grammar and the Parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4 (2), 93–126.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. and Clifton, C. Jr. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. and Rayner, K. (1982). Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14 (2), 178–210.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. R., Blumenfeld, H. K., and Marian, V. (2016). Phonotactic Constraints Are Activated across Languages in Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 702.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Forster, K. I., and Frost, R. (1997). Translation Priming with Different Scripts: Masked Priming with Cognates and Non-Cognates in Hebrew–English Bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1122–1139.Google Scholar
González-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., and Cuetos, F. (2014). Effects of the Psycholinguistic Variables on the Lexical Decision Task in Spanish: A Study with 2,765 Words. Behavior Research Methods, 46 (2), 517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. and Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language Control in Bilinguals: The Adaptive Control Hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 515–530.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The Bilingual’s Language Modes. In Nicol, J. (ed.), One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 1–22. Also in Wei, Li (ed.), The Bilingual Reader (2nd edn). London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 428–449.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., and Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical Gender in L2: A Production or a Real-Time Processing Problem? Second Language Research, 28, 191–215.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., and Shafer, A. (2017). Coreference and Discourse Coherence in L2: The Roles of Grammatical Aspect and Referential Form. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7 (2), 199–229.Google Scholar
Guasch, M., Boada, R., Ferré, P., and Sánchez-Casas, R. (2013). NIM: A Web-Based Swiss Army Knife to Select Stimuli for Psycholinguistic Studies. Behavior Research Methods, 45 (3), 765–771.Google Scholar
Gullifer, J. W., Kroll, J. F., and Dussias, P. E. (2013). When Language Switching has no Apparent Cost: Lexical Access in Sentence Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 278.Google Scholar
Heredia, R. R. and Altarriba, J. (eds.). (2013). Foundations of Bilingual Memory. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar
Hernández, M., Costa, A., Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., and Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). The Impact of Bilingualism on the Executive Control and Orienting Networks of Attention. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (3), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic Features and Reanalysis in Near-Native Processing. Second Language Research, 22 (3), 369–397.Google Scholar
Hoover, M. L. and Dwivedi, V. D. (1998). Syntactic Processing by Skilled Bilinguals. Language Learning, 48 (1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical Gender in Adult L2 Acquisition: Relations between Lexical and Syntactic Variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2014). Working Memory Effects on the L2 Processing of Ambiguous Relative Clauses. Language Acquisition, 21, 250–278.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2016). The Timing of Lexical and Syntactic Processes in Second Language Sentence Comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37 (5), 1253–1280.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. (2008). Proficiency Level and the Interaction of Lexical and Morphosyntactic Information during L2 Sentence Processing. Language Learning, 58, 875–909.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. (2012). The Processing of Subject–Object Ambiguities in Native and Near-Native Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15 (4), 721–735.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. and VanPatten, B. (2013). Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ju, M. and Luce, P. A. (2004). Falling on Sensitive Ears. Psychological Science, 15, 314–318.Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, Processing and Working Memory in a Second Language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199–225.Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (2005). The Influence of First Language on the Processing of wh-Movement in English as a Second Language. Second Language Research, 21, 121–151.Google Scholar
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A Capacity Theory of Comprehension: Individual Differences in Working Memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar
Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive Sentence Processing in L2 and L1: What is Different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4 (2), 257–282.Google Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T., and Haywood, S. L. (2003). The Time-Course of Prediction in Incremental Sentence Processing: Evidence from Anticipatory Eye Movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., and Dussias, P. E. (2004). The Comprehension of Words and Sentences in Two Languages. In Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism. Malden, MA: Wiley, pp. 169–200.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., and Valdés Kroff, J. (2012). Juggling Two Languages in One Mind: What Bilinguals Tell us about Language Processing and its Consequences for Cognition. In Ross, B. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 56. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 229–262.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. and Stewart, E. (1994). Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. and Tokowicz, N. (2005). Models of Bilingual Representation and Processing: Looking Back and to the Future. In Kroll, J. F. and de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 531–553.Google Scholar
Kroll, J., van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., and Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A Critical Review and Assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (3), 373–381.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., and Smith, N. J. (2011) A Look around at What Lies Ahead: Prediction and Predictability in Language Processing. In Bar, M. (ed.). Predictions in the Brain: Using Our Past to Generate a Future. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 190–207.Google Scholar
Leal, T., Slabakova, R., and Farmer, T. A. (2017). The Fine-Tuning of Linguistic Expectations over the Course of L2 Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39 (3), 493–525.Google Scholar
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-Based Syntactic Comprehension. Cognition, 106 (3), 1126–1177.Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C. and Fernald, A. (2010). Real-Time Processing of Gender-Marked Articles by Native and Non-Native Spanish Speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63 (4), 447–464.Google Scholar
Li, P. and Zhao, X. (2014). Connectionist Bilingual Representation. In Heredia, R. R. and Altarriba, J. (eds.), Foundations of Bilingual Memory. New York: Springer, pp. 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, J. H. and Christianson, K. (2013). Second Language Sentence Processing in Reading for Comprehension and Translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 518–537.Google Scholar
Lim, J. H. and Christianson, K. (2015). Second Language Sensitivity to Agreement Errors: Evidence from Eye Movements during Comprehension and Translation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36 (6), 1283–1315.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic Constraints and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157–201.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. and Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing Working Memory: A Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The Lexical Nature of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.Google Scholar
Macizo, P., Bajo, T., and Cruz Martín, M. (2010). Inhibitory Processes in Bilingual Language Comprehension: Evidence from Spanish–English Interlexical Homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 63 (2), 232–244.Google Scholar
Marian, V. and Spivey, M. J. (2003). Competing Activation in Bilingual Language Processing: Within- and Between-Language Competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97–115.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1975). Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process. Science, 189 (4198), 226–228.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, Competition and Frequency in Lexical Access. In Altman, G. (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 148–172.Google Scholar
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J. R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., and Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals Reading in their Second Language do not Predict Upcoming Words as Native Readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69 (4), 574–588.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L. and Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE Model of Speech Perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.Google Scholar
McRae, K. and Matsuki, K. (2013). Constraint-Based Models of Sentence Processing. In van Gompel, R. P. G. (ed.), Sentence Processing. London: Psychology Press, pp. 51–77.Google Scholar
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-Line Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38 (3), 283–312.Google Scholar
Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in Word Recognition: Experiments Causing Change in the Logogen Model. In Kolers, P., Wrolstad, M. E., and Bouma, H. (eds.), Processing of Visible Language. New York: Springer, pp. 259–268.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Carpenter, P., and Just, M. (1994). A Capacity Approach to Syntactic Comprehension Disorders: Making Normal Adults Perform like Aphasic Patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671–717.Google Scholar
Morales, J., Gómez-Ariza, C. J., and Bajo, M. T. (2013). Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Bilinguals and Monolinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 531–546.Google Scholar
Müller, O., Duñabeitia, J. A., and Carreiras, M. (2010). Orthographic and Associative Neighborhood Density Effects: What is Shared, what is Different? Psychophysiology, 47 (3), 455–466.Google Scholar
Norris, D. and McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian Model of Continuous Speech Recognition. Psychological Review, 115, 357–395.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. (1994). Processing Local and Unbounded Dependencies: A Unified Account. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23 (4), 323–352.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. and Traxler, M. J. (2003). Evidence against the Use of Subcategorisation Frequency in the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18 (4), 469–503.Google Scholar
Prior, A. and Gollan, T. (2011). Good Language Switchers Are Good Task Switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English Bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 682–691.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. (2013). Sentence Processing in Bilinguals. In van Gompel, R. P. G. (ed.), Sentence Processing. London: Psychology Press, pp. 221–246.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, G. A. (2008). Second Language Sentence Processing: Is it Fundamentally Different? (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. I. and Arêas da Luz Fontes, A. B. (2008). Cross-Language Mediated Priming: Effects of Context and Lexical Relationship. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 1–16.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. I. and Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual Lexical Activation in Sentence Context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55 (2), 197–212.Google Scholar
Sebastián Gallés, N., Carreiras, M. F., Cuetos, F., and Martí, M. A. (2000). LEXESP. Léxico informatizado del español. Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona. [CD-ROM]Google Scholar
Shook, A. and Marian, V. (2012). The Bilingual Language Interaction Network for Comprehension of Speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (2), 304–324. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000466.Google Scholar
Spivey, M. J. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Discourse: Modeling the Effects of Referential Context and Lexical Frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24 (6), 1521.Google Scholar
Staub, A. and Clifton, C. Jr (2006). Syntactic Prediction in Language Comprehension: Evidence from “either … or.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 (2), 425.Google Scholar
Steedman, M. J. (1989). Grammar, Interpretation, and Processing from the Lexicon. In Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 463–504.Google Scholar
Sunderman, G. L. and Fancher, E. (2013). Lexical Access in Bilinguals and Second Language Learners. In Schwieter, J. (ed.), Innovative Research and Practices in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 267–286.Google Scholar
Tabor, W. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1999). Dynamical Models of Sentence Processing. Cognitive Science, 23 (4), 491–515.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., and Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension. Science, 268 (5217), 1632.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K. and Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence Comprehension. In Miller, J. L. and Eimas, P. D. (eds.), Speech, Language, and Communication. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 217–262.Google Scholar
Townsend, D. J., and Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Gompel, R. P. G. (2013). Sentence Processing: An Introduction. In van Gompel, R. P. G. (ed.), Sentence Processing. London: Psychology Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., and Traxler, M. J. (2000). Unrestricted Race: A New Model of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. In Kennedy, A., Radach, R., Heller, D., and Pynte, J. (eds.), Reading as a Perceptual Process. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 621–648.Google Scholar
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., and Traxler, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 45 (2), 225–258.Google Scholar
van Hell, J. G. and Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign Language Knowledge can Influence Native Language Performance in Exclusively Native Contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9 (4), 780–789.Google Scholar
van Kesteren, R., Dijkstra, T., and de Smedt, K. (2012). Markedness Effects in Norwegian–English Bilinguals: Task-Dependent Use of Language-Specific Letters and Bigrams. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 65 (11), 2129–2154. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.679946Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S. and Rodríguez, E. (2005). Neighbourhood Density Effects in Spoken Word Recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3, 64–73.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., Stamer, M. K., and Kieweg, D. (2012). The Beginning Spanish Lexicon: A Web-Based Interface to Calculate Phonological Similarity among Spanish Words in Adults Learning Spanish as a Foreign Language. Second Language Research, 28 (1), 103–112. doi:10.1177/0267658311432199Google Scholar
Weber, A. and Scharenborg, O. (2012). Models of Spoken-Word Recognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3, 387–401. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1178.Google Scholar
Wicha, N. Y., Moreno, E. M., and Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating Words and their Gender: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 (7), 1272–1288.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×