Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:32:01.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Stakeholder Value Equilibration and the Entrepreneurial Process

from Part III - Stakeholder Theory in the Business Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2019

Jeffrey S. Harrison
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
Jay B. Barney
Affiliation:
University of Utah
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Robert A. Phillips
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1‐2): 1126.Google Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., McBride, R., & Wuebker, R. (2017). On opportunities: Philosophical and empirical implications. Academy of Management Review, 42(4): 726730.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1974). Limited knowledge and economic analysis. The American Economic Review, 64(1): 110.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., Kamien, M., Olson, M., Sexton, D., Simon, H., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). Report on the seminar on research perspectives in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1): 157.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 1): 893921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchers, D., & Vitikainen, A. (2012). On exit: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the right of exit in liberal multicultural societies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, R. (1983). History: The human gamble. London: Institute of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1995). Stakeholder thinking in three models of management morality: a perspective with strategic implications. In Nasi, J., eds., Understanding stakeholder thinking, pp. 4774. Helsinki: LSR-Publications.Google Scholar
Clinard, M. B. (1983). Corporate ethics and crime: The role of middle management. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386405.Google Scholar
Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5): 674695.Google Scholar
Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. (2004). Dispersed knowledge and an entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of business venturing, 19(5): 659679.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1): 6591.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2017). Entrepreneurial discovery or creation? In search of the middle ground. Academy of Management Review, 42(4): 733736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1997). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In Beauchamp, T. L. & Bowie, N. E., eds., Ethical Theory and Business, pp. 144146 Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of behavioral economics, 19(4): 337359.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, , & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. Darden Business School Working Paper No. 01-02. University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.” Organization science, 15(3): 364369.Google Scholar
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1): 121.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review: 519530.Google Scholar
Henriques, A., & Richardson, J. (2013). The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 131154.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1): 3359.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404437.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1): 6085.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C. (2003). The liberal archipelago: A theory of diversity and freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19(1): 5189.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853886.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L. & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3): 403441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. A. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 5166.Google Scholar
Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. W. (2016). A realist perspective of entrepreneurship: Opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review, 41(3): 410434.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sautet, F. E., & Foss, N. J. (1999). The organization of large, complex firms: An Austrian view. Unpublished working paper presented at the Austrian Economics Seminar at New York University and at Peter Boettke’s Seminar George Mason University.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 3rd edn. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought.Google Scholar
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217226.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3(1): 119138.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., & Forster, W. R. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37(1): 2133.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. (1991). Adam Smith and his legacy for modern capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3): 229267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×