Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction: What is Strategy as Practice?
- PART I ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL QUESTIONS
- PART II THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS
- 7 Giddens, structuration theory and Strategy as Practice
- 8 An activity-theory approach to Strategy as Practice
- 9 A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing
- 10 A Wittgensteinian perspective on strategizing
- 11 A Foucauldian perspective on strategic practice: strategy as the art of (un)folding
- 12 A narrative approach to Strategy as Practice: strategy making from texts and narratives
- PART III METHODOLOGICAL TRACKS
- PART IV APPLICATION VARIATIONS
- Author Index
- Index
- References
8 - An activity-theory approach to Strategy as Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction: What is Strategy as Practice?
- PART I ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL QUESTIONS
- PART II THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS
- 7 Giddens, structuration theory and Strategy as Practice
- 8 An activity-theory approach to Strategy as Practice
- 9 A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing
- 10 A Wittgensteinian perspective on strategizing
- 11 A Foucauldian perspective on strategic practice: strategy as the art of (un)folding
- 12 A narrative approach to Strategy as Practice: strategy making from texts and narratives
- PART III METHODOLOGICAL TRACKS
- PART IV APPLICATION VARIATIONS
- Author Index
- Index
- References
Summary
An activity-theory approach to Strategy as Practice
This chapter introduces activity theory as an approach for studying Strategy as Practice. Activity theory conceptualizes the ongoing construction of activity as a product of activity systems, comprising the actor, the community with which that actor interacts and those symbolic and material tools that mediate between actors, their community and their pursuit of activity. Activity theory has its roots in Russian social psychology. Russian cultural historical activity theory, as developed by Vygotsky (1978), initially conceptualized early childhood development through children's interaction in activities with their community. His followers, particularly Leontiev (1978), developed this theory more widely to encompass the interaction between the individual and the collective in the pursuit of activity. Activity theory has been widely adopted within the fields of education and human–computer interaction (Kaptelinin and Nardi 2006), as well as being developed in a particular way by Engeström (1990) for examining work practices in a range of contexts. More recently it has been used within organization theory to examine organizational and strategy practice (e.g. Blackler 1993, 1995; Blackler et al. 2000; Groleau 2006; Jarzabkowski 2003, 2005). Activity theory provides a resource for analysing the interaction between practitioners, practices and praxis through the study of activity systems.
In this chapter, I shall explain some specific concepts associated with activity theory and indicate its value for studying Strategy as Practice as it is socially accomplished by individuals in interaction with their wider social group and the artefacts of interaction.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 127 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
2005. The Evolving Object of Software Development. Organization, 12.3: 401–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982. Morphogenesis Versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action. British Journal of Sociology 33.4: 455–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1997. Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution. Organization Studies, 18.1: 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Knowledge and the Theory of Organizations: Organizations as Activity Systems and the Reframing of Management. Journal of Management Studies, 30.6: 863–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies, 16.6: 1021–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. Managing Experts and Competing Through Collaboration: An Activity Theoretical Analysis. Organization, 6.1: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2000. Organizing Processes in Complex Activity Networks. Organization, 7.2: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2009. Intentionality, Agency, Change: Practice Theory and Management. Management Learning, 40.2: 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. Practical Reason and Cultural Constraint: Agency in Bourdieu's Theory of practice. In (ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 128–152.Google Scholar
1983. Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management: Insights From a Process Study. Management Science, 29.12: 1349–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. A Process Model of Strategic Business Exit: Implications for an Evolutionary Perspective on Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17/Summer Special Issue: 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds), 1999. Activity Theory and Social Practice. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
and 2007. Strategy as Practical Coping: A Heideggerian Perspective. Organization Studies, 27.5: 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. Post-Processual Challenges for the Emerging Strategy as Practice perspective: Discovering Strategy in the Logic of Practice. Human Relations, 60.1: 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2007. Strategizing in Pluralistic Contexts: Rethinking Theoretical Frames. Human Relations, 60.1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. On the Dialectics of Strategic Alliances. Organization Science, 15, 1: 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
1990. Learning, Working and Imagining: Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
1993. Developmental Studies of Work as a Testbench of Activity Theory: The Case of Primary Care Medical Practice. In and (eds), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64–103.Google Scholar
2002. Pursuing an Evolving Object: A Case Study in Object Formation and Identification. Mind, Culture and Activity, 9.2: 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Vygotsky and Cognitive Science: Language and the Unification of the Social and Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. One Phenomenon, Two Lenses: Understanding Collective Action from the Perspective of Coorientation and Activity Theories. In F. and (eds), Communication as Organizing. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 157–180.Google Scholar
2000. Putting Strategy into Practice: Top Management Teams in Action in Three UK Universities. PhD thesis, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick.
2003. Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change. Journal of Management Studies, 40.1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation and Practices-in-se. Organization Studies, 25.4: 529–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Shaping Strategy as a Structuration Process. Academy of Management Journal, 51.4: 621–650.Google Scholar
and 2009. The Practice and Process of Delivering Integration through Strategic Planning. Journal of Management Studies, 46.8: 1255–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, . and 2007. Strategizing: The Challenges of a Practice Perspective. Human Relations, 60.1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. Strategizing and Organizing in Pluralistic Contexts. Long Range Planning, 39.6: 631–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2009. Doing Which Work? A Practice Approach to Institutional Pluralism. In , and (eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284–316.Google Scholar
and 2007. A Rhetoric-in-Context Approach to Building Commitment to Multiple Strategic Goals. Organization Studies, 28.11: 1639–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2009. Strategy as Practice: A Review and Future Directions for the Field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11.1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2007. Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2003. Micro Strategy and Strategizing: Towards an Activity-Based View?Journal of Management Studies, 40.1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999. Vygotsky's Psychology: A Biography of Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
, and 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1964. Social Integration and System Integration. In and (eds.). Explorations in Social Change. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 244–257.Google Scholar
2008. Facilitating Organizational Change: The Use of Activity Theory as a Framework for Social Construction of Strategy Knowledge. Unpublished PhD thesis, Indiana University.
2005. Strategic Practices as Enablers and Disablers of Championing Activity. Strategic Organization, 3.2: 157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Role Expectations and Middle Managers Strategic Agency. Journal of Management Studies, 45.2: 294–316.Google Scholar
and 2008. On the Problem of Participation in Strategy: A Critical Discursive Perspective. Organization Science, 19: 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. Epistemic Objects, Artifacts and Organizational Change. Organization, 12.3: 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Studying Context: A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Models, and Distributed Cognition. In (ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 69–102.Google Scholar
and 2004. Coordination and Collaboration Activities in Cooperative Information Systems. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13.1: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributive Organizing, Organization Science, 13.3: 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. Theory in Anthropology Since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26.1 126–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. A Theory of Organizing Informed by Activity Theory: The Locus of Paradox, Sources of Change, and Challenge to Management. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19.4: 471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. Instrument Mediated Activity: From Subject Development to Anthropocentric Design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6.5: 429–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
1995. Organizations are Activity Systems, not Merely Systems of Thought. Advances in Strategic Management, 11: 151–172.Google Scholar
, and 2004. Strategies as Discursive Constructions: The Case of Airline Alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41.1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2004. Activity Systems and Conflict Resolution in an Online Professional Communication Course. Business Communication Quarterly, 67.2: 182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. Vygotsky and the Social Formation of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2003. The Work of Strategizing and Organizing: For a Practice Perspective. Strategic Organization, 1.1: 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research. Organization Studies, 27.5: 613–634.CrossRef
- 12
- Cited by