Adams, T. (2008). Kia receives 43,000 applications for West Point auto plant. Columbus Ledger-Enquirer. Retrieved from www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/local/article28988608.html.Google Scholar

Aguinas, H., Henle, C. A., & Jr. Beaty, J. C. (2001). Virtual reality technology: A new tool for personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alavi, M., Marakas, G. M., & Yoo, Y. (2002). A comparative study of distributed learning environments on learning outcomes. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 404–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alkhadher, O., Anderson, N., & Clarke, D. (1994). Computer-based testing: A review of recent developments in research and practice. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 4(2), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, D. G., Biggane, J. E., Pitts, M., Otondo, R., & Van Scotter, J. (2013). Reactions to recruitment web sites: Visual and verbal attention, attraction, and intentions to pursue employment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(3), 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, D. G., Mahto, R. V., & Otondo, R. F. (2007). Web-based recruitment: Effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes towards website on applicant attraction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1696–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett Jr., W., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, N. (2003). Applicant and recruiter reactions to new technology in selection: A critical review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2–3), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). Is there optimal design for on-line MBA courses? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). System, scholar or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbaugh, J. B. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2007). The importance of participant interaction in online environments. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), 853–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbaugh, J. B. & Hornik, S. (2006). Do Chickering and Gamson’s seven principles also apply to online MBAs. The Journal of Educators Online, 3(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbaugh, J. B. & Rau, B. L. (2007). A study of disciplinary, structural, and behavioral effects on course outcomes in online MBA courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astor, M. (2017). Microchip implants for employees? One company says yes. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2017/07/25/technology/microchips-wisconsin-company-employees.html.Google Scholar

Baker, W. H., DeTienne, K., & Smart, K. L. (1998). How Fortune 500 companies are using electronic resume management systems. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(3), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, A. E., Dunham, R. B., & Formisano, R. A. (1992). The impact of flexible benefits on employee satisfaction: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 45(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baturay, M. H. (2011). Relationships among sense of classroom community, perceived cognitive learning and satisfaction of students at an e-learning course. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Paronto, M. E., Weekley, J. A., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Applicant reactions to different selection technology: Face-to-face, interactive voice response, and computer-assisted telephone screening interviews. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 296–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boese, S. (May 6, 2015). The engagement solution. Human Resource Executive.Google Scholar

Brasil, I. S., Neto, F. M. M., Chagas, J. F. S., de Lima, R. M., Souza, D. F. L., Bonates, M. F., & Dantas, A. (2011). An intelligent agent-based virtual game for oil drilling operators training. Paper presented at the Virtual Reality (SVR), 2011 XIII Symposium on, Uberlandia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breaugh, J. A. & Starke, M. (2000). Research on employee recruitment: So many studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of Management, 26(3), 405–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, S. & McDonnell, S. (2003). IHRIM Go-To-Guides: e-compensation. The e-merging technology series. Burlington, MA: IHRIM.Google Scholar

Brown, K. G., Howardson, G., & Fisher, S. L. (2016). Learner control and e-learning: Taking stock and moving forward. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L. M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, T. & Smith, J. L. (1999). Research on the internet: Validation of a World-Wide Web mediated personality scale. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. & Computers, 31(4), 565–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cappelli, P. (July/August 2015). Can Machines Ponder HR? Human Resource Executive, p. 5.Google Scholar

Carolan, T. F., Hutchins, S. D., Wickens, C. D., & Cumming, J. M. (2014). Costs and benefits of more learner freedom: Meta-analyses of exploratory and learner control training methods. Human Factors, 56, 999–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carswell, A. D. & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance education environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cascio, W. F. (2016). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits (10th edn.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

CBS News. (2017). The Data Brokers: Selling Your Personal Information. Retrieved from www.cbsnews.com/news/the-data-brokers-selling-your-personal-information/.Google Scholar

Cedar. (1999). 1999 Human Resources Self-Service Survey. Baltimore, MD: Cedar.Google Scholar

CedarCrestone. (2010). CedarCrestone 2009–2010 HR Systems Survey. Retrieved from www.cedarcrestone.com/research.php.Google Scholar

Cennamo, L. & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, D. S. & Godollei, A. (2017). E-Recruiting: Using technology to attract job applicants. In Hertel, G., Stone, D. L., Johnson, R. D., & Passmore, J. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of the internet at work (pp. 213–230). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 928–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., & Webster, J. (2003). Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: A field of investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 944–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, D. S. & Webster, J. (2003). The use of technologies in the recruiting, screening, and selection processes for job candidates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chuah, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Personality assessment: Does the medium matter?. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cober, R. T., Brown, D. J., Blumental, A. J., Doverspike, D., & Levy, P. (2000). The quest for the qualified job surfer: It’s time the public sector catches the wave. Public Personnel Management, 29(4), 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cober, R. T., Brown, D. J., Levy, P. E., Keeping, L. M., & Cober, A. L. (2003). Organizational web sites: Web site content and style as determinants of organizational attraction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coyne, I., Warszta, T., Beadle, S., & Sheehan, N. (2005). The impact of mode of administration on the equivalence of a test battery: A quasi-experimental design. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 220–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronk, B. C. & West, J. L. (2002). Personality research on the internet: A comparison of web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davenport, T. & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world: Don’t start with moon shots. Harvard Business Review (January-February), 108–116.Google Scholar

deNoyelles, A., Hornik, S. R., & Johnson, R. D. (2014). Exploring the Dimensions of Self-Efficacy in Virtual World Learning: Environment, Task, and Content. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10, 255–271.Google Scholar

DeRouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., & Salas, E. (2004). Optimizing e‐learning: Research‐based guidelines for learner‐controlled training. Human Resource Management, 43(2–3), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dineen, B. R., Ash, S. R., & Noe, R. A. (2002). A web of applicant attraction: Person-organization fit in the context of web-based recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 723–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dineen, B. R. & Noe, R. A. (2009). Effects of customization on application decisions and applicant pool characteristics in a web-based recruitment context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, L. (2017). This Firm Uses Virtual Reality to Recruit. Should Others Follow? Retrieved from www.talenteconomy.io/2017/03/13/firm-uses-virtual-reality-recruit-others-follow/.Google Scholar

Dominguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernandez-Sanz, L., Pages, C., & Martinez-Herraiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drasgow, F. (1984). Scrutinizing psychological tests: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 134–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulebohn, J. H. (2003). Information technology implementation: The need for compensation system congruency. In Stone, D. L. (Eds.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (vol. 3, pp. 153–186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulebohn, J. H. & Johnson, R. D. (2013). Human resource metrics and decision support: A classification framework. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eaton, C., Deutsch, T., Deroos, D., Lapis, G., & Zikopoulos, P. (2012). Understanding big data: Analytics for enterprise class hadoop and streaming data. San Francisco, CA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Eddy, E. R., Stone, D. L., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1999). The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 52(2), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, L. (2016). How gaming is helping organizations accelerate recruitment. Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/louisefron/2016/06/12/how-gaming-is-helping-organizations-accelerate-recruitment/.Google Scholar

Fallaw, S. S., Solomonson, A. L., & McClelland, L. (2009). Current trends in assessment use: A multi-organizational survey. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industriall and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Fetzer, M. (2015). Serious games for talent selection and development. TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 52(3), 117–125.Google Scholar

Fisher, S. L., Howardson, G., Wasserman, M., & Orvis, K. (forthcoming). How do learners interact with elearning? Examining patterns of learner control behaviors. AIS Transactions on Human Computer Interaction, 9(2), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, S. L., Wasserman, M., & Orvis, K. (2010). Trainee reactions to learner control: An important link in the e-learning equation. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(3), 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleck, C. (2016). An algorithm for success. HR Magazine (June), 130–135.Google Scholar

Flood, J. (2002). Read all about it: On-line learning facing 80 percent attrition rates. Turkish Journal Online of Distance Education, 3(2).Google Scholar

Foster, J. A., Sheridan, P. K., Irish, R., & Frost, G. S. (2012). Gamification as a strategy for promoting deeper investigation in a reverse engineering activity. Paper presented at the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furtmüller, E., Wilderom, C., & Van Dick, R. (2010). Sustainable e-Recruiting portals: How to motivate applicants to stay connected throughout their careers? International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 6(3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanaki, E. (2002). The decision to recruit online: A descriptive study. Career Development International, 7, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrison, D. R. & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gartner. (2015). Gartner Reveals Top Predictions for IT Organizations and Users for 2016 and Beyond. Retrieved from www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3143718.Google Scholar

Gherson, D. & Jackson, A. P. (2000). Web-based compensation planning. In Walker, A. J. (Ed.), Web-based human resources (pp. 83–95). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gill, M. (2000). E-learning technology and strategy for organisations. In Fry, K. (Ed.), The Business of e-learning: Bringing your Organization in the Knowledge Economy. Sydney, Australia University of Technology.Google Scholar

Granger, B. & Levine, E. (2010). The perplexing role of learner control in e-learning: Will learning and the transfer benefit suffer? International Journal of Training and Development, 14(3), 180–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gueutal, H. G. & Falbe, C. M. (2005). eHR: Trends in delivery methods. In Gueutal, H. G. & Stone, D. L. (Eds.), The brave new world of eHR: Human resources management in the digital age (pp. 190–225). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gueutal, H. G. & Stone, D. L. (2005). The brave new world of eHR:Human resources management in the digital age. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gunawardena, C. N. & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutek, B. A. (1995). The dynamics of service: Reflections on the changing nature of customer/provider interactions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gutek, B. A., Bhappu, A. D., Liao-Troth, M. A., & Cherry, B. (1999). Distinguishing between service relationships and encounters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 218–233baker.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, B. & LeCavalier, J. (2000). E-learning across the enterprise: The benchmarking study of best practices. Retrieved from www.brandon-hall.com/elacenbenstu.html.Google Scholar

Harris, M. M., Van Hoye, G., & Lievens, F. (2003). Privacy and attitudes towards internet-based selection systems: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2/3), 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, T. L. & Stone, D. L. (2015). Understanding an e-recruiting method: Aligning website features and applicants’ values. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Vancouver, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawking, P., Stein, A., & Foster, S. (2004). E-HR and employee self service: A case study of a Victorian public sector organisation. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 1019–1026.Google Scholar

Hays, R. T., Jacobs, J. W., Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1992). Flight simulator training effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Military Psychology, 4(2), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3(1), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornik, S. & Thornburg, S. (2010). Really engaging accounting: Second Life™ as a learning platform. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(3), 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, J.-H., Jin, B.-H., & Yang, C. (2004). Satisfaction with business-to-employee benefit ssytems and organiational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Manpower, 25(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, J.-H., Yang, C., Jin, B.-H., & Chiu, H. (2004). Measuring satisfaction with business-to-employee systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, M. G., Day, E. A., Wang, X., Schuelke, M. J., Arsenault, M. L., Harkrider, L. N., & Cooper, O. D. (2013). Learner-controlled practice difficulty in the training of a complex task: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 80–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inayat, I., Amin, R., Inayat, Z., & Salim, S. S. (2013). Effects of collaborative web based vocational education and training (VET) on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 68, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, S. E. & Schuler, R. S. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual review of psychology, 46(1), 237–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, R. D. & Brown, K. G. (2017). e-Learning. In Hertel, G., Stone, D. L., Johnson, R. D., & Passmore, J. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of the internet at work. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. D. & Gueutal, H. G. (2012). Transforming HR through technology: The use of eHR and human resource information system in organisations. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/about/foundation/products/Documents/HR%20Tech%20EPG-%20Final.pdfGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. D., Gueutal, H. G., & Falbe, C. M. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e-learning effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. D., Hornik, S., & Salas, E. (2008). An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(5), 356–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. D., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Stone, D. L. (2016). The evolution of the field of human resource information systems: Co-evolution of technology and HR processes. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 38, 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. D., Marakas, G. M., & Palmer, J. W. (2006). Differential social attributions toward computing technology: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64(5), 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. D., Marakas, G. M., & Palmer, J. W. (2008). Beliefs about the social role and capabilities of computing technology: Development of the computing technology continuum of perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(2), 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. D., Stone, D. L., & Navas, D. S. (2011). Factors Related to the Digital Divide and Hispanics’ Use of Computers. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. D., Thatcher, J. B., & Burleson, J. (2016). A framework and research agenda for studying eHRM: Automating and informating capabilities of HR technology. In Stone, D. L. & Dulebohn, J. H. (Eds.), Research in human resource management: Human resource management theory and research on new employment relationships (pp. 225-253). Charlotte, NC: Information Ag.Google Scholar

Karim, M. N. & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Reexamining the nature of learner control: Dimensionality and effects on learning and training reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, M. J. & Johnson, R. D. (2018). Human resource information systems: Basics, applications, and future directions (4th edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Kehoe, J. F., Dickter, D. N., Russell, D. P., & Sacco, J. M. (2005). E-selection. In Gueutal, H. G. & Stone, D. L. (Eds.), The brave new world of e HR: Human resource management in the digitalaAge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Keith, N. & Frese, M. (2005). Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraichy, D. & Chapman, D. S. (2014). Tailoring web-based recruiting messages: Individual differences in the persuasiveness of affective and cognitive messages. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraiger, K. & Jerden, E. (2007). A meta-analytic investigation of learner control: Old findings and new directions. In Fiore, S. M. & Salas, E. (Eds.), Toward a science of distributed learning (pp. 65–90). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsen, C. R., Oestergaard, J., Ottesen, B. S., & Soerensen, J. L. (2012). The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized trials. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 91(9), 1015–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lim, C. K. (2001). Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, L. K., Dubois, C., & Faley, R. (2009). A case study analysis of factors that influence attrition rates in voluntary online training programs. International Journal of E-learning, 8(3), 347–359.Google Scholar

Lukaszewski, K. M., Stone, D. L., & Johnson, R. D. (2016). Impact of human resource information system policies on privacy. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(2), 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makransky, G. & Glas, C. A. (2011). Unproctored internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, M. L. & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, C. L. & Nagao, D. H. (1989). Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauldin, E. G. (2003). An experimental examination of information technology and compensation structure complementarities in an expert system context. Journal of Information Systems Research, 17, 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maurath, D. (2014). A critical incident for big data. TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 51(3), 16–25.Google Scholar

McDaniel, R., Lindgren, R., & Friskics, J. (2012). Using badges for shaping interactions in online learning environments. Paper presented at the 2012 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Orlando, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, M. A. & Ferguson, M. W. (2003). Biodata, personality, and demographic differences of recruits from threes sources. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mennecke, B. E., Hassall, L. M., & Triplett, J. (2008). The mean business of Second Life: Teaching entrepreneurship, technology and e-commerce in immersive environments. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 339–348.Google Scholar

Mennecke, B. E., Triplett, J. L., Hassall, L. M., Conde, Z. J., & Heer, R. (2011). An examination of a theory of embodied social presence in virtual worlds. Decision Sciences, 42(2), 413–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O., Cifuentes, L., & Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mohamed, A. A., Orife, J. N., & Wibowo, K. (2002). The legality of key word search as a personnel selection tool. Employee Relations, 24, 516–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mooney, A. (May 15, 2017). US faces crisis as pension funding hole hits $3.85tn. Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/f2891b34-3705-11e7-99bd-13beb0903fa3.Google Scholar

Mujber, T. S., Szecsi, T., & Hashimi, M. S. (2004). Virtual reality applications in manufacturing process simulation. Journal of materials processing technology, 155, 1834–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mullich, J. (2004). A second act for e-learning. Workforce Management, 83, 51–55.Google Scholar

Nguyen, H. H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 645–662.Google Scholar

Nikolaou, I. (2014). Social networking web sites in job search and employee recruiting. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Organ, D. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orvis, K. A., Brusso, R. C., Wasserman, M. E., & Fisher, S. L. (2010). E-nabled for e-learning? The moderating role of personality in determining the optimal degree of learner control in an e-learning environment. Human Performance, 24(1), 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orvis, K. A., Fisher, S. L., & Wasserman, M. E. (2009). Power to the people: Using learner control to improve trainee reactions and learning in web-based instructional environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 960–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oswald, F. L., Carr, J. Z., & Schmidt, A. M. (2001). The medium and the message: Dual effects of supervision and web-based testing on measurement equivalence for ability and personality measures. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychoogy Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Overton, R. C., Harms, H. J., Taylor, L. R., & Zickar, M. J. (1997). Adapting to adaptive testing. Personnel Psychology, 50, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panepinto, R. (1995). Voice technology for 401(k) plans. Benefits Quarterly, 11, 8–11.Google Scholar

Pew Internet. (2017). Minorities use of the internet and broadband. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/.Google Scholar

Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., Holtz, B. C., & Kemp, C. (2003). Web‐based and paper‐and‐pencil testing of applicants in a proctored setting: Are personality, biodata, and situational judgment tests comparable? Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 733–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potosky, D., & Bobko, P. (2004). Selection testing via the internet: Practical considerations and exploratory empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 57, 1003–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robson, K., Plangger, K., Kietzman, J. H., McCarthy, I., & Pitt, L. (2015). Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Business Horizons, 588(4), 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbloom, J. S., & Hallman, G. V. (1991). Employee benefit planning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Rynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd edn., vol. 2, pp. 399–444). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar

Salas, E., DeRouin, R., & Littrell, L. (2005). Research-based guidelines for designing distance learning: What we know so far. In Guetal, H. G. & Stone, D. L. (Eds.), The brave new world of eHr (pp. 104–137. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. & Moscoso, S. (2003). Internet-based personality testing: Equivalence of measures and assesses’ perceptions and reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheu, C., Ryan, A. M., & Nona, F. (1999). Company web sites as a recruiting mechanism: What influences applicant impressions. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. M. & Ford, J. K. (2003). Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56, 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, J. A., Chapman, D. S., & Jones, D. A. (2015). Does emphasizing different types of person–environment fit in online job ads influence application behavior and applicant quality? Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, R. H. (2002). Organizational justice in e-recruiting: Issues and controversies. Surveillance & society, 1(2), 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selden, S. & Orenstein, J. (2011). Government E‐Recruiting Web Sites: The influence of e‐recruitment content and usability on recruiting and hiring outcomes in US state governments. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sierra-Cedar. (2016). Sierra-Cedar 2015–2016 HRSystems Survey: 18th Annual Edition. Alpharetta, GA: SierraCedar.Google Scholar

Silvester, J., Anderson, N., Haddleton, E., Cunningham-Snell, N., & Gibb, A. (2000). A cross-modal comparison of telephone and face-to-face selection interviews in graduate recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(1), 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinar, E. F. & Reynolds, D. H. (2001). Applicant reactions to internet-based selection techniques. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Sitzmann, T., Brown, K. G., Casper, W. J., Ely, K., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2008). A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 280–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sitzmann, T. & Ely, K. (2010). Sometimes you need a reminder: The effects of self-regulation on regulatory processes, learning and attrition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 623–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, T. L. (1996). Using computer technology to enhance learning: Compensation in the real world. Journal of Education for Business, 72(2), 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, E. & Hartig, J. R. (2013). Gamification of board review: A residency curricular innovation. Medical Education, 47(5), 524–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Society for Human Resource Management. (2002). The future of the HR profession: Eight leading consulting firms share their visions for the future of human resources. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/pressroom/Documents/future_of_hr.pdf.Google Scholar

Society for Human Resource Management. (2007). SHRM case study: Manager self-service. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/technology/Articles/Pages/CMS_006604.Google Scholar

Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stone, D. L., Deadrick, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Johnson, R. D. (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 216–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, D. L., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Emerging issues in theory and research on electronic human resource management (eHRM). Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, D. L., Johnson, R. D., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Hartman, M. (2006). A comparative study of Hispanic-American and Anglo-American cultural values and job choice preferences. Management Research, 4, 7–22.Google Scholar

Stone, D. L., Krueger, D., & Takach, S. (2017). Social issues associated with the internet at work. In Hertel, G., Stone, D. L., Johnson, R. D., & Passmore, J. (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of the Internet at Work (pp. 423–448). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stone, D. L., & Lukaszewski, K. M. (2009). An expanded model of the factors affecting the acceptance and effectiveness of electronic human resource management systems. Human Resource Management Review, 19(2), 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Isenhour, L. C. (2005). E-recruiting: Online strategies for attracting talent. In Gueutal, H. G. & Stone, D. L. (Eds.), The brave new world of eHR: Human resources management in the digital age (pp. 22–53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Stone, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Johnson, T. L. (2013). Factors affecting the effectiveness and acceptance of electronic selection systems. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, D. L., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Lukaszewski, K. (2003). The functional and dysfunctional consequences of human resource information technology for organizations and their employees. In Stone, D. L. (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (pp. 37–68). Oxford, UK: JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, E. F. & Stone, D. L. (1990). Privacy in organizations: Theoretical issues, research findings, and protection mechanisms. Research in personnel and human resources management, 8(3), 349–411.Google Scholar

Stone-Romero, E. F., Isenhour, L. C., & Stone, D. L. (2011). Relations among values,ethnicity, and job choice trade off preferences. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Sturman, M. C., Hannon, J. M., & Milkovich, G. T. (1996). Computerized decision aids for flexible benefits decisions: The effects of an expert system and decision support system on employee intentions and satisfaction with benefits. Personnel Psychology, 49(4), 883–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sturman, M. C. & Milkovich, G. T. (1995). Validating expert systems: a demonstration using personal choice expert, a flexible employee benefit system. Decision Sciences, 26(1), 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thatcher, M. E. & Oliver, J. R. (2001). The impact of technology investments on a firm’s production efficiency, product quality, and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(2), 17–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Todd, P. & Benbasat, I. (1991). An experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids on decision making strategies. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ulrich, D. (2001). From e-Business to e-HR. IHRIM Journal, 5, 90–97.Google Scholar

Webster, J. & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitman, T. S. & Hyde, A. C. (1978). HRIS: Systematically matching the right person to the right position. Defense Management Journal, 14(2), 28–34.Google Scholar

Wiechmann, D. & Ryan, A. M. (2003). Reactions to computerized testing in selection contexts. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2/3), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Workscape. (2010). Automated compensation planning process enables more strategic decision making at Raytheon. Retrieved from www.workscape.com/~/media/Files/Client_Case_Studies/WorkscapeRaytheonCaseStudy.ashx.Google Scholar

Wright, A. (2017). Top HR Technology Trends for 2018. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/top-hr-technology-trends-2018.aspx.Google Scholar

Yanson, R. & Johnson, R. D. (2016). An empirical examination of e-learning design: The role of trainee socialization and complexity in short term training. Computers & Education, 101, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, D. (2003). Powering e-learning in the new millennium: An overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(2), 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zielinski, D. (2000). The lie of online learning. Training, 37(2), 38–40.Google Scholar

Zingheim, P. & Schuster, J. R. (2004). What’s the next great pay and reward innovation? Business value, paying for skill, and the internet. IHRIM Journal, 3(5), 47–50.Google Scholar

Zuboff, S. (1985). Automate/informate: The two faces of intelligent technology. Organizational Dynamics, 14(2), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zusman, R. R. & Landis, R. S. (2002). Applicant preferences for web-based versus traditional job postings. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar