Angelovska, T., Roehm, D., & Weinmüller, S. (2020). Uncovering Transfer Effects of Dominance and Proficiency in L3 English Acquisition Using the Visual Moving Window Paradigm and Grammaticality Judgments. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(1), 115–143.Google Scholar

Aparicio, X., & Lavaur, J. M. (2016). Masked Translation Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition by Trilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(6), 1369–1388.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The Role of the Second Language in Third Language Acquisition: The Case of Germanic Syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Sánchez, L. (2017). The L2 Status Factor Hypothesis Revisited: The Role of Metalinguistic Knowledge, Working Memory, Attention and Noticing in Third Language Learning. In Angelovska, T. & Hahn, A. (Eds.), L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, New Developments and Implications (pp. 85–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Brennan, J. R., & Hale, J. T. (2019). Hierarchical Structure Guides Rapid Linguistic Predictions during Naturalistic Listening. PLoS ONE, 14, article e0207741.Google Scholar

Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2010). Modeling the Noun Phrase versus Sentence Coordination Ambiguity in Dutch: Evidence from Surprisal Theory. In Hale, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (pp. 72–80). Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Rothman, J. (2010). On L3 Acquisition and Phonological Permeability: A New Test Case for Debates on the Mental Representation of Non-native Phonological Systems. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2–3), 275–296.Google Scholar

Caramazza, A., & Brones, I. (1979). Lexical Access in Bilinguals. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13(4), 212–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carvalho, A. M., & Da Silva, A. J. B. (2006). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: The Case of Spanish–English Bilinguals’ Acquisition of Portuguese. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 185–202.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2003). The Additive Effect of Bilingualism on Third Language Acquisition: A Review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaouch-Orozco, A., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2021). Individual Differences in Bilingual Word Recognition: The Role of Experiential Factors and Word Frequency in Cross-Language Lexical Priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(2), 447–474.Google Scholar

Colomé, À., & Miozzo, M. (2010). Which Words Are Activated during Bilingual Word Production? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 96.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or Additional Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

De Groot, A. M., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The Processing of Interlexical Homographs in Translation Recognition and Lexical Decision: Support for Non-selective Access to Bilingual Memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53(2), 397–428.Google Scholar

Dekydtspotter, L., & Renaud, C. (2014). On Second Language Processing and Grammatical Development: The Parser in Second Language Acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 131–165.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. (2002). The Architecture of the Bilingual Word Recognition System: From Identification to Decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual Homograph Recognition: Effects of Task Demands and Language Intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 51–66.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. (1999). Recognition of Cognates and Interlingual Homographs: The Neglected Role of Phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 496–518.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Wahl, A., Buytenhuijs, F., et al. (2019). Multilink: A Computational Model for Bilingual Word Recognition and Word Translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4), 657–679.Google Scholar

Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Influence of Prime Lexicality, Frequency, and Pronounceability on the Masked Onset Priming Effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(9), 1813–1837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Masked Translation Priming Effects with Highly Proficient Simultaneous Bilinguals. Experimental Psychology, 57(2), 98.Google Scholar

Duyck, W. (2005). Translation and Associative Priming with Cross-Lingual Pseudohomophones: Evidence for Nonselective Phonological Activation in Bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1340–1359.Google Scholar

Duyck, W., & Warlop, N. (2009). Translation Priming Between the Native Language and a Second Language: New Evidence from Dutch–French Bilinguals. Experimental Psychology, 56(3), 173–179.Google Scholar

Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Visual Word Recognition by Bilinguals in a Sentence Context: Evidence for Nonselective Lexical Access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 663–679.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of Instructed Language Learning. System, 33(2), 209–224.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2010). The Study of the Role of the Background Languages in Third Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. IRAL, 48 (2–3), 185–219.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2011). Object Pronouns in German L3 Syntax: Evidence for the L2 Status Factor. Second Language Research, 27(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for Language Acquisition: Comparing Adults’ and Children’s Patterns of Development in First, Second and Third Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, S. L. (2021). Toward Computational Models of Multilingual Sentence Processing. Language Learning, 71(S1), 193–218.Google Scholar

Frank, S. L., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2019). The Interaction between Structure and Meaning in Sentence Comprehension: Recurrent Neural Networks and Reading Times. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 337–343). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Frank, S. L., Trompenaars, T., & Vasishth, S. (2016). Cross‐Linguistic Differences in Processing Double‐Embedded Relative Clauses: Working‐Memory Constraints or Language Statistics? Cognitive Science, 40(3), 554–578.Google Scholar

Giancaspro, D., Halloran, B., & Iverson, M. (2015). Transfer at the Initial Stages of L3 Brazilian Portuguese: A Look at Three Groups of English/Spanish Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 191–207.Google Scholar

González Alonso, J., Alemán Bañón, J., DeLuca, V., et al. (2020). Event Related Potentials at Initial Exposure in Third Language Acquisition: Implications from an Artificial Mini-Grammar Study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 56, article 100939.Google Scholar

Goss, S. (2019). Word Recognition in a Language with Multiple Orthographies: A Semantic Masked-Priming Study of L1 Mandarin Learners of L3 Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 35(2), 235–255.Google Scholar

Hale, J. T. (2001). A Probabilistic Early Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 159–166). Stroudsburg., PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Hermas, A. (2014). Multilingual Transfer: L1 Morphosyntax in L3 English. International Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 1–24.Google Scholar

Hinaut, X., Twiefel, J., Petit, M., Dominey, P., & Wermter, S. (2015). A Recurrent Neural Network for Multiple Language Acquisition: Starting with English and French. In Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Cognitive Computation: Integrating Neural and Symbolic Approaches (CoCo 2015). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1583/CoCoNIPS_2015_paper_14.pdf.Google Scholar

Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cognate Effects in Picture Naming: Does Cross-Language Activation Survive a Change of Script? Cognition, 106(1), 501–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Iwata, T., Mochihashi, D., & Sawada, H. (2010). Learning Common Grammar from Multilingual Corpus. In Hajič, J., Carberry, S., Clark, S., & Nivre, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACL 2010 Conference Short Papers (pp. 184–188). Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J. (2014). Self-Paced Reading. In Jegerski, J. & VanPatten, B. (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics (pp. 20–49). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: English as a Third Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Jiang, N., & Forster, K. I. (2001). Cross-Language Priming Asymmetries in Lexical Decision and Episodic Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(1), 32–51.Google Scholar

Johnson, M., Schuster, M., Le, Q. V., & Krikun, M. (2017). Google’s Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5, 339–351.Google Scholar

Kaan, E. (2007). Event‐Related Potentials and Language Processing: A Brief Overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591.Google Scholar

Keating, G. D. (2014). Eye-Tracking with Text. In Jegerski, J. & VanPatten, B. (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics (pp. 69–92). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Klein, E. C. (1995). Second versus Third Language Acquisition: Is There a Difference? Language Learning, 45(3), 419–466.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A Critical Review and Assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 373–381.Google Scholar

Lago, S., Stutter Garcia, A., & Felser, C. (2019). The Role of Native and Non-native Grammars in the Comprehension of Possessive Pronouns. Second Language Research, 35(3), 319–349.Google Scholar

Lago, S., Mosca, M., & Stutter Garcia, A. (2021). The Role of Crosslinguistic Influence in Multilingual Processing: Lexicon Versus Syntax. Language Learning, 71(S1), 163–192.Google Scholar

Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., & Michel, M. (2004). Three Languages, One ECHO: Cognate Effects in Trilingual Word Recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(5), 585–611.Google Scholar

Leung, Y. K. I. (2005). L2 vs. L3 Initial State: A Comparative Study of the Acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese Monolinguals and Cantonese–English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 39–61.Google Scholar

Levy, R. (2013). Memory and Surprisal in Human Sentence Comprehension. In Van Gompel, R. P. G. (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 78–114). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, S., & Phillips, C. (2015). Aligning Grammatical Theories and Language Processing Models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lijewska, A., & Chmiel, A. (2015). Cognate Facilitation in Sentence Context–Translation Production by Interpreting Trainees and Non-interpreting Trilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(3), 358–375.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Zhang, J. (2018). Deep Learning in Machine Translation. In Deng, L. & Liu, Y. (Eds.), Deep Learning in Natural Language Processing. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using Priming Methods in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2011). Effects of Cognate Status on Word Comprehension in Second Language Learners: An ERP Investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1634–1647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morgan-Short, K., & Tanner, D. (2014). Event-Related Potentials (ERPs). In Jegerski, J. & VanPatten, B. (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics (pp. 127–152). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nakayama, M., Ida, K., & Lupker, S. J. (2016). Cross-Script L2–L1 Noncognate Translation Priming in Lexical Decision Depends on L2 Proficiency: Evidence from Japanese–English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 1001–1022.Google Scholar

Nakayama, M., Lupker, S. J., & Itaguchi, Y. (2018). An Examination of L2–L1 Noncognate Translation Priming in the Lexical Decision Task: Insights from Distributional and Frequency-Based Analyses. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 265–277.Google Scholar

Newman, A. J. (2014). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI). In Jegerski, J. & VanPatten, B. (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics (pp. 153–184). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st Century: Disciplinary Progress, Transdisciplinary Relevance, and the Bi/Multilingual Turn. Language Learning, 63, 1–24.Google Scholar

Padmanabhan, J., & Johnson Premkumar, M. J. (2015). Machine Learning in Automatic Speech Recognition: A Survey. IETE Technical Review, 32(4), 240–251.Google Scholar

Pereira Soares, S. M., & Rothman, J. (2021). Cognitive States in Third Language Acquisition and Beyond: Theoretical and Methodological Paths Forward. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pereira Soares, S. M., Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2022). Testing Potential Transfer Effects in Heritage and Adult L2 Bilinguals Acquiring a Mini Grammar as an Additional Language: An ERP Approach. Brain Sciences, 12(5), 669.Google Scholar

Poarch, G. J., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). Cross-Language Activation in Same-Script and Different-Script Trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6), 693–716.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2020). A Systematic Review of Transfer Studies in Third Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64.Google Scholar

Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. A. (2013). Processing Tense/Aspect-Agreement Violations on-Line in the Second Language: A Self-Paced Reading Study with French and German L2 Learners of English. Second Language Research, 29(4), 413–439.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2008). Aspect Selection in Adult L2 Spanish and the Competing Systems Hypothesis: When Pedagogical and Linguistic Rules Conflict. Languages in Contrast, 8(1), 74–106.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2010). On the Typological Economy of Syntactic Transfer: Word Order and Relative Clause High/Low Attachment Preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. IRAL, 48(2–3), 245–273.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2011). L3 Syntactic Transfer Selectivity and Typological Determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What Variables Condition Syntactic Transfer? A Look at the L3 Initial State. Second Language Research, 26(2), 189–218.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., Alemán Bañón, J., & González Alonso, J. (2015). Neurolinguistic Measures of Typological Effects in Multilingual Transfer: Introducing an ERP Methodology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1087.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., González Alonso, J. & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual Education Enhances Third Language Acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(1), 23–44.Google Scholar

Schoonbaert, S., Duyck, W., Brysbaert, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2009). Semantic and Translation Priming from a First Language to a Second and Back: Making Sense of the Findings. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 569–586.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. (1999). “Transfer” and L2 Acquisition of Syntax: Where Are We Now? (“Transfer”: Maligned, Realigned, Reconsidered, Redefined). In Oga, K. & Poole, G. (Eds.), Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics (vol. 5; pp. 211–234). Newcastle: University of Newcastle.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 Cognitive States and the Full Transfer/Full Access Model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72.Google Scholar

Szubko-Sitarek, W. (2011). Cognate Facilitation Effects in Trilingual Word Recognition. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 189–208.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. (1988). The Role Played by Metalinguistic Awareness in Second and Third Language Learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 235–246.Google Scholar

Tytus, A. E. (2017). Asymmetrical Priming Effects: An Exploration of Trilingual German–English–French Lexico-Semantic Memory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1625–1644.Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of Memory Circuits to Language: The Declarative/Procedural Model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270.Google Scholar

Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., Duyck, W., Welvaert, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). The Influence of Semantic Constraints on Bilingual Word Recognition during Sentence Reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1), 88–107.Google Scholar

Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign Language Knowledge Can Influence Native Language Performance in Exclusively Native Contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 780–789.Google Scholar

Van Hell, J. G., & De Groot, A. M. (2008). Sentence Context Modulates Visual Word Recognition and Translation in Bilinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 431–451.Google Scholar

Wen, Y., & Van Heuven, W. J. (2017). Non-cognate Translation Priming in Masked Priming Lexical Decision Experiments: A Meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 879–886.Google Scholar

Xia, V., & Andrews, S. (2015). Masked Translation Priming Asymmetry in Chinese–English Bilinguals: Making Sense of the Sense Model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(2), 294–325.Google Scholar

Aronin, L., & Hufeisen, B. (2009). The Exploration of Multilingualism: Development of Research on L3, Multilingualism and Multiple Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2015). Corpus-Based and Corpus-Driven Analyses of Language Variation and Use. In Heine, B. & Narrog, H. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257.Google Scholar

Divjak, D. S., & Gries, S. Th. (2006). Ways of Trying in Russian: Clustering Behavioral Profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(1), 23–60.Google Scholar

Gries, S. T. (2008). Corpus-Based Methods in Analyses of Second Language Acquisition Data. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 416–441). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gries, S. T. (2005). Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-Based Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(4), 365–399.Google Scholar

Gries, S. T., & Deshors, S. C. (2020). There’s More to Alternations Than the Main Diagonal of a 2×2 Confusion Matrix: improvements of MuPDAR and Other Classificatory Alternation Studies. ICAME Journal, 44, 69–96.Google Scholar

Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending Collostructional Analysis: A Corpus-Based Perspective on “Alternations.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129.Google Scholar

Hilpert, M., & Gries, S. T. (2016). Quantitative Approaches to Diachronic Corpus Linguistics. In Kytö, M. & Pahta, P. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics (pp. 36–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Jansegers, M., & Gries, S. T. (2020). Towards a Dynamic Behavioral Profile: A Diachronic Study of Polysemous Sentir in Spanish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(1), 145–187.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2013). L1/L2/L3 Writing Development: Longitudinal Case Study of a Japanese Multicompetent Writer. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 4–33.Google Scholar

Kruse, M. (2018). La transferencia en personas plurilingües: los falsos amigos como un obstáculo y una oportunidad en la enseñanza y aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar

Lissón, P., & Ballier, N. (2018). Investigating Lexical Progression through Lexical Diversity Metrics in a Corpus of French L3. Discours, 23. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.9950.Google Scholar

Lissón, P., & Trujillo González, V. C. (2018). Détection des transferts interlangues chez des apprenants universitaires de français troisième langue (Synergies Espagne 11). Sylvains-les-Moulins: Gerflint.Google Scholar

Lozano, C., & Mendikoetxea, A. (2013). Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition: The Design and Collection of CEDEL2. In Díaz-Negrillo, A., Ballier, N., & Thompson, P. (Eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data (pp. 65–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Lu, H.-C., Cheng, A.-C., & Hung, S. Y. (2019). Corpus-Based Study of L3 Acquisition on Spanish Past Tense: Evidence from Learners’ Oral Production. Revista De Lingüística Y Lenguas Aplicadas, 14, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnery, A., & Xiao, Z. (2004). Character Encoding in Corpus Construction. In Wynne, M., (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. Oxford:AHDS Literature, Languages and Linguistics. http://users.ox.ac.uk/~martinw/dlc/index.htm.Google Scholar

Michalke, M. (2017). Package “koRpus”: An R Package for Text Analysis (Version 0.06-5). http://reaktanz.de/?c=hacking&s=koRpus.Google Scholar

Paquot, M., & Gries, S. T. (Eds.) (2021). The Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

R Core Team. (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, A. (2020). Corpus Linguistics: A Guide to the Methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction Between Words and Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243.Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2005). Covarying Collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 1-43.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, B. (2017). Variationist Sociolinguistics and Corpus-Based Variationist Linguistics: Overlap and Cross-Pollination Potential. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne De Linguistique, 62(4), 685–701.Google Scholar

Veirano Pinto, M., & Berber-Sardinha, T. (2019). Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language Switches in L3 Production: Implications for a Polyglot Speaking Model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333.Google Scholar

Wulff, S. (2017). What Corpus Research Can Contribute to Multilingualism Research. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 734–753.Google Scholar

Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2008). Multilingualism as a New Linguistic Dispensation. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2012). Multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The Role of the Second Language in Third Language Acquisition: The Case of Germanic Syntax. Second Language Research, 23, 459–484.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). The L2 Status Factor and the Declarative/Procedural Distinction. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Lindqvist, C. (2007). The Role of Proficiency and Psychotypology in Lexical Cross-Linguistic Influence: A Study of a Multilingual Learner of Italian L3. In Chini, M., Desideri, P., Favilla, M.E., & Pallotti, G. (Eds.), Atti Del VI Congresso Di Studi Dell’Assoziatione Italiana Di Linguistica Applicata, Napoli, February 9–10, 2006 (pp. 123–145). Perugia: Guerra Editore.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Sánchez, L. (2017). The L2 Status Factor Revisited: The Role of Metalinguistic Knowledge, Working Memory, Attention and Noticing in Third Language Learning. In Angelovska, T. & Hahn, A. (Eds.), L3 Syntactic Transfer. Models, New Developments and Implications (pp. 85–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Belcher, D., & Connor, U. (Eds.) (2001). Reflections on Multiliterate Lives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J., & Backus, A. (2013). Superdiverse Repertoires and the Individual. In De Saint-Georges, I. & Weber, J.-J. (Eds.), Multilingualism and Multimodality: Current Challenges for Educational Studies (pp. 11−32). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Busch, B. (2012). The Linguistic Repertoire Revisited. Applied Linguistics, 33, 503–523.Google Scholar

Busch, B. (2017). Mehrsprachigkeit (2nd ed.). Vienna: Facultas.Google Scholar

Busch, B. (2018). The Language Portrait in Multilingualism Research: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 236. https://heteroglossia.net/fileadmin/user_upload/publication/busch18._The_language_portrait_copy.pdf.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or Additional Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. (1992). A Bilingual Production Model: Levelt’s “Speaking” Model Adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. (2004). The Multilingual Lexicon: Modelling Selection and Control. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 17–32.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second Language Development as a Dynamic Process. Modern Language Journal, 92, 166–178.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. (2008). Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. (2014). Case Study Research on Language Learning and Use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 233–255.Google Scholar

Efeoglu, G., Gülru Yüksel, H., & Baran, S. (2020). Lexical Cross-Linguistic Influence: a Study of Three Multilingual Learners of L3 English. International Journal of Multilingualism, 17, 535–551.Google Scholar

Elwert, W. T. (1960). Das zweisprachige Individuum. Ein Selbstzeugnis. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz, Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, 1959(6). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Falk, Y. (2017). On Pronouns that Drop (Out of German). In Angelovska, T. & Hahn, A. (Eds.), L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, New Developments and Implications (pp. 127–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2010). The Study of the Role of the Background Languages in Third Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 185–220.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2011). Object Pronouns in German L3 Syntax: Evidence for the L2 Status Factor. Second Language Research, 27, 59–82.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Lindqvist, C. (2019). L1 and L2 Role Assignment in L3 Learning: Is There a Pattern? International Journal of Multilingualism, 16, 411–424.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for Language Acquisition: Comparing Adults’ and Children’s Patterns of Development in First, Second and Third Acquisition of Relative Clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–16.Google Scholar

Franceschini, R., & Miecznikowski, J. (Eds.) (2004). Leben mit mehreren Sprachen: Sprachbiographien/Vivre avec plusieurs langues: Biographies langagières. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Gall, M., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar

Gomm, R., Hammersley, M., & Foster, P. (Eds.) (2000). Case Study Methods: Key Issues, Key Texts. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1986). Control, Activation and Resource: A Framework and a Model for the Control of Speech in Bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210–223.Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1998). Mental Control of the Bilingual Mental-Semantic System. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2001). The Bilingual’s Language Modes. In Nicol, J. L. (Ed.), One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. (1964). Linguistic and Social Interaction in Two Communities. American Anthropologist, 66(6/2), 137–153.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Introduction. In Gumperz, John L. & Hymes, Dell (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (pp. 1–25). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Gut, U. (2010). Cross-Linguistic Influence in L3 Phonological Acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 19–38.Google Scholar

Hall, C. J., & Ecke, P. (2003). Parasitism as a Default Mechanism in L3 Vocabulary Acquisition. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), The Multilingual Lexicon (pp. 71–85) Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (2001). Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 Production and Acquisition. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 21–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (2006). Activation de L1 et L2 lors de la production orale en L3: Étude comparative de deux cas. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère (AILE), 24, 45–74. An English version is published as Hammarberg, B. (2009). Activation of L1 and L2 During Production in L3: A Comparison of Two Case Studies. In B. Hammarberg (Ed.), Processes in Third Language Acquisition (pp. 101–126). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (Ed.) (2009). Processes in Third Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (2014). Problems in Defining the Concepts of L1, L2 and L3. In Otwinowska, A. & De Angelis, G. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in Multilingual Contexts (pp. 3–18). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (2017). Becoming Multilingual: The Macro and the Micro Time Perspective. IRAL, 55: 3–22.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (2018). L3, the Tertiary Language. In Bonnet, A. & Siemund, P. (Eds.), Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Heteroglossia. http://heteroglossia.net.Google Scholar

Hufeisen, B. (2005). Multilingualism: Linguistic Models and Related Issues. In Hufeisen, B. & Fouser, R. J. (Eds.), Introductory Readings in L3 (pp. 31–45). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar

Hufeisen, B. (2010). Theoretische Fundierung multiplen Sprachenlernens – Faktorenmodell 2.0. Jahrbuch Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 36, 200–207.Google Scholar

Hufeisen, B. (2018). Models of Multilingual Competence. In Bonnet, A. & Siemund, P. (Eds.), Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms (pp. 173–189). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. (2016a). The Polyglot – An Initial Characterization on the Basis of Multiple Anecdotal Accounts. In Hyltenstam, K. (Ed.), Advanced Proficiency and Exceptional Ability in Second Languages (pp. 215–240). Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. (2016b). The Exceptional Ability of Polyglots to Achieve High-Level Proficiency in Numerous Languages. In Hyltenstam, K. (Ed.), Advanced Proficiency and Exceptional Ability in Second Languages (pp. 241–272). Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. (2018). Polyglotism: A Synergy of Abilities and Predispositions. In Hyltenstam, K., Bartning, I., & Fant, L. (Eds.), High-Level Language Proficiency in Second Language and Multilingual Contexts (pp. 170–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jessner, U. (2008). A DST Model of Multilingualism and the Role of Metalinguistic Awareness. The Modern Language Journal 92: 270–283.Google Scholar

Kamanga, C. M. M. (2009). The Joys and Pitfalls of Multiple Language Acquisition: The Workings of the Mind of a Simultaneous Multilingual. In Todeva, E. & Cenoz, J. (Eds.), The Multiple Realities of Multilingualism (pp. 115–134). Berlin: Mouton De GruyterGoogle Scholar

Kellerman, E. (1983). Now You See it, Now You Don’t. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (Eds.), Language Transfer in Language Learning (pp. 112–134). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Kemp, C. (2007). Strategic Processing in Grammar Learning: Do Multilinguals Use More Strategies? International Journal of Multilingualism, 4, 241–261.Google Scholar

Kemp, C. (2009). Defining Multilingualism. In Aronin, L. & Hufeisen, B. (Eds.), The Exploration of Multilingualism (pp. 11–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2009). The Multilingual Subject: What Foreign Language Learners Say about Their Experience and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). The Architecture of Normal Spoken Language Use. In Blanken, G., Dittmann, J., Grimm, H., Marschall, J. C., & Wallesch, C.-W. (Eds.), Language Disorders and Pathologies: An International Handbook (pp. 1–15). Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar

Lindqvist, C., & Bardel, C. (2014). Exploring the Impact of the Proficiency and Typology Factors: Two Cases of Multilingual Learners’ L3 Learning. In Pawlak, M. & Aronin, L. (Eds.), Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism (pp. 253–266). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Mißler, B. (2000). Previous Experience of Foreign Language Learning and Its Contribution to the Development of Learning Strategies. In Dentler, S., Hufeisen, B., & Lindemann, B (Eds.), Tertiär- und Drittsprachen: Projekte und empirische Untersuchungen (pp. 7–21). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar

Newmark, L., & Reibel, D. A. (1968). Necessity and Sufficiency in Language Learning. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 6, 145–164.Google Scholar

Ó Laoire, M., & Singleton, D. (2009). The Role of Prior Knowledge in L3 Learning and Use: Further Evidence of Psychotypological Dimensions. In Aronin, L. & Hufeisen, B. (Eds.), The Exploration of Multilingualism: Development of Research on L3, Multilingualism and Multiple Language Acquisition (pp. 79–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic Narratives as Data in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28, 163–188.Google Scholar

Pietikäinen, S., Alanen, R., Dufva, H., et al. (2008). Languaging in Ultima Thule: Multilingualism in the Life of a Sami Boy. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5, 79–99.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2011). L3 Syntactic Transfer Selectivity and Typological Determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27, 107–127.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What Variables Condition Syntactic Transfer? A Look at the L3 Initial State. Second Language Research, 26, 189–218.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schiffmann, H. (1996). Linguistic Culture and Language Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. (1987). Mother and Other Tongue Influence on Learner French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 327–345.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. & Ó Laoire, M. (2006). Psychotypologie et facteur L2 dans l’influence translexicale. Une analyse de l’influence de l’anglais et de l’irlandais sur le français L3 de l’apprenant. AILE, Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 24, 101–117.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2017). The Scalpel Model of Third Language Acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665.Google Scholar

Smidfelt, L. (2015). Il processo delle inferenze lessicali in italiano L3 – il ruolo delle lingue apprese in precedenza e altre strategie di comprensione. Etudes Romanes de Lund (Licenciate thesis). Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar

Smidfelt, L. (2018). An Intercomprehension Study of Multilingual Swedish L1 Speakers Reading and Decoding Words in Text in Italian, an Unknown Language. Lingua, 204, 62–77.Google Scholar

Smidfelt, L. (2019). Studies on Lexical Inferencing and Inter-Comprehension of Italian as a Foreign Language in a Swedish Setting. PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar

Smidfelt, L. & van de Weijer, J. (2019). Prior Language Knowledge and Intercomprehension at the First Encounter of Italian as an Additional Language. A Translation Task. Moderna Språk, 113(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Stakhnevich, J. (2005). Third Language Acquisition in Immersion: A Case Study of a Bilingual Immigrant Learner. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies: An International Journal, 2(4), 215–232.Google Scholar

Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar

Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Tavakol, M., & Jabbari, A. (2014). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language (L3) and Fourth Language (L4) Acquisition of the Syntactic Licensing of Subject Pronouns and Object Verb Property: A Case Study. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3, 29–42.Google Scholar

Todeva, E., & Cenoz, J. (Eds.) (2009). The Multiple Realities of Multilingualism: Personal Narratives and Researchers’ Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

van Lier, L. (2005). Case Study. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 207–221). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic Influence in the Acquisition of a Third Language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682.Google Scholar

Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language Switches in L3 Production: Implications for a Polyglot Speaking Model. Applied Linguistics, 19, 295–333. Reproduced in B. Hammarberg (Ed.), (2009). Processes in Third Language Acquisition (pp. 28–73). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (rev. ed.). Newbury Park: SAGE.Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications (6th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar

Amato, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). Sentence Processing in an Artificial Language: Learning and Using Combinatorial Constraints. Cognition, 116(1), 143–148.Google Scholar

Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2015). The Bilingual Advantage in Phonetic Learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 683–695.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). The L2 Status Factor and the Declarative/Procedural Distinction. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Batterink, L., & Neville, H. (2013). Implicit and Explicit Second Language Training Recruit Common Neural Mechanisms for Syntactic Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(6), 936–951.Google Scholar

Berkes, É., & Flynn, S. (2012).Further Evidence in Support of the Cumulative-Enhancement Model. In Cabrelli, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bowden, H. W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-Like Brain Processing of Syntax Can Be Attained by University Foreign Language Learners. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2492–2511.Google Scholar

Buffington, J., & Morgan-Short, K. (2019). Declarative and Procedural Memory as Individual Differences in Second Language Aptitude. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (Eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research, and Practice (pp. 215–237). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Caffarra, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Second Language Syntactic Processing Revealed through Event-Related Potentials: An Empirical Review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 31–47.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2003). The Additive Effect of Bilingualism on Third Language Acquisition: A Review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 71–87.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2013). The Influence of Bilingualism on Third Language Acquisition: Focus on Multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46, 71–86.Google Scholar

Cox, J. G. (2017). Explicit Instruction, Bilingualism, and the Older Adult Learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 29–58.Google Scholar

Culbertson, J., & Schuler, K. (2019). Artificial Language Learning in Children. Annual Review of Linguistics, 5, 353–373.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Escudero, P., Mulak, K. E., Fu, C. S. L., & Singh, L. (2016). More Limitations to Monolingualism: Bilinguals Outperform Monolinguals in Implicit Word Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1218.Google Scholar

Ettlinger, M., Morgan‐Short, K., Faretta‐Stutenberg, M., & Wong, P. (2016). The Relationship between Artificial and Second Language Learning. Cognitive Science, 40(4), 822–847.Google Scholar

Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K. (2018). The Interplay of Individual Differences and Context of Learning in Behavioral and Neurocognitive Second Language Development. Second Language Research, 34(1), 67–101.Google Scholar

Ferman, S., & Karni, A. (2010). No Childhood Advantage in the Acquisition of Skill in Using an Artificial Language Rule. PloS One, 5(10), article e13648.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for Language Acquisition: Comparing Adults’ and Children’s Patterns of Development in First, Second and Third Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16.Google Scholar

Folia, V., Uddén, J., De Vries, M., Forkstam, C., & Petersson, K. M. (2010). Artificial Language Learning in Adults and Children. Language Learning, 60(S2), 188–220.Google Scholar

Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain Signatures of Artificial Language Processing: Evidence Challenging the Critical Period Hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(1), 529–534.Google Scholar

Gabriele, A., Alemán Bañón, J., Hoffman, L., et al. (2021). Examining Variability in the Processing of Agreement in Novice Learners: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4(7), 1106–1140.Google Scholar

González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2017). Coming of Age in L3 Initial Stages Transfer Models: Deriving Developmental Predictions and Looking towards the Future. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

González Alonso, J., Alemán Bañón, J., DeLuca, V., et al. (2020). Event Related Potentials at Initial Exposure in Third Language Acquisition: Implications from an Artificial Mini-Grammar Study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 56, article 100939.Google Scholar

Grey, S. (2020). What Can Artificial Languages Reveal about Morphosyntactic Processing in Bilinguals? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 81–86.Google Scholar

Grey, S., & Tagarelli, K. M. (2018). Psycholinguistic Methods. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology (pp. 287–312). London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental Exposure and L3 Learning of Morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 611–645.Google Scholar

Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Individual Differences in Incidental Language Learning: Phonological Working Memory, Learning Styles, and Personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 44–53.Google Scholar

Grey, S., Sanz, C., Morgan-Short, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2018). Bilingual and Monolingual Adults Learning an Additional Language: ERPs Reveal Differences in Syntactic Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 970–994.Google Scholar

Grundy, J. G., & Timmer, K. (2017). Bilingualism and Working Memory Capacity: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis. Second Language Research, 33(3), 325–340.Google Scholar

Hamrick, P. (2015). Declarative and Procedural Memory Abilities as Individual Differences in Incidental Language Learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 9–15.Google Scholar

Hamrick, P., & Sachs, R. (2018). Establishing Evidence of Learning in Experiments Employing Artificial Linguistic Systems. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 153–169.Google Scholar

Hayakawa, S., Ning, S., & Marian, V. (2020). From Klingon to Colbertian: Using Artificial Languages to Study Word Learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 74–80.Google Scholar

Kaan, E. (2007). Event-Related Potentials and Language Processing: A Brief Overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Reanalysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98–110.Google Scholar

Kapa, L. L., & Colombo, J. (2014). Executive Function Predicts Artificial Language Learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 237–252.Google Scholar

Kaushanskaya, M. (2012). Cognitive Mechanisms of Word Learning in Bilingual and Monolingual Adults: The Role of Phonological Memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 470–489.Google Scholar

Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647.Google Scholar

Lado, B. (2017). Aptitude and Pedagogical Conditions in the Early Development of a Nonprimary Language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(3), 679–701.Google Scholar

Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., Stafford, C., & Sanz, C. (2017). Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner. Hispania, 100(3), 361–378.Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working Memory and Second Language Comprehension and Production: A Meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883.Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, K. (2014). Electrophysiological Approaches to Understanding Second Language Acquisition: A Field Reaching Its Potential. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 15–36.Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, K. (2020). Insights into the Neural Mechanisms of Becoming Bilingual: A Brief Synthesis of Second Language Research with Artificial Linguistic Systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 87–91.Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second Language Acquisition of Gender Agreement in Explicit and Implicit Training Conditions: An Event-Related Potential Study. Language Learning, 60(1), 154–193.Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). Explicit and Implicit Second Language Training Differentially Affect the Achievement of Native-Like Brain Activation Patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 933–947.Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Carpenter, H., & Wong, P. (2014). Declarative and Procedural Memory as Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 56.Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, K., Deng, Z., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., et al. (2015). A View of the Neural Representation of Second Language Syntax through Artificial Language Learning Under Implicit Contexts of Exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 383–419.Google Scholar

Mueller, J. L., Hahne, A., Fujii, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Native and Nonnative Speakers’ Processing of a Miniature Version of Japanese as Revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1229–1244.Google Scholar

Nation, R., & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Novices and Experts: An Information Processing Approach to the “Good Language Learner” Problem. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7(1), 41–55.Google Scholar

Nayak, N., Hansen, N., Krueger, N., & McLaughlin, B. (1990). Language-Learning Strategies in Monolingual and Multilingual Adults. Language Learning, 40(2), 221–244.Google Scholar

Nevat, M., Ullman, M. T., Eviatar, Z., & Bitan, T. (2017). The Neural Bases of the Learning and Generalization of Morphological Inflection. Neuropsychologia, 98, 139–155.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages (vol. 40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pili‐Moss, D. (2021). Cognitive Predictors of Child Second Language Comprehension and Syntactic Learning. Language Learning, 71(3), 907–945.Google Scholar

Pili-Moss, D., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K. (2020). Contributions of Declarative and Procedural Memory to Accuracy and Automatization during Second Language Practice. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(3), 639–651.Google Scholar

Poepsel, T. J., & Weiss, D. J. (2016). The Influence of Bilingualism on Statistical Word Learning. Cognition, 152, 9–19.Google Scholar

Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 829–856.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2010). Implicit Artificial Grammar and Incidental Natural Second Language Learning: How Comparable Are They? Language Learning, 60(S2), 245–263.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2011). L3 Syntactic Transfer Selectivity and Typological Determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and Cognitive Motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of Third Language (L3) Transfer: Timing of Acquisition and Proficiency Considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., González Alonso, J. & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer (vol. 163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ruiz, S., Tagarelli, K. M., & Rebuschat, P. (2018). Simultaneous Acquisition of Words and Syntax: Effects of Exposure Condition and Declarative Memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article 1168.Google Scholar

Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual Education Enhances Third Language Acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 23–44.Google Scholar

Sanz, C., Park, H. I., & Lado, B. (2015). A Functional Approach to Cross-Linguistic Influence in Ab Initio L3 Acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 236–251.Google Scholar

Sengottuvel, K., Vasudevamurthy, A., Ullman, M. T., & Earle, F. S. (2020). Learning and Consolidation of Declarative Memory in Good and Poor Readers of English as a Second Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, article 715.Google Scholar

Siegelman, N., & Arnon, I. (2015). The Advantage of Starting Big: Learning from Unsegmented Input Facilitates Mastery of Grammatical Gender in an Artificial Language. Journal of Memory and Language, 85, 60–75.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2014). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2017). The Scalpel Model of Third Language Acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665.Google Scholar

Stafford, C. A., Bowden, H. W., & Sanz, C. (2012). Optimizing Language Instruction: Matters of Explicitness, Practice, and Cue Learning. Language Learning, 62(3), 741–768.Google Scholar

Stafford, C. A., Sanz, C., & Bowden, H. W. (2010). An Experimental Study of Early L3 Development: Age, Bilingualism and Classroom Exposure. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(2), 162–183.Google Scholar

Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. A. (2012). Language-Related ERP Components. In Kappenman, E. S & Luck, S. J (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components (pp. 397–440). Oxford: Oxford Academic.Google Scholar

Tagarelli, K. M. (2014). The Neurocognition of Adult Second Language Learning: An FMRI Study. Doctoral dissertation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Tagarelli, K. M., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Working Memory, Learning Conditions and the Acquisition of L2 Syntax. In Zhisheng, M., Borges Mota, M., & McNeil, A. (Eds.), Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing: Theory, Research, and Commentary. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Tagarelli, K. M., Ruiz, S., Moreno Vega, J. L., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Variability in Second Language Learning: The Roles of Individual Differences, Learning Conditions, and Linguistic Complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 293–316.Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2001). The Neural Basis of Lexicon and Grammar in First and Second Language: The Declarative/Procedural Model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105–122.Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2020). The Declarative/Procedural Model: A Neurobiologically Motivated Theory of First and Second Language. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S. (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (3rd ed.; pp. 128–161). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-Related Brain Potentials and Second Language Learning: Syntactic Processing in Late L2 Learners at Different L2 Proficiency Levels. Second Language Research, 26(1), 43–74.Google Scholar

Weber, K., Christiansen, M. H., Petersson, K. M., Indefrey, P., & Hagoort, P. (2016). FMRI Syntactic and Lexical Repetition Effects Reveal the Initial Stages of Learning a New Language. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(26), 6872–6880.Google Scholar

Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic Influence in the Acquisition of a Third Language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682.Google Scholar

Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without Awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.Google Scholar

Williams, J. N., & Kuribara, C. (2008). Comparing a Nativist and Emergentist Approach to the Initial Stage of SLA: An Investigation of Japanese Scrambling. Lingua, 118, 522–553.Google Scholar

Akaike, H. (1974). A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 19(6), 716–723.Google Scholar

Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists Rise Up against Statistical Significance. Nature, 567, 305–307.Google Scholar

Bayes, T. (1763). LII. An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. By the Late Rev. Mr. Bayes, FRS Communicated by Mr. Price, in a Letter to John Canton, AMFR S. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 370–418.Google Scholar

Bürkner, P. C. (2016). “brms”: Bayesian Regression Models Using Stan. R package version 1.5.0.Google Scholar

Cabrelli, J., & Pichan, C. (2021). Initial Phonological Transfer in L3 Brazilian Portuguese and Italian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(2), 131–167.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (2012). Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Homan, M., et al. (2017). Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. Journal of Statistical Software, Articles, 76(1), 1–32.Google Scholar

Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1993). Relative Clause Interpretation Preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, 36(4), 353–372.Google Scholar

Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1999). Another Word on Parsing Relative Clauses: Eyetracking Evidence from Spanish and English. Memory & Cognition, 27(5), 826–833.Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E. (2004). Parsing a First Language Like a Second: The Erosion of L1 Parsing Strategies in Spanish–English Bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(3), 355–371.Google Scholar

Fernandez, E. M. (2002). Relative Clause Attachment in Bilinguals and Monolinguals. Advances in Psychology, 134, 187–215.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for Language Acquisition: Comparing Adults’ and Children’s Patterns of Development in First, Second and Third Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. D. (2002). Prosodic Disambiguation in Silent Reading. In Hirotani, M (Ed.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar

Garcia, G. D. (2020). Language Transfer and Positional Bias in English Stress. Second Language Research, 36(4), 445–474.Google Scholar

Garcia, G. D. (2021). Data Visualization and Analysis in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gelman, A. (2008). Objections to Bayesian Statistics. Bayesian Analysis, 3(3), 445–449.Google Scholar

Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gelman, A., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. R package version 1.12–2.Google Scholar

Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., et al. (2014). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.; vol. 2). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1998). Constraints on Sentence Comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 262–268.Google Scholar

Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency Preference in the Human Sentence Processing Mechanism. Cognition, 59(1), 23–59.Google Scholar

Harrell, Jr., & Frank, E. (2021). Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.6–0.Google Scholar

Hox, J., & McNeish, D. (2020). Small Samples in Multilevel Modeling. In van De Schoot, R., & Miočević, M. (Eds.), Small Sample Size Solutions: A Guide for Applied Researchers and Practitioners. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Bayesian Estimation Supersedes the t Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 573–603.Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. (2021). Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(10), 1282–1291.Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K, Aguinis, H., & Joo, H. (2012). The Time Has Come: Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis in the Organizational Sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), 722–752.Google Scholar

Lamprecht, A.-L., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., et al. (2020). Towards FAIR Principles for Research Software. Data Science, 3(1), 37–59.Google Scholar

McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

McGrayne, S. B. (2011). The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, & Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McNeish, D. (2016). On Using Bayesian Methods to Address Small Sample Problems. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(5), 750–773.Google Scholar

Miyamoto, E. T. (1998). Relative Clause Attachment in Brazilian Portuguese. Unpublished manuscript. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Nicenboim, B., Schad, D. J., & Vasishth, S. (2021). An Introduction to Bayesian Data Analysis for Cognitive Science. https://vasishth.github.io/bayescogsci/book/.Google Scholar

Nuzzo, R. (2014). Scientific Method: Statistical Errors. Nature News, 506(7487), 150–152.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L. (2013). Study Quality in SLA: An Assessment of Designs, Analyses, and Reporting Practices in Quantitative L2 Research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 655–687.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L. (2014). Study Quality in Quantitative L2 Research (1990–2010): A Methodological Synthesis and Call for Reform. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 450–470.Google Scholar

R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2010). On the Typological Economy of Syntactic Transfer: Word Order and Relative Clause High/Low Attachment Preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching (IRAL), 48(2–3), 245–273.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2011). L3 Syntactic Transfer Selectivity and Typological Determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127.Google Scholar

RStudio Team. (2021). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC.Google Scholar

Sanz, C., & Lado, B. (2008). Third Language Acquisition Research Methods. Boston, MA: Springer US.Google Scholar

Sorensen, T., Hohenstein, S., & Vasishth, S. (2016). Bayesian Linear Mixed Models Using Stan: A Tutorial for Psychologists, Linguists, and Cognitive Scientists. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 175–200.Google Scholar

Van De Schoot, R., Broere, J. J, Perryck, K. H, et al. (2015). Analyzing Small Data Sets Using Bayesian Estimation: The Case of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Following Mechanical Ventilation in Burn Survivors. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 6(1), article 25216.Google Scholar

Vasishth, S., Nicenboim, B., Beckman, M. E, Li, F., & Kong, E. J. (2018). Bayesian Data Analysis in the Phonetic Sciences: A Tutorial Introduction. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 147–161.Google Scholar

Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., & Gabry, J. (2017). Practical Bayesian Model Evaluation Using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing, 27(5), 1413–1432.Google Scholar

Watanabe, S. (2013). A Widely Applicable Bayesian Information Criterion. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14, 867–897.Google Scholar