Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T20:08:18.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

45 - Renaissance Neoplatonism

from STRUCTURES OF THOUGHT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Glyn P. Norton
Affiliation:
Williams College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Renaissance Neoplatonism was the creation of the fifteenth-century Florentines Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and had a profound and far-reaching impact on the cultural as well as the intellectual and religious life of Europe for well over two centuries. It contributed a forma mentis that transcended disciplinary and national boundaries without necessarily coming into direct conflict with other contemporary mind-sets, those we associate with Aristotelianism, Protestantism, Ramism, neo-scholasticism, Hermeticism, Copernicanism, Tridentism, and so forth. Literature and its interpretation only played an ancillary role in what was at heart a philosophico-theological movement anchored in the concerns of medieval Catholicism but inspired by the attractive example of Plato's newly discovered dialogues on the one hand and by the dauntingly technical commentaries of the Neoplatonists on the other. But it did mean that the Platonic dialogue, with its dramatic shifts from interrogation to exposition to myth to fable to quotation to dialectical division in various sequences and combinations, was set up not so much as the literary but as the hermeneutical model; and that Plato's style, with its lucidity, suppleness, and figurative and ironic variety, became acknowledged as a way of doing philosophy that was in marked contrast to the wrangling of the schools and to the analytic systematizing of Aristotle. Plato became not only the great alternative to the Stagirite as a philosopher but a more profound and compelling alternative to Cicero as a model rhetorician.

One of the obvious issues the Platonic dialogue poses is that of genre. Ancient doxologists, such as Diogenes Laertius in his Lives of the philosophers 3.49–51, 58–61, had divided up the dialogues rather crudely under such heads as ‘political’, ‘ethical’, ‘logical’, ‘physical’, and ‘obstetrical’; but this could not satisfy those who were impressed by the dramatic unity of many of Plato's masterpieces and by the complexity and variety that subsisted in that unity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Michael J. B.Plato's third eye: studies in Marsilio Ficino's metaphysics and its sources, Aldershot, Hampshire: Variorum, 1995.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B.Synoptic art: Marsilio Ficino on the history of Platonic interpretation, Florence: Olschki, 1998.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B.The Platonism of Marsilio Ficino, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Cardini, Roberto, La critica del Landino, Florence: Sansoni, 1973.Google Scholar
Chastel, André, Art et humanisme à Florence au temps de Laurent le Magnifique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1961.Google Scholar
Chastel, André, Marsile Ficin et l'art (1954), Geneva: Droz, 1975.Google Scholar
Coulter, James A.The literary microcosm: theories of interpretation of the later Neoplatonists, Leiden: Brill, 1976.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio, Opera omnia; 1576; reprint Turin: Bottega d'Erasmo, 1959, 1962, 1983, ed. Kristeller, P. O. and Sancipriano, M., 2 vols.Google Scholar
Field, Arthur, The origins of the Platonic Academy of Florence, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst H.Icones symbolicae: philosophies of symbolism and their bearing on art’, in Symbolic images: studies in the art of the Renaissance, London: Phaidon, 1972.Google Scholar
Hankins, James, Plato in the Italian Renaissance, Leiden and New York: Brill, 1990, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Kallendorf, Craig, In praise of Aeneas: Virgil and epideictic rhetoric in the early Italian Renaissance; 1943; reprint Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1964.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar, The philosophy of Marsilio Ficino, New York: Columbia University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Lamberton, Robert, Homer the theologian: Neoplatonist allegorical reading and the growth of the epic tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Landino, Cristoforo, Scritti critici e teorici, ed. Cardini, R., Rome: Bulzoni, 1974.Google Scholar
Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni, Opera omnia; 1572; reprint Turin: Bottega d'Erasmo, 1971, ed. Garin, E., 2 vols.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Anne D. R.Studies in the 5th and 6th essays of Proclus' Commentary on the Republic, Hypomnemata 61, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N.The poet as creator: origins of a metaphor’, Comparative literature studies 5, 4 (1968).Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N.Plato's idea of poetical inspiration, Commentationes humanarum litterarum: societas scientiarum Fennica, 44, 2, Helsinki: no pub., 1969.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Gary, Music in Renaissance magic: towards a historiography of others, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Trimpi, Wesley, Muses of one mind: the literary analysis of experience and its continuity, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P.The ancient theology: studies in Christian Platonism from the fifteenth to the eighteenth century, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Warden, John (ed.), Orpheus: the metamorphoses of a myth, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Bernard, A history of literary criticism in the Italian Renaissance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961, 2 vols. [See esp. vol. I, pp. 71–249 on readings of Aristotle and Horace].Google Scholar
Weinberg, Bernard, A history of literary criticism in the Italian Renaissance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Wind, Edgar, Pagan mysteries in the Renaissance, rev. edn, New York: Norton, 1968.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×