Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:26:12.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - A Cinematography of Kurdishness

Identity, Industry and Resistance

from Part VI - Art, Culture and Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2021

Hamit Bozarslan
Affiliation:
Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris
Cengiz Gunes
Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
Veli Yadirgi
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access

Summary

This chapter problematizes the film modes of Kurdish presence to address the need for a radicalization of artistic tools in the name of artistic autonomy. The industrial mode of cinema’s desire for national totalities is valid in the Kurdish case through a pedagogy of the real to place traumatized Kurdishness in a victimhood discourse in the name of the recognition of Kurdish languages, and to claim its own popular narrations within limits defined by hegemonic powers - i.e. the officially recognized space for Kurdish languages in movie theatres. The limits of this very popular audience are also flagged by international film festivals’ taste and room for them. Within such a historical and political context, which sets Kurdish cinematography as a discursive tool within capitalist film modes, a claim for truth-telling emerges as the domestication of non-linear and non-smooth conflict zones in favour of a consumable form of Kurdish culture.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. D. Heller-Roazen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Akın, S. (2012). Language and cultural contact. In Berger, V. and Komori, M. (eds), Polyglot Cinema: Migration and Transcultural Narration in France, Italy, Portugal and Spain (pp. 111–24). Wien: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Aktaş, M. (2009). Kürt Sineması Artık Bir Gerçek. In Arslan, M. (ed.), Kürt Sineması: Yurtsuzluk, Sınır ve Ölüm (pp. 5668). Istanbul: Agora.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (2006). The Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Arslan, M. (2009). Kürt Sineması: Yurtsuzluk, Sınır ve Ölüm. Istanbul: Agora.Google Scholar
Ayata, B. (2011). Kurdish transnational politics and Turkey’s changing Kurdish policy: The journey of Kurdish broadcasting from Europe to Turkey. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 19 (4), 523–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, C. and Galasinski, D. (2001). Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis: A Dialogue on Language and Identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bonitzer, P. (2007). Bakış ve Ses, trans. İ. Yasar. Istanbul: Metis.Google Scholar
Bozarslan, H. (1990). Marginalité, idéologie et art: notes sur la vie et l’oeuvre de Yilmaz Güney. CEMOTI, no. 9, 2740.Google Scholar
Bozarslan, H. (2006). La représentation des Kurdes dans le cinéma. In Dakhlia, J. (ed.), Créations artistiques contemporaines en pays d’Islam. Des arts en tensions (pp. 201–8). Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
Candan, C. (2016). Kurdish documentaries in Turkey: An historical overview. In Koçer, S. and Candan, C. (eds), Kurdish Documentary Cinema in Turkey: The Politics and Aesthetics of Identity and Resistance (pp. 132). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Christie, I. (2013). Where is national cinema today (and do we still need it)? Film History: An Internation Journal, 25 (1–2), 1930.Google Scholar
Çiçek, C. (2015). Ulus, Din, Sınıf: Türkiye’de Kürt Mutabakatının İnşası. Istanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Çiçek, Ö. (2016). Kurdish cinema in Turkey: Imprisonment, memory and the archive. Unpublished PhD thesis, Binghamton University.Google Scholar
Çiftçi, A. (2015). The politics of text and context: Kurdish films in Turkey in a period of political transformation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Crofts, S. (2006). Reconceptualising national cinema/s. In Vitali, V. and Willemen, P. (eds), Theorising National Cinema (pp. 4458). London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Doğan, Z. (2013). Derdi Olan için Sinema Kendini Ifade Aracı. Film Arası, 3 (29), 6873.Google Scholar
Dönmez-Colin, G. (2014). The Routledge Dictionary of Turkish Cinema. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
e-flux (2020). ‘e-flux presents Rojava Film Commune: Forms of Freedom’. www.e-flux.com/program/314758/e-flux-presents-rojava-film-commune-forms-of-freedom/.Google Scholar
Ergül, S. (2018). Yılmaz Güney Sinemasının Mantıkları ve İşlemleri. In Şenel, B. and Kartal, O. (eds), Perdeye Yansıyan Kavga: Yılmaz Güney’den Emin Alper’e Politik Sinema (pp. 2346). Ankara: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Espinosa, J. G. (1979). For an imperfect cinema, trans. J. Burton. Jump Cut, 20, 24–6.Google Scholar
Evren, B. (2013). Balkanların ve Türk Sinemasının İlk Yönetmenlerinden Manaki Kardeşler. Hayal Perdesi, 37, 72–6.Google Scholar
Gürbilek, N. (2004). Kötü Çocuk Türk. Istanbul: Metis.Google Scholar
Hadaegh, B. and Zandi, M. (2015). Allegorized subaltern: Subjectivity and death in the works of Bahman Ghobadi. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5 (2), 370–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In Rutherford, J. (ed.), Identity Community Culture and Difference (pp. 222–37). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Hamid, R. and Ghobadi, B. (2005). The cinema of a stateless nation: An interview with Bahman Ghobadi. Cinéaste, 30 (3), 42–5.Google Scholar
Hassanpour, A. (1996). The creation of Kurdish media culture. In Kreyenbroek, P. and Allison, C. (eds), Kurdish Identity and Culture (pp. 4884). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hassanpour, A. (2003). The making of Kurdish identity: Pre-20th century historical and literary discourses. In Vali, A. (ed.), Essays on the Origins of Kurdish Nationalism (pp. 106–62). Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers.Google Scholar
Higson, A. (1989). The concept of national cinema. Screen, 30 (4), 3647.Google Scholar
Hoberman, J. (2013). Film after Film: Or What Became of 21st Century Cinema? London: Verso.Google Scholar
Jaguaribe, B. (2005). The shock of real: Realist aesthetics in the media and the urban experience. Space and Culture, 8 (1), 6682.Google Scholar
Kara, M. (2014). ‘Adile Işıyan, Kirkor Nubar’. Evrensel. www.evrensel.net/yazi/71636/adile-isiyan-kirkor-nubar.Google Scholar
Kennedy, T. (2007). Re-imagining Armenian, Kurdish, and Palestinian national identity in film. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Kılıç, D. (2009). Kürt Sinemasının Yükselişi. In Arslan, M. (ed.), Kürt Sineması: Yurtsuzluk, Sınır ve Ölüm (pp. 5668). Istanbul: Agora.Google Scholar
Koçer, S. (2013). Making transnational publics: Circuits of censorship and technologies of publicity in Kurdish media circulation. American Ethnologist, 40 (4), 721–33.Google Scholar
Koçer, S. (2014). Kurdish cinema as a transnational discourse genre: Cinematic visibility, cultural resilience, and political agency. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 46 (3), 473–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreyenbroek, P. and Allison, C. (eds) (1996). Kurdish Identity and Culture. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Lafuente, P. (2008). For a populist cinema: On Hito Steyerl’s November and Lovely Andrea. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry, 19 (Autumn/Winter), 6470.Google Scholar
Martens, T. (2019). ‘“Call of Duty: Modern Warfare” adds a female Middle Eastern soldier’s POV. Here’s why’. Los Angeles Times, 30 May. www.latimes.com/entertainment/herocomplex/la-et-hc-call-duty-modern-warfare-20190530-story.html.Google Scholar
Mbembe, J. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15 (1), 1140.Google Scholar
Metz, C. (1984). The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. London: The Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Mintaş, E. (2013). Barışın Sineması İnsan Hikayelerine Odaklanmalı. Film Arası, 3 (29), 74–7.Google Scholar
Natali, D. (2005). The Kurds and the State: Evolving National Identity in Iraq, Turkey and Iran. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Neon Exhibition (2019). ‘Rojava Film Commune’. https://neon.org.gr/en/exhibition/rojava-film-commune/.Google Scholar
Özcan, A. (2019). “Ama eşkıyalık çağı kapandı!”: Modern Türkiye’de Son Kürt Eşkıyalık: ağı(1950–1970). Istanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Özgüç, A. (1988). Arkadaşım Yılmaz Güney. Istanbul: Broy Yayınları.Google Scholar
Saleem, H. (2009). Sessizlik Kelimelerden Çok Daha Fazlasını Anlatır. In Arslan, M. (ed.), Kürt Sineması: Yurtsuzluk, Sınır ve Ölüm (pp. 241–4). Istanbul: Agora.Google Scholar
Şengül, A. F. (2013). Cinema, space and nation: The production of Doğu in cinema in Turkey. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Sheyholislami, J. (2010). Identity, language, and new media: The Kurdish case. Language Policy, 9 (4), 289312.Google Scholar
Şimşek, B. (2016). Lost voices of Kurdish cinema. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 9 (3), 352–69.Google Scholar
Şimşek, B. (2018). Kurdish cinema. In Günter, M. M. (ed.), Routledge Handbook on the Kurds (pp. 110–24). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Şimşek, B. and Jongerden, J. (2018). Gender revolution in Rojava: The voices beyond tabloid geopolitics. Geopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1531283.Google Scholar
Smets, K. (2015). Cinemas of conflict: A framework of cinematic engagement with violent conflict, illustrated with Kurdish cinema. International Journal of Communication, 9, 2434–55.Google Scholar
Smets, K. (2018). Ethnic identity without ethnic media? Diasporic cosmopolitanism, (social) media and distant conflict among young Kurds in London. The International Communication Gazette, 80 (7), 603–19.Google Scholar
Smets, K. and Akkaya, A. H. (2016). Media and violent conflict: Halil Dağ, Kurdish insurgency, and the hybridity of vernacular cinema of conflict. Media, War & Conflict, 9 (1), 7692.Google Scholar
Steyerl, H. (2009). The Wretched of the Screen. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
Suner, A. (1998). Specificities: Other cinemas speaking the experience of political oppression with a masculine voice: Making feminist sense of Yilmaz Guney’s Yol. Social Identities, 4 (2), 283300.Google Scholar
Toivanen, M. and Başer, B. (2016). Gender in the representation of an armed conflict. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 9, 294314.Google Scholar
Vali, A. (2003). Genealogies of the Kurds: Construction of nation and national identity in Kurdish historical writing. In Vali, A. (ed.), Essays on the Origins of Kurdish Nationalism (pp. 58105). Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers.Google Scholar
Yıldız, A. (2004). ‘Ne Mutlu Türküm Diyebilene’: Türk Ulusal Kimliğinin Etno-Seküler Sınırları (1919–1938). Istanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Yücel, M. (2008). Türk Sinemasında Kürtler. Istanbul: Agora.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×