Book contents
3 - Epistemologies of music theory
from PART I - DISCIPLINING MUSIC THEORY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Summary
“The epistemological underpinnings of Schenker’s theory,” writes Leslie Blasius, “are far from obvious.” Such a statement might well give his readers pause. After all, Blasius is talking about what must be the most widespread approach to the advanced analysis of the common-practice repertory today, and the doubt he is expressing goes to the heart of what Schenkerian analysis tells us: what sort of knowledge of music it gives us, what sort of truth it aspires to. And this of a theorist who devoted considerable attention to the underpinnings of his theory, for instance by carefully distinguishing those elements of music that he saw as given in nature from those that resulted from artifice, and thereby demarcating the province of the scientist from that of the music theorist. Most music-theoretical writing betrays few of Schenker’s epistemological qualms; Allen Forte’s The Structure of Atonal Music, to cite an example more or less at random, plunges straight into its topic in the same spirit of epistemological self-evidence that characterized the contemporary scientific writing on which Forte modeled both his literary and his theoretical approach. Like scientists, perhaps, music theorists address epistemological issues only when the truth-value of their work no longer seems self-evident to them. And if this is the case – if music-theoretical concern with epistemology is at root an expression of anxiety – then we have a fundamental problem in trying to unravel the epistemological underpinnings of music theory: when theorists are confident of the epistemological status of their work they will say nothing about it, whereas when they do talk about it we can deduce they are not quite sure about what they are saying.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory , pp. 78 - 106Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
“The Musical Theory and Philosophy of Robert Fludd,” Journal of the Warburg and Cortauld Institutes 13 (1967)Google Scholar
“Past and Present Concepts of the Nature and Limits of Music,” in Perspectives on Contemporary Music Theory, ed. and , New York, Norton, 1972Google Scholar
“The Structure and Function of Musical Theory,” in Perspectives on Contemporary Music Theory, ed. and , New York, Norton, 1972Google Scholar
“Twelve-tone Rhythmic Structure and the Electronic Medium,” in Perspectives on Contemporary Music Theory, ed. and , New York, Norton, 1972Google Scholar
“Momigny’s Type de la Musique and a Treatise in the Making,” in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past, ed. and , University of Chicago Press, 1993Google Scholar
“Symmetry and Symmetrical Inversion in Turn-of-the-Century Theory and Practice,” in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past, ed. and , University of Chicago Press, 1993Google Scholar
Schenker’s Argument and the Claims of Music Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “The Scientific Image of Music Theory,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 33 (1989)Google Scholar
“Musical and Intellectual Values: Interpreting the History of Tonal Theory,” Current Musicology 53 (1993)Google Scholar
“Introduction: Helmholtz at the Borders of Science,” in Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. , Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar
“Tonality: A Conflict of Forces,” in Music Theory in Concept and Practice, ed. , , and , University of Rochester Press, 1997Google Scholar
“Musical Consonance and Dissonance: A Cultural Criterion,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 4 (1945–46)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
review of Die Musiktheorie im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert: Grundzüge eine Systematik by , Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 1979– 10 (1988)Google Scholar
“Analysing Performance and Performing Analysis,” in Rethinking Music, ed. and , Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar
“Music Theory and ‘Good Comparison’: A Viennese Perspective,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 33 (1989)Google Scholar
“Perception: A Perspective from Music Theory,” in Musical Perceptions, ed. , New York, Oxford University Press, 1994Google Scholar
“The Perception of Large-scale Tonal Closure,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 5 (1987)Google Scholar
Die Musiktheorie im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert: Grundzüge eine Systematik, Geschichte der Musiktheorie, 10 of 15 vols. to date, ed. , Staatliches Institut fr Musikforschung Preussischer Kulturbesitz Berlin, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgessellschaft, 1984– 10 (1984)Google Scholar
Studies on the Origin of Harmonic Tonality, trans. , Princeton University Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“ ‘When You Are a Beethoven’: Kinds of Rules in Schenker’s Counterpoint,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 34 (1990)Google Scholar
“Composer, Theorist, Composer/Theorist,” in Rethinking Music, ed. and , Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar
“Criteria of Correctness in Music Theory and Analysis,” in Theory, Analysis and Meaning in Music, ed. , Cambridge University Press, 1994Google Scholar
Heinrich Schenker als Essayer und Kritiker: Gesammelte Aufsätze, Rezensionen und kleinere Berichte aus den Jahren 1891–1901, Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1985Google Scholar
The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans. anon., London, Tavistock, 1970Google Scholar
“An Experimental Music Theory?,” in Rethinking Music, ed. and , Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar
“Rehabilitating the Incorrigible,” in Theory, Analysis and Meaning in Music, ed. , Cambridge University Press, 1994Google Scholar
On the Musically Beautiful: A Contribution towards the Revision of the Aesthetics of Music, 8th edn. (1891), trans. , Indianapolis, Hackett, 1986Google Scholar
“Helmholtz and Classicism: the Science of Aesthetics and Aesthetic of Science,” in Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. , Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar
“Force, Law, and Experiment: The Evolution of Hemholtz’s Philosophy of Science,” in Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. , Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar
On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, (4th edn., 1877), trans. , New York, Dover, 1954Google Scholar
Musicology, London, Fontana, 1985; American edn. Contemplating Music, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1985Google Scholar
“Calculating Tonal Tension,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 13 (1996)Google Scholar
“Cognitive Constraints on Compositional Systems,” in Generative Processes in Music: the Psychology of Performance, Improvisation, and Composition, ed. , Oxford University Press, 1988Google Scholar
“Tonal Pitch Space,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 5 (1988)Google Scholar
“Music Theory, Phenomenology, and Modes of Perception,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 3 (1986)Google Scholar
“Musical Analysis as Stage Direction,” in Music and Text: Critical Inquiries, ed. , Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar
The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1948Google Scholar
Musical Form in the Age of Beethoven: Selected Writings on Theory and Method, ed. and trans. , Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Cours complet d’harmonie et de composition, 3 vols., Paris, Momigny and Bailleul, 1803–06Google Scholar
and , “The Perceptual Roles of Melodic Process, Contour, and Form,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 4 (1986)Google Scholar
review of A Generative Theory of Tonal Music by and , Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 2 (1984)Google Scholar
“The ‘New Education’ and Music Theory, 1900–1925,” in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past, ed. and , University of Chicago Press, 1993Google Scholar
“The Americanization of Schenker,” in Schenker Studies, ed. , Cambridge University Press, 1990Google Scholar
“Forces, Containers, and Paths: The Role of Body-Derived Image Schemas in the Conceptualization of Music,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 40 (1996)Google Scholar
The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture, London, Routledge, 1995Google Scholar
“A ‘Cumulative” Method of Quantifying Tonal Consonance in Musical Key Contexts,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 15 (1997)Google Scholar
“Musical Form and Fundamental Structure: An Investigation of Schenker’s Formenlehre,” Music Analysis 15 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Does Formal Musical Structure Affect Perception of Musical Expressiveness?,” Psychology of Music 24 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Sensation of Tone, Perception of Sound, and Empiricism: Helmholtz’s Psychological Acoustics,” in Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. , Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar
and , “Riemann’s ‘Ideen zu einer “Lehre von Tonvorstellungen” ’: An Annotated Translation,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 36 (1992)Google Scholar
“Conceptual Models and Cross-domain Mapping: New Perspectives on Theories of Music and Hierarchy,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 41 (1997)Google Scholar
- 49
- Cited by