Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T08:25:19.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

43 - Global health ethics and cross-cultural considerations in bioethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Solomon R. Benatar
Affiliation:
Professor University of Toronto
Peter A. Singer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
A. M. Viens
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

The AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 076 (ACTG 076) made an important contribution to prevention of HIV infection when it established that mother-to-child transmission of HIV (MTCT) in the USA and France could be significantly reduced by giving antiretroviral drugs to pregnant women orally for 8 weeks or more prior to childbirth (median 14 weeks) and intravenously during labor, as well as to the newborn child for 6 weeks in the absence of breast feeding (Connor et al., 1994). A major controversy developed when in subsequent studies of MTCT in developing countries shorter courses of treatment were compared with placebo. Although there is no reason to believe that the ACTG 076 regimen would not work in developing countries if it could be applied, placebo studies were undertaken instead. The rationale was that use of the ACTG 076 regimen was precluded in developing countries, not only by its extremely high cost but, more relevantly, because women do not present early enough in pregnancy to receive this prolonged and intensive regimen. In addition they are anemic and malnourished, unable to stop breast feeding, and have difficulty providing treatment to a child for a six-week period (Varmus and Satcher, 1997). Consequently, cheaper and more easily applied preventive methods needed to be studied to enable rapid application of this preventive method to save many lives in developing countries.

What is global health ethics?

Global health ethics is a suggested means through which to promote widely values that include meaningful respect for human life, human rights, equity, freedom, democracy, environmental sustainability, and solidarity (Benatar et al., 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashcroft, R. E. (2005). Making sense of dignity. J Med Ethics 31: 679–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, T. L. (2003). A defense of the common morality. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 13: 259–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benatar, S. R. (1998). Global disparities in health and human rights. Am J Public Health 88: 295–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benatar, S. R. (2001). Health in developing countries. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 6566–70.Google Scholar
Benatar, S. R. (2002). Some reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Soc Sci Med 54: 1131–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benatar, S. R. (2004a). Towards progress in resolving dilemmas in international research ethics. J Law Med Ethics 32: 574–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, S. R. (2004b). Rationally defensible standards for research in developing countries. Review of “Double Standards in Medical Research in Developing Countries” by Ruth Macklin, Cambridge University Press. Health Human Rights 8: 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, S. R., Daar, A. S., and Singer, P. A. (2003). Global health ethics: the rationale for mutual caring. Int Affairs 79: 101–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensimon, C. A. and Benatar, S. R. (2006). Developing sustainability: a new metaphor for progress. Theor Med Bioethics 27: 59–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, J. T. (1998). Culture and ethnicity in clinical care. Arch Intern Med 158: 2085–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, C. M., Matukas, L. M., Tomlinson, G. A., et al. (2003). Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 144 patients with SARS in the greater Toronto area. JAMA 289: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowman, K. (2004). What are the limits of bioethics in a culturally pluralistic society?J Law Med Ethics 32: 664–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christakis, N. A. (1992). Ethics are local: engaging cross-cultural variations in the ethics for clinical research. Soc Sci Med 35: 1079–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, E., Sperling, R., Gelber, R., et al. (1994). Reduction of maternal–infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. N Engl J Med 331: 1173–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeGrazia, D. (2003). Common morality, coherence, and the principles of biomedical ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 13: 219–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, M., Thompson, M., and Verweij, M. (2003). Is time running out? The case of global warming. Daedalus Spring: 98–107.Google Scholar
Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need.London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogarty International Center (2005). International Research Ethics Education and Curriculum Development Award. http://www.fic.nih.gov/programs/training_grants/ bioethics/index.htm. Accessed June 2007.
Fox, R. C. and Swazey, J. (1985). Medical morality is not bioethics: medical ethics in China and the United States. Perspect Biol Med 27: 337–60.Google Scholar
Fox, R. C. and Swazey, J. P. (2005). Examining American bioethics: its problems and perspectives. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 14: 361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, J. (2001). Humanity: a Moral History of the 20th Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Helman, C. G. (1990). Culture, Health and Illness, 2nd edn. London: Butterworth–Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hinman, L. M. (2006). Internet philosophical sources on moral relativism. Ethics Updates (http://ethics.sandiego.edu/theories/Relativism) accessed 26 July 2006.
Hoffmeister, B. (1990). Morality and the social sciences. In Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics, ed. Weisz, G. W.. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 241–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, R. (1995). African traditional thought and Western science. In African Philosophy, ed. Mosely, A.. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 310–38.Google Scholar
Kaiser Network (2006). Global Challenges: Life Expectancy in Sub-Saharan Africa Decreases. http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports-rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=38068. Accessed 26 July 2006.
Lee, N., Hui, D., Wu, A., et al. (2003). A major outbreak of severe respiratory distress syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 348: 1986–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieban, R. W. (1990). Medical anthropology and the comparative study of medical ethics. In Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics, ed. Weisz, G. W.. Dordrecht the Nehtherlands: Kluwer, pp. 221–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, A. J. (2000). The ambiguity and the exigency: clarifying ‘standard of care’ arguments in international research. J Med Philos 25: 379–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
London, A. J. (2001). Equipoise and international human-subjects research. Bioethics 15: 312–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loue, S., Okello, D., and Kawama, M. (1996). Research bioethics in the Ugandan context. J Law Med Ethics 24: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macklin, R. (1999). Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. A. (1992). Anthropology and bioethics. Med Anthropol Q 6: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, P. and Koenig, B. (2004). Accounting for culture in a globalized bioethics. J Law Med Ethics 32: 252–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nairn, T. (1998). The use of Zairian children in HIV vaccine experimentation: a cross-cultural study in medical ethics. In On Moral Medicine, 2nd edn, ed. Lammers, S. and Verhey, A.. Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans, pp. 919–31.Google Scholar
Nixon, S., Upshur, R., Robertson, A., et al. (2005). Public health ethics. In Public Health and Law Policy in Canada, ed. Ries, N., Caulfield, T., Bailey, T.. Toronto: Lexis Nexis, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, K. and Benatar, S. R. (2005). HIV prevention research and global inequality: towards improved standards of care. J Med Ethics 31: 39–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, P. (2002). One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. A., Benatar, S. R., Bernstein, P., et al. (2003). Ethics and SARS: lessons from Toronto. BMJ 327: 1342–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smart, N. (1995). Worldviews: Cross-cultural Explorations of Human Beliefs, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Sugarman, J. and Sulmasy, D. P. (eds.) (2001). Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tangwa, G. (2000). The traditional African perception of a person: some implications for bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep 30: 39–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tangwa, G. (2002). International regulations and medical research in developing countries: double standards or differing standards?. Notizie di Politeia XVIII: 46–50.Google Scholar
Turner, L. (2003). Zones of consensus and zones of conflict: questioning the “common morality” presumption in bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 13: 193–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varmus, H. and Satcher, D. (1997). Ethical complexities of conducting research in developing countries. N Engl J Med 337: 1003–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisz, G. W. (ed.) (1990). Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 221–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×