Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T09:02:37.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Voluntariness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Mary Jane Dykeman
Affiliation:
Barrister & Solicitor York University
Kate Dewhirst
Affiliation:
Legal Counsel Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care 3560 Bathurst St Toronto, ON M6A 2E1 Canada
Peter A. Singer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
A. M. Viens
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Mr. F is a 59-year-old taxi driver who has been admitted to hospital with severe iron-deficiency anemia. After his condition is stabilized by means of a blood transfusion, and an endoscopy is ordered, the attending physician tells Mr. F that he will “have a test” because “he must be bleeding from the bowel.” As he is being wheeled down the hall to the endoscopy suite, the physician calls out: “You have to have this test before you can go home.” The endoscopist arrives at the same time as Mr. F.

Ms. G is a 38-year-old mother of two young children. She is an outpatient at a mental health facility where she is finishing up a program for an addiction to painkillers. She is in the midst of a bitter custody battle with her former husband, who is insisting that she sign a consent form to release her health records to him for the purpose of the custody hearing. She is scared that her husband may try to use the information against her, and that she will lose her children. Nevertheless, her social worker has told her she needs to accept responsibility for her addiction and the only way to do that is to share all details of her treatment with her husband.

What is voluntariness?

In the context of consent, “voluntariness” refers to a patient's right to make treatment decisions and decisions about his or her personal information free of any undue influence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beausoleil v. Sisters of Charity (1966) 56 DLR 65 (Que CA).
Connelly, J. E. and Campbell, C. (1987). Patients who refuse treatment in medical offices. Arch Intern Med 47: 1829–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etchells, E., Sharpe, G., Walsh, P. et al. (1999). Consent. In Bioethics at the Bedside: A Clinician's Guide, ed. Singer, P. A.. Ottawa: CMAJ, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Faden, R. R. and Beauchamp, T. L. (1986). A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson v. Hamilton Civic Hospitals et al., [1983] 23 CCLT 254.
Fernie, G. (2005). Consent and the individual detained in custody. Med Law 24: 515–23.Google ScholarPubMed
General Medical Council (1998). Seeking Patients' Consent: the Ethical Considerations. London: General Medical Council (http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/library/consent.asp#ensuring).
Health Protection and Promotion Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. H.7. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health.
Hewison, A. (1995). Nurses' power in interactions with patients, J Adv Nurs 21: 75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuczewski, M. and McCruden, P. J. (2001). Informed consent: does it take a village? The problem of culture and truth telling. Camb Q Health Ethics 10: 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, E. J. and Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. J Pers Soc Psychol 34: 191–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, D. J. and Hickam, D. H. (1994). The effect of physicians' explanations on patients' treatment preferences. Med Decis Making 14: 255–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, S. H. and Meyers, R. (1994). Untying the elderly: 1989 to 1993 update. Clin Geriatr Med 10: 513–25.Google ScholarPubMed
New Zealand Ministry of Health (1998). Consent in Child and Youth Health: Information for Practitioners. Wellington: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
Picard, E. and Robertson, G. (1996). Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals in Canada, 3rd edn. Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
Redelmeier, P. A., Rozin, P., and Kahneman, D. (1993). Understanding patients' decisions: cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA 270: 72–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Re Dueck [1999] 171 D.L.R. (4th) 761 (Sask. Q.B.).
Re E (1993) 1 FLR 386.
Re T [1992] 4 All ER 649.
Reed, S. C. and Lewis, D. A. (1990). The negotiation of involuntary admission in Chicago's state mental hospitals. J Psychiatr Law 18: 137–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A. (1993). Coercion and “voluntary” admission: an examination of psychiatric patient views. Behav Sci Law 11: 259–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, D., Kleinman, I., and Harvey, W. (2005). Informed Consent and Adolescents. Can J Psychiatry 50: 534–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheline, Y. and Nelson, T. (1993). Patient choice: deciding between psychotropic medication and physical restraints in an emergency. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 21: 321–9.Google Scholar
Sutherland, H. J., Lockwood, G. A., Tritchler, D. L., et al. (1991). Communicating probabilistic information to cancer patients: Is there “noise” on the line?Soc Sci Med 32: 725–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK Department of Health (2001). Reference Guide to the Consent for Examination or Treatment. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
White, S. M. and Baldwin, T. J. (2003). Consent for anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 58L: 760–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Voluntariness
    • By Mary Jane Dykeman, Barrister & Solicitor York University, Kate Dewhirst, Legal Counsel Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care 3560 Bathurst St Toronto, ON M6A 2E1 Canada
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Voluntariness
    • By Mary Jane Dykeman, Barrister & Solicitor York University, Kate Dewhirst, Legal Counsel Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care 3560 Bathurst St Toronto, ON M6A 2E1 Canada
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Voluntariness
    • By Mary Jane Dykeman, Barrister & Solicitor York University, Kate Dewhirst, Legal Counsel Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care 3560 Bathurst St Toronto, ON M6A 2E1 Canada
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.006
Available formats
×