Antolisei, Francesco, Il Rapporto di Causalità nel Diritto Penale (Padua 1934)Google Scholar

Beauchamp, Tom L and Rosenberg, Alexander, Hume and the Problem of Causation (OUP 1981)Google Scholar

Becht, Arno C and Miller, Frank W, The Test of Factual Causation in Negligence and Strict Liability Cases (Washington University Studies 1961)Google Scholar

Beebee, Helen, Hitchcock, Christopher and Menzies, Peter (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Causation (OUP 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benitah, Marc, The Law of Subsidies under the GATT/WTO System (Kluwer 2001)Google Scholar

Bhandari, Jagdeep S and Sykes, Alan O (eds), Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases: A Reply to Professor Sykes, Economic Dimensions in International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives (CUP 1997)Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P, Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement (Brookings Institution Press 2009)Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P and Pauwelyn, Joost, The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (CUP 2010)Google Scholar

Cane, Peter, Responsibility in Law and Morality (OUP 1950)Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science (CUP 1999)Google Scholar

Choi, EK and Hartigan, J (eds), Handbook of International Trade, Volume II (Blackwell 2005)Google Scholar

Cumming, Geoff and Calin-Jageman, Robert, Introduction to the New Statistics: Estimation, Open Science, and Beyond (Routledge 2017)Google Scholar

Engisch, Karl, Die Kausalität als Merkmal der strafrechtlichen Tatbestände (Tübingen 1931)Google Scholar

Field, Andy, Miles, Jeremy and Field, Zoë, Discovering Statistics Using R (Sage 2012)Google Scholar

Goldberg, Richard (ed), Perspectives on Causation (Hart 2011)Google Scholar

Gruszczynski, Lukasz, Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law: A Critical Analysis of the SPS Agreement (OUP 2010)Google Scholar

Hart, HLA and Honoré, Tony, Causation in the Law (2nd edn, OUP 1985)Google Scholar

Hinton, Perry, Statistics Explained (3rd edn, Routledge 2014)Google Scholar

Huerta-Goldman, Jorge A, Romaneti, Antoine and Stirnimann, Franz X (eds), WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration and Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer 2013)Google Scholar

Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (Selby-Bigge, LA ed, 3rd edn, OUP 1975)Google Scholar

Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature (1789) (Selby-Bigge, LA ed, revised by PH Nidditch, 2nd edn, OUP 1975)Google Scholar

Jansen, Marion, Pauwelyn, Joost and Carpenter, Theresa, The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes (CUP 2017)Google Scholar

JohnstonJr, CR (ed and comp), Law and Practice of United States Regulation of International Trade (Oceana Publications 1989)Google Scholar

Kahmen, Benedikt and Stepanians, Markus (eds), Critical Essays on Causation and Responsibility (Walter de Gruyter 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason (Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W tr and ed, CUP 1998)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel,Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason (Hatfield, Gary tr and ed, CUP 1997)Google Scholar

Keeton, Robert, Legal Cause in the Law of Torts (Ohio State UP 1963)Google Scholar

Leonhard, Franz, Die Kausalität als Erklärung durch Ergänzun (W Schmitz 1946)Google Scholar

Lewis, David, Counterfactuals (Blackwell 1973)Google Scholar

Lewis, David,On the Plurality of Worlds (Blackwell 1986)Google Scholar

Lexis, Wilhelm, Zur theorie der massenerscheinungen in der menschlichen gesellschaft (W Schmitz 1877)Google Scholar

Mackie, John L, The Cement of the Universe (OUP 1974)Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C, Messerlin, Patrick A and Wauters, M, The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO (Edward Elgar 2008)Google Scholar

Michotte, Albert, La Perception de la causalité (Louvain 1954)Google Scholar

Mill, JS, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive (Robson, JM ed, Routledge 1973)Google Scholar

Moore, Michael S, Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics (OUP 2009)Google Scholar

Moosa, Imad, Econometrics as a Con Art: Exposing the Limitations and Abuses of Econometrics (Edward Elgar 2017)Google Scholar

Murphy, Kevin R, Myors, Brett and Wolach, Allen, Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests (4th edn, Routledge 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nedumpara, James J, Injury and Causation in Trade Remedy Law: A Study of WTO Law and Country Practices (Springer 2016)Google Scholar

Owen, David G (ed), The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (OUP 1997)Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea, Causality, Models, Reasoning, and Inference (CUP 2000)Google Scholar

Perkins, Rollin M, Criminal Law (2nd edn, Foundation Press 1969)Google Scholar

Piérola, Fernando, The Challenge of Safeguards in the WTO (CUP 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prosser, William Lloyd et al, Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts (5th edn, West Publishing 1984)Google Scholar

Stoll, Hans, Kausalzusammenhang und Normzweck im Deliktsrecht (Tubingen 1968)Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O, The WTO Safeguards Agreement: A Commentary (OUP 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tharakan, PKM (ed), Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures (Elsevier Science Publishers 1991)Google Scholar

Trendelenburg, Friedrich Adolf, Logische Untersuchungen (S Hirzel 1870)Google Scholar

Van Bael & Bellis, EU AD and Other Trade Defence Instruments (6th edn, Wolters Kluwer 2019)Google Scholar

Vigen, Tyler, Spurious Correlations (Hachette Books 2015)Google Scholar

Williams, Glanville, Joint Torts and Contributory Negligence (Stevens 1951)Google Scholar

Yan, Xin and Su, Xiao Gang, Linear Regression Analysis: Theory and Computing (World Scientific 2009)Google Scholar

Ahn, Dukgeun and Moon, William J, ‘Alternative Approach to Causation Analysis in Trade Remedy Investigations: “Cost of Production” Test’ (2010) 44(5) JWT 1023Google Scholar

Anderson, Kym, ‘Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2000) 1(2) WTR 123Google Scholar

van Anken, Anne, ‘Opportunities for and Limits to an Economic Analysis of International Law’ (2001) 3(1) Transnatl Corp Rev 27Google Scholar

Balistreri, Edward, Mavroidis, Petros C and Prusa, Thomas J, ‘What If? Tinkering with the Counterfactual: A Comment on US—Washing Machines (Article 22.6—US)’ (2020) EUI Working Papers (RSCAs 2020/50) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Global Governance Programme–405 <https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/67092> accessed 1 June 2022+accessed+1+June+2022>Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘The Chapeau of the General Exceptions in the WTO GATT and GATS Agreements: A Reconstruction’ (2015) 109(1) AJIL 105Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand,‘Procedural Aspects of Shared Responsibility in the WTO Dispute Settlement System’ (2013) 4(2) J Int Disput Settl 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benitah, Marc, ‘From Economic Complexity to Legal Indeterminacy: Causality between Subsidy and Injury’ (1999) 33(1) JWT 87Google Scholar

Boltuck, Richard D, ‘An Economic Analysis of Dumping’ (1987) 21(5) JWT 45Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P, ‘Why Are Safeguards under the WTO So Unpopular?’ (2002) 47 WTR 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calabresi, Guido, ‘Concerning Cause and the Law of Torts’ (1975–76) 43 U Chi L Rev 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy, ‘One Word, Many Things’ (2002) 71(5) Phil Sci 805Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions’ (2001) 95 AJIL 792CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fetzer, James J, ‘Inference for Econometric Modelling in Antidumping, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Investigations’ (2009) 8(4) WTR 545Google Scholar

Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, Arevik and Damme, Isabelle Van, ‘Expired Measures, Excess Duty Drawbacks and Causation: The Appellate Body Report in EU–PET (Pakistan)’ (2020) 19 WTR 232Google Scholar

Goertzel, Ted, ‘Myths of Murder and Multiple Regression’ (2002) 26(1) The Skeptical Inquirer 19Google Scholar

Green, Leon, ‘The Wagon Mound No. 2: Foreseeability Revised’ (1967) 2 Utah LR 197Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene, ‘Imports as a Cause of Injury: The Case of the US Steel Industry’ (1986) 20 J Int Econ 201Google Scholar

Hausman, Daniel M, ‘Essay Review: Physical Causation’ (2002) 33 Stud Hist Philos 717Google Scholar

Horn, Heinrik and Mavroidis, Petros C, ‘US – Lamb: United States – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Fresh, Chilled or Frozen Lamb Meat from New Zealand and Australia: What Should Be Required of a Safeguard Investigation?’ (2003) 2(3) WTR 395Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A, ‘Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in US Section 201 Cases’ (2003) 2(3) WTR 297Google Scholar

Kaye, David H, ‘Is Proof of Statistical Significance Relevant?’ (1986) 61 Wash L Rev 1333Google Scholar

Kelly, Kenneth, ‘The Analysis of Causality in Escape Clause Cases’ (1988) 37(2) J Ind Econ 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacey, Simon, ‘Causal Link, Non-Attribution and Contingency Protection in the WTO’ (December 2002) Working Paper, 37, <https://ssrn.com/abstract=1135133> accessed 3 November 2017+accessed+3+November+2017>Google Scholar

Lewis, David, ‘Causation’ (1973) 70 J Phil 556Google Scholar

Leys, David, ‘Does a Theory of Causation Exist under the WTO Safeguards Agreement?’ (2014) 9(1) GTCJ 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, JL, ‘Causes and Conditions’ (1965) 2 Am Phil Q 245Google Scholar

Mah, Jai, ‘Injury and Causation in the WTO Agreement on Safeguards’ (2001) J World Intellect Prop 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAller, Michael, Pagan, Adrian and Volker, Paul, ‘What Will Take the Con Out of Econometrics?’ (1985) 75(3) Am Econ Rev 293Google Scholar

Messenger, Gregory, ‘The Development of International Law and the Role of Causal Language’ (2016) 36(1) Oxford J Legal Stud 110Google Scholar

Miranda, Jorge, ‘Causal Link and Non-Attribution as Interpreted in WTO Trade Remedy Disputes’ (2010) 44(4) JWT 729Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew and Prusa, Thomas, ‘China – Autos: Haven’t We Danced This Dance Before?’ (2016) 15(2) WTR 303Google Scholar

Moosa, Imad, ‘Blaming Suicide on NASA and Divorce on Margarine: The Hazard of Using Cointegration to Derive Inference on Spurious Correlation’ (2017) 49(15) Appl Econ 1483Google Scholar

Morke, ME and Kruth, HE, ‘Determining Whether Dumped or Subsidised Imports Injure Domestic Injuries’ (1989) 7 Contemp Pol Issues 78Google Scholar

Narayanan, Prakash, ‘Injury Investigations in “Material Retardation” Antidumping Cases’ (2004) 25(1) Nw J Int’l L & Bus 37Google Scholar

Nedumpara, James J, ‘Causation in Trade Remedy Actions: Problems with the “But For” Test’ (2015) 10(11) GTCJ 402Google Scholar

Pindyck, Robert S and Rotemberg, Julio J, ‘Are Imports to Blame? Attribution of Injury under the 1974 Trade Act’ (1987) 30 J Law & Econ 101Google Scholar

Prusa, Thomas J and Sharp, David C, ‘Simultaneous Equations in Antidumping Investigations’ (2001) 14(1) JFE 63Google Scholar

Robinson, JA, ‘Hume’s Two Definitions of “Cause”’ (1962) 12(47) Phil Q 162Google Scholar

Rue, John D, ‘Returning to the Roots of Bramble Bush: The “But for” Test Regains Primacy in Causal Analysis in the American Law Institute’s Proposed Restatement (Third) of Torts’ (2003) 71(6) Fordham L Rev 2679Google Scholar

Sapir, Andrew and Trachtman, Joel P, ‘Subsidization, Price Suppression, and Expertise: Causation and Precision in Upland Cotton’ (2008) 7(1) WTR 183Google Scholar

Schaffer, Jonathan, ‘Contrastive Causation in the Law’ (2010) 16 Legal Theory 259Google Scholar

Scheines, Richard, ‘Causation, Truth and the Law’ (2008) 73(2) Brooklyn L Rev 625Google Scholar

Sharp, David and Zantow, Kenneth, ‘Attribution of Injury in the Shrimp Antidumping Case: A Simultaneous Equations Approach’ (2005) 6 Econ Bull 1Google Scholar

Sikes, Devin, ‘The Need for New Causation Standards in Antidumping, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Actions’ (2010) 7(1) Manch J Int Econ Law 39Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremiah, ‘Legal Cause in Actions in Tort’ (1911–12) 25 Harvard L Rev 103Google Scholar

Spamann, Holger, ‘The Myth of “Rebalancing” Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice’ (2006) 9 JIEL 31Google Scholar

Steinberg, Richard H and Josling, Timothy E, ‘When the Peace Ends: The Vulnerability of EC and US Agricultural Subsidies to WTO Legal Challenge’ (2003) 6(2) JIEL 369Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O, ‘The Economics of Injury in Antidumping Countervailing Duty Investigations’ (1996) 16(1) Int Rev Law Econ 5Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O,‘The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’ (2003) University of Chicago John M Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No 186 <https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1515&context=law_and_economics> accessed 22 May 2019+accessed+22+May+2019>Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O,‘The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence’ (2003) 2(3) WTR 261Google Scholar

Tayal, Pratik, ‘A New World of Causation in Safeguards: Application of the “But for” Test’ (2015) 10(1) GTCJ 355Google Scholar

Tintner, Gerhard, ‘The Definition of Econometrics’ (1953) 21(1) Econometrica 31Google Scholar

Williams, Glanville, ‘Causation in the Law’ (1961) 19(1) Camb LJ 62Google Scholar

Wright, Richard W, ‘Causation in Tort Law’ (1985) 73(6) California L Rev 1735Google Scholar

Honoré, Antony, ‘Causation in the Law’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter edn, 2010) <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/causation-law/> accessed 26 September 2015+accessed+26+September+2015>Google Scholar

Moore, Michael, ‘Causation in the Law’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall edn, 2019) <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-law/> accessed 10 August 2021+accessed+10+August+2021>Google Scholar

Vigen, Tyler, ‘Spurious Correlations’ Tyler Vigen <www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations> accessed 14 September 2021+accessed+14+September+2021>Google Scholar