Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T06:18:42.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Free Streamline Flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

Christopher Earls Brennen
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter we briefly survey the extensive literature on fully developed cavity flows and the methods used for their solution. The terms “free streamline flow” or “free surface flow” are used for those situations that involve a “free” surface whose location is initially unknown and must be found as a part of the solution. In the context of some of the multiphase flow literature, they would be referred to as separated flows. In the introduction to Chapter 6 we described the two asymptotic states of a multiphase flow, homogeneous and separated flow. Chapter 6 described some of the homogeneous flow methods and their application to cavitating flows; this chapter presents the other approach. However, we shall not use the term separated flow in this context because of the obvious confusion with the accepted, fluid mechanical use of the term.

Fully developed cavity flows constitute one subset of free surface flows, and this survey is intended to provide information on some of the basic properties of these flows as well as the methods that have been used to generate analytical solutions of them. A number of excellent reviews of free streamline methods can be found in the literature, including those of Birkkoff and Zarantonello (1957), Parkin (1959), Gilbarg (1960), Woods (1961), Gurevich (1961), Sedov (1966), and Wu (1969,1972). Here we shall follow the simple and elegant treatment of Wu (1969,1972).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerberg, R.C. (1970). Boundary layer separation at a free streamline. Part 1. Two-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech., 44, 211–225.Google Scholar
Ackerberg, R.C. (1975). The effects of capillarity on free streamline separation. J. Fluid Mech., 70, 333–352.Google Scholar
Acosta, A.J. (1955). A note on partial cavitation of flat plate hydrofoils. Calif. Inst. of Tech. Hydro. Lab. Rep. E-19.9.
Acosta, A.J. (1960). Cavitating flow past a cascade of circular arc hydrofoils. Calif. Inst. of Tech. Hydro. Lab. Rep. E-79.2.
Acosta, A.J. (1973). Hydrofoils and hydrofoil craft. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 5, 161–184.Google Scholar
Acosta, A.J. and Hollander, A. (1959). Remarks on cavitation in turbomachines. Calif. Inst. of Tech. Eng. Div. Rep. No. 79. 3
Acosta, A.J. and DeLong, R.K. (1971). Experimental investigation of non-steady forces on hydrofoils oscillating in heave. Proc. IUTAM Symp. on non-steady flow of water at high speeds, Leningrad, USSR, 95–104.
Ai, D.K. (1966). The wall effect in cavity flows. ASME J. Basic Eng., 88, 132–138.Google Scholar
Arakeri, V.H. (1975). Viscous effects on the position of cavitation separation from smooth bodies. J. Fluid Mech., 68, 779–799.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.H. (1953). Abrupt and smooth separation in plane and axisymmetric flow. Memo. Arm. Res. Est., G.B., No.22/63.
Armstrong, A.H. and Dunham, J.H. (1953). Axisymmetric cavity flow. Rep. Res. Est., G.B., No. 12/53.
Armstrong, A.H. and Tadman, K.G. (1954). Axisymmetric cavity flow about ellipsoids. Proc. Joint Admiralty-U.S.Navy Meeting on Hydroballistics.
Betz, A. and Petersohn, E. (1931). Application of the theory of free jets. NACA TM No. 667.
Biot, M.A. (1942). Some simplified methods in airfoil theory. J. Aero. Sci., 9, No. 5, 185–190.Google Scholar
Birkhoff, G. and Zarantonello, E.H. (1957). Jets, wakes, and cavities. Academic Press.
Brennen, C. (1969a). A numerical solution of axisymmetric cavity flows. J. Fluid Mech., 37, 671–688.Google Scholar
Brennen, C. (1969b). Some viscous and other real fluid effects in fully developed cavity flows. In Cavitation State of Knowledge (eds: J.M., RobertsonG.F., Wislicenus), ASME, N.Y.
Brennen, C. (1970). Some cavitation experiments with dilute polymer solutions. J. Fluid Mech., 44, 51–63.Google Scholar
Brennen, C.E. and Acosta, A.J. (1973). Theoretical, quasistatic analysis of cavitation compliance in turbopumps. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 10, No. 3, 175–180.Google Scholar
Brennen, C.E., Oey, K., and Babcock, C.D. (1980). On the leading edge flutter of cavitating hydrofoils. J. Ship Res., 24, No. 3, 135–146.Google Scholar
Brillouin, M. (1911). Les surfaces de glissement de Helmholtz et la résistance des fluides. Ann. Chim. Phys., 23, 145–230.Google Scholar
Churchill, R.V. (1948). Introduction to complex variables and applications. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Cohen, H. and Gilbert, R. (1957). Two-dimensional, steady, cavity flow about slender bodies in channels of finite width. ASME J. Appl. Mech., 24, 170–176.Google Scholar
Cohen, H., Sutherland, C.D., and Tu, Y-O. (1957). Wall effects in cavitating hydrofoil flow. J. Ship Res., 1, No. 3, 31–39.Google Scholar
Cumberbatch, E. and Wu, T.Y. (1961) Cavity flow past a slender pointed hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech., 11, 187–208.Google Scholar
Deshpande, M., Feng, J., and Merkle, C. (1993). Navier-Stokes analysis of 2-D cavity flows. ASME Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, FED-153, 149–155.Google Scholar
Duller, G.A. (1966). On the linear theory of cascades of supercavitating hydrofoils. U.K. Nat. Eng. Lab. Rep. No. 218.
Efros, D.A. (1946). Hydrodynamical theory of two-dimensional flow with cavitation. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 51, 267–270.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, P. and Pond, H.L. (1948). Water tunnel investigations of steady state cavities. David Taylor Model Basin Rep. No. 668.
Fabula, A.G. (1962). Thin airfoil theory applied to hydrofoils with a single finite cavity and arbitrary free-streamline detachment. J. Fluid Mech., 12, 227–240.Google Scholar
Fabula, A.G. (1964). Choked flow about vented or cavitating hydrofoils. ASME J. Basic Eng., 86, 561–568.Google Scholar
Fage, A. and Johansen, F.C. (1927). On the flow of air behind an inclined flat plate of infinite span. Proc. Roy. Soc., London, Series A, 116, 170–197.Google Scholar
Franc, J.P. and Michel, J.M. (1985). Attached cavitation and the boundary layer: experimental investigation and numerical treatment. J. Fluid Mech., 154, 63–90.Google Scholar
Furuya, O. and Acosta, A.J. (1973). A note on the calculation of supercavitating hydrofoils with rounded noses. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 95, 222–228.Google Scholar
Furuya, O. (1974). Supercavitating linear cascades with rounded noses. ASME J. Basic Eng., SeriesD, 96, 35–42.Google Scholar
Furuya, O. (1975a). Exact supercavitating cascade theory. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 97, 419–429.Google Scholar
Furuya, O. (1975b). Three-dimensional theory on supercavitating hydrofoils near a free surface. J. Fluid Mech., 71, 339–359.Google Scholar
Garabedian, P.R. (1956). The mathematical theory of three-dimensional cavities and jets. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 62, 219–235.Google Scholar
Gilbarg, D. (1949). A generalization of the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation. Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 35, 609–612.Google Scholar
Gilbarg, D. (1960). Jets and cavities. In Handbuch der Physik, Springer-Verlag, 9, 311–445.
Gurevich, M.I. (1961). Theory of jets in ideal fluids. Academic Press, N.Y. (1965).
Ham, N.D. (1968). Aerodynamic loading on a two-dimensional airfoil during dynamic stall. AIAA J., 6, 1927–1934.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. (1868). Über diskontinuierliche Flüssigkeitsbewegungen. Monatsber. Akad. Wiss., Berlin, 23, 215–228.Google Scholar
Hsu, C.C. (1972). On flow past a supercavitating cascade of cambered blades. ASME J. Basic Eng., SeriesD, 94, 163–168.Google Scholar
Hsu, E.-Y. and Perry, B. (1954). Water tunnel experiments on spheres in cavity flow. Calif. Inst. of Tech. Hydro. Lab. Rep. No.E-24.9.
Johnson, V.E. (1961). Theoretical and experimental investigation of supercavitating hydro-foils operating near the free surface. NASA TR R-93.
Joukowski, N.E. (1890). I. A modification of Kirchhoff's method of determining a two-dimensional motion of a fluid given a constant velocity along an unknown streamline. II. Determination of the motion of a fluid for any condition given on a streamline. Mat. Sbornik (Rec. Math.), 15, 121–278.Google Scholar
Kelly, H.R. (1967). An extension of the Woods theory for unsteady cavity flows. ASME J. Basic Eng., 89, 798–806.Google Scholar
Kinnas, S.A. and Fine, N.E. (1990). Non-linear analysis of the flow around partially or super-cavitating hydrofoils on a potential based panel method. Proc. IABEM-90 Symp. Int. Assoc. for Boundary Element Methods, Rome, 289–300.
Kirchhoff, G. (1869). Zur Theorie freier Flüssigkeitsstrahlen. Z. reine Angew. Math., 70, 289–298.Google Scholar
Kreisel, G. (1946). Cavitation with finite cavitation numbers. Admiralty Res. Lab. Rep. R1/H/36.
Landweber, L. (1951). The axially symmetric potential flow about elongated bodies of revolution. David Taylor Model Basin Report No. 761.
Leehey, P. (1971). Supercavitating hydrofoil of finite span. Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Non-steady Flow of Water at High Speeds, Leningrad, 277–298.
Lemonnier, H. and Rowe, A. (1988). Another approach in modelling cavitating flows. J. Fluid Mech., 195, 557–580.Google Scholar
Levi-Civita, T. (1907). Scie e leggi di resistenzia. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 18, 1–37.Google Scholar
Martin, M. (1962). Unsteady lift and moment on fully cavitating hydrofoils at zero cavitation number. J. Ship Res., 6, No. 1, 15–25.Google Scholar
Mimura, Y. (1958). The flow with wake past an oblique plate. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 13, 1048–1055.Google Scholar
Newman, J.N. (1956). Supercavitating flow past bodies with finite leading edge thickness. David Taylor Model Basin Rep. No. 1081.
Nishiyama, T. (1970). Lifting line theory of supercavitating hydrofoil of finite span. ZAMM, 50, 645–653.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, T. and Ota, T. (1971). Linearized potential flow models for hydrofoils in supercavitating flows. ASME J. Basic Eng., 93, Series D, 550–564.Google Scholar
Numachi, F. (1961). Cavitation tests on hydrofoils designed for accelerating flow cascade: Report 1. ASME J. Basic Eng., 83, Series D, 637–647.Google Scholar
Numachi, F. (1964). Cavitation tests on hydrofoils designed for accelerating flow cascade: Report 3. ASME J. Basic Eng., 86, Series D, 543–555.Google Scholar
Parkin, B.R. (1958). Experiments on circular-arc and flat plate hydrofoils. J. Ship Res., 1, 34–56.Google Scholar
Parkin, B.R. (1959). Linearized theory of cavity flow in two-dimensions. The RAND Corp. (Calif.) Rep. No. P-1745.
Parkin, B.R. (1962). Numerical data on hydrofoil reponse to non-steady motions at zero cavitation number. J. Ship Res., 6, No. 1, 40–42.Google Scholar
Rankine, W.J.M. (1871). On the mathematical theory of stream lines, especially those with four foci and upwards. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 267–306.
Reichardt, H. (1945). The physical laws governing the cavitation bubbles produced behind solids of revolution in a fluid flow. Kaiser Wilhelm Inst. Hyd. Res., Gottingen, TPA3/TIB.
Reichardt, H. and Munzner, H. (1950). Rotationally symmetric source-sink bodies with predominantly constant pressure distributions. Arm. Res. Est. Trans. No. 1/50.
Riabouchinsky, D. (1920). On steady fluid motion with a free surface. Proc. London Math. Soc., 19, 206–215.Google Scholar
Roshko, A. (1954). A new hodograph for free streamline theory. NACA TN 3168.
Rouse, H. and McNown, J.M. (1948). Cavitation and pressure distribution: headforms at zero angles of yaw. Bull. St. Univ. Iowa, Eng., No. 32.
Sedov, L.I. (1966). Plane problems in hydrodynamics and aerodynamics (in Russian). Izdat. “Nauka”, Moscow.
Silberman, E. (1959). Experimental studies of supercavitating flow about simple two-dimensional bodies in a jet. J. Fluid Mech., 5, 337–354.Google Scholar
Sisto, F. (1967). Linearized theory of non-stationary cascades at fully stalled or supercavitating conditions. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 8, 531–542.Google Scholar
Southwell, R.V. and Vaisey, G. (1946). Fluid motions characterized by free streamlines. Phil. Trans., 240, 117–161.Google Scholar
Southwell, R.V. (1948). Relaxation methods in mathematical physics. Oxford Univ. Press.
Stripling, L.B. and Acosta, A.J. (1962). Cavitation in turbopumps—Part 1. ASME J. Basic Eng., Series D, 84, 326–338.Google Scholar
Struck, H.G. (1970). Discontinuous flows and free streamline solutions for axisymmetric bodies at zero and small angles of attack. NASA TN D-5634.
Sutherland, C.D. and Cohen, H. (1958). Finite cavity cascade flow. Proc. 3rd U.S. Nat. Cong. of Appl. Math., 837–845.
Timman, R. (1958) A general linearized theory for cavitating hydrofoils in nonsteady flow. Proc. 2nd ONR Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics, 559–579.
Trefftz, E. (1916). Über die Kontraktion kreisförmiger Flüssigkeits-strahlen. Z. Math. Phys., 64, 34–61.Google Scholar
Tulin, M.P. (1953). Steady two-dimensional cavity flows about slender bodies. David Taylor Model Basin Rep. 834.
Tulin, M.P. (1959). Supercavitating flow past slender delta wings. J. Ship Res., 3, No. 3, 17–22.Google Scholar
Tulin, M.P. (1964). Supercavitating flows—small perturbation theory. J. Ship Res., 7, No. 3, 16–37.Google Scholar
Uhlman, J.S. (1978). A partially cavitated hydrofoil of finite span. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 100, No. 3, 353–354.Google Scholar
Uhlman, J.S. (1987). The surface singularity method applied to partially cavitating hydrofoils. J. Ship Res., 31, No. 2, 107–124.Google Scholar
Uhlman, J.S. (1989). The surface singularity or boundary integral method applied to supercavitating hydrofoils. J. Ship Res., 33, No. 1, 16–20.Google Scholar
Villat, H. (1914). Sur la validité des solutions de certains problèmes d'hydrodynamique. J. Math. Pures Appl.(6), 10, 231–290.Google Scholar
Wade, R.B. (1967). Linearized theory of a partially cavitating cascade of flat plate hydrofoils. Appl. Sci. Res., 17, 169–188.Google Scholar
Wade, R.B. and Acosta, A.J. (1966). Experimental observations on the flow past a planoconvex hydrofoil. ASME J. Basic Eng., 88, 273–283.Google Scholar
Wade, R.B. and Acosta, A.J. (1967). Investigation of cavitating cascades. ASME J. Basic Eng., Series D, 89, 693–706.Google Scholar
Wang, D.P. and Wu, T.Y. (1965). General formulation of a perturbation theory for unsteady cavity flows. ASME J. Basic Eng., 87, 1006–1010.Google Scholar
Widnall, S.E. (1966). Unsteady loads on supercavitating hydrofoils. J. Ship Res., 9, 107–118.Google Scholar
Woods, L.C. (1957). Aerodynamic forces on an oscillating aerofoil fitted with a spoiler. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series A, 239, 328–337.Google Scholar
Woods, L.C. (1951). A new relaxation treatment of flow with axial symmetry. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 4, 358–370.Google Scholar
Woods, L.C. (1961). The theory of subsonic plane flow. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Woods, L.C. and Buxton, G.H.L. (1966). The theory of cascade of cavitating hydrofoils. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 19, 387–402.Google Scholar
Wu, T.Y. (1956). A free streamline theory for two-dimensional fully cavitated hydrofoils. J. Math. Phys., 35, 236–265.Google Scholar
Wu, T.Y. (1957). A linearized theory for nonsteady cavity flows. Calif. Inst. of Tech. Eng. Div. Rep. No. 85–6.
Wu, T.Y. (1962). A wake model for free streamline flow theory, Part 1. Fully and partially developed wake flows and cavity flows past an oblique flat plate. J. Fluid Mech., 13, 161–181.Google Scholar
Wu, T.Y. (1969). Cavity flow analysis; a review of the state of knowledge. In Cavitation State of Knowledge (eds: J.M., Robertson, G.F., Wislicenus), ASME, N.Y.
Wu, T.Y. (1972). Cavity and wake flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 4, 243–284.Google Scholar
Wu, T.Y. and Wang, D.P. (1964a). A wake model for free streamline flow theory, Part 2. Cavity flows past obstacles of arbitrary profile. J. Fluid Mech., 18, 65–93.Google Scholar
Wu, T.Y. and Wang, D.P. (1964b). An approximate numerical scheme for the theory of cavity flows past obstacles of arbitrary profile. ASME J. Basic Eng., 86, 556–560.Google Scholar
Wu, T.Y., Whitney, A.K., and Brennen, C. (1971). Cavity-flow wall effect and correction rules. J. Fluid Mech., 49, 223–256.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×