INTRODUCTION

Each of the foregoing chapters draws conclusions as to the child-specific particularities before the ICC pursuing two research aims:

It has been established, where necessary, whether additional child-specific regulation and awareness is necessary in order to adequately accommodate the particular needs of the child. The research thereby also assessed whether it is possible at all that ICC proceedings are sufficiently child sensitive. If not, it might be necessary to reconsider the possibility that children participate. Summarising the foregoing, the concrete objective this research focused on has been formulated as follows:

When addressing these aims, it has been kept in mind that, even if victims, including children, participate in the proceedings before the Court and claim reparations, I agree with the perspective that the ICC has as its primary objective to ensure a fair trial for alleged perpetrators. Accordingly, throughout the entire research, the punitive nature has been of foremost importance when balancing the best interests of the child against the core objective of international criminal justice. Bearing in mind the objective of the ICC, the fight against impunity, an individual examination of a child (and in particular the individual child's best interests) could be considered to be beyond the capacities of a criminal court whose core task is to safeguard that alleged perpetrators receive a fair trial. One may therefore as such still question the principal relevance of child participation in ICC proceedings.