Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:24:33.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Scale in children's experience with the environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

Christopher Spencer
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Mark Blades
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

Children's daily lives are complex, unique, and inherently spatial (Hart, 1979). Children explore the space around them even before they are mobile. Before they can locomote, or move from place to place (crawl, walk, run, etc.) independently, infants are interested in many of the things that fall within their reach. As will be discussed later, and as Piaget and others have suggested, these early explorations play an important role in how children come to know the world around them. One way we can understand the role that space plays in the lives of children is through scale. Scale provides a context within which spaces, places, and environments of different types can be integrated and better understood.

Definitions of scale and space

As valuable as scale is for understanding the relationships among different environments it is also a complex construct that has been extended to disparate classes of spaces, places, and geographies. For example, geographers study phenomena at various scales and often use the term scale to help define their research interests. Scale is also employed in many other disciplines to help define phenomena, concepts, interactions, and relationships. Lay definitions of scale, both related and unrelated to the stricter definitions employed in academic endeavours, also exist. For these reasons the use of the term scale varies in different contexts and can lead to confusion.

There have been a few attempts to categorize the nature of these different classes of definitions and provide a systematic understanding of scale across disciplines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Children and their Environments
Learning, Using and Designing Spaces
, pp. 13 - 25
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, S. (2002). Spatial cognition and scale: A child's perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLoache, J. S. (1989). Young children's understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space. Cognitive Development, 4(2), 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLoache, J. S. (1990). Young children's understanding of models. In Fivush, R. and Hudson, J. A. (eds.), Knowing and Remembering in Young Children. Emory Symposia in Cognition, vol.III (pp. 94–126). New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeLoache, J. S., Miller, K. F. and Rosengren, K. S. (1997). The credible shrinking room: Very young children's performance with symbolic and nonsymbolic relations. Psychological Science, 8(4), 308–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egenhofer, M. J. and Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freundschuh, S. and Egenhofer, M. (1997). Human conceptions of spaces: Implications for Geographic Information Systems. Transactions in GIS, 2(4), 361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freundschuh, S. M. (1997). Research in geography, space, and development: How can it inform geographic education? In Boehm, R. G. and Petersen, J. F. (eds.), The First Assessment: Research in Geographic Education (pp. 68–81). San Marcos: The Gilbert M. Grosvenor Center for Geographic Education.Google Scholar
Gärling, T. and Golledge, R. G. (1987). Environmental perception and cognition. In Zube, E. H. and Moore, G. T. (eds.), Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design (vol. II, pp. 203–36). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, R. (1979). Children's Experience of Place. New York: Irvington Publishers, distributed by Halsted Press.Google Scholar
Herman, J. F., Kolker, R. G. and Shaw, M. L. (1982). Effects of motor activity on children's intentional and incidental memory for spatial locations. Child Development, 53(1), 239–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herman, J. F., Roth, S. F., Miranda, C. and Getz, M. (1982). Children's memory for spatial locations: The influence of recall perspective and type of environment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34(2), 257–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hund, A. M. and Plumert, J. M. (2003). Does information about what things are influence children's memory for where things are?Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 939–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. and Presson, C. C. (1979). The coding and transformation of spatial information. Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 375–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ittelson, W. H. (1973). Environmental perception and contemporary perceptual theory. In Ittelson, W. H. (ed.), Environmental and Cognition (pp. 1–19). New York: Seminar.Google Scholar
Larsen, G. Y. and Abravanel, E. (1972). An examination of the developmental relations between certain spatial tasks. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
Lockman, J. J. and Pick, H. L. (1984). Problems of scale in spatial development. In Sophian, C. (ed.), Origins of Cognitive Skills. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (1983). Representation. In Messen, P. (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (4th edn, vol. III, pp. 420–94). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mark, D. M. (1993). Toward a theoretical framework for geographical entity types. In Frank, A. U. and Campari, I. (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS (pp. 270–83). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In Frank, A. U. and Campari, I. (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS (pp. 312–21). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, C., Atkinson, J. and Braddick, O. (2001). The development of reaching and looking preferences in infants to objects of different sizes. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 561–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1956). The Child's Conception of Space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Plumert, J. M. and Hund, A. M. (2001). The development of memory for location: What role do spatial-prototypes play?Child Development, 72(2), 370–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purcell, M. (2003). Islands of practice and the Marston/Brenner debate: toward a more synthetic critical human geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 27(3), 317–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P. C., Adams, A., Kennedy, E., Shettler, L. and Wasnik, A. (2003). Development of an abstract category representation for the spatial relation between in 6- to 10-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 151–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamara, T. P., Shelton, A. L. and Carr, W. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 215–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., Franklin, N. and Bryant, D. J. (1999). Three spaces of spatial cognition. Professional Geographer, 51(4), 516–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uttal, D., Schreiber, J. C. and DeLoache, J. S. (1995). Waiting to use a symbol: The effects of delay on children's use of models. Child Development, 66(6), 1875–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uttal, D. H. (1990). Young Children's Mental Representation of Spatial Information Acquired From Maps. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Weatherford, D. L. (1982). Spatial cognition as a function of size and scale of the environment. New Directions for Child Development(15), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×