Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:43:34.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Changing Family Forms: The Implications for Children’s Development

from Part III - Social, Legal, and Technological Change: Impact on Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

Ross D. Parke
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Glen H. Elder, Jr.
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

The proliferation of a wide variety of family forms has challenged the centrality and necessity of the traditional nuclear family as a context for successful socialization. Views of the importance of the gender of parents, sexual orientation of parents, biological relatedness of family members, and new routes to parenthood are challenged. Increases in divorce, the rise in the number of stepfamilies, cohabitating couples, single parents, and adoption raise further questions about the links between both the number of parents and the biological ties among family members. The gender, sexual orientation, or biological relatedness of the agent of delivery of the critical ingredients for socialization (i.e., stimulation, nurturance ,guidance, limit setting) or the family form in which these processes are enacted are less important than the processes themselves. Second, an interdependent model of family functioning is proposed, which reflects the increasing degree of outsourcing of tasks and responsibilities. To maximize assistance available to a full range of family forms, it is critical that policy makers recognize the diversity of family forms and develop suitable policies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Children in Changing Worlds
Sociocultural and Temporal Perspectives
, pp. 192 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, P. R. (2001). Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 355370.Google Scholar
Amato, P. R. (2014). The consequences of divorce for adults and children: An update. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 23, 524.Google Scholar
Amato, P. R. & Boyd, L. M. (2014). Children and divorce in world perspective. Contemporary Issues in Family Studies: Global perspectives on partnerships, parenting and support in a changing world (pp. 227243). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1993). The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, D. & Marsiglio, W. (2007). Gay men negotiating procreative, father, and family identities. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 69, 366381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. (2006). Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Biblarz, T. J. & Stacey, J. (2010). How does the gender of parents matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchfield, B. V. & Patterson, C. J. (2015). Racial and sexual minority women’s receipt of medical assistance to become pregnant. Health Psychology, 34, 571579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, P. & Schwartz, P. (1983). American Couples: Money, work, sex. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Bos, H. M. W., Kuyper, L., & Gartrell, N. K. (2018). A population-based comparison of female and male same-sex parent and different-sex parent households. Family Process, 57, 148164.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bramlett, M. D. & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. Vital Health Statistics, 23, 193.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L. (2017). Families in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L. & Lin, I-F. (2012). The gray divorce revolution: Rising divorce among middle-aged and older adults, 1990–2010. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67, 731741.Google Scholar
Cahn, N. (2013). The New Kinship: Constructing donor-conceived families. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, M. & McLanahan, S. (2010). Fathers in fragile families. In Lamb, M. E. (Ed.), The Role of the Father in Child Development (5th ed., pp. 241269). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, S. E. & Huston, A. C. (2008). The timing of family instability and children’s social development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 12581270.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). Multiple Births. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016). Teen Pregnancy in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
Chambers, G. M., Sullivan, E. A., Ishihara, O. et al. (2009). The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 22812294.Google Scholar
Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The Marriage-Go-Round: The state of marriage and the family today. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Clarke-Stewart, A. & Brentano, C. (2006). Divorce: Causes and consequences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke-Stewart, K. A. & Hayward, C. (1996). Advantages of father custody and contact for the psychological well-being of school-age children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17, 239270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, M., Hoorens, S., & Chambers, G. M. (2010). The costs and consequences of ART: An economic perspective. Human Reproduction, 16, 603613.Google Scholar
Copen, C. E., Daniels, K., & Mosher, W. D. (2013). First Premarital Cohabitation in the United States: 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, 64, 115.Google Scholar
Child Trends Databank. (2015). Births to Unmarried Women. Bethesda, MD: Child Trends.Google Scholar
Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a History: From obedience to intimacy or how love conquered marriage. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Cox, M. J. & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dallaire, D. (2019). Incarcerated parents. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.) Handbook of Parenting (3rd ed., Vol. 4). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deutsch, F. (1999). Halving It All: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Doucet, A. (2013). Gender roles and fathering. In Tamis-LeMonda, C. & Cabrera, N. (Eds.) 2nd ed,. Handbook of Father Involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 297319). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dreby, J. (2010). Divided by Borders: Mexican migrants and children. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dunifon, R. E. & Kowaleski-Jones, L. (2002). Who’s in the house? Race differences in cohabitation, single-parenthood and child development. Child Development, 73, 12491264.Google Scholar
Easterbrooks, M. A., Katz, R. C., & Menon, M. (2019). Adolescent parenting. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.) Handbook of Parenting (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edin, K. & Kefalas, M. J. (2005). Promises I Can Keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Edin, K. & Nelson, T. (2013). Doing the Best I Can: Fathering in the inner city. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 112.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H., Jr, Shanahan, M. J., & Jennings, J. A. (2015). Human development in time and place. In Lerner, R. M. (Ed. in chief), Leventhal, T., & Bornstein, M. (Eds.). Handbook of Child Psychology Developmental Science: Ecological settings developmental processes in systems. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2019). The social neuroendocrinology of human parenting. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.) Handbook of Parenting (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feldman, R., Gordon, I., Schneiderman, I., Weisman, O., & Zagoory-Sharon, O. (2010). Natural variations in maternal and paternal care are associated with systematic changes in oxytocin following parent-infant contact. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 11331141.Google Scholar
Fry, R. & Cohn, D. (2011, June). Living Together: The economics of cohabitation. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F. (2014). Fifty years of family change: From consensus to complexity. In Carlson, M & Meyer, D. R. (Eds.), Family Complexity, Poverty, and Public Policy, Annals, 654, 1230.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F, Brooks-Gunn, J., & Morgan, S. P. (1987). Adolescent Mothers in Later Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F., Cook, T. D., Eccles, J., Elder, Jr., G. H., & Sameroff, A. (1999). Managing to Make It: Urban families and adolescent success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gates, G. J. (2012, April). Same-Sex Couples in Census 2010: Race and ethnicity. Los Angeles, CA: Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law.Google Scholar
Gates, G. J. (2015). Demographics of Married and Unmarried Same Sex Couples: Analyses of the 2013 American community survey. Los Angeles, CA: Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law.Google Scholar
Gates, G. J. (2015). Marriage and family: LGBT individuals and same sex couples. Future of Children, 25(2), 6787.Google Scholar
Gates, G. J., Badgett, M. L., Macomber, J. E., & Chambers, K. (2007). Adoption and Foster Care by Gay and Lesbian Parents in the United States. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Gato, J., Santos, S., & Fontaine, A. M. (2017). To have or not to have children? That is the question: Factors influencing parental decisions among lesbians and gay men. Sex Research and Social Policy, 14 , 310323.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Lesbian and Gay Parents and Their Children: Research on the family life cycle. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2012). Gay Dads: Transitions to adoptive fatherhood. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Downing, J. B., & Moyer, A. M. (2012). Why parenthood, and why now? Gay men’s motivations for pursuing parenthood. Family Relations, 61, 157174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin, C. & Katz, L. F. (2002). The power of the pill: Oral contraceptives and women’s career and marriage decisions. Journal of Political Economy 110, 730770.Google Scholar
Golombok, S. (2000). Parenting: What really counts? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Golombok, S. (2015). Modern Families: Parents and children in new family forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Golombok, S., Mellish, L., Jennings, S., Casey, P., Tasker, F. et al. (2014). Adoptive gay father families: Parent-child relationships and children’s psychological adjustment. Child Development, 85, 456468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S., Owen, L., Blake, L. et al. (2009). Parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of 18-year-old adolescents conceived by in vitro fertilisation. Human Fertility, 12, 6372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S., Zadeh, S., Imrie, S., Smith, V., & Freeman, T. (2016). Single mothers by choice: Mother–child relationships and children’s psychological adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 409418.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 673676.Google Scholar
Hertz, R. (2006). Single by Chance, Mothers by Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, E. M. & Kelly, J. (2002). For Better or Worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J. M., & Furstenberg, Jr., F. F. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: Results from 17 western countries. Population and Development Review, 29, 4771.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The Outsourced Self: Intimate life in market times. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Howes, C. & Spieker, S. (2016). Attachment relationships in the context of multiple caregivers. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and Others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (July 2012). The world’s number of IVF and ICSI babies has now reached a calculated total of 5 million. Paper presented at 28th annual meeting of ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology), Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Jain, T. & Hornstein, M. D. (2005). Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage Fertility and Sterility, 84, 221223.Google Scholar
Jadva, V., Badger, S., Morrissette, M., & Golombok, S. (2009). “Mom by choice, single by life’s circumstance”: Findings from a large scale survey of the experiences of single mothers by choice. Human Fertility, 12, 175184.Google Scholar
Joyner, K. A., Manning, W. D., & Bogle, R. H. (2017). Gender and the stability of same-sex and different-sex relationships among young adults. Demography, 54, 23512374.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. F., Redenbach, L., & Rinaman, W. (2005). Determinants of sole and joint physical custody arrangements in a national sample of divorces. American Journal of Family Law, 19(1), 2543.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. & Bumpass, L. (2011). Cohabitation and Trends in the Structure and Stability of Children’s Family Lives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. & Ruggles, S. (2014). Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography, 51(2), 587598.Google Scholar
Kimberly, C. & Moore, A. (2015). Attitudes to practice: National survey of adoption obstacles faced by gay and lesbian prospective parents. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 27, 436456.Google Scholar
Konigsberg, R. D. (2011, August 8). Chore wars. Time, 4548.Google Scholar
Kreider, R. M. (2008). Improvements to demographic household data in the Current Population Survey: 2007. Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division Working Paper; Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kreider, R. M. & Ellis, R. (2011). Number, Timing, and Duration of Marriages and Divorces: 2009. Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, pp. 70125.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B. (2014). Growing Up Fast: Re-visioning adolescent mothers transitions to early adulthood. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 18112–18115.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. & van de Kaa, D. (1986). Twee demografische transities? (Two demographic transitions?). In R. Lesthaeghe & D. van de Kaa (Eds.), Bevolking–Groei en Krimp, Mens en Maatschappij. The Netherlands: Van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer, Dutch, pp. 924.Google Scholar
Lipman, E. L., Boyle, M. H., Dooley, M. D. & Offord, D. R. (2002). Child well-being in single-mother families. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 7582.Google Scholar
Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. A., & Stearns, J. (2016). Family inequality: diverging patterns in marriage, cohabitation, and childbearing. Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic Association, 30(2), 79102.Google Scholar
MacDermid Wadsworth, S. (2013). Understanding and supporting the resilience of a new generation of combat-exposed military families and their children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 16, 415420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, M. & Weston, D. (1981). The quality of the toddler’s relationship to mother and father: Related to conflict behavior and readiness to establish new relationships. Child Development, 52, 932940.Google Scholar
Manning, W. D. & Brown, S. L. (2012). Cohabitation and parenting. In Cabrera, N. J. and LeMonda, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Father Involvement: multidisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 281–296). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Martin, S. P. (2006). Trends in marital dissolution by women’s education in the United States. Demographic Research, 15: 537560.Google Scholar
Mather, M. (2010). US Children in Single-Mother Families. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
McCartney, K. (2015–16). Working moms deserve better. Smith Alumnae Quarterly, Winter, p. 37.Google Scholar
McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: how children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41(4), 607627.Google Scholar
McLanahan, S. & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing Up with a Single Parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Milardo, R. (2010). The Forgotten Kin: Aunts and uncles. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. J. (2014, June). Canadian Families in the Global Context: The world family map. Ottawa: Institute of Marriage and Family.Google Scholar
Osberg, L. (2015). Economic Inequality in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parke, R. D. (2013). Future Families: Diverse forms, rich possibilities. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parke, R. D. & Brott, A. (1999). Throwaway Dads. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Parke, R. D. & Cookston, J. T. (2019). Fathers and families. In Bornstein, M (Ed.) Handbook of Parenting (3rd ed., Vol. 3). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parke, R. D., Gailey, C., Coltrane, S., & DiMatteo, R. (2012). The pursuit of perfection: Transforming our construction of parenthood and family in the age of new reproductive technologies. In Essed, P. & Goldberg, D. T. (Eds.), Clones, Fakes and Posthumans: Cultures of replication. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. J. (2013). Children of lesbian and gay parents: Psychology, law, and policy. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1 (S), 2734.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. J. & Riskind, R. G. (2010). To be a parent: Issues in family formation among gay and lesbian adults. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 6, 326340.Google Scholar
Payne, K. K. & Manning, W. D. (2015). Number of children living in same-sex couple households, 2013 NCFMR Family Profile FP-15-04. National Center for Family & Marriage Research, Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center Publications (2010). Since the Start of the Great Recession, More Children Raised by Grandparents. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center Publications (2010). The Return of the Multi-Generational Family Household. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center Publications (2015). Parenting in America: The American family today. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, December 17.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pleck, J. H. (2010). A revised conceptualization of paternal involvement. In Lamb, M. E. (ed.) The Role of the Father in Child Development (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Raley, R. K., Sweeney, M. M., & Wondra, D. (2015). The growing racial and ethnic divide in US marriage patterns. The Future of Children, 25, 89109.Google Scholar
Riskind, R. G. & Patterson, C. J. (2010). Parenting intentions and desires among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 7881.Google Scholar
Riskind, R. G., Patterson, C. J., & Nosek, B. A. (2013). Childless lesbian and gay adults self-efficacy about achieving parenthood. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and practice, 2(3), 222235.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. J. (2010). Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school. Demography, 47, 755775.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. J. (2014). Couple longevity in the era of same-sex marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 905918.Google Scholar
Ross, H., Gask, K. & Berrington, A. (2011). Civil partnerships five years on: 145 population trends. Office for National Statistics, Autumn.Google Scholar
Ross, H. & Taylor, H. (1989). Do boys prefer daddy or his physical style of play? Sex Roles, 20, 2333.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Martin, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2006). Is one parent good enough? Patterns of mother and father parenting and child cognitive outcomes at 24 and 36 months. Parenting: Science and Practice, 6, 211228.Google Scholar
Schacher, J. S., Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2005). Gay fathers expanding the possibilities for us all. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 1, 3152.Google Scholar
Schaffer, H. R. & Emerson, P. E. (1964). The development of social attachments in infancy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29(3, Serial No. 94).Google Scholar
Silverstein, L. B. & Auerbach, C. F. (1999). Deconstructing the essential father. American Psychologist, 54, 397407.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K. & Wild, L. G. (2019). Grandparenting. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting (2nd ed., Vol. 3). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 120.Google Scholar
Spar, D. L. (2006). The Baby Business: how money, science, and politics drive the commerce of conception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stack, C. (1974). All Our Kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Storey, A. E., Walsh, C. J., Quinton, R. L., & Wynne-Edwards, D. E. (2000). Hormonal correlates of paternal responsiveness in new and expectant fathers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 7995.Google Scholar
Sugarman, S. D. (2008). What is a “Family”? Conflicting messages from our public programs. Family Law Quarterly, 42, 231261.Google Scholar
Tronick, E. Z., Morelli, G. A., & Ivey, P. K. (1992). The Efe forager infant and toddler’s pattern of social relationships: Multiple and simultaneous. Developmental Psychology, 28, 568577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twine, F. W. (2011). Outsourcing the Womb: Race, class and gestational surrogacy in a global market. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau (2010). Current Population Survey (CPS). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau (2011). Annual Social and Economic Supplement (Table PoV03). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau (2012). Households and Families: 2010. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau (2016). The Majority of Children Live With Two Parents, Census Bureau Reports. Washington, DC, November 17.Google Scholar
US Department of Labor (2013). Working Mothers. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Van Hook, J. & Glick, J. E. (2007). Immigration and living arrangements: Moving beyond economic need versus acculturation. Demography, 44, 225249.Google Scholar
Warshak, R. & Santrock, J. W. (1983). The impact of divorce in father-custody and mother-custody: The child’s perspective. In Kurdek, L. A (Ed.) Children and Divorce (pp. 29–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Weissenberg, R., Landau, R., & Madgar, I. (2007). Older single mothers assisted by sperm donation and their children. Human Reproduction, 22, 27842791.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. D. M. & Harper, G. (2013). Race and ethnicity in lesbian, gay and bisexual communities. In Patterson, C. J. & D’Augelli, A. R. (Eds.). Handbook of Psychology and Sexual Orientation (pp. 281296). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeung, W. J., Sandberg, J. F., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Hofferth, S. L. (2001). Children’s time with fathers in infant families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 136154.Google Scholar
Zaidi, B. & Morgan, S. P. (2017). The second demographic transition theory: A review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 473492.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×