It is only in a general sense that the Christian writers of Antioch can be called Aristotelian. The sense in which the term is admissible is that which credits them with an Aristotelian frame of mind or outlook, and this is probably true of many of them even when they had little knowledge of Aristotle's work and joined the chorus of patristic condemnation of many of his philosophical tenets. Aristotle's concentration of mind upon observable facts finds some analogy in the Antiochene emphasis upon historical events and upon the humanity of Christ, but this much hardly allows us to see Aristotle as a direct influence upon their thinking. In so far as they refer to him, it is usually to demonstrate his errors, and like all Christians of a philosophical turn of mind during the first four centuries after Christ, they find Plato more congenial. It was the Syriac-speaking Church to the east of Antioch which, in the centuries after Antioch itself had ceased to be important as an intellectual centre, adopted Aristotelian logical method wholeheartedly for reasons which are not in all respects clear and which are certainly complex, and then elevated a serviceable logical tool into a closed system such as Aristotle himself might well have repudiated. It was the Syrian Church that transmitted the entire Aristotelian corpus to the Arab world, and so played an important rôle in saving Aristotle for the west. But in this Antioch itself played no part. Indeed it can be said that Alexandria, that nursery of Platonists, contributed demonstrably more to the study of Aristotle than was ever true of Antioch.