Bibliography

Suzanne Watts Henderson

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511487989.010

Aalders, Gerhard Charles. “Fishers and the Hunters.” Evangelical Quarterly 30 (1958): 133–9Google Scholar

Achtemeier, Paul J. “Person and Deed. Jesus and the Storm-Tossed Sea.” Interpretation 16 (1962): 169–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Achtemeier, Paul “Toward the Isolation of Pre-Markan Miracle Catenae.” Journal of Biblical Literature 89 (1970): 265–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Achtemeier, Paul “The Origin and Function of the Pre-Markan Miracle Catenae.” Journal of Biblical Literature91 (1972): 198–221Google Scholar

Achtemeier, Paul “‘He Taught Them Many Things’: Reflections on Marcan Christology.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 42 (1980): 465–81Google Scholar

Achtemeier, PaulMark. 2nd edn. Proclamation Commentaries. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C.The New Moses: A Matthean Typology. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1993Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C.Jesus of Nazareth: Millenarian Prophet. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998Google Scholar

Ambrozic, Aloysius M.The Hidden Kingdom: A Redaction-Critical Study of the References to the Kingdom of God in Mark's Gospel. Washington: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1972Google Scholar

Ambrozic, Aloysius M. The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers down to AD 325. 5th edn. Ed. Menzies, A.. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1978Google Scholar

Aune, David E. “A Note on Jesus' Messianic Self-Consciousness and 11QMelchizedek.” Evangelical Quarterly 45 (1973): 161–5Google Scholar

Aune, David E.The New Testament in Its Literary Environment. Library of Early Christianity 8. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1989Google Scholar

Baird, J. Arthur. “A Pragmatic Approach to Parable Exegesis: Some New Evidence on Mark 4:11, 33–34.” Journal of Biblical Literature 76 (1957): 201–7CrossRef Google Scholar

Bassler, Jouette M. “The Parable of the Loaves.” Journal of Religion 66 (1986): 157–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Bauer, W., , W. F. Arndt,, F. W. Gingrich, and , F. W. Danker,A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979Google Scholar

Beavis, Mary Ann. Mark's Audience: The Literary and Social Setting of Mark 4.11–12. JSNTSup 33. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1989Google Scholar

Beker, J. Christiaan. Paul the Apostle: Triumph of God in Life and Thought. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984; orig. 1980Google Scholar

Best, Ernest. “Mark ⅲ. 20, 21, 31–35.” New Testament Studies 22 (1975–6): 309–19CrossRef Google Scholar

Best, Ernest “Mark's Use of the Twelve.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1978): 11–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Best, ErnestFollowing Jesus: Discipleship in the Gospel of Mark. JSNTSup 4. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1981Google Scholar

Best, ErnestMark: The Gospel as Story. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1983Google Scholar

Best, ErnestDisciples and Discipleship: Studies in the Gospel According to Mark. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1986Google Scholar

Best, Ernest “Mark's Preservation of Tradition.” In The Interpretation of Mark. Ed. Telford, W.. 2nd edn. Issues in Religion and Theology 7. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1999; orig. 1977. 119–33Google Scholar

Betz, Hans Dieter. Nachfolge und Nachahmung Jesu Christi im Neuen Testament. Beiträge zur historischen Theologie 37. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck), 1967Google Scholar

Black, C. Clifton. The Disciples According to Mark: Markan Redaction in Current Debate. JSNTSup 27. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1989Google Scholar

Blackburn, Barry. Theios Aner and the Markan Miracle Traditions: A Critique of the Theios Aner Concept as an Interpretative Background of the Miracle Traditions Used by Mark. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.40. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991Google Scholar

Blevins, James L.The Messianic Secret in Markan Research, 1901–1976. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1981Google Scholar

Bolyki, J. “Menge–Tischgemeinschaft–Gruppe.” Communio Viatorum 24 (1992): 20–6Google Scholar

Boobyer, George H. “The Eucharistic Interpretation of the Miracles of the Loaves in St. Mark's Gospel.” Journal of Theological Studies 3 (1952): 161–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Boring, M. Eugene. “The Christology of Mark: Hermeneutical Issues for Systematic Theology.” Semeia 30 (1984): 125–51Google Scholar

Boring, M. Eugene “Mark 1:1–15 and the Beginning of the Gospel.” Semeia 52 (1990): 43–81Google Scholar

Gunther, Bornkamm. “μυστήριον.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament 4 (1967): 814–17Google Scholar

Bostock, D. Gerald. “Jesus as the New Elisha.” Expository Times 92 (1980): 39–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Boucher, Madeleine. The Mysterious Parable: A Literary Study. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 6. Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association, 1977Google Scholar

Breytenbach, Cilliers. Nachfolge und Zukunftserwartung nach Markus: Eine methodenkritische Studie. Abhandlungen zur Theologie des Alten und Neuen Testaments 71. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1984Google Scholar

Bright, John. Jeremiah. Anchor Bible 21. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1965Google Scholar

Broadhead, Edwin K.Teaching with Authority: Miracles and Christology in the Gospel of Mark. JSNTSup 74. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992Google Scholar

Brodie, Thomas L. “Jesus as the New Elisha: Cracking the Code.” Expository Times 93 (1981): 39–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.The Gospel According to John. Anchor Bible 29 and 29A. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966–70Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “Parable and Allegory Reconsidered.” In New Testament Essays. Garden City, NY: Image/Doubleday, 1968. 321–33Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.Semitic Background of the Term “Mystery” in the New Testament. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1968Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “Jesus and Elisha.” Perspective 12 (1971): 85–104Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1951–5Google Scholar

Bultmann, RudolfThe History of the Synoptic Tradition. Trans. John Marsh. Rev. edn. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1994; orig. 1921Google Scholar

Burkill, T. Alec. Mysterious Revelation: An Examination of the Philosophy of St. Mark's Gospel. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1963Google Scholar

Charlesworth, James H., ed. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1983, 1985Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. The Beginning of the Gospel: Probings of Mark in Context. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992Google Scholar

Collins, John J.The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to the Jewish Matrix of Christianity. 2dn. edn. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998; orig. 1984Google Scholar

Cranfield, C. E. B.The Gospel According to Saint Mark: An Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge Greek Testament Commentaries. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977Google Scholar

Craigie, Peter C., Page, H. Kelley, and Joel, F. Drinkard Jr.Jeremiah 1–25. Word Biblical Commentary 26. Dallas: Word Books, 1991Google Scholar

Cross, Frank Moore. Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973Google Scholar

Crossan, John Dominic. In Parables: The Challenge of the Historical Jesus. New York: Harper & Row, 1973Google Scholar

Crossan, John DominicThe Historical Jesus. San Francisco: Harper, 1991Google Scholar

Daube, David C. “ἐχουσία in Mk. ⅰ. 22 and 27.” Journal of Theological Studies 39 (1938): 45–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Daube, David C. “Responsibilities of Master and Disciples in the Gospel.” New Testament Studies 19 (1972–3): 1–15CrossRef Google Scholar

Davies, Margaret. Rhetoric and Reference in the Fourth Gospel. JSNTSup 69. Sheffield, England: JSOT Press, 1992Google Scholar

Davies, W. D. and Dale, C. Allison. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. 3 vols. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1988–97Google Scholar

Delling, G. “πλήρης.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament 6 (1968; orig. 1959): 459–62Google Scholar

Denis, Albert-Marie. “La Marche de Jésus sur les eaux: contribution à l'histoire de la péricope dans la tradition évangélique.” In De Jésus aux évangiles. Ed. Potterie, I.. Gembloux: Duculot, 1967. 233–47Google Scholar

Dewey, Joanna. Markan Public Debate: Literary Technique, Concentric Structure, and Theology in Mark 2:1–3:6. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 48. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1980Google Scholar

Dibelius, Martin. Die urchristliche Überlieferung von Johannes dem Täufer. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1911Google Scholar

Dibelius, MartinFrom Tradition to Gospel. Rev. 2nd edn. Trans. B. Lee Woolf. London: James Clarke, 1971; orig. 1933Google Scholar

Dodd, C. H.The Parables of the Kingdom. New York: Scribner's, 1961Google Scholar

Dodd, C. H.According to the Scriptures. London: Fontana, 1965; orig. 1957Google Scholar

Donahue, John R.The Theology and Setting of Discipleship in the Gospel of Mark. The 1983 Père Marquette Theology Lecture. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1983Google Scholar

Dormeyer, Detlev. Die Passion Jesu als Verhaltensmodell: literarische und theologische Analyse der Traditions- und Redaktionsgeschichte der Markuspassion. Münster: Verlag Aschendorff, 1974Google Scholar

Dowd, Sharyn. Reading Mark: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Second Gospel. Reading the New Testament Series. Macon, GA: Smith & Helwys, 2000Google Scholar

Drury, John. The Parables in the Gospels: History and Allegory. London: SPCK, 1985Google Scholar

Dupont, Jacques. “La Parabole du semeur.” Foi et Vie 66 (1967): 3–25

Egger, Wilhelm. Frohbotschaft und Lehre: Die Sammelberichte das Wirkens Jesu im Markusevangelium. Frankfurt am Main: Knecht, 1976Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D. “The Text of Mark in the Hands of the Orthodox.” Lutheran Quarterly 5 (1991): 143–56Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D.Saint Ephrem's Commentary on Tatian's Diatessaron: An English Translation of Chester Beatty Syriac MS 709. With introduction and notes by Carmel McCarthy. JSSSup 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the University of Manchester, 1993Google Scholar

Erlangen, Gerhard Friedrich. “Die beiden Erzählungen von der Speisung in Markus 6,31–44, 8,1–9.” Theologische Zeitschrift 20 (1964): 10–22Google Scholar

Evans, Craig A.To See and Not Perceive: Isaiah 6.9–10 in Early Jewish and Christian Interpretation. JSOTSup 64. Sheffield, England: JSOT Press, 1989Google Scholar PubMed

Fanning, Buist M.Verbal Aspect in New Testament Greek. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990Google Scholar

Farmer, William R.The Synoptic Problem: A Critical Analysis. Mercer, GA: Mercer University Press, 1981; orig. 1964Google Scholar

Fay, Greg. “Introduction to Incomprehension: The Literary Structure of Mark 4:1–34.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 51 (1989): 65–81Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1987Google Scholar

Fishbane, Michael. The Garments of Torah: Essays in Biblical Hermeneutics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Fleddermann, Harry. “‘And He Wanted to Pass by Them’ (Mark 6:48c).” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 45 (1983): 389–95Google Scholar

Focant, Camille. “L'Incompréhension des disciples dans le deuxième évangile.” Revue biblique 82 (1975): 161–85Google Scholar

Focant, Camille “La Tête du prophète sur un plat, ou, L'Anti-repas d'alliance (Mc 6.14–29).” New Testament Studies 46 (2001): 334–53Google Scholar

Fowler, Robert M.Loaves and Fishes: The Function of the Feeding Stories in the Gospel of Mark. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 54. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1981Google Scholar

Frei, Hans W.The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993; orig. 1974Google Scholar

Freyne, Seán. “The Disciples in Mark and the MASKILIM in Daniel. A Comparison.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 16 (1982): 7–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Freyne, Seán “Galilee, Sea of.” In The Anchor Bible Dictionary, II. Ed. Freedman, David Noel. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1992. 900Google Scholar

Freyne, SeánThe Twelve: Disciples and Apostles: A Study in the Theology of the First Three Gospels. London: Sydney, Sheed & Ward, 1968Google Scholar

Friedrich, G. “εὐαγγελίζομαι.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament 2 (1964): 707–37Google Scholar

Gamble, Harry Y.Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995Google Scholar

García Martínez, Florentino and Eibert, J. C. Tigchelaar, eds. The Dead Sea Scrolls: Study Edition. 2 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997–8Google Scholar

Gerhardsson, Birger. “The Parable of the Sower and Its Interpretation.” New Testament Studies 14 (1967–8): 165–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibson, Jeffrey B. “Jesus' Wilderness Temptation According to Mark.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 53 (1994): 13–34Google Scholar

Gnilka, Joachim. Die Verstockung Israels. Isaias 6:9–10 in der Theologie der Synoptiker. Munich: Kösel, 1961Google Scholar

Gnilka, JoachimDas Evangelium nach Markus. 2 vols. Evangelisch-katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 2. Zurich: Benziger; Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1978–9Google Scholar

Goldingay, John. “‘Holy Ones on High’ in Daniel 7:18.” Journal of Biblical Literature 107 (1988): 495–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Grundmann, Walter. Das Evangelium nach Markus. Theologischer Handkommentar zum Neuen Testament 2. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1977Google Scholar

Guelich, Robert A.Mark 1–8:26. Word Biblical Commentary 34A. Dallas: Word, 1989Google Scholar

Gundry, Robert H.Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993Google Scholar

Haenchen, E.Der Weg Jesu: Eine Erklärung des Markus-Evangeliums und der kanonischen Parallelen. Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1966Google Scholar

Hahn, Friedrich. Mission in the New Testament. Studies in Biblical Theology 47. London: SCM Press, 1965Google Scholar

Hahn, Friedrich “Das Gleichnis von der ausgestreuten Saat und seine Deutung (Mk. ⅳ. 3–8, 14–20).” In Text and Interpretation. Ed. , E. Best and , R. McL. Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. 133–42Google Scholar

Hartman, Louis Francis and Alexander, A. Di Lella. The Book of Daniel. Anchor Bible 23. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1978Google Scholar

Hawkin, David J. “The Incomprehension of the Disciples in Marcan Redaction.” Journal of Biblical Literature 91 (1972): 491–500CrossRef Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B.Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B.First Corinthians. Interpretation. Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 1997Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. “Can the Gospels Teach Us How to Read the Old Testament?” Pro Ecclesia 11 (2002): 402–17Google Scholar

Heil, John P.Jesus Walking on the Sea: Meaning and Gospel Functions of Matt. 14:22–33, Mark 6:45–52 and John 6:15b–21. AnBib 87. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1981Google Scholar

Heising, Alkuin. Die Botschaft der Brotvermehrung: zur Geschichte und Bedeutung eines Christusbekenntnisses im Neuen Testament. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1966Google Scholar

Henderson, Suzanne Watts. “‘Concerning the Loaves’: Comprehending Incomprehension in Mark 6.45–52.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 83 (2001): 3–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. The Charismatic Leader and His Followers. Trans. J. Grieg. Studies in the New Testament and Its World. New York: Crossroad, 1981Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Paul. Studien zur Theologie der Logienquelle. Münster: Verlag Aschendorff, 1972Google Scholar

Hooker, Morna D.A Commentary on the Gospel according to St. Mark. Black's New Testament Commentaries 2. London: A. & C. Black, 1991Google Scholar

Hooker, Morna D. “Mark's Parables of the Kingdom (Mark 4:1–34).” In The Challenge of Jesus' Parables. Ed. Richard, N. Longenecker. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000. 79–101Google Scholar

Horbury, William. “The Twelve and the Phylarchs.” New Testament Studies 32 (1986): 503–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Iersel, Bastiaan Martinus Franciscus. “Die wunderbare Speisung und das Abendmahl in der synoptischen Tradition (Mk. VI.35–44 par VIII.1–20 par).” Novum Testamentum 7 (1964): 167–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Jeremias, Joachim. Eucharistic Words of Jesus. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1966Google Scholar

Jeremias, Joachim “Paarweise Sendung im Neuen Testament.” In Abba: Studien zur neutestamentlichen Theologie und Zeitgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1966. 136–43

Jeremias, JoachimJerusalem in the Time of Jesus: An Investigation into Economic and Social Conditions during the Time of Jesus. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1969Google Scholar

Jeremias, JoachimNew Testament Theology. Part I. The Proclamation of Jesus. London: SCM Press, 1971Google Scholar

Jeremias, JoachimThe Parables of Jesus. Trans. S. H. Hooke. New York: Scribner's Sons, 1972Google Scholar

Jeremias, JoachimJesus' Promise to the Nations. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1982Google Scholar

Juel, Donald. Mark. Augsburg Commentary on the New Testament. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1990Google Scholar

Jülicher, Adolf. Die Gleichnisreden Jesu. 2nd edn. Tübingen: Mohr, 1910; orig. 1888Google Scholar

Kähler, Martin. The So-Called Historical Jesus and the Historic Biblical Christ. Trans. Carl E. Braaten. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1964; orig. 1892Google Scholar

Keck, Leander E. “Mk. 3,7–12 and Mark's Christology.” Journal of Biblical Literature 84 (1965): 341–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Keck, Leander E. “The Introduction to Mark's Gospel.” New Testament Studies 12 (1965–6): 352–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. “The Function of Scriptural Quotations and Allusions in Mark 11–16.” In Jesus und Paulus. Ed. Earle, E. Ellis and Grässer, E.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1975. 165–85Google Scholar

Kee, Howard ClarkCommunity of the New Age: Studies in Mark's Gospel. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1977Google Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark “Christology in Mark's Gospel.” In Judaisms and Their Messiahs at the Turn of the Christian Era. Ed. Jacob, Neusner, Green, W. S., and Freirichs, E. S.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987Google Scholar

Kelber, Werner. The Kingdom in Mark: A New Place and A New Time. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1974Google Scholar

Kelber, Werner, ed. The Passion in Mark. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1976Google Scholar

Kermode, Frank. The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979Google Scholar

Kertelge, K.Die Wunder Jesu im Markusevangelium. Eine redaktiongeschichtliche Untersuchung. Studien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 23. Munich: Kösel, 1970Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Jack Dean. Conflict in Luke: Jesus, Authorities, Disciples. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Jack DeanThe Christology of Mark's Gospel. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1994; orig. 1983Google Scholar

Kittel, Gerhard, and Gerhard, Friedrich. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Trans. and ed. Geoffrey, W. Bromiley. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1964–76Google Scholar

Klauck, Hans-Josef. Allegorie und Allegorese in synoptischen Gleichnistexten. Münster: Aschendorff, 1978Google Scholar

Klein, Günther. Die zwölf Apostel: Ursprung und Gehalt einer Idee. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1961Google Scholar

Koch, Dietrich-Alex. Die Bedeutung der Wundererzählungen für die Christologie des Markusevangeliums. New York: De Gruyter, 1975Google Scholar

Koester, Helmut. “The Sayings of Q and Their Image of Jesus.” In Sayings of Jesus: Canonical and Non-Canonical. Ed. William, L. Petersen, Johan, S. Vos, and Henk, J. De Jonge. Leiden: Brill, 1997. 137–54Google Scholar

Kuhn, Heinz-Wolfgang. Ältere Sammlungen in Markusevangelium. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1971Google Scholar

Kümmel, Werner Georg. Promise and Fulfillment: The Eschatological Message of Jesus. Trans. Dorthea M. Barton. Studies in Biblical Theology 23. London: SCM Press, 1961Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Jan. “Redaction and Theology in MK., IV.” In L'Evangile selon Marc: tradition et redaction. Ed. , M. Sabbe. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 34. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1974. 269–307Google Scholar

Lampe, Peter. “Die markinische Deutung des Gleichnisses vom Sämann, Markus 4, 10–12.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 65 (1974): 140–50Google Scholar

Lane, William L.The Gospel According to Mark. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974Google Scholar

Pinchas, Lapide. “A Jewish Exegesis of the Walking on the Water.” Trans. G. W. S. Knowles. Concilium 138 (1980): 35–40Google Scholar

Levenson, Jon D. Sinai and Zion: An Entry into the Jewish Bible. New Voices in Biblical Studies. Chicago, New York, Minneapolis: Winston Press, 1985Google Scholar

Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, S.. A Greek–English Lexicon with a Supplement. Oxford: Clarendon, 1968Google Scholar

Lohmeyer, Ernst. Das Evangelium des Markus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1951; orig. 1937Google Scholar

Loisy, Alfred Firmin. L'Evangile selon Marc. Paris: Emile Nourry, 1912Google Scholar

Lührmann, D.Das Markusevangelium. Handbuch zum Neuen Testament 3. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck), 1987Google Scholar

Lundbom, Jack R.Jeremiah 1–20. Anchor Bible 21A. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1999Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich. “Das Geheimnismotif und die markinische Christologie.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 56 (1965): 9–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich “The Disciples in the Gospel According to Matthew.” Trans. Robert Morgan. In The Interpretation of Matthew. Ed. Graham, Stanton. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1995. 115–48Google Scholar

Madden, Patrick J.Jesus' Walking on the Sea: An Investigation of the Origin of the Narrative Account. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 81. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1997CrossRef Google Scholar

Malbon, Elizabeth Struthers. “Fallible Followers: Women and Men in the Gospel of Mark.” Semeia 28 (1983): 29–48Google Scholar

Malbon, Elizabeth Struthers “The Jesus of Mark and the Sea of Galilee.” Journal of Biblical Literature 103 (1984): 363–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Malbon, Elizabeth Struthers “TE OIKIA AUTOU: Mark 2.15 in Context.” New Testament Studies 31 (1985): 282–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Malbon, Elizabeth StruthersIn the Company of Jesus: Characters in Mark's Gospel. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2000Google Scholar

Mánek, Jindrich. “Fishers of Men.” Novum Testamentum 2 (1957): 138–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Mann, C. S.Mark: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 27. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1986Google Scholar

Manson, T. WThe Teaching of Jesus: Studies of Its Form and Content. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1931Google Scholar

Manson, T. W.The Sayings of Jesus: As Recorded in the Gospels According to St. Matthew and St. Luke. London: SCM Press, 1949Google Scholar

Marcus, Joel. “Mark 4:10–12 and Marcan Epistemology.” Journal of Biblical Literature 103 (1984): 557–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcus, JoelThe Mystery of the Kingdom of God. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 90. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1986Google Scholar

Marcus, Joel “Entering into the Kingly Power of God.” Journal of Biblical Literature 107 (1988): 663–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcus, Joel “‘The Time Has Been Fulfilled!’ (Mark 1.15).” In Apocalyptic and the New Testament. Ed. Joel, Marcus and Marion, L. Soards. JSNTSup 24. Sheffield, England: JSOT Press, 1989. 49–68Google Scholar

Marcus, JoelThe Way of the Lord: Christological Exegesis of the Old Testament in the Gospel of Mark. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1992Google Scholar

Marcus, Joel “Blanks and Gaps in the Markan Parable of the Sower.” Biblical Interpretation 5 (1997): 247–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcus, JoelMark 1–8: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 27. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 2000Google Scholar

Marcus, Joel “Mark – Interpreter of Paul.” New Testament Studies 48 (2000): 473–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcus, Joel “Son of Man as Son of Adam. Part II: Exegesis.” Revue biblique 110 (2003): 370–86Google Scholar

Marshall, Christopher D.Faith as a Theme in Mark's Narrative. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 64. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989CrossRef Google Scholar

Marxsen, Willi. Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel. Trans. James Boyce, Donald Juel, and William Poehlmann. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1969Google Scholar

Matera, Frank J.What Are They Saying about Mark?New York: Paulist Press, 1987Google Scholar

Matera, Frank J. “The Prologue as the Interpretive Key to Mark's Gospel.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (1988): 3–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Matera, Frank J. “The Incomprehension of the Disciples and Peter's Confession.” Biblica 70 (1989): 153–72Google Scholar

Mauser, Ulrich. Christ in the Wilderness: The Wilderness Theme in the Second Gospel and Its Basis in the Biblical Tradition. London: SCM Press, 1963Google Scholar

Meier, John P.A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. 3 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1991–2001Google Scholar

Meier, John P. Mekilta deRabbi Ishamael. Ed. Lauterbach, J. Z.. 3 vols. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1933–5Google Scholar

Melbourne, Bertram L.Slow to Understand: The Disciples in Synoptic Perspective. Lanham, ND: University Press of America, 1988Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M.A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament. 3rd edn. London and New York: United Bible Societies, 1971Google Scholar

Meye, Robert P.Jesus and the Twelve: Discipleship and Revelation in Mark's Gospel. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1968Google Scholar

Moore, Stephen D.Literary Criticism and the Gospels: The Theoretical Challenge. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Moulton, James Hope. A Grammar of New Testament Greek. 3rd edn. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1930Google Scholar

Mussner, F. “Gottes herrschaft und Sendung Jesu nach Mk. 1, 14f. Zugleich ein Beitrag über die innere Struktur des Markusevangelium.” In Praesentia Salutis. Gesammelte Studien zu Fragen und Themen des Neuen Testaments. Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1967Google Scholar

Myers, Ched. Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark's Story of Jesus. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1988Google Scholar

Neirynck, Frans. Duality in Mark: Contributions to the Study of the Markan Redaction. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 31. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1972Google Scholar

Noth, Martin. “The Holy Ones of the Most High.” In The Laws in the Pentateuch and Other Studies. Trans. , D. R. Ap-Thomas.Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd; Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1966. 215–28Google Scholar

Öhler, Markus. “The Expectation of Elijah and the Presence of the Kingdom of God.” Journal of Biblical Literature 118 (1999): 461–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Origen, . On First Principles. Trans. G. W. Butterworth. London: SPCK, 1936; reprint, Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1973Google Scholar

Osburn, C. D. “The Historical Present in Mark as a Text-Critical Criterion.” Biblica 64 (1983): 486–500Google Scholar

Painter, John. Mark's Gospel: Worlds in Conflict. New Testament Readings. Ed. John Court. New York: Routledge, 1997Google Scholar

Painter, JohnPatrologia Latina. Ed. Jacques-Paul, Migne. Paris: Migne, 1844–64Google Scholar

Peisker, Carl Heinz. “Konsekutives ἵνα in Markus IV, 12.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 59 (1968): 126–7Google Scholar

Perkins, Pheme. “Mark.” In The New Interpreter's Bible. Vol. VIII. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1995. 507–733Google Scholar

Perrin, Norman. “The Christology of Mark: A Study in Methodology.” In A Modern Pilgrimage in New Testament Christology. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1974. 104–21Google Scholar

Pesch, Rudolf. “Levi-Matthäus (Mc 2,14/Mt 9,9; 10,3). Ein Beitrag zur Lösung eines alten Problems.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 59 (1968): 40–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Pesch, Rudolf “Ein Tag vollmächtige Wirkens Jesu in Kapharnaum (Mk. 1,21–34.35–39).” Bibel und Leben 9 (1968): 114–95Google Scholar

Pesch, RudolfDas Markusevangelium. 2 vols. Herders theologischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 2; Freiburg: Herder, 1976Google Scholar

Piper, Otto. “Unchanging Promises: Exodus in the New Testament.” Interpretation 11 (1957): 3–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Piper, Otto Pirqe deRabbi Eliezer. Ed. Frielander, G.. New York: Benjamin Blom, 1971Google Scholar

Power, E. “The Staff of the Apostles: A Problem in Gospel Harmony.” Biblica 4 (1923): 241–66Google Scholar

Quesnell, Quentin. The Mind of Mark: Interpretation and Method through the Exegesis of Mark 6,52. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1969Google Scholar

Räisänen, Heikki. The Idea of Divine Hardening: A Comparative Study of the Notion of Divine Hardening, Leading Astray and Inciting to Evil in the Bible and the Qur'an. Helsinki: Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, 1972Google Scholar

Räisänen, HeikkiDie Parabeltheorie im Markusevangelium. Helsinki: Finnische Exegetische Gesellschaft, 1973Google Scholar

Räisänen, HeikkiThe “Messianic Secret” in Mark's Gospel. Trans. Christopher Tuckett. Studies in the New Testament and Its World. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1990Google Scholar

Rajak, Tessa. “Dying for the Law: The Martyr's Portrait in Jewish-Greek Literature.” In The Jewish Dialogue with Greece and Rome: Studies in Cultural and Social Location. Leiden: Brill, 2001. 99–133Google Scholar

Reploh, Karl-Georg. Markus – Lehrer der Gemeinde: Eine redaktionsgeschichtliche Studie zu den Jüngerperikopen des Markus-Evangeliums. Stuttgarter biblische Monographien 9. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1969Google Scholar

Rhoads, David, and Donald, Michie. Mark as Story: An Introduction to the Narrative of a Gospel. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1982Google Scholar

Rhoads, David “Narrative Criticism and the Gospel of Mark.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 50 (1982): 411–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Robbins, Vernon K. “Mark 1.14–20: An Interpretation at the Intersection of Jewish and Graeco-Roman Traditions.” New Testament Studies 28 (1982): 220–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Robbins, Vernon K.Jesus the Teacher: A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984Google Scholar

Roth, Wolfgang. Hebrew Gospel: Cracking the Code of Mark. Oak Park, IL: Meyer-Stone Books, 1988Google Scholar

Sabbe, M., ed. L'Evangile selon Marc: tradition et rédaction. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 34. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1974Google Scholar

Sanders, E. P.Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1977Google Scholar

Robbins, Vernon K.Jesus and Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985Google Scholar

Schenke, L.Die Wundererzählungen des Markusevangeliums. Stuttgarter biblische Beiträge 5. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1974Google Scholar

Schmahl, Gunther. Die Zwölf im Markusevangelium. Trier: Paulinus, 1974Google Scholar

Schmidt, Daryl Dean. The Gospel of Mark with Introduction, Notes, and Original Text. Sonoma, CA: Polebridge Press, 1991Google Scholar

Schnackenburg, Rudolf. God's Rule and Kingdom. Trans. John Murray. Freiburg: Herder, 1963Google Scholar

Schneck, Richard. Isaiah in the Gospel of Mark, I–VIII. BIBAL Dissertation Series 1. Vallejo, CA: BIBAL Press, 1994Google Scholar

Schulz, Anselm. Nachfolgen und Nachahmen. Studien über das Verhältnis der neutestatmentlichen Jüngerschaft zur urchristlichen Vorbildethik. Studien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 6. Munich: Kösel-Verlag, 1962Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Albert. The Quest of the Historical Jesus: A Critical Study of Its Progress from Reimarus to Wrede. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998; orig. 1906Google Scholar

Schweitzer, AlbertThe Mysticism of Paul the Apostle. Trans. William Montgomery. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998; orig. 1931Google Scholar

Schweizer, Eduard. “Die theologische Leistung des Markus.” Evangelische Theologie 19 (1964): 337–55Google Scholar

Schweizer, EduardThe Good News According to Mark. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1970Google Scholar

Schweizer, Eduard “The Portrayal of the Life of Faith in the Gospel of Mark.” Interpretation 32 (1978): 387–99Google Scholar

Schweizer, Eduard A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. Ed. Schaff, P.et al. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1994; orig. 1887–94Google Scholar

Shiner, Whitney Taylor. Follow Me! Disciples in Markan Rhetoric. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 145. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1995Google Scholar

Smith, C. W. F. “Fishers of Men: Footnotes on a Gospel Figure.” Harvard Theological Review 52 (1959): 188–203CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, D. Moody. John among the Gospels. 2nd edn. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 2001Google Scholar

Snodgrass, K. R. “Streams of Tradition Emerging from Isaiah 40:1–5 and Their Adaptation in the New Testament.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 8 (1980): 24–45CrossRef Google Scholar

Snoy, Thierry. “La Rédaction marcienne de la marche sur les eaux (Mc. VI: 45–52).” Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses 44 (1968): 205–41, 433–81Google Scholar

Snoy, Thierry “Marc 6,48: ‘… et il voulait les dépasser.’ Proposition pour la solution d'une énigme.” In L'Evangile selon Marc: tradition et rédaction. Ed. Sabbe, M.. Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium 34. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1988; orig. 1974. 347–63Google Scholar

Sparks, H. F. D., ed. The Apocryphal Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984Google Scholar

Standaert, B. H. M. G. M.L'Evangile selon Marc. Composition et genre littéraire. Nijmegen: Stichting Studentenpers, 1978Google Scholar

Steele, Denise. “Having Root in the Self: Human Fruition and the Self-in-Relation in the Gospel of Mark.” Ph.D. diss., University of Glasgow, 2002

Stegner, William Richard. Narrative Theology in Early Jewish Christianity. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1989Google Scholar

Stegner, William Richard “Jesus' Walking on the Water: Mark 6.45–52.” In The Gospels and the Scriptures of Israel. Ed. Craig, A. Evans and Richard, W. Stegner. JSNTSup 104. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994. 212–34Google Scholar

Stein, Siegfried. “The Influence of Symposia Literature on the Literary Form of the Haggadah.” Journal of Jewish Studies 7 (1957): 13–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Steinmetz, David C. “The Superiority of Pre-critical Exegesis.” Theology Today 37 (1980): 27–38CrossRef Google Scholar

Stock, Klemens. Boten aus dem Mit-Ihm-Sein: Das Verhältnis zwischen Jesus und den Zwölf nach Markus. AnBib 70. Rome: Biblical Institute, 1975Google Scholar

Stone, C. F. III. “Allusion to Isa. 11.10 ⅬXX in Mark 10.42b.” New Testament Studies 48 (2002): 71–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Strathmann, H. “μαρτύριον.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament 4 (1967; orig. 1959): 502–3Google Scholar

Streeter, B. H.The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins. London: Macmillan, 1924Google Scholar

Stuhlmacher, Peter. Das paulinische Evangelium. Vorgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1968CrossRef Google Scholar

Swartley, Willard M. “The Structural Function of the Term ‘Way’ (Hodos) in Mark's Gospel.” In The New Way of Jesus: Essays Presented to Howard Charles. Ed. William, Klassen. Newton, KS: Faith and Life Press, 1980. 73–86Google Scholar

Tannehill, Robert C. “The Disciples in Mark: The Function of a Narrative Role.” Journal of Religion 57 (1977). 386–405CrossRef Google Scholar

Tannehill, Robert C.“The Gospel of Mark as Narrative Christology.” Semeia 16 (1979): 57–95Google Scholar

Taylor, Vincent. The Gospel According to Saint Mark: The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Indexes. 2nd edn. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1981; orig. 1950Google Scholar

Telford, William, ed. The Interpretation of Mark. 2nd edn. Issues in Religion and Theology 7. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1999; orig. 1977Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd. “Wanderradikalismus: Literatursoziologische Aspekte der Überlieferung von Worten Jesu im Urchristentum.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 70 (1973): 245–71Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd The Miracle Stories of the Early Christian Tradition. Trans. Francis McDonagh. Ed. John, Riches. Studies in the New Testament and Its World. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd Thesaurus linguae graecae: Canon of Greek Authors and Works. 2nd edn. Ed. Berkowitz, L. and Squiter, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986Google Scholar

Thompson, Mary R.The Role of Disbelief in Mark: A New Approach to the Second Gospel. New York: Paulist Press, 1989Google Scholar

Tolbert, Mary Ann. Sowing the Gospel: Mark's World in Literary-Historical Perspective. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989Google Scholar

Trocmé, Etienne. The Formation of the Gospel According to Mark. Trans. Pamela Gaughan. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1975Google Scholar

Tuckett, Christopher M., ed. The Messianic Secret. Issues in Religion and Theology 1. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983Google Scholar

Tuckett, ChristopherThe Revival of the Griesbach Hypothesis: An Analysis and Appraisal. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983CrossRef Google Scholar

Tyson, Joseph B. “The Blindness of the Disciples in Mark.” Journal of Biblical Literature 80 (1961): 261–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Vermes, Geza. Jesus the Jew: A Historian's Reading of the Gospels. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1981Google Scholar

Watts, Rikki E.Isaiah's New Exodus and Mark. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997Google Scholar

Weeden, Theodore J. “The Heresy that Necessitated Mark's Gospel.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 59 (1968): 145–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Weeden, Theodore J.Mark: Traditions in Conflict. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971Google Scholar

Weinfield, M. “Jeremiah and the Spiritual Metamorphosis of Israel.” Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 88 (1976): 17–56Google Scholar

Weiss, Johannes. Jesus' Proclamation of the Kingdom of God. Trans. and ed. Hiers, R. H. and Holland, D. L.. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971Google Scholar

Williams, Catrin H.I Am He: The Interpretation of “Anî HÛ” in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000Google Scholar

Windisch, Hans. “Die Verstockungsidee in Mk. 4:12 und das kausale ἵνα in der späteren Koine.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 26 (1927): 203–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben III. Jesus the Seer. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1999Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben IIIThe Gospel of Mark: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001Google Scholar

Wrede, William. The Messianic Secret. Trans. J. C. Grieg. Cambridge: James Clark, 1971; orig. 1901Google Scholar

Wuellner, Wilhelm H.The Meaning of “Fishers of Men.”Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1967Google Scholar

Zerwick, Maximilian. Biblical Greek. Trans. Joseph Smith. Rome: Pontifical Institute, 1963Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Heinrich. “Das absolute ἐγώ εἰμι als die neutestamentliche Offbarungsformel.” Biblische Zeitschrift 4 (1960): 266–76Google Scholar