Book contents
- Cicero’s Political Personae
- Cicero’s Political Personae
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Orator as Attacker
- Chapter 2 The Orator as Friend
- Chapter 3 The Orator as a Martyr
- Chapter 4 The Orator without Authority
- Chapter 5 The Champion of the Senate
- Chapter 6 The Popular Orator
- Chapter 7 The Voice of a Faction
- Chapter 8 A Great Man’s Spokesman
- Conclusion
- Works Cited
- Index locorum
- Index
- References
Book contents
- Cicero’s Political Personae
- Cicero’s Political Personae
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Orator as Attacker
- Chapter 2 The Orator as Friend
- Chapter 3 The Orator as a Martyr
- Chapter 4 The Orator without Authority
- Chapter 5 The Champion of the Senate
- Chapter 6 The Popular Orator
- Chapter 7 The Voice of a Faction
- Chapter 8 A Great Man’s Spokesman
- Conclusion
- Works Cited
- Index locorum
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cicero's Political Personae , pp. 228 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Works Cited
Achard, Guy. 1981. Pratique rhétorique et idéologie politique dans les discours “Optimates” de Cicéron. Mnemosyne Supplement 68. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ahl, Frederick. 1984. “The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome.” The American Journal of Philology 105 (2): 174–208.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael von. 2003. Cicero’s Style: A Synopsis Followed by Selected Analytic Studies. Mnemosyne Supplement 245. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael von 2010. “Caesar und die Macht des Wortes.” In Cesare: precursore o visionario? Atti del convegno internazionale Cividale di Friuli, 17–19 settembre 2009, edited by Urso, Gianpaolo, 223–40. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Alexander, Michael C. 1992. Review of Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik, by L. A. Burckhardt and Aufruhr und “Polizei” in der römischen Republik by Wilfried Nippel. The American Journal of Philology 113 (1): 140–3.Google Scholar
Alexander, Michael C. 2002. The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Walter. 1954. “Cicero’s Conceit.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 85: 121–44.Google Scholar
Altman, William H. F., ed. 2015. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Alwine, Andrew T. 2015. Enmity and Feuding in Classical Athens. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, William S. 1963. “Pompey, His Friends, and the Literature of the First Century b.c.” University of California Publications in Classical Philology 19 (1): 1–88.Google Scholar
Applbaum, Arthur Isak. 2000. Ethics for Adversaries: The Morality of Roles in Public and Professional Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arena, Valentina. 2012. Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arena, Valentina. 2016. “Popular Sovereignty in the Late Roman Republic: Cicero and the Will of the People.” In Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective, edited by Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin, 73–95. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, Jed W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Babcock, Charles L. 1965. “The Early Career of Fulvia.” The American Journal of Philology 86 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Badian, Ernst. 1996. “Tribuni Plebis and Res Publica.” In Imperium Sine Fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Late Roman Republic, ed. Linderski, Jerzy, 187–214. Historia Einzelschriften. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Balbo, Andrea. 2009. “Attività giudiziaria criminale e civile nello stato romano tra la fine della repubblica e i primi anni di Ottaviano (49–29 a.c.).” In La repressione criminale nella Roma repubblicana fra norma e persuasione, ed. Santalucia, Bernardo, 527–75. Pavia: IUSS Press.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1957. “Roman History, 58–56 b.c.: Three Ciceronian Problems.” The Journal of Roman Studies 47 (1/2): 15–20.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1960. “Auctoritas, Dignitas, Otium.” Classical Quarterly, 10 (1), 43–50.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1963. “The Commentariolum Petitionis.” Classical Quarterly, 13 (2), 242–50.Google Scholar
Baltussen, Han, and Davis, Peter J.. 2015. The Art of Veiled Speech: Self-Censorship from Aristophanes to Hobbes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baraz, Yelena. 2012. A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Shadi. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Batstone, William W. 1994. “Cicero’s Construction of Consular Êthos in the First Catilinarian.” Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974–) 124: 211–66.Google Scholar
Batstone, William W. 2009. “The Drama of Rhetoric at Rome.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, ed. Gunderson, Erik, 212–27. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Batstone, William W. 2010. “Caesar’s Republican Rhetoric and the Veils of Autocracy.” In Cesare: precursore o visionario? Atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 17–19 settembre 2009, ed. Urso, Gianpaolo, 181–206. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Batstone, William Wendell, and Damon, Cynthia. 2006. Caesar’s Civil War. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beard, Mary. 2012. “Cicero’s ‘Response of the Haruspices’ and the Voice of the Gods.” Journal of Roman Studies 102: 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellemore, Jane. 2005. “Cato’s Opposition to Caesar in 59 BC.” In Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, eds. Welch, Kathryn E. and Hillard, T. W., 225–78. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Benner, Herbert. 1987. Die Politik des P. Clodius Pulcher: Untersuchungen zur Denaturierung des Clientelwesens in der ausgehenden römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 50. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Bergemann, Claudia. 1992. Politik und Religion im spätrepublikanischen Rom. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Bernard, Jacques-Emmanuel. 2007. “Du discours à l’épistolaire: les échos du Pro Plancio dans la lettre de Cicéron à Lentulus Spinther (Fam. I, 9).” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 25 (3): 223–42.Google Scholar
Bernett, Monika. 1995. Causarum cognitio: Ciceros Analysen zur politischen Krise der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Berno, Francesca Romana. 2005. “Fuoco e fiamme su Cicerone. Il personaggio di Clodio nella De domo sua.” Pan 23: 113–29.Google Scholar
Berno, Francesca Romana. 2007. “La Furia di Clodio in Cicerone.” Bolettino di studi latini 37 (1): 69–91.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Neil W. 2017. “Persona, Identity, and Self-Presentation in Roman Declamation.” In Self-Presentation and Identity in the Roman World, ed. Gavrielatos, Andreas, 1–16. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. 1993. “Pompey’s Legal Knowledge – Or Lack of It: Cic. Mil. 70 and the Date of Pro Milone.” Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 42 (4): 502–4.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1991. Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London; Newbury Park; New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bishop, Caroline. 2018. Cicero, Greek Learning, and the Making of a Roman Classic. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bleicken, Jochen. 1955. Das Volkstribunat der klassischen Republik: Studien zu seiner Entwicklung zwischen 287 und 133 v. Chr. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Bleicken, Jochen. 1962. Senatsgericht und Kaisergericht. Eine Studie zur Entwicklung des Prozessrechtes im frühen Principat. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Phil.-hist. Kl., 3rd series, No. 53. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Blom, Henriette van der. 2010. Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford Classical Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blom, Henriette van der 2011. “Pompey in the Contio.” Classical Quarterly 61 (2): 553–73.Google Scholar
Blom, Henriette van der 2014. “Character Attack and Invective Speech in the Roman Republic: Cicero as Target.” In Character Assassination throughout the Ages, eds. Icks, Martijn and Shiraev, Eric, 37–57. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.Google Scholar
Blom, Henriette van der 2016. Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blom, Henriette van der 2017. “Elite Rhetoric and Self-Presentation: Metellus Numidicus Returns.” In The Theatre of Justice: Aspects of Performance in Greco-Roman Oratory, eds. Papaioannou, Sophia, Serafim, Andreas, and da Vela, Beatrice, 114–32. Mnemosyne Supplement 403. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. Martin. 1997a. “Schooling in Persona: Imagination and Subordination in Roman Education.” Classical Antiquity 16 (1): 57–78.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. Martin. 1997b. Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. Martin. 1997c. “A Preface to the History of Declamation: Whose Speech? Whose History?” In The Roman Cultural Revolution, eds. Habinek, Thomas and Schiesaro, Alessandro, 199–215. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. Martin. 2010. “Roman Declamation: The Elder Seneca and Quintilian.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon, 297–306. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. Martin. 2011. The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blösel, Wolfgang. 2011. “Die Demilitarisierung der römischen Nobilität von Sulla bis Caesar.” In Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana. Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, Wolfgang and Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim, 55–80. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Bonnefond-Coudry, Marianne. 1989. Le sénat et la République romaine: De la guerre d’Hannibal à Auguste : pratiques délibératives et prise de décision. Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
Bonner, Stanley Frederick. 1949. Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Bonsangue, Valentina. 2013. “L’irosa eloquenza delle strumae.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 31 (1): 58–72.Google Scholar
Booth, Joan. 2007. Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Botermann, Helga. 1968. Die Soldaten und die römische Politik in der Zeit von Caesars Tod bis zur Begründung des zweiten Triumvirats. Vol. 46. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Botermann, Helga. 1992. “Die Generalabrechnung mit dem Tyrannen. Ciceros Rede für den König Deiotarus.” Gymnasium 99: 320–44.Google Scholar
Botsford, George Willis. 1909. The Roman Assemblies from Their Origin to the End of the Republic. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
Bradley, James R. 1991. The Sources of Cornelius Nepos: Selected Lives. Harvard Dissertations in Classics. New York: Garland Pub.Google Scholar
Braund, Susanna Morton. 1998. “Praise and Protreptic in Early Imperial Panegyric: Cicero, Seneca, Pliny.” In The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity, ed. Whitby, Mary, 53–76. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. Corey. 2012. “Perceptions of Women’s Power in the Late Republic: Terentia, Fulvia, and the Generation of 63 BCE.” In A Companion to Women in the Ancient World, ed. James, Sharon L. and Dillon, Sheila, 354–66. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bringmann, Klaus. 1971. Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero. Hypomnemata: Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben 29. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Bringmann, Klaus. 1986. “Der Diktator Caesar als Richter? Zu Ciceros Reden ‘Pro Ligario’ und ‘Pro rege Deiotaro.’” Hermes 114 (1): 72–88.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1965. “‘Amicitia’ in the Late Roman Republic.” The Cambridge Classical Journal 11: 1–20.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1982. “The Legal Issue in Cicero, Pro Balbo.” The Classical Quarterly 32 (1): 136–47.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1984. “The Role of the Senate in the Augustan Regime.” The Classical Quarterly 34 (2): 423–44.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1986. “Cicero’s Officium in the Civil War.” The Journal of Roman Studies 76: 12–32.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1988. The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. 1957. Humanitas Romana: Studien über Werke und Wesen der Römer. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. 1962. “Der Tyrann und sein Gegenbild in Ciceros ‘Staat.’” In Studien zur römischen Literatur. Vol. ii. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Leonhard Alexander. 1988. Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik. Historia, Einzelschriften 57. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Burgers, Peter. 1999. “The Role and Function of Senatorial Debate: The Case of the Reign of Tiberius AD 14–37.” Latomus 58 (3): 564–73.Google Scholar
Cape, Robert W., Jr. 1995. “The Rhetoric of Politics in Cicero’s Fourth Catilinarian.” The American Journal of Philology 116 (2): 255–77.Google Scholar
Cerami, Pietro. 1998. “‘Accusatores Populares’, ‘delatores’, ‘indices’. Tipologia dei ‘collaboratori di giustizia’ nell’antica Roma.” Annali del Seminario Giuridico dell’Università di Palermo 45: 141–79.Google Scholar
Cerutti, Steven. 1994. “Further Discussion on the Delivery and Publication of Cicero’s Second Philippic.” The Classical Bulletin 70 (1): 23–8.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. 2001. “La ‘construction’ des aspirants à la tyrannie: Sp. Cassius, Sp. Maelius et Manlius Capitolinus.” In L’invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique. Die Konstruktion der grossen Männer Altroms, eds. Coudry, Marianne and Späth, Thomas, 83–96. Actes du Colloque du Collegium Beatus Rhenanus, Août 16–18 Septembre 1999. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Christenson, David. 2004. “Unbearding Morality: Appearance and Persuasion in Pro Caelio.” The Classical Journal 100 (1): 61–72.Google Scholar
Christian, Emily. 2008. “A Philosophy of Legitimacy in Cicero’s Philippics.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, Tom and Wilson, Marcus, 37: 153–67. Prudentia. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Cipriani, G. 1977. “La Pro Marcello e il suo significato come orazione politica.” Atene e Roma 22: 113–25.Google Scholar
Clark, Mark Edward, and Ruebel, James S.. 1985. “Philosophy and Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Milone.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, neue Folge 128 (1): 57–72.Google Scholar
Classen, Carl Joachim. 1985. Recht, Rhetorik, Politik: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros rhetorischer Strategie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Clemente, Guido. 2018. “When the Senators Became ‘The Best.’” In Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. Henriette van der Blom, Christa Gray, and Catherine Steel, 203–21. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, Joy. 2007. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, Joy. 2011. “Fantastical Realism in Cicero’s Postwar Panegyric.” In Dicere Laudes: Elogio, Comunicazione, Creazione del Consenso: Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 23–25 Settembre 2010, ed. Urso, Gianpaolo, 161–78. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Connolly, Joy. 2015. The Life of Roman Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corbeill, Anthony. 1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corbeill, Anthony. 2002. “Ciceronian Invective.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, James M., 197–217. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Corbeill, Anthony. 2008. “O Singulare Prodigium: Ciceronian Invective as a Religious Expiation.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, Tom and Wilson, Marcus, 37: 214–39. Prudentia. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Corbeill, Anthony. 2010. “The Function of a Divinely Inspired Text in Cicero’s De Haruspicum Responsis.” In Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, Andrew, 139–54. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbeill, Anthony. 2018. “Clodius’ Contio de Haruspicum Responsis.” In Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions, eds. Gray, Christa, Andrea Balbo, Richard M. Marshall, A, and Steel, Catherine E. W., 171–90. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornwell, Hannah. 2017. Pax and the Politics of Peace: Republic to Principate. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Correa, S. 2017. “Consolatio, Memoria e Identidad en las Cartas de Cicerón a Exiliados Pompeyanos del Año 46 AC (Cic fam. 4 y 6).” Athenaeum: Studi di letteratura e storia dell’antichità, no. 2: 551–68.Google Scholar
Cottam, Martha L., Mastors, Elena, Preston, Thomas, and Dietz, Beth. 2015. Introduction to Political Psychology: 3rd Edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coudry, Marianne. 2019. “Electoral Bribery and the Challenge to the Authority of the Senate: Two Aspects of Dio’s View of the Late Roman Republic (Books 36–40).” In Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic, edited by Osgood, Josiah and Baron, Christopher, 36–49. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Coudry, Marianne, and Späth, Thomas, eds. 2001. L’invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique. Die Konstruktion der grossen Männer Altroms. Actes du Colloque du Collegium Beatus Rhenanus, Août, 16–18 septembre 1999. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Cousin, Jean. 1962. Discours: Tome XV, Pour Caelius, Sur les provinces consulaires, Pour Balbus. Collection des Universités de France. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 1981. “The Accusator as Amicus: An Original Roman Tactic of Ethical Argumentation.” Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974–) 111 (January): 31–7.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 1984. “The Central Argument of Cicero’s Speech for Ligarius.” The Classical Journal 79 (3): 193–9.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 1990. “Cicero’s Strategy of Embarrassment in the Speech for Plancius.” The American Journal of Philology 111 (1): 75–81.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 1993. Form as Argument in Cicero’s Speeches: A Study of Dilemma. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 2001. “Shifting Charge and Shifty Argument in Cicero’s Speech for Sestius.” In The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome: Essays in Honor of George A. Kennedy, ed. Wooten, Cecil W., 111–22. Mnemosyne Supplement 225. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 2002. “Selected Recent Work on Rhetorica and Speeches.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, James M., 503–31. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 2004. “Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof.” In Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, Jonathan and Paterson, Jeremy, 187–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 2008. “Treating Oratio Figurata in Cicero’s Speeches: The Case of Pro Marcello.” In Papers on Rhetoric IX, ed. Montefusco, Lucia Calboli, 91–106. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 2010. “Cicero as Orator.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon, 264–84. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 2014. “Rhetorical Expectations and Self-Fashioning in Cicero’s Speech for P. Sulla, §§18–19.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 32 (3): 211–21.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. 2017. “Divine and Human in Cicero’s De Provinciis Consularibus.” In Ab omni parte beatus: Classical Essays in Honor of James M. May, ed. Groton, Anne H., 97–120. Mundelein, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.Google Scholar
Crawford, Jane W. 1984. The Lost and Unpublished Orations. Hypomnemata: Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben 80. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Crawford, Jane W. 2017. “Cicero’s Correspondence with Caesar: Two Sides of the Story.” In Ab omni parte beatus: Classical Essays in Honor of James M. May, ed. Groton, Anne H., 181–200. Mundelein, il: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. 1995. Legal Advocacy in the Roman World. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Culham, Phyllis. 1984. “Tablets and Temples: Documents in Republican Rome.” Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists 2 (2): 3.Google Scholar
Culham, Phyllis. 1989. “Archives and Alternatives in Republican Rome.” Classical Philology 84 (2): 100–15.Google Scholar
Cuny-le Callet, Blandine. 2003. “Un aspect du thème de la monstruosité morale dans la rhétorique cicéronienne: le monstre comme prodige et causeur de prodiges.” In Argumentation et discours politique: Antiquité grecque et latine, Révolution française, monde contemporain, eds. Bonnafous, Simone, Chiron, Pierre, Ducard, Dominique, and Levy, Carlos, 203–12. Paris: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
David, Jean-Michel. 1980. “Maiorum exempla sequi: l’exemplum historique dans les discours judiciaires de Cicerón.” Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome. Moyen-Age, Temps modernes 92 (1): 67–86.Google Scholar
David, Jean-Michel. 1992. Le patronat judiciaire au dernier siècle de la République romaine. Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 277. Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
David, Jean-Michel, Demougin, Ségolène, and Deniaux, Élizabeth. 1973. “Le Commentariolum Petitionis de Quintus Cicéron: état de la question et étude prosopographique.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt i (3): 239–77.Google Scholar
Dawes, Tia. 2014. “Strategies of Persuasion in Philippics 10 and 11.” Classical Quarterly 64: 241–53.Google Scholar
De Angelis, Francesco. 2010. “Ius and Space: An Introduction.” In Spaces of Justice in the Roman World, 1–25. Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition 35. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
De Lacy, Phillip H. 1977. “The Four Stoic Personae.” Illinois Classical Studies 2: 163–72.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, M. H. 1992. Perdita Iuventus. Zwischen den Generationen von Caesar und Augustus. Vestigia 44. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Dobesch, Gerhard. 1985. “Politische Bemerkungen zu Ciceros Rede pro Marcello.” In Römische Geschichte, Altertumskunde und Epigraphik: Festschrift für Artur Betz zur Vollendung seines 80. Lebensjahres, eds. Weber, E and Dobesch, G, 153–231. Wien: Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Archäologie.Google Scholar
Dressler, Alex. 2016. Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dufallo, Basil. 2001. “Appius’ Indignation: Gossip, Tradition, and Performance in Republican Rome.” Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974–2014) 131: 119–42.Google Scholar
Dugan, John. 2001. “How to Make (and Break) a Cicero: Epideixis, Textuality, and Self-Fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem.” Classical Antiquity 20 (1): 35–77.Google Scholar
Dugan, John. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, John. 2009. “Rhetoric and the Roman Republic.” In Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, ed. Gunderson, Erik, 178–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, John. 2013. “Cicero and the Politics of Ambiguity: Interpreting the Pro Marcello.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. van der Blom, Henriette and Steel, Catherine, 211–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, John. 2014. “Non sine causa sed sine fine: Cicero’s Compulsion to Repeat His Consulate.” The Classical Journal 110 (1): 9–22.Google Scholar
Duplá Ansuategui, Antonio. 2017. “Incitement to Violence in Late Republican Political Oratory.” In Political Communication in the Roman World, ed. Rosillo-López, Cristina, 179–200. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew R. 1998. “Narrative Obfuscation, Philosophical Topoi, and Tragic Patterning in Cicero’s Pro Milone.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98: 219–41.Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew R. 2002. “The ‘Other’ Pro Milone Reconsidered.” Philologus 146 (1): 182–5.Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew R. 2004a. “Cicero’s Devotio: The Rôles of Dux and Scape-Goat in His Post Reditum Rhetoric.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 102: 299–314.Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew R. 2004b. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew R. 2008. Cicero: Catilinarians. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyer, R. R. 1990. “Rhetoric and Intention in Cicero’s Pro Marcello.” Journal of Roman Studies 80: 17–30.Google Scholar
Earl, Donald C. 1967. The Moral and Political Tradition of Rome. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1977. Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eder, Walter. 1991. “Who Rules? Power and Participation in Athens and Rome.” In City States in Classical and Medieval Italy, Ann Arbor, eds. Molho, Anthony, Raaflaub, Kurt A., and Emlen, Julia, 169–96. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Edwards, Catharine. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, David F. 1987. Personal Enmity in Roman Politics, 218–43 b.c. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard. 2008. “Phantoms in the Philippics: Catiline, Clodius and Antonian Parallels.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, Tom and Wilson, Marcus, 37: 62–81. Prudentia. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine. 1975. “The Trials of Gabinius in 54 BC.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, no. H. 3: 425–43.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine. 2004. The Roman World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Favory, F. 1976. “Classes dangereuses et crise de l’état dans le discours cicéronien d’après les écrits de Cicéron de 57 à 52.” In Texte, politique, idéologie: Cicéron, 109–233. Annales littéraires de l’Université de Besançon 187. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Ferrary, Jean-Louis. 1997. “Optimates et Populares: Le problème du rôle de l’idéologie dans la politique.” In Die späte römische Republik/La fin de la republique romain: Un débat franco-allemand d’histoire et d’historiographie, eds. Bruhns, Hinnerk, David, Jean-Michel, and Nippel, Wilfried, 221–31. Collection de l’École Française de Rome 235. Palais Farnése: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
Ferrary, Jean-Louis, and Scheid, John, eds. 2015. Il princeps romano: autocrate o magistrato? Fattori giuridici e fattori sociali del potere imperiale da Augusto a Commodo. Pavia: IUSS.Google Scholar
Ferriès, Marie-Claire. 2012. “L’ombre de César dans la politique du consul Marc Antoine.” In César sous Auguste, eds. Devillers, Olivier and Sion-Jenkis, Karin, 43–54. Ausonius Éditions, Scripta Antiqua 48. Bordeaux: Diffusion de Boccard.Google Scholar
Fertik, Harriet. 2017. “Sex, Love, and Leadership in Cicero’s Philippics 1 and 2.” Arethusa 50 (1): 65–88.Google Scholar
Fezzi, Luca. 2001. “La legislazione tribunizia di Publio Clodio Pulcro (58 ac) e la ricerca del consenso a Roma.” Studi Classici e Orientali 47 (1): 245–340.Google Scholar
Fiore, Benjamin. 1997. “The Theory and Practice of Friendship in Cicero.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T., 59–76. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. 2003. Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten, und Herrschaft im alten Rom. Historische Semantik, Band 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, Lynn. 2006. “Cicero’s Fear: Multiple Readings of Pro Milone 1–4.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 57: 63–83.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, Lynn. 2007. “Having Your Cake and Eating It: How Cicero Combines Arguments.” In Logos: Rational Argument in Classical Rhetoric, ed. Powell, Jonathan, 69–90. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 96. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, Lynn. 2015. “Plutarch and Dio on Cicero at the Trial of Milo.” In Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography, eds. Ash, Rhiannon, Mossman, Judith, and Titchener, Frances B., 193–208. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, Lynn S. 2013. Persuasive Language in Cicero’s Pro Milone: A Close Reading and Commentary. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Fraisse, Jean-Claude. 1974. Philia: la notion d’amitié dans la philosophie antique. Bibliothèque d’histoire de la philosophie. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Frisch, Hartvig. 1946. Cicero’s Fight for the Republic: The Historical Background of Cicero’s Philippics. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Manfred. 1992. Cicero and the Roman Republic. Translated by W. E. Yuill. Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, Laurel. 2013. “Cicero’s Palinode: Inconsistency in the Late Republic.” Greece and Rome 60 (2): 246–61.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, Paola. 1997. Il dissenso e l’ironia: per una rilettura delle orazioni “cesariane” di Cicerone. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Gambet, D. G. 1970. “Cicero in the Works of Seneca Philosophus.” In Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 101: 171–83.Google Scholar
Ganter, Angela. 2017. “Patronus und Amicus. Ciceros Tränen als grundlage sozialer Integration.” Ciceroniana online 1 (2).Google Scholar
Garcea, Alessandro. 2004. “Le langage des émotions dans les lettres d’exil de Cicéron.” In Epistulae Antiquae iii: Actes du IIIe colloque international L’épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens. Université François-Rabelais, Tours, 25–27 septembre 2002, eds. Nadjo, Léon and Gavoille, Élisabeth, 153–67. Louvain; Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Garcea, Alessandro, and Lomanto, Valeria. 2014. “Hortensius dans le Brutus: une polémique rhétorique sous forme d’éloge funèbre.” In Le Brutus de Cicéron: rhétorique, politique et histoire culturelle, eds. Aubert-Baillot, Sophie and Guérin, Charles, 141–60. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. 2009. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Geffcken, Katherine A. 1973. Comedy in the Pro Caelio: With an Appendix on the In Clodium et Curionem. Wauconda, il: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.Google Scholar
Gelzer, Matthias. 1937. “Die Datierung von Ciceros Rede de Haruspicum Responso.” Klio 30 (30): 1–9.Google Scholar
Gelzer, Matthias. 1968. Cicero und Caesar. Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt-Am-Main 7, No. 1. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
George, David B. 1991. “Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic.” Classical Antiquity 10 (2): 237–58.Google Scholar
Gerrish, Jennifer. 2018. “Heroic Resonances in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum 5.” Classical World 111 (3): 351–70.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, Ingo. 2007a. Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge Classical Journal: Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, Supplementary Volume 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, Ingo. 2007b. “Greek Auxiliaries: Tragedy and Philosophy in Ciceronian Invective.” In Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, ed. Booth, Joan, 149–82. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, Ingo. 2011. Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, Ingo. 2018. “Epistolary Communities in Cicero, 49–44 bce.” In Letters and Communities: Studies in the Socio-Political Dimensions of Ancient Epistolography, edited by Ceccarelli, Paola, Doering, Lutz, Fögen, Thorsten, and Gildenhard, Ingo, 205–38. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. 1988. “Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero’s De Officiis i.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Annas, Julia, 169–99. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gladhill, Bill. 2018. “Women from the Rostra: Fulvia and the Pro Milone.” In Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions, eds. Gray, Christa, Andrea Balbo, Richard M. Marshall, A, and Catherine, E. W. Steel, 297–308. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goar, R. J. 1987. The Legend of Cato Uticensis from the First Century b.c. to the Fifth Century a. d. Collection Latomus 197. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gómez Santamaría, Isabel. 2007. “El ‘Pro Marcello’ y el equívoco lenguaje de la resistencia ante el poder.” In Mvnvs qvaesitvm meritis: homenaje a Carmen Codoñer, eds. Merino, Carmen Codoñer, Andrés, Gregorio Hinojo, and Hinojo, José Corte, Fernández, 387–94. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Görler, Woldemar. 1988. “From Athens to Tusculum: Gleaning the Background of Cicero’s De Oratore.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 6 (3): 215–35.Google Scholar
Gotoff, Harold C. 1986. “Cicero’s Analysis of the Prosecution Speeches in the Pro Caelio: An Exercise in Practical Criticism.” Classical Philology 81 (2): 122–32.Google Scholar
Gotoff, Harold C. 1993. Cicero’s Caesarian Speeches: A Stylistic Commentary. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gotoff, Harold C. 2002. “Cicero’s Caesarian Orations.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, James M., 219–71. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Gotter, Ulrich. 1996. Der Diktator ist tot!: Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des zweiten Triumvirats. Historia Einzelschriften 110. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Gowing, Alain M. 2013. “Tully’s Boat: Responses to Cicero in the Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, ed. Steel, Catherine, 233–50. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1973. Sir Walter Ralegh: The Renaissance Man and His Roles. First Edition. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam. 1986a. “Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: i.” Greece & Rome, Second Series 33 (1): 64–77.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam. 1986b. “Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: ii.” Greece & Rome, Second Series 33 (2): 192–202.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam. 1997. “The Composition of the Academica: Motives and Versions.” In Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books: proceedings of the 7th Symposium Hellenisticum (Utrecht, August 21–25, 1995), eds. Inwood, B and Mansfield, J., 1–35. Leiden; New York: Brill.Google Scholar
Grilli, Alberto. 2005. “Populus in Cicerone.” In Popolo e potere nel mondo antico, ed. Urso, Gianpaolo, 123–40. Atti del convegno internazionale Cividale del Friuli, 23–25 settembre 2004. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Grillo, Luca. 2012. The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grillo, Luca. 2015. Cicero’s De Provinciis Consularibus Oratio. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grillo, Luca. 2016. “The Artistic Architecture and Closural Devices of Cicero’s Ad Familiares 1 and 6.” Arethusa 49 (3): 399–413.Google Scholar
Gruen, Erich. 1969. “Pompey, the Roman Aristocracy, and the Conference of Luca.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 18 (1): 71–108.Google Scholar
Gruen, Erich. 1974. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, Erich. 1996. “P. Clodius: Instrument or Independent Agent.” Phoenix 20: 120–30.Google Scholar
Guerin, Charles. 2009. Persona. L’élaboration d’une notion rhétorique au Ier siècle av. J.-C. Volume I: Antécédents grecs et première rhétorique latine. Textes et traditions 18. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Erik. 2000. Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Habicht, Christian. 1990. Cicero the Politician. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, Thomas N. 1990. “Towards a History of Friendly Advice: The Politics of Candor in Cicero’s De Amicitia.” Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 23 (4): 165–85.Google Scholar
Habinek, Thomas, and Schiesaro, Alessandro, eds. 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Edith. 2006. The Theatrical Cast of Athens: Interactions between Ancient Greek Drama and Society. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. 2002. “The Philippics.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, James M., 273–304. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. 2008. “The Rhetorical Design and Success of Cicero’s Twelfth Philippic.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric, Ideology, eds. Wilson, Marcus and Stevenson, Tom, 282–304. Prudentia 37–8. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. 2009a. “Serving the Times: Cicero and Caesar the Dictator.” In Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, eds. Dominik, William J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. A., 89–110. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. 2009b. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. 2013. “Saviour of the Republic and Father of the Fatherland: Cicero and Political Crisis.” In Cambridge Companion to Cicero, ed. Catherine, E. W. Steel, 215–29. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. 2014. Cicero’s Use of Judicial Theater. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Haller, B. 1967. “C. Asinius Pollio als Politiker und zeitkritischer Historiker.” Diss. Münster.Google Scholar
Hanchey, Daniel. 2013. “Typically Unique: Shared Strategies in Cicero’s Pro Archia and Pro Balbo.” The Classical Journal 108 (2): 159–86.Google Scholar
Hardimon, Michael O. 1994. “Role Obligations.” The Journal of Philosophy 91 (7): 333–63.Google Scholar
Hariman, Robert. 1995. Political Style: The Artistry of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill. 2004. “Cicero and the Law.” In Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, Jonathan and Paterson, Jeremy, 147–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill. 2006. Cicero and the Jurists: From Citizen’s Law to the Lawful State. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Harrison, Ian. 2008. “Catiline, Clodius, and Popular Politics at Rome during the 60s and 50s bce.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 51: 95–118.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, Joseph. 1963. Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Publications de la Faculté de Lettres et Sciences humaines de l’Université de Lille, XI. Paris: Société d’édition “Les belles lettres.”Google Scholar
Henderson, John. 1997. “Polishing off the Politics: Horace’s Ode to Pollio, 2.1.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 37: 59–136.Google Scholar
Hickson-Hahn, Frances. 1998. “What’s So Funny?: Laughter and Incest in Invective Humor.” Syllecta Classica 9 (1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Louise. 2017. Res Publica and the Roman Republic: “Without Body or Form.” Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim. 2010. Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Translated by Henry Heitmann-Gordon. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim. 2011a. “Self-Serving Sermons: Oratory and the Self-Construction of the Republican Aristocrat.” In Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, Christopher and Covino, Ralph, 17–34. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim. 2011b. “The Roman Republic as Theatre of Power: The Consuls as Leading Actors.” In Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, Hans, Duplá, Antonio, Jehne, Martin, and Polo, Francisco Pina, 161–81. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim. 2013. “Friends, Romans, Countrymen: Addressing the Roman People and the Rhetoric of Inclusion.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. van der Blom, Henriette and Steel, Catherine, 11–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. Rice. 1920. “Cicero’s Παλινω̨δία and Questions Therewith Connected.” The Classical Quarterly 14 (1): 39–45.Google Scholar
Hurlet, Frédéric. 2010. “Pouvoirs extraordinaires et tromperie: La tentation de la monarchie à la fin de la République romaine (82–44 av. J.C.).” In Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Despotism and Deceit in the Graeco-Roman World, eds. Turner, Andrew J., Chong-Gossard, K. O., and Vervaet, Frederik Juliaan, 107–30. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Hurlet, Frédéric. 2014. “Les métamorphoses de l’imperium de la République au Principat.” Pallas. Revue d’études antiques, no. 96: 13–33.Google Scholar
Jacotot, Mathieu. 2014. “De re publica esset silentium: Pensée politique et histoire de l’éloquence.” In Le Brutus de Cicéron: rhétorique, politique et histoire culturelle, eds. Aubert-Baillot, Sophie and Guérin, Charles, 193–214. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Jarratt, Susan C. 2019. Chain of Gold: Greek Rhetoric in the Roman Empire. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Jarratt, Susan C., and Reynolds, Nedra. 1994. “The Splitting Image: Contemporary Feminisms and the Ethics of Êthos.” In Êthos: New Essays in Rhetorical and Critical Theory, eds. Baumlin, James S. and Baumlin, Tita French, 37–63. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
Jehne, Martin. 1995. Demokratie in Rom?: die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Jehne, Martin. 2006. “Who attended Roman assemblies? Some remarks on political participation in the Roman Republic.” In Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, eds. Simón, Francisco Marco, Rodríguez, José Remesal, and Polo, Francisco Pina, 221–34. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat Barcelona.Google Scholar
Jehne, Martin. 2017. “Why the Anti-Caesarians Failed: Political Communication on the Eve of Civil War (51 to 49 bc).” Political Communication in the Roman World. Impact of Empire, 27: 201–27.Google Scholar
John, Oliver P., Robins, Richard W., and Pervin, Lawrence A., eds. 2010. Handbook of Personality, Third Edition: Theory and Research. Third edition. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1970. “Cicero’s Cato.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, neue Folge 113 (2/3): 188–96.Google Scholar
Kapust, Daniel. 2018. Flattery and the History of Political Thought. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karataş, Sema. 2019. Zwischen Bitten und Bestechen: Ambitus in der politischen Kultur der römischen Republik – Der Fall des Cn. Plancius. Hermes Einzelschriften 115. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. 1998. “Becoming ‘CICERO.’” In Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, eds. Knox, P. and Foss, C., 248–63. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. 2001. “Controlling Reason: Declamation in Rhetorical Education at Rome.” In Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, edited by Too, Yun Lee, 317–37. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. 2006. Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Clarendon Ancient History Series. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Catherine. 2015. Juvenal and the Satiric Emotions. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keeline, Thomas J. 2018. The Reception of Cicero in the Early Roman Empire: The Rhetorical Schoolroom and the Creation of a Cultural Legend. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. 1968a. “Antony’s Speech at Caesar’s Funeral.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 54 (2): 99–106.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. 1968b. “The Rhetoric of Advocacy in Greece and Rome.” The American Journal of Philology 89 (4): 419–36.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 b.c.–300 a.d. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kenty, Joanna. 2017. “Messalla Corvinus: Augustan Orator, Ciceronian Statesman.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 35 (4): 445–74.Google Scholar
Kenty, Joanna. 2018. “The Political Context of Cicero’s Oration De Domo Sua.” Ciceroniana on Line 2 (2).Google Scholar
Kenty, Joanna. 2021. “Divided Audience and Figured Speech in Cicero’s Pro Balbo.” American Journal of Philology.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, Wilhelm. 1978. “Ciceros Cato: Überlegungen zu einer verlorenen Schrift Ciceros.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 121 (H. 2): 167–184.Google Scholar
Knight, Jayne Elizabeth. 2015. “The Politics of Anger in Roman Society: A Study of Orators and Emperors, 70 bce–68 ce.” Diss. University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Kondratieff, Eric J. 2012. “Tribuni Plebis.” In The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, ed. Bagnall, Roger S.. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Konstan, David. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Konstan, David. 2005. “Friendship and Patronage.” In A Companion to Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, Stephen, 345–59. Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Köster, Isabel K. 2014. “Feasting Centaurs and Destructive Consuls in Cicero’s In Pisonem.” Illinois Classical Studies, no. 39: 63–79.Google Scholar
Koster, Severin. 1980. Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain.Google Scholar
Krostenko, Brian A. 2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krostenko, Brian A. 2005. “Style and Ideology in the Pro Marcello.” In Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, eds. Welch, Kathryn and Hillard, T. W., 279–312. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Kubiak, David P. 1989. “Piso’s Madness (Cic. in Pis. 21 and 47).” The American Journal of Philology 110 (2): 237–45.Google Scholar
Kumaniecki, Kazimierz. 1960. Cicero Mensch – Politiker – Schriftsteller. Warszawa: Państwowe wydawnictwo naukowe.Google Scholar
Kumaniecki, Kazimierz. 1970. “Ciceros Cato.” In Forschungen zur römischen Literatur. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Büchner., ed. Wimmel, Walter, 168–88. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Kurczyk, Stephanie. 2006. Cicero und die Inszenierung der eigenen Vergangenheit. Cologne; Weimar; Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
La Bua, Giuseppe. 2019. Cicero and Roman Education: The Reception of the Speeches and Ancient Scholarship. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, W. K. 1961. “The Tribunate of Curio.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 10 (3): 318–29.Google Scholar
Langerwerf, Lydia. 2015. “‘To Have Daring Is like a Barrier’: Cicero and Sallust on Catiline’s Audacia.” Greece & Rome (Second Series) 62 (2): 155–66.Google Scholar
Larsen, Julian. 2008. “Cicero, Antony, and the Senatus Consultum Ultimum in the Second Philippic.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, Tom and Wilson, Marcus, 37:168–80. Prudentia. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Laser, Günter. 1997. Populo et scaenae serviendum est: Die Bedeutung der städtischen Masse in der späten römischen Republik. Bochumer altertumswissenschaftliches Colloquium 29. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Lazenby, J. F. 1959. “The Conference of Luca and the Gallic War: A Study in Roman Politics 57–55 b.c.” Latomus 18 (1): 67–76.Google Scholar
Leach, Eleanor Winsor. 1990. “The Politics of Self-Presentation: Pliny’s ‘Letters’ and Roman Portrait Sculpture.” Classical Antiquity 9 (1): 14–39.Google Scholar
Leach, Eleanor Winsor. 1999. “Ciceronian ‘Bi-Marcus’: Correspondence with M. Terentius Varro and L. Papirius Paetus in 46 b.c.e.” Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974–2014) 129: 139–79.Google Scholar
Leach, Eleanor Winsor. 2006. “An Gravius Aliquid Scribam: Roman Seniores Write to Iuvenes.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 136 (2): 247–67.Google Scholar
Ledentu, Marie. 2004. Studium Scribendi: Recherches sur les statuts de l’écrivain et de l’écriture à Rome à la fin de la république. Bibliothèque d’études classiques 39. Louvain; Paris; Dudley, MA: Peeters Publishers.Google Scholar
Leff, Michael. 1998. “Cicero’s Pro Murena and the Strong Case for Rhetoric.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 1 (1): 61–88.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Gustav Adolf. 2004. “Der Beginn der Res Gestae des Augustus und das politische Exemplum des Cn. Pompeius Magnus.” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 148: 151–62.Google Scholar
Lenaghan, John O. 1970. A Commentary on Cicero’s Oration De Haruspicum Responso. Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leon, Harry J. 1935. “The Technique of Emotional Appeal in Cicero’s Judicial Speeches.” The Classical Weekly 29 (5): 33–7.Google Scholar
Levick, Barbara. 1986. “The Politics of the Early Principate.” In Roman Political Life 90 b.c. – a.d. 69, ed. Wiseman, T. P., reprint, 45–75. Exeter Studies in History 7. Exeter: University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 1998. “Rhétorique et philosophie: la monstruosité politique chez Cicéron.” Revue des études latines 76: 139–57.Google Scholar
Libero, Lorentana de. 1992. Obstruktion: Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der ausgehenden römischen Republik (70–49 v. Chr.). Hermes Einzelschriften 59. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Lintott, Andrew. 1999a. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lintott, Andrew. 1999b. Violence in Republican Rome. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lintott, Andrew. 2004. “Legal Procedure in Cicero’s Time.” In Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, Jonathan and Paterson, Jeremy, 61–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lintott, Andrew. 2008. Cicero as Evidence: A Historian’s Companion. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Livadiotti, Umberto. 2017. La forza del nome: identità politica e mobilitazione popolare nella Roma tardorepubblicana. Rome: Artemide.Google Scholar
Lobur, John Alexander. 2008. Consensus, Concordia and the Formation of Roman Imperial Ideology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1995. “Cicero’s Politics in De Officiis.” In Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Hellenisticum, eds. Laks, André and Schofield, Malcolm, 213–40. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2006. “Cicero’s Politics in De Officiis.” In From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, 307–34. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
López Pérez, Mercedes. 2018. “Fulvia Flacca Bambalia, la primera mujer al servicio del poder en Roma, o la creación de un personaje literario.” In Mujer y poder en la Antigua Roma, eds. Bravo, Gonzalo, Yébenes, Sabino Perea, and Palacios, Fernando Fernández, 85–101. Madrid; Salamanca: Signifer Libros.Google Scholar
Loutsch, Claude. 1984. “Ironie et liberté de parole: remarques sur l’exorde ad principem du Pro Ligario de Cicéron.” Revue des études latines 62: 98–110.Google Scholar
Lowe, Dunstan. 2018. “Loud and Proud: The Voice of the Praeco in Roman Love Elegy.” In Complex Inferiorities: The Poetics of the Weaker Voice in Latin Literature, edited by Matzner, Sebastian and Harrison, Stephen, 149–68. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowrie, Michele. 2007. “Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus.” In Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean, edited by Heyworth, S. J., 91–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowrie, Michele. 2008. “Cicero on Caesar or Exemplum and Inability in the Brutus.” In Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit/ Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond, eds. Arweiler, Alexander and Möller, Melanie, 131–54. Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luke, Trevor S., ed. 2014. “Cicero’s Epic and Civic Theologies of Departure and Return.” In Ushering in a New Republic: Theologies of Arrival at Rome in the First Century BCE, 88–112. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
MacKendrick, Paul Lachlan. 1995. The Speeches of Cicero: Context, Law, Rhetoric. ed. Bennett, Emmett Leslie. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Mackie, Nicola. 1992. “Popularis Ideology and Popular Politics at Rome in the First Century b.c.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, neue Folge 135 (1): 49–73.Google Scholar
Mahy, Trevor. 2013. “Antonius, Triumvir and Orator: Career, Style, and Effectiveness.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. van der Blom, Henriette and Steel, Catherine, 329–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Gesine. 2004. “Performance and Rhetoric in Cicero’s Philippics.” Antichthon 38 (1): 51–69.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Gesine. 2007. Cicero, Philippics 3–9. Vol. ii. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Gesine. 2008. “Cicero Versus Antonius. On the Structure and Construction of the Philippics Collection.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, Tom and Wilson, Marcus, 37: 39–61. Prudentia. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Gesine. 2011. “Ciceronian Praise as a Step to Pliny’s Panegyricus.” In Pliny’s Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World, ed. Roche, Paul, 85–103. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Gesine. 2012. “The Speeches to the People in Cicero’s Oratorical Corpora.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 30 (2): 153–75.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Gesine. 2014. Cicero. Understanding Classics. London; New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Gesine. 2018. “Senatus Me Auctore Decrevit (Cic. Phil. 6 1): On the Use and Functions of Senate Decrees in Cicero’s Political Speeches.” In Rappresentazione e uso dei senatus consulta nelle fonti letterarie della repubblica e del primo principato/Darstellung und Gebrauch der Senatus Consulta in den literarischen Quellen der Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit, eds. Balbo, Andrea, Buongiorno, Pierangelo, and Malaspina, Ermanno, 37–56. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Marchese, Rosa Rita. 2014. “Speech and Silence in Cicero’s Final Days.” The Classical Journal 110 (1): 77–98.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Sandra Citroni. 1999. “Volontà degli amici ed esercizio del potere in Cicerone.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 42: 65–94.Google Scholar
Maric, Lazar. 2014. “Sincere Humans and Insincere Beasts: Cicero’s Politics of Humanity.” Antichthon 48 (January): 77–94.Google Scholar
Marini Avonzo, F. de. 1957. La funzione giurisdizionale del senato romano. Milan: Guiffrè.Google Scholar
Marrone, Giovannella Cresci. 2005. “‘Voi chi siete popolo … ’ Popolo ed esercito nella concezione cesariana ed augustea.” In Popolo e potere nel mondo antico: atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 23–25 settembre 2004, ed. Urso, Gianpaolo, 157–72. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. 1987. “Excepta Oratio, the Other “Pro Milone” and the Question of Shorthand.” Latomus 46 (Fasc. 4): 730–6.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1985. “A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of Person; the Notion of Self.” trans. W. D. Halls. In The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History, eds. Carrithers, Michael, Collins, Steven, and Lukes, Steven, 1–25. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, James M. 1988. Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Êthos. Chapel Hill & London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
May, James M. 1995. “Patron and Client, Father and Son in Cicero’s ‘Pro Caelio.’” The Classical Journal 90 (4): 433–41.Google Scholar
May, James M. 2001. “Cicero’s Pro Milone: An Ideal Speech of an Ideal Orator.” In The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome: Essays in Honor of George A. Kennedy, ed. Wooten, Cecil W., 123–36. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Mcadams, Dan P. 2006. “The Problem of Narrative Coherence.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 19 (2): 109–25.Google Scholar
Meier, Christian. 1966. Res publica amissa: eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Meister, Jan B. 2013. “Adventus und Profectio: aristokratisches Prestige, Bindungswesen und Raumkonzepte im republikanischen und frühkaiserzeitlichen Rom.” Museum Helveticum 70 (1): 33–56.Google Scholar
Melchior, Aislinn. 2008. “Twinned Fortunes and the Publication of Cicero’s Pro Milone.” Classical Philology 103 (3): 282–97.Google Scholar
Meyer, Eduard. 1918. Caesars Monarchie und das Principat des Pompejus: innere Geschichte Roms von 66 bis 44 v. Chr. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta.Google Scholar
Meyer, Inga. 2003. “Die Datierung von Ciceros Rede de haruspicum responso.” Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 6: 97–109.Google Scholar
Meyer, Inga. 2006. Von der Vision zur Reform: der Staat der Gesetze: Ciceros Programm einer Neuordnung der römischen Republik, 56–51 v. Chr. Quellen und Forschungen zur antiken Welt; Bd. 50. München: Utz.Google Scholar
Michel, Jacques. 1962. Gratuité en droit romain. Études d’histoire et d’ethnologie juridiques. Brussels: Institut de Sociologie de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus. 1984. “The Political Character of the Classical Roman Republic, 200–151 b.c.” The Journal of Roman Studies 74: 1–19.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus. 1986. “Politics, Persuasion and the People before the Social War (150–90 b.c.).” Journal of Roman Studies 76: 1–11.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Thomas N. 1969. “Cicero before Luca (September 57–April 56 b.c.).” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 100: 295–320.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Thomas N. 1991. Cicero: The Senior Statesman. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moatti, Claudia. 1997. La raison de Rome: naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République (iie-ier siècle avant Jésus-Christ). Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Moatti, Claudia. 2018. Res publica: Histoire romaine de la chose publique. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Möller, Melanie. 2004. Talis oratio – qualis vita: zu Theorie und Praxis mimetischer Verfahren in der griechisch-römischen Literaturkritik. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, 2.Reihe, B. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor. 1996. The History of Rome. Translated by William Purdie Dickson. Reprint of 1894 edition. Vol. v. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Montague, Holly W. 1992. “Advocacy and Politics: The Paradox of Cicero’s Pro Ligario.” The American Journal of Philology 113 (4): 559–74.Google Scholar
Monteleone, Ciro. 2003. La Terza Filippica di Cicerone: retorica e regolamento del Senato, legalità e rapporti di forza. Fasano: Schena.Google Scholar
Moreau, Philippe. 2003. “Donner la parole au peuple? Rhétorique et manipulation des contiones à la fin de la République romaine.” In Argumentation et discours politique: Antiquité grecque et latine, Révolution française, monde contemporain, eds. Bonnafous, Simone, Chiron, Pierre, Ducard, Dominique, and Levy, Carlos, 175–90. Paris: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Moreau, Philippe. 2012. “Exiler Cicéron. La lex Clodia de capite ciuis (58 avant J.-C.) a-t-elle comporté une clause de serment.” In La société romaine et ses élites. Hommages à Élisabeth Deniaux, eds. Baudry, R. and Destephen, S., 35–42. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Morgan, Llewelyn. 2000. “The Autopsy of C. Asinius Pollio.” Journal of Roman Studies 90: 51–69.Google Scholar
Morrell, Kit. 2017. Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morrell, Kit. 2018a. “‘Certain Gentlemen Say … ’: Cicero, Cato, and the Debate on the Validity of Clodius’ Laws.” In Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions, eds. Gray, Christa, Andrea Balbo, Richard M. Marshall, A., and Catherine, E. W. Steel, 191–210. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morrell, Kit. 2018b. “Cato, Pompey’s Third Consulship and the Politics of Milo’s Trial.” In Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. van der Blom, Henriette, Gray, Christa, and Steel, Catherine, 165–80. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, Robert. 2004. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, Robert. 2007. “Caesar’s Alleged Fear of Prosecution and His ‘Ratio Absentis’ in the Approach to the Civil War.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, Bd. 56, H. 2: 159–78.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, Robert. 2013. “‘Cultural Hegemony’ and the Communicative Power of the Roman Elite.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. van der Blom, Henriette and Steel, Catherine, 29–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, Henrik. 2001. Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, Henrik. 2013. “From Meeting to Text: The Contio in the Late Republic.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. van der Blom, Henriette and Steel, Catherine, 63–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, Henrik. 2017. Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Münzer, Friedrich. 1920. Römische Adelsparteien und Adelsfamilien. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Nardo, Dante. 1970. Il commentariolum petitionis. La propaganda elettorale nella “Ars” di Quinto Cicerone. Padua: Liviana Scolastica.Google Scholar
Narducci, Emanuele. 1997. Cicerone e l’eloquenza romana: Retorica e progetto culturale. Quadrante 86. Roma: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
Narducci, Emanuele. 2002. Aspetti della fortuna di Cicerone nella cultura latina. Atti del 3. Symposium Ciceronianum Arpinas. Florence: Felice le Monnier.Google Scholar
Narducci, Emanuele. 2004. Cicerone e i suoi interpreti: Studi sull’ opera e la fortuna. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Nédoncelle, Maurice. 1948. “Prosopon et Persona dans l’antiquité Classique. Essai de bilan linguistique.” Revue des sciences religieuses 22 (3): 277–99.Google Scholar
Neel, Jaclyn. 2017. “Cicero’s Rhetoric of Terror.” Mouseion: Journal of the Classical Association of Canada 14 (3): 437–53.Google Scholar
Nicholson, John. 1992. Cicero’s Return from Exile: The Orations Post Reditum. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nippel, Wilfried. 1995. Public Order in Ancient Rome. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1939. M. Tulli Ciceronis De domo sua ad pontifices oratio. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1996. “Aristotle on Emotions and Rational Persuasion.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, ed. Rorty, Amélie, 303–23. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nybakken, Oscar E. 1939. “Humanitas Romana.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 70: 396–413.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, Ellen. 2019. “‘The Noise, and the People’: Popular Clamor and Political Discourse in Latin Historiography.” In Complex Inferiorities: The Poetics of the Weaker Voice in Latin Literature, edited by Matzner, Sebastian and Harrison, Stephen, 129–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oliensis, Ellen. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Opelt, Ilona. 1965. Die Lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen: eine Typologie. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Osgood, Josiah. 2006. “Eloquence under the Triumvirs.” American Journal of Philology 127 (4): 525–51.Google Scholar
Osgood, Josiah. 2009. “The Pen and the Sword: Writing and Conquest in Caesar’s Gaul.” Classical Antiquity 28 (2): 328–58.Google Scholar
Östenberg, Ida. 2019. “Dulce et Decorum. Dying for the Fatherland (or Not) in Ancient Rome.” Lecture presented at the FIEC/CA 2019, University College London, July 8.Google Scholar
Paananen, Unto. 1972. Sallust’s Politico-Social Terminology: Its Use and Biographical Significance. Annales Acad. Scient. Fennicae, Series B 175. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, Sophia, Serafim, Andreas, and da Vela, Beatrice, eds. 2017. The Theatre of Justice: Aspects of Performance in Greco-Roman Oratory. Mnemosyne Supplement 403. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Parks, E. Patrick. 1945. The Roman Rhetorical Schools as a Preparation for the Courts under the Early Empire. The Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science lxiii 2. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Paulhus, Delroy L., and Trapnell, Paul D.. 2008. “Self-Presentation of Personality: An Agency-Communion Framework.” In Handbook of Personality Psychology, 19: 492–517.Google Scholar
Peer, Ayelet. 2008. “Cicero’s Last Caesarian Speech: The Pro Rege Deiotaro as a Final Warning before the Ides of March.” In Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XIV, ed. Deroux, Carl, 189–208. Latomus, Collection 315. Brussels: Éditions Latomus.Google Scholar
Peer, Ayelet. 2015. Julius Caesar’s Bellum Civile and the Composition of a New Reality. Farnham; Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Pernot, Laurent. 1993. La rhétorique de l’éloge dans le monde gréco-romain. Collection des études Augustiniennes. Série Antiquité. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Pernot, Laurent. 2015. Epideictic Rhetoric: Questioning the Stakes of Ancient Praise. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Petrone, G. 1978. “La parola e l’interdetto. Note alla “pro Rege Deiotaro” e alle orazioni cesariane.” Pan 6: 85–104.Google Scholar
Pieper, Christoph. 2014. “Memoria Saeptus: Cicero and the Mastery of Memory in His (Post-) Consular Speeches.” Symbolae Osloenses 88 (1): 42–69.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, Francisco. 1989. Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma. Monografías de historia antigua. Zaragoza: Departamento de Ciencias de la Antiguedad, Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, Francisco 1994. “Ideología y práctica política en la Roma tardorrepublicana.” Gerión 12: 69–94.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, Francisco 1997. Contra arma verbis: El orador ante el pueblo en la Roma tardorrepublicana. Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, Francisco 2004. “Die nützliche Erinnerung: Geschichtsschreibung, ‘Mos Maiorum’ und die römische Identität.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 53 (2): 147–72.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, Francisco 2006. “The Tyrant Must Die: Preventative Tyrannicide in Roman Political Thought.” In Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, eds. Simón, Francisco Marco, Rodríguez, José Remesal, and Polo, Francisco Pina, 71–101. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat Barcelona.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, Francisco 2011. “Public Speaking in Rome: A Question of Auctoritas.” In The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, ed. Peachin, Michael. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, Francisco 2018. “Political Alliances and Rivalries in Contiones in the Late Roman Republic.” In Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. van der Blom, Henriette, Gray, Christa, and Steel, Catherine, 107–27. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pitcher, Roger A. 2008. “The Second Philippic as a Source for Aristocratic Values.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, Tom and Wilson, Marcus: 131–9. Prudentia. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 2007. “Invective and the Orator: Ciceronian Theory and Practice.” In Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, ed. Booth, Joan, 1–25. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Prost, François. 2003. “Un cas de constitution d’un genre: les discours de retour d’exil de Cicéron à la lumière du De oratore.” In Argumentation et discours politique: Antiquité grecque et latine, Révolution française, monde contemporain, eds. Bonnafous, Simone, Chiron, Pierre, Ducard, Dominique, and Levy, Carlos, 29–38. Paris: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, Kurt A. 2010a. “Creating a Grand Coalition of True Roman Citizens: On Caesar’s Political Strategy in the Civil War.” In Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars, eds. Breed, Brian W., Damon, Cynthia, and Rossi, Andreola, 159–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, Kurt A. 2010b. “Poker um Macht und Freiheit: Caesars Bürgerkrieg als Wendepunkt im Übergang von der Republik zur Monarchie.” In Zwischen Monarchie und Republik: gesellschaftliche Stabilisierungsleistungen und politische Transformationspotentiale in den antiken Stadtstaaten, eds. Linke, Bernhard, Meier, Mischa, and Strothmann, Meret, 163–86. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, Kurt A., and Toher, Mark, eds. 1990. Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rabe, Anne Meredith. 2015. “Innovation and Invective in Cicero’s Violent Metaphors.” Diss. Providence: Brown University.Google Scholar
Ramage, Edwin S. 1963. “Urbanitas: Cicero and Quintilian, a Contrast in Attitudes.” The American Journal of Philology 84 (4): 390–414.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. 1984. “Le Pro Marcello et l’insinuation politique.” Caesarodunum 19: 43–56.Google Scholar
Ramsey, John T. 2003. Cicero: Philippics I–II. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, John T. 2010. “Debate at a Distance: A Unique Rhetorical Strategy in Cicero’s Thirteenth Philippic.” In Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, Andrew, 155–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, John T. 2016. “How and Why Was Pompey Made Sole Consul in 52 BC?” Historia 65 (3): 298–324.Google Scholar
Rawson, Beryl. 1978. The Politics of Friendship: Pompey and Cicero. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Rees, R. D. 2011. “The Whole Truth? Laudationes in the Courtroom.” In Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, Christopher and Covino, Ralph, 83–98. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Remer, Gary. 2017. Ethics and the Orator: The Ciceronian Tradition of Political Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Nedra. 1993. “Êthos as Location: New Sites for Understanding Discursive Authority.” Rhetoric Review 11 (2): 325–38.Google Scholar
Richardson, John S. 1971. “The Commentariolum Petitionis.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, no. H. 4: 436–42.Google Scholar
Richlin, Amy. 2002. “Cicero’s Head.” In Constructions of the Classical Body, ed. Porter, James I., 190–211. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, Amy. 2011. “Old Boys: Teacher-Student Bonding in Roman Oratory.” The Classical World 105 (1): 91–107.Google Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew M. 1995. “Appropriation and Reversal as a Basis for Oratorical Proof.” Classical Philology 90 (3): 245–56.Google Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew M. 1997. “Did the Romans Believe in Their Verdicts?” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 15 (3): 235–51.Google Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew M. 1998. “Self and Community in the Younger Pliny.” Arethusa 31 (1): 75–97.Google Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew M. 2002. “The Post Reditum Speeches.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, James M., 159–96. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew M. 2017. “Cicero, Documents and the Implications for History.” In Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome, eds. Sandberg, Kaj and Smith, Christopher, 257–78. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Robb, M. A. 2010. Beyond Populares and Optimates: Political Language in the Late Republic. Historia Einzelschriften 213. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew. 1997. “Color-Blindness: Cicero’s Death, Declamation, and the Production of History.” Classical Philology 92 (2): 109–30.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew. 2004. “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia.” Classical Philology 99 (1): 1–56.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew. 2009. “The Exemplary Past in Roman Historiography and Culture.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians, ed. Feldherr, Andrew, 214–30. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew. 2010. “Demolished Houses, Monumentality, and Memory in Roman Culture.” Classical Antiquity 29 (1): 117–80.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew. 2018. Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ronald, Kate. 1990. “A Reexamination of Personal and Public Discourse in Classical Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review 9 (1): 36–48.Google Scholar
Rose, Peter. 1995. “Cicero and the Rhetoric of Imperialism: Putting the Politics Back into Political Rhetoric.” Rhetorica 13 (4): 359–99.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, Cristina. 2010. “Praising Caesar: Towards the Construction of an Autocratic Ruler’s Image Between the Roman Republic and the Empire.” In Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, Christopher and Covino, Ralph, 181–98. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, Cristina. 2017a. Public Opinion and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, Cristina. 2017b. “Informal Conversations between Senators in the Late Roman Republic.” In Political Communication in the Roman World, ed. Rosillo-López, Cristina, 17–33. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, Cristina.ed. 2017c. Political Communication in the Roman World. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, Cristina. 2018. “Political Participation and the Identification of Politicians in the Late Roman Republic.” In Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. van der Blom, Henriette, Gray, Christa, and Steel, Catherine, 69–87. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubio, Lisardo. 1954. M. Tulio Cicerón: Defensa de L. C. Balbo. Filologia Clasica, xiv. Barcelona: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar
Ruch, Michel. 1965. Cicéron pour Marcellus. Érasme: collection de textes latins commentés. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rudich, Vasily. 1985. “Accommodation to a Corrupt Reality: Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus.” The Ancient World 11: 95–100.Google Scholar
Rudich, Vasily. 1993. Political Dissidence under Nero: The Price of Dissimulation. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rudich, Vasily. 2006. “Navigating the Uncertain: Literature and Censorship in the Early Roman Empire.” Arion, Third Series 14: 7–28.Google Scholar
Rundell, W. M. F. 1979. “Cicero and Clodius: The Question of Credibility.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 28 (3): 301–28.Google Scholar
Russell, Amy. 2013. “Speech, Competition, and Collaboration: Tribunician Politics and the Development of Popular Ideology.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. van der Blom, Henriette and Steel, Catherine, 101–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutledge, Steven H. 1999. “Delatores and the Tradition of Violence in Roman Oratory.” American Journal of Philology 120 (4): 555–73.Google Scholar
Rutledge, Steven H. 2001. Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rutledge, Steven H. 2010. “Oratory and Politics in the Empire.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon, 109–21. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Ryan, Francis X. 1998. Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Saller, Richard. 1989. “Patronage and Friendship in Early Imperial Rome: Drawing the Distinction.” In Patronage in Ancient Society, 49–62. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Samponaro, Laura M. 2007. “Style and Character in Ciceronian Oratory.” Diss. Columbia University.Google Scholar
Sansen, Raymond. 1975. “Doctrine de l’amitié chez Cicéron: exposé, source, critique, influence.” Thèse Paris IV, 1972, Lille: Université de Lille.Google Scholar
Santangelo, Federico. 2006. “Sulla and the Senate: A Reconsideration.” Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 17: 7–22.Google Scholar
Sattler, Peter. 1960. Augustus und der Senat. Untersuchungen zur römischen Innenpolitik zwischen 30 und 17 v. Christus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Sauer, Vera. 2013. Religiöses in der politischen Argumentation der späten römischen Republik: Ciceros Erste Catilinarische Rede – eine Fallstudie. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Scatolin, Adriano. 2018. “Cicero’s Praise of Caesar in the Pro Marcello – a Reassessment of a Rhetorical Strategy.” In Papers on Rhetoric 16, eds. Montefusco, Lucia Calboli and Celentano, Maria Silvana, 135–50. Perugia: Editrice Pliniana.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peter L. 1978. “Cicero’s Place in Roman Philosophy: A Study of His Prefaces.” Classical Journal 74 (2): 115–27.Google Scholar
Schmitthenner, Walter. 1960. “Politik und Armee in der späten römischen Republik.” Historische Zeitschrift 190 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. 1995. “Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica.” In Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, ed. Powell, J. G. F., 63–83. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, Johannes. 2009. Das Verhältnis zwischen Augustus und dem Senat zwischen 24 v. Chr. und 13 n. Chr.: Kaiser Augustus und der Senat bzw. der Hochadel. München: GRIN Verlag.Google Scholar
Schwindt, Jürgen Paul. 2000. Prolegomena zu einer “Phänomenologie” der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: von den Anfängen bis Quintilian. Hypomnemata: Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben 130. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Seager, Robin. 1972. “Cicero and the Word Popularis.” The Classical Quarterly, New Series 22 (2): 328–38.Google Scholar
Seager, Robin. 2014. “The (Re/De)Construction of Clodius in Cicero’s Speeches.” The Classical Quarterly 64: 226–40.Google Scholar
Settle, James N. 1963. “The Trial of Milo and the Other Pro Milone.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 94: 268–80.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1980. Cicero: Select Letters. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 2004. Cicero: Letters to Atticus: Volume 3, Books 5–7.9. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. 1956. “Violence in Roman Politics.” The Journal of Roman Studies 46: 1–9.Google Scholar
Sluiter, Ineke, and Rosen, Ralph. 2004. “General Introduction.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, eds. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph, 1–20. Penn-Leiden Colloquium on Ancient Values (2nd: 2002, University of Pennsylvania). Mnemosyne Supplementum 2. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E. 1966. Cicero the Statesman. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 2014. Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sordi, Marta, ed. 1996. Processi e politica nel mondo antico. Contributi dell’Istituto di storia antico 22. Milano: Pubblicazioni dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cruore.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2001. Cicero, Rhetoric, and Empire. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2002. “Cicero’s Brutus: The End of Oratory and the Beginning of History?” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 46: 195–211.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2007. “Name and Shame? Invective against Clodius and Others in the Post-Exile Speeches.” In Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, ed. Booth, Joan, 105–27. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2008. “Finessing Failure: The Sixth Philippic.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric, Ideology, eds. Wilson, Marcus and Stevenson, Tom, 255–65. Prudentia 37. Auckland, NZ: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2010. “Tribunician Sacrosanctity and Oratorical Performance in the Late Republic.” In Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, Andrew, 37–50. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2011. “Cicero’s Oratory of Praise and Blame and the Practice of Elections in the Late Roman Republic.” In Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, Christopher and Covino, Ralph, 35–48. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2013. The End of the Roman Republic 146 to 44 bc: Conquest and Crisis. The Edinburgh History of Ancient Rome. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2014a. “Rethinking Sulla: The Case of the Roman Senate.” The Classical Quarterly 64 (2): 657–68.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2014b. “The Roman Senate and the Post-Sullan Res Publica.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 63 (3): 323–39.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2015. “Introduction: The Legacy of the Republican Roman Senate.” Classical Receptions Journal 7 (January): 1–10.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2016. “Early Career Prosecutors: Forensic Activity and Senatorial Careers in the Late Republic.” In Cicero’s Law: Rethinking Roman Law of the Late Republic, ed. Du Plessis, Paul J., 205–27. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W. 2017. “Re Publica Nihil Desperatius: Salvaging the State in Cicero’s Pre-Civil War Philosophical Works.” In Philosophie in Rom – römische Philosophie? Kultur-, literatur- und philosophiegeschichtliche Perspektiven, eds. Müller, Gernot Michael and Zini, Fosca Mariani, 269–82. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 358. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine, and van der Blom, Henriette, eds. 2013. Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine E. W., Gray, Christa, and van der Blom, Henriette. 2018. “Introduction.” In Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. van der Blom, Henriette, Gray, Christa, and Steel, Catherine, 1–12. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stem, Rex. 2005. “The First Eloquent Stoic: Cicero on Cato the Younger.” The Classical Journal 101 (1), 37–49.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Tom. 2008. “Tyrants, Kings, and Fathers in the Philippics.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, Tom and Wilson, Marcus, 95–113. Prudentia 37. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Tom. 2009. “Antony as ‘Tyrant’ in Cicero’s First Philippic.” Ramus 38 (2): 174–86.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Tom, and Wilson, Marcus. 2008. “Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, 1–21. Prudentia 37. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Stockton, David L. 1971. Cicero: A Political Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. M. 2005. “Optimates: An Archaeology.” In Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, eds. Welch, Kathryn E. and Hillard, T. W., 59–94. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Stroh, Wilfried. 1982. “Die Nachahmung des Demosthenes in Ciceros Philippiken.” In Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, 1–31. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 28. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Stroh, Wilfried. 2004. “De Domo Sua: Legal Problem and Structure.” In Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, Jonathan and Paterson, Jeremy, 313–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strunk, Thomas E. 2010. “Offending the Powerful: Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus and Safe Criticism.” Mnemosyne, Fourth Series 63 (2): 241–67.Google Scholar
Sumi, Geoffrey S. 1997. “Power and Ritual: The Crowd at Clodius’ Funeral.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 46 (1): 80–102.Google Scholar
Sussman, Lewis A. 1994. “Antony as a Miles Gloriosus in Cicero’s Second Philippic.” Scholia 3: 53–83.Google Scholar
Syme, Ronald. 1938. “Caesar, the Senate and Italy.” Papers of the British School at Rome 14: 1–31.Google Scholar
Syme, Ronald. 1964. Sallust. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Talbert, Richard J. A. 1984b. The Senate of Imperial Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, James. 2008. “Contiones in the Age of Cicero.” Classical Antiquity 27 (1): 163–201.Google Scholar
Tansey, Patrick. 2000. “The Princeps Senatus in the Last Decades of the Republic.” Chiron 30: 15–30.Google Scholar
Taplin, Oliver. 1972. “Aeschylean Silences and Silences in Aeschylus.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 76: 57–97.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. Jeffrey. 1999. The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. Jeffrey. 2011. “Invective Identities in Pro Caelio.” In Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, Christopher and Covino, Ralph, 165–80. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. Jeffrey. 2013. “Campaign Rhetoric.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, edited by van der Blom, Henriette and Steel, Catherine, 133–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. Jeffrey. 2017. “Intermediaries in Political Communication: Adlegatio and Its Uses.” In Political Communication in the Roman World, ed. Rosillo-López, Cristina, 55–80. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Taylor, Lily Ross. 1942. “Caesar and the Roman Nobility.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 73: 1–24.Google Scholar
Taylor, Lily Ross. 1949a. Party Politics in the Age of Caesar. Sather Classical Lectures 22. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Lily Ross. 1949b. “On the Chronology of Cicero’s Letters of 56–55 b.c.” Classical Philology 44 (4): 217–21.Google Scholar
Taylor, Lily Ross. 1962. “Forerunners of the Gracchi.” The Journal of Roman Studies 52: 19–27.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, Antonella. 2005. Lezione di buon governo per un dittatore: Cicerone, Pro Marcello: saggio di commento. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Tempest, Kathryn. 2011. Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tempest, Kathryn. 2013. “An Êthos of Sincerity: Echoes of the De Republica in Cicero’s Pro Marcello.” Greece & Rome 60: 262–80.Google Scholar
Thommen, Lukas. 1989. Das Volkstribunat der späten römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 59. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Thommen, Lukas. 2008. “Populus, Plebs und Populares in der römischen Republik.” In Populismus in Geschichte und Gegenwart, eds. Faber, Richard and Unger, Frank, 31–42. Würz: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Tiersch, Claudia. 2009. “Politische Öffentlichkeit statt Mitbestimmung? Zur Bedeutung der Contiones in der mittleren und späten römischen Republik.” Klio 91 (1): 40–68.Google Scholar
Tiersch, Claudia. 2018. “Political Communication in the Late Roman Republic: Semantic Battles between Optimates and Populares?” In Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. der Blom, Henriette van, Gray, Christa, and Steel, Catherine, 35–68. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, Catherine. 2008. “The People’s Consul: The Significance of Cicero’s Use of the Term ‘Popularis.’” Illinois Classical Studies 33–34: 181–99.Google Scholar
Trejo, Malena. 2017. “Formas del Stuprum en el discurso De Haruspicum Responso de Cicerón.” Circe de Clásicos y Modernos 21 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph H. 1975. “Role Taking: Process vs. Conformity.” In Life As Theater: A Dramaturgical Sourcebook, eds. Brissett, Dennis and Edgley, Charles, 85–100. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Tzounakas, Spyridon. 2009. “The Peroration of Cicero’s Pro Milone.” Classical World 102 (2): 129–41.Google Scholar
Usher, Stephen. 2008. Cicero’s Speeches: The Critic in Action. Oxford: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Usher, Stephen. 2010. “Cicero’s First Philippic and the Fall of the Republic.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 53 (1): 129–36.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Christopher S. 2014. The World of Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus: Aesthetics and Empire in Ancient Rome. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Christopher S. (forthcoming). Empire of Eloquence: Roman Rhetoric from the Death of Cicero to Late Antiquity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Vanderbroeck, Paul J. J. 1987. Popular Leadership and Collective Behavior in the Late Roman Republic (ca. 80–50 b.c.). Dutch Monographs on Ancient History and Archaeology, III. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Vasaly, Ann. 1993. Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vasaly, Ann. 2015. Livy’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verboven, Koenraad. 2002. The Economy of Friends: Economic Aspects of Amicitia and Patronage in the Late Republic. Brussels: Editions Latomus.Google Scholar
Vervaet, Frederk Juliaan. 2010. “Arrogating Despotic Power through Deceit: The Pompeian Model for Augustan Dissimulatio.” In Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Despotism and Deceit in the Graeco-Roman World, eds. Turner, Andrew J., Kim, James H. Chong-Gossard, On, and Vervaet, Frederik Juliaan, 11: 133–66. Leiden; Boston; Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Vielberg, Meinolf. 2017. “Alte Freunde im Gespräch: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der Amicitia bei Cicero.” Ciceroniana 1 (2).Google Scholar
van der Wal, Rogier L. 2007. “‘What a Funny Consul We Have!’ Cicero’s Dealings with Cato Uticensis and Prominent Friends in Opposition.” In Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, ed. Booth, Joan, 183–206. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Walser, Gerold. 1959. “Der Prozess gegen Q. Ligarius im Jahre 46 v. Chr.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 8 (1): 90–6.Google Scholar
Walters, Jonathan. 1998. “Making a Spectacle: Deviant Men, Invective, and Pleasure.” Arethusa 31 (3): 355–67.Google Scholar
Ward, Allen Mason. 1977. Marcus Crassus and the Late Roman Republic. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Neville H. 1935. Cicero Orations: Pro Archia Poeta – Post Reditum in Senatu – Post Reditum Ad Quirites – De Domo Sua – De Haruspicum Responsis – Pro Plancio. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Kathryn. 2012. Magnus Pius: Sextus Pompeius and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Welch, Kathryn E. 1995a. “Antony, Fulvia, and the Ghost of Clodius in 47 b.c.” Greece & Rome 42 (2): 182–201.Google Scholar
Welch, Kathryn E. 1995b. “The Career of M. Aemilius Lepidus 49–44 b.c.” Hermes 123 (4): 443–54.Google Scholar
Welch, Kathryn E. 2008. “Nimium Felix: Caesar’s Felicitas and Cicero’s Philippics.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, Tom and Wilson, Marcus, 181–213. Prudentia 37. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Welch, Kathryn, and Powell, Anton. 1998. Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
White, Hayden V. 1973. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, Peter. 2003. “Tactics in Caesar’s Correspondence with Cicero.” In Caesar against Liberty? Perspectives on His Autocracy, eds. Cairns, Francis and Fantham, Elaine. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 11 (ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 43). Cambridge: Cairns.Google Scholar
Williams, Richard S. 1978. “The Role of Amicitia in the Career of A. Gabinius (Cos. 58).” Phoenix 32 (3): 195–210.Google Scholar
Wilson, Marcus. 2008. “Your Writings or Your Life: Cicero’s Philippics and Declamation.” In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric, Ideology, eds. Wilson, Marcus and Stevenson, Tom, 305–34. Auckland, nz: Polygraphia Ltd.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, Michael. 1981. “Cicero and the Silver Age.” In Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, ed. Ludwig, Walther, 237–74. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 28. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, Michael. 2002. “Believing the Pro Marcello.” In Vertis in Usum: Studies in Honor of Edward Courtney, eds. Miller, J. F., Damon, C., and Myers, K. S.. München-Leipzig: Saur.Google Scholar
Winterling, Aloys. 2009. Politics and Society in Imperial Rome. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, Ch. 1950. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, Ch. 1961. “Avdaces: A Study in Political Phraseology.” The Journal of Roman Studies 51: 12–22.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1966. “The Ambitions of Quintus Cicero.” The Journal of Roman Studies 56: 108–15.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1971. New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 b.c.–14 a.d. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2008. Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wisse, Jakob. 1989. Êthos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Wolf, Friedrich August. 1801. M. Tulli Ciceronis quae vulgo feruntur Orationes quattuor. i. Post Reditum in Senatu. ii. Ad Quirites post Reditum. iii. Pro Domo sua ad Pontifices. iv. De Haruspicum responsis. Berlin: F. T. Lagardii.Google Scholar
Wooten, Cecil W. 1983. Cicero’s Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model: The Rhetoric of Crisis. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wray, David. 2001. Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, F. Warren. 1931. Cicero and the Theater. Smith College Classical Studies. Menasha, wi: The Collegiate Press.Google Scholar
Yakobson, Alexander. 2006. “Popular Power in the Roman Republic.” In A Companion to the Roman Republic, eds. Rosenstein, Nathan S. and Morstein-Marx, Robert, 383–400. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yakobson, Alexander. 2010. “Traditional Political Culture and the People’s Role in the Roman Republic.” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 59 (3): 282–302.Google Scholar
Yakobson, Alexander. 2018. “Aristocratic Dignity and Indignity in Republican Public Life.” In Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. van der Blom, Henriette, Gray, Christa, and Steel, Catherine, 15–34. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, Alexei V. 2007. “Cato’s Suicide in Plutarch.” The Classical Quarterly 57 (1): 216–30.Google Scholar
Zarecki, Jonathan. 2014. Cicero’s Ideal Statesman in Theory and Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Zecchini, Giuseppe. 1980. “La morte di Catone e l’opposizione intellettuale a Cesare e ad Augusto.” Athenaeum 58: 39.Google Scholar
Zecchini, Giuseppe. 2009. “I partiti politici nella crisi della repubblica.” In Partiti e fazioni nell’esperienza politica romana, ed. Zecchini, Giuseppe, 105–20. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Zerba, Michelle. 2002. “Love, Envy, and Pantomimic Morality in Cicero’s De Oratore.” Classical Philology 97 (4): 299–321.Google Scholar