Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:25:23.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Policy Responses to New Ocean Threats

Arctic Warming, Maritime Industries, and International Environmental Regulation

from Part IV - Changing Polar Seas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

By
Benjamin Hofmann
Edited by
Paul G. Harris
Paul G. Harris
Affiliation:
Education University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Change and Ocean Governance
Politics and Policy for Threatened Seas
 , pp. 215 - 235
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A., and Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–19.Google Scholar
AMAP. (2010). Assessment 2007: Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic – Effects and Potential Effects, vol. II, Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP).Google Scholar
Andresen, S., Rosendal, K., and Skjærseth, J. B. (2013). Why negotiate a legally binding mercury convention? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(4), 425–40.Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2009a). Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment 2009 Report, Arctic Council Working Group on the Protection of the Marine Environment (PAME).Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2009b). Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines 2009, Arctic Council Working Group on the Protection of the Marine Environment (PAME).Google Scholar
Bambulyak, A., Golubeva, S., Sydnes, M., et al. (2015). Resource management regimes in the Barents Sea. In Bourmistrov, A., Mellemvik, F., Bambulyak, A., et al., eds., International Arctic Petroleum Cooperation: Barents Sea Scenarios. London: Routledge, pp. 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, T., Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V., and Spilker, G. (2013). Is there a “Depth versus Participation” dilemma in international cooperation? The Review of International Organizations, 8(4), 477–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerson, S. G. (2008). Arctic meltdown: The economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Affairs, 87(2), 63–77.Google Scholar
Böhmelt, T., and Pilster, U. H. (2010). International environmental regimes: Legalisation, flexibility and effectiveness. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 245–60.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., and Drahos, P. (2000). Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitmeier, H., Levy, M. A., Young, O. R., and Zürn, M. (1996). International Regimes Database (IRD) Data Protocol. Available at www.fernuni-hagen.de/polis/download/lg2/projekte/protocoll_regime_database.pdf (last accessed December 12 2016).Google Scholar
Breitmeier, H., Young, O. R., and Zürn, M. (2006). International Regimes Database. Available at www.fernuni-hagen.de/polis/lg2/projekte/InternationalRegimesDatabase.shtml (last accessed August 6, 2017).Google Scholar
DeSombre, E. R. (2006). Flagging Standards: Globalization and Environmental, Safety, and Labor Regulations at Sea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DNV. (2014). Specially Designated Marine Areas in the Arctic High Seas, report no. 2013–1442, revision 2, Oslo: Det Norske Veritas.Google Scholar
Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., and Barsoom, P. N. (1996). Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50(3), 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkner, R. (2008). Business Power and Conflict in International Environmental Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, R. (2017). Sea Ice Extent Sinks to Record Lows at Both Poles. Available at www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/sea-ice-extent-sinks-to-record-lows-at-both-poles.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. (2006). Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A. T. (2010). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harsem, Ø., Eide, A., and Heen, K. (2011). Factors influencing future oil and gas prospects in the Arctic. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8037–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humrich, C. (2013). Fragmented international governance of Arctic offshore oil: Governance challenges and institutional improvement. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 79–99.Google Scholar
IFC. (2015). Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Offshore Oil and Gas Development, International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group.Google Scholar
IMO. (2015). International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters, International Maritime Organization, Marine Environmental Protection Committee, MEPC 68/21/Add.1, Annex10.Google Scholar
Jensen, Ø. (2016). The international code for ships operating in polar waters: Finalization, adoption and law of the sea implications. Arctic Review, 7(1), 60–82.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T. (2018). Framing the problem in Arctic offshore hydrocarbon exploitation. In Pelaudeix, C. and Basse, E. M., eds., Governance of Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas. London: Routledge, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T., and Molenaar, E. J. (2009). International Governance and Regulation of the Marine Arctic, Oslo: WWF International Arctic Programme.Google Scholar
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., and Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–99.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, J. (2010). Who Greens the Waves? Changing Authority in the Environmental Governance of Shipping and Offshore Oil and Gas Production. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lyons, Y. (2015). Regulation of offshore hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation under international law. In Warner, R. and Kaye, S., eds., Routledge Handbook of Maritime Regulation and Enforcement. London: Routledge, pp. 193–211.Google Scholar
McDorman, T. L. (2014). Canada, the United States and international law of the sea in the Arctic Ocean. In Stephens, T. and VanderZwaag, D. L., eds., Polar Oceans Governance in an Era of Environmental Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 253–68.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. (1994). Regime design matters: Intentional oil pollution and treaty compliance. International Organization, 48(3), 425–58.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. (2017). International Environmental Agreements Database Project, version 2017.1. Available at http://iea.uoregon.edu/ (last accessed August 6, 2017).Google Scholar
Hansen, C. Ø., Grønsedt, P., Graversen, C. L., and Hendriksen, C. (2016). Arctic Shipping – Commercial Opportunities and Challenges. Frederiksberg: CBS Maritime.Google Scholar
OSPAR. (2010). Quality Status Report 2010. London: OSPAR Commission.Google Scholar
OSPAR. (2016). Impacts of Certain Pressures of the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry on the Marine Environment – Stocktaking Report. London: OSPAR Commission.Google Scholar
OSPAR. (2017). Trends in discharges, spills and emissions from offshore oil and gas installations. OSPAR Intermediate Assessment 2017. Available at https://oap.ospar.org/en/ospar-assessments/intermediate-assessment-2017/ (last accessed September 15, 2017).Google Scholar
PAME (2017). Regional Waste Management Strategies for Arctic Shipping: Regional Reception Facilities Plan (RRFP) and Proposal for IMO Consideration. Akureyri: Arctic Council Working Group on the Protection of the Marine Environment (PAME).Google Scholar
Raustiala, K. (2005). Form and substance in international agreements. The American Journal of International Law, 99(3), 581–614.Google Scholar
Rayfuse, R. (2014). Coastal state jurisdiction and the Polar Code: A test case for Arctic Ocean governance? In Stephens, T. and VanderZwaag, D. L., eds., Polar Oceans Governance in an Era of Environmental Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 235–52.Google Scholar
Reiss, A. J. (1984). Consequences of compliance and deterrence models of law enforcement for the exercise of police discretion. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47(4), 83–122.Google Scholar
Skjærseth, J. B., Stokke, O. S., and Wettestad, J. (2006). Soft law, hard law, and effective implementation of international environmental norms. Global Environmental Politics, 6(3), 104–20.Google Scholar
Soltvedt, I. F. (2017). Soft law, solid implementation? The influence of precision, monitoring and stakeholder involvement on Norwegian implementation of Arctic Council recommendations. Arctic Review, 8, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2013). Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(1), 65–85.Google Scholar
Tan, A. K. (2005). Vessel-Source Marine Pollution: The Law and Politics of International Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
US EPA. (2011). Oily Bilgewater Separators, Report EPA 800-R-11-007. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2009). Whither the Arctic? Conflict or cooperation in the circumpolar north. Polar Record, 45(1), 73–82.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2011). If an Arctic Ocean treaty is not the solution, what is the alternative? Polar Record, 47(4): 327–34.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×