Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T08:03:59.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Unanticipated Anterior Larynx

from Section 4 - The Unanticipated Difficult Airway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2017

D. John Doyle
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi
Basem Abdelmalak
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Airway Management
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
, pp. 129 - 134
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nichol, HC, Zuck, D. Difficult laryngoscopy – the “anterior” larynx and the atlanto-occipital gap. Br J Anaesth. 1983 Feb;55(2):141–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benumof, JL, Cooper, SD. Quantitative improvement in laryngoscopic view by optimal external laryngeal manipulation. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Mar;8(2):136–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, JA, Levsky, ME, Givens, ML, Miller, MA. Eschmann introducer through laryngeal mask airway: a cadaveric trial of an alternate means of rescue intubation. West J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;11(1):1619.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, K, Davies, R, Evans, A, Latto, IP, Hall, JE. A comparison of the use of Trachlight and Eschmann multiple-use introducer in simulated difficult intubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jan;24(1):7681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heegaard, WG, Black, C, Pasquerella, C, Miner, J. Use of the endotracheal tube introducer as an adjunct for oral tracheal intubation in the prehospital setting. Air Med J. 2003 Jan-Feb;22(1):2831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahin, M, Anglade, D, Buchberger, M, Jankowski, A, Albaladejo, P, Ferretti, GR. Case reports: iatrogenic bronchial rupture following the use of endotracheal tube introducers. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Oct;59(10):963–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eschertzhuber, S, Brimacombe, J, Hohlrieder, M, Stadlbauer, KH, Keller, C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1253–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, DW, Picton, P, Morris, M, Turner, C. Comparison of the GlideScope, CMAC, Storz DCI with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated difficult laryngoscopy: a manikin study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Jun 21;12(1):11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, LH, Rovsing, L, Olsen, KS. GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Oct;55(9):1090–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griesdale, DE, Liu, D, McKinney, J, Choi, PT. Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):4152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, HJ, Kim, JT, Kim, HS, Kim, CS. A comparison of GlideScope videolaryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Nov;21(11):1165–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Jeon, WJ, Kim, KH, Yeom, JH, Bang, MR, Hong, JB, Cho, SY. A comparison of the Glidescope® to the McGrath® videolaryngoscope in patients. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Jul;61(1):1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J, Chase, C. The GlideScope in current clinical practice. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Aug;23(5):427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corso, RM, Piraccini, E, Agnoletti, V, Gambale, G. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: some clarification needed. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Oct;29(10):495–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viernes, D, Goldman, AJ, Galgon, RE, Joffe, AM. Evaluation of the GlideScope direct: a new video laryngoscope for teaching direct laryngoscopy. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:820961.Google ScholarPubMed
Aziz, MF, Kim, D, Mako, J, Hand, K, Brambrink, AM. A retrospective study of the performance of video laryngoscopy in an obstetric unit. Anesth Analg. 2012 Oct;115(4):904–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noppens, RR, Geimer, S, Eisel, N, David, M, Piepho, T. Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU. Crit Care. 2012 Jun 13;16(3):R103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, DT, Yang, JJ, Mak, HY, Jagannathan, N. Use of intubation introducers through a supraglottic airway to facilitate tracheal intubation: a brief review. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jul;59(7):704–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, QJ, Han, XP, Mak, HY, Wong, DT. Tracheal intubation in an unanticipated difficult airway by advancing a bronchoscope and a tracheal tube introducer through a LMA Supreme™. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Feb;59(2):234–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zundert, TC, Wong, DT, van Zundert, AA. The LMA-Supreme™ as an intubation conduit in patients with known difficult airways: a prospective evaluation study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Jan;57(1):7781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halwagi, AE, Massicotte, N, Lallo, A, Gauthier, A, Boudreault, D, Ruel, M, Girard, F. Tracheal intubation through the I-gel™ supraglottic airway versus the LMA Fastrach™: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):152–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michalek, P, Donaldson, W, Graham, C, Hinds, JD. A comparison of the I-gel supraglottic airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask airway: a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2010 Jan;81(1):74–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Theiler, L, Kleine-Brueggeney, M, Urwyler, N, Graf, T, Luyet, C, Greif, R. Randomized clinical trial of the i-gel™ and Magill tracheal tube or single-use ILMA™ and ILMA™ tracheal tube for blind intubation in anaesthetized patients with a predicted difficult airway. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Aug;107(2):243–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, R, Chandralekha, Ray BR. Evaluation of air-Q™ intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in infants – a pilot study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):156–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jagannathan, N, Sohn, LE, Sawardekar, A, Gordon, J, Shah, RD, Mukherji, II, Roth, AG, Suresh, S. A randomized trial comparing the Ambu® Aura-i™ with the air-Q™ intubating laryngeal airway as conduits for tracheal intubation in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Dec;22(12):1197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howath, A, Brimacombe, J, Keller, C. Gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Oct;30(5):624–7. Erratum in: Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Dec;30(6):818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, AB, Nathanson, MH, Gajraj, NM. Tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask airway using a gum elastic bougie: the effect of head position. J Clin Anesth. 2001 Sep;13(6):427–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zura, A, Doyle, DJ, Orlandi, M. Use of the Aintree intubation catheter in a patient with an unexpected difficult airway. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Jun-Jul;52(6):646–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, SR, Blank, RS. Fiberoptic intubation: an overview and update. Respir Care. 2014 Jun;59(6):865–78; discussion 878–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, DJ. GlideScope-assisted fiberoptic intubation: a new airway teaching method. Anesthesiology. 2004 Nov;101(5):1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vitin, AA, Erdman, JE. A difficult airway case with GlideScope-assisted fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2007 Nov;19(7):564–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, J, Xu, K, Ning, J, Yi, B, Lu, K. GlideScope-assisted fiberoptic bronchoscope intubation in a patient with severe rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2014 Jun;52(2):85–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, D, Kim, LJ, Ghodke, B. Successful airway management with combined use of Glidescope videolaryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope in a patient with Cowden syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2010 Jul;113(1):253–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzarulo, HH, Taylor, LA. Diabetic ‘still joint syndrome’ as a cause of difficult endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1986;64:366–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleborg, L, Norberg, AA. Are diabetic patients difficult to intubate? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988;32:508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, K, Rusy, D, Springman, SR. Difficult laryngoscopy and diabetes mellitus. Anesth. Analg. 1988;67:1162–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grfic, A, Rosenbloom, AL, Weber, FT, Giordano, B, Malone, JI. Joint contracture in childhood diabetes. New Engl J Med. 1975;292:372.Google Scholar
Seibold, JR. Digital sclerosis in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arthr Rheum. 1982;25:1357–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckingham, B, Uitto, J, Sandborg, C, Keens, T, Kaufman, F, Landing, B. Scleroderma-like syndrome and the non-enzymatic glucosylation of collagen in children with poorly controlled insulin dependent diabetes (IDDM). Pediatr Res. 1981;5:A626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashim, K, Thomas, M. Sensitivity of palm print sign in prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetes: a comparison with other airway indices. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 May;58(3):298302.Google ScholarPubMed
Nadal, JL, Fernandez, BG, Escobar, IC, Black, M, Rosenblatt, WH. The palm print as a sensitive predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Feb;42(2):199203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reissell, E, Orko, R, Maunuksela, EL, Lindgren, L. Predictability of difficult laryngoscopy in patients with long-term diabetes mellitus. Anaesthesia 1990;45:1024–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×