Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T16:03:27.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Newborn screening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2009

Joe T. R. Clarke
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Large-scale screening is a well-established way to identify members of a population, such as newborn infants, affected by a specific disease before the development of clinical signs of the condition, with the objective of initiating treatment that would prevent serious disability or even death. The initiative for most population-based screening programs rests with the state, rather than with the subject to be tested, who may not even be aware that testing is being done. In most cases, consent for testing is considered to be implied unless the individual or parent specifically objects. Therefore, the state assumes responsibility for ensuring that the facilities and resources are available to provide appropriate follow-up investigation and treatment of individuals identified by the screening program.

Screening newborn infants for PKU was the first, large-scale genetic screening initiative to be widely adopted in a direct attempt to ameliorate the impact of genetic disease. The principles that have evolved since its introduction have served as a model for the development of numerous subsequent newborn screening programs. For many years, the principles originally articulated by Wilson and Jungner for screening in general and later modified and expanded by Pollitt et al. with specific reference to newborn screening have been accepted as the criteria for neonatal screening. They are:

  1. The condition sought should be an important health problem. This is viewed as a combination of the incidence of the condition and the consequence for the affected individual.

  2. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bok, L. A., Vreken, P., Wijburg, F. A.et al. (2003). Short-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: studies in a large family adding to the complexity of the disorder. Pediatrics, 112, 1152–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001). Using tandem mass spectrometry for metabolic disease screening among newborns: a report of a work group. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50, 1–34.
Chace, D. H., Hillman, S. L., Hove, J. L. K. & Naylor, E. W. (1997). Rapid diagnosis of MCAD deficiency: quantitative analysis of octanoylcarnitine and other acylcarnitines in newborn blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry. Clinical Chemistry, 43, 2106–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Chace, D. H., Sherwin, J. E., Hillman, S. L., , Lorey F. & Cunningham, G. C. (1998). Use of phenylalanine-to-tyrosine ratio determined by tandem mass spectrometry to improve newborn screening for phenylketonuria of early discharge specimens collected in the first 24 hours. Clinical Chemisty, 44, 2405–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Chamoles, N. A., Blanco, M. B., Gaggioli, D. & Casentini, C. (2001). Hurler-like phenotype: enzymatic diagnosis in dried blood spots on filter paper. Clinical Chemistry, 47, 2098–102.Google ScholarPubMed
Clague, A. & Thomas, A. (2002). Neonatal biochemical screening for disease. Clinica Chimica Acta, 315, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services (CORN). (2000). U. S. newborn screening system guidelines II: follow-up of children, diagnosis, management, and evaluation. Journal of Pediatrics, 137 (Supplement), S1–S46.CrossRef
Koeberl, D. D., Millington, D. S., Smith, W. E.et al. (2003). Evaluation of 3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency detected by tandem mass spectrometry newborn screening. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 26, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y., Scott, C. R., Chamoles, N. A.et al. (2004). Direct multiplex assay of lysosomal enzymes in dried blood spots for newborn screening. Clinical Chemistry, 50, 1785–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meikle, P. J., Ranieri, E., Simonsen, H.et al. (2004). Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders: clinical evaluation of a two-tier strategy. Pediatrics, 114, 909–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Academy of Sciences (National Research Council). (1975). Genetic Screening: Programs, Principles, and Research. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.
Newborn Screening Task Force. Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: a blueprint for the future. (2000). Pediatrics, 106 (Supplement): 380–427.
Pandor, A., Eastham, J., Beverley, C., Chilcott, J. & Paisley, S. (2004). Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening for inborn errors of metabolism using tandem mass spectrometry: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment, 8, 1–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollitt, R. J., Green, A., McCabe, C. J.et al. (1997). Neonatal screening for inborn errors of metabolism: cost, yield and outcome. Health Technology Assessment, 1, 1–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Sackett, D. L. & Holland, W. W. (1975). Controversy in the detection of disease. Lancet, 2, 357–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, M. J., Lord, J., Bain, M. D.et al. (1998). A systematic review of evidence for the appropriateness of neonatal screening programmes for inborn errors of metabolism. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 20, 331–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcken, B., Wiley, V., Hammond, J. & Carpenter, K. (2003). Screening newborns for inborn errors of metabolism by tandem mass spectrometry. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 2304–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Newborn screening
  • Joe T. R. Clarke, University of Toronto
  • Book: A Clinical Guide to Inherited Metabolic Diseases
  • Online publication: 10 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544682.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Newborn screening
  • Joe T. R. Clarke, University of Toronto
  • Book: A Clinical Guide to Inherited Metabolic Diseases
  • Online publication: 10 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544682.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Newborn screening
  • Joe T. R. Clarke, University of Toronto
  • Book: A Clinical Guide to Inherited Metabolic Diseases
  • Online publication: 10 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544682.011
Available formats
×