Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcombe, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J. and Tannenbaum, P. H., Eds. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book. Chicago, Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Adolphs, R. (2009). ‘The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge.’ Annual Review of Psychology 60: 693–716.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Ainley, M. D. (1987). ‘The factor structure of curiosity measures: Breadth and depth of interest curiosity styles.’ Australian Journal of Psychology 39: 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ainley, M. (2006). ‘Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes.’ Educational Psychology Review 18: 391–405.Google Scholar

Ainley, M., Hidi, S. and Berndorff, D. (2002). ‘Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 94(3): 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alkire, M. T., Hudetz, A. G. and Tononi, G. (2008). ‘Consciousness and anesthesia.’ Science 322(5903): 876–880.Google Scholar

Allport, A. (1988). What concept of consciousness? In Marcel, A. J. and Brisiach, E. (Eds.), Consciousness in contemporary science (pp. 159–182). New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allport, F. H. (1937). ‘Teleonomic description in the study of personality.’ Character and Personality 5: 202–214.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1937a). Personality: A psychological interpretation. London, Constable.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1937b). ‘The functional autonomy of motives.’ American Journal of Psychology, 50: 141–156.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1943). ‘The ego in contemporary psychology.’ Psychological Review 50: 451–478.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York, MacMillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations in the psychology of personality. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1961b). Pattern and growth in personality. New York, Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity. New York, Springer- Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1993). ‘Motivational synergy: Towards new conceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace.’ Human Resource Management Review 3: 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Westview Press.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1998). ‘How to kill creativity.’ Harvard Business Review 76(5): 76–87.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. and Kramer, S. J. (2010). ‘What really motivates workers.’ Harvard Business Review 88(1): 44–45.Google Scholar

Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. In Ames, R. and Ames, C. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education, Vol 1: Student motivation (pp. 177–207). New York, Academic.Google Scholar

Ames, C. (1992). ‘Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 261–271.Google Scholar

Anselme, P. (2010). ‘The uncertainty processing theory of motivation.’ Behavioural Brain Research 208(2): 291–310.Google Scholar

Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unravelling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Antonovsky, A. (1998). The sense of coherence: An historical and future perspective. In McCubbin, H. I., Thompson, E. A., Thompson, A. I. and From, J. E. (Eds.), Stress, coping and health in families: Sense of coherence and resiliency (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Apperly, I. A. and Butterfill, S. A. (2009). ‘Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?’ Psychological Review 116(4): 953–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Apperly, I. A., Samson, D. and Humphreys, G. W. (2009). ‘Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development.’ Developmental Psychology 45: 190–201.Google Scholar

Appley, M. H. (1991). Motivation, equilibrium, and stress. In Dienster, R. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1990 (Vol. 38, pp. 1–67). Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1971). Entropy and art: An essay on disorder and order. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1982). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1996). The split and the structure: Twenty-eight essays. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1998). ‘Wolfgang Köhler and Gestalt theory: An English translation of Köhler’s introduction to Diephysischen Gestalten for philosophers and biologists.’ History of Psychology 1: 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronoff, J. (1962). ‘Freud’s conception of the origin of curiosity.’ The Journal of Psychology 54: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronson, E. (1958). The need for achievement as measured by graphic expression. In Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study (pp. 249–265). Princeton, NJ, Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J. et al. (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book (pp. 5–27). Chicago, Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. (1992). ‘The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback.’ Psychological Inquiry 3: 303–311.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocracy and self-concept. In Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103–126). Washington, DC, APA Books.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. and Carlsmith, J. M. (1962). ‘Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65: 178–182.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. and Carlsmith, J. M. (1963). ‘Effect of severity of threat on devaluation of forbidden behavior.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 584–588.Google Scholar

Aronson, E., Fried, C. and Stone, J. (1991). ‘Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy.’ American Journal of Public Health 81: 1636–1638.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. and Mills, J. (1959). ‘The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 59: 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronson, J., Cohen, G. and Nail, P. R. (1999). Self-affirmation theory: An update and appraisal. In Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 127–145). Washington, DC, APA Books.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1946a). ‘Forming impressions of personality.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41(3): 258–290.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1946b). ‘Max Wertheimer’s contribution to psychology.’ Social Research 13: 81–102.Google Scholar

Ash, M. (1995). Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. (1953). ‘The achievement motive and the recall of interrupted and completed tasks.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 46: 381–390.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. (1957). ‘Motivational determinants of risktaking behavior.’ Psychological Review 64: 359–372.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.) (1958a). Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study. Princeton, NJ, Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. (1958b). Towards experimental analysis of human motivation in terms of motives, expectancies, and incentives. In Atkinson, J. W. E. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy action and society (pp. 288–305). Princeton, NJ, Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. (1982). Old and new conceptions of how expected consequences influence actions. In Feather, N. T. (Ed.), Expectations and actions (pp. 395–420). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W., Bastian, J. R., Earl, R. W. and Litwin, G. H. (1960). ‘The achievement motive, goalsetting, and probability preferences.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 27–36.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. and Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. and Birch, D. (1974). The dynamics of achievement-oriented activity. In Atkinson, J. W. and Raynor, J. O. (Eds.), Motivation and achievement (pp. 271–325). Washington, DC, Winston.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. and Feather, N. T. (1966a). A theory of achievement motivation. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. and Feather, N. T. (1966b). Review and appraisal. In Atkinson, J. W. and Feather, N. T. (Eds.), A theory of achievement motivation (pp. 327–370). New York, Wiley.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. and Litwin, G. H. (1960). ‘Achievement motive and test anxiety conceived as motive to approach success and motive to avoid failure.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 52–63.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. and McClelland, D. C. (1948). ‘The projective expression of needs: II. The effect of different intensities of the hunger drive on thematic apperception.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 38: 643–658.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C. and Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W. and Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 98–195). New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. T. and Vancouver, J. B. (1996). ‘Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.’ Psychological Bulletin 120(3): 338–375.Google Scholar

Averill, J. R. (1991). Intellectual emotions. In Spielberger, C. D. and Sarason, I. G. (Eds.), Stress and emotion: Anxiety, anger and curiosity (Vol. 14, pp. 3–16). New York, Hemisphere Publishing.Google Scholar

Averill, J. R. (1994). Emotions are many splendored things. In Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotions: Fundamental questions (pp. 99–102). New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York, Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theater of consciousness: The workspace of the mind. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (2002a). ‘The conscious access hypothesis: Origins and recent evidence.’ Trends in Cognitive Science 6(1): 47–52.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (2002b). ‘Behaviorism redux: Review of The illusion of conscious will by Daniel M. Wegner, MIT Press 2002.’ Trends in Cognitive Science 6(6): 268–269.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (2003). Working memory requires conscious processes, not vice versa: A global workspace account. In Osaka, N. (Ed.), Neural basis of consciousness (pp. 11–26). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (2005a). ‘Global workspace theory of consciousness: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of human experience.’ Progress in Brain Research 150 (Boundaries of Consciousness: Neurobiology and Neurolopathology): 45–53.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (2005b). ‘Subjective experience is probably not limited to humans: The evidence from neurobiology and behavior.’ Consciousness & Cognition 14(1): 7–21.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. and Gage, N. M. (2007). Cognition, brain, and consciousness: Introduction to cognitive neuroscience. Amsterdam and London, Academic.Google Scholar

Baars, B. J., Ramsøy, T. Z. and Laureys, S. (2003). ‘Brain, conscious experience and the observing self.’ Trends in Neurosciences 26(12): 671–675.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford and New York, Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (1996). ‘Exploring the central executive.’ Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49: 5–28.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). ‘The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory.’ Trends in Cognitive Science 4(11): 417–423.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2012). ‘Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies.’ Annual Review of Psychology 63: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baddeley, A. D. and Della Sala, S. (1998). Working memory and executive control. In Roberts, A. C., Robbins, T. W. and Weiskrantz, L. E. (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions: Royal Society (Great Britain). Discussion Meeting (pp. 9–21). New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). New York, Academic.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. and Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple component model. In Miyake, A. and Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–61). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977a). ‘Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.’ Psychological Review 84: 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1982). ‘Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.’ American Psychologist 37(2): 122–147.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1989a). ‘Human agency in social cognitive theory.’ American Psychologist 44: 1175–1184.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1989b). Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In Pervin, L. A. (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 19–88). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In Diestbier, R. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1990: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 69–164). Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In Pervin, L. and John, O. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York, Guilford.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). ‘Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective.’ Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2008). Reconstrual of ‘free will’ from the agentic perspective or social cognitive. In Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C. and Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 86–123). Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. and Walters, R. H. (1959). Adolescent aggression. New York, Ronald Press.Google Scholar

Barnett, S. A. (1958). ‘Exploratory behavior.’ British Journal of Psychology 9: 289–310.Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F. (2006a). ‘Emotions as natural kinds?’ Perspectives on Psychological Science 1: 28–58.Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F. (2006b). ‘Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion.’ Personality and Social Psychology Review 10: 20–46.Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F. (2012). ‘Emotions are real.’ Emotion 12(3): 413–429.Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F., Lindquist, K. A., Bliss-Moreau, E., Duncan, S., Gendron, M., Mize, J. and Brennan, L. (2007). ‘Of mice and men: Natural kinds of emotions in the mammalian brain? A response to Panksepp and Izard.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science 2: 297–312.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. K. and Ruppert, J. A. (2003). Social embodiment. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. (Vol. 43, pp. 43–92). New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bartels, J. M., Magun-Jackson, S. and Ryan, J. J. (2010). ‘Dispositional approach-avoidance achievement motivation and cognitive self-regulated learning: The mediation of achievement goals.’ Individual Differences Research 8(2): 97–110.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P. and Ventis, W. L. (1992). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Batthyany, A. (2009). Reclaiming conscious agency: Mental causation after Libet. In Batthyany, A. and Elitzur, A. (Eds.), Irreducibly conscious: Selected papers on consciousness (pp. 1–27). Heidelberg, Winter.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York, Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardener (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 680–740). Boston, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (2002). ‘Religion and psychology: Introduction to the special issue.’ Psychological Inquiry 13(3): 165–167.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Free will, consciousness, and cultural animals. In Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C. and Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 3–9). Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (2016). ‘Toward a general theory of motivation: Problems, challenges, opportunities, and the big picture.’ Motivation and Emotion 40: 1–10.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. and Tice, D. M. (1998). ‘Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 1252–1265.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. and Masicampo, E. J. (2010). ‘Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal-culture interface.’ Psychological Review 117(3): 945–971.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J. and Vohs, K. D. (2011). ‘Do conscious thoughts cause behavior?’ Annual Review of Psychology 62: 331–361.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Mele, A. R. and Vohs, K. D., Eds. (2010). Free will and consciousness: How might they work? New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. and Monroe, A. E. (2014). ‘Recent research on free will: Conceptualizations, beliefs, and processes.’ Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 50: 1–52.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. and Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York, Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. and Vohs, K. D., Eds. (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York, Guilford.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N. and Zhang, L. (2007). ‘How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation.’ Personality and Social Psychology Review 11: 167–203.Google Scholar

Bayley, J. (1998). Iris: A memoir of Iris Murdoch. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar

Beauvois, J.-L. and Joule, R.-V. (1996). A radical dissonance theory. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Beauvois, J.-L. and Joule, R.-V. (1999). A radical point of view on dissonance theory. In Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 43–70). Washington, DC, APA Books.Google Scholar

Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H. and Anderson, S. (1994). ‘Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.’ Cognition 50: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. and Damasio, A. R. (1997). ‘Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy.’ Science 275: 1293–1295.Google Scholar

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. and Damasio, A. R. (2005). ‘The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 159–162.Google Scholar

Bennett, M. R., Dennett, D. C., Hacker, P. and Searle, J. (2007). Neuroscience and philosophy: Brain, mind, and language. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, M. R. and Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Malden, MA, Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1949). ‘Interest as a psychological concept.’ British Journal of Psychology 39: 184–185.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1950). ‘Novelty and curiosity as determinants of exploratory behavior.’ British Journal of Psychology 41: 68–80.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1954). ‘A theory of human curiosity.’ British Journal of Psychology 45: 180–191.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1955). ‘The arousal and satiation of perceptual curiosity in the rat.’ Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 45: 180–191.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1957). ‘Conflict and information theory variables as determinants of human perceptual curiosity.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 53: 399–404.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1958). ‘The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 55: 289–296.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1963). Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. In Koch, S. (Ed.), Psychology: The study of a science (Vol. 5, pp. 284–364). New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Structure and direction in thinking. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1966). ‘Curiosity and exploration.’ Science 153(July): 25–33.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1971a). What next? Concluding summary. In Day, H. I., Berlyne, D. E. and Hunt, D. E. E. (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education (pp. 186–196). Toronto, Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1975). ‘Behaviourism? Cognitive theory? Humanistic psychology? – To Hull with them all.’ Canadian Psychological Review 16: 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1978). ‘Curiosity and learning.’ Motivation and Emotion 2(2): 97–175.Google Scholar

Berridge, K. C. (1996). ‘Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking.’ Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review 20: 1–25.Google Scholar

Berridge, K. C. (1999). Pleasure, pain, desire, and dread: Hidden core processes of emotion. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 527–559). New York, Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Berridge, K. C. and Robinson, T. E. (1998). ‘The role of dopamine in reward: Hedonics, learning, or incentive salience?’ Brain Research Reviews 28: 308–367.Google Scholar

Beswick, B. (2012). A solution to the paradox of taste. PhD dissertation. School of Historical and Philosophical studies. The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. (1964). Theory and measurement of human curiosity. PhD dissertation. Social Relations (Social Psychology). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Available at http://www.beswick.info/psychres/BeswickCuriosity1964.html.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. (1971). Cognitive process theory of individual differences in curiosity. In Day, H. I., Berlyne, D. E. and Hunt, D. E. (Eds.), Intrinsic Motivation: A new direction in education (pp. 156–170). Toronto, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. (1974). ‘Intrinsic motivation in senior secondary school students.’ Education Research and Perspectives 1: 15–25.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. (1983). ‘The changing student population in Australia from the seventies to the eighties.’ Journal of Tertiary Educational Administration: 5–19.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. (2004). ‘From curiosity to identity: Wonder, curiosity, purpose, and identity; the function of identity in the psychology of intrinsic motivation.’ Available at http://www.beswick.info/psychres/CuriosityIdentity.htm.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. (2009). Management implications of the interaction between intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards. In Raj, R. (Ed.), Intrinsic motivation (pp. 130–159). Punagutta, Hyderabad, India, Icfai University Press.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. and Boreham, J. (1986). Development of scientific interests and competence, Research Working Paper 86.1. From a paper presented at the 53rd ANZAAS Congress, Perth, May 1983. Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. and Ramsden, P. (1987). ‘Curiosity and learning with understanding.’ Journal of Higher Education (India) 13: 26–43.Google Scholar

Beswick, D. G. and Tallmadge, G. K. (1971). ‘Re-examination of two learning style experiments in the light of the cognitive process theory of curiosity.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 62: 456–462.Google Scholar

Birch, D., Atkinson, J. W. and Bongard, K. (1974). Cognitive control of action. In Weiner, B. (Ed.), Cognitive views of human motivation (pp. 71–84). New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bless, H. (2002). ‘Where has the feeling gone? The signal function of affective states.’ Psychological Inquiry 13(1): 29–31.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (2012). ‘Religion, morality, evolution.’ Annual Review of Psychology 63: 179–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bolles, R. C. (1972). ‘Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning.’ Psychological Review 79(5): 394–409.Google Scholar

Bolles, R. C. (1974). Cognition and motivation: Some historic trends. In Weiner, B. (Ed.), Cognitive views of human motivation. (pp. 1–20). New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bolles, R. C. (1975). Theory of motivation (2nd ed.). New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London, Tavistock.Google Scholar

Boyer, P. (2003). ‘Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 119–124.Google Scholar

Brass, M. and Haggard, P. (2007). ‘To do or not to do: The neural signature of self-control.’ Journal of Neuroscience 27: 9141–9145.Google Scholar

Bratman, M. E. (1999). Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. (1956). ‘Post-decision changes in the desirability of alternatives.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 52: 384–389.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. W. (1962). Motivation effects of cognitive dissonance. In Jones, M. R. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 51–77). Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. W. and Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar

Broadbent, D. E. (1954). ‘The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 47: 191–196.Google Scholar

Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1957). ‘On perceptual readiness.’ Psychological Review 64: 123–152.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1962). On knowing; essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (2003). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Buber, M. (1937). I and thou. New York, Scribner.Google Scholar

Buck, R. (1985). ‘Prime theory: An integrated view of motivation and emotion.’ Psychological Review 92(3): 389–413.Google Scholar

Burkart, J. M. (2009). Socio-cognitive abilities in cooperative breeding. In Roska-Hardy, L. S. and Neumann, E. M. (Eds.), Learning from animals? Examining the nature of human uniqueness (pp. 123–141). New York, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Butler, R. A. (1957). ‘The effect of deprivation of visual incentives on visual exploration motivation in monkeys.’ Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 48: 247–249.Google Scholar

Butler, R. A. (1958). ‘Exploratory and related behavior: A new trend in animal research.’ Journal of Individual Psychology 14: 111–120.Google Scholar

Butterfield, H. (1949). The origins of modern science. London, G. Bell.Google Scholar

Byman, R. (2005). ‘Curiosity and sensation seeking: A conceptual and empirical examination.’ Personality and Individual Differences 38: 1365–1379.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., A. and Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). ‘Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.’ American Psychologist 119(2): 197–253.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. and Kao, C. F. (1984). ‘The efficient assessment of need for cognition.’ Journal of Personality Assessment 48: 306–307.Google Scholar

Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (1998). ‘Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens).’ Journal of Comparative Psychology 112: 192–206.Google Scholar

Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (1999). ‘A nonverbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes.’ Child Development 70: 381–395.Google Scholar

Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (2008). ‘Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12: 187–192.Google Scholar

Camazine, S. (2003). ‘Patterns in nature.’ Natural History 112(5): 34–41.Google Scholar

Camazine, S., Deneubourg, S.-L., Franks, N., Sneyd, J., Theraulag, G. and Banabeau, E. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, J. and Pierce, W. D. (1994). ‘Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation. A meta-analysis.’ Review of Educational Research 64: 363–423.Google Scholar

Cannon, W. B. (1927). ‘The James-Lange theory of emotions: A critical examination and an alternative theory.’ American Journal of Psychology 39: 106–124.Google Scholar

Cannon, W. B. (1929). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage. New York, Appleton.Google Scholar

Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R. J. and Lafrenière, M. K. (2012). ‘Towards a tripartite model of intrinsic motivation.’ Journal of Personality 80, 1147–1178.Google Scholar

Carson, R., Kelsh, N. and Pratt, C. (1998/1964). The sense of wonder. New York, HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Cartwright, D. and Harary, F. (1956). ‘Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory.’ Psychological Review 63: 277–293.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S. and Scheier, M. F. (1990). ‘Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view.’ Psychological Review 97: 19–35.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S. and Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S. and Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 42–62). San Diego, CA, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S. and Scheier, M. F. (2009). Action, affect, multitasking, and layers of control. In Forgas, J. P., Baumeister, R. and Tice, D. M. (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation (pp. 109–126). New York, London, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Cavalier, R. J. (2002). Personal motivation: A model for decision making. Westport, Praeger.Google Scholar

Cave, K. R. and Wolfe, J. M. (1990). ‘Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.’ Cognitive Psychology 22: 225–271.Google Scholar

Chan, R. C. K., Shum, D., Toulopoulou, T. and Chen, E. Y. H. (2008). ‘Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues.’ Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 23(2): 201–216.Google Scholar

Chaucer, G. (1387/1969). The Prologue and Three Tales: Edited with notes and commentary by Francis King and Bruce Steele. Melbourne, Cheshire.Google Scholar

Cherry, C. (1956). Information theory: Papers read at a symposium on information theory held at the Royal Institution, London, September 12th to 16th, 1955. London, Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar

Cherry, C. (1957). On human communication: A review, a survey, and a criticism. Cambridge, MA, Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Cherry, E. C. (1953). ‘Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears.’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25: 975–979.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959). ‘A review of B. F. Skinner’s “Verbal Behavior”.’ Language 35(1): 26–58.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Church, R. M. (1963). ‘The varied effects of punishment.’ Psychological Review 70: 369–402.Google Scholar

Clore, G. (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgement. In Martin, L. L. and Tesser, A. (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 133–163). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Clore, G. and Ortony, A. (2000). Cognition in emotion: Always, sometimes, or never? In Lane, R. D. and Nadel, L. (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 24–61). New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clore, G. L. (1994). Why emotions are felt. In Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 103–111). New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clore, G. L., Ortony, A. and Foss, M. A. 1987. ‘The psychological foundations of the affective lexicon’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 751–766.Google Scholar

Clore, G. L., Wyer, R. S., Dienes, B., Gasper, K., Gohm, C. and Isbell, L. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In Martin, L. L. and Clore, G. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s handbook (pp. 27–62). Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Coleridge, S. T. (1825). Aids to reflection in the formation of a manly character on the several grounds of prudence, morality, and religion: illustrated by select passages from our elder divines, especially from Archbishop Leighton. London, Printed for Taylor and Hessey.Google Scholar

Coleridge, S. T. and Coleridge, H. N. (1852). On the constitution of the church and state according to the idea of each. London, Edward Moxon.Google Scholar

Collins, R. P., Litman, J. A. and Spielberger, C. D. (2004). ‘The measurement of perceptual curiosity.’ Personality and Individual Differences 36: 1127–1141.Google Scholar

Conradi, P. J. (2001). Iris Murdoch: A life. London, Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Conway, M. A. and Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). ‘The construction of autobiographical memories in the self memory system.’ Psychological Review 107: 261–288.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. (1999). Unwanted consequences and the self: In search of the motivation for dissonance reduction. In Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 149–173). Washington, DC, APA Books.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. (2010). Riding the D train with Elliot: The Aronsonian legacy of cognitive dissonance. In Gonzales, M. H., Tarvis, C. and Aronson, J. (Eds.), The scientist and the humanist: A festschrift in honor of Elliot Aronson (pp. 159–174). New York, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. and Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 229–266). Orlando, FL, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, M., O’Hara, M., Schmid, P. and Wyatt, G. (2007). The handbook of person-centered psychotherapy and counseling. London, Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Corballis, M. C. (2004). ‘The origins of modernity: Was autonomous speech the critical factor?’ Psychological Review 111: 543–552.Google Scholar

Corballis, M. C. (2009). ‘The evolution of language.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1156: 19–43.Google Scholar

Corlis, C. and Wiess, J. (1973). Curiosity and openness: Empirical testing of a basic assumption. New Orleans, Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Cornwell, J. F. M. and Higgins, E. T. (2016). ‘Eager feelings and vigilant reasons: Regulatory focus differences in judging moral wrongs.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145(3): 338–355.Google Scholar

Corteen, R. S. and Wood, B. (1972). ‘Autonomic responses to shockassociated words in an unattended channel.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 94: 308–313.Google Scholar

Couch, A. and Keniston, K. (1960). ‘Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 151–174.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1988). ‘Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system.’ Psychological Bulletin 104: 163–191.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1993). ‘Activation, attention and short term memory.’ Memory & Cognition 21: 162–167.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded processes model of working memory. In Miyake, A. and Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Hove, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Crane, R. (2009). Mindfulness based cognitive therapy: Distinctive features. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar

Crick, F. (1984). ‘Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The searchlight hypothesis.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81: 4586–4590.Google Scholar

Crick, F. and Koch, C. (1990). ‘Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness.’ Seminars in Neurosciences 2: 263–275.Google Scholar

Crick, F. and Koch, C. (1995). ‘Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex?’ Nature 375: 121–123.Google Scholar

Crick, F. and Koch, C. (2003). ‘A framework for consciousness.’ Nature: Neuroscience 6: 119–126.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Nakamura, J. (2011). Positive psychology: Where did it come from, where is it going? In Sheldon, K. M., Kashdan, T. B. and Steger, M. F. (Eds.), Designing positive psychology (pp. 3–8). Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dalgleish, T. and Power, M. J. (1999). Handbook of cognition and emotion. Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore and Toronto, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (1996). ‘The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (series B) 351: 1413–1420.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (2000a). A second chance for emotion. In Lane, R. D. and Nadel, L. (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 12–23). New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (2000b). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. New York, Harcourt.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (2004). William James and the modern neurobiology of emotion. In Evans, D. and Cruse, P. (Eds.), Emotion, evolution and rationality (pp. 3–14). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (2010). Self comes to mind. New York, Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. and Anderson, S. W. (2003). The frontal lobes. In Heilman, K. M. and Valenstein, E. (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (4th ed., pp. 404–446). New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D. and Damasio, H. (1990). ‘Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli.’ Behavioural Brain Research 41: 81–94.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D. and Damasio, H. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behaviour: Theory and preliminary testing. In Levin, H. S., Eisenberg, H. M. and Benton, A. L. (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction (pp. 217–229). New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M. and Damasio, A. R. (1994). ‘The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient.’ Science 264: 1102–1105.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1872/1998). Expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1988). Beagle diary, edited by Keynes, R. D.. London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. and Barlow, N. (1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882: With original omissions restored. London, Collins.Google Scholar

Darwin, C., Ekman, P. and Prodger, P. (1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London, HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. R. (1876–1882). Recollections of the development of my mind & character: Autobiography [1876-4.1882] CUL-DAR26.1–121 Transcribed by Kees Rookmaaker. Darwin Online. Available at http://darwin-online.org.uk/.Google Scholar

Davies, P. (1999a). The fifth miracle: The search for the origin and meaning of life. New, London, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Day, H. (1969). An instrument for the measurement of intrinsic motivation: An interim report to the Department of Manpower and Immigration. Toronto, Canada, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Day, H. (1971). The measure of specific curiosity. In Day, H., Berlyne, D. E. and Hunt, D. E. (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education (pp. 99–112). Toronto, Holt, Rinehart & Winston of Canada.Google Scholar

Day, H. I. (1968). ‘The role of specific curiosity in school achievement.’ Journal of Educational Psychology 59: 37–43.Google Scholar

Day, H. I., Berlyne, D. E. and Hunt, D. E., Eds. (1971). Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education. Toronto, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

deCharms, R. (1987). Personal causation, agency, and the self. In Young-Eisendrath, P. and Hall, J. A. E. (Eds.), The book of the self (pp. 77–41). New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar

deCharms, R. (1992). Personal causation and the origin concept. In Smith, C. P. E. (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 325–333). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

deCharms, R. and Plimpton, F. (1992). The origin scoring system. In Smith, C. P. E. (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 334–375). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1971). ‘Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18: 105–155.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1972). ‘The effects of contingent and non-contingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation.’ Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 8: 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA, Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do: The dynamics of personal autonomy. New York, Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Koestner, L. R. and Ryan, R. M. (1999a). ‘The undermining effect is a reality after all – extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination: Reply to Eisenberger, Pierce and Cameron (1999) and Lepper, Henderlong, and Griingras (1999).’ Psychological Bulletin 125, 692–700.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R. M. (1999b). ‘A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.’ Psychological Bulletin 125: 627–668.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R. M. (2001). ‘Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again.’ Review of Educational Research 71(1): 1–27.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Moller, A. C. (2005). The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 579–597). New York, Guilford.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1987). ‘The support of autonomy and the control of behavior.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 1024–1037.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1991). ‘A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality.’ Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1990: 237–288.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2000). ‘The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior.’ Psychological Inquiry 11: 227–268.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2002a). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY, University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2002b). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY, University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Duhamel, J.-R., Hauser, M. D. and Rizzolatti, G., Eds. (2005). From monkey brain to human brain. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M. and Changeux, J. P. (1998). ‘A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 14529–14534.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S. and Naccache, L. (2001). ‘Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework.’ Cognition 79: 1–37.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bilan, D., Mangin, J.-R., Poline, J.-B. and Rivire, D. (2001). ‘Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming.’ Nature Neuroscience 4 (678–680): 1–37.Google Scholar

Dember, W. N. and Earl, R. W. (1957). ‘Analysis of exploratory, manipulatory, and curiosity behaviors.’ Psychological Review 64: 91–96.Google Scholar

Dembo, T. (1931). ‘Der Arger als dynamisches problem. (Untersuchungen zur Handlungs-und Affektpsychologie. X. Ed. by Kurt Lewin.) Psychologiche Forschung 15: 1–144.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1971). ‘Intentional systems.’ Journal of Philosophy 8: 87–106.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT, Bradford.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Oxford and New York, Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston, Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1998). Brainchildren: Essays on designing minds. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (2001). ‘Are we explaining consciousness yet?’ Cognition 79: 221–237.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (2003). Freedom evolves. New York, Viking.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (2004). ‘Calling in the Cartesian loans: Commentary on Wegner’s The illusion of conscious will.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 661.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York, Viking.Google Scholar

Desmond, A. and Moore, J. (2010). Darwin’s sacred cause: Race, slavery and the quest for human origins. London, Penguin.Google Scholar

Desmond, A. J. and Moore, J. R. (1991). Darwin. London, Michael Joseph.Google Scholar

Deutsch, J. A. and Deutsch, D. (1963). ‘Attention: Some theoretical considerations.’ Psychological Review 70: 80–90.Google Scholar

DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F. and Masicampo, E. J. (2008). ‘Evidence that logical reasoning depends on conscious processing.’ Consciousness and Cognition 17: 628–645.Google Scholar

Diamond, M. C. (1988). Enriching heredity. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar

Dickerson, C. A., Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E. and Miller, D. (1992). ‘Using cognitive dissonace to encourage water conservation.’ Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22: 841–854.Google Scholar

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. and Smith, H. L. (1999). ‘Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress.’ Psychological Bulletin 125: 276–302.Google Scholar

Digman, J. M. (1990). ‘Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model.’ Annual Review of Psychology 41: 417–440.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, A., Chartrand, T. L. and Aarts, H. (2007). Effects of priming and perception on social behavior and goal pursuit. In Bargh, J. A. (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 51–132). Philadelphia, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Dolan, R. J. (2002). ‘Emotion, cognition, and behavior.’ Science 298: 1191–1194.Google Scholar

Dollard, L. and Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (1985). Intrinsic motivation, perceived control, and self-evaluation maintenance: An achievement goal analysis. In Ames, R. and Ames, C. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. II, pp. 289–305). New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (1996). ‘Capturing the dynamic nature of personality.’ Journal of Research in Personality 30: 348–362.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, Random House.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. and Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In Mussen, P. and Hetherington, E. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. IV. Social and personality development (pp. 643–691). New York, Wiley.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. and Leggett, E. S. (1988). ‘A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.’ Psychological Review 95: 256–273.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. and Molden, D. C. (2005). Self theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122–140). New York and London, The Guildford Press.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1999). Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition. London, Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. A., Wichman, A. L. and Weary, G. (2009). ‘Causal uncertainty as a chronically accessible construct.’ European Journal of Social Psychology 39: 694–706.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, D., Guttman, I., Schoenbach, P. and Mills, J. (1957). ‘Postdecision exposure to relevant information.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54: 98–102.Google Scholar

Eisenberger, R. and Cameron, J. (1996). ‘Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth?’ American Psychologist 51(11): 1153–1166.Google Scholar

Eisenberger, R. and Selbst, M. (1994). ‘Does reward increase or decrease creativity?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 1116–1127.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In Cole, J. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1971 (pp. 207–283). Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1973). Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1977). Biological and cultural contributions to body and facial movement. In Blacking, J. (Ed.), A. S. A. Monograph 15, The anthropology of the body (pp. 39–84). London, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1992a). ‘Are there basic emotions.’ Psychological Review 99(3): 550–553.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1992b). ‘Facial expressions of emotions: New findings, new questions.’ Psychological Science 3: 34–38.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1992c). ‘An argument for basic emotions.’ Cognition and Emotion 6: 169–200.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1994a). All emotions are basic. In Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 15–19). New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1994b). ‘Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique.’ Psychological Bulletin 115: 268–287.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1998). Afterword: Universality of emotional expression? A personal history of the dispute. In Darwin, C. and Ekman, P. (Eds.), The expression of emotions in man and animals (pp. 363–393). London, HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1999b). Facial expressions. In Dalgleish, T. and Power, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 301–320). New York, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (1971). ‘Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17: 124–129.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R. and Friesen, W. V. (1969). ‘Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotions.’ Science, 164: 86–88.Google Scholar

Eliot, G. (1965). Middlemarch. Harmondsworth, UK, Penguin.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. (1994). Approach and avoidance achievement goals: An intrinsic motivation analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating ‘classic’ and ‘contemporary’ approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In Pintrich, P. and Maehr, M. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143–179). Greenwich, CT, JAI Press.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. (1999). ‘Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.’ Educational Psychologist 34: 169–189.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York and London, The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. (2006). ‘The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation.’ Motivation and Emotion 30(2 Special Issue: Approach/Avoidance): 111–116.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. (2008). Approach and avoidance motivation. In Elliot, A. J. (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 3–14). New York, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. and Church, M. (1997). ‘A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 218–232.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. and Covington, M. V. (2001). ‘Approach and avoidance motivation.’ Educational Psychology Review 13(2): 73–92.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S., Eds. (2005a). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York and London, The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. (2005b). Competence and motivation: Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3–12). New York and London, The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. and Harackiewicz, J. M. (1994). ‘Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 968–980.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. and Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). ‘Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 461–475.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. and McGregor, H. A. (2001). ‘A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(3): 501–519.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. and Reis, H. T. (2003). ‘Attachment and adult exploration.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 317–331.Google Scholar

Elliott, E. S. and Dweck, C. S. (1988). ‘Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 5–12.Google Scholar

Ellsworth, P. C. (1994). Some reasons to expect universal antecedents of emotion. In Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 150–154). New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Emerson, R. W. (1850/1890). Representative men; seven lectures. New York and Boston, Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar

Emmons, R. (1997). Motives and life goals. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J. and Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 485–512). San Diego, CA, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Emmons, R. A. (1986). ‘Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(5): 1058–1068.Google Scholar

Emmons, R. A. (1989). The personal striving approach to personality. In Pervin, L. A. (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 87–126). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Emmons, R. A. (1999a). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality, New York, The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Emmons, R. A. (1999b). ‘Religion in the psychology of personality: An introduction.’ Journal of Personality 67(6): 873–888.Google Scholar

Emmons, R. A. (2005). ‘Striving for the sacred: Personal goals, life meaning, and religion.’ Journal of Social Issues 61(4): 731–745.Google Scholar

Emmons, R. A., Colby, P. M. and Kaiser, H. A. (1998). Personal goals and the recovery of meaning. In Wong, P. T. P. and Fry, P. S. (Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological applications (pp. 163–178). Mahwah, NJ and London, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar

Emmons, R. A. and Paloutzian, R. F. (2003). ‘The psychology of religion.’ Annual Review of Psychology 54: 377–402.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. (1985). ‘The implications of cognitive-experiential self theory for research in social psychology and personality.’ Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 15(3): 283–310.Google Scholar

Escalona, S. K. (1940). ‘The effect of success and failure upon the level of aspiration and behavior in manic-depressive psychoses.’ University of Iowa studies in child welfare 16(199–302).Google Scholar

Evans, D. (2004). The search hypothesis of emotion. In Evans, D. and Cruse, D. (Eds.), Emotion, evolution and rationality (pp. 179–191). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1959). ‘Subjective probability and decision under uncertainty.’ Psychological Review 66: 150–164.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1961). ‘The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement related motives.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 63: 552–561.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1962). ‘The study of persistence.’ Psychological Bulletin 59: 94–115.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1963). ‘Persistence at a difficult task with alternative task of intermediate difficulty.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 604–609.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1967). ‘Valence of outcome and expectation of success in relation to task difficulty and perceived locus of control.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 7: 372–386.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1971). ‘Organization and discrepancy in cognitive structures.’ Psychological Review 78(5): 355–379.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T., Ed. (1982a). Expectations and actions. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1982b). Expectancy-value approaches: Present and future directions. In Feather, N. T. (Ed.), Expectations and actions (pp. 395–420). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1994). ‘Affective consequences of insight in art and science students.’ Cognition and Emotion 8: 489–502.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1942). ‘A theoretical interpretation of shifts in level of aspiration.’ Psychological Review 49: 335–350.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1987/1999). Reflections on cognitive dissonance: 30 years later. In Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 381–385). Washington, DC, APA Books.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. and Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). ‘Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58: 203–210.Google Scholar

Fisher, P. (1998). Wonder, the rainbow, and the aesthetics of rare experiences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, E. T. (1966). ‘Measurement of openness to experience: A study of regression in the service of the ego.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 655–663.Google Scholar

Fleming, J. and Horner, M. S. (1992). The motive to avoid success. In Smith, C. P. (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 179–189). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1987). Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of the spheres. In Phylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.), The robot’s dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence (pp. 139–149). Cambridge, MA and London, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (2005). ‘Reply to Steven Pinker “So how does the mind work?”.’ Mind and Language 20(1): 25–32.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (2006). ‘How the mind works; what we still don’t know.’ Daedalus 135: 86–94.Google Scholar

Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. and Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of self. New York, Other Press.Google Scholar

Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Ford, M. E. and Nichols, C. W. (1987). A taxonomy of human goals and some possible applications. In Ford, M. E. and Ford, D. H. (Eds.), Humans as self-constructing systems: Putting the framework to work (pp. 289–311). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Forgas, J. P., Baumeister, R. and Tice, D. M., Eds. (2009). Psychology of self-regulation. New York and London, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Forsyth, D. T. (1980). ‘The function of attributions.’ Social Psychology Quarterly 43: 184–189.Google Scholar

Fowler, H. (1965). Curiosity and exploratory behavior. New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. New York, HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Fox, M. D. and Raichle, M. E. (2007). ‘Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging.’ Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 700–711.Google Scholar

Frank, J. D. (1941). ‘Recent studies of the level of aspiration.’ Psychological Bulletin 38: 218–225.Google Scholar

Frankl, V. E. (1959). From death camp to existentialism. Boston, Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Frankl, V. E. (1962). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy: A newly revised and enlarged edition of from death-camp to existentialism. New York, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Frankl, V. E. and Batthyány, A. (2010). The feeling of meaninglessness: A challenge to psychotherapy and philosophy. Milwaukee, WI, Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Frenkel-Brunswick, E. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. In Bruner, J. S. and Krech, D. (Eds.), Perception and personality: A symposium (pp. 108–143). Durham, NC, Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1923/1962). The ego and the id. New York, Norton.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1936). The outline of psychoanalysis. London, Hogarth.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. (1994). Emotions are functional, most of the time. In Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 112–122). New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, New York and Paris, Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A. S. R. and Bem, S. (2000). Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H., Ortony, A., Sonnemans, Clore. J. and Clore, G. L. (1992). The complexity of intensity: Issues concerning the structure of emotion intensity. In Clark, M. (Ed.), Emotion: Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 60–89). Newbury Park, CA, Sage.Google Scholar

Frith, C. D. and Frith, U. (2012). ‘Mechanisms of social cognition.’ Annual Review of Psychology 63: 287–313.Google Scholar

Frost, R. (1931/2007). ‘Education by poetry.’ Amherst Graduates’ Quarterly (February). In Richardson, M. (Ed.), The Collected Prose of Robert Frost (pp. 102–111). Cambridge, MA, The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fu, G. and Lee, K. (2007). ‘Social grooming in the kindergarten: The emergence of flattery behavior.’ Developmental Science 10: 255–265.Google Scholar

Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., Brewer, L. E.; Schmeichel, B. J (2007). ‘Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92: 325–336.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1894). ‘Arithmetic by smell.’ Psychological Review 1(1): 61–62.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, J. W. (1940). ‘The use of the term “level of aspiration”.’ Psychological Review 47: 59–68.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. (1970). The bisected brain. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. (1995). ‘Principles of human brain organization derived from split-brain studies.’ Neuron 14: 217–228.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. (1997). Why can’t I control my brain? Aspects of conscious experience. In Ito, M., Miyashita, Y. and Rolls, E. E. (Eds.), Cognition, computation and consciousness (pp. 69–79). Oxford, New York and Tokyo, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The mind’s past. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). ‘Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition?’ Brain 123: 1293–1326.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). The ethical brain. New York, Dana Press.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. (2008). Human: The science behind what makes your brain unique. New York, HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. and Ledoux, J. E. (1978). The integrated mind. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Gergen, K. J. (1992). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in modern life. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, I. I., Harel, M. and Malach, R. (2006). ‘When the brain loses its self: Prefrontal inactivation during sensorimotor processing.’ Neuron 50: 329–339.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). ‘An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 1216–1229.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F. and Ostendorf, F. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands, Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). ‘Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.’ American Psychologist 54(7): 493–503.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M., Fujita, K. and Oettingen, G. (2004). Planning and the implementation of goals. In Baumeister, R. F. and Vohs, K. D. (Eds.), Hanbbook of self-regulation (pp. 211–228). New York and London, Guilford.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M., Wicklund, R. A. and Hilton, J. L. (1982). ‘Admission of failure and symbolic self-completion: Extending Lewinian theory.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43(2): 358–371.Google Scholar

Gomes, G. (1999). Volition and the readiness potential. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar

Gonzales, M. H., Tarvis, C. and Aronson, J., Eds. (2010). The scientist and the humanist: A festschrift in honor of Elliot Aronson. New York, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1991). Bully for brontosaurus: reflections in natural history. London: Hutchinson Radius.Google Scholar

Gray, J. A. (2004). Consciousness: Creeping up on the hard problem. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gray, J. R., Schaeffer, A. and Braver, S. T. (2005). Affect and the resolution of cognitive control dilemmas. In Barrett, L. F., Niedenthal, P. M. and Winkielman, P. (Eds.), Emotion and consciousness (pp. 67–94). New York and London, The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D. and Ranganath, C. (2014). “States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit.” Neuron 84: 486–496.Google Scholar

Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haggard, P. (2005). ‘Conscious intention and motor cognition.’ Trends in Cognitive Science 9: 290–295.Google Scholar

Haggard, P. (2008). ‘Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will.’ Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9: 934–946.Google Scholar

Haggard, P. and Eimer, M. (1999). ‘On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements.’ Experimental Brain Research 126: 128–133.Google Scholar

Haggard, P. and Magno, E. (1999). ‘Localizing awareness of action with transcranial magnetic stimulation.’ Experimental Brain Research 127: 102–107.Google Scholar

Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C. and Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). ‘Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis.’ Psychological Bulletin 136: 495–525.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Siegel, B. V., MacLachlan, A., Soderling, E., Lottenberg, S. and Buchsbaum, M. S. (1992). ‘Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial motor task: A positron emission tomographic study.’ Brain Research 570(1–2): 134–143.Google Scholar

Harackiewicz, J. M. (2004). Optimal motivation in education: The importance of students’ goals and interests. Supporting Student Wellbeing, Adelaide, South Australia, ACER.Google Scholar

Harackiewicz, J. M. and Sansone, C. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can’t get there from here. In Maehr, M. L. and Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 21–49). Greenwich, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harackiewicz, J. M. and Sansone, C. (2000). Rewarding competence: The importance of goals in the study of intrinsic motivation. In Sansone, C. a. J. M. and Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and perform (pp. 79–103). San Diego, CA and London, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Harlow, H. F. (1950). ‘Learning and satiation of response in intrinsically motivated complex puzzle performance by monkeys.’ Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 43: 289–294.Google Scholar

Harlow, H. F. (1953a). Motivation as a factor in the acquisition of new responses. In Jones, M. R. (Ed.), Current theory and research in motivation, symposium (pp. 24–49). Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar