Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Acknowledgments
- The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions
- 1 Revolutions in Science and Science Studies
- 2 Kuhn's Theory of Concepts
- 3 Representing Concepts by Means of Dynamic Frames
- 4 Scientific Change
- 5 Incommensurability
- 6 The Copernican Revolution
- 7 Realism, History, and Cognitive Studies of Science
- References
- Index
1 - Revolutions in Science and Science Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Acknowledgments
- The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions
- 1 Revolutions in Science and Science Studies
- 2 Kuhn's Theory of Concepts
- 3 Representing Concepts by Means of Dynamic Frames
- 4 Scientific Change
- 5 Incommensurability
- 6 The Copernican Revolution
- 7 Realism, History, and Cognitive Studies of Science
- References
- Index
Summary
THE PLACE OF KUHN'S WORK IN STUDIES OF SCIENCE
Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions became one of the most influential books of the twentieth century, although its author suffered the fate of many prophets: he was ignored by the people he most hoped to influence. His technical terms became so widely known that a popular cartoonist could depict a newly hatched chick greeting the world with the cry “Oh! Wow! Paradigm shift!” (Taves 1998) and a best-selling guide to success in life and business would tell its readers, “[W]e need to understand our own ‘paradigms’ and how to make a ‘paradigm shift’” (Covey 1990: 26). But there is no Kuhnian school of history, and many philosophers of science remain skeptical about his ideas. At the close of the twentieth century philosophers generally rejected paradigm shifts and normal science as useful categories for understanding scientific change and were still arguing about another key idea, incommensurability (Curd and Cover 1998; Hoyningen-Huene and Sankey 2001). Meanwhile Kuhn's emphasis on the historical variability of scientific standards and the role of research communities in scientific change was embraced by a new generation of sociologists of scientific knowledge. The new sociologists of science adopted Kuhn as a founding father, if not an intellectual guide: Kuhn's emphasis on the cognitive content of science was marginalized.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions , pp. 1 - 18Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006