Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T23:40:58.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Stakeholders

from Part II - Commentary principle by principle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Gauthier de Beco
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Rachel Murray
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

Although much has been said elsewhere in this book about the importance of an NHRI forging an appropriate link between government on the one hand, and civil society on the other hand, research and other work on NHRIs also stress the importance of engaging with the range of stakeholders at the national level in which the NHRI finds itself. NHRIs should thereby aim “to define and delimit the space they occupy in relation to other institutions that protect human rights, within and outside government” and in so doing “complement rather than displace the work of other bodies”.

The range of national bodies with whom the NHRI needs to engage include (but is not limited to): statutory and constitutional bodies, parliament, government, NGOs, trade unions, religious bodies, the media as well as the general public. While the Paris Principles mention most of these bodies, they do not provide a comprehensive list of actors with whom NHRIs should engage. Likewise, they do not reflect the fact that various stakeholders will have different roles towards these institutions and that these relationships may evolve or acquire more importance with time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

International Council on Human Rights Policy (ICHRP), Performance and Legitimacy: National Human Rights Institutions, 2nd edn (Versoix: ICHRP, 2004) 8Google Scholar
Carver, R. and Korotaev, A., Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions (Bratislava: UNDP, 2007)Google Scholar
Smith, A., “Access to Intervene: The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and the Northern Ireland Act 1998”, (2003) 4 European Human Rights Law Review423Google Scholar
OHCHR, Professional Training Series No. 4, National Human Rights Institutions. A Handbook on the Establishment and Strengthening of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (New York/Geneva: UN, 1995) 18Google Scholar
Hatchard, J., The Inter-Relationship between Commonwealth Human Rights Commissions and other National Human Rights Institutions (British Council: July 2003) para. 3.5 (on file with authors)Google Scholar
Azzam, F.S., “Update: The Palestinian Independent Commission for Citizens’ Rights”, (1998) 20 (2) Human Rights Quarterly 338, 346–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, L.C., “Building Democratic Institutions: The Role of National Human Rights Institutions in Good Governance and Human Rights Protection”, (2000) 13 Harvard Human Rights Journal1, 27Google Scholar
Murray, R., “The Relationship Between Parliaments and National Human Rights Institutions”, in Morison, J., McEvoy, K. and Anthony, G. (eds.), Judges, Transition, and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) 357Google Scholar
Qafisheh, M., “Defining the Role of National Human Rights Institutions with regard to the United Nations”, (2004) 36 Legal Reports Series of the Palestinian Independent Commission for Citizens’ Rights1, 21Google Scholar
Smith, A., “The Unique Position of National Human Rights Institutions: A Mixed Blessing?”, (2006) 28 Human Rights Quarterly904, 932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Council on Human Rights Policy (ICHRP) and OHCHR, Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions (Versoix/Geneva: ICHRP/OHCHR, 2005) 16Google Scholar
de Camperio, A., “The Ombudsman’s Relations with the Media”, in Danish Centre for Human Rights, The Work and Practice of Ombudsman and National Human Rights Institutions, Articles and Studies (Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Human Rights, 2002) 17Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Stakeholders
  • Gauthier de Beco, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, Rachel Murray, University of Bristol
  • Book: A Commentary on the Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565325.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Stakeholders
  • Gauthier de Beco, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, Rachel Murray, University of Bristol
  • Book: A Commentary on the Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565325.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Stakeholders
  • Gauthier de Beco, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, Rachel Murray, University of Bristol
  • Book: A Commentary on the Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565325.012
Available formats
×