Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T21:35:35.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Prosaic Intensities: The Short Prose of German Expressionism

from Prose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Neil H. Donahue
Affiliation:
Neil Donahue is Associate Professor of German and Comparative Literature, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.
Richard T. Gray
Affiliation:
Richard Gray is Professor of German at the University of Washington in Seattle
Sabine Hake
Affiliation:
Sabine Hake is Professor, Department of Germanic Studies, University of Texas at Austin
James Rolleston
Affiliation:
James Rolleston is Professor and Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures, at Duke University
Ernst Schuerer
Affiliation:
Ernst Schurer is Professor emeritus, Department of German, at Penn State University
Francis Michael Sharp
Affiliation:
F. Michael Sharp is Professor in the Department of Modern Languages and Literature at University of the Pacific in Stockton, California
Walter H. Sokel
Affiliation:
Walter H Sokol is Commonwealth Professor Emeritus of English and German at the University of Virginia
Klaus Weissenberger
Affiliation:
Klaus Weissenberger is Professor in the Department of German and Slavic Studies at Rice University, Houston, Texas
Rhys W. Williams
Affiliation:
Rhys W. Williams is professor of German and Pro-Vice-Chancellor at the University of Wales, Swansea.
Barbara D. Wright
Affiliation:
Barbara Wright is Assessment Coordinator at Eastern Connecticut State University in Willimantic, CT
Get access

Summary

The intensity of Expressionist prose, its linguistic dislocation and abstraction, rendered it thoroughly unsuited to the long form and measured pace of the novel. As Albert Soergel noted already in his monumental study Dichtung und Dichter der Zeit: Im Banne des Expressionismus (Poetry and Poets of the Age: In Thrall of Expressionism, 1925): Expressionism is “lyrischer Zwang, dramatischer Drang, nicht epischer Gang” (lyrical stress, dramatic duress, not epic progress; 796). The drama of Expressionism with its incantations and bombast also seems uncongenial to audiences in the twenty-first century. Yet the lyric poetry and short prose of Expressionism retains a capacity to shock, to unnerve, and to shatter habitual modes of perception: the Expressionist period abounds in short works of intense narrative experimentation, some successful, some less so, but which all put on display the energy and ambitions of the day to reform the genre. Such texts exhibit, despite the time that has now elapsed since their composition, remarkable virtuosity and freshness. Indeed, the formal and linguistic experimentation by the authors I shall discuss in this chapter makes their work not only challenging but also of enormous literary-historical significance.

As a literary movement Expressionism is conventionally dated between 1910 and 1925. It is characterized as sharing with other movements around the turn of the century, variously categorized as neo-Romanticism, Symbolism, Impressionism or Jugendstil, a rejection of scientific positivism and its artistic counterpart of Naturalism in literature and painting. Expressionism proper seeks to take that opposition to Naturalism to a new formal extreme, insisting that its aim is not a naturalistic depiction of the external world, nor even an impressionistic capturing of the shifting patterns of light on the surface of that reality, but an intuitive grasp of essence. Expressionist “vision” cuts through surface appearances to reveal that hidden essence. The theoretical underpinning of Expressionist writing suggests an eclectic appropriation of ideas current in art history and philosophy. One of the key influences is Wilhelm Worringer's Abstraktion und Einfühlung (Abstraction and Empathy, 1908). Worringer's thesis is that Greco-Roman art, together with Western art since the Renaissance, is an art of empathy, an art that sets out to maximize the identity or sense of recognition between the spectator and the work of art.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×