New methods in comparative/historical research have changed the face of analysis in macrosociology. Adam Przeworski has recently stated that

Yet he states that “all the methodological perspectives” found in the standard research volumes on comparative methods “had been articulated by 1970 and often long before” (p. 34). The problem is that the new methodological developments have not been incorporated into the pedagogic literature of readers and texts, much less integrated with some encompassing and coordinating framework. This volume fills this gap by concentrating on the broadly mathematical contingent of the new comparative/historical methods and doing so with a further focus on their application to the political economy of the nation and the welfare state.

The new methods stress sensitivity to time as well as place. Quantitative approaches to comparative research consist of cross-national, time-series, pooled time and cross-sectional, and event history techniques of analyses. Cross-sectional analysis has been done for over 20 years, and its methodological issues remain critical to valid analyses; however, we will not cover them in this volume. Time-series analysis has made its mark on single-nation studies in the past few years, but time-series analysis has only begun to be seriously used in comparative research, and it has many problems concerning comparability.