Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T13:24:17.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - What is complexity? Is it increasing?

from Part I - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Charles H. Lineweaver
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Paul C. W. Davies
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Michael Ruse
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access

Summary

One of the principal objects of theoretical research is to find the point of view from which the subject appears in the greatest simplicity.

(Gibbs, 1881)

Most people don't need to be persuaded that the physical world is bewilderingly complex. Everywhere we look, from molecules to clusters of galaxies, we see layer upon layer of complex structures and complex processes. The success of the scientific enterprise over the last 300 years largely stems from the assumption that beneath the surface complexity of the universe lies an elegant mathematical simplicity. The spectacular progress in particle and atomic physics, for example, comes from neglecting the complexity of materials and focusing on their relatively simple components. Similarly, the amazing advances in cosmology mostly ignore the complications of galactic structure and treat the universe in a simplified, averaged-out, approximation. Such simplified treatments, though they have carried us far, sooner or later confront the stark reality that many everyday phenomena are formidably complex and cannot be captured by traditional reductionist approaches. The most obvious and important example is biology. The techniques of particle physics or cosmology fail utterly to describe the nature and origin of biological complexity. Darwinian evolution gives us an understanding of how biological complexity arose, but is less capable of providing a general principle of why it arises. “Survival of the fittest” is not necessarily “survival of the most complex”.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blount, Z. D., Barrick, J. E., Davidson, C. J., & Lenski, R. E. (2012). Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population. Nature, 489, 513–518, .CrossRef
Dyson, F. J. (1971). Energy in the Universe. Scientific American, 225, Issue 3, pp. 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ENCODE Project Consortium, (2012). An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature, 489, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. (1881). From Gibbs's letter accepting the Rumford Medal (1881). Quoted in A. L. Mackay (1994). Dictionary of Scientific Quotations (London: Taylor & Francis).Google Scholar
Gregory, T. R. (2001). Coincidence, coevolution or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biological Review, 76, 65–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. J. (1996). Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Harmony Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazen, R. M., Papineau, D., Bleeker, W. et al. (2008). Mineral Evolution. Amer. Mineralogist, 93, 1693–1720.CrossRef
Kelvin, W. T. (1883). The Six Gateways of Knowledge, Presidential Address to the Birmingham and Midland Institute, Birmingham (3 Oct 1883). In Popular Lectures and Addresses (1891), 1, 280.
Kleidon, A. (2012). How does the Earth system generate and maintain thermodynamic disequilibrium and what does it imply for the future of the planet? Phil. Trans. R. Soc A, 370, 1012–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McShea, D. W. & Brandon, R. N. (2010). Biology's First Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meysman, F. J. R. & Bruers, S. (2010). Ecosystem functioning and maximum entropy production: a quantitative test of hypotheses, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 365, 1405–1416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulanowicz, R. E. & Hannon, B. M. (1987). Life and the production of entropy. Proc. Royal Soc. London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 232, No. 1267, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×