Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T19:35:49.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

Scott de Marchi
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, C. H. 2003. “An agenda for the new political methodology: Microfoundations and art.” Annual Review of Political Science 5:423–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, Armen. 1950. “Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58:211–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Aldrich, John. 1997. “When is it rational to vote?” In Perspectives on public choice, ed. Mueller, Dennis. New York: Cambridge University Press
Arrow, K. J. 1963. Social choice and individual values. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley
Arthur, Brian. 1989. “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events.” Economic Journal 99:116–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. “Culture dissemination.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:203–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Michael. 2003. “The other side of the coin: The hidden benefits of campaign finance.” In Computational models in political economy, ed. Kollman, Miller, Page. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Bailey, Michael, and Brady, David W.. 1998. “Heterogeneity and representation: The senate and free trade.” American Journal of Political Science 42:524–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, Dana. 1997. An introduction to natural computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Banks, Jeffrey. 2000. “Buying supermajorities in finite legislatures.” American Political Science Review 94:677–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert, Grief, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry. 1998. Analytic narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Beck, Nathaniel, King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2000. “Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: A conjecture.” American Political Science Review 94(1):21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2004. “Theory and evidence in international conflict: A response to de Marchi, Gelpi, and Grynaviski.” American Political Science Review 98:379–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellesiles, Michael. 2000. Arming America: The origins of a national gun culture. New York: Soft Skull Press
Benitez, J. M., Castro, and J. L. Requena. 1997. “Are artificial neural networks black boxes?IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks 8(5):1156–64Google Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott, and Stam, Allan. 2000. “EUGene: A conceptual manual.” International Interactions 26:179–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlekamp, Elwyn, Conway, John, and Guy, Richard. 2001. Winning ways for your mathematical plays: Volume 1. Wellesley, MA: A.K. Peters, Ltd.
Bernhardt, M. Daniel, and Ingberman, Daniel E.. 1985. “Candidate reputations and the incumbency effect.” Journal of Public Economics 27:47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Kenneth. 1992. Fun and games: A text on game theory. New York: D.C. Heath and Co
Binmore, Kenneth. 1997. “Review of the complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration.” http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/1/1/review1.html
Binmore, Kenneth, and Klemperer, Paul. 2002. The biggest auction ever: The sale of the British 3G telecom licenses. Economic Journal 112:C74–C96Google Scholar
Bishop, C. M. 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Black, Duncan. 1958. The theory of committees and elections. Repr., Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1987
Blainey, Geoffrey. 1988. The causes of war. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan
Boland, Lawrence. 1979. “A critique of Friedman's critics.” Journal of Economic Literature 17:503–22Google Scholar
Bremer, Stuart. 1992. “Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2):309–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, Dagobert, and Intriligator, Michael. 1985. “Conflict, war, and redistribution.” American Political Science Review 79:943–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Morrow, James. 1999. “Sorting through the wealth of notions.” International Security 24:56–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buthe, Tim. 2002. “Taking temporality seriously: modeling history and the use of narratives as evidence.” American Political Science Review 96:481–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall. 1985. “Robustness of the multidimensional voting model.” American Journal of Political Science 29:69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, Colin. 2003. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Marchi, Scott. 2002. “Presidential approval and legislative successJournal of Politics 64:491–509Google Scholar
Castle, Emery. 1993. “On the communication gap in agricultural economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars. 1994. “Emergent Polarity: Analyzing State Formation and Power Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 38:501–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Edwin, and Zak, Stanislaw. 1996. An introduction to optimization. New York: Wiley Interscience
Conitzer, Vincent, and Sandholm, Tuomas. 2002. “Complexity results about Nash Equilibria.” SCS Technical Report CMU-CS-02-135. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science
Conway, John. 1976. On numbers and games. New York: Academic Press
Cox, Gary, and Katz, Jonathan. 1996. “Why did the incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections grow?American Journal of Political Science 40:478–97Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Munger, Michael. 1989. “Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 U.S. House elections.” American Political Science Review 83:217–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Natalie. 1983. The return of Martin Guerre. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Davis, Otto, DeGroot, Morris, and Hinich, Melvin. 1972. “Social preference orderings and majority rule.” Econometrica 40:147–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finetti, B. 1974. Theory of probability: Volume 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons
Marchi, Scott. 1999. “Adaptive Models and Electoral Instability.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 11:393–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, Scott, Gelpi, Chris, and Grynaviski, Jeff. 2004. “Untangling neural networks.” American Political Science Review 98:371–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Marchi, Scott, and Hein Goemans. 2004. Bargaining and Complex Preferences: Examining the Case of the Israeli Electorate. Duke University Working Paper
DeGroot, Morris, and Grynaviski, Jeff. 2002. Probability and Statistics. New York: Addison Wesley
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Keeter, Scott. 1991. “Stability and change in the U.S. public's knowledge of politics.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27:133–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, M. D., and Clarke-Pearson, D. L.. 1988. “Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiving operator curves: A nonparametric approach.” Biometrics 44:837–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel. New York: W.W. Norton and Company
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row
Efromovich, Sam. 1999. Nonparametric curve estimation. New York: Springer
Enelow, James, and Hinich, Melvin. 1983. “On Plott's pairwise symmetry condition for majority rule equilibrium.” Public Choice 40:317–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enelow, James, and Hinich, Melvin. 1984. The spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press
Epstein, Joshua M., and Axtell, Robert. 1996. Growing artificial societies. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Fearon, James. 1995. “Rationalist explanations for war.” International Organization 49:379–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng-Hsiung, Hsu, Anantharaman, Thomas, Campbell, Murray, and Nowatzyk, Andreas. 1990. “A grandmaster chess machine.” Scientific American 263:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home style: house members in their districts. New York: HarperCollins
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent performance and electoral control.” Public Choice 50:5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1993. “The spatial model and elections.” In Information, participation, and choice, ed. Grofman, B., 107–124. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Fiorina, Morris. 1974. Representation, roll calls, and constituencies. New York: D.C. Heath
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Fiorina, Morris, and Noll, Roger. 1979. “Majority rule models and legislative elections.” The Journal of Politics 41:1081–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles, and Mark Rich. n.d. “Emergent formation of political parties.” University of Wisconsin Working Paper
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The methodology of positive economics.” In Essays in positive economics, 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Garfinkel, Michelle, and Skaperdas, Stergios. 2000. “Conflict without misperceptions or incomplete information.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 1999. “War is in the error term.” International Organization 53:567–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentle, James. 2002. Elements of computational statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag
Gerber, Elisabeth, and Jeffrey Lewis. n.d. “Representing heterogeneous districts.” Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan Working paper
Gibbon, Edward. 1776–1788. The decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Repr., New York: Everyman's Library, 1993
Goemans, Hein. 2000. War and punishment, the causes of war termination and the first world war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Gonzalez, S. 2000. “Neural networks for macroeconomic forecasting: A complementary approach to linear regression models.” Papers Series of Ministere des Finances du Canada 2000–07
Good, Phillip, and Hardin, James. 2003. Common errors in statistics (and how to avoid them). New York: Wiley-Interscience
Granger, Clive. 1999. Empirical modeling in economics. New York: Cambridge
Green, Donald, and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of rational choice theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Greene, William. 1997. Econometric analysis. New York: Prentice Hall
Griffiths, William, Hill, Carter, and Judge, George. Learning and practicing econometrics. New York: Wiley
Groseclose, Tim, and Jeffrey Milyo. 2004a. “A Test of Media Bias.” Working Paper
Groseclose, Tim, and Jeffrey Milyo. 2004b. “Buying the bums out: What's the dollar value of a seat in Congress?” Working Paper
Groseclose, Tim, and Snyder, James. 2000. “Vote buying, supermajorities, and flooded coalitions.” American Political Science Review 94:683–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, J. A., and McNeil, B. J.. 1982. “The meaning and use of the area under a receiving operator characteristic (ROC) curve.” Radiology 143:26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, Frank. 2001. Regression modeling strategies. New York: Springer
Hastie, Trevor, Tibshirani, Robert, and Friedman, Jerome. 2001. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer
Hausman, Daniel, ed. 1984. The philosophy of economics: An anthology. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hendry, David. 1993. Econometrics: Methodology. Oxford: Blackwell
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1994. Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1997. Analytical politics. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hirsch, Abraham, and Marchi, Neil. 1984. “Methodology: A comment on Frazer and Boland.” The American Economic Review 74:782–88Google Scholar
Holland, John. 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Holland, John, and Miller, John. 1991. “Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory.” The American Economic Review 81:365–70Google Scholar
Hong, Lu, and Scott Page. 1998. “Diversity and optimality.” Working Paper, Santa Fe Institute
Isard, Walter, and Anderton, Charles. 1999. “Survey of the peace economics literature: Recent key contributions and a comprehensive coverage up to 1992.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 5:1–93Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 1996. “House elections in perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111:203–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, Kenneth. 1998. Numerical methods in economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.” Econometrica 47:263–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzner, Donald. 1970. Static demand theory. New York: Macmillan
Kauffman, Stuart. 1993. The origins of order. New York: Oxford University Press
Kauffman, Stuart, and Levin, S. 1987. “Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 128: 11–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart, and Weinberger, E. 1989. “The N-k model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 141: 211Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The rise and fall of the great powers. New York: D.C. Heath and Company
Keynes, John Maynard. 1939. “Professor Tinbergen's method,” Economic Journal 49:558–68Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing social inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2001. “Improving forecasts of state failure.” World Politics 53:623–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kmenta, Jan. 1997. Elements of Econometrics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John, and Page, Scott. 1992. “Adaptive parties in spatial elections.” American Political Science Review 86:929–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John, and Page, Scott. 1998. “Political parties and electoral landscapes.” British Journal of Political Science 28:139–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald. 1973. “On a class of equilibrium conditions for majority rule.” Econometrica 41:285–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D., and Wilson, R.. 1982. “Reputation and imperfect information.” Journal of Economic Theory 27:233–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon, and Berent, Matthew. 1993. “Comparisons of party identification and political preferences: The impact of survey question format.” American Journal of Political Science 37:941–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Harold, and Nasar, Sylvia, eds. 2002. The essential John Nash. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Kuklinski, James, Metlay, Daniel, and Kay, W.. 1982. “Citizen knowledge and choices on the complex issue of nuclear energy.” American Journal of Political Science 26:615–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, Dean. 2001a. “Nonseparable preferences, measurement error, and unstable survey responses.” Political Analysis 9(2):1–21Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean. 2001b. “A Theory of nonseparable preferences in survey responses.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2):239–58Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean, and Niou, Emerson. 2000. “A Problem with Referenda.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Charles, and March, James. 1975. An introduction to models in the social sciences. New York: HarperCollins
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Matthew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. 2000. Elements of reason. New York: Cambridge University Press
Lustick, Ian S. 1996. “History, historiography, and political science: multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias.” American Political Science Review 90(3):605–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian S. 1999. “Collective identity.” Journal of artificial societies and social simulation. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/3/1
Lustick, Ian S., Miodownik, Dan, and Eidelson, Roy J.. 2004. “Secessionism in multicultural states: Does sharing power prevent or encourage it?American Political Science Review 98(2):209–29Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Snyder, Jack. 1995. “Democratization and the danger of war.” International Security 20:5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce M.. 1993. “Normative and structural causes of democratic peace.” American Political Science Review 87(3):624–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, Roger. 1988. “Happy warriors: Leaders' facial displays, viewers' emotions, and political support.” American Journal of Political Science 32:345–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1985a. “Elections with limited information.” Journal of Economic Theory 36:55–85Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1985b. “Retrospective voting and elections with limited information.” American Political Science ReviewGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models.” Econometrica 47:1085–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, John. 1998. “Active Nonlinear Tests (ANTs) of complex simulations models.” Management Science 44(6):820–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, John, and Scott Page. In press. “The Standing Ovation Problem.” Complexity
Milyo, Jeffrey. 2000. “Logical deficiencies in spatial models: A constructive critique.” Public Choice 105:273–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie. 1996. An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Morrow, James. 1989. “A twist of truth: A reexamination of the effects of arms races on the occurrence of war.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 33:500–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Dennis. 1989. Public Choice II. New York: Cambridge University Press
Mueller, Dennis. 2003. Public choice III. New York: Cambridge University Press
Murphy, Allan H., and Winkler, Robert L.. 1992. “Diagnostic verification of probability forecasts.” International Journal of Forecasting 7:435–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The structure of science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc
Nagel, Ernest. 1963. “Assumptions in economic theory.” The American Economic Review 53:211–19Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 2002. Empirical implications of theoretical modeling report. Political Science Program, Directorate For Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences
Niou, Emerson, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1991. “Realism vs. neoliberalism: A formulation.” American Journal of Political Science 35:481–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niou, Emerson, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1999. “Return of the Luddites.” International Security 24:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, Peter. 1998. That noble dream: The “objectivity question” and the American historical profession. New York: Cambridge University Press
Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce. 1999. “Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 36:423–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Martin, and Rubinstein, Ariel. 1990. Bargaining and market. San Diego: Academic Press
Page, Benjamin. 1977. “Elections and social choice: The state of the evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 21:639–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott. 1996. “Two measures of difficulty.” Economic Theory 8: 321–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott. n.d. “The p-alpha model of rugged policies.” University of Michigan Working Paper
Papadimitriou, Christos. 1994. Computational complexity. New York: Addison-Wesley
Peltzman, Samuel. 1991. “Review of The Handbook of Industrial Organization.” Journal of Political Economy 99:201–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, Charles. 1967. “A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule.” American Economic Review 57:787–806Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1993. “Guns, butter, and anarchy.” American Political Science Review 87:115–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1999. “The modeling enterprise and security studies.” International Security 24:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primo, David, and Jeffrey Milyo. (2004). “Campaign finance and political efficacy: Evidence from the states.” University of Rochester Working Paper
Rabinowitz, George, and MacDonald, Stuart. 1989. “A directional theory of issue voting.” American Political Science Review 83:93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, and MacDonald, Stuart. 1993. “Direction and uncertainty in a model of issue voting.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 5:61–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, Stuart MacDonald, and Ola Listhaug. 2004. “Simulating models of issue voting.” UNC–Chapel Hill Working Paper
Ramsay, Kristopher, and Curt Signorino. 2003. “A statistical model of the divide the dollar game.” University of Rochester Working Paper
Rousseau, David, Gelpi, Christopher, Reiter, Dan, and Huth, Paul. 1996. “Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace.” American Political Science Review 90(3):512–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Stuart, and Norvig, Peter. 1995. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. New York: Prentice Hall
Samuelson, Paul. 1963. “Discussion.” The American Economic Review 53:227–36Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton and Co
Schofield, Norman. 1984. “Social equilibrium and cycles on compact sets.” Journal of Economic Theory 33:59–71CrossRef
Scott, Paul, and Fasli, Maria. 2001. “Benford's Law: An empirical investigation and a novel explanation.” CSM Technical Report349Google Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle, and Allen, James. 2004. “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 48:493–512Google Scholar
Selten, R. 1978. “The Chain-Store Paradox.” Theory and Decision 9:127–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Robert, and Lawrence Jacobs. 1989. “The relationship between public opinion and public policy: A review.” In Political Behavior Annual, ed. Long, Samuel. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Signorino, Curtis. 1999. “Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict.” American Political Science Review 93:279–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1963. “Discussion.” The American Economic Review 53:227–36Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of empire: Domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Spanos, Aris. 1986. Statistical foundations of econometric modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stata Corporation. 2003. Stata Reference Manual, Release 8. College Station, TX: Stata Press
Stokes, Donald. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57:368–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, Rangarajan. 1996. A first course in optimization theory. New York: Cambridge University Press
Swets, John. 1988. “Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.” Science 240(4857):1285–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles, and Marco Steenbergen. 1995. “Computational experiments in electoral behavior.” In Political judgement: Structure and process, eds. Lodge, Milton and McGraw, Kathleen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Taber, Charles, and Timpone, Richard. 1996. “Computational modeling.” Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences07–113Google Scholar
Taylor, Howard, and Karlin, Samuel 1998. An introduction to stochastic modeling. New York: Academic Press
Toynbee, Arnold. 1946. A study of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Turk, Matthew, and Pentland, Alex. 1991. “Eigenfaces for recognition.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Henry. 1982. “A review of The Collapse of the Weimar Republic: Political Economy and Crisis.” Political Science Quarterly 97(4):739–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, John, and Morgenstern, Oskar. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Walt, Stephen. 1999a. “Rigor or rigor mortis?International Security 23:5–48Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen. 1999b. “A model disagreement.” International Security 24:115–30Google Scholar
Wassily, Leontief. 1993. “Can economics be reconstructed as an empirical science?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75:supplementGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, E. 1988. “A more rigorous derivation of some results on rugged fitness landscapes.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 134:125–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, E. 1990. “Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference.” Biological Cybernetics 63:325–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, John. 2003. “Speed of gravity and light equal.” Nature. http://www.nature.com/nsu/030106/030106-8.html
The William, and Quarterly, Mary. 2002. Forum: Historians and Guns. 59:203–68
Wilson, Rick, and Catherine Eckel. 1999. “Why fairness?: Facial expressions, evolutionary psychology and the emergence of fairness in simple bargaining games.” Invited presentation, Departments of Political Science and Psychology, University of Oregon
Yates, J. Frank. 1990. Judgment and decision-making. New York: Prentice Hall
Young, Peyton. 2001. Individual strategy and social structure: An evolutionary theory of institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Zaller, John. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press
Achen, C. H. 2003. “An agenda for the new political methodology: Microfoundations and art.” Annual Review of Political Science 5:423–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, Armen. 1950. “Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58:211–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Aldrich, John. 1997. “When is it rational to vote?” In Perspectives on public choice, ed. Mueller, Dennis. New York: Cambridge University Press
Arrow, K. J. 1963. Social choice and individual values. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley
Arthur, Brian. 1989. “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events.” Economic Journal 99:116–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. “Culture dissemination.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:203–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Michael. 2003. “The other side of the coin: The hidden benefits of campaign finance.” In Computational models in political economy, ed. Kollman, Miller, Page. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Bailey, Michael, and Brady, David W.. 1998. “Heterogeneity and representation: The senate and free trade.” American Journal of Political Science 42:524–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, Dana. 1997. An introduction to natural computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Banks, Jeffrey. 2000. “Buying supermajorities in finite legislatures.” American Political Science Review 94:677–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert, Grief, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry. 1998. Analytic narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Beck, Nathaniel, King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2000. “Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: A conjecture.” American Political Science Review 94(1):21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2004. “Theory and evidence in international conflict: A response to de Marchi, Gelpi, and Grynaviski.” American Political Science Review 98:379–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellesiles, Michael. 2000. Arming America: The origins of a national gun culture. New York: Soft Skull Press
Benitez, J. M., Castro, and J. L. Requena. 1997. “Are artificial neural networks black boxes?IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks 8(5):1156–64Google Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott, and Stam, Allan. 2000. “EUGene: A conceptual manual.” International Interactions 26:179–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlekamp, Elwyn, Conway, John, and Guy, Richard. 2001. Winning ways for your mathematical plays: Volume 1. Wellesley, MA: A.K. Peters, Ltd.
Bernhardt, M. Daniel, and Ingberman, Daniel E.. 1985. “Candidate reputations and the incumbency effect.” Journal of Public Economics 27:47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Kenneth. 1992. Fun and games: A text on game theory. New York: D.C. Heath and Co
Binmore, Kenneth. 1997. “Review of the complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration.” http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/1/1/review1.html
Binmore, Kenneth, and Klemperer, Paul. 2002. The biggest auction ever: The sale of the British 3G telecom licenses. Economic Journal 112:C74–C96Google Scholar
Bishop, C. M. 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Black, Duncan. 1958. The theory of committees and elections. Repr., Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1987
Blainey, Geoffrey. 1988. The causes of war. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan
Boland, Lawrence. 1979. “A critique of Friedman's critics.” Journal of Economic Literature 17:503–22Google Scholar
Bremer, Stuart. 1992. “Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2):309–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, Dagobert, and Intriligator, Michael. 1985. “Conflict, war, and redistribution.” American Political Science Review 79:943–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Morrow, James. 1999. “Sorting through the wealth of notions.” International Security 24:56–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buthe, Tim. 2002. “Taking temporality seriously: modeling history and the use of narratives as evidence.” American Political Science Review 96:481–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall. 1985. “Robustness of the multidimensional voting model.” American Journal of Political Science 29:69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, Colin. 2003. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Marchi, Scott. 2002. “Presidential approval and legislative successJournal of Politics 64:491–509Google Scholar
Castle, Emery. 1993. “On the communication gap in agricultural economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars. 1994. “Emergent Polarity: Analyzing State Formation and Power Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 38:501–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Edwin, and Zak, Stanislaw. 1996. An introduction to optimization. New York: Wiley Interscience
Conitzer, Vincent, and Sandholm, Tuomas. 2002. “Complexity results about Nash Equilibria.” SCS Technical Report CMU-CS-02-135. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science
Conway, John. 1976. On numbers and games. New York: Academic Press
Cox, Gary, and Katz, Jonathan. 1996. “Why did the incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections grow?American Journal of Political Science 40:478–97Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Munger, Michael. 1989. “Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 U.S. House elections.” American Political Science Review 83:217–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Natalie. 1983. The return of Martin Guerre. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Davis, Otto, DeGroot, Morris, and Hinich, Melvin. 1972. “Social preference orderings and majority rule.” Econometrica 40:147–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finetti, B. 1974. Theory of probability: Volume 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons
Marchi, Scott. 1999. “Adaptive Models and Electoral Instability.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 11:393–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, Scott, Gelpi, Chris, and Grynaviski, Jeff. 2004. “Untangling neural networks.” American Political Science Review 98:371–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Marchi, Scott, and Hein Goemans. 2004. Bargaining and Complex Preferences: Examining the Case of the Israeli Electorate. Duke University Working Paper
DeGroot, Morris, and Grynaviski, Jeff. 2002. Probability and Statistics. New York: Addison Wesley
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Keeter, Scott. 1991. “Stability and change in the U.S. public's knowledge of politics.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27:133–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, M. D., and Clarke-Pearson, D. L.. 1988. “Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiving operator curves: A nonparametric approach.” Biometrics 44:837–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel. New York: W.W. Norton and Company
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row
Efromovich, Sam. 1999. Nonparametric curve estimation. New York: Springer
Enelow, James, and Hinich, Melvin. 1983. “On Plott's pairwise symmetry condition for majority rule equilibrium.” Public Choice 40:317–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enelow, James, and Hinich, Melvin. 1984. The spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press
Epstein, Joshua M., and Axtell, Robert. 1996. Growing artificial societies. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Fearon, James. 1995. “Rationalist explanations for war.” International Organization 49:379–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng-Hsiung, Hsu, Anantharaman, Thomas, Campbell, Murray, and Nowatzyk, Andreas. 1990. “A grandmaster chess machine.” Scientific American 263:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home style: house members in their districts. New York: HarperCollins
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent performance and electoral control.” Public Choice 50:5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1993. “The spatial model and elections.” In Information, participation, and choice, ed. Grofman, B., 107–124. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Fiorina, Morris. 1974. Representation, roll calls, and constituencies. New York: D.C. Heath
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Fiorina, Morris, and Noll, Roger. 1979. “Majority rule models and legislative elections.” The Journal of Politics 41:1081–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles, and Mark Rich. n.d. “Emergent formation of political parties.” University of Wisconsin Working Paper
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The methodology of positive economics.” In Essays in positive economics, 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Garfinkel, Michelle, and Skaperdas, Stergios. 2000. “Conflict without misperceptions or incomplete information.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 1999. “War is in the error term.” International Organization 53:567–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentle, James. 2002. Elements of computational statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag
Gerber, Elisabeth, and Jeffrey Lewis. n.d. “Representing heterogeneous districts.” Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan Working paper
Gibbon, Edward. 1776–1788. The decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Repr., New York: Everyman's Library, 1993
Goemans, Hein. 2000. War and punishment, the causes of war termination and the first world war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Gonzalez, S. 2000. “Neural networks for macroeconomic forecasting: A complementary approach to linear regression models.” Papers Series of Ministere des Finances du Canada 2000–07
Good, Phillip, and Hardin, James. 2003. Common errors in statistics (and how to avoid them). New York: Wiley-Interscience
Granger, Clive. 1999. Empirical modeling in economics. New York: Cambridge
Green, Donald, and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of rational choice theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Greene, William. 1997. Econometric analysis. New York: Prentice Hall
Griffiths, William, Hill, Carter, and Judge, George. Learning and practicing econometrics. New York: Wiley
Groseclose, Tim, and Jeffrey Milyo. 2004a. “A Test of Media Bias.” Working Paper
Groseclose, Tim, and Jeffrey Milyo. 2004b. “Buying the bums out: What's the dollar value of a seat in Congress?” Working Paper
Groseclose, Tim, and Snyder, James. 2000. “Vote buying, supermajorities, and flooded coalitions.” American Political Science Review 94:683–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, J. A., and McNeil, B. J.. 1982. “The meaning and use of the area under a receiving operator characteristic (ROC) curve.” Radiology 143:26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, Frank. 2001. Regression modeling strategies. New York: Springer
Hastie, Trevor, Tibshirani, Robert, and Friedman, Jerome. 2001. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer
Hausman, Daniel, ed. 1984. The philosophy of economics: An anthology. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hendry, David. 1993. Econometrics: Methodology. Oxford: Blackwell
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1994. Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1997. Analytical politics. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hirsch, Abraham, and Marchi, Neil. 1984. “Methodology: A comment on Frazer and Boland.” The American Economic Review 74:782–88Google Scholar
Holland, John. 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Holland, John, and Miller, John. 1991. “Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory.” The American Economic Review 81:365–70Google Scholar
Hong, Lu, and Scott Page. 1998. “Diversity and optimality.” Working Paper, Santa Fe Institute
Isard, Walter, and Anderton, Charles. 1999. “Survey of the peace economics literature: Recent key contributions and a comprehensive coverage up to 1992.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 5:1–93Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 1996. “House elections in perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111:203–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, Kenneth. 1998. Numerical methods in economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.” Econometrica 47:263–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzner, Donald. 1970. Static demand theory. New York: Macmillan
Kauffman, Stuart. 1993. The origins of order. New York: Oxford University Press
Kauffman, Stuart, and Levin, S. 1987. “Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 128: 11–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart, and Weinberger, E. 1989. “The N-k model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 141: 211Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The rise and fall of the great powers. New York: D.C. Heath and Company
Keynes, John Maynard. 1939. “Professor Tinbergen's method,” Economic Journal 49:558–68Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing social inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2001. “Improving forecasts of state failure.” World Politics 53:623–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kmenta, Jan. 1997. Elements of Econometrics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John, and Page, Scott. 1992. “Adaptive parties in spatial elections.” American Political Science Review 86:929–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John, and Page, Scott. 1998. “Political parties and electoral landscapes.” British Journal of Political Science 28:139–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald. 1973. “On a class of equilibrium conditions for majority rule.” Econometrica 41:285–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D., and Wilson, R.. 1982. “Reputation and imperfect information.” Journal of Economic Theory 27:233–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon, and Berent, Matthew. 1993. “Comparisons of party identification and political preferences: The impact of survey question format.” American Journal of Political Science 37:941–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Harold, and Nasar, Sylvia, eds. 2002. The essential John Nash. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Kuklinski, James, Metlay, Daniel, and Kay, W.. 1982. “Citizen knowledge and choices on the complex issue of nuclear energy.” American Journal of Political Science 26:615–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, Dean. 2001a. “Nonseparable preferences, measurement error, and unstable survey responses.” Political Analysis 9(2):1–21Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean. 2001b. “A Theory of nonseparable preferences in survey responses.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2):239–58Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean, and Niou, Emerson. 2000. “A Problem with Referenda.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Charles, and March, James. 1975. An introduction to models in the social sciences. New York: HarperCollins
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Matthew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. 2000. Elements of reason. New York: Cambridge University Press
Lustick, Ian S. 1996. “History, historiography, and political science: multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias.” American Political Science Review 90(3):605–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian S. 1999. “Collective identity.” Journal of artificial societies and social simulation. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/3/1
Lustick, Ian S., Miodownik, Dan, and Eidelson, Roy J.. 2004. “Secessionism in multicultural states: Does sharing power prevent or encourage it?American Political Science Review 98(2):209–29Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Snyder, Jack. 1995. “Democratization and the danger of war.” International Security 20:5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce M.. 1993. “Normative and structural causes of democratic peace.” American Political Science Review 87(3):624–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, Roger. 1988. “Happy warriors: Leaders' facial displays, viewers' emotions, and political support.” American Journal of Political Science 32:345–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1985a. “Elections with limited information.” Journal of Economic Theory 36:55–85Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1985b. “Retrospective voting and elections with limited information.” American Political Science ReviewGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models.” Econometrica 47:1085–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, John. 1998. “Active Nonlinear Tests (ANTs) of complex simulations models.” Management Science 44(6):820–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, John, and Scott Page. In press. “The Standing Ovation Problem.” Complexity
Milyo, Jeffrey. 2000. “Logical deficiencies in spatial models: A constructive critique.” Public Choice 105:273–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie. 1996. An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press
Morrow, James. 1989. “A twist of truth: A reexamination of the effects of arms races on the occurrence of war.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 33:500–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Dennis. 1989. Public Choice II. New York: Cambridge University Press
Mueller, Dennis. 2003. Public choice III. New York: Cambridge University Press
Murphy, Allan H., and Winkler, Robert L.. 1992. “Diagnostic verification of probability forecasts.” International Journal of Forecasting 7:435–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The structure of science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc
Nagel, Ernest. 1963. “Assumptions in economic theory.” The American Economic Review 53:211–19Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 2002. Empirical implications of theoretical modeling report. Political Science Program, Directorate For Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences
Niou, Emerson, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1991. “Realism vs. neoliberalism: A formulation.” American Journal of Political Science 35:481–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niou, Emerson, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1999. “Return of the Luddites.” International Security 24:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, Peter. 1998. That noble dream: The “objectivity question” and the American historical profession. New York: Cambridge University Press
Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce. 1999. “Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 36:423–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Martin, and Rubinstein, Ariel. 1990. Bargaining and market. San Diego: Academic Press
Page, Benjamin. 1977. “Elections and social choice: The state of the evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 21:639–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott. 1996. “Two measures of difficulty.” Economic Theory 8: 321–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott. n.d. “The p-alpha model of rugged policies.” University of Michigan Working Paper
Papadimitriou, Christos. 1994. Computational complexity. New York: Addison-Wesley
Peltzman, Samuel. 1991. “Review of The Handbook of Industrial Organization.” Journal of Political Economy 99:201–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, Charles. 1967. “A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule.” American Economic Review 57:787–806Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1993. “Guns, butter, and anarchy.” American Political Science Review 87:115–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1999. “The modeling enterprise and security studies.” International Security 24:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primo, David, and Jeffrey Milyo. (2004). “Campaign finance and political efficacy: Evidence from the states.” University of Rochester Working Paper
Rabinowitz, George, and MacDonald, Stuart. 1989. “A directional theory of issue voting.” American Political Science Review 83:93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, and MacDonald, Stuart. 1993. “Direction and uncertainty in a model of issue voting.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 5:61–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, Stuart MacDonald, and Ola Listhaug. 2004. “Simulating models of issue voting.” UNC–Chapel Hill Working Paper
Ramsay, Kristopher, and Curt Signorino. 2003. “A statistical model of the divide the dollar game.” University of Rochester Working Paper
Rousseau, David, Gelpi, Christopher, Reiter, Dan, and Huth, Paul. 1996. “Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace.” American Political Science Review 90(3):512–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Stuart, and Norvig, Peter. 1995. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. New York: Prentice Hall
Samuelson, Paul. 1963. “Discussion.” The American Economic Review 53:227–36Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton and Co
Schofield, Norman. 1984. “Social equilibrium and cycles on compact sets.” Journal of Economic Theory 33:59–71CrossRef
Scott, Paul, and Fasli, Maria. 2001. “Benford's Law: An empirical investigation and a novel explanation.” CSM Technical Report349Google Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle, and Allen, James. 2004. “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 48:493–512Google Scholar
Selten, R. 1978. “The Chain-Store Paradox.” Theory and Decision 9:127–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Robert, and Lawrence Jacobs. 1989. “The relationship between public opinion and public policy: A review.” In Political Behavior Annual, ed. Long, Samuel. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Signorino, Curtis. 1999. “Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict.” American Political Science Review 93:279–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1963. “Discussion.” The American Economic Review 53:227–36Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of empire: Domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Spanos, Aris. 1986. Statistical foundations of econometric modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stata Corporation. 2003. Stata Reference Manual, Release 8. College Station, TX: Stata Press
Stokes, Donald. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57:368–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, Rangarajan. 1996. A first course in optimization theory. New York: Cambridge University Press
Swets, John. 1988. “Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.” Science 240(4857):1285–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles, and Marco Steenbergen. 1995. “Computational experiments in electoral behavior.” In Political judgement: Structure and process, eds. Lodge, Milton and McGraw, Kathleen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Taber, Charles, and Timpone, Richard. 1996. “Computational modeling.” Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences07–113Google Scholar
Taylor, Howard, and Karlin, Samuel 1998. An introduction to stochastic modeling. New York: Academic Press
Toynbee, Arnold. 1946. A study of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Turk, Matthew, and Pentland, Alex. 1991. “Eigenfaces for recognition.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Henry. 1982. “A review of The Collapse of the Weimar Republic: Political Economy and Crisis.” Political Science Quarterly 97(4):739–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, John, and Morgenstern, Oskar. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Walt, Stephen. 1999a. “Rigor or rigor mortis?International Security 23:5–48Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen. 1999b. “A model disagreement.” International Security 24:115–30Google Scholar
Wassily, Leontief. 1993. “Can economics be reconstructed as an empirical science?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75:supplementGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, E. 1988. “A more rigorous derivation of some results on rugged fitness landscapes.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 134:125–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, E. 1990. “Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference.” Biological Cybernetics 63:325–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, John. 2003. “Speed of gravity and light equal.” Nature. http://www.nature.com/nsu/030106/030106-8.html
The William, and Quarterly, Mary. 2002. Forum: Historians and Guns. 59:203–68
Wilson, Rick, and Catherine Eckel. 1999. “Why fairness?: Facial expressions, evolutionary psychology and the emergence of fairness in simple bargaining games.” Invited presentation, Departments of Political Science and Psychology, University of Oregon
Yates, J. Frank. 1990. Judgment and decision-making. New York: Prentice Hall
Young, Peyton. 2001. Individual strategy and social structure: An evolutionary theory of institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Zaller, John. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Scott de Marchi, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 23 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510588.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Scott de Marchi, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 23 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510588.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Scott de Marchi, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 23 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510588.008
Available formats
×