Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I. & McDermott, R. (2006). Identity as a Variable, Perspectives on Politics, 4(4): 695–711.Google Scholar

Adams, K. & Hyon, J. (2005). Towards a System of Systems Methodologies, Once Again, paper presented at the 26th ASEM National Conference, October, www.asem.org/conferences/2005conferenceproceedings/92.pdf.Google Scholar

Adeyemo, D. A. (2007). Moderating Influence of Emotional Intelligence on the Link Between Academic Self-Efficacy and Achievement of University Students, Psychology Developing Societies, 19(2): 199–213.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar

Ahmadian, S., Azarshahi, S. & Paulhus, D. L. (2016). Explaining Donald Trump via Communication Style: Grandiosity, Informality, and Dynamisms, Personality and Individual Differences, 107: 49–53.Google Scholar

Åkerman, K. K., Kuikka, J. T., Çiftçioglu, N., Parkkinen, J., Bergström, K. A., Kuronen, I. & Kajander, E. O. (1997). Radiolabeling and In Vivo Distribution of Nanobacteria in Rabbit, Proceedings SPIE, 3111: 436–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Åkerman, K. K., Kuronen, I. & Kajander, E. O. (1993). Scanning Electron Microscopy of Nanobacteria-Novel Biofilm Producing Organisms in Blood, Scanning, 15(Suppl. 3): 90–91, www.nanobac.com/Klin%20lab/abstract34.htm.Google Scholar

Alcoff, L. M. (2006). Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Allen, N. J. (1985). The Category of the Person: A Reading of Mauss’s Last Essay, in Carrithers, M., Collins, S. & Lukes, S. (Eds.), The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (pp. 26–35).Google Scholar

Allen, W. (2007). Australian Political Discourse: Pronominal Choice in Campaign Speeches, in Selected Papers from the 2006 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2): 357–376.Google Scholar

Andersen, J. A. (2000). Intuition in Managers: Are Intuitive Managers More Effective? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(1): 46–63.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. H. & Grey, C. W. (2006). Anticorruption in Transition 3: Who Is Succeeding and Why? The World Bank, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTECA/Resources/ACT.pdf.Google Scholar

Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C. K. S., et al. (2007). Cultural Intelligence: Its Measurement and Effects on Cultural Judgment and Decision Making, Cultural Adaptation, and Task Performance, Management and Organization Review, 3: 335–371.Google Scholar

Ansah, M. O., Louw, L. & Belso-Martinez, J. (2019). The Influence of National Culture on Organizational Culture of Multinational Companies, Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.20.Google Scholar

Archer-Brown, C. J. (2012). Towards an Understanding of the Antecedents of Influence in Virtual Communities, Doctoral Thesis, School of Management, University of Bath, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38148695.pdf.Google Scholar

Archer, M., Decoteau, C., Gorski, P., et al. (2016). What Is Critical Realism? www.asatheory.org/current-newsletter-online/what-is-critical-realism.Google Scholar

Argote, L. & Todorova, G. (2007). Organisational Learning: Review and Future Directions, International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 2007: 193–234.Google Scholar

Argyris, C. (1976). Single Loop and Double Loop Models in Research on Decision Making, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar

Ashby, W. R. (1956/1961). An Introduction to Cybernetics, Methuen, London.Google Scholar

Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K. & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An Organizing Framework for Collective Identity: Articulation and Significance of Multidimensionality, Psychological Bulletin, 130(1): 80.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human Memory: A Proposed System and Its Control Processes, in Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Academic Press, New York (pp. 90–196).Google Scholar

Atlee, T. & Zubizarreta, R. (2003). The Tao or Democracy: Using Co-intelligence to Create a World That Works for Us All, The Writers Collective, Cranston, RI.Google Scholar

Austin, T. L. (2005). A Comparison of the Cognitive Development of Outcome Based Versus non Outcome Based Education: An Exploration of South African Learners, Doctoral Thesis, Rand Afrikaans University, South Africa; see also http://etd.uj.ac.za/theses/available/etd-05232006-145736/restricted/Thesis.pdf.Google Scholar

Aviram, R. B., Brodsky, B. S. & Stanley, B. (2006). Borderline Personality Disorder, Stigma, and Treatment Implications, Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 14(5): 249–256.Google Scholar

Azcarate, C. A. (1999). Psychosocial Dynamics of the Armed Conflict in Colombia, Online Journal of Peace and Conflict Resolution 2(1), www.trinstitute.org/ojpcr/2_1columbia.htm.Google Scholar

Aveleira, A. (2004). Consciousness and Reality: A Stable-Dynamic Model Based on Jungian Psychology, Metareligion, www.meta-religion.com/Psychiatry/Analytical_psychology/consciousness_and_reality.htm.Google Scholar

Baba, Y. (1989). The Dynamics of Continuous Innovation in Scale‐Intensive Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 89–100.Google Scholar

Babin, B. J. & Attaway, J. S. (2000). Atmospheric Affect as a Tool for Creating Value and Gaining Share of Customer, Journal of Business Research, 49: 91–99.Google Scholar

Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 496–515.Google Scholar

Baccus, J. R. & Horowitz, M. J. (2005). Role-Relationship Models: Addressing Maladaptive Interpersonal Patterns and Emotional Distress, in Baldwin, M. W. (Ed.), Interpersonal Cognition, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 334–358).Google Scholar

Bailey, A. A. (1998). Esoteric Psychology: Treatise on the Seven Rays, Vol. II, Lucas Trust; originally published in 1942, www.bailey.it/testi-inglese/Esoteric-Psychology-a-Treatise-on-the-Seven-Rays-Vol-2.pdf.Google Scholar

Baker, A. (2004). Simplicity, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/.Google Scholar

Balick, A. (2014). The Psychodynamics of Social Networking: Connected-Up Instantaneous Culture, Karnac, London.Google Scholar

Ball, P. (2003). The Physical Modelling of Human Social Systems, Complexus, 1(4): 190–206.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change, Psychological Review, 84(2): 191–215.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1978). The Self-System in Reciprocal Determinism, American Psychologist, 33: 344–358.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1988). Organisational Application of Social Cognitive Theory, Australian Journal of Management, 13(2): 275–302.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1991). Self-Regulation of Motivation through Anticipatory and Self-Reactive Mechanisms, Perspectives on Motivation: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38: 69–164.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy, Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4: 71–81; see www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1999). A Social Cognitive Theory of Personality, in Pervin, L. & John, O. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality (2nd ed.), Guilford, New York. Reprinted in Cervone, D. & Shoda, Y. (Eds.), The Coherence of Personality, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 154–196).Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1999a). Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bandura, A. (1999b). Social Cognitive Theory of Personality, in Cervone, D. & Shoda, Y. (Eds.), The Coherence of Personality: Social-Cognitive Bases of Consistency, Variability, and Organization, Guilford, New York (pp. 185–241).Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review Psychology, 52: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bandura, A. (2003). On the Psychosocial Impact and Mechanisms of Spiritual Modeling, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 13(3): 167–173.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2005). Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales, in Pajares, F. & Urdan, T. (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, Information Age, Greenwich, CT (pp. 1–43).Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency, Association for Psychological Science, 1(2): 164–180.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2008). Toward an Agentic Theory of the Self, in Self-Processes, Learning, and Enabling Human Potential, Information Age, Greenwich, CT (pp. 15–49).Google Scholar

Barley, S. R. (2007). ‘Corporations, Democracy, and the Public Good’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(3): 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J. (1982). Intelligence and Personality, in Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barr, C. (2019). Theresa May’s Rhetoric Can Be as Populist as Trump’s, The Guardian, 6 March, www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/06/theresa-may-british-prime-minister-populism-rhetoric-is-as-rife-as-in-donald-trump-speeches.Google Scholar

Barrett, P. & Kline, P. (1982). An Item and Radial Parcel Factor Analysis of the 16 PF Questionnaire, Personality and Individual Differences, 3: 259–270.Google Scholar

Bates, J. E., Goodnight, J. A. & Fite, J. E. (2008). Temperament and Emotion, in Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M. & Feldman Barrett, L. (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 485–496).Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJ.Google Scholar

Batten, D., Salthe, S. & Boschetti, F. (2008). Visions of Evolution: Self-Organization Proposes What Natural Selection Disposes, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d7d7/a8304591d75e0d311f89837e109f9c30bf21.pdf.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid Fear, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2008). Liquid Fear. Paper presented at the World Social Summit, Rome. www2.worldsocialsummit.org.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 117(3): 497–529.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. & Twenge, J. M. (2003). The Social Self (Chapter 14), in Millon, T., Lerner, M. J. & Weiner, I. B. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and Social Psychology, John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (pp. 327–352).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumert, A, Schmitt, M, Perugini, M, et al. (2017). Integrating Personality Structure, Personality Process, and Personality Development, European Journal of Personality, 31(5): 503–528.Google Scholar

Beahrs, J. O. (1994). Dissociative Identity Disorder: Adaptive Deception of Self and Others, Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22(2): 223–237.Google Scholar

Beardsley, T. (1993). Never Give a Sucker an Even Break, Scientific American, 269: 22.Google Scholar

Bedford, O. & Hwang, K. K. (2003). Guilt and Shame in Chinese Culture: A Cross‐Cultural Framework from the Perspective of Morality and Identity, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(2): 127–144.Google Scholar

Beer, S. (1966). Decision and Control, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar

Beer, S. (1959). Cybernetics and Management, English University Press, London.Google Scholar

Beer, S. (1972), The Brain of the Firm, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar

Beer, S. (1979). The Heart of the Enterprise, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar

Beer, S. (1989). The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology, Journal of Operational Research Society, 35: 7–26.Google Scholar

Beer, S. (1994). Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrity, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar

Beer, S. (2002). What Is Cybernetics? Kybernetes, 31(2): 209–219.Google Scholar

Bellinger, G. (1996). Knowledge Management – Emerging Perspectives, www.outsights.com/systems/kmgmt/kmgmt.htm; see also www.systems-thinking.org/kmgmt/kmgmt.htm.Google Scholar

Bennett, E. M., Alpert, R. & Goldstein, A. C. (1954). Communications through Limited-Response Questioning, Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3): 303–308.Google Scholar

Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Berens, L. V. (2013). Essential Qualities of the Personality Patterns, www.bestfittype.com/Articles/essential_qualities_of_the_personality_patterns.cfm.Google Scholar

Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality, Penguin, Middlesex, UK; see also Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Knowledge: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Open Road Media, Soho, NY.Google Scholar

Berkman, E. T., Livingston, J. L. & Kahn, L. E. (2017). Finding the ‘Self’ in Self-Regulation: The Identity-Value Model, Psychological Inquiry, 28(2–3): 77–98.Google Scholar

Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Rowman Altamira, Plymouth, UK.Google Scholar

Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Power, S., Young, M. & Bujaki, M. (1989). Acculturation Attitudes in Plural Societies, Applied Psychology, 38(2): 185–206.Google Scholar

Bertalanffy, L.. (1951). General Systems Theory: A New Approach to the Unity of Science, Human Biology, 23: 302–361.Google Scholar

Bessant, J. & Tid, J. (2019). Hundreds of Incremental Changes – A Case Study on Dyson, The Innovation Portal, www.innovation-portal.info/wp-content/uploads/Dyson-Case-Study.pdf.Google Scholar

Beugré, C. D. (2007). A Cultural Perspective of Organizational Justice, IAP, Charlot, NP.Google Scholar

Beuke, C. J., Freeman, D. & Eang, S. P. (2006). Reliability and Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® Form M When Translated into Traditional and Simplified Chinese Characters, Psychological Type and Culture, paper presented at East & West: A Multicultural Research Conference, Honolulu, HI, 6–8 January.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy, Verso, London.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science, Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Bierstedt, R. (1981). American Sociological Theory: A Critical History, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Biggiero, L. (2007). Organizations as Cognitive Systems: What Do They Process and Deliver? Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper 3137, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/3137/.Google Scholar

Birkimer, J. C. & Brown, J. H. (1979). Back to Basics: Percentage Agreement Measures Are Adequate, but There Are Easier Ways, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(4): 535–543.Google Scholar

Birns, B. (1972/1973). Piaget and Wallon: Two Giants of Unequal Visibility, International Journal of Mental Health, 1(4): 24.Google Scholar

Bitbol, M. & Luisi, P. L. (2004). Autopoiesis with or without Cognition: Defining Life at Its Edge, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 1: 99–107, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2004.0012.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R. (1996). Psychopathy, Delinquency and Crime, in Gale, A. & Edwards, J. A. (Eds.), Physiological Correlates of Human Behaviour: Vol. 3. Individual Differences and Psychopathology, Academic Press, Orlando, FL (pp. 187–205).Google Scholar

Blum, B. (2016). The Psychopathology of Donald Trump, Truthdig, 31 July, www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_psychopathology_of_donald_trump_20160731/.Google Scholar

Blutner, R. & Hochnadel, E. (2010). Two Qubits for C. G. Jung’s Theory of Personality, Cognitive Systems Research, 11(3): 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N. & Hugenberg, K. (2003). Social Cognition, in Millon, T. & Lerner, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook on Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 5, John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (pp. 257–282).Google Scholar

Boeree, C. G. (2006). Personality Theories, http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/persintro.html.Google Scholar

Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research, Sage, London; see also http://cbae.nmsu.edu/dboje/papers/narrative_methods_intro.htm.Google Scholar

Boje, D. M. (2002). Enron Metatheatre: A Critical Dramaturgy Analysis of Enron’s Quasi-Objects, paper presented at Networks, Quasi-Objects, and Identity: Reintegrating Humans, Technology, and Nature session of Denver Academy of Management Meetings, 13 August, http://business.nmsu.edu/~dboje/papers/enron_theatre_LJM.htm.Google Scholar

Boje, D. M. (2004). Welcome to Mindscapes, https://davidboje.com/mindscape/.Google Scholar

Boje, D. M. (2011). Storytelling and the Future of Organizations: An Antenarrative Handbook, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Boje, D. M. (2012). What Does Quantum Physics of Story Telling Mean for Change Management? Journal of Change Management, 12(3): 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, S. C. (2005). Emotion Management in the Workplace, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar

Bos, A. E. & Ellemers, N. (2006). Cutting a Diamond out of Stone: Psychological Perspectives on Changing Self and Identity, Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 62: 6–8.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Language and Symbolic Power, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Sadness and Depression, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Böhme, G. (1977). Cognitive Norms, Knowledge Interests and the Constitution of the Scientific Object, in Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. & Whitely, R. D. (Eds.), The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, Yearbook, New York (pp. 129–139).Google Scholar

Bradley, D. (2018). Philosophers Should Prefer Simpler Theories, Philosophical Studies, 175: 3049–3067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0994-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and Motivation, Handbook of Psychophysiology, 2: 602–642.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Coping with Threatened Identities, Methuen, London.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (1988). Strategies Adopted When Identity Is Threatened, Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1(2): 189–203.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. W. & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (1991). The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17: 475–482.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. & Gardner, W. (1996). Who Is This ‘We’? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1): 83–93.Google Scholar

Bridges, W. (1992). The Character of Organizations: Using Jungian Type in Organizational Development, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Briggs Myers, I. (1998). Introduction to Type: A Guide to Understanding Your Results on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Briggs Myers, I. (2000). An Introduction to Types: A Guide to Understanding Your Results on the Myers-Briggs Types Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Britton, G. (2015). Complexity, Institutions and Agency: Towards a Framework, paper submitted to panel J107 Complexity Theory in Public Administration: Theory and Practice, 19th annual conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, 30 March–1 April, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar

Brosch, T., Coppin, G., Scherer, K. R., Schwartz, S. & Sander, D. (2011). Generating Value(S): Psychological Value Hierarchies Reflect Context-Dependent Sensitivity of the Reward System, Social Neuroscience, 6(2): 198–208.Google Scholar

Brown, A. D. (2015). Identities and Identity Work in Organizations, International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1): 20–40.Google Scholar

Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M. & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific Literacy and Discursive Identity: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Science Learning, Science Education, 89(5): 779–802.Google Scholar

Brown, J. A. C. (1961). Freud and the Post-Freudians, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar

Brown, T. L. (2003). Making Truth: Metaphor in Science, University of Illinois Press, Champaign; book review available at https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p880.2.Google Scholar

Brubaker, R. & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond ‘Identity’, Theory and Society, 29(1): 1–47.Google Scholar

Brugha, C. (1998). The Structure of Qualitative Decision Making, European Journal of Operational Research, 104(1): 46–62.Google Scholar

Brugha, C. M. (2001). Implications from Decision Science for the Systems Development Life Cycle in Information Systems, Information Systems Frontiers, 3(1): 91–105.Google Scholar

Brugha, C. M. (2002). Understanding the Dialectic: A Meta-Decision-Making Explanation of the Structure of Shili and Renli, paper presented at MCS’202 International Workshop on Metasynthesis and Complex Systems, 7–8 August, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar

Brugha, C. M. (2006). Personal communication.Google Scholar

Buck, R. (1990). Mood and Emotion: A Comparison of Five Contemporary Views, Psychological Inquiry, 1(4): 330–336.Google Scholar

Bunge, M. (1962). The Complexity of Simplicity, Journal of Philosophy, 59(5): 113–135.Google Scholar

Burke, W. W. (2002). Organization Change: Theory and Practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar

Burkitt, I. (2011). Identity Construction in Sociohistorical Context, in Schwartz, S. J., Luyckx, K. & Vignoles, V. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, Volume 1: Structures and Processes, Springer, New York (pp. 267–284).Google Scholar

Burnes, B. (1992). Managing Change, Pitman, London.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, J. R. & Bruza, P. D. (2014). Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, J. R., Wang, Z. & Pathos, E. (2014). Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision, in Busemeyer, J., Wang, Z., Townsend, A. & Eidels, A. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology, Oxford University Press, Oxford (pp. 368–399).Google Scholar

Butler, L. (2013). The Resilience of Property, Arizona Law Review, 55: 847–908.Google Scholar

Byrne, D. (2009). Working within a Complexity Frame of Reference – the Potential of ‘Integrated Methods’ for Understanding Transformation in Complex Social Systems, Communication for Social Change (CFSC) Consortium’s paper for UNAIDS on expanding the monitoring and evaluation of Social Change Communication for HIV/AIDS prevention, www.researchgate.net/publication/238100800_Working_within_a_complexity_ frame_of_reference_-_the_potential_of_%27integrated_methods%27_for_understanding_transformation_in_complex_social_systems.Google Scholar

Caley, M. & Sawada, D. (2000). Mindscapes, Creativity and Ecosophy, Trumpeter, 16(1), http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/147/174.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. (2017). Theresa May’s Election Campaign Was Incompetent and She’s Very Wrong to Blame Her Advisors, The Mirror, 10 June, www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/theresa-mays-election-campaign-incompetent-10602427.Google Scholar

Canibano, L., García-Ayuso, M., Paloma Sánchez, M. & Ole, M. (1999). Measuring Intangibles to Understand and Improve Innovation Management: Preliminary Results, paper presented at the OECD International Symposium: Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experience, Issues, and Prospects, Amsterdam, www.oecd.org/sti/ind/1947863.pdf.Google Scholar

Capra, F. (1982). Turning Point: A Science of Living Systems, Bantam Books, New York, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2b26/6aa324e7bffbdccc92fd351b19c6ceefbacf.pdf.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V. (1996). Structures and Processes in Personality Psychology, European Psychologist, 1: 14–26.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M. & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and Politics: Values, Traits, and Political Choice, Political Psychology, 27(1): 1–28.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V. & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Personalizing Politics: A Congruency Model of Political Preference, American Psychologist, 59(7): 581–594.Google Scholar

Caputo, F. & Walletzký, L. (2017). Investigating the Users’ Approach to ICT Platforms in the City Management, Systems, 5(1): 1, https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010001.Google Scholar

Carayannis, E. G. (2004). Measuring Intangibles: Managing Intangibles for Tangible Outcomes in Research and Innovation, International Journal of Nuclear Knowledge Management, 1(1–2): 49–67, www.researchgate.net/publication/228686322_Measuring_intangibles_Managing_intangibles_for_tangible_outcomes_in_research_and_innovation.Google Scholar

Carlsson, C. & Fullér, R. (2013). Possibility for Decision: A Possibilistic Approach to Real Life Decisions, Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Carmichael, T. & Hadzikadic, M. (2013). Emergent Features in a General Food Web Simulation: Lotka-Volterra, Gause’s Law, and the Paradox of Enrichment, Advances in Complex Systems, 16(8): 1–24, www.researchgate.net/publication/235435694_Emergent_features_in_a_general_food_web_simulation_Lotka-Volterra_Gause%27s_law_and_the_paradox_of_enrichment.Google Scholar

Caroll, R. T. (2003). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Skeptics Dictionary, http://skepdic.com/myersb.html.Google Scholar

Carroll, T. D. (2008). The Traditions of Fideism, Religious Studies, 44(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S. (2005). Impulse and Constraint: Perspectives from Personality Psychology, Convergence with Theory in Other Areas, and Potential for Integration, Personal Social Psychology Review, 9(4): 312–333.Google Scholar

Cattel, R. B. (1945). The Description of Personality: Principles and Findings in a Factor Analysis, American Journal of Psychology, 58: 59–90.Google Scholar

Cervone, D. (1997). Social-Cognitive Mechanisms and Personality Coherence: Self-Knowledge, Situational Beliefs, and Cross-Situational Coherence in Perceived Self-Efficacy, Psychological Science, 8: 43–50.Google Scholar

Cervone, D. (1999). Bottom-Up Explanation in Personality Psychology: The Case of Cross-Situational Coherence, in Cervone, D. & Shoda, Y. (Eds.), The Coherence of Personality: Social-Cognitive Bases of Consistency, Variability, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 303–341).Google Scholar

Cervone, D., Mor, N., Orom, H., Shadel, W. G. & Scott, W. D. (2004). Self-Efficacy Beliefs and the Architecture of Personality, in Baumeister, R. F. & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 188–210).Google Scholar

Cervone, D., Shadel, W. G. & Jencius, S. (2001). Social-Cognitive Theory of Personality Assessment, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1): 33–51.Google Scholar

CG. (2017). Theresa May Celebrity Profile, www.celebrities-galore.com/celebrities/theresa-may/home/.Google Scholar

Chan, D. (2004). Psychohistory, https://fusionanomaly.net/psychohistory.html.Google Scholar

Chang, Y. F. (2013). Social Physics, Basic Laws in Social Complex Systems and Nonlinear Whole Sociology, International Journal of Modern Social Sciences, 2(1): 20–33.Google Scholar

Chang-Schneider, C. & Swann, W. B. (2010). The Role of Uncertainty in Self-Evaluative Processes: Another Look at the Cognitive-Affective Crossfire, in Arkin, R. M., Olson, K. C. & Carroll, P. J., Handbook of the Uncertain Self, Psychology Press, Hove, UK (chapter 12).Google Scholar

Changuan (2020). China’s ‘Wolf Warrior’ Diplomacy Gamble, The Economist, 28 May, www.economist.com/china/2020/05/28/chinas-wolf-warrior-diplomacy-gamble.Google Scholar

Chapman, P., Evans, J., Crundall, D. & Underwood, G. (2000). Anger and Aggression in Driving and Non‐driving Contexts, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Traffic and Transport Psychology, Berne, Switzerland (pp. 4–7).Google Scholar

Chapra, S. C. (2012). Applied Numerical Methods with MATLAB for Engineers and Scientists, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Chittaro, L. & Serra, M. (2004). Behavioral Programming of Autonomous Characters based on Probabilistic Automata and Personality, Journal of Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 15(3/4): 319–326.Google Scholar

Chavez, S. B., Alvarado, L. A. & Gonzalez, R. (2016). Relationship between Temperament and Character Traits, Mood, and Medications in Bipolar I Disorder, Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, 18(3), https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.15br01908.Google Scholar

Christie, P. & Sidhu, R. (2018). Governmentality and ‘Fearless Speech’: Framing the Education of Asylum Seeker and Refugee Children in Australia, in Ball, (Ed.), Foucault and Education Theory: Putting Theory to Work, Routledge, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. S. & Churchland, P. M. (2013). What Are Beliefs? in Krueger, F. & Grafman, J. (Eds.), Neural Basis of Human Belief Systems, Psychology Press, New York (pp. 1–18).Google Scholar

Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked Problems, Management Science, 14(4): B-141–B-146. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.14.4.B141.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6): 1015–1026.Google Scholar

Çiftçioglu, N., Kuronen, I., Åkerman, K., Hiltunen, E., Laukkanen, J. & Kajander, E. O. (1997). A New Potential Threat in Antigen and Antibody Products: Nanobacteria, in Brown, F., Burton, D., Doherty, P., Mekalanos, J. & Norrby, E. (Eds.), Vaccines 97, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (pp. 99–103), www.nanobac.com/Klin%20lab/abstract27.htm.Google Scholar

Çiftçioglu, N., Pelttari, A. & Kajander, E. O. (1997a). Extraordinary Growth Phases of Nanobacteria Isolated from Mammalian Blood, Proceedings of SPIE, 3111: 429–435, www.nanobac.com/Klin%20lab/Abs_mammalian_blood.pdf.Google Scholar

Clark, A., Colton, S., Crook, P., Ireland, A., Pease, A. & Smaill, A. (2008). A Cognitive Model of Axiom Formulation and Reformulation with Application to AI and Software Engineering, application to ESRC for a Research Award, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.397.704&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar

Claver, E., Llopis, J., Gascó, J. L., Molina, H. & Conca, F. J. (1999). Public Administration: From Bureaucratic Culture to Citizen-Oriented Culture, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(5): 455, 464.Google Scholar

Cliffe, M. J. (1984). The Contribution of Cybernetics to the Science of Psychopathology, Kybernetes, 13: 93–98.Google Scholar

Cobb-Clark, D. A. & Schurer, S. (2012). The Stability of Big-Five Personality Traits, Economics Letters, 115(1): 11–15.Google Scholar

Cocoris, J. T. (1988/2008/2012). 15 Temperament Blends, http://fourtemperaments.com/15-temperament-blends/.Google Scholar

Coetzee, M. (2005). The Relationship between Personality Preferences, Self-Esteem and Emotional Competence, PhD Thesis, Industrial and Organisational Psychology, University of South Africa; see also http://etd.unisa.ac.za/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-08162005–151234/unrestricted/03chapter2.pdf.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. J. (1989). Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. & Stewart, I. (1995). The Collapse of Chaos, Viking, London.Google Scholar

Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E. & Phillips, S. M. (1996). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement, Mayfield, Houston, TX.Google Scholar

Cole Wright, J. L. (2005). The Role of Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment: A Review, paper submitted as part of the doctoral studies comprehensive exam, Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, http://uwstudentfpweb.uwyo.edu/n/narvik/psychology/The%20Role%20of%20Reasoning%20and%20Intuition%20in%20Moral%20Judgments,%20Submitted%20Draft.doc.Google Scholar

Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order, Scribner’s, New York.Google Scholar

Cooper, C. L., Cartwright, S. & Earley, P. C. (2003). The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar

Cornelisson, J. P., Oswick, C., Christensen, L. T. & Phillips, N. (2008). Metaphor in Organisational Research: Context, Modalities and Implications for Research Introduction, Organisationa Studies, 29(7): 7–22.Google Scholar

Conte, E., Khrennikov, A. Y., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Mendolicchio, L. & Zbilut, J. P. (2009). Mental States Follow Quantum Mechanics during Perception and Cognition of Ambiguous Figures, Open Systems & Information Dynamics, 16(1): 85–100.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual Supplement, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R: Professional Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.Google Scholar

Costa-Lima, L. (1988). Erich Auerbach: History and Metahistory, New Literary History, 19(3): 467–499.Google Scholar

Coveney, J. (1998). The Government and Ethics of Health Promotion: The Importance of Michel Foucault, Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 13(3): 459–468; see also http://her.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/13/3/459.pdf.Google Scholar

Cowings, J. S. (2002). Strategic Leadership and Decision Making, National Defense University, www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/strat-ldr-dm/cont.html.Google Scholar

Crisp, R. J. & Turner, R. N. (2010). Essential Social Psychology, Sage, London.Google Scholar

Crocker, J. & Major, B. (1989). Social Stigma and Self-Esteem: The Self-Protective Properties of Stigma, Psychological Review, 96: 608–630.Google Scholar

Crocker, J. & Quinn, D. M. (2001). Psychological Consequences of Devalued Identities, Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes, 4: 238–257.Google Scholar

Cunningham, L. (2013). Myers-Briggs Personality Test Embraced by Employers, Not All Psychologists, The Seattle Times, 13 April, www.seattletimes.com/business/myers-briggs-personality-test-embraced-by-employers-not-all-psychologists/.Google Scholar

Cupchik, G. (2001). Constructivist Realism: An Ontology That Encompasses Positivist and Constructivist Approaches to the Social Sciences, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1): Article 7, http://nbnresolving. de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs010177.Google Scholar

Damoiseaux, J. S., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M. & Beckmann, C. F. (2006). Consistent Resting State Networks across Healthy Subjects, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 103: 13848–13853.Google Scholar

Dauber, D. (2011). Hybridization in Mergers and Acquisitions, Doctoral Thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria.Google Scholar

Dauber, D., Fink, G. & Yolles, M. I. (2012). A Configuration Model of Organizational Culture, SAGE Open, 2(1): 1–16, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/2/1/2158244012441482.full.Google Scholar

Davenport, B., Shuler, S. & Whiiten, P. A. (1997). Making Sense out of Creativity and Constraints, in Davenport Sypher, B. D. (Ed.), Case Studies in Organisational Communication 2: Perspectives on Contemporary American Work Life, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 11–31).Google Scholar

Davis, A. K. (1963). Lessons from Sorokin, in Tiryakian, E. A. (Ed.), Sociological Theory, Values, and Socio-cultural Change, Free Press, New York (pp. 1–7).Google Scholar

Davis, D. N. (2000). Minds Have Personalities – Emotion Is the Core, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.124.419.Google Scholar

Davis, N. (2003). The Next Stage: Society after Capitalism, www.after-capitalism.com/society-after-capitalism/NextStage.pdf.Google Scholar

Davis, J., Marciano, A. & Runde, J. (2004). The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, Edward Elgar, London.Google Scholar

Davis, L. J. (2006). The End of Identity Politics: On Disability as an Unstable Category, in Davis, L. J. (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader, Routledge, New York (pp. 231–242).Google Scholar

De Anca, C. (2012). Beyond Tribalism: Managing Identities in a Diverse World, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

De Fruyt, F., Van De Wiele, L. & Van Heeringen, C. (2000). Cloninger’s Psychobiological Model of Temperament and Character and the Five-Factor Model of Personality, Personality and Individual Differences, 29(3): 441–452.Google Scholar

Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S. & Brown, C. (2011). The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability, Sustainable Development, 19(5): 289–300.Google Scholar

De Oliveira, A. C. M, Croson, R. T. A. & Eckel, C. (2008). Are Preferences Stable across Domains? An Experimental Investigation of Social Preferences in the Field, Center for Behavioural and Experimental Economic Science (CBEES) Working Paper 2008–3, www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2009/retrieve.php?.Google Scholar

De Pascale, A. (2014). New Epistemological Foundations for Cultural Psychology: From an Atomistic to a Self-Organizing View of Living Systems, Ann Ist Super Sanità, 50(3): 268–277.Google Scholar

De Rivera, J. H. (1977). A Structural Theory of the Emotions, International, New York.Google Scholar

De Rivera, J. (1992). Emotional Climate: Social Structure and Emotional Dynamics, International Review of Studies on Emotion, 2: 197–218.Google Scholar

De Rivera, J. H. & Grinkis, C. (1986). Emotions as Social Relationships, Motivation and Emotion, 10(4): 351–369.Google Scholar

De Rivera Clark, J., Páez, D. & Herriko, E. (2007). Emotional Climate, Human Security, and Cultures of Peace, Journal of Social Issues, 63(2): 233–253.Google Scholar

DeWeese-Boyd, M. & Young, D. (2016). Self-Deception, in Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-deception/.Google Scholar

Degges-White, S. (2017). Physical Safety or Emotional Security? Psychology Today, www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/lifetime-connections/201706/physical-safety-or-emotional-security.Google Scholar

DeMause, L. (2005). The Childhood Origins of the Holocaust, Journal of Psychohistory, 33(3): 204–222.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A., Doise, W. & Van Lieshout, C. F. M. (1998). Life-span Developmental Psychology, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Dempster, B. (1999). Post-normal Science: Considerations from a Poietic Systems Perspective, School of Planning, University of Waterloo, www.fes.uwaterloo.ca/u/mbldemps/pubs/futures1999/index.html.Google Scholar

Depue, R. & Morrone-Strupinsky, J. (2005). A Neurobehavioral Model of Affiliative Bonding: Implications for Conceptualizing a Human Trait of Affiliation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28: 313–395.Google Scholar

Desmet, P. M. A., Vastenburg, M. H., Van Bel, D. & Romero, N. (2012). Pick-a-Mood: Development and Application of a Pictorial Mood-Reporting Instrument, paper presented at the 8th International Design and Emotion Conference, London, 11–14 September.Google Scholar

Desrochers, S., Andreassi, J. K. & Thompson, C. A. (2002). Identity Theory, WCOB Faculty Publication 255, http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/wcob_fac/255.Google Scholar

DeVries, R. (1997). Piaget’s Social Theory, Educational Researcher, 26(2): 4–17.Google Scholar

Di Fatta, D., Musotto, R., D’Aleo, V., Vesperi, W., Morabito, G. & Bue, S. L. (2016). Weak Ties and Value of a Network in the New Internet Economy, in Social Media Data Extraction and Content Analysis, Section 3, IGI Global, Kansas State University (pp. 66–77).Google Scholar

Di Fatta, D. & Musotto, R. (2017). Content and Sentiment Analysis on the Online Social Networks (OSNs), in Data Analytics in Digital Humanities, Springer, New York (pp. 121–133).Google Scholar

Di Fatta, D. & Yolles, M. (2018). Modelling Multiples Identity Types through Agency: Part 3 – Mindsets and the Trump Election, Kybernetes, 46(6): 638–655.Google Scholar

Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-Order Factors of the Big Five, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73: 1246–1256.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P (1997). Culture and Cognition, Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 263–287.Google Scholar

Doce, T., Dias, J., Prada, R. & Paiva, A. (2010). Creating Individual Agents through Personality Traits, in Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C. & Safonova, A. (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6356, Springer, Berlin (pp. 257–264).Google Scholar

Dockens III, W. S., (1996). The Demotion of Alpha-Homo sapiens: Consciousness, Punctuated Equilibrium, and the Laws of the Game, in Holfkircner, W. (Ed.), The Quest for a Unified Theory of Information: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science, Gordon and Breach, Amsteldijk, Netherlands (pp. 425–442).Google Scholar

Dockens III, W. S., (1997). The Demotion of Alpha-Homo sapiens: Consciousness, Punctuated Equilibrium, and the Laws of the Game, Journal of New Paradigm Research, 50(1–4): 47–65.Google Scholar

Dockens III, W. S., (2004). The Shanghai Mirror: The Mathematical Psychology of Integration, Mindscapes and Synchronicity-2, paper presented at the 48th Annual Conference of International Society for the Systems Sciences, Asilomar.Google Scholar

Dockens III, W. S., (2007). Personal communication.Google Scholar

Dockens III, W. S., (2008). The Purse and the Butterfly: A Mathematical Psychology Approach to the Genome in the New Reality, Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 5(1): 67–102, https://doi.org/10.1386/jots.5.1.67/1.Google Scholar

Dockens III, W. S., (2008a). Mindscapes, Ontology and Corporate Culture Transition: Morphogenesis as ‘Personal Ontology’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Dockens III, W. S., (2017). Personal communication.Google Scholar

Dockens III, W. S., (2009). Mindscapes, Ontology and Global Culture Transition: Morphogenesis as the Pattern That Connects, Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 6(3): 243–264.Google Scholar

Dooley, K. L. (1997). A Complex Adaptive Systems Model of Organization Change, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 1(1): 69–97.Google Scholar

Dopfer, K. (2006).The Origins of Meso Economics: Schumpeter’s Legacy, Max Planck Inst. of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group, www.econbiz.de/archiv1/2009/92461_origins_meso_economics.pdf.Google Scholar

Dopfer, K. (2011). Mesoeconomics: A Unified Approach to Systems Complexity and Evolution, in Antonelli, C. (Ed.), Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, Edward Elgar, Boston (pp. 341–346).Google Scholar

Dopfer, K., Foster, J. & Potts, J. (2004). Micro–meso–macro, Journal of Evolutionat Economics, 14: 263–279.Google Scholar

Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Esses, V. M. & Brewer, M. B. (2003). Social Conflict, Harmony, and Integration, in Millon, T. & Lerner, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook on Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 5, John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (pp. 485–506).Google Scholar

Doyle, R. O. (1968). Ilya Prigogine, The Information Philosopher, www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/prigogine/.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., Buboltz, C., Holmes, J., et al. (2003). Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects, paper presented at Political Methodology, University of Minnesota, 17–19 July, www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Druckman/publication/228708553_Political_preference_formation_Competition_deliberation_and_the_ir_relevance_of_framing_effects/.Google Scholar

Du, R., Ai, S. & Brugha, C. M. (2011). Integrating Taoist Yin-Yang Thinking with Western Nomology: A Moderating Model of Trust in Conflict Management, Chinese Management Studies, 5(1): 55–67.Google Scholar

Dubois, D. M. (2001). Theory of Incursive Synchronization and Application to the Anticipation of a Chaotic Epidemic, International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, 10: 3–18.Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. & Abra, G. (2008). Observations of Dyadic Power in Interpersonal Interaction, paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, QC, 22 May, www.allacademic.com/meta/p234228_index.html.Google Scholar

Duncan, L. E. (2005). Personal Political Salience as a Self-Schema: Consequences for Political Information Processing, Political Psychology, 26(6): 965–976.Google Scholar

Duncan, L. E. & Stewart, A. J. (2007). Personal Political Salience: The Role of Personality in Collective Identity and Action, Political Psychology, 28(2): 143–164.Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. (1966). Suicide, a Study in Sociology, Free Press, New York; originally published 1897.Google Scholar

Duspara, B. & Greitemeyer, T. (2017). The Impact of Dark Tetrad Traits on Political Orientation and Extremism: An Analysis in the Course of a Presidential Election, Heliyon, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/e00425.Google Scholar

Duverger, M. (1972). The Study of Politics, Thomas Nelson, London; originally published in 1968 as Sociologie Politique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar

DW. (2017). http://malaysiandigest.com/world/676970-dw-correspondent-freed-in-burundi.html.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development, Psychology Press, New York; see also Editorial, ‘Unethical Amnesia’ Could Explain Some of Donald Trump’s Forgetfulness, AOL News, 10 December, www.aol.com/article/news/2016/12/10/trump-unethical-amnesia-explain-forgetfulness/21624287/.Google Scholar

Dykas, M. J. (2006). Attachment Security and the Processing of Attachment-Relevant Social Information in Late Adolescence, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar

Earley, P. C. & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions across Cultures, Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Earley, P. C. & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking Stock in Our Progress on Individualism-Collectivism: 100 Years of Solidarity and Community, Journal of Management, 24(3): 265–304.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. G. (2014). Misunderstanding Metatheorizing, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31: 720–744, https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2203.Google Scholar

Efroni, S., Harel, D. & Cohen, I. R. (2005). Reactive Animation: Realistic Modeling of Complex Dynamic Systems, Computer, 38: 38–47, https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2005.31.Google Scholar

Eidelson, R. J. (1997). Complex Adaptive Systems in the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Review of General Psychology, 1(1): 42–71.Google Scholar

Eisenburg, N. (2015). Altruistic Emotion, Cognition and Behavior, Psychology Press, Hove, UK; originally published in 1986 by Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Einwohner, R. L. (2002). Motivational Framing and Efficacy Maintenance: Animal Rights Activists’ Use of Four Fortifying Strategies, Sociological Quarterly, 43: 509–526.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. (2000). Paradox, Spirals, Ambivalence: The New Language of Change and Pluralism, Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 703–705.Google Scholar

Elkind, D. (1976). Child Development and Education: A Piagetian Perspective, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Ellis, A., Abrams, M. & Abrams, L. D. (2008). Personality Theories: Critical Perspectives, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar

Ellemers, N. (2010). Social Identity Theory, Encyclopaedia Britannica, www.britannica.com/topic/social-identity-theory.Google Scholar

Endler, N. S. & Summerfield, L. J. (1995). Intelligence, Personality, Psychopathology, and Adjustment, in Saklofske, D. H. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence, Plenum Press, New York (pp. 249–284).Google Scholar

EoM. (2016). Chaos Theory, Encyclopaedia of Management, www.encyclopedia.com/science-and-technology/mathematics/mathematics/chaos-theory.Google Scholar

Evans, A., France, R., Lano, K. & Rumpe, B. (1999). The UML as a Formal Modeling Notation, in Bezivin, J. & Muller, P.-A. (Eds.), The Unified Modeling Language, Workshop UML’98: Beyond the Notation, Springer, Berlin (LNCS 1618).Google Scholar

EWPHP. (2006). Global Strategies Project – Commentaries, Encyclopedia of World Problems and Human Potential, www.uia.be/en/node/159?kap=53.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1957). Sense and Nonsense in Psychology, Penguin Books, Harmonsworth, UK.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of Personality: 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a Taxonomic Paradigm, Personality and Individual Differences, 12: 773–790.Google Scholar

Faby, M., Gagne, F. M. & Lydon, J. E. (2004). Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4): 322–338.Google Scholar

Fang, T. (2011). Yin Yang: A New Perspective on Culture, Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 25–50.Google Scholar

Fearon, J. D. (1999). What Is Identity (as We Now Use the Word), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, https://web.stanford.edu/group/fearon-research/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/What-is-Identity-as-we-now-use-the-word-.pdf.Google Scholar

Feichtinger, C. & Fink, G. (1998). The Collective Culture Shock in Transition Countries – Theoretical and Empirical Implications, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 19(6): 302–309.Google Scholar

Feldman, S. & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism, Political Psychology, 18(4): 741–770.Google Scholar

Felthous, A. R. (1984). Psychosocial Dynamics of Child Abuse, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 29(1): 219–236.Google Scholar

Fiegenbaum, A. & Thomas, H. (1995). Strategic Groups as Reference Groups: Theory, Modeling and Empirical Examination of Industry and Competitive Strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 16(7): 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G. & O’Connor, E. J. (2009). Managing Intractable Identity Conflicts, Academy of Management Review, 34(1): 32–55.Google Scholar

Fink, G. (2019). Freedom of Science, Kybernetes, 49(7): 1935–1952. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2019-0111.Google Scholar

Fink, G., Dauber, D. & Yolles, M. (2012). Understanding Organisational Culture as a Trait Theory, European Journal of International Management, 6(2): 199–220.Google Scholar

Fink, G. & Feichtinger, C. (1998). Towards a Theory of Collective Culture Shock, Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 3(2): 1–134.Google Scholar

Fink, G. & Holden, N. (2002). Collective Culture Shock: Contrastive Reactions to Radical Systemic Change, IEF Working Paper 45, IEF, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Vienna.Google Scholar

Fink, G. & Holden, N. (2010). Resistance to the Transfer of Management Knowledge in International Ventures: Steps towards a Pathologic Interpretation, in Jan Ulijn, G. D. & Meijer, E. (Eds.), Strategic Alliances, Mergers and Acquisitions, The Influence of Culture on Successful Cooperation, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA (pp. 255–278).Google Scholar

Fink, G. & Mayrhofer, W. (2009). Cross-Cultural Competence and Management – Setting the Stage, European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 1(1): 42–65.Google Scholar

Fink, G., Neyer, A. K. & Kölling, M. (2006). Understanding Cross-Cultural Management Interaction, International Studies of Management and Organization, 36(4): 38–60.Google Scholar

Fink, G. & Yolles, M. I. (2011). Narratives, Paradigms and Change, in Boje, D. (Ed.), Storytelling and the Future of Organizations: An Antenarrative Handbook, Routledge, New York (pp. 241–252).Google Scholar

Fink, G. & Yolles, M. I. (2015). Collective Emotion Regulation in an Organisation – a Plural Agency with Cognition and Affect, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(5): 832–871.Google Scholar

Fink, G. & Yolles, M. (2016). Political Meaning of Mindset Types Created with Sagiv-Schwartz Values, European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 4(2): 87–115.Google Scholar

Fink, G. & Yolles, M. I. (2017). Collective Emotional Climate within Social Systems, paper submitted to the IACCM track at the SIETAR/IACCM conference, Dublin, 24–27 May.Google Scholar

Fiss, P. C., Marx, A. & Cambré, B. (2013). Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research: Introduction, in Fiss, P. C., Marx, A. & Cambré, B. (Eds.), Configuration Theory and Methods in Organisational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 38, Emerald, Bingley, UK (pp. 1–22).Google Scholar

Fleishman, E. A., Constanza, D. P. & Marshall-Mies, J. (1999). Abilities, in Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, R. P. & Fleishman, E. A. (Eds.), An Occupational Information System for the 21st Century: The Development of ONET, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, https://doi.org/10.1037/10313-010.Google Scholar

Flynn, B. B., Sakakibara, S., Schroeder, R. G., Bates, K. A. & Flynn, E. J. (1990). Empirical Research Methods in Operations Management, Journal of Operations Management, 9(2): 250–284.Google Scholar

Forgas, J. P. (2008). Affect and Cognition, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2): 94–101.Google Scholar

Forssell, D. (1940/2016). Perceptual Control Theory: An Overview of the Third Grand Theory in Psychology, Living Control Systems Publishing, Hayward, CA; recompiled and republished in 2016, www.livingcontrolsystems.com/download/pct_readings_ebook_2016.pdf.Google Scholar

Forter, G. (2006). Abu Ghraib, the Torture Memos, and the Psychosocial Dynamics of Torture: A Dossier, International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 3(2): 168–176.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, Pantheon Books, New York; originally published in French, 1969.Google Scholar

Fox, M. D. & Raichle, M. E. (2007). Spontaneous Fluctuations in Brain Activity Observed with Functional Resonance Imaging, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8: 700–711.Google Scholar

Francis, G. (2006). Models for Sustainability Emerge in an Open Systems Context, Integrated Assessment Journal, 6(4): 59–77.Google Scholar

Fraser-Mackenzie, P. A. F. & Dror, I. E. (2009). Selective Information Sampling: Cognitive Coherence in Evaluation of a Novel Item, Judgment and Decision Making, 4(4): 307–316.Google Scholar

Freeman, P. (2017). Meet the Trump of Ancient Rome, a Populist Demagogue Who Helped Bring Down the Republic, HuffPost, 13 April, www.huffingtonpost.com/philip-freeman/trump-rome-populist_b_9659660.html.Google Scholar

Frese, M. (2015). Cultural Practices, Norms, and Values, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10): 1327–1330.Google Scholar

Frieden, B. R. (1990). Fisher Information, Disorder, and the Equilibrium Distributions of Physics, Physical Reviews A, 41: 4265–4276.Google Scholar

Frieden, B. R. (1998). Physics from Fisher Information: A Unification, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; see also www.optics.arizona.edu/Frieden/Fisher_information.htm, and 2nd ed., Science from Fisher Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar

Frieden, B. R. (2001). Probability, Statistical Optics and Data Testing, 3rd ed., Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Frieden, R. (2004). Personal communication.Google Scholar

Frieden, R. & Gatenby, R. A. (2007). Exploratory Data Analysis Using Fisher Information, Springer, London.Google Scholar

Frieden, B. R., Plastino, A. R., Plastino, A. & Soffer, B. H. (1999). Fisher-Based Thermodynamics: Its Legendary Transform and Concavity Properties, Physical Reviews E, 60: 48–53.Google Scholar

Frieden, B. R., Plastino, A. & Soffer, B. H. (2001). Population Genetics from an Information Perspective, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208: 49–64.Google Scholar

Frieden, R., Yolles, M. I. & Kemp, G. (2005). A Metahistorical Information Theory of Social Change: The Theory, Organizational Transformation and Social Change, 2(2): 103–136.Google Scholar

Freeman, M. H. (2008). Reading Readers Reading a Poem: From Conceptual to Cognitive Integration, Cognitive Semiotics, 2: 102–128.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H. & Mesquita, B. (2000). Beliefs through Emotions, in Emotions and Beliefs: How Emotions Influence Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York (pp. 45–77).Google Scholar

Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from Freedom, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar

Fromm, E. (1961). May Man Prevail? An Inquiry into the Facts and Fictions of Foreign Policy, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar

Fromm, E. (1955). The Sane Society, Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Fu, X. J. & Li, S. P. (2005). Multi-ontology Based Systems for Distributed Configurations, in Shen, W. M., Lin, Z. K., Barthès, J. P. A. & Li, T. Q. (Eds.), Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design I (8th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling, CSCWD, Xiamen, China May 26–28,2004), Springer, Berlin (pp. 199–205).Google Scholar

Fudjack, J. (1999). The Structure of Consciousness – Liminocentricity, Enantiodromia, and Personality, The Enneagram and the MBTI e-journal, September, http://tap3x.net/EMBTI/j6structures.html.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the Post-normal Age, Futures, 25(7): 739–755.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Emergent Complex Systems, Futures, 26(6): 568–582.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. (1992). Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post Normal Science, in Krimsky, S. & Golding, D. (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions, and Fantasies, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar

Gal, S. (2002). A Semiotics of the Public/Private Distinction, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13(1): 77–95.Google Scholar

Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2002). Emergence, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 22(5): 708–727, https://doi.org/10.1080/07351692209349014.Google Scholar

Galavan, R. (2005). Exploring the Belief Systems of Senior Managers: Antecedents of Managerial Direction, Cranfield University School of Management, Cranfield, UK.Google Scholar

Galbraith, P. (2004). Organisational Leadership and Chaos Theory: Let’s Be Careful, Journal of Educational Administration, 42(1): 9–28.Google Scholar

Galtung, J. (1972). Peace: Essays in Peace Research, Vol. 1, Christian Ejlers, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Gammack, J. (2002). Mindscapes and Internet-Mediated Communication, Journal of Computer Mediated Communications, 7(3), https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/7/3/JCMC733/4584240.Google Scholar

Garcia, M. J. (2006). Social Movements: Between Resistance and Confrontation, between Private and Public, Pollis, 2(1): 329–332.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind, Paladin, London.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Garvey, J. (2016). The Persuaders: The Hidden Industry That Wants to Change Your Mind, Icon Books, London.Google Scholar

Gatenby, R. A. & Frieden, B. R. (2002). Applications of Information Theory and Extreme Physical Information to Carcinogenesis, Cancer Research, 62: 3675–3684.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The Quark and Jaguar, Little, Brown, London.Google Scholar

George, J. M. & Jones, G. R. (2002). Organizational Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar

Gergen, K. J. (1971). The Concept of Self, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar

Gibbs, J. C. (1979). Kohlberg’s Moral Stage Theory: A Piagetian Revision, Human Development, 22(2): 89–112.Google Scholar

Gibson, H. (2000). In the Image of Leibniz’s God: Of Metanarratives and Congeries, Academic Forum 2000–01/Number 18, www.hsu.edu/interior2,aspx?id=6367.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. L. (1983). From Simplicity to Complexity: The Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behavior, Political Behavior, 5(1): 7–49.Google Scholar

Gioia, D. A. & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building, Academy of Management Review, 15: 584–602.Google Scholar

Gindis, D. (2009). From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(1): 25–46.Google Scholar

Girodo, M., Deck, T. & Morrison, M. (2002). Dissociative-Type Identity Disturbances in Undercover Agents: Socio-cognitive Factors behind False-Identity Appearances and Reenactments, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30(7): 631–643.Google Scholar

Given, L. M. (2008). Critical Realism, in Sage Encyclopaedia of Qualitative Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n87.Google Scholar

Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J. & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research, The Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 874–907.Google Scholar

Gelfand, M. (2018). Here’s the Science behind the Brexit Vote and Trump’s Rise, The Guardian, 17 September, www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/17/science-behind-brexit-vote-trump.Google Scholar

Gelfand, M. J., Duan, L., Boski, P., et al. (2011). Differences between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study, Science, 332(6033): 1100–1104, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754.Google Scholar

Gelfand, J., Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S. & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement, Cross Cultural Research, 29: 240.Google Scholar

Glanville, R. (2004). The Purpose of Second-Order Cybernetics, Kybernetes, 33(9/10): 1379–1386.Google Scholar

Glassman, R. B. (1973). Persistence and Loose Coupling in Living Systems, Behavioral Science, 18(2): 83–98.Google Scholar

Glasman, M., Rutherford, J., Stears, M. & White, S. (2011). The Labour Tradition and the Politics of Paradox, Oxford London Seminars 2010–11, www.scribd.com/doc/55941677/Labour-Tradition-and-the-Politics-of-Paradox.Google Scholar

Gobé, M. (2001). Emotional Branding: The New Paradigm of Connecting Brands to People, Allworth Press, New York.Google Scholar

Godin, G. (1987). Importance of the Emotional Aspect of Attitude to Predict Intention, Psychological Reports, 61(3): 719–723, https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1987.61.3.719.Google Scholar

Godin, G., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Eccles, M. & Grimshaw, G. (2008). Healthcare Professionals’ Intentions and Behaviours: A Systematic Review Of Studies Based on Social Cognitive Theories, Implementation Science, 3: 36, https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-36.Google Scholar

Goff, L. & Smoker, P. (1996). Spirituality, Religion, Culture, and Peace: Exploring the Foundations for Inner-Outer Peace in the Twenty-First Century, International Journal of Peace Studies, 1(1): 25–36, www.gmu.edu/programs/icar/ijps/vol1_1/smoker.html.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative ‘Description of Personality’: The Big-Five Factor Structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1216–1229.Google Scholar

Golden, G. K. (2008). Emergency Measures: Crisis and Response in the Roman Republic (from the Gallic Sack to the Tumultus of 43BC), Doctoral Thesis, Graduate School–New Brunswick, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/24391/PDF/1/play/.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits, American Psychologist, 48: 26–34.Google Scholar

Golec de Zavala, A. & Cichocka, A. (2011). Collective Narcissism and Anti-Semitism in Poland, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2): 213–229.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action Phases and Mindsets, in Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentino, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 53–92).Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. & Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus Implemental Mindsets in the Control of Action, in Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-Processes Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 403–422).Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of Deliberative and Implemental Mind-sets on Illusion of Control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: 531–542.Google Scholar

Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1990). Educational Psychology: A Realistic Approach, 4th ed., Longman, White Plains, NY.Google Scholar

Goodfield, B. A. (2016). Britain’s New Prime Minister Theresa May, a Psychological Profile – What Can We Expect? http://goodfieldinstitute.com/pdfs/Profile%20of%20prime%20minister%20Theresa%20May.pdf.Google Scholar

Goorha, P. (2000). Corruption: Theory and Evidence through Economies in Transition, International Journal of Social Economics, 27(12): 1180–1204.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. L. (2003, December). The Unsustainability of Sustainability, Regulation, 26(4), http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2003/12/v26n4-review.pdf.Google Scholar

Gonsowski, J. C. (1999). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Mapping to Circumplex and Five-Factor Models, The Enneagram and the MBTI Electronic Journal, Issue 8, http://tap3x.net/EMBTI/j8gonsowski.html.Google Scholar

Gödel, K. (1931). Kurt Godel: Collected Works, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Goyal, S. (2019). Gandhi – a True Ascetic, http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16243.78889.Google Scholar

Grandey, A. A., Fisk, G. M. & Steiner, D. D. (2005). Must ‘Service with a Smile’ Be Stressful? The Moderating Role of Personal Control for American and French Employees, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5): 893–904, http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/apl/90/5/893/.Google Scholar

Grant, G. H. (2003). The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Modern Corporate America, Management Decision, 41(9): 923–934.Google Scholar

Grattan, R. (2008). Crafting Management History, Journal of Management History, 14(2): 174–183.Google Scholar

Grebogi, C., Ott, E. & Yorke, J. A. (1987). Chaos, Strange Attractors, and Fractal Basin Boundaries in Nonlinear Dynamics, Science, 238(4827): 632–638.Google Scholar

Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S. & Fiss, P. C. (2018). Studying Configurations with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Best Practices in Strategy and Organization Research, Strategic Organisation, 16(4): 482–495, https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The Totalitarian Ego: Fabrication and Revision of Personal History, American Psychologist, 35(7): 603–618.Google Scholar

Gregg, M. & Seigworth, G. J. (1961). The Affect Theory Reader, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar

Greve, H. R., Palmer, D. & Pozner, J. (2010). Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct, The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1): 53–107.Google Scholar

Gribbin, J. (2004). Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the Emergence of Life, Penguin, London.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and Response-Focused Emotion Regulation: Divergent Consequences for Experience, Expression, and Physiology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1): 224–237.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. (2008). Emotion Regulation, in Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M. & Feldman Barrett, L. (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd ed., Guilford Press, New York (pp. 497–512).Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. & John, O. P. (2003). Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85: 348–362, https://fetzer.org/sites/default/files/images/stories/pdf/selfmeasures/Self_Measures_for_Personal_Growth_and_Positive_Emotions_EMOTION_REGULATION.pdf.Google Scholar

Gross, R. & Kinnison, N. (2007). Psychology for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals: Applying Theory to Practice, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. & Munoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion Regulation and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2: 151–164.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. & Rayner, S. (1985). Measuring Culture: A Paradigm for the Analysis of Social Organization, Columbia Press, New York.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations, in Gross, J. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 3–24).Google Scholar

Grossman, S. (1999). C. G. Jung and National Socialism, in Bishop, P. (Ed.), Jung in Context: A Reader, Routledge, London; originally published as Grossman, S. (1979). C. G. Jung and National Socialism, Journal of European Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/004724417900903601.Google Scholar

Gruber, H. E. (1982). Piaget’s Mission, Social Research, 49(1): 239–264.Google Scholar

Guarino, N. (2012). Introduction to Applied Ontology and Ontological Analysis, paper presented at the First Interdisciplinary Summer School on Ontological Analysis, 16–20 July, Trento, Italy, https://iaoa.org/isc2012/docs/AppliedOntology_OntologicalAnalysis.pdf.Google Scholar

Guo, K. J. (2006). Strategy for Organizational Change in State-Owned Commercial Banks in China: A Developing Organizational Development View, Doctoral Thesis, Faculty of Business and Law, Liverpool John Moores University.Google Scholar

Guo, K. J., Yolles, M. I., Fink, G. & Iles, P. A. (2016). The Changing Organisation: An Agency Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J. & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in Groups: Articulating a Construct, British Journal of Social Psychology, 32: 87–106.Google Scholar

Güçlütürk, Y., Pérez, M., Güçlü, U., et al. (2016). Apparent Personality Trait Prediction with Audiovisual Deep Residual Networks, http://sergioescalera.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/corneanu.pdf.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1970). Knowledge and Interest, in Emmet, D. & MacIntyre, A. (Eds.), Sociological Theory and Philosophical Analysis, Macmillan, London (pp. 36–54).Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests, Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and Practice, Heinamann, London.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Heckert, A. & Heckert, D. M. (2004). Using an Integrated Typology of Deviance to Analyse Ten Common Norms of the U.S. Middle Class, The Sociological Quarterly, 45(2): 209–228.Google Scholar

Hamerhoff, S. R. (1994). Quantum Coherence in Microtubules: A Neural Basis for Emergent Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1: 91–118.Google Scholar

Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P., Waldman, D. & Jennings, P. L. (2013). The Neurological Basis for Leader Complexity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3): 393–411.Google Scholar

Harmon, M. H. & Mayer, R. T. (1986). Organisation Theory for Public Administration, Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar

Harris, B. (2002). Xenophobia: A New Pathology for a New South Africa, in Hook, D. & Eagle, G. (Eds.), Psychopathology and Social Prejudice, Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press (pp. 169–184).Google Scholar

Hartel, C. E. J., Zerbe, W. J. & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). Emotions in Organization Behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum, London.Google Scholar

Harvey, O. J. (1966). Experience, Structure and Adaptability, Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Harvey, R. J., Murry, W. D. & Markham, S. E. (1995). A ‘Big Five’ Scoring System for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL, May.Google Scholar

Hatch, M. J. (1993). The Dynamics of Organisational Culture, Academy of Management Review, 18(4): 657–693.Google Scholar

Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organisation Theory: Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hatch, M. J. & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organisation Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hauser, H. (1999). Visualization of Complex Dynamical Systems, Institute of Computer Graphics, www.cg.tuwien.ac.at/research/vis/dynsys/.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data, Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1): 77–89.Google Scholar

He, H. W. & Balmer, J. M. T. (2007). Identity Studies: Multiple Perspectives and Implications for Corporate-Level Marketing, European Journal of Marketing, 41(7/8): 765–787.Google Scholar

Heinström, J. (2003). Five Personality Dimensions and Their Influence on Information Behavior, Information Research, 9(1), Paper 165; see http://InformationR.net/ir/9-1/paper165.html.Google Scholar

Heise, D. R. & O’Brien, J. (1993). Emotion Expression in Groups, in Lewis, M. & Haviland, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions, Guilford Press, New York (pp. 489–497).Google Scholar

Hemaspaandra, L. A. & Ogihara, M. (2002). The Complexity Theory Companion, Springer, Berlin, http://books.google.co.th/books?id=JCwIaB8Z-wAC.Google Scholar

Hentschel, U. & Sumbadze, N. (2002). Individual Differences in Mindscapes and Attitudes, Social Behavior and Personality, 30(3): 213–222.Google Scholar

Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2009). Social Capital, Chinese Style: Individualism, Relational Collectivism and the Cultural Embeddedness of the Institutions-Performance Link, Working Paper Series 132, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, http://d-nb.info/997649216/34.Google Scholar

Hewitt, J. P. (1989). Dilemmas of the American Self, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Higgs, M. (2001). Is There a Relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Emotional Intelligence? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(7): 509–533.Google Scholar

Hijmans, E. J. S. (2003). Het dynamisch identiteitsmodel: Een synthese van benaderingen, Kwalon, 23: 114–126.Google Scholar

Hijmans, E. J. S. & Wester, F. P. J. (2009). Between Idealisation and Stigmatisation: Analytical Dimensions of the Media Image, in Konig, R. P., Nelissen, P. W. M. & Huysmans, F. J. M. (Eds.), Meaningful Media: Communication Research on the Social Construction of Reality, Tandem Felix, Ubbergen (pp. 256–272).Google Scholar

Hill, R. P. & Mazis, M. B. (1986). Measuring Emotional Responses to Advertising, in Lutz, R. J. & Provo, U. T. (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, Association for Consumer Research, London (pp. 164–169).Google Scholar

Hinkle, R. C. (1994). Developments in American Sociological Theory, 1915–1950, State University of New York Press, New York.Google Scholar

Hirshleifer, D. & Teoh, S. H. (2003). Herd Behaviour and Cascading in Capital Markets: A Review and Synthesis, European Financial Management, 9(1): 25–66.Google Scholar

Hirschman, E. C. & Stern, B. B. (1999). The Roles of Emotion in Consumer Research, Advances in Consumer Research, 26: 4–11.Google Scholar

Hitlin, S. (2003). Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links between Two Theories of Self, Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2): 118–137.Google Scholar

Ho, M. W. & Fox, S. W. (1988). Evolutionary Processes and Metaphors, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (1994). The Interpretation of Documents and Material Culture, Sage Biographical Research, 1(9): 171–188.Google Scholar

Hoeken, H. & Van Vliet, M. (2000). Suspense, Curiosity, and Surprise: How Discourse Structure Influences the Affective and Cognitive Processing of a Story, Poetics, 26: 277–286.Google Scholar

Hoffman, B. (1947). The Strange Story of the Quantum, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar

Hoffman, J. (2014). Alternative Futures of China: A Macrohistorical Approach, Futures, 57: 14–27.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1983). The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories, Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2): 75–89, www.aogaku-daku.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/culturalRelativity10.pdf.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. J., Pedersen, P. & Hofstede, G. (2002). Exploring Culture, Exercise, Stories and Synthetic Cultures, Intercultural Press, Yarmouth, ME.Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A. (2001). A Social Identity Theory of Leadership, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3): 184–200.Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J. & White, K. M. (1995). A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory, Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4): 255–269.Google Scholar

Hoise, R. (2017). The Deeper Reason Why We Should Be Worried Donald Trump Hung Up on Australia PM Malcolm Turnbull, The Independent, 2 February, www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/donald-trump-mental-health-why-worry-hung-up-australia-pm-malcolm-turnbull-psychological-world-a7559461.html.Google Scholar

Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying Complex Adaptive Systems, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 19: 1–8.Google Scholar

Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar

Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1986). Using Your Learning Styles, Peter Honey, Maidenhead, UK.Google Scholar

Hooijberg, R. & Choi, J. (2001). The Impact of Organisational Characteristics on Leadership Effectiveness Models: An Examination of Leadership in a Private and a Public Sector Organisation, Administration & Society, 33(4): 403–431.Google Scholar

Horowitz, M. J. (2012). Self-Identity Theory and Research Methods, Journal of Research Practice, 8(2): Article M14, www.researchgate.net/publication/288164512_Self-Identity_Theory_and_Research_Methods.Google Scholar

Horowitz, M. J. (1991). Person Schemas and Maladaptive Interpersonal Patterns, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Horowitz, M. J. (1998). Cognitive Psychodynamics: From Conflict to Character, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Houser, S. (1985). Harold A. Innis and Michel Foucault: A Communication Perspective on Knowledge Construction, PhD Thesis, Dept. of Communications, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277–1288.Google Scholar

Huchingson, J. E. (2001). Pandemonium Tremendum: Chaos and Mystery in the Life of God, The Pilgrim Press, Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar

Huffer, E. (2006). Regionalism and Cultural Identity: Putting the Pacific Back into the Plan, in Firth, S. (Ed.), Globalisation and Governance in the Pacific Islands: State, Society and Governance in Melanesia, ANU Press, Canberra, Australia (pp. 43–55).Google Scholar

Hunt, A. & Wheeler, B. (2017). Theresa May: 10 Reasons Why the PM Blew Her Majority, BBC News, 14 June, www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-40237833.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. D. (2002). Politics and Political Culture: The Critical Difference, www.nd.edu/isla/ISLA/webpages/thearts/sikkink/.Google Scholar

Hyldegård, J. (2009). Personality Traits and Group-Based Information Behaviour: An Exploratory Study, Information Research, 14(2): Paper 402, http://InformationR.net/ir/14-2/paper402.html.Google Scholar

Hyötyniemi, H. (2006). Neocybernetics in Biological Systems, Helsinki University of Technology, Control Engineering Laboratory, Report 151, August, http://neocybernetics.com/report151/.Google Scholar

Iles, P. & Yolles, M. I. (2002). International Joint Ventures, HRM and Viable Knowledge Migration, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(4): 624–641.Google Scholar

Iles, P. & Yolles, M. I. (2003). International HRD Alliances in Viable Knowledge Migration and Development: The Czech Academic Link Project, Human Resource Development International, 6(3): 301–324.Google Scholar