Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- PART ONE BUSINESS
- 1 Managing Conflicts of Interest within Organizations: Does Activating Social Values Change the Impact of Self-Interest on Behavior?
- 2 Commentary: On Tyler's “Managing Conflicts of Interest within Organizations”
- 3 A Review of Experimental and Archival Conflicts-of-Interest Research in Auditing
- 4 Commentary: Conflicts of Interest in Accounting
- 5 Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest
- 6 Commentary: Bounded Ethicality and Conflicts of Interest
- 7 Coming Clean but Playing Dirtier: The Shortcomings of Disclosure as a Solution to Conflicts of Interest
- 8 Commentary: Psychologically Naive Assumptions about the Perils of Conflicts of Interest
- PART TWO MEDICINE
- PART THREE LAW
- PART FOUR PUBLIC POLICY
- Index
- References
3 - A Review of Experimental and Archival Conflicts-of-Interest Research in Auditing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- PART ONE BUSINESS
- 1 Managing Conflicts of Interest within Organizations: Does Activating Social Values Change the Impact of Self-Interest on Behavior?
- 2 Commentary: On Tyler's “Managing Conflicts of Interest within Organizations”
- 3 A Review of Experimental and Archival Conflicts-of-Interest Research in Auditing
- 4 Commentary: Conflicts of Interest in Accounting
- 5 Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest
- 6 Commentary: Bounded Ethicality and Conflicts of Interest
- 7 Coming Clean but Playing Dirtier: The Shortcomings of Disclosure as a Solution to Conflicts of Interest
- 8 Commentary: Psychologically Naive Assumptions about the Perils of Conflicts of Interest
- PART TWO MEDICINE
- PART THREE LAW
- PART FOUR PUBLIC POLICY
- Index
- References
Summary
ABSTRACT
I review empirical (archival and experimental) accounting research that has addressed the issue of conflicts of interest, focusing on the audit setting that has received so much recent attention. I start with a brief discussion of the audit function and auditors' incentives, viewing auditors as weighing incentives that favor acceding to client demands against incentives that favor resisting client demands, and also as influenced by psychological and social aspects of audit settings. Then, I discuss various different research approaches to investigating conflicts of interest in this setting. The review is not intended to be exhaustive. Rather, I highlight key strengths and weaknesses of each approach and illustrate each approach with a representative study. I also discuss the main insights provided by each approach. I finish by relating the insights provided by different approaches and suggesting some directions for future research.
The general topic of conflicts of interest has been of particular recent concern in accounting and auditing. Large financial failures and accounting scandals suggest potential conflicts that have reduced the effectiveness of corporate governance, the reliability of financial statements, and ultimately investor confidence. Policy makers have responded with unusual speed by passing numerous new regulations, culminating in passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in July 2002. Yet, many of these regulatory changes have occurred without much consideration of evidence provided by the extant experimental and archival empirical research literatures.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Conflicts of InterestChallenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy, pp. 41 - 69Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1999). Audit Adjustments. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 89. New York: AICPA
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2000). Audit Committee Communications. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 90. New York: AICPA
(1982). The auditor as an economic agent. Journal of Accounting Research, 20(2): 503–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1991). Conservatism and auditor-client negotiations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29 (supplement): 31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antle, R., Gordon, E. A., Narayanamoorthy, G., and Zhou, L. (2002). The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Working paper, Yale University
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., and Beasley, M. S. (2002). Auditing and Assurance Services, An Integrated Approach. Prentice Hall
Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., and Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. Working paper, University of Wisconsin–Madison
, , and (1997). The impossibility of auditor independence. Sloan Management Review (Summer): 89–94Google Scholar
, , and (2002). Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Business Review (November): 97–102Google ScholarPubMed
, , and (1999). Perceptions of auditor independence: U.K. evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 8(1): 67–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeler, J. D., and Hunton, J. E. (2003). Contingent economic rents: Insidious threats to auditor independence. Working paper, Millsaps College
(1995). Strategic dependence and inherent risk assessments. The Accounting Review, 70(1): 71–90Google Scholar
(1996). The interdependence of reporting discretion and informational efficiency in labor markets. The Accounting Review, 71(4): 493–511Google Scholar
(2001). The disposition of audit-detected misstatements: An examination of risk and reward factors and aggregation effects. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(1): 71–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, M. B., Leone, A. J., and Willenborg, M. (2002). An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. Working paper, University of Rochester
, , and (1998). Experimental evidence of differential auditor pricing and reporting strategies. The Accounting Review 73(2): 254–275Google Scholar
, and (2003). Client importance, non-audit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78(4): 931–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1995). The ability of professional standards to mitigate aggressive reporting. The Accounting Review 70(2): 227–248Google Scholar
(1981). Auditor independence, “low balling,” and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2): 113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., and Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Working paper, University of Southern California
, and (1991). The impact of MAS on auditors independence – An experimental markets study. Journal of Accounting Research, 29: 60–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996). The effects of lowballing on audit quality: An experimental markets study. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance: 45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1994). An experimental investigation of alternative damage-sharing liability regimes with an auditing perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, 32: 103–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001). An experimental investigation of retention and rotation requirements. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1): 93–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1987). An investigation of the impact of economic and organizational factors on auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 7 (1): 1–14Google Scholar
, and (1985). Strategic considerations in auditing. The Accounting Review, 60(4): 634–650Google Scholar
, , and (2002). The relation between auditors' fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77: 71–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbins, M., and Salterio, S. (2002). Modeling the auditor's intended strategy in auditor-client negotiation. Working paper, University of Alberta and University of Waterloo
, , and (2001). Evidence about auditor-client management negotiation concerning client's financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3): 534–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1974). The auditor-firm conflict of interests: Its implications for independence. The Accounting Review, 49(4): 707–718Google Scholar
, and (1996). Auditors' incentives and their application of financial accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 71(1): 43–59Google Scholar
, and (2001). The meaning of a defined accounting concept: Regulatory changes and the effect on auditor decision making. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26 (2): 123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001). Antecedents and consequences of independence risk: Framework for analysis. Accounting Horizons, 15(1): 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29 (Autumn): 193–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadous, K., Kennedy, J., and Peecher, M. E. (2003). The effect of quality assessment and directional goal commitment on auditors' acceptance of client-preferred accounting methods. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
(1996). Reputation formation for reliable reporting: An experimental investigation. The Accounting Review, 71(3): 375–396Google Scholar
(2002). An experimental investigation of self-serving biases in an auditing trust game: The effect of group affiliation. The Accounting Review, 77 (2): 265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinney, W. R. (2000). Information Quality Assurance and Internal Control for Management Decision Making. McGraw-Hill
, and (2002). Discussion of the relation between auditors' fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77: 107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994). Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit related adjustment studies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13(1): 149–156Google Scholar
Kinney, W. R., Palmrose, Z. V., and Scholz. S. (2003). Auditor independence and non-audit services: What do restatements suggest? Working paper, University of Texas at Austin
(1990). The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3): 480–498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larcker, D. F., and Richardson, S. A. (2003). Corporate governance, fees for non-audit services and accrual choices. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania
(1980). Expert judgment in auditing: An expected utility approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 18 (2): 594–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). Does mandated audit communication reduce opportunistic corrections to manage earnings to forecasts?The Accounting Review, 75(4): 383–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1993). The review process as a control for differential recall of evidence in auditor judgments. Accounting Organizations and Society, 18(6): 559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting Organizations and Society, 27 (8): 775–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Auditor reputation building. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3): 599–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001). The effect of accounting uncertainty and auditor reputation on auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory: 49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. A., Loewenstein, G., Tanlu, L., and Bazerman. M. H. (2003). Auditor independence, conflict of interest, and the unconscious intrusion of bias. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University
Neale, M. A., and Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in negotiation. The Free Press
(2003). Behavioral evidence on the effects of principles- and rules-based standards. Accounting Horizons, 17(1): 91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Evidence from auditors about managers' and auditors' earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review, 77 (Quality of Earnings Conference Issue): 175–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2003). How are earnings managed? Examples from auditors. Accounting Horizons, 17 (Supplement): 17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). The effect of ambiguity on auditors' loss contingency reporting judgments. The Accounting Review 72 (2): 257–274Google Scholar
Nelson, M. W., Smith, S. D., and Palmrose, Z.-V. (2003). Quantitative materiality perspectives and auditors' disposition of detected misstatements. Working paper, Cornell University
, and (1976). The auditor-firm conflict: An analysis using concepts of exchange theory. The Accounting Review, 51(2): 335–346Google Scholar
Ng, T. B., and Tan, H. T. (2003). Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effectiveness on auditors' judgments in an auditor-client negotiation context. Working paper, Nanyang Technological University
(1995). The objectivity of accountants litigation support judgments. The Accounting Review, 70(3): 467–488Google Scholar
, , and (1996). The distortion of information during decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(1): 102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1998). Predecisional distortion of product information. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4): 438–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2000). Predecisional distortion of information by auditors and salespersons. Management Science, 46(1): 13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (6): 573–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994). A multi-period model and experimental evidence of independence and “lowballing.”Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (Summer): 137–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1997). The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(5): 481–505Google Scholar
(1992). Auditor independence, dismissal threats, and the market reaction to auditor switches. Journal of Accounting Research, 30(1): 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L. (2001). The mind and heart of the negotiator. Prentice Hall
(1994). The effect of partner compensation schemes and generally accepted accounting principles on audit partner judgment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13: 56–71Google Scholar
Trotman, K., Wright, A., and Wright, S. (2002). Auditor negotiations: An examination of the efficacy of intervention methods. Working paper, University of New South Wales
(2002). Predecisional distortion of evidence as a consequence of real-time audit review. The Accounting Review 77 (1): 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). The effect of industry experience on hypothesis generation and audit planning decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9: 273–294Google Scholar
- 19
- Cited by