Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T08:08:44.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Theory of constructive controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

David W. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Humans are unique as a species in being able to decide which evolutionary pathways on Earth will remain open and which will forever be closed. Human intelligence and creativity has given humanity the capacity to change the environment in which they live. This same capacity gives humanity the power to destroy the Earth. The legacy humanity has created is that if we want an animal or a plant to become extinct, we have the power to make it happen. No other creature has ever managed to do this. Even other branches of the human species did not seem to have this power. Neanderthals lived in Europe for over 100,000 years but did not significantly change the Earth's environment. Homo Sapiens, however, after having been on the Earth for only 40,000 years or so, may be creating global warming and the sixth major extinction in the history of the Earth (Kolbert, 2014).

There is a group of scientists who believe that global warming, the mass extinction of plants and animals, and other changes on the Earth have nothing to do with humans and their activities. It is a naturally occurring cycle. Other scientists believe that humans are responsible for the changes in the environment. Either way, regardless of the cause, the changes in the environment endanger the future of humanity. We should probably take action to ensure our long-term survival. It should be noted, however, that some scientists believe environmental change is too far advanced for anything to be done about it, and humanity is doomed and will become extinct regardless of what we now do.

Imagine that you are in charge of structuring a constructive controversy to determine the most appropriate course of action for humanity to take. When the “there is nothing we can do” position is taken off the table (as there is no use talking about it if the situation is hopeless), there are two (or more) alternatives left.

Type
Chapter
Information
Constructive Controversy
Theory, Research, Practice
, pp. 29 - 40
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×