Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Table of statutory instruments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Formation
- Part III Consideration and intent to create legal relations
- Part IV Third parties and assignment
- Part V Vitiating elements
- Part VI Terms and interpretation
- Part VII Breakdown and liability
- Part VIII Remedies for breach
- Part IX Illegality and public policy
- Part X The future
- Appendix: A who's who of contract law
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
Bibliography
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Table of statutory instruments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Formation
- Part III Consideration and intent to create legal relations
- Part IV Third parties and assignment
- Part V Vitiating elements
- Part VI Terms and interpretation
- Part VII Breakdown and liability
- Part VIII Remedies for breach
- Part IX Illegality and public policy
- Part X The future
- Appendix: A who's who of contract law
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contract Law , pp. 697 - 723Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston's The Law of Contract (15th edn, Oxford, 2007)
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), vol. 1
Smith and Thomas, A Casebook on Contract, ed. R. Brownsword (12th edn, London, 2009)
Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston's The Law of Contract (15th edn, Oxford, 2007)
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), vol. 1
Smith and Thomas, A Casebook on Contract, ed. R. Brownsword (12th edn, London, 2009)
Atiyah's Introduction to the Law of Contract, ed. (6th edn, Oxford, 2006)
Michigan Law Review symposium on ‘Fault in American Contract Law’ (2009) 107 Michigan Law Review 1431–1600
(ed.), Commercial Law and Commercial Practice (Oxford, 2003)
and (eds.), Commercial Remedies: Current Issues and Problems (Oxford, 2003)
and (eds.), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (Oxford, 2005)
and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008)
and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007)
and (eds.), Commercial Remedies: Current Issues and Problems (Oxford, 2003)
and (eds.), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (Oxford, 2005)
and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008)
and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007)
, ‘Ius Commune and the Principles of European Contract Law; Contemporary Revival of an Old Idea’, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 1Google Scholar
, ‘International Conventions and Commercial Law: The Pursuit of Uniformity’ (1990) 106 LQR530Google Scholar
, ‘Why Europe Needs a Civil Code’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 259Google Scholar
, Contract Code: Drawn up on Behalf of the English Law Commission (Milan, 1993) (a codification of the common law rules of contract is available at: www.difc.ae/laws- regulations/ (Dubai International Financial Centre))Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 LQR433Google Scholar
, Contract Law: Themes for the Twenty First Century (2nd edn, Oxford, 2006), chapter 5; another version of this is R. Brownsword, in M. Furmston (ed.), The Law of Contract (3rd edn, London, 2007), chapter 1Google Scholar
, ‘The Limits of Contract’, in J. W. Neyers, R. Bronaugh and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 1–24Google Scholar
, ‘Border Control: Some Comparative Remarks on the Cartography of Obligations’, in , and (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 25, at 31 ff (for a civilian perspective)Google Scholar
, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford, 1979) (surveying the entire intellectual scene)Google Scholar
, A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations (Oxford, 1999), chapters 5, 11, 12 and 13Google Scholar
, in W. Cornish, J. S. Anderson, R. Cocks, M. Lobban, P. Polden and K. Smith, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XII, 1820–1914: Private Law (Oxford, 2010), 295 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Classical Model of Contract: The Product of a Revolution in Legal Thought?’ (2010) 30 LS513Google Scholar
, ‘Contracts, Promises, and the Law of Obligations’, in , Essays on Contract (Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar
, ‘Border Control: Some Comparative Remarks on the Cartography of Obligations’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 25 ff (for a civilian perspective)Google Scholar
, ‘The Staggering March of [the Tort of] Negligence’, in and (eds.), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Oxford, 1998), 97Google Scholar
Atiyah's Introduction to the Law of Contract, ed. (6th edn, Oxford, 2006)
Michigan Law Review symposium on ‘Fault in American Contract Law’ (2009) 107 Michigan Law Review 1431–1600
, ‘Ius Commune and the Principles of European Contract Law; Contemporary Revival of an Old Idea’, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 1Google Scholar
, ‘International Conventions and Commercial Law: The Pursuit of Uniformity’ (1990) 106 LQR530Google Scholar
, ‘Why Europe Needs a Civil Code’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 259Google Scholar
, Contract Code: Drawn up on Behalf of the English Law Commission (Milan, 1993) (a codification of the common law rules of contract is available at: www.difc.ae/laws- regulations/ (Dubai International Financial Centre))Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 LQR433Google Scholar
, Contract Law: Themes for the Twenty First Century (2nd edn, Oxford, 2006), chapter 5; another version of this is R. Brownsword, in M. Furmston (ed.), The Law of Contract (3rd edn, London, 2007), chapter 1Google Scholar
, ‘The Limits of Contract’, in J. W. Neyers, R. Bronaugh and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 1–24Google Scholar
, ‘Border Control: Some Comparative Remarks on the Cartography of Obligations’, in , and (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 25, at 31 ff (for a civilian perspective)Google Scholar
, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford, 1979) (surveying the entire intellectual scene)Google Scholar
, A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations (Oxford, 1999), chapters 5, 11, 12 and 13Google Scholar
, in W. Cornish, J. S. Anderson, R. Cocks, M. Lobban, P. Polden and K. Smith, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XII, 1820–1914: Private Law (Oxford, 2010), 295 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Classical Model of Contract: The Product of a Revolution in Legal Thought?’ (2010) 30 LS513Google Scholar
, ‘Contracts, Promises, and the Law of Obligations’, in , Essays on Contract (Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar
, ‘Border Control: Some Comparative Remarks on the Cartography of Obligations’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 25 ff (for a civilian perspective)Google Scholar
, ‘The Staggering March of [the Tort of] Negligence’, in and (eds.), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Oxford, 1998), 97Google Scholar
, ‘Contracts, Promises, and the Law of Obligations’, in , Essays on Contract (Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar
, ‘Border Control: Some Comparative Remarks on the Cartography of Obligations’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 25 ff (for a civilian perspective)Google Scholar
, ‘The Staggering March of [the Tort of] Negligence’, in and (eds.), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Oxford, 1998), 97Google Scholar
Atiyah's Introduction to the Law of Contract, ed. (6th edn, Oxford, 2006)
Michigan Law Review symposium on ‘Fault in American Contract Law’ (2009) 107 Michigan Law Review 1431–1600
, ‘Pre-Contractual Liability’, in (ed.), UK Law in the 1990s (1990), 90 ff
, ‘Work Carried Out in Pursuance of Letters of Intent – Contract or Restitution?’ (1983) 99 LQR572, especially 576–9 and 581–2Google Scholar
and (eds.), Precontractual Liability in European Private Law (Cambridge, 2008)
, ‘Liability in Tort for Pre-Contractual Non-Disclosure’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Work Done in Anticipation of a Contract Which Does Not Materialise’, in , , and (eds.), Restitution: Past, Present and Future (Oxford, 1998)Google Scholar
, ‘Towards a European Civil Code: The Duty of Good Faith’, in and (eds.), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Oxford, 1998), 244, 253 n. 30Google Scholar
, ‘The Status of Agreements to Negotiate in Good Faith’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 LQR433, 439Google Scholar
, ‘A Role for Tort in Pre-Contractual Negotiations? An Examination of English, French, and Canadian Law’ (2003) 52 ICLQ968Google Scholar
and (eds.), Good Faith in European Contract Law (Cambridge, 2000), 236–57
, ‘Towards a European Civil Code: The Duty of Good Faith’, in and (eds.), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Oxford, 1998), 244, 253 n. 30Google Scholar
, ‘The Status of Agreements to Negotiate in Good Faith’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 LQR433, 439Google Scholar
, ‘A Role for Tort in Pre-Contractual Negotiations? An Examination of English, French, and Canadian Law’ (2003) 52 ICLQ968Google Scholar
and (eds.), Good Faith in European Contract Law (Cambridge, 2000), 236–57
, ‘Work Carried Out in Pursuance of Letters of Intent – Contract or Restitution?’ (1983) 99 LQR572Google Scholar
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 341–7
, ‘Contractual Mistake, Intention in Formation and Vitiation …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 341 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Offer and Acceptance in the Electronic Age’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010) (e-mail, and offer and acceptance)Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 4Google Scholar
, (1996) New Law Journal 597, 562 (case note on Schelde Delta Shipping BV v. Astarte Shipping BV (‘The Pamela’) (reception of automated office communications))
, ‘Trashing with Trollope: A Deconstruction of the Postal Rules in Contract’ (1992) 12 OJLS170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Firm Offers (Working Paper No. 60, 1975)
, ‘Quackery and Contract Law: The Case of the Carbolic Smoke Ball’ (1985) 14 JLS345 (reprinted in , Leading Cases in the Common Law (Oxford, 1995), chapter 10)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1975] CLJ 25 (case note on South African decision concerning retraction of posted acceptance)
, ‘Work Carried Out in Pursuance of Letters of Intent – Contract or Restitution?’ (1983) 99 LQR572Google Scholar
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 341–7
, ‘Contractual Mistake, Intention in Formation and Vitiation …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 341 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Offer and Acceptance in the Electronic Age’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010) (e-mail, and offer and acceptance)Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 4Google Scholar
, (1996) New Law Journal 597, 562 (case note on Schelde Delta Shipping BV v. Astarte Shipping BV (‘The Pamela’) (reception of automated office communications))
, ‘Trashing with Trollope: A Deconstruction of the Postal Rules in Contract’ (1992) 12 OJLS170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Firm Offers (Working Paper No. 60, 1975)
, ‘Quackery and Contract Law: The Case of the Carbolic Smoke Ball’ (1985) 14 JLS345 (reprinted in , Leading Cases in the Common Law (Oxford, 1995), chapter 10)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1975] CLJ 25 (case note on South African decision concerning retraction of posted acceptance)
, ‘Consideration: A Restatement’, in , Essays on Contract (Oxford, 1996); for a reply to this, see G. H. Treitel, ‘Consideration: A Critical Analysis of Professor Atiyah's Fundamental Restatement’ (1976) 50 Australian Law Journal 439Google Scholar
, Sixth Interim Report on ‘The Statute of Frauds and the Doctrine of Consideration’ (1937, Cmd 5449), at [17] to [40] and [50]
, ‘Principle in Contract Law: The Doctrine of Consideration’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 51 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Consideration and Variations: A Different Solution’ (2004) 120 LQR19 (noting Antons Trawling Co. Ltd v. Smith (2003) (a New Zealand case))Google Scholar
P. Luther, ‘Espinasse and the Sailors …’ (1999) LS 526 (on the discrepancies between the two reports of Stilk v. Myrick (1809))
, ‘The Enforceability of Additional Contractual Promises: A Question of Consideration?’ (1991) 14 NZULR270Google Scholar
, ‘Consideration, Practical Benefit and the Emperor's New Clothes’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 130–2Google Scholar
, ‘A Bird in the Hand: Consideration and Promissory Estoppel’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Formation: Promissory Estoppel’, in A. Burrows and E. (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Confining and Defining Proprietary Estoppel: The Role of Unconscionability’ (2010) 30 LS408Google Scholar
, and , in and (eds.), Land Law: Themes and Perspectives (Oxford, 1998), chapters 18, 19 and 20, especially at 482–5 and 496–505Google Scholar
, ‘Estoppels and Rights-Creating Events …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 199 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Estoppel and Obligation: The Modern Role of Estoppel by Convention’ (1989) Legal Studies16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Consideration: A Restatement’, in , Essays on Contract (Oxford, 1996); for a reply to this, see G. H. Treitel, ‘Consideration: A Critical Analysis of Professor Atiyah's Fundamental Restatement’ (1976) 50 Australian Law Journal 439Google Scholar
, Sixth Interim Report on ‘The Statute of Frauds and the Doctrine of Consideration’ (1937, Cmd 5449), at [17] to [40] and [50]
, ‘Principle in Contract Law: The Doctrine of Consideration’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 51 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Consideration and Variations: A Different Solution’ (2004) 120 LQR19 (noting Antons Trawling Co. Ltd v. Smith (2003) (a New Zealand case))Google Scholar
P. Luther, ‘Espinasse and the Sailors …’ (1999) LS 526 (on the discrepancies between the two reports of Stilk v. Myrick (1809))
, ‘The Enforceability of Additional Contractual Promises: A Question of Consideration?’ (1991) 14 NZULR270Google Scholar
, ‘Consideration, Practical Benefit and the Emperor's New Clothes’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 130–2Google Scholar
, ‘A Bird in the Hand: Consideration and Promissory Estoppel’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Formation: Promissory Estoppel’, in A. Burrows and E. (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Confining and Defining Proprietary Estoppel: The Role of Unconscionability’ (2010) 30 LS408Google Scholar
, and , in and (eds.), Land Law: Themes and Perspectives (Oxford, 1998), chapters 18, 19 and 20, especially at 482–5 and 496–505Google Scholar
, ‘Estoppels and Rights-Creating Events …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 199 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Estoppel and Obligation: The Modern Role of Estoppel by Convention’ (1989) Legal Studies16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Luther, ‘Espinasse and the Sailors …’ (1999) LS 526 (on the discrepancies between the two reports of Stilk v. Myrick (1809))
, ‘The Enforceability of Additional Contractual Promises: A Question of Consideration?’ (1991) 14 NZULR270Google Scholar
, ‘Consideration, Practical Benefit and the Emperor's New Clothes’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 130–2Google Scholar
, ‘A Bird in the Hand: Consideration and Promissory Estoppel’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Formation: Promissory Estoppel’, in A. Burrows and E. (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Confining and Defining Proprietary Estoppel: The Role of Unconscionability’ (2010) 30 LS408Google Scholar
, and , in and (eds.), Land Law: Themes and Perspectives (Oxford, 1998), chapters 18, 19 and 20, especially at 482–5 and 496–505Google Scholar
, ‘Estoppels and Rights-Creating Events …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 199 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Estoppel and Obligation: The Modern Role of Estoppel by Convention’ (1989) Legal Studies16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Gentleman's Agreement in Legal Theory and in Modern Practice’ (2000) 29 Anglo-American Law Review204Google Scholar
, ‘Keeping Contract in its Place – Balfour v. Balfour and the Enforceability of Informal Agreements’ (1985) 5 OJLS391, especially 400–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1985] CLJ 356 (noting Alpenstow Ltd v. Regalian Properties Ltd [1985] 1 WLR 721; ‘subject to contract’)
, ‘Innovation in Nineteenth Century Contract Law’ (1975) 91 LQR247, 263–5; and ‘Quackery and Contract Law: The Case of the Carbolic Smoke Ball’ (1985) 14 JLS 345 (reprinted in , Leading Cases in the Common Law (Oxford, 1995), 259 ff)Google Scholar
, ‘The Gentleman's Agreement in Legal Theory and in Modern Practice’ (2000) 29 Anglo-American Law Review204Google Scholar
, ‘Keeping Contract in its Place – Balfour v. Balfour and the Enforceability of Informal Agreements’ (1985) 5 OJLS391, especially 400–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1985] CLJ 356 (noting Alpenstow Ltd v. Regalian Properties Ltd [1985] 1 WLR 721; ‘subject to contract’)
, ‘Innovation in Nineteenth Century Contract Law’ (1975) 91 LQR247, 263–5; and ‘Quackery and Contract Law: The Case of the Carbolic Smoke Ball’ (1985) 14 JLS 345 (reprinted in , Leading Cases in the Common Law (Oxford, 1995), 259 ff)Google Scholar
, (1995) 69 Tulane Law Review 1393 (review of Vernon Palmer, The Paths to Privity (San Francisco, 1992))Google Scholar
(ed.), Privity of Contract (London, 2000), chapters 1 and 2
, ‘Contracts in Favour of Third Persons in Europe’ (2003) European Review of Private Law8Google Scholar
, Privity of Contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties (Law Commission Report No. 242, Cm 3329, London, 1996)
J. Beatson, in the Law Commission Consultation Paper, Privity of Contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 121, 1991)
(ed.), Privity (Aldershot, 2001)
, Privity of Contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties (Law Commission Report No. 242, 1996), notably Parts VII and XI
, ‘Strangers to Justice No Longer: Reversal of the Privity Rule under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’ [2001] CLJ353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A Review of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and its Implications for Commercial Contracts’ [2000] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly540Google Scholar
, ‘A Birthday Present for Lord Denning: The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’ (2000) 63 MLR721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’ (2004) 120 LQR292 (who bemoans its enactment)Google Scholar
, ‘No Damages for a Third Party's Loss’ (2001) 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (1999) 115 LQR 394 (on the Panatown case)
, ‘The Common Law at Work: The Saga of Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v. Panatown’ (2003) 3 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (1998) 114 LQR 527 (on the Panatown case)
, (1999) 155 LQR 535 (on the Panatown case)
(ed.), Privity of Contract (London, 2000), 2.18 to 2.25
, (1939) 55 LQR 189, 208
, (1982) 98 LQR 17 (a note)
, [1998] Conveyancer 99
, (1965) 2 University of British Columbia Law Review 103
(ed.), Privity of Contract (London, 2000), chapters 3 and 4
, (1995) 69 Tulane Law Review 1393 (review of Vernon Palmer, The Paths to Privity (San Francisco, 1992))Google Scholar
(ed.), Privity of Contract (London, 2000), chapters 1 and 2
, ‘Contracts in Favour of Third Persons in Europe’ (2003) European Review of Private Law8Google Scholar
, Privity of Contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties (Law Commission Report No. 242, Cm 3329, London, 1996)
J. Beatson, in the Law Commission Consultation Paper, Privity of Contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 121, 1991)
(ed.), Privity (Aldershot, 2001)
, Privity of Contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties (Law Commission Report No. 242, 1996), notably Parts VII and XI
, ‘Strangers to Justice No Longer: Reversal of the Privity Rule under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’ [2001] CLJ353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A Review of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and its Implications for Commercial Contracts’ [2000] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly540Google Scholar
, ‘A Birthday Present for Lord Denning: The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’ (2000) 63 MLR721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’ (2004) 120 LQR292 (who bemoans its enactment)Google Scholar
, ‘No Damages for a Third Party's Loss’ (2001) 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (1999) 115 LQR 394 (on the Panatown case)
, ‘The Common Law at Work: The Saga of Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v. Panatown’ (2003) 3 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (1998) 114 LQR 527 (on the Panatown case)
, (1999) 155 LQR 535 (on the Panatown case)
(ed.), Privity of Contract (London, 2000), 2.18 to 2.25
, (1939) 55 LQR 189, 208
, (1982) 98 LQR 17 (a note)
, [1998] Conveyancer 99
, (1965) 2 University of British Columbia Law Review 103
, ‘No Damages for a Third Party's Loss’ (2001) 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (1999) 115 LQR 394 (on the Panatown case)
, ‘The Common Law at Work: The Saga of Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v. Panatown’ (2003) 3 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (1998) 114 LQR 527 (on the Panatown case)
, (1999) 155 LQR 535 (on the Panatown case)
(ed.), Privity of Contract (London, 2000), 2.18 to 2.25
, (1939) 55 LQR 189, 208
, (1982) 98 LQR 17 (a note)
, [1998] Conveyancer 99
, (1965) 2 University of British Columbia Law Review 103
(ed.), Privity of Contract (London, 2000), chapters 3 and 4
, The Assignment of Contractual Rights (Oxford, 2006) (provides a large bibliography at 1.01)Google Scholar
Anson's Law of Contract (29th edn, Oxford, 2010), chapter 11
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), chapter 19
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. , and (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), chapters 6 and 7Google Scholar
, ‘Assignments, Trusts, Property, and Obligations’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 267 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Problems in Assignment Law’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘The Nature of Equitable Assignment and Anti-Assignment Clauses’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 283 ffGoogle Scholar
, The Assignment of Contractual Rights (Oxford, 2006) (provides a large bibliography at 1.01)Google Scholar
Anson's Law of Contract (29th edn, Oxford, 2010), chapter 11
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), chapter 19
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. , and (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), chapters 6 and 7Google Scholar
, ‘Assignments, Trusts, Property, and Obligations’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 267 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Problems in Assignment Law’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘The Nature of Equitable Assignment and Anti-Assignment Clauses’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 283 ffGoogle Scholar
Spencer Bower, Turner and Handley's Actionable Misrepresentation, ed. (4th edn, London, 2000)
, Mistake and Misrepresentation: A Study in Contractual Principles (London, 1968), chapters 6 ffGoogle Scholar
Law Reform Committee, Innocent Misrepresentation (Law Reform Committee 10th Report, Cmnd 1782, 1962)
and , ‘Deceit, Damages and the Misrepresentation Act 1967, Section 2(1)’ [1992] LMCLQ40Google Scholar
, (1991) 107 LQR 547 (case note)
, ‘Pre-Contractual Misrepresentation and the Limits of the Principles in With v. O'Flanagan’ [2005] CLJ94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Illegal Transactions: The Effect of Illegality on Contracts and Trusts (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 154, London, 1999)
, ‘Objectivity, Mistake and the Parol Evidence Rule’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 6, at 107 ffGoogle Scholar
, [2001] CLJ 239
, (2001) 117 LQR 545, 549 (case note on the Watford Electronics case)
, (2003) 119 LQR 537
, Misrepresentation, Mistake and Non-Disclosure (2nd edn, London, 2007), chapters 16 and 17Google Scholar
Spencer Bower, Turner and Sutton: Actionable Non-Disclosure (2nd edn, London, 1990)
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 203 ffCrossRef
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 434 ff
New Zealand, Misrepresentations and Breach of Contract (Report of the Contracts and Commercial Law Reform Committee, Wellington, 1967, reprinted 1978), especially at 9.4.1
Spencer Bower, Turner and Handley's Actionable Misrepresentation, ed. (4th edn, London, 2000)
, Mistake and Misrepresentation: A Study in Contractual Principles (London, 1968), chapters 6 ffGoogle Scholar
Law Reform Committee, Innocent Misrepresentation (Law Reform Committee 10th Report, Cmnd 1782, 1962)
and , ‘Deceit, Damages and the Misrepresentation Act 1967, Section 2(1)’ [1992] LMCLQ40Google Scholar
, (1991) 107 LQR 547 (case note)
, ‘Pre-Contractual Misrepresentation and the Limits of the Principles in With v. O'Flanagan’ [2005] CLJ94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Illegal Transactions: The Effect of Illegality on Contracts and Trusts (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 154, London, 1999)
, ‘Objectivity, Mistake and the Parol Evidence Rule’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 6, at 107 ffGoogle Scholar
, [2001] CLJ 239
, (2001) 117 LQR 545, 549 (case note on the Watford Electronics case)
, (2003) 119 LQR 537
, Misrepresentation, Mistake and Non-Disclosure (2nd edn, London, 2007), chapters 16 and 17Google Scholar
Spencer Bower, Turner and Sutton: Actionable Non-Disclosure (2nd edn, London, 1990)
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 203 ffCrossRef
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 434 ff
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 203 ffCrossRef
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 434 ff
New Zealand, Misrepresentations and Breach of Contract (Report of the Contracts and Commercial Law Reform Committee, Wellington, 1967, reprinted 1978), especially at 9.4.1
, and , ‘Common Mistake, Theoretical Justification and Remedial Inflexibility’ [2004] JBL34–58Google Scholar
, ‘Contractual Mistake, Intention in Formation and Vitiation …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 341 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Objective Principle and Mistake …’ (2003) 119 LQR68–85 (thereafter dealing with mistake and restitutionary claims)Google Scholar
, Mistake and Misrepresentation: A Study in Contractual Principles (London, 1968), chapters 1–5Google Scholar
, ‘Contracts – Mistake, Frustration and Implied Terms’ (1994) 110 LQR400–19 (radical criticism of mistake doctrine) (earlier criticism along the same lines can be found in C. J. Slade, ‘The Myth of Mistake in the English Law of Contract’ (1954) 70 LQR 386)Google Scholar
, (1959) 75 LQR 487
, ‘How Temptation Led to Mistake: An Exposition of Bell v. Lever Bros Ltd’ (2003) 119 LQR625Google Scholar
, (2003) 119 LQR 177
, (2003) 119 LQR 180
, [2003] CLJ 29
, [2003] Conv 247
, ‘Mistaken Assumptions in Equity: Sound Doctrine or Chimera?’ (2004) 40 Canadian Business Law J46Google Scholar
, and , ‘Common Mistake, Theoretical Justification and Remedial Inflexibility’ [2004] JBL34–58Google Scholar
, ‘Coming to Terms with The Great Peace in Common Mistake’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 319 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Solle v. Butcher’, in and (eds.), Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Oxford, 2006), chapter 12 (see ibid., 354 n. 166, for the citation of the large academic literature on the Solle case)Google Scholar
, [1990] LMCLQ 338
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), 5-102
, ‘Objectivity, Mistake and the Parol Evidence Rule’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 6, at 110 ffGoogle Scholar
Law Reform Committee, Transfer of Title to Chattels (Twelfth Report of the Law Reform Committee, Cmnd 2958, 1966)
, and , ‘Common Mistake, Theoretical Justification and Remedial Inflexibility’ [2004] JBL34–58Google Scholar
, ‘Contractual Mistake, Intention in Formation and Vitiation …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 341 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Objective Principle and Mistake …’ (2003) 119 LQR68–85 (thereafter dealing with mistake and restitutionary claims)Google Scholar
, Mistake and Misrepresentation: A Study in Contractual Principles (London, 1968), chapters 1–5Google Scholar
, ‘Contracts – Mistake, Frustration and Implied Terms’ (1994) 110 LQR400–19 (radical criticism of mistake doctrine) (earlier criticism along the same lines can be found in C. J. Slade, ‘The Myth of Mistake in the English Law of Contract’ (1954) 70 LQR 386)Google Scholar
, (1959) 75 LQR 487
, ‘How Temptation Led to Mistake: An Exposition of Bell v. Lever Bros Ltd’ (2003) 119 LQR625Google Scholar
, (2003) 119 LQR 177
, (2003) 119 LQR 180
, [2003] CLJ 29
, [2003] Conv 247
, ‘Mistaken Assumptions in Equity: Sound Doctrine or Chimera?’ (2004) 40 Canadian Business Law J46Google Scholar
, and , ‘Common Mistake, Theoretical Justification and Remedial Inflexibility’ [2004] JBL34–58Google Scholar
, ‘Coming to Terms with The Great Peace in Common Mistake’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 319 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Solle v. Butcher’, in and (eds.), Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Oxford, 2006), chapter 12 (see ibid., 354 n. 166, for the citation of the large academic literature on the Solle case)Google Scholar
, (1959) 75 LQR 487
, ‘How Temptation Led to Mistake: An Exposition of Bell v. Lever Bros Ltd’ (2003) 119 LQR625Google Scholar
, (2003) 119 LQR 177
, (2003) 119 LQR 180
, [2003] CLJ 29
, [2003] Conv 247
, ‘Mistaken Assumptions in Equity: Sound Doctrine or Chimera?’ (2004) 40 Canadian Business Law J46Google Scholar
, and , ‘Common Mistake, Theoretical Justification and Remedial Inflexibility’ [2004] JBL34–58Google Scholar
, ‘Coming to Terms with The Great Peace in Common Mistake’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 319 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Solle v. Butcher’, in and (eds.), Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Oxford, 2006), chapter 12 (see ibid., 354 n. 166, for the citation of the large academic literature on the Solle case)Google Scholar
, [1990] LMCLQ 338
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), 5-102
, ‘Objectivity, Mistake and the Parol Evidence Rule’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 6, at 110 ffGoogle Scholar
Law Reform Committee, Transfer of Title to Chattels (Twelfth Report of the Law Reform Committee, Cmnd 2958, 1966)
, ‘Objectivity, Mistake and the Parol Evidence Rule’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 6, at 110 ffGoogle Scholar
Law Reform Committee, Transfer of Title to Chattels (Twelfth Report of the Law Reform Committee, Cmnd 2958, 1966)
, (2001) 117 LQR 376
, [1961] CLJ 191, 192
, [2000] Restitution Law Review 105–14
, ‘Economic Duress: Recent Difficulties and Possible Alternatives’ [1997] Restitution Law Review53Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 6Google Scholar
, Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionable Dealing (2006), Part II
, [2002] CLJ 29–32
, (2002) 118 LQR 337–51
, ‘From Morgan to Etridge: Tracing the (Dis)Integration of Undue Influence …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 379 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Contract and the Liberal Conception of Contract: Observing Basic Distinctions Part II’ (2000) 16 Journal of Contract Law191, 200Google Scholar
, ‘Contracts by Unfair Advantage: From Exploitation to Transactional Neglect’ (1995) 16 OJLS503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1997] Restitution Law Review 72
and , ‘On the Nature of Undue Influence’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995) 57, especially at 57–60, 63–5, 85–8 and 92–7Google Scholar
, ‘Undue Influence: Beyond Impaired Consent and Wrongdoing Towards a Relational Analysis’, in and (eds.), Mapping the Law: Essays in Memory of Peter Birks (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar
, ‘Duress, Undue Influence, and Unconscionable Bargains – The Theoretical Mesh’ (1999) 18 NZULR509Google Scholar
and , ‘Unconscionability and the Taxonomy of Undue Influence’ [2007] JBL 541, at 560–1Google Scholar
, ‘The Place of Equity and Equitable Doctrines in the Contemporary Common Law World – An Australian Perspective’, in (ed.), Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Toronto: 1993)Google Scholar
, Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionable Dealing (2006), Part III
and , ‘On the Nature of Undue Influence’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 57Google Scholar
, ‘The Doctrine of Inequality of Bargaining Power: Post-Benthamite Economics in the House of Lords’ (1976) 26 University of Toronto Law Journal359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (2001) 117 LQR 376
, [1961] CLJ 191, 192
, [2000] Restitution Law Review 105–14
, ‘Economic Duress: Recent Difficulties and Possible Alternatives’ [1997] Restitution Law Review53Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 6Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 6Google Scholar
, Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionable Dealing (2006), Part II
, [2002] CLJ 29–32
, (2002) 118 LQR 337–51
, ‘From Morgan to Etridge: Tracing the (Dis)Integration of Undue Influence …’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 379 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Contract and the Liberal Conception of Contract: Observing Basic Distinctions Part II’ (2000) 16 Journal of Contract Law191, 200Google Scholar
, ‘Contracts by Unfair Advantage: From Exploitation to Transactional Neglect’ (1995) 16 OJLS503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1997] Restitution Law Review 72
and , ‘On the Nature of Undue Influence’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995) 57, especially at 57–60, 63–5, 85–8 and 92–7Google Scholar
, ‘Undue Influence: Beyond Impaired Consent and Wrongdoing Towards a Relational Analysis’, in and (eds.), Mapping the Law: Essays in Memory of Peter Birks (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar
, ‘Duress, Undue Influence, and Unconscionable Bargains – The Theoretical Mesh’ (1999) 18 NZULR509Google Scholar
and , ‘Unconscionability and the Taxonomy of Undue Influence’ [2007] JBL 541, at 560–1Google Scholar
, ‘The Place of Equity and Equitable Doctrines in the Contemporary Common Law World – An Australian Perspective’, in (ed.), Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Toronto: 1993)Google Scholar
, Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionable Dealing (2006), Part III
and , ‘On the Nature of Undue Influence’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 57Google Scholar
, ‘The Doctrine of Inequality of Bargaining Power: Post-Benthamite Economics in the House of Lords’ (1976) 26 University of Toronto Law Journal359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007)
, Illegal Transactions: The Effect of Illegality on Contracts and Trusts (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 154, London, 1999)
, The Parol Evidence Rule (1976)
, Contracts and English Dispute Resolution (Tokyo, 2010), chapters 21 and 22 for a succinct introduction to arbitration and mediationGoogle Scholar
, ‘Law and Practice of Escalation Clauses’ (2006) 22 Arbitration International1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Retention of Title Clauses: A Question of Balance’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 14 (see also chapter 13 on implied terms, and chapter 15 on exclusion clauses)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Status and Operation of Unilateral or Optional Arbitration Clauses’ (2006) 22 Arbitration International133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Contracts and English Dispute Resolution (Tokyo, 2010), chapters 21 and 22 for a succinct introduction to arbitration and mediationGoogle Scholar
, ‘Law and Practice of Escalation Clauses’ (2006) 22 Arbitration International1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Retention of Title Clauses: A Question of Balance’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 14 (see also chapter 13 on implied terms, and chapter 15 on exclusion clauses)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Status and Operation of Unilateral or Optional Arbitration Clauses’ (2006) 22 Arbitration International133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Implication in Fact as an Instance of Contractual Interpretation’ [2004] CLJ384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Implied Terms … A Modern History’ [1998] JBL1 (see also Phang's articles in [1990] JBL 394; [1993] JBL 242; and [1994] JBL 255)Google Scholar
, ‘The Implied Terms of Contracts: Of “Default Rules” and “Situation-Sense”’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 191 (mostly from a US perspective)Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 LQR433, 442Google Scholar
, The Construction of Contracts: Interpretation, Implication and Rectification (Oxford, 2007) (see also McMeel's articles in [1998] LMCLQ 382; (2003) 119 LQR 272; (2005) 34 Common Law World Review 256; and [2006] LMCLQ 49)Google Scholar
, ‘The Intolerable Wrestle with Words and Meanings’ (1997) South Africa Law Journal656Google Scholar
, ‘Implication in Fact as an Instance of Contractual Interpretation’ [2004] CLJ384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Law of Contract: The Parol Evidence Rule (Law Commission Report No. 154, Cmnd 9700, London, 1986) (noted by G. Marston, [1986] CLJ 192; see also D. W. McLaughlan, The Parol Evidence Rule (1976))
, ‘The Interpretation of Contracts: Lord Hoffmann's Restatement’, in (ed.), Commercial Law and Commercial Practice (Oxford, 2003)Google Scholar
, ‘Written Contracts: To What Extent May Evidence Control Language?’ (1988) 41 CLP23 (see also J. Steyn, [1996] CLP 43; (1997) 113 LQR 433; and (2003) 25 Sydney Law Review 5); and in B. Markesinis (ed.), The Clifford Chance Millennium Lectures: The Coming Together of the Common Law and the Civil Law (Oxford, 2000), Essay 5; on Lord Steyn's contribution to interpretation, see E. McKendrick, in S. Worthington (ed.), Commercial Law and Commercial Practice (Oxford, 2003), 158 n. 86Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 7, at 183Google Scholar
, ‘The UNIDROIT Principles and CISG – Sources of Inspiration for English Courts?’ (2006) 11 Uniform Law Review305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 144CrossRef
, ‘On Comparing French and English Contract Law: Insights from Social Contract Theory’ (2009), http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2009/01/valcke-on-compa.html
, ‘Contractual Interpretation at Common Law and Civil Law: An Exercise in Comparative Legal Rhetoric’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 77 ffGoogle Scholar
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 311
, ‘Interpretation of Contracts: Concluding Comparative Observations’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 7Google Scholar
, (1961) 77 LQR 313 (on A Roberts and Co. Ltd v. Leicestershire County Council [1961] Ch 555)
, in Butterworths Law of Contract (3rd edn, 2007), 4.112 ff
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), 5-107 ff
Treitel (12th edn, London, 2007), 8-059 ff
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. R. P. Meagher, J. D. Heydon and M. J. Leeming (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), chapter 26
Snell's Principles of Equity (31st edn, London, 2005), chapter 14
Spry's Equitable Remedies (6th edn, Sydney, 2001), chapter 6
, The Construction of Contracts: Interpretation, Implication and Rectification (Oxford, 2007) (see also McMeel's articles in [1998] LMCLQ 382; (2003) 119 LQR 272; (2005) 34 Common Law World Review 256; and [2006] LMCLQ 49)Google Scholar
, ‘The Intolerable Wrestle with Words and Meanings’ (1997) South Africa Law Journal656Google Scholar
, ‘Implication in Fact as an Instance of Contractual Interpretation’ [2004] CLJ384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Law of Contract: The Parol Evidence Rule (Law Commission Report No. 154, Cmnd 9700, London, 1986) (noted by G. Marston, [1986] CLJ 192; see also D. W. McLaughlan, The Parol Evidence Rule (1976))
, ‘The Interpretation of Contracts: Lord Hoffmann's Restatement’, in (ed.), Commercial Law and Commercial Practice (Oxford, 2003)Google Scholar
, ‘Written Contracts: To What Extent May Evidence Control Language?’ (1988) 41 CLP23 (see also J. Steyn, [1996] CLP 43; (1997) 113 LQR 433; and (2003) 25 Sydney Law Review 5); and in B. Markesinis (ed.), The Clifford Chance Millennium Lectures: The Coming Together of the Common Law and the Civil Law (Oxford, 2000), Essay 5; on Lord Steyn's contribution to interpretation, see E. McKendrick, in S. Worthington (ed.), Commercial Law and Commercial Practice (Oxford, 2003), 158 n. 86Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 7, at 183Google Scholar
, ‘The UNIDROIT Principles and CISG – Sources of Inspiration for English Courts?’ (2006) 11 Uniform Law Review305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 144CrossRef
, ‘On Comparing French and English Contract Law: Insights from Social Contract Theory’ (2009), http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2009/01/valcke-on-compa.html
, ‘Contractual Interpretation at Common Law and Civil Law: An Exercise in Comparative Legal Rhetoric’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 77 ffGoogle Scholar
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 311
, ‘Interpretation of Contracts: Concluding Comparative Observations’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 7Google Scholar
, (1961) 77 LQR 313 (on A Roberts and Co. Ltd v. Leicestershire County Council [1961] Ch 555)
, in Butterworths Law of Contract (3rd edn, 2007), 4.112 ff
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), 5-107 ff
Treitel (12th edn, London, 2007), 8-059 ff
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. R. P. Meagher, J. D. Heydon and M. J. Leeming (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), chapter 26
Snell's Principles of Equity (31st edn, London, 2005), chapter 14
Spry's Equitable Remedies (6th edn, Sydney, 2001), chapter 6
, [1988] CLJ 172
and , (1988) 104 LQR 359
, ‘Lord Bingham's Contributions to Commercial Law’, in and (eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford, 2009), 668–71Google Scholar
, ‘Whither Contra Proferentem?’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 4Google Scholar
, (2003) 119 LQR 537–41
Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, Unfair Terms in Contracts (Law Commission Report No. 292 and Scottish Law Commission Report No. 199, 2005) (on which see H. Beale and T. Goriely, (2005) NLJ 318, 338)
, ‘Unfair Contract Terms Act – Thirty Years On’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 8Google Scholar
, ‘Exclusion and Limitation Clauses in Business Contracts: Transparency’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 10Google Scholar
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), chapter 15
, ‘Unfairness and Consumer Contract Regulations’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 9Google Scholar
, [2002] CLJ 22 (on Director General of Fair Trading v. First National Bank plc (2002))
, (2001) 117 LQR 545, 549 (case note on the Watford Electronics case)
, [1988] CLJ 172
and , (1988) 104 LQR 359
, ‘Lord Bingham's Contributions to Commercial Law’, in and (eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford, 2009), 668–71Google Scholar
, ‘Whither Contra Proferentem?’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 4Google Scholar
, (2003) 119 LQR 537–41
Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, Unfair Terms in Contracts (Law Commission Report No. 292 and Scottish Law Commission Report No. 199, 2005) (on which see H. Beale and T. Goriely, (2005) NLJ 318, 338)
, ‘Unfair Contract Terms Act – Thirty Years On’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 8Google Scholar
, ‘Exclusion and Limitation Clauses in Business Contracts: Transparency’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 10Google Scholar
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), chapter 15
, ‘Unfairness and Consumer Contract Regulations’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 9Google Scholar
, [2002] CLJ 22 (on Director General of Fair Trading v. First National Bank plc (2002))
, (2001) 117 LQR 545, 549 (case note on the Watford Electronics case)
(ed.), Force Majeure and Frustration of Contract (2nd edn, 1995)
, ‘Increased Expense and Frustration’, in (ed.), Consensus ad Idem: Essays in the Law of Contract in Honour of Guenter Treitel (London, 1996), 121Google Scholar
, ‘The Regulation of Long-Term Contracts in English Law’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 305Google Scholar
, ‘The Regulation of Long-Term Contracts in English Law’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 305Google Scholar
, ‘Force Majeure Clauses: The Gap Between Doctrine and Practice’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 12Google Scholar
, in (ed.), Consensus ad Idem: Essays in the Law of Contract in Honour of Guenter Treitel (London, 1996), chapter 1Google Scholar
, ‘Frustration, Restitution and Loss Adjustment’, in (ed.), Essays on Restitution (Oxford, 1991), 147Google Scholar
, Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 (1944)
, (1974) 48 Tulane Law Review 946
, ‘Contract Modification as a Result of Change of Circumstances’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 357Google Scholar
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 333 ffCrossRef
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 722
, ‘The Regulation of Long-Term Contracts in English Law’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 305Google Scholar
, ‘Force Majeure Clauses: The Gap Between Doctrine and Practice’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 12Google Scholar
, in (ed.), Consensus ad Idem: Essays in the Law of Contract in Honour of Guenter Treitel (London, 1996), chapter 1Google Scholar
, ‘Frustration, Restitution and Loss Adjustment’, in (ed.), Essays on Restitution (Oxford, 1991), 147Google Scholar
, Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 (1944)
, (1974) 48 Tulane Law Review 946
, ‘Contract Modification as a Result of Change of Circumstances’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 357Google Scholar
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 333 ffCrossRef
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 722
, ‘Retrieving Reasons, Retrieving Rationality: A New Look at the Right to Withdraw for Breach of Contract’ (1992) 5 Journal of Contract Law83Google Scholar
, ‘Suspending Contract Performance for Breach’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 485Google Scholar
, ‘Anticipatory Breach of Contract’, in and (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Commercial Law: Essays in Honour of A. G. Guest (London, 1994), 175Google Scholar
, ‘Termination Clauses’, in and (eds.), Contract Terms (Oxford, 2007), chapter 13 (discussion of many related decisions concerning ‘material breach’ and similar contract drafting)Google Scholar
, in W. Cornish, J. S. Anderson, R. Cocks, M. Lobban, P. Polden and K. Smith, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XII, 1820–1914: Private Law (Oxford, 2010), 485 ffGoogle Scholar
(with P. Schlechtriem), ‘Breach of Contract’, in International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, vol. VII, Contracts in General (Tübingen, 1999), 15–129Google Scholar
(with P. Schlechtriem), ‘Breach of Contract’, in International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, vol. VII, Contracts in General (Tübingen, 1999), chapter 15 (Anglo-American, Commonwealth and civilian laws)Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 11Google Scholar
, ‘A “Period of Grace” for Contractual Performance?’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 1083 (comparing breach of time obligations in French and English law)Google Scholar
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 385 ffCrossRef
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 849 ff
, [1973] CLJ 196
, (1974) 37 MLR 104
, (1973) 89 LQR 464 (Schuler (L) AG v. Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd (1974))
, [1976] CLJ 33 (‘The Hansa Nord’ (1976))
, [1991] CLJ 29 (Bunge Corporation New York v. Tradax SA (1981))
, [1996] CLJ 430 (Vitol SA v. Norelf Ltd (1996))
and , [1998] CLJ 253 (Stocznia Gdanska SA v. Latvian SS Co. (1998))
(with P. Schlechtriem), ‘Breach of Contract’, in International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, vol. VII, Contracts in General (Tübingen, 1999), 15-16 to 15-19 and 15-124 to 15-128Google Scholar
, Pecuniary Restitution on Breach of Contract (Law Commission Report No. 121, 1983), 36–7
, in W. Cornish, J. S. Anderson, R. Cocks, M. Lobban, P. Polden and K. Smith, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XII, 1820–1914: Private Law (Oxford, 2010), 485 ffGoogle Scholar
(with P. Schlechtriem), ‘Breach of Contract’, in International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, vol. VII, Contracts in General (Tübingen, 1999), 15–129Google Scholar
(with P. Schlechtriem), ‘Breach of Contract’, in International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, vol. VII, Contracts in General (Tübingen, 1999), chapter 15 (Anglo-American, Commonwealth and civilian laws)Google Scholar
, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 11Google Scholar
, ‘A “Period of Grace” for Contractual Performance?’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 1083 (comparing breach of time obligations in French and English law)Google Scholar
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006), 385 ffCrossRef
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009), 849 ff
, [1973] CLJ 196
, (1974) 37 MLR 104
, (1973) 89 LQR 464 (Schuler (L) AG v. Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd (1974))
, [1976] CLJ 33 (‘The Hansa Nord’ (1976))
, [1991] CLJ 29 (Bunge Corporation New York v. Tradax SA (1981))
, [1996] CLJ 430 (Vitol SA v. Norelf Ltd (1996))
and , [1998] CLJ 253 (Stocznia Gdanska SA v. Latvian SS Co. (1998))
(with P. Schlechtriem), ‘Breach of Contract’, in International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, vol. VII, Contracts in General (Tübingen, 1999), 15-16 to 15-19 and 15-124 to 15-128Google Scholar
, Pecuniary Restitution on Breach of Contract (Law Commission Report No. 121, 1983), 36–7
, in (ed.), English Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford, 2007), chapter 21, at 21.17 to 21.71, 21.135 to 21.139 (damages) (discussion now to be read in light of the Transfield case on remoteness and scope of duty: 18.43 at (5), and 18.44 to 18.46); 21.167 to 21.174 (debt), 21.180 to 21.197 (specific performance), 21.200 to 21.206 and 21.214 to 21.216 (injunctions) and 21.156 to 21.159 (account of profits)Google Scholar
McGregor on Damages (18th edn, London, 2009)
(ed.), Justifying Private Law Remedies (Oxford, 2008) (various topics)
, in (ed.), English Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford, 2007), chapter 21, at 21.167 to 21.174 (debt)Google Scholar
and , ‘Performance Following Repudiation: Legal and Economic Interests’ (1999) 15 Journal of Contract Law97Google Scholar
, [1962] CLJ 12
, [1962] CLJ 213
, (1962) 78 LQR 263
, (1962) 25 MLR 364
, [1972] CLP 149
, (1991) 3 Journal of Contract Law 218
, in (ed.), English Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford, 2007), chapter 21, at 21.180 to 21.197 (specific performance), and 21.200 to 21.206 and 21.214 to 21.216 (injunctions)Google Scholar
, ‘Economic Aspects of Damages and Specific Performance Compared’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 2Google Scholar
, ‘The Choice of Remedy for Breach of Contract’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 471 ffGoogle Scholar
, Injunctions and Specific Performance (looseleaf edn, 2002)
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. , and (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), chapter 20Google Scholar
Spry's Equitable Remedies (6th edn, Sydney 2001), chapters 3 (specific performance), 4 (injunctions), 5 (injunctions and contracts) and 7 (damages and Lord Cairns' Act)
, and (eds.), Specific Performance in Contract Law: National and Other Perspectives (Antwerp, 2008)
, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account (Oxford, 1988), chapter IIICrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘For the Recognition of Remedial Terms Agreed Inter Partes’ (2010) 126 LQR448 (these are not valid under current English law: see 18.18)Google Scholar
McGregor on Damages (18th edn, London, 2009)
, Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract (3rd edn, Oxford, 2004), 21.17 to 21.71, 21.135 to 21.139 (damages) (discussion now to be read in light of the Transfield case on remoteness and scope of duty: 18.43 at (5), and 18.44 to 18.46)Google Scholar
(with D. Wilby and D. Bennett), The Law of Damages (London, 2003), chapter 6 (at 127 ff) and chapter 19Google Scholar
, ‘The Performance Interest in Contract Damages’ (1995) 111 LQR628 (considering also the ‘classic’ article by Fuller and Perdue, ‘The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages’ (1936) 46 Yale Law Journal 52 and 373 (in two parts))Google Scholar
, ‘Damages and the Protection of Contractual Reliance’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 6Google Scholar
, ‘Justifying Damages’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 139 ffGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Damages for Breach of Contract: Compensation, Restitution, and Vindication’ (2008) 28 OJLS73–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Contract Remedies and the Consumer Surplus’ (1979) 95 LQR581, especially 580–6, 595–6 and 604–10 (cited by Lord Millett in the Panatown case (2001))Google Scholar
, (2002) 118 LQR 193–6
and , ‘The Sky's the Limit: Contractual Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss’ [2002] LMCLQ161Google Scholar
, (1975) 4 Journal of Legal Studies 249
, (1994) 15 Journal of Legal History 41
, in W. Cornish, J. S. Anderson, R. Cocks, M. Lobban, P. Polden and K. Smith, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XII, 1820–1914: Private Law (Oxford, 2010), 541 ffGoogle Scholar
, (1975) 91 LQR 247, 273–7
, ‘The Classical Model of Contract: The Product of a Revolution in Legal Thought’ (2010) 30 LS513, 531Google Scholar
, (1932) 48 LQR 90, 97 ff
, (2010) 14 Edinburgh Law Review 47–61
, [2009] LMCLQ 461–87
, (2009) 9 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 109–39
, [2009] CLJ 34–7
, (2009) 13 Edinburgh Law Review 125–30
, (2009) 125 LQR 6–12
, (2009) 125 LQR 408–15
, [2010] LMCLQ 150–76
, ‘An Agreement-Centred Approach to Remoteness and Contract Damages’, in and (eds.), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (2005), 249
, ‘Hadley v. Baxendale Foreseeability: A Principle Beyond its Sell-By Date’ (2007) 23 Journal of Contract Law120Google Scholar
, ‘The Foreseeability Limitation on Liability in Contract’, in and (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen, 2004), chapter 11Google Scholar
, ‘Actual Damages, Notional Damages and Loss of a Chance’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), 419, at 424 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Expectation Damages: Avoided Loss, Offsetting Gains and Subsequent Events’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 15Google Scholar
, [2007] CLJ 263
, [2008] JBL 91
, (2007) 123 LQR 503
, (2008) 124 LQR 569–85
, ‘Lord Bingham's Contributions to Commercial Law’, in and (eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford, 2009), 679–83Google Scholar
, ‘Mitigation of Damages in Contract and the Meaning of Avoidable Loss’ (1989) 105 LQR398Google Scholar
, ‘The Market Rule of Damages Assessment’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 18Google Scholar
, ‘The Role of Mitigation in the Assessment of Damages’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 14Google Scholar
See also the Principles of European Contract Law, Article 9:505; UNIDROIT's Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Article 7.4.8; and the (abortive) Contract Code: Drawn up on Behalf of the English Law Commission (Milan, 1993), section 439
, [1995] CLJ 20–3
, (1993) 109 LQR 175
, Contributory Negligence as a Defence in Contract (Law Commission Report No. 219, London, 1993)
, (1995) 111 LQR 228–34
, ‘A Comparative Fault Defence in Contract Law’ (2009) 107 Michigan Law Review1397–1412 (part of the symposium on ‘Fault in American Contract Law’)Google Scholar
, ‘Liability in Unjust Enrichment Where a Contract Fails to Materialise’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Failure of Consideration’, in (ed.), Consensus ad Idem: Essays in the Law of Contract in Honour of Guenter Treitel (London, 1996), chapter 9Google Scholar
, (2002) 118 LQR 377
, in (ed.), English Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford, 2007), at 21.156 to 21.159 (account of profits)Google Scholar
, ‘The Assessment of Gains-Based Damages for Breach of Contract’ (2008) 71 MLR559–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, in A. and (eds.), Commercial Remedies: Current Issues and Problems (Oxford, 2003), 93–119Google Scholar
, (1993) 109 LQR 518–21 (on Surrey County Council v. Bredero Homes Ltd (1993), pre-Blake)
and (eds.), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (Oxford, 2005)
, ‘The Foreseeability Limitation on Liability in Contract’, in and (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen, 2004), chapter 11Google Scholar
(ed.), Justifying Private Law Remedies (Oxford, 2008) (various topics)
and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008)
, and (eds.), Specific Performance in Contract Law: National and Other Perspectives (Antwerp, 2008)
, in (ed.), English Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford, 2007), chapter 21, at 21.17 to 21.71, 21.135 to 21.139 (damages) (discussion now to be read in light of the Transfield case on remoteness and scope of duty: 18.43 at (5), and 18.44 to 18.46); 21.167 to 21.174 (debt), 21.180 to 21.197 (specific performance), 21.200 to 21.206 and 21.214 to 21.216 (injunctions) and 21.156 to 21.159 (account of profits)Google Scholar
McGregor on Damages (18th edn, London, 2009)
(ed.), Justifying Private Law Remedies (Oxford, 2008) (various topics)
, in (ed.), English Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford, 2007), chapter 21, at 21.167 to 21.174 (debt)Google Scholar
and , ‘Performance Following Repudiation: Legal and Economic Interests’ (1999) 15 Journal of Contract Law97Google Scholar
, [1962] CLJ 12
, [1962] CLJ 213
, (1962) 78 LQR 263
, (1962) 25 MLR 364
, [1972] CLP 149
, (1991) 3 Journal of Contract Law 218
, in (ed.), English Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford, 2007), chapter 21, at 21.180 to 21.197 (specific performance), and 21.200 to 21.206 and 21.214 to 21.216 (injunctions)Google Scholar
, ‘Economic Aspects of Damages and Specific Performance Compared’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 2Google Scholar
, ‘The Choice of Remedy for Breach of Contract’, in and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), 471 ffGoogle Scholar
, Injunctions and Specific Performance (looseleaf edn, 2002)
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. , and (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), chapter 20Google Scholar
Spry's Equitable Remedies (6th edn, Sydney 2001), chapters 3 (specific performance), 4 (injunctions), 5 (injunctions and contracts) and 7 (damages and Lord Cairns' Act)
, Injunctions and Specific Performance (looseleaf edn, 2002)
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. , and (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), chapter 20Google Scholar
Spry's Equitable Remedies (6th edn, Sydney 2001), chapters 3 (specific performance), 4 (injunctions), 5 (injunctions and contracts) and 7 (damages and Lord Cairns' Act)
, and (eds.), Specific Performance in Contract Law: National and Other Perspectives (Antwerp, 2008)
, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account (Oxford, 1988), chapter IIICrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘For the Recognition of Remedial Terms Agreed Inter Partes’ (2010) 126 LQR448 (these are not valid under current English law: see 18.18)Google Scholar
McGregor on Damages (18th edn, London, 2009)
, Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract (3rd edn, Oxford, 2004), 21.17 to 21.71, 21.135 to 21.139 (damages) (discussion now to be read in light of the Transfield case on remoteness and scope of duty: 18.43 at (5), and 18.44 to 18.46)Google Scholar
(with D. Wilby and D. Bennett), The Law of Damages (London, 2003), chapter 6 (at 127 ff) and chapter 19Google Scholar
, ‘The Performance Interest in Contract Damages’ (1995) 111 LQR628 (considering also the ‘classic’ article by Fuller and Perdue, ‘The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages’ (1936) 46 Yale Law Journal 52 and 373 (in two parts))Google Scholar
, ‘Damages and the Protection of Contractual Reliance’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 6Google Scholar
, ‘Justifying Damages’, in , and S. G. A. Pitel (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford, 2009), 139 ffGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Damages for Breach of Contract: Compensation, Restitution, and Vindication’ (2008) 28 OJLS73–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Contract Remedies and the Consumer Surplus’ (1979) 95 LQR581, especially 580–6, 595–6 and 604–10 (cited by Lord Millett in the Panatown case (2001))Google Scholar
, (2002) 118 LQR 193–6
and , ‘The Sky's the Limit: Contractual Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss’ [2002] LMCLQ161Google Scholar
, (1975) 4 Journal of Legal Studies 249
, (1994) 15 Journal of Legal History 41
, in W. Cornish, J. S. Anderson, R. Cocks, M. Lobban, P. Polden and K. Smith, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XII, 1820–1914: Private Law (Oxford, 2010), 541 ffGoogle Scholar
, (1975) 91 LQR 247, 273–7
, ‘The Classical Model of Contract: The Product of a Revolution in Legal Thought’ (2010) 30 LS513, 531Google Scholar
, (1932) 48 LQR 90, 97 ff
, (2010) 14 Edinburgh Law Review 47–61
, [2009] LMCLQ 461–87
, (2009) 9 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 109–39
, [2009] CLJ 34–7
, (2009) 13 Edinburgh Law Review 125–30
, (2009) 125 LQR 6–12
, (2009) 125 LQR 408–15
, [2010] LMCLQ 150–76
, ‘An Agreement-Centred Approach to Remoteness and Contract Damages’, in and (eds.), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (2005), 249
, ‘Hadley v. Baxendale Foreseeability: A Principle Beyond its Sell-By Date’ (2007) 23 Journal of Contract Law120Google Scholar
, ‘The Foreseeability Limitation on Liability in Contract’, in and (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen, 2004), chapter 11Google Scholar
, (1975) 4 Journal of Legal Studies 249
, (1994) 15 Journal of Legal History 41
, in W. Cornish, J. S. Anderson, R. Cocks, M. Lobban, P. Polden and K. Smith, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XII, 1820–1914: Private Law (Oxford, 2010), 541 ffGoogle Scholar
, (1975) 91 LQR 247, 273–7
, ‘The Classical Model of Contract: The Product of a Revolution in Legal Thought’ (2010) 30 LS513, 531Google Scholar
, (1932) 48 LQR 90, 97 ff
, (2010) 14 Edinburgh Law Review 47–61
, [2009] LMCLQ 461–87
, (2009) 9 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 109–39
, [2009] CLJ 34–7
, (2009) 13 Edinburgh Law Review 125–30
, (2009) 125 LQR 6–12
, (2009) 125 LQR 408–15
, [2010] LMCLQ 150–76
, ‘An Agreement-Centred Approach to Remoteness and Contract Damages’, in and (eds.), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (2005), 249
, ‘Hadley v. Baxendale Foreseeability: A Principle Beyond its Sell-By Date’ (2007) 23 Journal of Contract Law120Google Scholar
, ‘The Foreseeability Limitation on Liability in Contract’, in and (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen, 2004), chapter 11Google Scholar
, ‘Actual Damages, Notional Damages and Loss of a Chance’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), 419, at 424 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Expectation Damages: Avoided Loss, Offsetting Gains and Subsequent Events’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 15Google Scholar
, [2007] CLJ 263
, [2008] JBL 91
, (2007) 123 LQR 503
, (2008) 124 LQR 569–85
, ‘Lord Bingham's Contributions to Commercial Law’, in and (eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford, 2009), 679–83Google Scholar
, ‘Mitigation of Damages in Contract and the Meaning of Avoidable Loss’ (1989) 105 LQR398Google Scholar
, ‘The Market Rule of Damages Assessment’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 18Google Scholar
, ‘The Role of Mitigation in the Assessment of Damages’, in and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008), chapter 14Google Scholar
See also the Principles of European Contract Law, Article 9:505; UNIDROIT's Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Article 7.4.8; and the (abortive) Contract Code: Drawn up on Behalf of the English Law Commission (Milan, 1993), section 439
See also the Principles of European Contract Law, Article 9:505; UNIDROIT's Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Article 7.4.8; and the (abortive) Contract Code: Drawn up on Behalf of the English Law Commission (Milan, 1993), section 439
, [1995] CLJ 20–3
, (1993) 109 LQR 175
, Contributory Negligence as a Defence in Contract (Law Commission Report No. 219, London, 1993)
, (1995) 111 LQR 228–34
, ‘A Comparative Fault Defence in Contract Law’ (2009) 107 Michigan Law Review1397–1412 (part of the symposium on ‘Fault in American Contract Law’)Google Scholar
, ‘Liability in Unjust Enrichment Where a Contract Fails to Materialise’, in and (eds.), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Failure of Consideration’, in (ed.), Consensus ad Idem: Essays in the Law of Contract in Honour of Guenter Treitel (London, 1996), chapter 9Google Scholar
, (2002) 118 LQR 377
, in (ed.), English Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford, 2007), at 21.156 to 21.159 (account of profits)Google Scholar
, ‘The Assessment of Gains-Based Damages for Breach of Contract’ (2008) 71 MLR559–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, in A. and (eds.), Commercial Remedies: Current Issues and Problems (Oxford, 2003), 93–119Google Scholar
, (1993) 109 LQR 518–21 (on Surrey County Council v. Bredero Homes Ltd (1993), pre-Blake)
and (eds.), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (Oxford, 2005)
, ‘The Foreseeability Limitation on Liability in Contract’, in and (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen, 2004), chapter 11Google Scholar
(ed.), Justifying Private Law Remedies (Oxford, 2008) (various topics)
and (eds.), Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Oxford, 2008)
, and (eds.), Specific Performance in Contract Law: National and Other Perspectives (Antwerp, 2008)
, Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract (3rd edn, Oxford, 2004), 440–55, especially 449–51Google Scholar
, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account (Oxford, 1988), 208–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Controlling the Power to Agree Damages’, in (ed.), Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford, 1996), chapter 12Google Scholar
, ‘Rethinking Penalty Clauses’, in (ed.), Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford, 1996), 249Google Scholar
, ‘Agreed Remedies’, in A. and (eds.), Commercial Remedies: Current Issues and Problems (Oxford, 2003), 191Google Scholar
, ‘For the Recognition of Remedial Terms Agreed Inter Partes’ (2010) 126 LQR448, 460 ffGoogle Scholar
, Penalty Clauses (Scottish Law Commission Report No. 171, Edinburgh, 1999)
, Penalty Clauses and Forfeiture of Monies Paid (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 61, London, 1975), paras. 30 and 41
, ‘A Critique of the Penalty Limitation on Liquidated Damages’ (1977) 50 Southern California Law Review1055Google Scholar
and , ‘Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle’ (1977) 77 California Law Review554Google Scholar
, ‘Agreed Remedies’, in A. and (eds.), Commercial Remedies: Current Issues and Problems (Oxford, 2003), 191, at 205 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Relief Against Forfeiture and the Purchaser of Land’ [1984] CLJ134, at 134–5, 163–6 and 169–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1994] Conv 41
, [1993] CLJ 389
, (1993) 109 LQR 524
[1994] Conv 58
, Penalty Clauses and Forfeiture of Monies Paid (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 61, London, 1975)
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. , and (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), 18-080 to 18-125 (for Australian case law)Google Scholar
, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account (Oxford, 1988), 234 ff (for a comparative discussion)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract (3rd edn, Oxford, 2004), 440–55, especially 449–51Google Scholar
, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account (Oxford, 1988), 208–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Controlling the Power to Agree Damages’, in (ed.), Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford, 1996), chapter 12Google Scholar
, ‘Rethinking Penalty Clauses’, in (ed.), Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford, 1996), 249Google Scholar
, ‘Agreed Remedies’, in A. and (eds.), Commercial Remedies: Current Issues and Problems (Oxford, 2003), 191Google Scholar
, ‘For the Recognition of Remedial Terms Agreed Inter Partes’ (2010) 126 LQR448, 460 ffGoogle Scholar
, Penalty Clauses (Scottish Law Commission Report No. 171, Edinburgh, 1999)
, Penalty Clauses and Forfeiture of Monies Paid (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 61, London, 1975), paras. 30 and 41
, ‘A Critique of the Penalty Limitation on Liquidated Damages’ (1977) 50 Southern California Law Review1055Google Scholar
and , ‘Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle’ (1977) 77 California Law Review554Google Scholar
, ‘Agreed Remedies’, in A. and (eds.), Commercial Remedies: Current Issues and Problems (Oxford, 2003), 191, at 205 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Relief Against Forfeiture and the Purchaser of Land’ [1984] CLJ134, at 134–5, 163–6 and 169–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1994] Conv 41
, [1993] CLJ 389
, (1993) 109 LQR 524
[1994] Conv 58
, Penalty Clauses and Forfeiture of Monies Paid (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 61, London, 1975)
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. , and (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), 18-080 to 18-125 (for Australian case law)Google Scholar
, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account (Oxford, 1988), 234 ff (for a comparative discussion)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, [1993] CLJ 389
, (1993) 109 LQR 524
[1994] Conv 58
, Penalty Clauses and Forfeiture of Monies Paid (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 61, London, 1975)
Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, ed. , and (4th edn, Sydney, 2003), 18-080 to 18-125 (for Australian case law)Google Scholar
, Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account (Oxford, 1988), 234 ff (for a comparative discussion)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitty on Contracts (30th edn, London, 2008), chapter 16;
, Illegality and Public Policy (2nd edn, 2009)
, The Illegality Defence (Law Commission Report No. 320, London, 2010), Part 3 (and the other Law Commission papers cited therein)
, ‘Unfair Contract Terms in the Common Frame of Reference’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 186Google Scholar
, ‘Do We Need a Global Commercial Code?’ (2000–3) 5 Uniform Law Review / Revue de droit uniforme 469–81
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on theUNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006)
, ‘Why Europe Needs a Civil Code: European Identity and the Social Model’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 259Google Scholar
, Commercial Law in the Next Millennium (London, 1998) (Hamlyn Lecture Series, 1997), 88–105Google Scholar
, ‘The Contribution of European Jurists in the Field of European Contract Law’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 363Google Scholar
and (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen, 2004)
, ‘European Contract Law? A Matter of Consumer Protection, Citizenship, or Justice?’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 500Google Scholar
, ‘International Conventions and Commercial Law: The Pursuit of Uniformity’ (1990) 106 LQR530Google Scholar
and (eds.), Principles of European Contract Law (The Hague, 2000)
, Principles of European Contract Law and UNIDROIT Principles: Similarities, Differences and Perspectives (Centro di studi e ricerche di diritto comparata e straniero, Rome, 2002)Google Scholar
, ‘Review of Academic Approaches to the European Contract Law Codification Project’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 699Google Scholar
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009)
, ‘Common Frame of Reference and UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: Coexistence, Competition, or Overkill of Soft Law?’ (2010) 6 European Review of Contract Law143–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Ius Commune and the Principles of European Contract Law: Contemporary Renewal of an Old Idea’, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 1Google Scholar
and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), chapter 2 (N. Cohen, Israel), chapter 6 (E. A. Farnsworth, USA) and chapter 7 (W. Ebke and B. M. Steinhauer, Germany)
, Contract Law: Themes for the Twenty First Century (2nd edn, Oxford, 2006), chapter 5 (also in M. Furmston (ed.), The Law of Contract (3rd edn, London, 2007), chapter 1)Google Scholar
, ‘The Common Law of Contract in 1993: Is There a General Doctrine of Good Faith?’ (1993) 23 Hong Kong Law Journal318Google Scholar
(ed.), Good Faith in Contract and Property Law (Oxford, 1999)
and (eds.), Principles of European Contract Law (The Hague, 2000)
, ‘Is Good Faith an Overarching General Clause in the Principles of European Contract Law?’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 601Google Scholar
, ‘Good Faith’, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 2Google Scholar
, ‘Good Faith, Mixed Legal Systems and the Principles of European Contract Law’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 614Google Scholar
, ‘The Meaning of Good Faith’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 687Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 LQR433Google Scholar
, ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences’ (1998) 61 MLR11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.), Good Faith in European Contract Law (Cambridge, 2000)
, ‘The English Law of Contract: Time for Review?’ (2009) 17 European Review of Private Law155, 168 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Why Europe Needs a Civil Code: European Identity and the Social Model’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 259Google Scholar
, Contract Code: Drawn up on Behalf of the English Law Commission (Milan, 1993) (a codification of the common law rules of contract is available at: www.difc.ae/laws-regulations/ (Dubai International Financial Centre))Google Scholar
, ‘Unfair Contract Terms in the Common Frame of Reference’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 186Google Scholar
, ‘Do We Need a Global Commercial Code?’ (2000–3) 5 Uniform Law Review / Revue de droit uniforme 469–81
(ed.), The UNIDROIT Principles in Practice: Case Law and Bibliography on theUNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2nd edn, Ardsley, NY, 2006)
, ‘Why Europe Needs a Civil Code: European Identity and the Social Model’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 259Google Scholar
, Commercial Law in the Next Millennium (London, 1998) (Hamlyn Lecture Series, 1997), 88–105Google Scholar
, ‘The Contribution of European Jurists in the Field of European Contract Law’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 363Google Scholar
and (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen, 2004)
, ‘European Contract Law? A Matter of Consumer Protection, Citizenship, or Justice?’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 500Google Scholar
, ‘International Conventions and Commercial Law: The Pursuit of Uniformity’ (1990) 106 LQR530Google Scholar
and (eds.), Principles of European Contract Law (The Hague, 2000)
, Principles of European Contract Law and UNIDROIT Principles: Similarities, Differences and Perspectives (Centro di studi e ricerche di diritto comparata e straniero, Rome, 2002)Google Scholar
, ‘Review of Academic Approaches to the European Contract Law Codification Project’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 699Google Scholar
and (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Oxford, 2009)
, ‘Common Frame of Reference and UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: Coexistence, Competition, or Overkill of Soft Law?’ (2010) 6 European Review of Contract Law143–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Ius Commune and the Principles of European Contract Law: Contemporary Renewal of an Old Idea’, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 1Google Scholar
and (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford, 1995), chapter 2 (N. Cohen, Israel), chapter 6 (E. A. Farnsworth, USA) and chapter 7 (W. Ebke and B. M. Steinhauer, Germany)
, Contract Law: Themes for the Twenty First Century (2nd edn, Oxford, 2006), chapter 5 (also in M. Furmston (ed.), The Law of Contract (3rd edn, London, 2007), chapter 1)Google Scholar
, ‘The Common Law of Contract in 1993: Is There a General Doctrine of Good Faith?’ (1993) 23 Hong Kong Law Journal318Google Scholar
(ed.), Good Faith in Contract and Property Law (Oxford, 1999)
and (eds.), Principles of European Contract Law (The Hague, 2000)
, ‘Is Good Faith an Overarching General Clause in the Principles of European Contract Law?’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 601Google Scholar
, ‘Good Faith’, in and (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2006), chapter 2Google Scholar
, ‘Good Faith, Mixed Legal Systems and the Principles of European Contract Law’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 614Google Scholar
, ‘The Meaning of Good Faith’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 687Google Scholar
, ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 LQR433Google Scholar
, ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences’ (1998) 61 MLR11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.), Good Faith in European Contract Law (Cambridge, 2000)
, ‘The English Law of Contract: Time for Review?’ (2009) 17 European Review of Private Law155, 168 ffGoogle Scholar
, ‘Why Europe Needs a Civil Code: European Identity and the Social Model’, in Liber Amicorum Guido Alpa: National Private Law Systems (London, 2007), 259Google Scholar
, Contract Code: Drawn up on Behalf of the English Law Commission (Milan, 1993) (a codification of the common law rules of contract is available at: www.difc.ae/laws-regulations/ (Dubai International Financial Centre))Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by