Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:38:47.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Eleven - Contracts and private law in the emerging ecology of international lawmaking

from Part Three - Structuring fields: Market dominance, complementarity and differentiation in complex institutional ecologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Grégoire Mallard
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Jérôme Sgard
Affiliation:
Sciences Po, Paris
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Contractual Knowledge
One Hundred Years of Legal Experimentation in Global Markets
, pp. 350 - 399
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., Green, Jessica F. and Keohane, Robert O.. August 2013. “Organizational Ecologies and Organizational Strategies in Global Politics.” Discussion Paper 2013–57. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, available online at http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/dp57_abbott-green-keohane.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen, and Meunier, Sophie. 2009 (March). “The Politics of Regime Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Bar Association, “Report of the Special Committee on a League of Nations” (1919).Google Scholar
Baty, J. 1914. Polarized Law: Three Lectures on Conflicts of Law. London: Stevens & Haynes.Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas J., and Hall, Rodney Bruce. 2002. “Private Authority as Global Governance.” In The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Hall, Rodney Bruce and Biersteker, Thomas J., eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan. 2015. “Turn-Around: Reflections on the Present Day Influence of Negotiations on International Bankruptcy at the Fifth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law in 1925.” Brooklyn J. Corp., Comm. & Fin. L. 9: 1–19.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan, and Halliday, Terence. December 2006. “Legitimation and Global Lawmaking.” Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 952492, available online at http://ssrn.com/abstract=952492.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan and Halliday, Terence. 2007a. “Incrementalisms and Global Lawmaking.” Brooklyn J. Int'l L. 32: 851–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan and Halliday, Terence. 2007b. “Harmonization and Modernization in UNCITRAL's Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law.” Tex. Int'l L. J. 42: 475–514.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan, and Halliday, Terence. August 23, 2011. “Social Ecology, Recursivity and Temporality: Towards a Sociology of Global Law-Making,” paper read at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan, and Halliday, Terence. May 6–7, 2011. “Political Ecologies in Global Norm-Making for International Trade Law,” paper read at Regional Colloquium on Globalization and Law, University of Chicago Law School.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan, and Halliday, Terence. 2012. “Global Duelists: The Recursive Politics of the Text in International Trade Law.” In Socio-Legal Approaches to International Economic Law: Test, Context, Subtext (Perry-Kessaris, Amanda, ed.). London: Routlege Publications.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan, and Halliday, Terence. 2015. “The Macropolitics and Microeconomics of Global Financial Crises: Bankruptcy as a Point of Reference.” Forthcoming in Sovereign Insolvency: Possible Legal Solutions (Garasic, Jasna and Bodiroga-Vukobrat, Nadia, eds.). Springer Press.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan, and Halliday, Terence. (In Draft). Global Legislators: The Crafting of Trade Law for the World.Google Scholar
Cordovez, Diego. 1967. “The Making of UNCTAD: Institutional Background and Legislative History. Journal of Int'l Law 1(3): 243328.Google Scholar
Covenant of the League of Nations. 1919.Google Scholar
Coyle, John F. 2011. “Rethinking the Commercial Law Treaty.” Georgia Law Review 45: 343407.Google Scholar
Demogue, René. 1927. L'Unification Internationale du Droit Privé.Google Scholar
Dubinksy, Paul R. 2005. “Human Rights Law Meets Private Law Harmonization: The Coming Conflict.” Yale J. Int'l L. 30: 211317.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, Allen. 1962. “Formation of International Sales Contracts: Three Attempts at Unification.” U. Pa. L. Rev. 110: 305329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutteridge, Harold Cooke. 1951. The Codification of Private International Law: Seventeenth Lecture on the David Murray Foundation at the University of Glasgow on May 11, 1950. New York City: Jackson, Son and Co.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence. 2007. “Legitimacy, Technology and Leverage: The Building Blocks of Insolvency Architecture in the Decade Past and the Decade Ahead.” Brooklyn J. Int'l L. 32: 10811102.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence, Block-Lieb, Susan, and Carruthers, Bruce. 2010. “Rhetorical Legitimation: Global Scripts as Strategic Devices on International Organizations.” Socio-Economic Review 8: 77112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Carruthers, Bruce. 2009. Bankrupt: Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence, Pacewicz, Josh, and Block-Lieb, Susan. 2013. “Who Governs? Delegations in Global Trade Lawmaking.” Gov. & Reg. 7: 279298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, A. Pearce. 1909. The Hague Peace Conferences and Other International Conferences Concerning the Laws and Usages of War: Texts of Conventions with Commentaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honnold, John. 1965. “The Uniform Law for the International Sale of Goods: The Hague Convention of 1964.” Law and Contemporary Problems 30: 326352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honnold, John. 1959. “A Uniform Law for International Sales.” U. Pa. L. Rev. 107: 299330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. 1975. The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy. New York, Washington, London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Janis, Mark Weston. 2010. America and the Law of Nations: 1776–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David. 1987. “The Move to Institutions.” Cardozo Law Review 8: 841988.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 2006. “One, Two, Three, Many Legal Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Cosmopolitan Dream.” Speech delivered at the International Law Association, available online at www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/dkennedy/speeches/LegalOrders.pdfGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2002. “Fragmentation of International Law: Postmodern Anxieties.” Leiden Journal of International Law 15: 552–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
League of Nations. 1920. “Report of the International Finance Conference (Brussels, Belgium),” available online at http://archive.org/stream/reportofinternat00interich#page/236/mode/2up.Google Scholar
League of Nations. 1920. Advisory Committee of Jurists; Permanent Court of International Justice. Documents presented to the committee relating to existing plans for the establishment of a permanent court of international justice.Google Scholar
League of Nations. 1921. Permanent Court of International Justice: Documents concerning the action taken by the Council for the League of Nations under Art. 14 of the covenant, and the adoption by the Assembly of the Statute of the Permanent Court.Google Scholar
League of Nations. December 1922. Economics and Financial Section, International Brussels Finance Conference of 1920 – The Recommendations and Their Application: A Review After Two Years.Google Scholar
League of Nations, Economic Committee. July 1923. “Unification of Laws Relating to Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes”: General Report and Individual Reports submitted by Prof. D. Josephus Jitta (Netherlands), Sir Mackenzie D. Chalmers (Great Britain), Prof. Dr. Franz Klein (Austria), and Prof. Ch. Lyon Caen (France).Google Scholar
League of Nations. 1924. Official Journal, Special Supplement No. 23, Records of the Assembly (Geneva).Google Scholar
League of Nations. January 1926. Official Journal, 7th Year, No. 1 (Geneva).Google Scholar
League of Nations. Feb. 17, 1930. Preparatory Documents: Drafts Prepared by the League of Nations Experts and Observations by Governments for the International Conference for the Unification of the Law on Bills of Exchange, Promissory Notes and Cheques, Official Doc. No. C.234.M.83.Google Scholar
League of Nations. May 13–June 7, 1930. Records of the International Conference for the Unification of Law on Bills of Exchange, Promissory Notes and Cheques, First Session, Official Doc. No. C.360.M.151.Google Scholar
League of Nations. February 23–March 19, 1931. Records of the International Conference for the Unification of Law on Bills of Exchange, Promissory Notes and Cheques, Second Session, Official Doc. No. C.294.M.137.Google Scholar
Mallard, Grégoire. 2014. Fallout: Nuclear Diplomacy in an Age of Global Fracture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, John Bassett. 1937. “Fifty Years of International Law.” Harv. L. Rev. 50: 395448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadelmann, Kurt H. 1954. “Ignored State Interests: The Federal Government and International Efforts to Unify Rule of Private Law.” U. Pa. L. Rev. 102: 323366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadelmann, Kurt H. 1964. “The US and Plans for a Uniform (World) Law on International Sales of Goods.” U. Pa. L. Rev. 112: 697709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northedge, Frederick. 1986. The League of Nations: Its Life and Times – 1920–1946. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Arthur. 1943. Principles of Private International Law. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis W. Dec. 1996. “The League of Nations and the Foreshadowing of the International Monetary Fund,” Princeton University. Essays in International Finance No. 201.Google Scholar
Peters, Lena. 2012. International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT). Walters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, Balakrishnan. 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, and Pollack, Mark. 2010. “Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance.” Minnesota Law Review 94: 706797.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 2001. When Formality Works: Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sturley, Michael F. 1991. “The History of COGSA and The Hague Rules.” Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 22: 1–57.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL, Hague Conference and UNIDROIT. 2012. Texts on Security Interests: Comparison and Analysis of Major Features of International Instruments Relating to Secured Transactions, available online at www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/security/UNCITRAL-HccH-Unidroit-e.pdf.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1930. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1930.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1931. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1931.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1932. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1932.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1933. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1933.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1934–35. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1934–35.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1935–36. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1935–36.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1936–37. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1936–37.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1937–39. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1937–38 and 1938–39.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1941–44. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1941–44.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1945–46. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1945–46.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1950. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1950.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1951. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1951.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1952. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1952.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1953. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1953.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1954. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1954.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1955. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1955.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1956. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1956.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT, International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. 1964. Rapport sur activité de l'Institute International de Rome Pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Pendant l'annee 1964.Google Scholar
United Nations. April, 29, 1947. Documents on the Development and Codification of International Law, Part I, Historical Survey of Development of International Law and Its Codification by International Conferences, UN Doc. No. A/Ac.10/5.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly Resolution. 1966. U.N. Doc. No. A/95933; A/C.6/L.571, L.572, L.579 and Add.1 and 2.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. December, 9, 1965. Sixth Committee. 894th Meeting, UN Doc. No. A/C.6/SR.894.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. December 2, 1966. Sixth Committee, 946th Meeting, UN Doc. No. A/C.6/SR.946.Google Scholar
Van Loon, Hans. 2007. “The Hague Conference on Private International Law.” Hague Justice Journal, 2: 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voskuil, C.C.A. 1993. “Preface, The Influence of the Hague Conference on Private International Law:” Selected Essays to Celebrate the 100th Anniversary of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (Martinus Nijhod Publishers 1993), reprinted in [XL] Netherlands Int'l L. Rev. XI, at XIX.Google Scholar
Yannioupolos, A.N. 1965. “The Unification of Private Maritime Law by International Conventions.” Journal of Law and Contemporary Problems 30: 370399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×