Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:54:49.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - From Kyoto to Paris

Business and Climate Change

from Section IV - Responsibility: Corporate Political Responsibility and Climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2023

Thomas P. Lyon
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores the political role of business in influencing several important federal climate change policy initiatives over the last two decade. These include the Kyoto Protocol (1998), the Climate Stewardship Act (2003), the Climate Security Act (2007), the American Clean Energy and Security Act (2009), the Clean Power Plan (2015), and the Paris Climate Agreement (2015). It examines the increasing patterns of division within the business community and explains why a growing number of companies and investors have voiced support for federal policies to address the risks of global climate change. It also explores why, nonetheless, business opponent of federal regulation have been consistently so successful in preventing the enactment of comprehensive greenhouse reduction policies by the federal government. A key reason is that business opponents of regulation have more to lose than its proponents have to gain.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagri, N. (2017). The Environment-Hating US Chamber of Commerce Is Losing the Support of the World’s Biggest Companies. Quartz, November 19.Google Scholar
Big Tech and Climate Policy: An Influence Map Report (2021). Influence Map, January 1.Google Scholar
Brulle, R. (2018). The Climate Lobby: A Sectoral Analysis of Lobbying Spending on Climate Change in the USA, 2100–2016. Climate Change, 149, 285–303.Google Scholar
Bradsherm, B. (1999). New York Times, July 12.Google Scholar
Business for Innovative Climate and Energy Policy (2019). Wikipedia, September 17.Google Scholar
Business Statement. (2017). Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.Google Scholar
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. (2017). Dear President Trump. C2ES Advertisement, May 9.Google Scholar
Chen, H. (2017). Companies Defend Paris Deal Because of Its Economic Benefits. National Resource Defense Council, June 1.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2009). US Firms Quit Chamber of Commerce over Climate Change. The Guardian, September 29.Google Scholar
Cory, J., Lerner, M., & Osgood, I. (2021). Supply Chain Linkages and the Extended Carbon Coalition. American Journal of Political Science, 65(1), 6987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, M., & Friedman, H. (2023). Disclosure of Political Responsibility with Respect to Climate Change. In Lyon, T., ed., Corporate Political Responsibility. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delmas, M., Lim, J., & Nairn-Birch, N. (2016). Corporate Environmental Performance and Lobbying. Journal of Management Discoveries, 2(2), 175–97.Google Scholar
Downie, C. (2017). Fighting for King Coal’s Crown: Business Actors in the US Coal and Utility Industries. Global Environmental Politics, 17(1), 2139.Google Scholar
Downie, C. (2019). Business Battles in the US Energy Sector: Lesson for a Clean Energy Transition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entine, J. (2009). Why Climate Change Legislation Is Turning Corporate America Green. Forbes, October 2.Google Scholar
Gitsham, M. (2019). Why Climate Change and Other Global Problems Are Pushing Some Business Leaders to Embrace Regulation. Sustainability, October 19.Google Scholar
Grumbach, J. (2015). Polluting Industries as Climate Protagonists: Cap and Trade and the Problem of Business Preferences. Business & Politics, 17(4), 633–59.Google Scholar
Gunther, M. (2015). Corporate America’s Position on the EPA Clean Power Plan. The Guardian, April 2.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. (2020). The Unlikely Environmentalists. Foreign Affairs, May/June, 47–51.Google Scholar
Karapin, K. (2016). Political Opportunities for Climate Policy: California, New York, and the Federal Government. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. (2020). The Enemy of My Enemy: Why Firms Support Climate Change Regulation. International Organization, 2, 187–22.Google Scholar
Ketu, Y., & Rothstein, S. (2023). Practicing Responsible Policy Engagement: How Large U.S. Companies Lobby on Climate Change. In Lyon, T., ed., Corporate Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavellem, M. (2009). An Army of Lobbyists Readies for Battle on Climate Bill. Yale Environment, 360.Google Scholar
Layzar, J. (2007). Deep Freeze: How Business Has Shaped the Global Warming Debate in Congress. In Kraft, M. and Kamieniecki, S., eds., Business and Environmental Policy: Corporate Interests in the American Political System. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 93126.Google Scholar
Lexington (2021). Green on Brown. Economist, October 2.Google Scholar
List of Supporters of the Clean Power Plan in Court. (2016). Environmental Defense Fund. www.edf.org/sites/default/files/content/list_of_supporters_of_the_clean_power_plan_in_court.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lizza, R. (2010). As the World Burns. New Yorker, October 2.Google Scholar
Lyon, T., ed. (2010). Good Cop Bad Cop: Environmental NGOs and their Strategies Toward Business. Washington DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Lyon, T., & Delmas, H. (2018). When Corporations Take Credit for Green Deeds Their Lobbying May Tell Another Story. The Conversation, July 17.Google Scholar
Lyon, T., & Mandelkorn, W. (2023). The Meaning of Corporate Political Responsibility. In Lyon, T., ed., Corporate Political Responsibly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, T., et al. (2018). CSR Needs CPR: Corporate Sustainability and Politics. California Management Review, 60(4), 524.Google Scholar
McArdle, M. (2015). 81 Major Corporations – Including Google, Facebook, Coca Cola, General Motors – Sign WH Pledge to Back Global Climate Change Deal. CNS News, October 20.Google Scholar
McKibben, B. (2020). Wall Street Is Starting to Put Pressure on the Fossil Fuel Industry – Just Not Aggressively Enough. Fortune, March 16.Google Scholar
Meckling, J. (2011). Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meckling, J. (2015). Oppose, Support, or Hedge? Distributional Effects, Regulatory Pressure, and Business Strategy in Environmental Politics. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 1937.Google Scholar
Meckling, J., & Trachtman, S. (2020). The Home State Effect on National Business Coalitions: Evidence from U.S. Climate Policies. Prepared for Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Mildenberger, M. (2012). The Politics of Strategic Accommodation: Explaining Business Support for US Climate Policy. Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
Mildenberger, M. (2020). Carbon Captured: How Business and Labor Control Climate Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugill, B. (2016). The Suit against the Clean Power Plan, Explained. Climate Central, April 12.Google Scholar
Mulkern, A. (2009). Lobbying Cash Paved Climate Bill’s Road to House Floor. New York Times, June 16.Google Scholar
Olsen, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Partnership for a Better Energy Future. (2014). Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, May 9.Google Scholar
Prattico, E. (2017). Why Business Supported the Clean Power Plan: It Makes Economic Sense. BSR Blog, October 18.Google Scholar
Samuels, A. (2017). The Myth That Business Hated Obama’s Clean Power Plan. The Atlantic, October 10.Google Scholar
Schlager, E., Engel, K., & Rider, S. (2011). Navigating Climate Change Policy: The Opportunities of Federalism. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Surowiecki, J. (2009). Exit Though Lobby. New Yorker, October 12.Google Scholar
Victor, D. (2017). “Climate Change Is Real”: Many U.S. Companies Lament Paris Accord Exit. New York Times, June 1.Google Scholar
Vormedal, I. (2010). States and Markets in Global Environmental Governance: The Role of Tipping Points in International Regime Formation. European Journal of International Relations, 18(2), 251–75.Google Scholar
Vormedal, I. (2011). From Foe to Friend? The Tipping Point and U.S. Climate Politics. Business and Politics, 13(3), 129.Google Scholar
Walker, E. (2023). What Drives Firms to Disclose Their Political Activity? In Lyon, T., ed., Corporate Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, L. (2017). Why the Clean Power Plan Is Good for Business. GreenBiz, September 13.Google Scholar
Werner, T. (2023). Promise and Peril: Lessons from Shareholder Reactions to Corporate Political Activity Disclosure. In Lyon, T., ed., Corporate Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • From Kyoto to Paris
  • Edited by Thomas P. Lyon, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Corporate Political Responsibility
  • Online publication: 16 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009420815.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • From Kyoto to Paris
  • Edited by Thomas P. Lyon, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Corporate Political Responsibility
  • Online publication: 16 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009420815.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • From Kyoto to Paris
  • Edited by Thomas P. Lyon, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Corporate Political Responsibility
  • Online publication: 16 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009420815.015
Available formats
×