Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Creating Scientific Controversies
  • Cited by 25
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
October 2015
Print publication year:
2015
Online ISBN:
9781107706903
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706903
Subjects:
Science Handbooks, Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, General Science
Information

Book description

For decades, cigarette companies helped to promote the impression that there was no scientific consensus concerning the safety of their product. The appearance of controversy, however, was misleading, designed to confuse the public and to protect industry interests. Created scientific controversies emerge when expert communities are in broad agreement but the public perception is one of profound scientific uncertainty and doubt. In the first book-length analysis of the concept of a created scientific controversy, David Harker explores issues including climate change, Creation science, the anti-vaccine movement and genetically modified crops. Drawing on work in cognitive psychology, social epistemology, critical thinking and philosophy of science, he shows readers how to better understand, evaluate, and respond to the appearance of scientific controversy. His book will be a valuable resource for students of philosophy of science, environmental and health sciences, and social and natural sciences.

Reviews

‘Harker has produced a valuable book that introduces students to important insights from the philosophy of science and cognitive psychology in order to prepare them for grappling with major debates at the intersection of science and society.'

Kevin Elliott - Michigan State University

‘This is a stimulating and engaging book that introduces some of the core issues in the philosophy of science by taking the reader through a variety of important scientific controversies. By means of this novel approach it offers a useful resource to not only philosophers of science and their students but also anyone concerned about rational decision making and critical thinking in general, including the scientifically literate public and scientists themselves.'

Steven French - University of Leeds

‘This is a unique and important book that addresses a topic of pressing social and political importance with great care and clarity, and an excellent understanding of the relevant science. This is applied philosophy of science at its best.'

James Ladyman - University of Bristol

'This book has the look and feel of a classroom text, complete with topics for discussion at the end of each chapter. … Harker spends a good deal of time providing background on the history of the philosophy of science, elementary logic, and the literature on cognitive bias. Each of these topics in and of themselves is useful. Indeed, Harker’s explanation of the problem of underdetermination of theory by evidence was extremely well done. The explanation of the literature on cognitive bias was also a nice compendium of diverse research findings.'

Lee McIntyre Source: Metascience

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
References
Alexander, D., and Numbers, R.. 2010. Biology and ideology from Descartes to Dawkins (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Anderegg, W., Prall, J., Harold, J. and Schneider, S.. 2010. ‘Expert credibility in climate change’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 12107–12109.
Archer, D., and Rahmstorf, S.. 2010. The climate crisis: an introductory guide to climate change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Ariely, D. 2010. Predictably irrational, expanded revised edition (New York: Harper Perennial).
Bacon, F. 1999. Selected philosophical works, Hackett Classics (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett). First published in Bacon, F., Novum Organum Scientiarum, 1620.
Barbour, I. 1990. Religion in an age of science, Gifford Lectures 1989–1991 (New York: HarperCollins).
Barker, G., and Kitcher, P.. 2013. Philosophy of science: a new introduction, Fundamentals of philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Behe, M. 1996. Darwin's black box: the biochemical challenge to evolution (New York: Free Press).
Behe, M. 2007. The edge of evolution: the search for the limits of Darwinism (New York: Simon and Schuster).
Bekelman, J., Li, Y. and Gross, C.. 2003. ‘Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 454–465.
Bird, A. 2001. Thomas Kuhn, Philosophy Now (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Black, M. 1954. ‘The inductive support of inductive rules’, in Problems of analysis (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press).
Bloor, D. 1991. Knowledge and social imagery (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Bogen, J. 2014. ‘Theory and observation in science’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/science-theory-observation/.
Bowler, P., and Morus, I.. 2005. Making modern science: a historical survey (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Brandt, A. 2009. The cigarette century: the rise, fall, and deadly persistence of the product that defined America (Cambridge, MA: Basic Books).
Brockman, J. (ed.). 2006. Intelligent thought: science versus the intelligent design movement (New York: Vintage).
Cairns-Smith, A. G. 1990. Seven clues to the origin of life: a scientific detective story (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Carroll, S. 2007. The making of the fittest: DNA and the ultimate forensic record of evolution (New York: W.W. Norton).
Ceccarelli, L. 2011. ‘Manufactured scientific controversy: science, rhetoric, and public debate’, Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14, 195–228.
Chakravartty, A. 2008. ‘What you don't know can't hurt you: realism and the unconceived’, Philosophical Studies, 137, 149–158.
Chalmers, A.F. 2013. What is this thing called science?, edition (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).
Collins, H., and Pinch, T.. 2002. The Golem at large: what you should know about technology, Canto (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P. and Skuce, A.. 2013. ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’, Environmental Research Letters, 8, 024024.
Coyne, J. 2009. Why evolution is true (New York: Viking Penguin Books).
Darwin, C. 2004. On the origin of species (New York: CRW Publishing). First published in 1859.
Dawkins, R. 2010. The greatest show on earth: the evidence for evolution, reprint edition (New York: Free Press).
Dembski, W. 2002. Intelligent design: the bridge between science & theology (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic).
Dixon, T. 2008. Science and religion: a very short introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Douglas, H. 2009. Science, policy and the value-free ideal (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Dupré, J. 1995. The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Durban Declaration. 2000. Nature, 406, 15–16.
Elliott, K., and Resnik, D.. 2015. ‘Scientific Reproducibility, Human Error, and Public Policy’, BioScience, 65, 5–6.
Fahrbach, L. 2011. ‘How the growth of science ends theory change’, Synthese, 180, 139–155.
Fedoroff, N., and Brown, N.. 2006. Mendel in the kitchen: a scientist's view of genetically modified food (Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press).
Ferngren, G.B. 2002. Science and religion: a historical introduction (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Flannery, T. 2001. The weather makers: how man is changing the climate and what it means for life on earth (New York: Grove Press).
Fodor, J. 1984. ‘Observation reconsidered’, Philosophy of Science, 51, 23–43.
Forrest, B., and Gross, P.. 2004. Creationism's Trojan horse: the wedge of intelligent design (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Franklin, A., Edwards, A.W.F., Fairbanks, D.J. and Hartl, D.L.. 2008. Ending the Mendel-Fisher controversy (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Futuyama, D.J. 2013. Evolution, edition (Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates).
Gelman, S. 2004. ‘Psychological essentialism in children’, Trends in cognitive sciences, 8, 404–409.
Gigerenzer, G. 2006. ‘Out of the frying pan into the fire: behavioral reactions to terrorist attacks’, Risk Analysis, 26, 347–351.
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, Science and its conceptual foundations series (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2008. ‘Recurrent, transient underdetermination and the glass half-full’, Philosophical Studies, 137, 141–148.
Goldacre, B. 2010. Bad science: quacks, hacks, and big pharma flacks (New York: Faber and Faber).
Goldman, A. 2001. ‘Experts: which ones should you trust?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63, 85–110.
Gould, S.J. 1997. ‘Nonoverlapping magisteria’, Natural History, 106, 16–22.
Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Hacking, I. 1992. ‘The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences’, in Pickering, Andrew (ed.), Science as practice and culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 29–64.
Hacking, I., 2000. The social construction of what? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Hamilton, C. 2013. Earthmasters: the dawn of the age of climate engineering (New Haven, CT:Yale University Press).
Hanson, N.R. 1958. Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Heath, C., and Heath, D.. 2007. Made to stick: why some ideas survive and others die (New York: Random House).
Henig, R. 2001. The monk in the garden: the lost and found genius of Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt).
Houghton, J. 2009. Global warming: the complete briefing, edition (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Hoyningen-Huene, P. 1993. Reconstructing scientific revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's philosophy of science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Hull, D. 1988. Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science, Science and its conceptual foundations series (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Hume, D. 2000. Treatise of human nature, Norton, D. and Norton, M. (eds.), Oxford philosophical texts (New York: Oxford University Press). First published 1738.
Hurley, P. 2014. A concise introduction to logic (Boston: Cengage Learning).
Isaak, M. 2007. The counter-creationism handbook (Oakland: University of California Press).
Jacoby, S. 2009. The Age of American Unreason (New York: Vintage Books).
Johnson, P. 2002. The wedge of truth: splitting the foundations of naturalism (Downer's Grove, IL: IVP Press).
Kahneman, D. 2013. Thinking, fast and slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).
Kalichman, S. 2009. Denying AIDS: conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and human tragedy (New York: Springer,).
Kalichman, S., Eaton, L. and Cherry, C.. 2010. ‘“There is no Proof that HIV causes AIDS”: AIDS denialism beliefs among people living with HIV/AIDS’, Journal for Behavioral Medicine, 33, 432–440.
Kitcher, P. 1993. The advancement of science (New York: Oxford University Press).
Kitcher, P. 2003. Science, truth, and democracy, Oxford studies in the philosophy of science (Oxford University Press,).
Klein, P. 2008. ‘Contemporary responses to Agrippa's trilemma’, in The Oxford handbook of skepticism (ed.) Greco, J. (New York: Oxford University Press).
Kloppenburg, J.R. Jr., 2005. First the seed: the political economy of plant biotechnology, edition (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).
Kuhn, T.S. 2012. The structure of scientific revolutions, edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). First published 1962.
Ladyman, J. 2001. Understanding philosophy of science (London: Routledge).
Lakatos, I. 1978. The methodology of scientific research programmes: volume 1, Philosophical papers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S.. 2013. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). First published 1979.
Laudan, L. 1981. ‘A confutation of convergent realism’, Philosophy of Science, 48, 19–49.
Laudan, L. 1983. ‘The demise of the demarcation problem’, in Cohen, R.S. and Laudan, L., Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis: essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 76), 111–127.
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. and Smith, N.. 2011. Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in May 2011 (Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication).
Loftus, E. 1977. ‘Shifting human color memory’, Memory & Cognition, 5, 696–699.
Longino, H. 1990. Science as social knowledge (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Magnus, P.D. 2010. ‘Inductions, red herrings, and the best explanation for the mixed record of science’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 803–819.
Maslin, M. 2009. Global warming: a very short introduction, edition (New York: Oxford University Press).
Miller, K.R. 2008. Only a theory: evolution and the battle for America's soul (New York: Viking Penguin Books).
Mnookin, S. 2012. The panic virus: the true story behind the vaccine-autism controversy (New York: Simon & Schuster).
Mooney, C. 2006. The Republican war on science (Cambridge, MA: Basic Books).
Nattrass, N. 2012. The AIDS conspiracy: science fights back (New York: Columbia University Press).
Nestle, M. 2003. Safe food: the politics of food safety (Oakland: University of California Press).
Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F. and Rosellini, D.. 2013. ‘An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research’, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 34, 77–88.
Nilsson, D., and Pelger, S.. 1994. ‘A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 256, 53–58.
Norton, J. 2003. ‘A material theory of induction’, Philosophy of Science, 70, 647–670.
Numbers, R.L. 2006. The creationists: from scientific creationism to intelligent design, Expanded edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Offit, P.A. 2010. Autism's false prophets: bad science, risky medicine, and the search for a cure (New York: Columbia University Press).
Okasha, S. 2002. Philosophy of science: a very short introduction (New York: Oxford University Press).
Okasha, S. 2005. ‘Does Hume's argument against induction rest on a quantifier-shift fallacy?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105, 253–271.
Oreskes, N. 2004. ‘The scientific consensus on climate change’, Science, 306, 1686.
Oreskes, N., and Conway, E.. 2011. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (London: Bloomsbury Press).
Otto, S. 2011. Fool me twice: fighting the assault on science in America (Emmaus, PA: Rodale Books).
Pigliucci, M., and Boudry, M.. 2013. Philosophy of pseudoscience: reconsidering the demarcation problem (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Pilkey, O., and Pilkey, K.. 2011. Global climate change: a primer (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books).
Proctor, R. 2012. Golden holocaust: origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition (Oakland, CA: University of California Press).
Pronin, E., Lin, D. and Ross, L.. 2002. ‘The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381.
Pronin, E., Gilovich, T. and Ross, L.. 2004. ‘Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others’, Psychological Review, 111, 781–799.
Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific realism: how science tracks truth, Philosophical issues in science (London and New York: Routledge).
Quine, W.V.O. 1951. ‘Two dogmas of empiricism’, Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.
Rahmstorf, S., Foster, G. and Cazenave, A.. 2012. ‘Comparing climate projections to observations up to 2011’, Environmental Research Letters, 7, 044035.
Ruse, M., and Pennock, R.. 2008. But is it science? The philosophical question in the creation/evolution controversy, updated edition (New York: Prometheus Books).
Russell, B. 1999. The problems of philosophy (New York: Dover). Originally published in 1912.
Salmon, M.H. 2006. Introduction to logic and critical thinking, edition (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).
Salmon, W. 1967. Foundations of scientific inference (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Sarkar, S. 2007. Doubting Darwin: creationist designs on evolution (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell).
Schick, T., and Vaughn, L.. 2013. How to think about weird things: critical thinking for a new age, edition (New York: McGraw-Hill).
Schwab, I. 2011. Evolution's witness: how eyes evolved (New York: Oxford University Press).
Schwarz, N., Skurnik, I., Yoon, C. and Park, D.. 2005. ‘How warnings about false claims become recommendations’, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713–724.
Scott, E.C. 2009. Evolution versus creationism: an introduction, edition (Oakland: University of California Press).
Shanks, N. 2007. God, the devil, and Darwin: a critique of intelligent design theory (New York, Oxford University Press).
Shermer, M. 2012. The believing brain: from ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies – how we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths (New York: St. Martin's Griffin).
Shome, D., and Marx, S.. 2009. The psychology of climate change communication: a guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public (New York: Center for Research on Environmental Decisions).
Shubin, N. 2009. Your inner fish: a journey into the 3.5-billion-year history of the human body (New York: Vintage).
Shulman, S., et al. 2012. Cooler smarter: practical steps for low-carbon living (Washington, DC: Island Press).
Simmons, N., Seymour, K., Habersetzer, J. and Gunnell, G.. 2008. ‘Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation’, Nature, 451, 818–821.
Slovic, P. 1987. ‘Perception of risk’, Science, 236, 280–285.
Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the past (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Solomon, M. 2001. Social empiricism (Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books).
Stanford, P.K. 2006. Exceeding our grasp: science, history and the problem of unconceived alternatives (New York: Oxford University Press).
Stanford, P.K. 2013. ‘Underdetermination of scientific theory’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/scientific-underdetermination/ >.
Stewart, C.N. 2003. Genetically modified planet: environmental impacts of genetically engineered plants (New York: Oxford University Press).
Sutherland, S. 2007. Irrationality, edition (London: Pinter & Martin Ltd).
Svenson, O. 1981. ‘Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?’, Acta Psychologica, 47, 143–148.
Union of Concerned Scientists. 2012. A climate of corporate control: how corporations have influenced the dialogue on climate science and policy (Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists).
Vickers, J. 2014. ‘The problem of induction’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/induction-problem/ >.
Weart, S. 2008. The discovery of global warming: revised and expanded edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Weaver, K., Garcia, S., Schwarz, N. and Miller, D.. 2007. ‘Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: a repetitive voice can sound like a chorus’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 821–833.
Weber, M. 2009. ‘The crux of crucial experiments: Duhem's problems and inference to the best explanation’, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 60, 19–49.
Whyte, J. 2004. Crimes against logic: exposing the bogus arguments of politicians, priests, journalists, and other serial offenders (New York: McGraw Hill).
Zammito, J.H. 2004. A nice derangement of epistemes: post-positivism in the study of science from Quine to Latour (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.