Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:29:18.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Right to Universal, Equal, and Nondiscriminatory Suffrage as a Norm of Customary International Law: Protecting the Prisoner's Right to Vote

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2009

Alec C. Ewald
Affiliation:
University of Vermont
Brandon Rottinghaus
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access

Summary

In the mid-17th century, Oliver Cromwell led Parliamentarian forces in a successful military campaign against the Royalists in the English Civil War. Cromwell captured and executed King Charles I in 1649. One faction of his Puritan coalition was known as the Levellers, a title initially applied by their detractors but one they themselves later embraced. The Levellers believed in the natural equality of all men in the political order (it appearing to have been beyond anyone's imagination at the time that women might have any political rights). “Universal manhood suffrage” was a key element of Leveller philosophy, which opposed limitation of the franchise to the propertied classes. As one of their leaders, a certain Colonel Rainsborough, famously put it in 1647, “Every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that government.”

The Levellers' concept was too radical. After Cromwell took power, he found the Leveller philosophy on suffrage more threatening to political stability than any of their other principles – including universal free speech – some of which would apparently influence the youthful U.S. government in the drafting of the Bill of Rights. Cromwell believed that their concept of universal manhood suffrage “pointed toward anarchy, [was an] attack on property, and [encouraged] mutiny in the army,” the latter because only soldiers believed they should have the right to vote. Cromwell's forces took up arms against the Levellers, they were repressed, and their leaders captured and shot (Cook 2006).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,American Law Institute. 1987. Restatement of the Law Third: The Foreign Relations Law of the United States. St. Paul: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian. 1998. Principles of Public International Law (5th ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cerna, Christina M. 1995. “Universal Democracy: An International Legal Right or the Pipe Dream of the West?New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (27) 289–329.Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan I. 1993. “Universal International Law.” American Journal of International Law (87) 529–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Terrance. 2006. “Three Levellers: Walwyn (1600–81), Lilburne (1614–57) and Overton (birth and death dates unknown).” Available at http://www.wsu.edu/∼tcook/doc/WalwynLilburneOverton.htm, accessed on August 4, 2006.
D'Amato, Anthony. 1971. The Concept of Custom in International Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ewald, Alec C. 2002. “‘Civil Death’: The Ideological Paradox of Criminal Disenfranchisement Law in the United States.” Wisconsin Law Review (2002) 1045–137.Google Scholar
Ezetah, Reginald. 1997. “The Right to Democracy: A Qualitative Inquiry.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law (22) 495–534.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1992. “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance.” American Journal of International Law (86) 46–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Gregory H. 1992. “The Right to Political Participation in International Law.” Yale Journal of International Law (17) 539–607.Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory H. 2001. “Election Monitoring: The International Legal Setting.” Wisconsin International Law Journal (19) 295–319.Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory H. and Roth, Brad R., eds. 2000. Democratic Governance and International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Garonne, Pierre. 1992. “Electoral Law: General Principles and Regulatory Levels.” Venice Commission paper, 3 Feb. 1992. Available at http://venice.coe.int/docs/1992/CDL(1992)001-e.asp, accessed on August 15, 2006.
Goodwin-Gill, Guy S. 1994. Free and Fair Elections: International Law and Practice. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.Google Scholar
Hannum, Hurst. 1995–96. “The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law (25) 287–397.Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. 1996. “General Comment 25 (57), General Comments under article 40, paragraph 4, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Adopted by the Committee at its 1510th meeting.” U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.7 (1996). Available at http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom25.htm, accessed on August 15, 2006.
Human Rights Committee. 2006. “Concluding Observations: United States.” (Advance Unedited Version) 87th Session, 10–28 July, 2006. Available at http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,HRC,USA,4562d94e2,45c30bb20,0.html, accessed Sept. 30, 2008.
International Law Association, Committee on Formation of Customary (General) International Law. 2000. “Final Report of the Committee: Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law.” Available at http://www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/30, visited Dec. 1, 2008.
Landreville, Pierre, and Lemonde, Lucie. 1991. “Voting Rights for Prison Inmates,” in Cassiday, Michael, ed., Democratic Rights and Electoral Reform in Canada, Vol. 10 of the Research Series of the Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Paust, Jordan J. 2003. International Law as Law of the United States (2nd ed.). Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
The Sentencing Project and Human Rights Watch. 1998. Losing the Vote: The Impact of Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States. Available at http://www.sentencingproject.org/pdfs/9080.pdf, accessed on August 11, 2006.
Sharp, Andrew, ed. 1998. The English Levellers. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Steiner, Henry S. 1988. “Political Participation as a Human Right.” Harvard Human Rights Yearbook (1) 77–134.Google Scholar
,U.N. Centre for Human Rights. 1994. Human Rights and Elections: A Handbook on the Legal, Technical and Human Rights Aspects of Elections. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
U.N. General Assembly. 1991. “Enhancing the Effectiveness of the Principle of Periodic and Genuine Elections.” UN Doc. A/RES/46/137 (17 Dec. 1991). Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dpa/ead/Resolutions/Strengthen/A%20RES%2046%20137.pdf, accessed on August 15, 2006.
USAID, Center for Democracy and Governance, Bureau for Global Programs. 1998a. Democracy and Governance: A Conceptual Framework. Available at http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnacr210.pdf, accessed on August 15, 2006.
USAID, Center for Democracy and Governance, Bureau for Global Programs. 1998b. Handbook of Democracy and Governance Program Indicators. Available at http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnacc390.pdf, accessed on August 15, 2006.
Wolfe, Don M. 1967. Leveller Manifestoes of the Puritan Revolution. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, Andrew, ed., The English Levellers (Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRef
Wolfe, Don, Leveller Manifestoes of the Puritan Revolution (Humanities Press, 1967), p. 212Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×